Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label local business. Show all posts
Showing posts with label local business. Show all posts

Sunday, October 16, 2016

40 years later, was A.C.'s casino gamble worth it?





In this photo, gamblers sit at slot machines at the Golden Nugget casino in Atlantic City, N.J. A measure approved by a New Jersey Assembly ...

... staunchest opponents of the ballot question that would amend the state Constitution to permit casino gambling outside the seaside gambling resort.




New documents obtained by the Associated Press show groups that oppose and support the November 8th casino expansion question have spent ...

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. – Atlantic City casinos saw a revenue decline in September, led by a large drop in earnings at the now closed Trump Taj Mahal.


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION & VIDEO ON LINK

40 years later, was A.C.'s casino gamble worth it?


ATLANTIC CITY — Steven Perskie thinks about the legacy of legalizing gambling here each time he sees the city’s skyline.
It’s been nearly four decades since Perskie, dubbed “the father of casino gaming,” wrote the law that allowed casinos in the struggling seaside city.
“The question I keep asking myself is a version of: What would Atlantic City have looked like in the last 40 years?” Perskie, 71, said Thursday. “What would Atlantic City look like today? What would the area look like today if we hadn’t done it or if we hadn’t succeeded?”
With the 40th anniversary of the Nov. 2, 1976, passage of the gambling referendum approaching, he isn’t the only one asking such questions.
On Nov. 8, the state will ask voters to again approve gaming, this time in North Jersey. The vote will come in the wake of five casino closings, 10,000 lost jobs and a city repeatedly near default following the opening of casinos in nearby states.
For a great part of the past four decades, Atlantic City casinos created thousands of jobs, millions in tax revenue and billions in capital investments while making Atlantic City an East Coast gambling mecca. Tourism in the city increased five-fold in the first decade. Neighboring communities, such as Egg Harbor and Galloway townships, saw enormous growth as people flocked to the region for work.
But critics say casinos didn’t fulfill all the promises. The gambling halls put small establishments out of business by offering dining, shopping and entertainment all in one building. Gaming tax revenue helped pay for Atlantic City housing and development, but the city still suffers from blighted areas and vacant properties, some right along the Boardwalk.
“It delivered a tremendous amount of jobs, a tremendous amount of revenue. In a lot of ways, a tremendous amount of excitement,” said Bryant Simon, a historian and author of “Boardwalk of Dreams: Atlantic City and the Fate of Urban America.” “But I don’t think anybody in 1976 — that night on the Boardwalk it was bone-chillingly cold and people danced to celebrate — imagined what the city looks like now.”
For Perskie, a former state lawmaker and gaming regulator, gambling didn’t accomplish everything it could have. But he said the community wouldn’t have a “small fraction of the economic viability” it has had if the referendum hadn’t passed.
“The legacy is we put thousands of families in a much stronger economic position. We created a very viable industry,” Perskie said. “We created opportunities for people that wouldn’t have ever possibly been otherwise available.”
Indeed, the casinos offered good-paying jobs with benefits. Workers could afford to “buy a home, send away your kids to college and retire with dignity,” said Chuck Baker, a 57-year-old city resident, casino union member and former Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort cook.
But in recent years, as competition increased, casinos told workers they couldn’t afford the labor contracts, Baker said. He blamed “hedge-fund operators” who took money out of the properties and sent it “to New York.”
“That meant more money for the properties,” he said. “They didn’t want to take care of the workers.”
The Taj Mahal closed Monday amid a labor strike over issues including health benefits and breaks.
The Casino Association of New Jersey said the industry has “more than held up its end of the bargain” through the billions it generated in tax revenue and economic impact.
“Perhaps it took five casino closures and the unfortunate loss of some of those economic benefits for many to fully understand the significant economic impact generated by our industry for not only the city and the state, but the regional economy as well,” a statement from the association said. “Even with the right-sizing of our industry, Atlantic City remains one of the largest casino markets in the country and one of the most significant economic engines in the Garden State.”
At its height, the casino industry employed more than 50,000 people, including a quarter of Atlantic City’s population. Gaming-tax revenue for the state peaked at $502 million in 2006, and the city’s ratable base topped off at $20 billion in 2008.
But after five casino closings in three years, the gambling halls now employ about 21,000 workers, annual state gaming revenue hovers around $200 million and the city’s ratable base is down to $6.6 billion. Casinos opening in neighboring states, a consolidation of casino companies and the 2008 national recession have diminished the city’s gambling market.
Good-paying jobs and tax dollars weren’t the only promises of the casino referendum. The Casino Control Act of 1977 was intended to spark the city’s tourism industry and spur urban redevelopment.
But casinos alone reaped the benefits of the subsequent tourism boom, according to a recent report from New Jersey Policy Perspective, a left-leaning think tank. There were 242 food-and-drink establishments in the city before casinos arrived. By 1996, just 142 were left, according to the report.
Casinos have paid more than $4 billion in real estate taxes and funded $350 million in Atlantic City housing and development projects. But the NJPP report said the promise of the city’s urban renewal was largely ignored.
New Jersey created the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority in 1984 and offered casinos two options: spend 1.25 percent of gross revenue on CRDA-issued bonds for urban and economic development, or pay a 2.5 percent tax to the state.
“Casinos chose the first option. But over time, the redevelopment mission was diluted by the Legislature, allowing CRDA to spend money on tourism-related activities that directly benefited the casinos,” the report said.
Ironically, proponents of North Jersey casinos are promising hundreds of millions in gambling tax revenue to redevelop Atlantic City, nearly an identical argument for gambling advocates in 1976.
Perskie blamed “local political forces” for not doing “what had to be done to take maximum advantage of the situation.”
“For each success story there is a failure story, because there are areas of the city that did not receive from city or county or local government the kind of attention, the kind of imagination, the kind of daring thought processes that they were entitled to,” Perskie said. “And as a result, some areas of the city didn’t benefit as they should have.”
In 1977, Gov. Brendan Byrne signed the Casino Control Act in front of nearly 3,000 people outside Convention Hall, or what is now called Boardwalk Hall. A band played “Happy Days Are Here Again.”
But Byrne expressed uncertainty as he signed the law with gold pen after gold pen.
“I do know that this is an historic event,” he said. “But I don’t know if history will view what we have done here with success or failure.”
COMMENT: 
I think it's quite obvious and safe to say that casinos have been a complete disaster for AC! They put half the longtime local businesses out of business. Were responsible for the greed and speculation that has left 1/3 of AC a vacant wasteland. Crime rose astronomically. Practically all the beautiful buildings in AC have been demolished. Practically zero middle/upper class residents are left...half of AC's population was white when casinos came...now maybe 10% and they're old and being taxed out and AC's population is now practically all government dependent uneducated minorities. The school system is an overpriced failure. Massive, hulking empty casino towers line the Boardwalk while Atlantic County has the highest foreclosure rate and property taxes in the country. If I were Perskie, I'd be ashamed to speak about his role in this epic debacle!


