Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Shinnecocks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shinnecocks. Show all posts

Monday, July 18, 2016

How gambling and greedy governments may shape the future of Long Island





Greg Blass


How gambling and greedy governments may shape the future of Long Island




Should the Islandia Marriott Long Island Hotel, on the LIE’s north service road, be permitted a betting parlor? This would be a Suffolk County OTB “mini-casino.” If a Buffalo based developer has his way, he would buy the entire hotel, and lease space to OTB to operate a racing simulcast facility along with 1,000 video lottery terminals. This latest legalized gambling project for Long Island is worth our discussion, and gives good reason to look at the big, changing, gambling picture here and nationwide.
Blass_Greg_head_badgeThe Islandia Village Board held public hearings for this mini-casino project. Things did not go well. Citizens largely opposed it, concerned about a rise in crime and traffic, and a negative impact on property values. So the board scheduled for last Tuesday its vote for a special permit for the hotel’s mini-casino. But this pending vote put the village board members on edge. Then, with the vote a mere 24 hours away, these politicians got creative – they canceled the vote altogether. They gave no reasons, but clearly they relished the comfort of putting things off. One civic leader did say the mayor told him that they needed more time to look into things.
What overall has become of legalized gambling of late? In New York alone, how much of government life has it become? Will the big money that drives it bring it to the East End, maybe even to EPCAL at Calverton? Can local politicians resist the allure of its almost magical revenue? Does what’s best for working people and families matter at all?
A new book entitled, From Steel to Slots – Casino Capitalism in the Postindustrial City by Chloe E. Taft is a good place to start. Her enlightening history about gambling also describes the impact of a casino in a working family town, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
In little more than half a century, the United States has become a gambling nation. In the early 60s, Nevada was the only state on the map allowing casino gambling. None had lotteries. From then till now, however, what a change! Today, 28 states host casinos owned by American Indian tribes. Nineteen states boast of commercial casinos (i.e. run by private companies). Fourteen states permit racetracks offering casino gambling at “racinos.” Lotteries as we know them here in New York, are the pride of 44 state governments as well as Washington D.C. Utah and Hawaii are the only two left of those 49 in the early ’60s where both lotteries and casinos remain illegal. And how the legalized gambling states crave that revenue for enlarging government operations without raising taxes! But they raise taxes anyway – gambling just helps feed the growing government gorilla.
Just as government’s addiction to growth feeds increasingly on government-sponsored gambling, there grows as well an addiction to gambling among ordinary, hard-working folk. In a cruel irony, cash-hungry states feed on the uncontrollable urge of many people to keep on gambling despite the toll it takes on their lives. The American Gambling Association reports there are now more than 6 million adult compulsive gambling Americans addicted to gambling. And a study out of UCLA-San Diego found that both visitors and residents of gaming communities experience “significantly higher levels of suicide.” This study is one of several showing that Las Vegas “displays the highest levels of suicide in the nation.” Needless to say, Nevada has the highest level of addicted gamblers in the US.
The spreading ink blot of legalized gambling had all to do with one state permitting it so as not to lose gambling bucks to another where it had already been permitted – a sort of peer pressure among state governments. State by state, lotteries and casinos have almost imperceptibly become a normal feature of American life, right under the nose of the federal government and even the national news media.
As From Steel to Slots would tell it, the Bethlehem experience is quite instructive. As in New York and New Jersey, the Pennsylvania state legislature designated places where a casino would be permitted, and Bethlehem is one of them. In an effort to fill a void left by that city’s defunct steel industry, Bethlehem’s commercial casino draws all the gamblers it can from New York and New Jersey by the busload. The lingering fear in Bethlehem, however, is that all the jobs, revenues for governments, charitable donations and prosperity will prove temporary just as it did in Atlantic City, where the winning promise of gambling hit the money, only to be followed by bankrupt casinos lining the boardwalk. Pennsylvania has done well so far, but how reliable is their transition from manufacturing steel to manufacturing entertainment?
Lotteries are far different, employ few and build nothing. Yet lotteries put government in the proverbial catbird’s seat, raking in revenue from a form of gambling that they permit, then sponsor, then profit from.
Our own New York sponsors lotteries, and permits charitable and “pari-mutual” gambling as well as racetrack betting and parlors. It does not permit commercial casinos, but does allow American Indian casinos, whose revenues are dedicated to tribal purposes (with fat shares for greedy state and local governments.)
Long Island’s own Shinnecock Nation strives to lay claim to what had been its own lands on the East End. Their tenacity in court already gained them crucial tribal recognition, and if they hold out, who knows where their claim may go to enlarge their nation’s territory by many square miles on the South Fork. Any odds?
Shinnecock tribal leaders publicly state their aim with land reclamation is to gain “leverage” in locating a site for a casino, including one clearly attractive site, EPCAL at Calverton. EPCAL as a gambling center continues to be the subject of discussion among developers, real estate brokers, bankers and politicians. The Shinnecocks hear many a whispered word of encouragement from vested interests in New York City and Albany, and from as far away as the West Coast. The Shinnecocks are a far more sophisticated group than some want to admit, and they enjoy the advantage of being underestimated. Other Long Island tribes are moving in the same direction.
Suffice it to say that a tribal casino for Long Island is not as far-fetched an idea as it may have seemed, irrespective of where it is located. The intrigue continues. If, or when, it gains momentum, it will make the current mini-casino saga in Islandia look like small potatoes. The broader, long-term question persists: with casino gambling and all the “prosperity” it supposedly offers: Will Long Island’s own “Lady Luck” hang in, or run out?
Greg Blass has spent his life in public service since he enlisted in the U.S. Navy as a teenager. He has worked in the private sector as an attorney and served six terms representing the East End in the Suffolk County Legislature, where he was also presiding officer. Greg has worked as an adjunct professor at Suffolk County Community College, as Greenport village attorney, as N.Y. State family court judge and as Suffolk County social services commissioner. Now retired, Greg is active in volunteer work and is a member of the board of directors of several charities. A resident of Jamesport, he and his wife Barbara have two grown children.





