Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label lobbyists access. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lobbyists access. Show all posts

Sunday, February 1, 2015

SORRY. NO BREAD OR CIRCUSES TODAY








SORRY. NO BREAD OR CIRCUSES TODAY
January 31, 2015






Graphic shows Citigroup draft wording and then actual wording that ended up mysteriously in the final spending bill. Courtesy David Johnson and SmirkingChimp.


Chronicle News & Opinion

(MONROE, WA.) -- You might have noticed that much if not most of the national and local news media has been hard at work of late feeding you copious amounts of
bread and circuses mostly in the form of an infinitely long strand of meaningless trivia having to do with "deflated footballs" and who'll be eating what for snacks during the Super Bowl game.

Seeing this day after day some Americans, perhaps those who possess an IQ slightly above room temperature might be tempted to give in to the ongoing conspiracy theory that this is not an accident; it is a calculated plan of the corporate media elite to keep working class Americans stupid, happy and drooling at high noon on Main Street with that thousand-mile stare in their eyes.

You know. The patented Alfred E. Neumnan look replete with the goofy grin.

"What? Me worry?"

The "elite" in total being comprised mainly (it appears) of large, corporately owned media now firmly in bed with lawmakers who are now virtually (if not outright) owned by huge corporations, the Wall Street investment banks and billionaires -- all the people and entities your lawmaker needs to be reelected.

And, as you well know there is no need more pressing than a lawmaker being reelected.

How else, some ask, other than a grand conspiracy to explain the sheer tonnage of stories about deflated footballs and $7500 Super Bowl tickets when the mass media told you so little of how you and your family were sold down the river last month by your elected leaders in a move that may cost you dearly during the next Wall Street ignited Second Great Recession meltdown?

And there will be another one because your lawmakers unlocked for Wall Street the only door that had been separating the Street from gambling with your money as it did during the wild, crazy days of insane (and ultimately worthless) "derivatives" that sparked the Great Recession and virtually sank the American economy.

Did you enjoy losing your job/and or business and/or home during that time? Still haven't quite recovered you say?

Well, don't get too comfy attempting to crawl back up that ladder of middle class success because the next meltdown may be only a few years away and it may hit even harder and last longer than the first Great Recession.

GOT THAT RIVERBOAT GAMBLER FEVER

The huge banks can now, once again legally gamble with your (taxpayer) money thanks to the government spending bill Congress and the President agreed to last month.

Buried deep within that bill was a Weapon of Mass Economic Destruction: a clause that repeals part of the Dodd-Frank Act.

That clause was the only door protecting you and your family from the insatiable greed and uncontrollable gambling habits of the huge investment banks on Wall Street.

The ultimate hosing of the Great Unwashed has begun.

The act was designed to stop Wall Street from using other peoples’ money to support its gambling addiction, as it displayed quite nicely before the near-full economic meltdown of 2007-2008.
Dodd-Frank had stopped the banks from using commercial deposits that belong to you, your aunt Sally and Uncle John (which are insured by the government) to make the kind of risky bets that got the "too big to fail" banks into trouble and forced taxpayers to bail them out so they could survive to do it again another day.

The reason they were too big to fail is because they had access to gambling with your money and then your money again to bail them out once they got into trouble.

And now at a time when those same banks are bigger and far more powerful than before the Great Recession, they have that open door once again to gamble with your money.

HERE'S SOME OF THE PEOPLE WHO PUT YOUR FUTURE IN WALL STREET'S CROSSHAIRS

In Washington State, here's the lawmakers that voted yes for the "cromnibus" spending bill - a vote that allowed Wall Street and billionaires to get at your money again - and those who voted no.


Doc Hastings - Washington 4th R YES
Dennis Heck - Washington 10th D NO
Jaime Herrera Beutler - Washington 3rd R YES

Derek Kilmer - Washington 6th D VOTED NO
Rick Larsen - Washington 2nd D VOTED NO
Jim McDermott - Washington 7th D VOTED NO

Cathy McMorris Rodgers - Washington 5th R YES
David G. Reichert - Washington 8th R YES
Adam Smith - Washington 9th D NO


Now you know who to call up and complain to after the next Wall Street ignited meltdown of the economy that just might claim your job and/or your house.

And just where did that clause in the cromnibus bill come from almost word for word?

Citigroup.

A Dec. 16, 20914 story by David Johnson over at SmirkingChimp.com put it this way:


"Citibank (the consumer division of Citigroup) literally wrote the provision and paid someone to put it in the bill. This “Citibank” provision undid months of hard work getting the Dodd-Frank bill in place. No one in the House or Senate would admit to putting it in the bill. No one would say they supported the provision. But House/Senate leadership would not take it out of the bill because it was part of a “deal.” And, of course, it was put in at the last minute, making the choice “vote for it or shut down the government.”


Check the graphic at upper right he ran with the story showing the Citigroup draft of the bill and then the final wording.

Any questions now about who owns your lawmakers?

And just who is Citigroup? Only one of the largest "too big to fail" banks in the world.

ONE HUGE FINANCIAL GORILLA. IT GETS WHAT IT WANTS

Citigroup is a massive multinational banking and financial services corporation headquartered in New York City that was formed from one of the world's largest mergers in history by combining the banking giant Citicorp and financial conglomerate Travelers Group in October 1998.

As of January 2015, it is the third largest bank holding company in the US by assets. Its largest shareholders include funds from the Middle East and Singapore. At its height until the global financial crisis of 2008 Citigroup was the largest company and bank in the world by total assets with 357,000 employees.

Citigroup suffered huge losses during the global financial crisis of 2008 and was rescued in November 2008 by you the generous, always giving taxpayers of the United States in a massive stimulus package handed to it by your government.

They gambled and won-won with your money then, and they will do it again now that that the Dodd-Frank protection door is toast.

Former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert Reich put it this way in a recent column:

" The new legislation, incorporating language drafted by lobbyists for Wall Street’s biggest bank, Citigroup, does just this. It reopens the casino. This increases the likelihood you and I and other taxpayers will once again be left holding the bag."

Johnson asks this question in his December 2014 piece:

"How could something like this be in a bill if no one put it in the bill and no one indicated support for it? How is it that We the People not get it taken out if no one would say they put it in and no one would say they support it?

How FAR can we go from the principles of democracy, transparency, accountability and everything the country, the Constitution and the Congress are supposed to stand for?

This is one more example of how the economy is rigged against We the People. It is an example of how the government now works for a wealthy few against the interests of the rest of us.

In an honest system this would be a scandal deserving of a full, public, transparent investigation followed by prosecution of those responsible. In our current system what we got was “it must pass or the government will shut down.”


Johnson forgot one thing. In our current system we also get the pleasure of the major news organizations of our day - and almost all the local TV stations and newspapers - giving us a story after story about deflated footballs, 12th man flags above Space Needles and on buildings and football game nachos so those goofy, blank, thousand mile, what-me-worry stares shall never vanish from our faces.

As bread and circuses go, it's pretty effective stuff.


http://www.skyvalleychronicle.com/FEATURE-NEWS/SORRY-br-NO-BREAD-AND-CIRCUSES-TODAY-2005467








Thursday, March 6, 2014

Iowa casinos must spend millions to support dog racing



Iowa casinos must spend millions to support dog racing

By / March 6, 2014
 
By Paul Brennan | Iowa Watchdog

DES MOINES, Iowa — If a dog at one of Iowa’s two remaining greyhound racetracks were in the same shape as those racetracks’ finances, it would be euthanized on the spot.

Both greyhound racetracks lose millions of dollars each year, only remaining open because state law requires the casinos to which the tracks are attached to maintain greyhound racing.

