Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label drunks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drunks. Show all posts

Sunday, March 9, 2014

Casinos and Booze Are Bound to Make You Lose — Two Cases in Point



Casinos and Booze Are Bound to Make You Lose — Two Cases in Point

Sat March 08 2014



George Lopez passed out on the floor of a Canadian casino.

Casinos and booze is bound to make you lose.




Mark A. Johnston of Ventura, California, asserts that he shouldn’t have to pay a $500,000 debt to the Downtown Grand Las Vegas Hotel & Casino because casino employees served him so much alcohol that he suffered a blackout and was unable to remember the losses or even his gambling, the lawsuit alleges.

The lawsuit says the man was too drunk to be allowed to gambling, and that the casino should have recognized his condition and stopped his gambling. Documents claim the plaintiff was “Dropping chips on the floor, confusing chip colors, and slurring his speech badly. And he was unable to read his cards.”


http://www.arlingtoncardinal.com/2014/03/casinos-and-booze-are-bound-to-make-you-lose-two-cases-in-point/

Sunday, November 17, 2013

Milford: NO Thing to gain!

Foxwoods has SOOOO much baggage.....this exemplifies ....


REPEAL THE CASINO DEAL!






Seaver, Trettel: Protect Milford from casino
Posted Nov 16, 2013



We urge all Milford residents to consider the substantial price we will pay if we allow a casino to be built in the midst of our residential community.

A casino will double our entire population almost daily, halting traffic on our local roads and highways. Traffic snarls will not only delay our daily drives to the grocery store, but also our commutes to work and home on I-495 when traffic backs up all the way past the Mass Pike.

Property values all over town will likely drop. Even the chairman of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission thinks so.

Water is a precious natural resource, and Milford has a limited supply. Foxwoods would take a substantial portion of our reserve.

Casinos generate much more crime than anyone cares to admit. Imagine seven million more people in Milford each year! DUIs, embezzlement, and prostitution will be a guaranteed new fact of life. No amount of casino revenue could be worth having a loved one critically injured by a driver who drank too much at the casino.

The casino payments are simply a combination of taxes, which every business pays, and mitigation.

Mitigation is the money we are being promised in exchange for the damages a casino will inflict on our quality of life by creating daily headaches on our roads, lowering our home values, overburdening our schools and hospital, compromising our water supply, and most importantly, putting our families at risk.

Let us stand together to protect ourselves, our kids, and our grandkids. Every vote will count in this critical referendum. Please join us at the polls on Nov. 19 and vote NO!

JOHN SEAVER
STEVE TRETTEL
Milford


Read more: http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/opinions/letters_to_the_editor/x915445002/Seaver-Trettel-Protect-Milford-from-casino#ixzz2kwzhaQAZ
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Non-Commercial
Follow us: @metrowestdaily on Twitter | MetroWestDailyNews on Facebook

Thursday, July 11, 2013

The Palmer Boozerino!

Yup! 24/7/365!




Northeast Realty requests additional liquor licenses for Palmer property
By Lori Stabile, The Republican
on July
  • Northeast Realty requests additional liquor licenses for Palmer property
  • Mohegan Sun releases four traffic options for proposed $1 billion resort casino in Palmer
  • Massachusetts State Police: Camper trailer rollover causing delays on Massachusetts Turnpike in Palmer
  • Palmer town councilor wants details on Mohegan Sun's traffic plans for proposed casino; Mohegan Sun says details will be released Wednesday
  • Palmer Town Council suspends balloon test for proposed casino hotel


  • PALMER — Northeast Realty has asked for additional liquor licenses as part of its development along Thorndike Street (Route 32) near Mohegan Sun's proposed resort casino site.

    Town Council President Philip J. Hebert acknowledged the letter from Northeast Realty's lawyer, Stephen E. Spelman, at Monday's Town Council meeting.

    The letter asks for two additional liquor licenses for phase 1 of its development project at Thorndike and Shearer streets, also known as the "triangle" area, and four additional liquor licenses as part of phase 2 of the project, which includes creating a lifestyle center on property adjoining the casino site.
    Northeast is leasing 152 acres to Mohegan for the casino project.

    Executive Assistant Andrew Golas said there are 38 liquor licenses in town – 20 for restaurants and bars and 18 for package stores. Town Manager Charles T. Blanchard said he believes the town is at its maximum for liquor licenses; the Legislature must be petitioned before additional licenses can be awarded.

    Blanchard said the state Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission has been contacted to find out what the process is for granting additional licenses. He said this was done out of courtesy.

    "We want to find out if we ever have an option to increase the number of licenses," Blanchard said.

    "We're just looking into the situation. We're not saying we agree."

    James L. St. Amand, Northeast's community liaison, said, "We want to be in a position to have economic development with or without a casino."

    040209 leon dragone.JPGLeon Dragone

    Northeast is in partnership with Cardinal's View of Grove Street, Worcester, for this development. Cardinal's View lists its resident agent as Thomas Cunningham and managers as Leon H. Dragone and Jeffrey E. Cunningham, according to filings with the Secretary of State's office. Dragone is the manager of Northeast Realty.

    The former icehouse property on Shearer Street, targeted as part of Northeast's development, is owned by Cunningham Equities, according to town of Palmer property records. The head of Cunningham Equities, also based on Grove Street in Worcester, is Jeffrey Cunningham. Dragone said he owns a 50 percent stake in the old Rondeau property. Previously, the property was owned by another Cunningham business venture, KSJ Realty.

    Dragone said Cunningham refurbished the HPAC building at 306 Race St., Holyoke, which is being used by the Sisters of Providence Health System, and also developed 18 units known as Cardinal's Ridge in Worcester.

    Northeast is calling the development of this area "The Gateway to Western Massachusetts" and has announced plans for a Pride gas station and convenience store there, as well as restaurants and a medical office building. That development will take place on 20 acres abutting the turnpike exit 8.

    Northeast also owns an additional 110 acres next to the casino site that it plans to develop as part of phase 2 of its project - that development will include a lifestyle center with a mixture of indoor and outdoor attractions, as well as retail shops and an outdoor skating rink. Dragone has said it will resemble "Downtown Disney."