Sunday, August 21, 2016

Connecticut's casino racket is over; now we hurt mostly ourselves



Connecticut's casino racket is over; now we hurt mostly ourselves


Posted: Thursday, August 18, 2016

With its Indian casinos in Ledyard and Montville in the southeast part of the state, Connecticut started the gambling war that is engulfing the Northeast. For years Connecticut drew money from gamblers in adjacent states that had no casinos, but those states are getting into the casino business themselves and starting to fight back,
Massachusetts may be most notable among them, especially with the casino it has authorized MGM to build in Springfield to draw customers from northern and central Connecticut, who will be able to get to Springfield a lot faster than they can get to Montville and Ledyard.
So Connecticut has authorized its tribes, the Mashantucket Pequots and the Mohegans, to build another casino between Hartford and the state line in the hope of intercepting casino traffic to Springfield. But the interceptor casino probably won't have much effect unless it is as big as Springfield's, and disclosure of a proposal for a big casino at Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks has made the neighbors nervous and angered MGM.
The situation raises two policy questions for Connecticut:
1) If casinos are going to be everywhere, who needs Indian tribes to provide them?
Connecticut's casino tribes have purchased their duopoly by splitting their slot machine revenue with state government. But that revenue has been declining steadily as casinos have sprouted in nearby states, and Ledyard and Montville are not strategically located. So state government probably would profit more by licensing and taxing new casinos, operated by anyone or even state government itself, at the several major traffic intake points on the state border -- not just north of Hartford but around Stamford, Danbury, and Stonington -- and ending the duopoly of the Indian casinos and forfeiting their slot revenue. This would eliminate the repugnant ethnic privilege on which the casino business in the state is now based.
2) When casinos are everywhere, who really benefits from them?
While the interceptor casino north of Hartford is purportedly meant to save jobs for Connecticut, such a result is not likely. Just as the MGM casino in Springfield will drain the restaurant and entertainment businesses for miles around, an interceptor casino, if it is big enough to compete with Springfield, will do the same in the Hartford area. An interceptor casino may particularly impair efforts to revive downtown Hartford, which already has been greatly weakened by the development of Blue Back Square in West Hartford, a town that, unlike Hartford, has a large middle class that can support all sorts of commerce. Further, as long as their number is strictly limited by government licensing, casinos only concentrate income and wealth, a result government tolerates because it gets a cut.
So it would be best if Connecticut realized that its casino racket is finished, that the days of casinos making more money from out-of-staters than in-staters are over, that the money state government earns from casinos comes too much from the poor, that casinos induce crime, but that if, because of government’s insatiability, we’re going to have them, everybody should be able to operate one.
* * *
-----
Chris Powell is managing editor of the Journal Inquirer.