Last year, the Horseshoe Casino in Council Bluffs spent almost $10 million to cover losses at its Bluffs Run Greyhound Park. The much smaller Mystique, a nonprofit casino in Dubuque, spent more than $4 million last year to keep the dogs running at its racetrack.

Both casinos grew out of the greyhound racetracks they now financially prop up. In 1994, the Iowa Legislature amended state gaming laws to allow casino games at racetracks, which were experiencing a decline in business. The continuation of greyhound racing at both locations was required.

As casinos prospered, the racetracks continued to decline. Betting at the two racetracks has fallen by 97 percent since they first opened in the 1980’s.

Photo by Alex Lapuerta
Photo by Alex Lapuerta

GOING TO THE DOGS: Iowa law mandates two of the state’s casino spend millions each year to prop up the state’s money-losing greyhound racetracks.

Bills now before the House and Senate — seemingly stalled at the moment — would drop the greyhound racing requirement for the two casinos in exchange for those businesses paying $70 million over seven years into a fund to assist greyhound breeders and others affected by the end of state-mandated dog racing.

The city councils of both Dubuque and Council Bluffs support dropping the requirement, as do the chambers of commerce of the two cities.

Opposing the change is the Iowa Greyhound Association, which represents breeders, handlers and others involved in greyhound racing. The IGA led successful efforts in 2010 and 2012 to defeat bills that would have dropped the racing mandate.

“Those casinos — which are very valuable properties, worth hundreds of millions of dollars — wouldn’t exist if we hadn’t provided the votes to get them their licenses,” Jerry Crawford, attorney for the IGA, told Iowa Watchdog. “And the agreement was that in exchange for our support, they would support greyhound racing forever.”

But the IGA didn’t support the 1994 change that brought casino games to tracks simply as a gesture of goodwill to casino interests. By that time, the three greyhound racetracks then in Iowa were well in decline.

A year before the law was changed, the Waterloo Greyhound Park filed for bankruptcy. In 1996, it went out of business.

The remaining parks were in better shape, but their best days already were behind them by the time their casinos opened their doors.

According to figures from the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission, betting at the Council Bluffs track peaked in 1987. Betting in Dubuque reached its peak in 1988.

Asked if greyhound racing would have survived in Iowa without the casinos, Crawford said it was impossible to know, but he did suggest it might have given careful management and proper promotion.

One thing Crawford was clear on is that the $70-million fund the casinos would pay in assistance money doesn’t make the bills before the Legislature more appealing to the IGA.

“Our members would rather work,” Crawford said. “We don’t want to see millions of dollars that could stay in Iowa go to an out-of-state company.”

Crawford was referring to Caesars Entertainment, which operates the casino and dog track in Council Bluffs. The IGA maintains that Caesars will be the ultimate beneficiary if the mandate in dropped.
But at a news conference at the state Capitol last week, civic leaders from Dubuque and Council Bluffs stressed the local benefits that would come from eliminating the mandate.

As a nonprofit casino, the Mystique’s profits are split between Dubuque and local charities and nonprofits. Ending greyhound racing would increase the casino’s profits by millions each year.

In Council Bluffs, city leaders are eager to have the site of the greyhound racetrack, located at a prime spot near Interstate 80, available for redevelopment.

Leaders from both cities said they wanted to eliminate the dog racing mandate so their casinos can compete more effectively in the increasingly crowded gaming market.

“Greyhound racing is the Blockbuster Video of the gaming industry,” Rick Dickinson, president and CEO of the Greater Dubuque Development Corporation, said at the press conference.

Like Blockbuster, greyhound racing is declining “because the industry is changing around them,” Dickinson said. “Customers have voted with their feet.”

In the past decade, more than half the greyhound tracks in the United States have closed. In addition to the two in Iowa, only 19 remain open, and many of them have added other forms of gambling to help keep the doors open.

That the bills to repeal the greyhound racing mandate seem to be stalled in the Legslature doesn’t surprise Dickinson, a former member of the Iowa House of Representatives.

“The other side is very good,” he told Iowa Watchdog. “They have the best lobbyists, make strategic investments with their campaign contributions and leverage their personal relationships with lawmakers.”

If the greyhound racing mandate does survive the legislative session, civic leaders from Dubuque and Council Bluffs say they will continue to push for its repeal.

And last week, they acquired a powerful ally.

At his weekly press conference, Gov. Terry Branstad called greyhound racing a “dying industry” and said he supported closing the racetracks, as long as the people who work in the racing industry were compensated.

http://watchdog.org/131198/dog-racing-mandate/



Thursday, July 25, 2013

Gilley asks for new sentence in gambling case


Gilley asks for new sentence in gambling case

Published: July 24, 2013
 
 
Alabama Gambling Resentencing Request
FILE - In this Oct. 4, 2010 file photo, Cross Country gaming facility owner Ronnie Gilley leaves the Federal building in Montgomery, Ala. Gilley has asked a federal judge to reduce his prison sentence. Gilley is making the request because he and his Atlanta-based attorney, Amy Weil, claim that his former attorney, David Harrison, provided ineffective counsel. "Attorney Harrison told me that it was in my best interest to plead guilty because, if I pleaded guilty and cooperated, the court would sentence me to probation or, at worst, house arrest," Gilley wrote. " Gilley pleaded guilty in Alabama's gambling corruption investigation and has admitted he was deeply in debt and out of money when he offered millions in bribes to legislators to support pro-gambling legislation.


 
— Former Country Crossing developer Ronnie Gilley has asked a federal judge to reduce his prison sentence.
The Dothan Eagle reported (http://bit.ly/140eKxc ) that Gilley is making the request because he and his Atlanta-based attorney, Amy Weil, claim that his former attorney, David Harrison, provided ineffective counsel.

"Attorney Harrison told me that it was in my best interest to plead guilty because, if I pleaded guilty and cooperated, the court would sentence me to probation or, at worst, house arrest," Gilley wrote.

"Attorney Harrison told me that he could secure a sentence of probation or house arrest because he had a great relationship with the U.S. Attorney's Office."

It has been nearly a year since Gilley was sentenced to 80 months in federal prison for multiple counts of bribery and money laundering in connection with a wide-ranging investigation into bribery tied to proposed gambling legislation.

Gilley's current attorney filed a motion to vacate the sentence, saying his former lawyer misled him on the expected range of his sentence. The motion also says, among other things, that Gilley's former lawyer should have called as a witness one of the FBI's lead investigators on the gambling corruption case.

In the motion, Weil also argued that Gilley's former attorney acknowledged to state officials that he offered bribes of more than $2 million when evidence showed that wasn't the case. Weil said the detail is important because sentencing levels increase with the amount of bribes being offered, and he could have gotten less jail time had his former attorney argued the monetary amount of the bribes.
Harrison said he provided effective counsel and is not surprised by the motion.

"It is something that happens in a lot of cases. I have filed a lot of them before and I have been a subject before. I am used to that. It's part of the system," Harrison told the newspaper.

The motion has been passed on to U.S. Magistrate Judge Wallace Capel.

Gilley is incarcerated in federal prison in Atlanta and has served more than eight months.

http://www.heraldonline.com/2013/07/24/5049790/gilley-asks-for-new-sentence-in.html


Sunday, June 30, 2013

Dead Horse Racing: Why the taxpayer subsidies?


Horse Racing is DEAD! Attendance down, yet states continue to use taxpayer funds to subsidize the DEAD industry. And then taxpayer funds are used to bail out their failures.



Not one single legislator is asking for an INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS.

What other business receives similar subsidies? WHY?







News from the Gambling "Arms Race"

More and more tax breaks and bailouts for racetracks, casinos, and racinos in CT, RI, DE, NJ, where they have found they can't compete with the proliferation of casinos and racinos in the U.S. Nor can they compete with the expansion of existing gambling venues from racing to slots, from slots to table games, from slots & table games to full-blown, over-the-top destination casino resorts. Where will it end?