    The map below shows Thorndike and Shearer streets, also known as the "triangle" area, where Northeast Realty has asked for two additional liquor licenses for phase 1 of its development project near the proposed Mohegan Sun Massachusetts casino:


    View Larger Map


    http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2013/07/northeast_realty_requests_addi.html

     

    Friday, June 21, 2013

    The True Costs of A Slot Barn in Plainville

    These are not the only costs. Being ignored is lack of water and waste water treatment - 2 costly items.

    From the Plainville Gambling Consultant's report

    PROBLEM GAMBLING:
    "Opening a 1,250 machine slot parlor at the Plainridge Racecourse is expected to increase the problem and pathological gambling rate, for those living within 10 miles of the facility and within the first three years of operations, by approximately 44%. This could lead to an additional 100 Town citizens developing a gambling problem and another 5200 Norfolk County residents developing a gambling problem."
     

    CRIME:
    "The opening of the proposed slot parlor at the Plainridge Racecourse is anticipated to result in a slight increase in reported crimes. Police activity may increase by 5% to 10% placing some additional demand on the Plainville Police Department. The majority of the increased activity is expected to result from a larger volume of motor vehicle incidents including accidents and DUIs, an increase number of property crimes, and an increase in domestic dispute calls. In terms of social impact, the most serious occurrences are anticipated to be suicides and family disputes; in most instances, gambling addiction is a prominent factor.

    "The below figures represent anticipated changes in activity volume for the Town of Plainville’s Police Department based primarily on studies described in the SEIG Report as good or excellent. IT IS IMPORTANT TO CONSIDER THAT THESE ESTIMATES DO NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL PREVALENCE OR INCREASES IN GAMBLING-RELATED CRIME AS THESE ESTIMATES ARE BASED ON CRIME REPORT STATISTICS, WHICH ARE BELIEVED TO GREATLY UNDERESTIMATE THE ACTUAL AMOUNT OF GAMBLING RELATED CRIME THAT TAKES PLACE. [emphasis added] For example, for persons entering gambling treatment centers in Oregon, 34% reported to have committed an illegal act related to their gambling while only 3% report any legal problems and only 1.5% reported being incarcerated as a result of their gambling.153 This suggests that gambling related crimes captured by crime report statistics may only represent the tip of the iceberg of all gambling related offenses."


    ALCOHOL-RELATED ACCIDENTS: "Driving under the influence is another possible ill effect of casinos and racinos (race tracks at which slot machines are available for gamblers). A recent study found that rural or moderately sized counties with casinos saw an increase in alcohol-related fatalities."

    Friday, April 5, 2013

    Milford: Monday, April 8th at 7:00 PM

    The Financially Mismanaged Connecticut Tribe that DEFAULTED on their debt [simply stopped paying] is salivating to invade Milford and can't wait to present their ideas to bring low wage jobs, increased crime and community destruction to the region.

    


    Gambling Addiction doubles within a 50 mile radius and then again within a 10 mile radius.

    In Connecticut, Foxwoods contributed to the DRUNKS on their roads by providing FREE ALCOHOL, making each of us an innocent target. Is this what we want our communities to become?

    Please consider attending this meeting ---

    Hi All,

    Save the Date! Monday, April 8th at 7:00 PM
    Representatives from Foxwoods Casino will be presenting their proposed plans for building a $1 billion destination resort casino in Milford to the Board of Selectmen on Monday, April 8th at 7:00 PM at Milford Town Hall. Unlike the meeting held on March 18th, this meeting will be held in the large hall upstairs. YOU WILL get a seat!
    We urge every resident of Milford and every Friend of Casino-Free Milford member to attend this critical meeting. If you are uncertain about the impact of a destination resort casino on Milford, then please come to learn what Foxwoods has proposed.
    And we also invite you to STAND WITH US. We want to respectfully show our Selectmen and the casino developers that we want to KEEP MILFORD CASINO FREE! Bring your friends and neighbors and wear RED to show your support! Come early if you can to stand with us outside—bring your own sign or hold one of ours! We will be gathering at 4:00 PM outside the front of Town Hall to hold signs until the meeting begins at 7:00 PM.

    Also, please be aware of the following when attending a board of selectmen meeting:


    Citizen Participation is early in the meeting and is meant to encourage the exchange of information between the Board and the public. This section of the agenda is provided for those who are not scheduled as a formal part of the meeting. Approval may be granted as time may permit, with no guarantee the Board will be able to hear everyone wishing to speak during Citizen Participation.
    Typically it is anticipated that there will be only one topic presented by each person. Since no specific time is allotted for this portion of the agenda it’s best to limit to 5 minutes. The Chairperson is granted the discretion to allow an extension of time if deemed necessary.
    When practically possible it is a good idea to notify the Town Administrator or the Chairperson in advance of the meeting that you intend to address the Board during citizen participation (although not required).
    To Address the Board during the Citizen Participation portion of the agenda :
    A group or large gathering should identify a spokesperson and the spokesperson’s remarks will serve the entire group to reduce the risk of repeating statements made by prior speakers. The Board is under time constraints so it is important to be concise. Any speaker must request permission to speak through the Chairperson. Any person wishing to address the Board should signify by raising a hand and being recognized by the Chairperson.
    When you are called upon to speak, you are requested to:
    a. Clearly state your name and address for the record.
    b. State your issue/concern. If appropriate, present the Board with any written statement or petition you wish to submit.
    c. All comments must be addressed to the Chairperson.
    d. In the event a person desiring to speak is not able to, that person should contact the Town Administrator following the meeting in an effort to arrange an appointment at a future meeting.
    Items on the agenda that are NOT advertised as a Public Hearing
    a. Public comment on an agenda item may be granted at the discretion of the Chairperson. The Chairperson is also given the discretion to allow/disallowadditional comments as it is not a Public Hearing.
    b. Persons wishing to address the board on an agenda item should wait until the topic has been concluded by the presenters and signify by raising a hand and being recognized by the Chairperson.
    c. All inquiries and statements by the public and/or press should be made through the Chairman after being recognized. When granted, limit comments to items directly on the agenda.
    d. The person must state for the record his or her name and street address and relationship to an agenda item and not use care not to repeat statements made by prior speakers.
    e. The Chairperson will decide as it related to questions of relevance.
    Items on the agenda identified and publicized as a Public Hearing
    a. Persons wishing to address the board on an item which appears during a public hearing shall wait until the comment period is opened for discussion by the Chairperson.
    b. Any person wishing to address the Board should signify by raising a hand and being recognized by the Chairman. All inquiries and statements by the public and/or press shall be made through the Chairman after being recognized.
    c. Public comment on a public hearing agenda item is encouraged and should be limited to no more than a few minutes per speaker. The Chairperson is granted the discretion to allow an extension of time if deemed necessary.
    d. The public is encouraged to limit their comments to items directly relating to the actual Public Hearing agenda item, and not to repeat statements made by prior speakers.
    e. Once the public hearing has been closed, public comment will end for that agenda item and the Board will begin its deliberation.
    Disorderly Conduct:
    Conduct that is deemed disorderly by the Chairperson will not be tolerated. If necessary the Chair has the discretion to remove individuals from the meeting who acts in a disorderly fashion. The Chairperson will not allow comments of a personal or derogatory nature, as they relate to previous speakers, Board or employees of the Town.
    Copyright © 2013 Keep Milford Casino-Free, All rights reserved.
    You are receiving this email because you signed up on our website casinofreemilford.com or because you signed the petition to Keep Milford Casino-Free.
    Our mailing address is:
    Keep Milford Casino-Free
    Main St
    Milford, MA 01757