Tuesday, June 9, 2015

2012 Recap: Getting snookered!




Today, Atlantic City is the poster child for all that is wrong with Casino Gambling. 

If you think you're different, think again. 




From 2012:

Jobs:
  • There will be short term increase in construction jobs 
  • In Illinois, there are more people on the self-exclusion list than are employed by the casinos.
  • Atlantic City's Unions are encouraging their employees to apply for food stamps. 
  • The Casino's drain money from the local economy and cost more jobs than they bring in. 
  • http://www.saynotocasinos.com/lies/businesses/  [link no longer valid] Steve Wynn, a casino owner once said, “Get it straight…there is no reason on earth for any of you to expect for more than one second that just because there are people here [at casinos], they’re going to run into your store, or restaurant, or bar.” Donald Trump, in an interview with the Miami Herald, said “People will spend a tremendous amount of money in casinos, money that they would normally spend on buying a refrigerator or a new car. Local businesses will suffer because they lose customer dollars to the casinos.”
Revenue:
  • Government sponsored gambling is a failed public policy that isn't working anywhere in the country.  
    • The state of West Virginia is buying new slot machines for their casinos so that they can better compete with surrounding states.
    • Florida has estimated that they will LOSE between $2 and $90 million to support their gambling operations.
    • NH did a study in 2009 on the estimated revenue a casino at Rockingham Park would bring, and they found that the costs would outpace revenue by $60 million.
  • The Governor's Secretary of Economic Development and front man on the casinos, during a meeting with opponents (us on 9/21/11) asserted that the revenue "would cover the costs associated with expanded gaming."  
  • Mohegan Sun is $1.6 billion in debt and their stock is rated at a junk-bond status.  
  • Casino states have higher unemployment and budget deficits than MA. Nevada leads in both those categories as well as suicides.
Crime:
  • Ledyard, CT (home to Foxwoods), has seen a 30-fold increase in calls to 911 since casinos were introduced.
  • CT State Police have seen a dramatic increase in drunken driving arrests, followed by a leveling off of drunken driving arrests.  The leveling off, was followed by an increase in drunken driving DEATHS.  The state police determined that drunken driving occurrences had continued to rise but they did not have enough police resources to CATCH them.


Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Former Congressman speaks against casinos




Former Congressman speaks against casinos




By Diane Church


With the Mohegan and Mashantucket Pequot tribes seeking to build casinos in north central Connecticut, a new part of the state may soon experience issues that are now familiar to those in the southeastern region.

Both tribes want to build new casinos along the Interstate 91 and 84 corridors north of Hartford to compete with the MGM Casino now under construction in Springfield, Mass.

Reactions have been mixed. Officials in Windsor, Suffield and Enfield have said they don't want casinos. East Hartford has said it would welcome a casino at the former Showcase Cinemas on Silver Lane, which sits alongside I-84 and has been abandoned for years. Meanwhile, Bradley International Airport has been suggested as a possible location.

Robert Steele, a business executive, former U.S. Congressman and son of radio legend Bob Steele, wants area residents to know about how casino gambling can quickly change a community. He spoke about the issue on April 28 at a Suffield Women's Club meeting at the Suffield Senior Center. Steele lived in southeastern Connecticut and watched the developments firsthand, he said, coming to the conclusion that the casinos deal their communities a losing hand on many fronts.

"It started in 1988 when Congress passed the Indian Gaming Act," Steele said. "This allowed federally recognized tribes to start casinos to support themselves."

The Mashantucket Pequots, who received federal recognition in 1983, were the first to open a casino in 1992. Then another tribe, the Mohegans, received recognition in 1994 and opened their casino two years later.