Now add Internet Gambling in to the mix and throw a match: the tinderbox of our economy is blown to smithereens.
...
(Plainville, MA, remember that Plainridge has already been bailed out by its owners for 14 years without a profit.)


Recent News on Casino/Racino Bailouts:

Bailout for Delaware casinos exposes national problem
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/all-in-/52269868#52269868

America moves to bailout casinos
http://thenewsunit.blogspot.com/2013/06/america-moves-to-bailout-casinos.html

W.Va. casino hosting lawmakers urges tax break (AP)
http://cdcgamingreports.com/w-va-casino-hosting-lawmakers-urges-tax-break-ap/

Chris Christie’s Failed State Capitalism
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-10/chris-christie-s-failed-state-capitalism.html
See More
 
Click on link for video --
 
 June 20, 2013

Bailout for Delaware casinos exposes national problem

A proposed bailout is seen as a rude awakening to taxpayers who are always told that state- approved gambling is a revenue generator. There are now so many casinos in the U.S. that the new ones are hurting the revenue of the older ones. Host Chris Hayes asks Delaware and New York lawmakers if casinos make sense.

 
 
 

Saturday, April 27, 2013

[Any State]'s addiction to gambling - our state needs an intervention


Replace the name of any state because they all believe the myths and propaganda of Predatory Gambling.....just a few more will save the budget, just a few more will save public education, table games will save horse racing.....and on and on and on, ignoring the costs, ignoring failed economic policy.

Note how all of the flawed arguments are identical.

What does it say about the betrayal of the Common Good when government preys on its own citizens?



Matthew Tully: Indiana's addiction to gambling - our state needs an intervention


Apr. 26, 2013



Written by
Matthew Tully

SHELBYVILLE — The sprawling casino here was heavy with the scent of cigarette smoke on a recent morning as hundreds of slot machines occupied gamblers who, it seemed, could be the grandparents of the pretty and handsome twentysomethings smiling from the oversized signs outside.

There isn’t much around the casino — a few cows on a farm in the distance, across the interstate, and a fast-food joint nearby. Those driving onto the casino property these days are greeted by signs on a fence that urge state lawmakers to approve table games run by actual people as opposed to machines.

That would boost revenue and, casino advocates have been relentlessly pointing out for months, create new jobs.

The table games issue was one of several casino-friendly ideas that lawmakers debated this year in the wake of new competition from casinos in other states. One state lawmaker referred to the table games proposal as the biggest jobs bill of the 2013 legislative session, and he was probably right. What a shame.

Wouldn’t it be nice if the industries lawmakers had spent the session trying to protect were in high-tech or other start-up fields that don’t do as much harm to an economy as they do good? Imagine if Indiana, instead of setting out to be a gambling capital two decades ago, had decided it would be the Midwest’s high-tech engine. Imagine if the state legislature spent as much time obsessing over good jobs that truly build an economy as it spends worrying about well-connected casinos, the ones that flood the Statehouse with lobbyists every year.

Our state business is gambling. It has been since the legislature took the easy route to new jobs two decades ago, sprinkling casinos around the state and sitting back as the money poured into state coffers. Now the state is addicted to the cash and lawmakers have to spend valuable time every year trying to protect casinos from competitive advances by counterparts in other states. This addiction leads to bad policies and proposals.

The addiction also leads to ridiculous arguments, such as the one put forward recently in an Evansville Courier editorial that said lawmakers who didn’t race to help Indiana casinos this year were negligently forcing them to “sink or swim without help to combat competition.” Oh, the horror of forcing a business to deal with competition! Listen, if a casino can’t make money, then it has bigger problems than the state legislature can solve.

As the four-month legislative session approached its end, Indiana’s ties to gambling were leading to all sorts of tired Statehouse debates. Should we allow live dealers to staff table games. (Who cares?) Should the phony riverboat law be changed to allow some casinos to move ashore? (Again, who cares?) Should casinos be allowed to give out betting vouchers without paying taxes on them. (Once again, who cares?)

This wouldn’t be so depressing if the legislature had tackled Indiana’s more serious issues this year in thoughtful ways. When I drive around Indiana I look at the landscape and wonder how it’s going to attract better jobs, revitalize dying rural counties and improve schools. I don’t worry much about the needs of casino bosses or factory farms that don’t want animal abuse videotaped — two topics of heavy discussion this session.

Even when the casinos don’t get everything they want, they still dominate the discussion and push more important issues to the side. It’s a distraction with a price.

Indiana is addicted to gambling. It needs an intervention. Its leaders need to tell the casino industry to go away for a while so they can focus on matters that will actually help the state’s future. Because adding a few blackjack dealers in Shelbyville will not be Indiana’s saving grace.

http://www.indystar.com/article/20130426/NEWS08/304260052/Matthew-Tully-Indiana-s-addiction-gambling-our-state-needs-an-intervention

 

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Just Wait for Geoff Freeman!


For those of you who believe that the brick and mortar casinos will be the stopping point of gambling in MA, look at the mission of the new head of the American Gaming Association. A fleecino in every home, school, business, library and any other place with Internet access is the next goal.

Travel association exec to lead US gambling lobby
Posted: Apr 18, 2013 1:40 PM EDT

By HANNAH DREIER
Associated Press
 
LAS VEGAS (AP) - The new head of the U.S. casino lobby is a 38-year-old with ties to the travel industry who says he will seek consensus on Internet gambling.

The American Gaming Association nominated Geoff Freeman as its new president and CEO in Las Vegas Wednesday.

Freeman comes to the gambling lobby from the U.S. Travel Association, where he has been chief operating officer. He will replace president Frank Fahrenkopf, 73, in July.

Among his priorities will be navigating the burgeoning online gambling industry.

"We're going to have to determine if the industry can get on the same page," he said.

Last fall, Fahrenkopf called black market Internet gambling one of the biggest threats to the industry.

The association is pushing for the legalization of online wagering, and some Las Vegas-based casino giants, including Caesars Entertainment, appear to be taking steps to cash in on the market if and when it opens.

Fahrenkopf, who was formerly the chairman of the Republication National Committee, has served as the organization's only president since its founding in 1995.

The lobby has been planning for his departure for two years, and he will stay on as a consultant through at least the end of 2013.

Casinos no longer are just about gambling, and its lobbyists must also understand the travel and hospitality industries, Freeman said.

"Gaming is really taking on a broader image, and that's the image of entertainment. It includes restaurants, shows, hospitality and lodging, and gaming," he said.

Gaming Association board chairman Richard Haddrill said the group will benefit from Freeman's policy background and extensive network of connections in Washington.

Freeman "has the skills to build coalitions and execute grass roots campaigns," said Haddrill, who also is chairman of Bally Technologies Inc.

Freeman graduated from the University of California, Berkeley and worked for the health insurance lobby and the conservative Heritage Foundation earlier in his career.

He will remain based in Washington but will spend time meeting with casino executives around the country.

"I'm going to be ears open to just about anything that anyone has to say," he said.

http://www.keyc.tv/story/22015238/travel-association-exec-to-lead-us-gambling-lobby
 

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Attorney General Strange beefs up lawsuit against Indian casinos



Attorney General Strange beefs up lawsuit against Indian casinos
Posted: Apr 12, 2013
By Tametria Conner




 

MONTGOMERY, AL (WSFA) - Alabama Attorney General Luther strange is beefing up the state's lawsuit against the Poarch Band of Creek Indian's three casinos.

In March, the Indians filed a motion to move the case to federal court. They also asked the court to simply dismiss the case.

Attorney General Strange's latest filing centers on whether the tribe's games are slot machines or bingo machines.

The original suit was filed in February and asked the court to close the Indian casinos in Atmore, Montgomery and Wetumpka.