    Thursday, February 28, 2013

    Man Punches Sands Slot Machine



    Man Punches Sands Slot Machine, Police Say
    Brooklyn man charged with criminal mischief after he allegedly caused $1,625 in damage to slot machine screen, court papers say.

    A New York City man was jailed early Wednesday after police said he smashed the screen on a slot machine at the Sands Casino Resort Bethlehem.

    Juan Delgado, 56, of Brooklyn, is charged with criminal mischief, disorderly conduct and public drunkenness.

    According to court records, police were called to the casino around 1:11 a.m. Wednesday after security reported that a man had punched the screen on one of the slot machines, causing "significant damage."

    Security had detained Delgado, who smelled of alcohol and admitted to a state trooper he had punched the machine, police said. Damage was estimated at $1,625.

    Delgado's bail was considerably higher, set at $10,000 by on-call District Judge Richard Yetter in Wilson. Delgado was unable to pay, and was sent to Northmapton County Prison.

    http://bethlehem.patch.com/articles/nyc-man-punched-sands-slot-machine-police-say

    Friday, February 1, 2013

    ABCC: Casinos shouldn’t prompt ‘happy hour’ rule changes



    ABCC: Casinos shouldn’t prompt ‘happy hour’ rule changes
    January 31, 2013
     
    Donna Goodison / Boston Herald
     
    Don’t expect any free or two-for-one drink specials at your local pub when casinos are finally built in Massachusetts.

    The Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission is recommending the state maintain its 29-year-old “happy hour” regulations and prohibitions.

    Its report follows five public hearings last year to solicit feedback from citizens, liquor license holders, public safety officials and others, the “overwhelming consensus” of which was that changing the existing regulation would substantially compromise public safety and foster a poor business climate, according to the ABCC.

    “Public safety was a key factor in conducting this review, and the overwhelming sentiment is that scaling back the ‘happy hour’ regulation would compromise the lives and well-being of the residents of the Commonwealth,” state Treasurer Steve  Treasurer [sic], who oversees the ABCC, said in a statement. “The regulation is supported by bar and tavern owners, the law enforcement community, and public safety officials, who all believe that it has played a substantial part in preventing unthinkable tragedies.”



    Under the state’s casino bill, the ABCC was charged with studying whether the happy hour law should be updated to level the playing field for liquor-serving establishments since gambling resorts will be able to offer free alcohol to their customers.

    [Not all states permit FREE ALCOHOL to be served in Gambling facilities.]

    Adopted in 1984 in part to prevent intoxicated people from being over-served and driving under the influence, the state’s happy hour law prohibits bars and restaurants from serving free, discounted or two-for-one alcoholic drinks.

    The Massachusetts Restaurant Association and prominent restaurant and bar owners spoke out in opposition to easing the current regulations.

    But the Restaurant and Business Alliance — a new trade group started by Phantom Gourmet CEO David Andelman — pushed for “flexibility” in the regulations, which require bars and restaurants offering drinks specials to keep the lower prices in place for a full calendar week.

    “The (ABCC) conducted extensive research and sought comment from the hospitality industry throughout the commonwealth,” ABCC chairman Kim Gainsboro said in a statement. “Each hearing showcased the dedication and commitment to community on the part of small business owners and, after reviewing comments pertaining to economic fairness and public safety, we feel that we have provided the governor, treasurer and the Legislature with a complete and accurate report.”


    Mass. alcohol regulators say happy hours should remain banned


    02/01/2013



    Repealing the state’s happy hour ban would be economically and socially detrimental to the Commonwealth and would not substantially protect restaurants from losing business to casinos, according to a report by state alcohol regulators.

    Some lawmakers had floated the idea of rolling back the happy hour restriction as a concession to liquor license holders, who have opposed a provision in the 2011 Gaming Act that allows casinos to serve free alcoholic drinks in their gaming areas.

    But the report, issued Thursday by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission, found that many restaurant owners feared the changes would create a “race to the bottom,” in which establishments would try to undercut each other’s prices to the extent that their business models would no longer be viable.

    “It was kind of this false premise that if you allowed restaurants to have happy hours it would level the playing field [with casinos],” Massachusetts Restaurant Association President Stephen Clark said.

    “But restaurants can’t subsidize free drinks like casinos.”

    The ABCC has banned businesses with liquor licenses from offering lower-priced drinks during happy hours since 1984, after a woman in Braintree was killed by a drunk driver who had consumed seven beers at a happy hour event.