Saturday, February 16, 2013

Nassau Residents Against Gambling Enterprise Development

When New York State was hungry to $$$, instead of sound fiscal policy or addressing systemic fiscal issues, they stuck OTB parlors in low income, minority neighborhoods, successfully destroying communities, inviting drugs, increased crime and driving our local businesses.

Now, Governor Cuomo has consumed too much Casino KoolAid, failed to conduct his due diligence and proposing to plunk more Predatory Gambling outlets around to state.


Sorry for you, New York! Maybe rescinding some of the tax breaks to profitable businesses would make sense instead of targeting the poor.  


Nassau County Casino Proposals Slammed by Anti-Gambling Group

By on February 14, 2013
 
About a dozen members of a new anti-gambling group declared their opposition Thursday to any proposals to build a casino in Nassau County, citing quality of life concerns and worries that a deal to bring Atlantic City-style gaming to Long Island could be in the works.

The group dubbed themselves Nassau Residents Against Gambling Enterprise Development, or N-RAGED for short, during their debut press conference on the steps of the Supreme Court building in Mineola. Members of various neighborhood civic organizations as well as current and former local Democratic lawmakers round out its ranks.

“We are afraid that our suburban quality of life will be torn apart by some backroom deal in Albany,” said Dave Mejias, an attorney, a former Nassau legislator and the chairman of N-RAGED. “We want to make sure that Long Island is not going to be sold out to those special interests.”

He was referring to Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s proposal to legalize casino gambling in New York State, a plan that requires a second consecutive vote of approval in the State Legislature before voters ultimately decide its fate in a referendum. The Shinnecock Indian Nation in Southampton has been scouting for a location to build a gaming facility since winning federal recognition in 2010.