[DOCUMENT: Attorney General's court filing (.pdf)]

Thursday's filing amends that complaint to clarify the federal aspects of the state's claims. AG Strange wants to shut the casinos down, saying they are operating slot machines which are considered illegal under Alabama law.

The Poarch Creek Indians argue that the attorney general is trying to circumvent federal law and disregard the sovereignty of their land.

http://www.myfoxal.com/story/21949891/attorney-general-strange-beefs-up

Bingo battle heats up as A.G. Luther Strange expands complaint against Poarch Creek
12 Apr 2013 6:33 AM
Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange today returned fire against the Poarch Band of Creek Indians, lodging a multi-pronged legal attack on the tribe's gambling interests in the state.

The new tack was laid out in an amended complaint against the tribe filed today in U.S. District Court in Montgomery. Strange had originally asked an Elmore County Circuit Court judge to shut down the Poarch Band's three casinos on the grounds that they are a public nuisance.

The new complaint was filed after the tribe last month moved the lawsuit to federal court and asked a judge to dismiss it on the grounds that Alabama has no legal right to sue the Poarch Band, a sovereign nation under federal law.

"We have amended the complaint to clarify the federal aspects of the State's claim and to let the court know more about how the Tribe's slot machines ope rate. Amending a complaint is something that happens all the time in the early stages of a lawsuit," said Andrew Brasher, Strange's deputy solicitor general, in an email.

Brasher's statement goes on to suggest that filing the suit in state court at first was a legal rouse designed to limit the tribe's options in court. "We were not surprised that the tribal defendants moved the lawsuit from state court to federal court. This procedural move required the tribal defendants to acknowledge that federal law gives the State a claim against them and to waive several defenses that they could have raised. So, we are not asking the federal court to send the case back to state court; we are asking the federal court to go ahead and consider our claim now," he said.

The latest complaint still claims that the tribe's casinos are a public nuisance under Alabama law, but it expands the legal theater of battle by calling into question the slot-style, electronic bingo machines that the tribe uses.

Unlike private gambling operations, like the recently raided VictoryLand, which are covered by state law, Tribal gambling is governed by the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, commonly referred to as IGRA.

Broadly speaking, IGRA allows federally recognized tribes like the Poarch Band to engage in bingo gambling if bingo gambling is legal elsewhere in the state. In order to engage in slot machines or table games like blackjack and roulette, tribes have to enter into a legal compact with the state.
Bingo is legal in certain Alabama counties, so the Poarch Band has the right to operate bingo halls.

However, the tribe has no compact with the state, and Alabama law specifically prohibits slot-machine gambling, which is what Strange argues is really going on in Poarch Band casinos.
Bingo or Slots? Strange argues slots
IGRA allows tribes to engage in bingo via comp uters or other "technological aids," even if such electronic versions of the game are illegal elsewhere in the state. However, IGRA expressly forbids "electronic or electromechanical facsimiles of any game of chance or slot machines of any kind."

According to Strange's complaint, that's exactly what the Poarch Band's machines are designed to do.

The complaint includes a number of exhibits showing the kinds of "bingo" machines that the Poarch Band uses, noting their resemblance to slot machines. Several of the models, the complaint points out, have both bingo and non-bingo versions that are virtually identical.

An AL.com reporter recently lost $20 to Red Hot Fusion, one of the models cited in the complaint, as he did research on the Wind Creek Casino in Atmore. An avid gamer told him that a Pascagoula casino has the same game, minus the bingo.

As the complaint puts it, "The player does not need to pay attention, listen to alphanumeric designations drawn one-by-one, or match them up to a bingo card. Instead, the player presses a single button, watches slot-machine reels spin, and is told whether he or she has won by the gambling device."

In addition to Strange's argument that th e games themselves are illegal under federal and state law, he also asserts that the tribe's casinos do not sit on federally protected trust land and are thus subject to the state's gambling laws.

The 1934 Indian Reorganization Act gave the federal government the right to take lands of recognized tribes into trust, but the U.S. Supreme Court's 2009 Carcieri decision ruled that the law only applies to tribes that were recognized at the time the act went into law.

Since the Poarch Band was recognized in the 1980s, that means their lands are not actually federally protected, according to Strange.

Some experts have said that the Carcieri decision does not necessarily apply to all tribes, that it would take further legal or administrative changes to undo the trust status of the dozens of tribes that gained federal recognition after 1934.

The tribe will likely file a new response to the state's complaint in the coming weeks.
 
 
 Alabama tribal casino slot machine dispute moves to federal court
The Republic
The Montgomery Advertiser reports (http://on.mgmadv.com/17vyQor ) state officials say the Poarch Creek casinos are feature gambling machines that violate state and federal laws. Officials say operating slot machines is illegal in the state and illegal ...



AG wants federal judge to shut down Indian casinos
Montgomery Advertiser
The state, in the amended complaint filed on Thursday by the office of Attorney General Luther Strange, is seeking to shut down the Poarch Creek casinos by having them declared public nuisances that operate slot machines that are illegal in the state ...


 

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Genting Amends Florida Proposal


Genting project to launch condo sales by 2014

March 15, 2013 10:00AM

Miami Herald building

The Genting Group plans to launch sales as early as next year at their new condominium project at the soon-to-be-redeveloped waterfront headquarters of the Miami Herald, the eponymous paper reported. Genting also hopes to sign with a four-star hotel operator to develop the project’s third tower by year’s end, Bill Thompson, senior vice president of development for Resorts World Miami, told the Herald. The condo tower will include “several hundred units,” the Herald said.
The three towers will run along a 50-foot wide promenade that will connect Genting’s Resorts World Miami project to Museum Park, downtown Miami’s museum development that includes the Patricia and Phillip Frost Museum of Science and the Perez Art Museum of Miami.

“We’ve decided to go with a phased approach,” Thompson told the Herald. “That seems to be more conducive with what’s acceptable in Miami. You start out with the waterfront property and that improves the value across everything else. Then you stay fluid based on what’s happening in the marketplace.” [Miami Herald]Christopher Cameron
 
 

Genting switches casino plans to hotel in Florida March 18, 2013 9:57 AM by Staff & Wire Reports

Malaysia’ Genting Group, successful with a major slots facility adjoining Aqueduct racetrack in New York and the recent buyer of remnants of the failed Echelon development on the Las Vegas Strip from Boyd Gaming Corp., has downsized its plans for a project in Miami, Florida.
Initially, after purchasing The Miami Herald building for $236 million, the company announced grandiose plans for a $3.8 billion project for the 14 acres that would have included a massive casino, skyscrapers, a new three-mile Baywalk, four hotels with a total of 5,200 rooms, and two residential towers.

Unfortunately for the company, the state legislature failed to approve gambling plans for south Florida.

Now, Genting’s Resorts World Miami will offer a more modest development that will focus on a luxury hotel and two condominiums.

According to company spokesman Tadd Schwartz, the first phase will be on the Miami Herald site and will include a few stories of restaurants, shops, meeting rooms and underground parking that will have an open-air vibe. The condos and hotel will sit above that podium.

Obviously, the company still has hopes of getting a casino law passed. To do so, however, it will have to overcome objections from existing casino operators, horse track owners, Disney World and the Florida Chamber of Commerce.

http://www.gamingtoday.com/articles/article/40598-Genting_switches_casino_plans_to_hotel_in_Florida

Friday, February 22, 2013

AG files lawsuit to shut down Indian casinos

Interesting!

AG files lawsuit to shut down Indian casinos

Written by Gannett News Service Feb 19, 2013
Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange filed a lawsuit in Elmore County trying to shut down what he argues are slot machines at the three casinos operated in the state by the Poarch Band of Creek Indians.
While Strange quickly points out that state authorities do not have jurisdiction on tribal land, he argues that the Poarch Creeks are not following state gambling laws and that the “continued operation of unlawful gambling devices by defendants is a public nuisance” that should be stopped by the court.