    Treasurer Steven Grossman, whose office oversees the ABCC, said the happy hour ban is an important factor in upholding the state’s reputation and protecting its citizens.

    “I think it has served us well, and I think it is a very important public safety issue,” he said. “I am fully supportive of [the report’s] conclusions.”

    Offering free drinks is a common practice among gambling establishments [not all states permit FREE ALCOHOL], which make most of their profits from the games they run and can therefore afford to offer drinks and other services as perks for customers. [COMPS]

    The Gaming Act provision specifies that free alcoholic beverages can only be served on a casinos’ gaming floors, and not in restaurants or hotels that may be attached to the casinos.

    “ABCC still has oversight at casinos,” Grossman said. “Casinos still have to serve in a responsible way.”

    Restaurant owners know that any time a new source of entertainment enters the area they must find ways to make up for the business they will inevitably lose, Clark said.

    “From the very beginning we wanted casinos to play by the same rules as restaurants,” he said. “But happy hours would create a race to the bottom and would actually hurt the industry.”

    http://www.boston.com/metrodesk/2013/02/01/mass-alcohol-regulators-say-happy-hours-should-remain-banned/SSKktmznhrKSpFoudQwntM/story.html

     

    Saturday, December 1, 2012

    Drunks!


    Massachusetts is unable to adequately patrol our roads to prevent accidents caused by drunken drivers.

    Free Alcohol offered by Gambling Facilities will increase the carnage.



    Accident in Norton caused by drunk driver, police say
    GateHouse News Service
    Posted Dec 01, 2012
     
    A 25-year-old Attleboro man was driving drunk when he caused an accident at the intersection of West Main and South Worcester streets in Norton Friday night, police said.

    Eric Jette was driving a Jeep Wrangler at about 10:35 p.m. when it crossed over into the oncoming lane, police said. The driver of a Chevrolet Impala had to cross into the opposite lane in an attempt to avoid a head-on collision, police said, and the Jeep hit it.

    No one was injured in the crash. Jette was charged with drunken driving, negligent driving and a marked lanes violation.


    Read more: http://www.enterprisenews.com/topstories/x459327276/Accident-in-Norton-caused-by-drunk-driver-police-say#ixzz2DoTjakB0
     
     
    Drunken driving charge following Carver accident
    GateHouse News Service
    Posted Dec 01, 2012
     
    A Carver man began the weekend in a jail cell after being involved in a single-car accident at the intersection of Montello and North Main streets Saturday morning.

    Police said Mark Sirois, 24, was driving a Buick LeSabre that struck a sign, a guy wire and a utility pole at about 12:40 a.m. He was charged with drunken driving, driving with a suspended license and driving to endanger. He was taken to jail and is scheduled to be arraigned in Wareham District Court on Monday morning.


    Read more: http://www.patriotledger.com/topstories/x459327274/Drunken-driving-charge-following-Carver-accident#ixzz2DoU3sf87

    Brewster man charged with OUI
    BREWSTER — A Brewster man was arrested Saturday night for allegedly damaging several mailboxes and a tree while driving drunk.
     
    Duane Ryan, 52, of Yankee Drive, was charged with operating under the influence-second offense, operating to endanger, leaving the scene of a property damage accident, having an open container of alcohol, failure to stay in marked lane and possession of less than an ounce of marijuana, according to information from Brewster police.
     
    Ryan was injured in the accident and taken to Cape Cod Hospital, where he was treated and released. He was to be arraigned in Orleans District Court today.
     
    At about 8:30 p.m., police said, they received a report that Ryan had struck several mailboxes and a tree on Satucket Road. After leaving the scene, police said, he lost control again near the intersection of Satucket and Rocky Hill Road, where his car became stuck.
     

    Wednesday, September 5, 2012

    The Road to Hell



    The carnage on these roads was ignored until the Taunton/Genting proposal.

    How many millions will it cost Massachusetts taxpayers to subsidize wealthy
    Malaysian casino investors?

    Drivers refuse to slow down on Route 24

    Holiday weekend nets 10 drunken drivers on Route 24, Interstate 195

    By Justin Graeber
    Posted Sep 05, 2012


    ent route 24 7-16.jpg



    The state police have been stepping up weekend patrols on Route 24, but drunk drivers and speeders don’t seem to be getting the message.

    In the sixth week of the “patrol surge” on Route 24 and Interstate 195, state troopers said they made 10 arrests for drunk driving, 14 arrests for other charges, issued six criminal citations and 263 non-criminal citations.

    One of the arrestees, Aengus Dlouhy, 44, of Dartmouth was charged with his sixth drunk driving offense. Dlouhy was arrested on Interstate 195 on Friday night. Two of the drunk driving arrests happened on Route 24.

    This raises the total of drunk driving arrests to 55 since the surge began in early August. Of the 55 arrests, other than Dlouhy’s, 44 were for first offense, seven were for second offense, two were for third offense and one was for fourth offense.

    Speed was also a factor in many of the citations. This weekend, three operators stopped for speeding were clocked at speeds of 104, 107, and 110 mph.

    The surge deploys 11 additional patrols on Route 24 and Interstate 195 from 8 p.m. Friday to 4 a.m. Saturday and again from 8 p.m. Saturday to 4 a.m. Sunday.

    In addition to the drunk drivers, the six-week totals for the increased patrols include:
    56 other arrests,

    42 criminal summons issued,

    1,640 citations written for various motor vehicle violations.

    The extra patrols will run through September.


    Read more: http://www.enterprisenews.com/answerbook/brockton/x326766484/Holiday-weekend-nets-10-drunk-drivers-on-Route-24#ixzz25bNC9kju

    DEADLY BY DESIGN: Tight curves, short ramps, high speeds make Route 24 a dangerous highway to drive
    By Erik Potter
    Posted May 30, 2010

    From 2006 to 2008, nearly 2,400 people crashed their cars, trucks and motorcycles on the 25-mile stretch of Route 24 that runs between Randolph and Berkley.
    Eight of those people died.