Prior to that, Steele said, the only states that allowed legalized slot machines and table games were Nevada and New Jersey. Gamblers, he said, were affluent folks who usually visited the casinos occasionally.

Now 40 states have a combined total of more than 1,000 casinos. With this competition, the stakes have been raised. Casinos now aim for a more diverse audience while still keeping up their glittery, high-class façade, Steele said. Some people are lured into gambling addiction, hooked on the thrill and the promise that the next game could yield a jackpot.

Steele said that it's a myth that casinos contribute to the local economy by bringing in more customers. He said a friend of his who had a restaurant in New London County thought the casinos would increase his business. Instead, they had the opposite effect and the restaurant closed after a couple of years.

Steele said people go to the casino, eat at the casino, stay overnight in the casino hotel, attend events at the casino and drive home after fueling up at the tribal-owned gas station.

Although casinos bring in jobs, Steele said they are usually low-skilled, low-paying jobs. To supplant their workforce, casinos bring in immigrants who crowd into houses, often living in substandard conditions, he said.

In recent years, the tribes have watched the recession and new gambling operations in the area take away their casino monopoly and the profits that went with it. New York opened nine racetrack casinos and eight Indian casinos and has four more casinos planned or proposed. Slots parlors have opened in Rhode Island. Now the latest competitor, the MGM Casino, is poised to take customers from the Boston area.

When the casinos opened, the tribes agreed to give 25 percent of their slot machine revenue to the state in exchange for a monopoly on slot machines. Now that the state is hooked on that money, officials have been nervously watching their cut dwindle along with casino profits. They are hoping, along with the tribes, to increase casino revenue, so the proposed new casinos are getting little opposition from them, Steele said.

Steele wrote a book, "The Curse," to inform people about what happens when a casino comes to town. The work of historical fiction chronicles a fictional family dealing with some of the very real problems the casinos caused in southeast Connecticut. It starts with fictional character Ethan Williams, fighting in the real Pequot War. His wife is killed in the war, but he settles in the area and starts a farm.

Fast forward some 350 years to the late 1980s, and one of Williams' descendants, Josh Williams, moves home and wants to save the family farm in the fictional town of Sheffield. The Mashantucket Pequots and the Mohegans soon built their casinos nearby, causing the problems Steele spoke about.

Then a third tribe, the "Northern Pequots," seek federal recognition so they can build a casino near the farm. This is fact-based. There actually was a tribe called the Eastern Pequots that tried unsuccessfully to get federal recognition in the 1990s so they could build a casino in the area.

Steele said he plans to speak in Windsor Locks, but nothing has been scheduled yet. His schedule of public appearances can be seen at http://www.rhsteele.com.

"If a casino comes to your town, you will not recognize your community," he said. "The pressure for more casinos is a daunting prospect for those of us who think we have enough."



http://www.courant.com/reminder-news/windsor-locks-edition/rnw-wl-suffield-steele-casinos-book-the-curse-0514-20150505-story.html

Monday, April 27, 2015

No to Brockton casino



The YouTube video below is of REVEL, the twice bankrupt Mega Monster in Atlantic City that CLOSED:






Why would Massachusetts believe it is 'DIFFERENT' and exempt from the problems experienced elsewhere with Predatory Gambling?


DONNA LEWIS, Brockton: No to Brockton casino

Posted Apr. 27, 2015 at 12:01 AM
Updated at 7:17 AM 



I vote no for a casino in Brockton. I believe it will cause more violence, poverty and hungry, homeless children. Why bring another addiction into this already addicted city.
Can't Mayor Bill Carpenter and other city officials figure another more productive way to bring revenue and jobs to Brockton? Ways to not encourage more crime?
DONNA LEWIS
Brockton
http://www.enterprisenews.com/article/20150427/OPINION/304289999/1007/OPINION