The Poarch Creeks, in a statement sent out Tuesday afternoon, said the lawsuit has no legal merit.

“As a federally recognized sovereign Indian nation, Poarch Creek’s land is governed by federal, not state law,” according to the Poarch Creek statement. “While we respect Mr. Strange’s attempts to fulfill his duties as state attorney general, he is not a federal official and therefore, has no jurisdiction or enforcement authority over tribal land or tribal gaming operations.”

The Poarch Creeks argued the machines are electronic bingo, which is Class II gambling, and are legal under federal law.

“While Mr. Strange may target VictoryLand and any other gaming facility in the state, this lawsuit against Poarch filed in circuit court is yet another example of Mr. Strange refusing to recognize the sovereignty of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians,” according to the statement from the tribe.

If there is Class II gambling in a state, American Indians are allowed to have the same class, which by federal regulations includes electronic bingo, on their lands. But Strange and others argue the machines are slot machines, which are not Class II.

The state filed the lawsuit against members of the Poarch Creek Tribal Council and against members of the tribal Gaming Authority. The Poarch Creeks operate casinos in Wetumpka, Montgomery and Atmore. They are in the midst of a $246 million expansion of the casino in Wetumpka, adding a 20-story hotel and casino that is scheduled to open in January 2014.

Strange’s office argues the Poarch Band is “operating, advancing, and profiting from unlawful gambling activity at the Creek Casino in Wetumpka, the Wind Creek Casino in Atmore, and the Creek Casino in Montgomery in violation of Article IV, Section 65 of the Alabama Constitution (1901) and Ala. Code § 13A-12-20 et seq.”

State authorities, led by Strange’s office, served a search warrant at VictoryLand on Tuesday and seized hundreds of machines and an undisclosed amount of cash.

Joe Espy, attorney for VictoryLand and casino owner Milton McGregor, said Tuesday that the “lawsuit against the Poarch Creek Indian casino filed today is a smokescreen and a waste of taxpayer money.”

“As he knows, the Alabama attorney general has no jurisdiction over Native American gaming,” Espy said following the law enforcement action at the Macon County casino. “In the short term, all this is going to do is send the customers of VictoryLand to the Poarch Creek Indian facility in Wetumpka.”

Strange said in his statement that he decided to file the lawsuit after other efforts to stop gambling activities by the Poarch Creeks failed and because state law enforcement could not seize machines on reservation land.

“Unlawful gambling is a statewide problem, and I have worked with local authorities to enforce Alabama law consistently and fairly throughout the state,” Strange said. “I have sent two letters to the National Indian Gaming Commission, asking them to stop the Poarch Band’s unlawful gambling, but the commission has refused to do anything about it. The commission’s inaction has left me with no choice but to file this lawsuit.”

Strange sent letters to the National Indian Gaming Commission on Feb. 11, 2011, and on April 25, 2012, asking the commission to take action to stop the use of what Strange and his office believe are slot machines, which are illegal in Alabama, at the Poarch Creek casinos. Others argue the machines are electronic bingo machines that are legal in the state.

“I have lobbied Congress to stop the expansion of Indian gambling to new areas, and I have filed a brief in the Alabama Supreme Court to oppose the Poarch Band’s efforts to use its land for gambling,” Strange said. “As I have said many times, my office will use every tool at its disposal to stop illegal gambling in Alabama, wherever it is located. This lawsuit against the Poarch Band is one of those tools.”

http://www.pnj.com/viewart/20130219/NEWS/130219006/AG-files-lawsuit-shut-down-Indian-casinos

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Massachusetts Sells Itself Cheap

If this surprises anyone in Massachusetts, they haven't been paying attention to the millions the Predatory Gambling Industry spreads around elsewhere to buy support.

And this is merely the beginning.



Lobbyists score $1.1M in state’s casino battle
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
 
Dave Wedge's picture

Seven casino developers battling it out for lucrative state gaming licenses shelled out a combined $1.1 million to lobbyists last year, nearly half of which was spent by the Wampanoag tribe that’s fighting for federal approval of its proposed gaming palace.

The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, which was given an exclusive shot at a southeastern Massachusetts casino, has shelled out more than $500,000 to several lobbyists, including $180,000 to former U.S. Rep. William Delahunt, a Herald review found.

Delahunt’s Capitol Hill contacts could come in handy as the tribe seeks federal approval of its casino deal. The federal Bureau of Indian Affairs rejected the deal the tribe struck with Gov. Deval Patrick last year, but a new compact is being negotiated. Delahunt and a Wampanoag spokeswoman did not return messages.

Of the 11 companies competing for the other two resort casino licenses and the state’s lone slots license, MGM spent the most, doling out $150,000 to Boston law firm Brown Rudnick, records show. Others who reported lobbying payments:

•     Mohegan Sun, which is seeking a casino in Palmer, paid $73,800 to O’Neill and Associates, while Northeast Gaming Group — which owns the land of the proposed Palmer site — paid $45,000 to The Suffolk Group, no relation to Suffolk Downs;

•     Suffolk Downs spent $120,000 on three lobbyists, including $60,000 to former Massachusetts House Speaker Charles F. Flaherty;

•     Penn National, which wants to build a casino in Springfield, paid $50,000 to Shanley Fleming Boksanski & Cahill;

•     Plainridge Racecourse, a harness horse track in Plainville seeking a slots license, paid $73,000 to three lobbying firms: Bartley Law Office, Burke Strategies and Kraus & Hummel; and

•     Massachusetts Gaming and Entertainment LLC, a newly formed company tied to Chicago casino tycoon Neil Bluhm’s Rush Street Gaming, shelled out $80,000 to Boston strategists Rasky Baerlein. Bluhm has yet to say if it is seeking a slots or casino license, nor has it revealed a site.
Boston College public policy professor Richard McGowan said lobbyists will be key for gaming companies to monitor the state gaming board, as well as new laws or regulations.

“The industry realizes that the Legislature has never been able to stay out of revenue producing,” McGowan said. “Look how it revised the lottery payouts once they grew more than expected. I have a feeling they realize the same is true with casinos.”

The state gaming board allows its panelists to meet with lobbyists or company executives but is crafting new rules now that applications are filed, spokeswoman Elaine Driscoll said.
 

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

New York: Another Harebrained Scheme

Folks have come up with some cock-a-mammy ideas to justify the community destruction that accompanies Predatory Gambling and promote the idea to the public, but New York deserves an award for this one!



NY proposal: Use some casino revenue to fund NY campaigns in effort to limit money in politics


Article by: MICHAEL GORMLEY, Associated Press
Updated: January 7, 2013

ALBANY, N.Y. - An innovative proposal expected in the New York Legislature would take some revenue from casino promoters and opponents who spend millions in campaign contributions and create a fund designed to reduce the influence of money in politics.

Good-government advocate Bill Samuels and Democratic state Sen. Liz Krueger said Monday that the money from the proposal expected to be introduced to the new Legislature would pay for voluntary public funding of campaigns and level the playing field for candidates, creating more competitive elections. They say it would also open politics to more people without depending on large contributions from special interests.

It may also be a unique way to channel gambling money. A dozen states use casino tax revenue most often for education, local governments, and the state general fund, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. New Jersey uses some for financial assistance to the elderly and disabled, while Colorado and South Dakota target some for historic preservation, and Puerto Rico uses some for tourism.