    Read more: http://www.enterprisenews.com/news/cops_and_courts/x1015942137/DEADLY-BY-DESIGN-Tight-curves-short-ramps-high-speeds-make-Route-24-a-dangerous-highway-to-drive#ixzz25bPGEUsN

    Wednesday, August 29, 2012

    DRUNKS!



    We're mighty appreciative that DRUNKS are finally being removed from our roads, at least temporarily. 

    What does that say?

    Because of a federal grant, roads are finally being adequately patrolled?

    This after Beacon Hill ratified FREE ALCOHOL that will fill our roads with DRUNK GAMBLERS ???





    Are there any establishments that will have their licenses suspended for turning DRUNKS onto the streets, making each of us an innocent target ???



    Massachusetts Drunk Driving Deaths


    From: http://www.statewideinterlock.com/massachusetts_law_and_regulations.htm


    13 arrested at Abington drunk driving checkpoint
    By Erin Shannon
    Posted Aug 28, 2012


    A sobriety checkpoint on Route 18 yielded 13 arrests Friday night.

    The 13 arrests were made by the combined efforts of the Abington police and the state police, according to Abington Police Chief David Majenski.

    The checkpoint was part of the “Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over” mobilization by the state Executive Office of Public Safety and Security, according to a press release by Abington police.

    During the checkpoint at Cape Cod Lumber on Washington Street every vehicle was greeted briefly by an officer, said the release, which was posted on the Abington Police Department’s official Twitter account.

    Among the eight drivers arrested by the Abington police were seven first-time offenders and one second time offender.

    The Abington Police Department joined 128 other law enforcement agencies statewide in support of an intensive crackdown on impaired driving which will continue until Sept. 3 as part of the national Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over mobilization, funded by a federal grant administered through the EOPSS.

    Abington police were also one of 24 departments in the state to receive a Silver Award of Excellence from the EOPSS on Friday as part of the 2012 Massachusetts Law Enforcement Challenge.


    Read more: http://www.enterprisenews.com/topstories/x1718135457/13-arrested-at-Abington-drunk-driving-checkpoint#ixzz24qS9Gz8d

    Wednesday, August 22, 2012

    How many more drunks?




    State debating new casino booze rules

    By Dave Wedge
    Tuesday, August 21, 2012
    State liquor officials are still mulling just how free the booze should flow at the state’s new casinos, as well as whether restaurants and gin mills should have more freedom to slash prices and run specials to compete with the gleaming gaming palaces.

    “They have to give restaurateurs a little more flexibility,” said state Sen. Robert Hedlund, a Weymouth Republican and restaurant owner. “We know the casinos are getting special privileges.

    I’m not suggesting we should match the casinos. But we should take a look at the regulations and see what we can do.”

    It’s expected the new Bay State gaming parlors will be allowed to give free booze to gamblers, similar to most casinos, but the state Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission have yet to finalize rules. A public hearing is being held today on Beacon Hill, where restaurateurs, lawmakers and residents are expected to give their two cents on just how relaxed the alcohol laws should be at the casinos.

    LOOKING FOR FLEXIBILITY: State Sen....
    Photo by Patrick Whittemore
    LOOKING FOR FLEXIBILITY: State Sen. Robert Hedlund, who owns a restaurant, wants more freedom when it comes to rules on booze.
    The hearing is also being held to review existing booze rules to help the ABCC decide whether to roll back restrictions on “happy hour” and other laws barring drink specials at existing establishments.
    “The ABCC went into this with an open mind to see if the changes in the environment — the casinos, slots parlors — would dictate any changes in the happy hour legislation,” said State Treasurer Steven Grossman, who heads the ABCC and planned to attend the hearing. “It’s a listening opportunity.”

    Another hearing will be held next month in Northampton, while the ABCC is slated to submit a report to the Legislature, Gov. Deval Patrick and Grossman by Jan. 30. The Gaming Commission and the ABCC will jointly create the booze rules for the casinos while the Gaming Commission will issue alcohol licenses, officials said.

    Hedlund doesn’t support a return to “happy hour,” but fears free drinks at casinos will siphon away business from nearby restaurants and pubs.

    “The laws are archaic,” he said, noting that many establishments regularly violate laws against daily drink specials. “They need to be reviewed.”

    Strega owner Nick Varano thinks the casinos will attract more tourists and be “great for the city” but is hoping liquor officials will offer some “flexibility” with restaurant and bar owners to “level the playing field.”  [There is no indication that Mr. Varano has conducted any reason research before making this fanciful statement. Studies have determined Casinos destroy tourism. Never let the facts determine a decision! ]



    “I won’t mind if my competition gets certain privileges if I get some. too,” Varano said. “I look at this as a positive.”

    Monday, August 13, 2012

    ‘Happy Hour’ debate brewing - 8 DRUNKS Arrested

    Below is the update of recent increased State Police Patrols on Route 24 and I-195.
    The state is NOT paying for adequate patrolling at any other time, making each of us an innocent target of DRUNKS.


    Beacon Hill lacked the spine to simply say NO! to the Gambling Industry and created this disaster.

    How much carnage is enough?
    Governor Slot Barns Patrick refused to take a stand.

    Failed roadways. Inadequate patrolling. Inadequate funding. Failure to prosecute and revoke liquor licenses. That's today.
    Freetown, 1-08-12


    Avon, 7-14-12
    A car rests on its side near the Route 139 exit on the northbound side of Route 24 after a rollover accident in which a 12-year-old girl was killed on Thursday.
    Read more: http://www.enterprisenews.com/breaking/x1975584870/Multiple-people-ejected-in-rush-hour-crash-on-Rt-24#ixzz23RtjmKUD

    7-15-12, State police have confirmed that two people have died in a three car crash in West Bridgewater, Massachusetts.


    4-25-11, Fall River Rollover Crash Kills One



    1 killed in crash on Rt 24 in Freetown Two others injured in single-car crash near Exit 9


    ‘Happy Hour’ debate brewing

    Restaurants air concerns over casinos’ free drinks

    By Donna Goodison
    Monday, August 13, 2012
    The state is weighing whether Massachusetts’ 28-year-old “happy hour law” — which bans bars and restaurants pouring free, discounted or two-for-one alcoholic beverages — should be updated so they can better compete when casinos open here with the ability to serve free booze.