COLLEEN ROBERTS, Brockton: Casino isn’t the right solution for Brockton


Posted Apr. 22, 2015 at 8:54 PM
Updated Apr 22, 2015 at 8:57 PM 



In regards to the proposed casino here in Brockton, I’d like to express my strong no vote (“Brockton casino proposal coming down to ‘yes’ or ‘no,’” April 15).
I don’t believe a casino is the answer to the many needs the city of Brockton has. As residents of the city since 1983 and having raised our children here, my husband and I have a deep concern about the city’s future. The bright picture that the gaming company and Mayor Bill Carpenter are painting has a dark underbelly that will suck the life out of our city.
When I was growing up in Omaha, Nebraska, at one point my family lived near a horse racing track. My father gambled, (mostly poker), but he also delved into the ponies. One payday he lost his entire check and we had an empty refrigerator. Imagine that happening thousands of times over when hardworking people hope for riches and end up in rags.
The gaming company is out to make the owners wealthy, not the residents of Brockton and the surrounding towns. I believe that the cities and towns around casinos do not prosper and that gambling invites more crime. As if we don’t have enough drugs, gang activity, prostitution, murders and other crimes of our own to deal with! Our children and young people deserve better than this.
The gaming company will promise the world to get a foothold in Brockton. I don’t believe the company will deliver on any of it. The casino will come, make its millions, and leave our city worse off.
There is a better way to change our beloved Brockton into the kind of city families will flock to.



http://www.patriotledger.com/article/20150422/OPINION/150428366/2014/OPINION



Harrah's [now Caesars, the bankrupt disaster]] determined that 90% of their profits came from 10% of their patrons, a fact they have never disputed. 
That's GAMBLING ADDICTION! 

The Gambling Industry exists only by creating NEW Gambling Addicts. 

Studies have determined that proximity increases GAMBLING ADDICTION - the closer a Slot Barn is to you, the more likely you'll GAMBLE, the more likely you or someone you know will become a GAMBLING ADDICT.


When a public hearing was conducted in Raynham, no single person asked questions about Parx Gambling operation in Pennsylvania. 

In 2011, I posted this: 
Parx: The McDonald's of Gambling Addiction and Child Abandonment 

Parx, an indistinguishable Slot Barn, has become the poster child for Child Abandonment..... 

Parx is only casino with child-abandonment problem..... 

"You said 150 to 200 times a year," he repeated. "That's three to four times a week, essentially." 

"Yes," Jonas confirmed, most of his players fit that profile. In fact, because Parx players tend to live within 20 miles of Street Road, many go even more frequently. 

"We have customers," Jonas boasted, "who give us $25, $30 five times a week." 

At the end of the Yellow Brick Road, there is NO Wizard and no Magic Formula for politicians bereft of ideas who allow themselves to be dazzled by false promises

Saturday, April 18, 2015

Casino cafes aren’t good for local economies







In the Spotlight: Casino cafes aren’t good for local economies

By Dave Zickar
Posted Apr. 17, 2015 at 7:35 PM
Updated Apr 17, 2015 at 7:41 PM



Corporations have quietly been opening hundreds of casino cafes in neighborhoods across the state over the past several months. Just 10 corporations are operating 185 cafes already, and they’ve announced plans to open hundreds more.
The spread of casino cafes is an unintended consequence of the Video Gaming Act that is undermining its intent and integrity. Casino cafes are not taverns or restaurants but gaming businesses. In other states where cafes metastasized, slot income was reportedly more than 90 percent of their annual business.
These cafes are a threat to the small businesses owners of bars and restaurants and those who run VFWs and American Legion Halls. We are concerned because when customers go to a casino cafe, they aren’t visiting our establishments to buy a meal or a beverage; rather, they’re putting their money into corporate slot machines that ship the revenue out of East Peoria.
This gaming entertainment is readily available at the more than 4,000 legitimate bars, restaurants, truck stops and fraternal orders licensed in the state. Casino cafes are the lowest form of hospitality business possible. They offer a minimal menu, operate out of a small storefront and have just enough staff to keep the lights on and the slots spinning, sometimes for 20 hours a day.
While East Peoria makes a nickel of every dollar earned at a cafe, that is offset by the lost economic activity at legitimate neighborhood restaurants and taverns. The economic progress casino cafes claim to generate are an illusion because their gains come at the expense of already established community-based businesses.
For many small business owners, video gaming has been a welcome source of new revenue. Left unchecked, these cafes will undermine the hospitality industry video gaming was supposed to assist. Towns like Springfield, Rockford and Loves Park have been overrun with dozens of cafes that snatched up valuable real estate. Locally, Emma’s Eatery in Peoria has siphoned over $490,000 out of town and has only been operational for a year. Emma’s is part of a corporate chain that currently has 50 locations and a total slot revenue of $83.7 million. Are these the kind of businesses we want in our town?
Local mayors need to be given the power to prevent casino cafes from swarming our communities. State Sen. Darin LaHood of Peoria has already filed a bill in Springfield (SB 1794) to give local government more power to work with business owners to create appropriate liquor license and gaming regulations.
Small businesses need to stand together against the onslaught of corporate casino cafes. We spent decades trying to legalize video gaming for our businesses, and now, just two years later, corporate interests have swept in to open pop-up casino cafes.