New York's so-called "grand bargain" would seek to tap into an anticipated deluge of campaign contributions from supporters and opponents of the proposal to allow casinos on non-Indian land in New York. The call for a publicly paid, matching fund system, as in New York City, has grown louder nationwide after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a freer hand for corporations and other well-financed interests to fund massive TV ad blitzes under the Citizens United decision in 2010.

http://www.startribune.com/nation/185942812.html?refer=y

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Ex-Lobbyist Linked To Ala. Gambling Corruption Attacked In Prison



Lawyers: Ex-Lobbyist Linked To Ala. Gambling Corruption Attacked In Prison

 
File photo of a jail cell. (credit: SONNY TUMBELAKA/AFP/Getty Images)
File photo of a jail cell. (credit: SONNY TUMBELAKA/AFP/Getty Images)
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) — Lawyers for a former lobbyist convicted for his role in Alabama’s gambling corruption case say he’s been attacked while serving his sentence behind bars.

Attorneys for former Country Crossing casino lobbyist Jarrod Massey filed court documents requesting to see their client. WBRC-TV reports that the lawyers don’t know his medical condition.
The Dothan Eagle reports that Massey was attacked at the Maxwell Federal Prison Camp in Montgomery and has been moved to another facility.

His lawyers say in court papers that they’ve attempted to contact the Bureau of Prisons to assess their client’s medical condition, but those efforts have been unsuccessful.

Massey is serving a sentence of five years and five months in prison after a massive investigation into public corruption associated with gambling in Alabama.


http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2012/12/07/lawyers-ex-lobbyist-linked-to-ala-gambling-corruption-attacked-in-prison/

Saturday, December 8, 2012

When NO! Never Means NO!


Even though Florida voters said "NO!" Genting refuses to take "NO!" for an answer, salivating to invade Florida filled with tourists' dollars and waiting to suck discretionary dollars from Massachusetts with a tax-free Tribal Casino.  

Keep watching!


Florida voters won't decide fate of big casinos

By Gary Fineout on December 07, 2012


TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — Florida's gambling future, including the fate of its horse and dog tracks, Internet cafes and tribal-run casinos, appears likely to be decided by the Republican-controlled Legislature.

After spending nearly $1 million on an effort to let voters decide what kind of gambling to allow, a major casino developer has decided to work with legislators over the next two years.

Companies affiliated with Genting, the Malaysian gambling powerhouse, had poured money this year into a political committee that hired consultants, lawyers and a company known for collecting voter signatures for constitutional amendments.

But Genting executives this week met with legislative leaders to tell them they would not move forward on the amendment to allow casino gambling.

Instead they want to see what emerges from a promised comprehensive look at gambling to be launched by GOP leaders.

"Hopefully something will come from that that makes sense," said Brian Ballard, a Tallahassee lobbyist who represents a Genting subsidiary. "We want to work with them. We want it to be a collaborative process."

Genting has already spent nearly a half-billion dollars to acquire real estate in downtown Miami for a proposed mega resort. But efforts to get state legislators to approve a bill to allow major casinos in South Florida have failed during the past two years.

This past year there was a push for legislation that would have granted casino licenses to developers who pledged to spend at least $2 billion on a resort. It was one of the most heavily lobbied bills of the 2012 session and drew opposition from such heavyweights as the Florida Chamber of Commerce and Disney.

After the last legislative defeat, Genting began considering whether to ask voters to approve casino gambling.

Florida voters three times in the past have rejected constitutional amendments to allow casino gambling. But voters approved a measure in 2004 to give South Florida counties the ability to decide whether to add slot machines to existing dog and horse tracks.

Since that vote, gambling has expanded in the state. Voters in both Miami-Dade and Broward counties voted in favor of adding slots to local tracks and the state reached deals that have allowed casinos owned by the Seminole Tribe of Florida to expand.

New Senate President Don Gaetz, R-Niceville, has established a stand-alone legislative committee to look at gambling issues over the next two years.

Sen. Garrett Richter, R-Naples and chairman of the new committee, said he plans to hire a firm to do an extensive study of gambling in the state and the potential impact of any changes.

Richter said his goal is to come up with something that will "minimize any regrets" with whatever lawmakers decide. Richter also said it is likely the committee will hold hearings on gambling in several locations around the state.
___
Follow Gary Fineout on Twitter: http://twitter.com/fineout

http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-12-07/florida-voters-wont-decide-fate-of-big-casinos

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

How come Gambling = Corruption?







Ford files ethics complaint against attorney general


Victory Land Johnny Ford

Credit: Cliff Williams Opelika-Auburn News

Tuskegee Mayor Johnny Ford

Hours after being officially sworn to his eighth term as Tuskeagee’s mayor on Monday, Johnny Ford filed an ethics complaint with the U.S. Attorney’s Office against Alabama Attorney Gen. Luther Strange, alleging that Strange has received more than $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions from Porch Creek Indian casinos in Montgomery and Wetumpka.
 
“Now that he is attorney general, he has used his office to try and intimidate, discourage … Victoryland from reopening,” Ford said Tuesday, asking the U.S. Attorney George L. Beck to empanel a grand jury to investigate the matter.
 
Located in Shorter, only a few miles from Tuskegee, VictoryLand casino was closed in 2010 along with Dothan’s Country Crossing after the legality of electronic bingo machines at the facilities was challenged.
 
Ford said his latest complaint against Strange is actually the second he has filed since filing an initial complaint against him with the Alabama State Ethics Commission two weeks ago.
 
Contacted by the Opelika-Auburn News on Tuesday, Joy Patterson, a spokeswoman for Strange, said Strange had not seen Ford’s letter and had no comment.
 
Ford said the type of electronic bingo machines that VictoryLand uses are in compliance with the state’s laws.
 
“No court has voted that those machines are illegal,” Ford said. “The only person who has said they were was (former Gov.) Bob Riley and his task force. Ford said he also has proof of Strange sending letters to providers of such machines, threatening that if they made them available to VictoryLand and other non-Indian gaming facilities in the state, that they would be penalized. Riley, his son, Rob, Birmingham attorney Eric Johnston and state Sen. Bryan Taylor are also named in Ford’s complaint.
Ford, who said he plans to meet with Beck after he’s had a chance to review the letter, predicted VictoryLand will reopen by the end of the year.
 

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Lobbyist sentenced to probation in Vote Buying Scandal




Lobbyist Jennifer Pouncy gets 3 years probation in gambling corruption case

She was the last of 3 to be sentenced in bribery case


Sep. 27, 2012

Judge sentences casino lobbyist: A federal judge sentenced former casino lobbyist Jennifer Pouncy on Wednesday. Her attorney discusses the sentence and her role.

Written by Sebastian Kitchen

Jennifer Pouncy walks from the Federal Courthouse in Montgomery, Ala. on Wednesday September 26, 2012 with her attorney Tommy Spina after Pouncy was given probation for her part in the gambling corruption trial. (Montgomery Advertiser, Mickey Welsh)
Jennifer Pouncy walks from the Federal Courthouse in Montgomery, Ala. on Wednesday September 26, 2012 with her attorney Tommy Spina after Pouncy was given probation for her part in the gambling corruption trial. (Montgomery Advertiser, Mickey Welsh) / Mickey Welsh/Advertiser



A federal judge sentenced Jennifer Pouncy, the last of three people who pleaded guilty to bribing state lawmakers to pass gambling legislation, to a much lighter sentence than those who worked alongside her.

Chief Judge Keith Watkins sentenced the former casino lobbyist Wednesday to three years probation.

The Montgomery woman, who was the first target in the investigation to cooperate and to plead guilty, could have served as much as five years in prison after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy. Prosecutors requested a sentence of two years in prison.

Pouncy, 36, admitted offering one state senator $2 million in exchange for his vote on pro-gambling legislation and to working with a casino developer to authorize $100,000 for another state senator in exchange for his vote.