    While restaurant trade groups and some liquor license holders support more flexibility in offering discounts, most contacted by the Herald don’t want a return to the days of drink specials of the late ’70s and early ’80s. Others, including Mothers Against Drunk Driving, say they’re content with the current law.

    “Do I want to go back to the days of two-for-ones and happy hour? No, not really, but in terms of competitive advantage, that should be up to the individual operators’ discretion,” said John Grasso, president of the Halfway Cafe chain of six restaurants. “Our industry is under siege, and (free drinks at casinos) is just another nail in the coffin. There is an unfair playing advantage with that.”

    The Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission will hold a hearing in Boston on Aug. 21 — one of five across the state — to solicit public feedback. The casino bill passed last year requires the ABCC to complete a study by Jan. 31 of whether the happy hour law should be updated or amended.

    The ABCC declined comment other than to say its evaluation is a “comprehensive and open process,” and all public comments will be considered.

    The happy hour law was enacted in part to prevent intoxicated people from being over-served and driving under the influence.

    “At the time, that was something that MADD really fought for,” spokesman David DeIuliis said.
    The Massachusetts Restaurant Association last year opposed a provision in the Senate version of the casino bill, later removed, that would have granted parity to restaurants and bars, giving them the ability to offer the same alcohol service — i.e., free drinks — as those granted to casinos.

    “Proponents for the happy hour are saying that if they were able to do two-for-ones and things like that, they would be able to better compete with the casinos, and we disagree,” said Peter Christie, CEO of the restaurant group. “If you think you can compete with a casino on price, you’re making a huge mistake. You can’t compete with free.”

    On the other hand, the Restaurant and Business Alliance supports relaxing a current requirement that forces establishments offering discounted drinks to keep that low price — which must cover their cost — for a full week. President David Andelman said two-day specials could spark sales on slow days.

    “This would give restaurants the flexibility, for instance, to do $3 drafts Monday and Tuesday nights, or $5 glasses of wine,” said Andelman, who’s also CEO of Phantom Gourmet. “This would be an excellent way to help level the playing field and to help generate more income taxes and more meals taxes without jeopardizing public safety.”

    But restaurateur Jeff Gates says casinos’ bigger threat is their ability to drive up payroll costs for already hard-to-find hospitality workers.

    “I don’t feel there should be an arms race in alcohol, driving prices down to the lowest level,” said Gates, a partner in the Aquitaine Group, which owns six restaurants “I don’t think that’s going to be healthy for anybody.”

    http://bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1061152701



    State police patrols nab 8 more drunken drivers
    By Erin Shannon
    Posted Aug 14, 2012



    State police nabbed eight drunken drivers and two drug traffickers this weekend – the third week of its “patrol surge” on Route 24 and I-195.

    Troopers also issued seven criminal summonses and 272 motor vehicle citations.

    State police announced on July 26 they were nearly tripling patrols on Route 24 and I-195 on Friday and Saturday nights through September, after recent fatal crashes on Route 24.

    The Routes 24/195 “patrol surge” deploys 11 additional patrols from 8 p.m. Friday night to 4 a.m. Saturday morning and again from 8 p.m. Saturday to 4 a.m. Sunday.

    The eight arrested drunken drivers included Edward Cerruti, 44, of East Weymouth, stopped on Route 24 northbound in Berkley and charged with operating under the influence of alcohol, third offense, as well as James Delaney, 24, of Raynham, Bruce W. Baker, 45, of Middleboro, David Gajewski, 43, of New Bedford, Benjamin A. Vandal, 28, of New Bedford, Erin Carrig, 27, of Portsmouth, R.I., Andrew D. Baum, 28, of Warren and Majed M. Alrahmawi, 41, of Plymouth.

    Troopers also stopped a Camry being driven 90 mph in a 55 mph zone and found 530 bags of heroin and a bag of unpackaged heroin. Keith M. Boucher, 36, of Wareham, and Jonathan B. Rose, 20, of Bourne were each was charged with trafficking in heroin and conspiracy to violate drug laws.
    State police will continue the extra patrols through the end of September.

    Read more: http://www.enterprisenews.com/topstories/x181548676/State-Police-nabbed-8-drunk-drivers-2-drug-traffickers-during-weekend-patrol-surge#ixzz23WVlsfTR


    Saturday, August 11, 2012

    Mandel: Gambling on the courts




    Mandel: Gambling on the courts



    michele-mandel
    By ,Toronto Sun
    First posted:

    slot


    Ontario compulsive gamblers are getting one more shot at rolling the dice for the big jackpot they could never win on their own.
    The province’s highest court has decided to allow problem gamblers led by Peter Dennis to appeal two lower court decisions that refused to certify their $3.5-billion class-action lawsuit against the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Commission.
    “We survived to fight another day,” says their lawyer, Jerome Morse.
    On behalf of more than 11,000 addicts, they allege the OLG allowed them to continue betting away millions between 1999 and 2005 even after they signed “self-exclusion” contracts asking to be barred from Ontario casinos for their own good.
    “We say that we identified ourselves as problem gamblers and we were in need of being kept out of your gambling venues and yet you did virtually nothing,” their lawyer explains. “You took photos that went into books that gathered dust. How do you keep track of 11,000 self-excluded gamblers when you have millions coming in? No one can argue these were your best efforts.”
    Since 2011, the OLG now has facial recognition software at each site to scan the face of everyone who enters against a database of more than 16,500 problem gamblers who have voluntarily banned themselves. But this lawsuit predates that era when there was no central database and staff were somehow expected to memorize thousands of pictures and spot self-excluders.
    At the heart of the proposed class action is Dennis, 52, who lost his job, his house and nearly his family. According to his statement of claim, the Markham account manager became addicted to playing the slots at Woodbine Racetrack and gambled away $350,000 between 2000 and 2004. After an 11-week binge, the depressed and anxious father of two admitted he had a problem and signed a self-exclusion contract believing it would keep him away from his addiction.
    But Dennis claims he was stopped only once in the following three years.
    He would go on to blow through another $200,000 and in April 2005, the bank foreclosed on his home. He was fired that year from a data management firm because he owed money to a client and in September 2007, gambling cost him his second home. He was bankrupt and his family so fractured that one child tried to commit suicide and the other fell far behind in school.
    But who’s to blame — the addict or the pusher?
    The proposed class action will argue that the OLG owes a duty of care to compulsive gamblers — like a bar that has to stop serving a patron who’s had too much to drink, the gaming venue had a responsibility to step in and actually enforce the self-exclusion contract.
    Should the OLG be expected to be their babysitter? “The self-exclusion program is not a policing program,” argues spokesman Rui Brum. “The onus is on the self-excluder to keep themselves out of OLG sites.”
    So far, Dennis and his bid for a class action lawsuit has crapped out twice.
    In 2010, Ontario Superior Court Justice Maurice Cullity ruled their case was more suited to individual lawsuits and refused to certify it as a class action. To that point, nine individual lawsuits against the OLG had been settled with an average pay out of $167,000 and another four lawsuits were pending.
    Last year, the Divisional Court reached the same conclusion and wouldn’t allow a class action to go ahead, although one of the three judges disagreed.
    Now this decision by the Ontario Court of Appeal Thursday will allow them one last chance to argue their case for certification. While the court gave no reasons as to why they will hear the appeal, the gamblers’ lawyer believes that it certainly satisfies the requirement that it be of wider public interest, especially now with OLG’s-plan to increase provincial gambling revenues by a staggering 75%. “The need for responsible gaming and self-exclusion will be very important,” he warns.
    As for Dennis, he’s working again and piecing his life back together. He’s sworn off gambling save for one last bet — that he can bring his class-action lawsuit to trial and hold the province responsible for his downfall.

    http://www.torontosun.com/2012/08/09/mandel-gambling-on-the-courts




    Friday, July 27, 2012

    Welcomed into Massachusetts!




    Massachusetts ‘GAMING’ Future

    The Associated Press - Fri, Jul. 27, 2012 - $75M lawsuit claims casino let man drink to death

    JACKSON, Miss. - A lawsuit claims a Mississippi casino served so much alcohol to a man taking powerful prescription painkillers that he died on the floor of his hotel bathroom.

    The lawsuit against IP Casino Resort and Spa in Biloxi was filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Gulfport. It seeks damages of $75 million.

    The suit claims casino workers kept serving free drinks to 30-year-old Bryan Lee Glenn in August 2009, ignoring pleas from the drunken man's family to stop serving him.


    Read more:


    JACKSON, Miss. - A lawsuit claims a Mississippi casino served so much alcohol to a man taking powerful prescription painkillers that he died on the floor of his hotel bathroom.

    The lawsuit against IP Casino Resort and Spa in Biloxi was filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Gulfport. It seeks damages of $75 million.

    The suit claims casino workers kept serving free drinks to 30-year-old Bryan Lee Glenn in August 2009, ignoring pleas from the drunken man's family to stop serving him.

    The suit says Glenn died in his hotel room. He'd taken prescribed painkillers including Percocet, morphine and Xanax, as well as antipsychotic medications in the three weeks before his death, the lawsuit says. He was being treated for physical injuries as well as psychosis and hallucinations. Glenn had suffered a traumatic brain injury in a 2004 four-wheeler accident, then suffered back injuries in a 2007 car wreck.

    Casino spokeswoman Lynn Frisby said the company doesn't comment on pending litigation.
    The lawsuit represents only one side of the legal argument. The casino hasn't responded in court filings.

    Glenn and his mother and brother lived in coastal Long Beach, Miss., but lost everything to Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and eventually settled in Virginia. They returned to Mississippi with a friend in August 2009 to pick up Glenn's check from a settlement from a previous lawsuit and to look for a place to live. They were staying at the IP resort.

    Glenn picked up the $15,000 check on the morning of Aug. 6, 2009, and the group planned to use some of the money on a deposit for place to live. But once back at the resort, Glenn began betting up to $1,000 a hand on blackjack and ordering two drinks at a time , whiskey and cola and shots of tequila. The suit says a dealer, pit boss, waitress and security guard were among those who refused to intervene after Glenn was falling down drunk and his family begged the casino to stop serving him.

    "He's old enough to make his own decisions," the lawsuit claims a pit boss said to Glenn's brother.

    The lawsuit says Glenn had attempted suicide days before his death, was highly intoxicated and became agitated when his family tried to get him to leave the casino. When his friend and relatives finally convinced Glenn to leave, the lawsuit says, a dealer told him he still had chips and said,

    "`Aren't you going to come back and play?'"

    He went back to gamble more and met a prostitute, whom he paid for services to be rendered later.

    When the casino stopped serving Glenn he began to leave with the prostitute, who reached in his pocket and took money. Glenn's mother argued with the prostitute, then went to a security guard, who made the woman give the money back, according to the lawsuit.

    Glenn then went to a casino bar, called the Chill Lounge, and began drinking Long Island iced teas, a drink made with five liquors. His relatives say they asked the bartender to stop serving Glenn, but the relatives then had to leave to take another family member home. Glenn was not in the lounge when they returned. A doorman told his relatives he had been escorted out of the casino by security, the lawsuit says.

    Glenn's brother, mother and friend found him in his hotel room, "on the floor and half in the bathtub, facing the toilet with his pants around his ankles," the family's lawyer wrote in the lawsuit.

    Glenn's friend, trained as an emergency medical technician, tried for 25 minutes to revive Glenn until a casino medic arrived, according to the lawsuit. The medic told Glenn's friend to continue CPR because the medic didn't have a "mouthpiece." An ambulance crew arrived 20 minutes later, but
    Glenn died on the scene, the lawsuit says.

