SCAM’ known today as ‘GAMING’

Bill Kearney

I love when these so-called experts give their expertise on this ‘SCAM’ known today as ‘GAMING.’
Now here’s the real deal on how ridiculous and unbeatable casino games are especially the game of blackjack.

If you never played blackjack in a casino the basic premise of the game is that you want to have a hand value that is closer to 21 than that of the dealer, without going over 21. Your hand is strictly played out against the hand of the dealer.

Even with all the player’s options, things like splitting pairs, doubling down, surrender, insurance, and natural blackjack paying 3-to-2 they are still at a tremendous disadvantage. The main reason for this is because the players’ cards are exposed. The dealer’s first card is face up, and their second card (the hole card) is face down. Therefore the player only knows half of what the dealer has, and here’s the real kicker, the player has to make the first decision on weather or not to hit or stand.

Think about this, if a friend invited you to their home to play a game under the same rules that casinos do with blackjack what kind of friend would you consider that to be?

Massachusetts ‘GAMING’ Future

Pittsburgh Tribune - May 11, 2014 - Don't let casinos monkey with state's good blackjack rules
Pennsylvania would lose more than it would win if casinos get to tinker with table-game rules.

Regulators run the risk of befouling the goose that laid the golden egg if they fall for the suggestion that casinos need “more flexibility in table-game rules.”

Read more: http://triblive.com/obituaries/newsstories/6075740-74/casinos-rules-million#ixzz31VfsZCBd

See More

 

By Mark Gruetze

Published: Sunday, May 11, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Pennsylvania would lose more than it would win if casinos get to tinker with table-game rules.

Regulators run the risk of befouling the goose that laid the golden egg if they fall for the suggestion that casinos need “more flexibility in table-game rules.”

 

That recommendation is buried within a 203-page report by Econsult Solutions of Philadelphia, hired by the Legislature to analyze the future of casino gambling in the state. The primary focus was the potential effect of Internet gambling in Pennsylvania. Econsult said the state could reap $113 million a year from online gambling.

The $153,000 study makes a persuasive argument that online gambling and traditional casinos appeal to different types of players. Three states already have online gambling, and Pennsylvania is a lucrative market because of its size. With the appropriate safeguards against underage and compulsive gambling — and, just as importantly, provisions to guarantee fair play by all involved — Internet gambling could be a welcome addition.

Officials of the Gaming Control Board, which oversees the state's 12 casinos, have declined comment on the report, saying they have not had time to review it in detail.

One thing to watch is how they respond to the recommendation for table-game “flexibility.” That sounds like code for letting casinos set their own rules.

Pennsylvania has some of the most player-friendly rules in the country. Because the state limits the number and location of casinos, the board spells out the rules for each game, including blackjack, the most popular table game across the country. The rules, which apply at all betting levels, include:

 

• Natural blackjacks must be paid 3-to-2 ($15 for a $10 bet)

• Dealer stands on Soft 17

• Players may “surrender,” or give up their hand in return for losing only half their bet.

Pennsylvania rules are better than those typically found in Las Vegas, Atlantic City or other gambling hot spots. For a player who adheres to basic strategy, the rules leave a house advantage of less than 0.4 percent.

In other jurisdictions, casinos generally allow dealers to hit Soft 17, which increases the house edge.

 

The Econsult study cites those extra winnings by the casinos — or, viewed from the other side, additional losses by players — as reason for making the change.

 

“The Pennsylvania regulation tips the odds slightly in favor of the player, and, as a result, leads to less revenue for the casino,” the study says.

That's an overstatement. Having the dealer stand on Soft 17 is better for the player than allowing the dealer to hit, but the house always has the advantage.

Casinos aren't exactly suffering from the supposed inflexibility. The casino win in March was the highest on record. Given the state of the overall economy, holding steady or posting a slight gain is remarkable.

Pennsylvania casinos may offer a plethora of side bets, which always carry a significant house advantage. For table-game players who want the shot at a big payoff, casinos may offer side bets with a progressive jackpot — again, with a hefty house advantage.

 

The danger of caving on Soft 17 is that it would set a precedent for other machinations with the basic rules of blackjack. The surrender option would be a likely next target. That, too, is a minor benefit to the player.

Then, the road would be paved for the abomination of 6-to-5 blackjack, in which a ,$10 bet wins $12 for a natural rather than $15 under the 3-to-2 requirement. This rule, already allowed in many jurisdictions where casinos have the option, makes blackjack virtually unplayable.

In truth, most blackjack players make so many mistakes that they lose a lot. The house always has an edge, even against the handful who follow basic strategy religiously.

The state shouldn't let casinos rewrite the rules just so they can win even more.

 

Mark Gruetze is administrative editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7838 or players@tribweb.com.

Money trail

Statewide slot players' loss for week ended May 4: $47.7 million, down from $48.5 million in comparable week last year. The state gets 55 percent of that.

 

Statewide slot payout rate since July 1: 89.9 percent; for every $100 bet, machines return an average of $89.90

 

High and low payout rates: 90.72 percent at Lady Luck Nemacolin; 89.2 percent at Penn National near Harrisburg

Rivers: 89.69 percent payout; weekly slot revenue $5.21 million, up from $5.14 million last year

Meadows: 89.94 percent; weekly revenue $4.79 million, up from $4.61 million

Presque Isle: 89.46 percent; weekly revenue $2.68 million, down from $2.75 million

Lady Luck Nemacolin: 90.72 percent payout; weekly revenue $560,060; not open last year

Source: Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

Caesar's considers N.J. cutbacks

Caesar's Entertainment Corp. is looking to cut expenses, and that could include closing one of its four Atlantic City casinos.

Chief Executive Officer Gary Loveman said last week that Caesar's is “looking at all of our options” in Atlantic City, Bloomberg News reported. While not specifically saying a casino would close, Loveman was quoted as saying: “In some cases reducing supply is the right answer.”

 

The company previously announced that its Harrah's Casino in Tunica, Miss., will close June 1. Of Atlantic City's 11 casinos, Caesar's owns four: Bally's, Caesars, Harrah's and Showboat. Atlantic City lost a casino in January, with the closing of the Atlantic Club, owned by Colony Capital.

Read more: http://triblive.com/obituaries/newsstories/6075740-74/casinos-rules-million#ixzz32y2RA8Ur
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter | triblive on Facebook