Watkins said her actions undermined government and people’s confidence in government in this state, and he was not minimizing the seriousness of her crimes, but he said she has suffered humiliation, lost earnings, was the first to cooperate with federal investigators, and provided substantial assistance that helped lead to the guilty pleas of two other defendants, lobbyist Jarrod Massey and Country Crossing developer Ronnie Gilley.

Pouncy declined comment as she left the federal courthouse Wednesday.

Pouncy, who briefly addressed the judge in the courtroom, fought back tears as she said she was sorry for her crimes and knew they were wrong when she did them. She apologized to her husband, who was in the courtroom, and her 3-year-old son for putting them through the situation.

“I wish I was stronger,” said Pouncy, who said she wishes she had initially just told people no.

Pouncy’s defense attorney, Tommy Spina, said Pouncy was not a ring leader in the conspiracy and acted on the orders of others.

“She was just a puppet and an attractive young lady they used,” he said to the judge.

Spina said she was the mother of a young son in a double-earner family where she was the “bread winner” and was trying to keep a $60,000-a-year job. She currently works for an agency that deals with veterinary products, he added.

(Page 2 of 4)

The attorney also said that other than those 30 days in 2010 she had lived an exemplary life.

Spina said they were relieved she received probation, said that chapter of her life was over, and said “she’ll just go back to work being a mother and the hard-working person that she always was before this and has been since this.”

Pouncy has not been asked for assistance in any other investigations, Spina said.

Attorneys said during sentencing for Massey and Gilley that they had cooperated with a state investigation.

Watkins said there was no benefit to society in sending Pouncy to prison. Spina agreed.

“I don’t find she had any involvement in planning” the corrupt activities, Watkins said and added that she had a minor role in the activities. Pouncy said on the witness stand during one of the trials that she did not have the authority to approve campaign contributions.

Federal prosecutor Emily Rae Woods of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section said it is clear Pouncy regrets her crimes, but the punishment must reflect the seriousness of her crimes. She said Pouncy’s actions undermined the system of government in Alabama and said she offered bribes of more than $1 million.

The judge also ordered Pouncy to pay a $4,000 fine, but did not order her to pay restitution, saying no one suffered a financial loss because of her crimes.

He also ordered her to perform 100 hours of community service.

Pouncy pleaded guilty in September 2010, days before federal agents arrested 11 other people including VictoryLand owner Milton McGregor, Gilley, Massey, other lobbyists, and four state senators for their alleged role in a conspiracy in which, according to federal authorities, casino interests offered millions in bribes to lawmakers in exchange for their votes on pro-gambling legislation.

Other than those who pleaded guilty, none of the other defendants were found guilty in the two federal corruption trials related to gambling in the state.

Massey, who was Pouncy’s boss and the chief lobbyist for Country Crossing, and Gilley were among those arrested in October 2010 and they later pleaded guilty. Pouncy testified that, as a young mother, she acted on their orders out of fear she could lose her job.

(Page 3 of 4)

Spina said that there was “not one act Jennifer committed that she initiated.”

Prosecutors credited Pouncy with being responsible for Massey pleading guilty and partially responsible for Gilley pleading guilty.

Another federal judge sentenced Massey to five years and five months in prison and Gilley to more than six and a half years in prison. Massey is serving his sentence and Gilley is scheduled to begin his early next month after his term was delayed so he could undergo surgery and recovery.

Pouncy testified that she offered then-state Sen. Jim Preuitt, R-Talladega, $2 million in exchange for his vote on the gambling legislation being considered by the Senate in the 2010 legislative session. Preuitt was a defendant in the case, but was found not guilty of all of the charges.

She also said that then-state Sen. Larry Means, D-Attalla, told her at that time that he was going through a tough re-election fight and needed $100,000.

Pouncy testified that she went to Massey, who called Gilley and told the developer they were getting a “shakedown” from Means. Gilley approved contributing the money to Means, although there was never any transfer of money to either senator. Means, also a defendant, was found not guilty of the charges against him.

Prosecutors portrayed the gambling interests as desperate as they tried to pass the gambling legislation in 2009 and 2010 to try to protect their financial future and keep their casinos open.

“She stood to gain nothing financially,” Spina said.

Pouncy, whose first job in lobbying was working for McGregor lobbyist Milo Dakin, said on the witness stand that in her 12 or 13 years of lobbying she had never talked before about votes in exchange for contributions.

Defense attorneys attacked what they said were credibility issues with Pouncy and inconsistencies in her testimony.

Pouncy testified at both of the federal corruption trials, where she was emotional at times as she underwent heavy questioning from defense attorneys during a total of seven days on the witness stand.

(Page 4 of 4)

She also had to answer questions concerning demeaning conversations about her and about Massey telling her to tell Preuitt she could lose her job if the bill did not pass. She said she never told him.

Spina said Pouncy had to endure personal attacks on her morality based on what men said behind her back while she was working. Federal agents secretly recorded phone lines used by Gilley, Massey and McGregor. The conversations about her that were played in court were between Gilley and Massey.

Massey and Pouncy testified that he placed her on administrative leave and then fired her in 2010.

Massey said she was often sick, was emotional and that he was concerned about her cooperating with authorities because of her behavior.

Woods said the trial experience was a “particularly taxing one for the government witnesses,” noting the number of defendants and countless defense attorneys. She also said, because of the media attention on the case, that the witnesses were under an unusual level of exposure.

An FBI agent and an agent with the Alabama Bureau of Investigation approached Pouncy on her way to work the day after the Senate approved the gambling legislation in 2010. She immediately went with them to an office where they began questioning her. Pouncy began cooperating in April 2010.

“She has done everything that has been asked of her,” Woods said, adding that Pouncy’s testimony was truthful, that she was respectful on the witness stand, and that she appeared remorseful and humbled by the situation.

Spina said the cooperation was timely and was provided as the investigation continued and as the grand jury was meeting to consider charges.

Click on link to view video:
http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/20120927/NEWS02/309260053/Lobbyist-Jennifer-Pouncy-gets-3-years-probation-gambling-corruption-case?odyssey=tab%7Ctopnews%7Ctext%7CFrontpage

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Alabama Vote Buying Lobbyist Seeks Probation




Alabama gambling lobbyist seeks probation
PHILLIP RAWLS, Associated Press
Monday, September 24, 2012

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The first person to plead guilty in Alabama's gambling corruption investigation is seeking probation, but federal prosecutors are recommending two years in prison.

Former Country Crossing casino lobbyist Jennifer Pouncy is scheduled for sentencing Wednesday in Montgomery by U.S. District Judge Keith Watkins. She pleaded guilty to conspiracy in September 2010 and faces up to five years in prison. She admitted offering $2 million to one senator and $100,000 to another to support pro-gambling legislation designed to keep the Dothan casino operating.

Her attorney, Tommy Spina, recently filed court papers saying she deserves probation because of her early cooperation with investigators and her testimony at two trials. He said the U.S. Justice Department initially offered her probation for her cooperation, but then took that off the table when the department's Public Integrity Section got a new leader.

He also said nothing would be served by taking the 36-year-old woman away from her husband and young son.

Federal prosecutors filed court papers Monday saying Pouncy deserves a lighter-than-normal sentence because she helped get the guilty pleas of her lobbyist boss, Jarrod Massey, and Country Crossing developer Ronnie Gilley. But they said she deserves two years behind bars because she was motivated by greed to keep her job and retain her biggest lobbying client.

"A sentence of imprisonment will properly promote respect for the law, serving as a reminder of the seriousness with which our system of government treats threats to its integrity," Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer said.

Massey is serving a sentence of five years and five months in prison. Gilley begins a sentence of six years and eight months on Oct. 9.

Former Democratic Rep. Terry Spicer of Elba pleaded guilty to taking bribes from Massey and Gilley, but he was not connected to Pouncy. He is serving four years and nine months in prison.