Dave Zickar owns the Brass Key Lounge in East Peoria.



 http://www.pjstar.com/article/20150417/OPINION/150419279/2011/OPINION#OPINION/?Start=1&_suid=1429405081898007247385016021002

Florida shouldn't repeat the gambling mistakes of other states






Florida shouldn't repeat the gambling mistakes of other states






The Sun Sentinel's five-day editorial series on gambling could have introduced some perspective and coherence into the ongoing debate on gambling in Florida. But if there was a comprehensive solution presented, I sure couldn't find it.

The recurring theme was that more gambling is good gambling even if we already have more than the market can absorb. The editorials backed more gambling for the Seminole Tribe, more gambling for pari-mutuels and more gambling by creation of two mega-casinos in Miami-Dade and Broward counties. The Sun Sentinel's "all of the above" position would hurt Florida's economy, our quality of life and the character of our communities.

The gambling market is already saturated, as was reported by the Sun Sentinel last year. There are too many casinos too close to each other, without enough customers to go around.

How does shifting customers from one casino to another create economic benefits? How does taking money from existing businesses like restaurants, hotels, bars and movie theaters and funneling it to an expanded gambling industry help our economy?

It's happening all over the country. As casino business declines, states that are dependent on gambling revenues frantically approve more and more gambling to cover their losses, and even give giving taxpayer bailouts to keep casinos afloat.

Atlantic City is just one many examples of casinos going bust.

The stakes for Florida, and its highly successful family tourism brand, couldn't be more serious. Why would we trade what's working here for what is failing across America?

Federal law and agreements in place with native tribes mean that the pell-mell addition of new games or new locations could result in an explosion of gambling. The resulting costs in terms of addicted gamblers and the crimes they commit in furtherance of that addiction far outweigh any short-term benefit.

Florida needs a gambling policy that starts with a recognition that the intent of the Florida Constitution is to require any expansion of gambling to be decided by the people by constitutional amendment.

John Sowinski is president of No Casinos Inc.


http://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/fl-viewpoint-casinos-20150418-story.html


Saturday, March 14, 2015

Potential casino coming to South Bend




Potential casino coming to South Bend

Posted: Mar 13, 2015

More slot machines and table games could be coming to Michiana if plans are approved to build a casino in South Bend.
The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians got a response from the Federal Government on Thursday after a proposal they submitted two years ago.
They are seeking Trust Land to create a Tribal Village but now that they have a response, they are in the first step of a very lengthy process.

If they are able to get that Trust Land approved, it will be their decision in how they want to use it.

The Pokagon Band released a statement that said in part: "The Pokagon Band is seeking Trust Land to create a Tribal Village with the necessary infrastructure and services to support its citizens, including affordable housing, government and administrative offices, a community center, and health services. To fund this infrastructure and services, the Pokagon Band will also build a Four Winds Casino on the South Bend site, which will create jobs and provide continued economic support to the Pokagon Band and surrounding communities."

The Pokagon Band will use the Four Winds Casino to help sustain its community but some people are opposed to building a casino in South Bend.

According to Jake Teshka who is involved with the grassroots organization Citizens for a Better Michiana, he has seen studies based in cities where casinos are built.

“In areas where casinos are, crime can spike, violent crimes can spike as much as ten percent,” said Teshka.

He also thinks that small businesses could suffer as a result of the casino.

“By building a casino what we're doing is cutting off any future possibility of having major consumers in small business," Teshka added.

However, the Four Winds Casino in New Buffalo was built in 2007 and according to New Buffalo Township Supervisor Rose Dudiak it has been a success.

“This casino has been a win-win situation for us. The things we've been able to do in the township have been incredible. We would not be able to do them without the casino,” Dudiak said.

She also said the casino has brought in enough money that the New Buffalo Township Hall will soon go through a two million dollar renovation.

If the casino is built, it has the potential of bringing in about 2,000 permanent jobs and about 1,500 temporary construction jobs.

That is something South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg thinks will be good for the city.

“We got to work with them, figure out exactly what the plans are and how the city fits in but as long as this happens in the context of an overall agreement that benefits the city, benefits the community, then I think it could be a very positive thing for South Bend,” said Mayor Buttigieg.

The location of this land is near the U.S. 20 Bypass and covers 166 acres.


http://www.abc57.com/story/28491607/potential-casino-coming-to-south-bend