    "Despite their best efforts to save him from harm, Bryan was slowly poisoned while his friend and family ... helplessly watched," the family's attorney, Michael Holleman, wrote in the lawsuit.

    http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/nation/20120727_ap_75mlawsuitclaimscasinoletmandrinktodeath.html#ixzz21rdxCerQ

    Saturday, July 14, 2012

    Twin River


    Cop kicks handcuffed woman in the head





    Police Brutality: Lincoln officer avoids prison for kicking woman!






     A Lincoln police officer was spared prison time on Monday for kicking a handcuffed woman in the head outside a slot parlor in 2009, an encounter that was caught on surveillance video and shown at his trial.

    Officer Edward Krawetz, 47, was given a 10-year suspended sentence with probation. He was found guilty in January of felony battery with a dangerous weapon for kicking Donna Levesque, of Uxbridge, Mass. The incident occurred as Levesque sat on a curb outside Twin River waiting for a patrol car to pick her up for booking on a disorderly conduct charge on May 31, 2009.

    Thursday, May 17, 2012

    Rob Rose Embraces Name Calling!

    Although it took several years to awaken slumbering voters in Middleboro, the Predatory Gambling issues shuffled and awakened many to transform town government, educate voters about the basics such as the Open Meeting Law, address and correct numerous issues that were merely added to the "Old Business" list as a mortuary, to be carried forward in Memoriam.




    Pickles? Yes!

    An inept Board with one member who seems still not to 'Get it,' transformed into an effective Board partnering with an effective and efficient Town Manager moving the Town forward professionally based on facts and laws and research.

    And then I traveled to Plainville and experienced a Town not yet experiencing a similar epiphany, still governed by a Board mired in apathy and misinformation - the same old 'we've done it this way for 100 years....' in an Internet age, behaving like BobbleHeads willingly led.  





    It's like watching cucumbers get pickled in brine.



    And along comes Rob Rose denigrating Slot Barn Opponents because he's consumed too much KoolAid to conduct his due diligence.




    The Plainville Board of Selectmen have betrayed residents by seeking advice from a man who discards his avocation, denies the increased crime attached to Slot Barns (by whatever elegant name) and refuses to document or qualify his statements, refuses to provide FACTS - those dastardly little things!

    Although a Palmer citizens' group easily determined the annual increased costs to the Town would be $18 million to $39 million, Plainville Selectmen seem frazzled to address those costs and impacts.

    The Plainville Selectmen and Town Manager were invited to an educational forum that revealed and quantified those issues, yet they preferred ignorance instead, carefully avoiding the forum.

    For Rob Rose to denigrate and demean opponents instead reveals his choice to blindly follow and refuse to enlighten himself, endorsing the community destruction accompanying Predatory Gambling.
     
    What community is better off 5 years after a Slot Barn has opened in its midst? Not one!
     
    Oh! And Mr. Rose, you might consider taking a lesson from Adam Bond who was masterful at dividing a community by calling opponents "Braying Donkeys," comparing opponents to terrorists, Nazis and accusing of racism. What was accomplished?  
     
    You might try conducting your due diligence for the benefit of your community and consider the consequences of your petty comments. In the end, Mr. Bond will lose this election, just as he lost the 2 judgeships for which he submitted his name. Yes, the community is polite to him even as they work for his defeat.

    Leadership is about uniting not about name-callling.


    Final say on racino plan belongs to Plainville voters

    To the editor: I feel compelled to reply to Mary Ann Greanier's letter "Plainville should Foxboro lead on gambling" (May 13). Her plea/message was essentially: 1) Foxboro took the right course by denying the Kraft /Wynn casino, 2) slots are bad, 3) the Plainville Board of Selectmen are predisposed to approve a racino and 4) the only way to stop the racino is to pressure the selectmen not to negotiate with Plainridge.

    The gambling law has a course of action that towns take when a developer wants to build a casino/racino. In Plainville's case, the selectmen would negotiate an agreement with the developer. After that has been concluded, a town election would be held to approve or disapprove the terms of the agreement. There would be public hearings to discuss the details, the financial and social impacts, and the mitigation. The intent is to have all the angles covered. Ms. Greanier and her anti-gambling "illuminati" do not want that process to move forward. They don't want a discussion of the pros and cons. They don't want residents to participate and make the decision. They believe they know better, that residents are not enlightened enough to make the "right call." If the selectmen elect not to negotiate with Plainridge, the racino is dead.

    This decision will affect Plainville far into the future and is so important that it cannot be left in the hands of the selectmen or Mary-Ann Greanier and the anti-racino group.

    As a selectman, I feel it is my duty to make sure the town makes the very best deal with Plainridge. Once it goes to the election, it's for the town voters, to decide whether it's in Plainville's best interests. The decision cannot be restricted to a small group of people.

    I expect that for the next few months, the "illuminati," which includes many non-Plainville residents, will be in attendance at selectmen's meetings, attempting to intimidate us. As Ms. Greanier recently said, "We need to put the pressure on." I will not bend!

    Rob Rose, Plainville
    THE WRITER is a Plainville selectman.

    The information is out there --

    Interest in Horse Racing is declining nationwide, yet the Industry insists on taxpayer subsidies to preserve the failing business.

    Even Churchill Downs, home of the Kentucky Derby is financially struggling, cutting racing dates.

    This is like seeking to preserve 8-track tapes and ignoring the consequences.

    Slot Machines have been called the "Crack Cocaine of Gambling" because they are designed to addict, frequently offering small wins or 'near misses' to entice continued playing.

    "Crime spiked.....In the vicinity near the racetrack, overall criminal offences rose from 994 in 1999 to 1,267 the next year — a 27.46 per cent increase, according to a 2001 police report. Broken down, violent crime jumped 28.57 per cent and property crime 15.98 per cent. Just north, traffic offences under the criminal code, such as impaired driving, shot up 41.51 per cent."

    "In the years after the first casinos were built, Atlantic City went from having the 50th-highest per capita crime rate in the United States to being No. 1 on the list."
     
    Suffolk Downs keeps reduced racing days
    Of horse racing --
    the number of thoroughbred foals produced in the U.S. dropped 20 percent in the last decade.
    CT: Taxpayer Bailouts!
    ...don’t call it economic development.


    Footnote: Illuminati