The senators that Pouncy said she tried to bribe were acquitted at trial.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Alabama-gambling-lobbyist-seeks-probation-3889311.php#ixzz27VWJzfEC

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Same Script, Different Product



Worth watching for the similarities to the Predatory Gambling Industy -- the script is the same --

Posted on facebook -

A tobacco industry lobbyist dying of smoking-induced cancer, explains how he lobbied for the tobacco industry and lied --

http://archive.org/details/tobacco_fiy27a00

Saturday, June 23, 2012

Legalized Corruption of Government Exposed by Abramoff






CLICK HERE FOR Real Writing Jobs Former lobbyist Jack Abramoff (who spent time in prison after pleading guilty to corrupting public officials) exposed how the U.S. government is legally corrupted. The Young Turks Cenk Uygur breaks down clips from his 60 Minutes interview.



Jack Abramoff

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jack Abramoff (/ˈeɪbrəmɒf/; born February 28, 1959) is an American former lobbyist, businessman, movie producer and writer.[1][2] He was at the heart of an extensive corruption investigation that led to his conviction and to 21 persons either pleading guilty or being found guilty,[3] including White House officials J. Steven Griles and David Safavian, U.S. Representative Bob Ney, and nine other lobbyists and Congressional aides.
Abramoff was College Republican National Committee National Chairman from 1981 to 1985, a founding member of the International Freedom Foundation, allegedly financed by apartheid South Africa,[4][5] and served on the board of directors of the National Center for Public Policy Research, a conservative think tank. From 1994 to 2001 he was a top lobbyist for the firm of Preston Gates & Ellis, and then for Greenberg Traurig until March 2004.
After a guilty plea in the Indian lobbying scandal and his dealings with SunCruz Casinos in January 2006, he was sentenced to six years in federal prison for mail fraud, conspiracy to bribe public officials, and tax evasion. He served four years before being released on December 3, 2010.[6] After his release from prison, he wrote the book Capitol Punishment: The Hard Truth About Corruption From America's Most Notorious Lobbyist which was published in November 2011.
Abramoff's lobbying and the surrounding scandals and investigation are the subject of two 2010 films: the documentary Casino Jack and the United States of Money, released in May 2010,[7] and the feature film Casino Jack, released on December 17, 2010, starring Kevin Spacey as Abramoff.[8][9]


Choctaw Gambling
In 1995, Abramoff began representing Indian tribes with gambling interests. He became involved with the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians. One of Abramoff's first acts as a tribal gaming lobbyist was to defeat a Congressional bill to tax Indian casinos, sponsored by Bill Archer (R-TX) and Ernest Istook (R-OK). According to Washington Business Forward, a lobbying trade magazine, "Tom DeLay was a major factor in those victories, and the fight helped cement the alliance between the two men".[29] DeLay has called Abramoff "one of (his) closest and dearest friends".
The Washington Post, on December 29, 2005, reported: "Jack Abramoff liked to slip into dialogue from The Godfather as he led his lobbying colleagues in planning their next conquest on Capitol Hill. In a favorite bit, he would mimic an ice-cold Michael Corleone facing down a crooked politician's demand for a cut of Mafia gambling profits: 'Senator, you can have my answer now if you like. My offer is this: nothing.'"[30]
Salon.com political writer Thomas Frank considers Abramoff to have acted as a con man.[31][32] In an appearance with former U.S. Representative Bob Ney and former Greenberg Traurig lobbyist Neil Volz on Kojo Nnamdi's National Public Radio affiliate WAMU-FM radio show, Alex Gibney, director and writer of the 2010 film Casino Jack and the United States of Money elaborated on Abramoff's criminal modus operandi. Gibney remarked, "one of his (Abramoff's) great gifts was being able to tell people what they wanted to hear, and this was how he was able to sell things and get them into trouble."


Later lobbying efforts involved mailings from a Ralph Reed marketing company to Christian conservative voters and bribery of Roger Stillwell, a Department of the Interior official who in 2006 pleaded guilty to accepting gifts from Abramoff.

eLottery, Inc.
In 1999, eLottery hired Abramoff to block the Internet Gambling Prohibition Act, which he did by enlisting Reed, Norquist, and Tom DeLay's former chief of staff, Tony Rudy.[39]
Emails from 2000 show that Susan Ralston helped Abramoff pass checks from eLottery to Lou Sheldon's Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) and also to Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), in route to Reed's company, Century Strategies.[40][41]

Tribal lobbying


Abramoff's Tribal Clients
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla IndiansCherokee Nation of Oklahoma
Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana
Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana
Mashpee Wampanoag people of Massachusetts
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians
Pueblo of Sandia
Pueblo of Santa Clara
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe
Tigua Indian Reservation



Around the time he joined Greenberg Traurig, Abramoff's choice of lobbying clients changed to focus much more on Native American tribes. While Abramoff was a registered lobbyist for 51 clients while working at Preston Gates, with only four being tribes, Abramoff would eventually represent 24 clients for whom he was registered lobbyist at Greenberg Traurig, of which seven were tribes.


On May 9, 2001, Chief Raul Garza of the Kickapoo tribe of Texas met with Bush, with Abramoff and Norquist in attendance. Abramoff was identified in the background of a photo taken at the meeting.[63] Days before the meeting, the tribe paid $25,000 to Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform at Abramoff's direction. According to the organization's communications director, John Kartch, the meeting was one of several gatherings with Bush sponsored by ATR. On the same day, the chief of the Louisiana Coushattas also attended an ATR-sponsored gathering with Bush. The Coushattas also gave $25,000 to ATR soon before the event.

The details of the Kickapoo meeting and a letter dated May 10, 2001, from ATR thanking the Kickapoos for their contribution were revealed to the New York Times in 2006 by former council elder Isidro Garza, who with Raul Garza (no relation), is under indictment in Texas for embezzling tribal money. According to Isidro Garza, Abramoff did not say the donation was required to meet Bush; the White House denied any knowledge of the transaction.[64]

SunCruz Casinos fraud conviction
On August 11, 2005, Abramoff and Adam Kidan were indicted by a federal grand jury in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on fraud charges arising from a 2000 deal to buy SunCruz Casinos from Konstantinos "Gus" Boulis. Abramoff and Kidan are accused of using a fake wire transfer to make lenders believe that they had made a $23 million down payment, in order to qualify for a $60 million loan.[74] Kidan received the same sentence as Abramoff — 5 years, 10 months — which he began serving at Fort Dix Federal Penetentiary, in Fort Dix, New Jersey, on October 23, 2006. Ney also was implicated in helping to consummate the deal.
After the partners purchased SunCruz in September 2000, the business relationship with Boulis deteriorated, culminating in a fistfight between Kidan and Boulis in December 2000. In February 2001 Boulis was murdered in his car in a Mafia-style attack. The murder investigation, which presently includes three mobsters who had received payments from Kidan, is ongoing. Two of the suspects face the death penalty. SunCruz is now owned and operated by Oceans Casinos Cruises.
On January 4, 2006, Abramoff pleaded guilty to conspiracy and wire fraud in Miami, related to the SunCruz deal. The plea agreement called for a maximum sentence of over seven years and would run simultaneously with the sentence in the Washington corruption case, but could be reduced if Abramoff cooperates fully. The remaining four counts in the Florida indictment were dismissed.[75]
On March 29, 2006, Abramoff and Kidan were both sentenced in the SunCruz case to the minimum amount, 70 months, and to pay US$21.7 million in restitution. According to the "memorandum in aid of sentencing", the sentencing judge, U.S. District Judge Paul C. Huck, received over 260 pleas for leniency from various people, including "rabbis, military officers and even a professional hockey referee."[76] The defendants are still cooperating with federal investigators and will be sentenced later in the Indian lobbying case.