Despite the timing of the rally about an hour after fellow Democratic former Nassau County Executive Tom Suozzi held a press conference announcing his intentions to reclaim his old position, Mejias maintained that the group was “a-political.” Nevertheless, participants praised Suozzi’s agenda and criticized the Republican who unseated him, Ed Mangano, for proposing a casino at Nassau Coliseum. Also speaking at the anti-casino rally was Nassau Legis. Delia DeRiggi-Whitton, another Democrat from Suozzi’s hometown of Glen Cove.

“It’s a question of whether or not we really want to push gambling,” said DeRiggi-Whitton, adding that she prefers alternative proposals to build sports or research centers that have been floated for Uniondale and Elmont. She and others also expressed concerns that bringing casino gambling to LI would further strain social services because there might be an increase of gambling addicts losing their homes after betting on cards and other games of chance and tearing their families apart.

Cuomo had said during his State of the State address last month that he thinks whatever casinos New York builds should be located upstate, drawing tourists from LI and New York City. When reminded of the governor’s idea, Mejias said it’s still possible LI could be dealt a gaming facility while negotiations continue.

Shinnecock Trustee Chairman Randy King told the Press in a statement that if and when the tribe settles on a potential location to open a casino, they are required by federal law to ask the community for input.

“There has not been any recent activity regarding Shinnecock gaming in Nassau County,” the statement read in part.

Aside from the aging coliseum in Uniondale, there have also been proposals in recent years to build a casino at the Belmont Racetrack in Elmont, where the latest development pitch is for a soccer stadium for the New York Cosmos.

A spokesman for State Sen. Dean Skelos (R-Rockville Centre), the co-leader of the chamber who has been instrumental in Belmont redevelopment talks, did not return a call for comment. Neither did a spokeswoman for Mangano.

“We spend a lot of money sending our kids away to college,” said Mejias. ”They’re not going to be able to live here if they come back to be cocktail waitresses and blackjack dealers.”

http://www.longislandpress.com/2013/02/14/nassau-county-casino-proposals-slammed-by-anti-gambling-group/

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Shinnecock Casino Fiasco




Push for Shinnecock casino plan stalls

Photo credit: Nancy Borowick | At the Resort World Casino in Jamaica, Queens, more than 4,000 video lottery terminals with varying themes spread out across the two floors. (July 27, 2012)
[PLEASE NOTE: The counts of Slot Machines keeps changing in each report. Can't they count?]
 
 
The Shinnecock Nation's longtime plans to launch a Long Island casino are being stalled by internal squabbles and wavering political support.

The casino effort comes as competition for gaming dollars is intensifying, with the growth of racinos within the state, new casinos opening in neighboring states and some Indian casinos such as Foxwoods in Connecticut struggling financially. The tribe also faces the prospect of as many as seven new non-Indian gaming ventures in the state if Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo's proposed referendum on commercial gaming is approved next year.

Until July, the Shinnecock and its backers at Gateway Casino Resorts of Detroit had been negotiating to acquire an 80-acre parcel in Yaphank adjacent to the Brookhaven Rail Terminal. But delays in seeking full tribal approval for the site, and authorizing a $3 million check for an option to purchase the land, ultimately led the deal to fall through.

Shinnecock spokeswoman Beverly Jensen and a spokeswoman for the rail terminal declined to comment.

Lack of progress 'alarming'

"It's alarming," Suffolk Legis. Wayne Horsley (D-Lindenhurst) said of the lack of progress on a casino. "They have friends out there who want them to succeed, but the issue has gone quiet.

"It's disturbing and it's sad," said Horsley, who formed a legislative gaming task force to help the tribe find sites for a casino in Suffolk County.

The tribe won federal recognition in October 2010 after a 30-year effort, sealing its status as a sovereign nation eligible for governmental, housing, police and health programs, and gaining the right to open casinos and lower-level gaming facilities.

Two years later, the tribe remains determined to better its lot -- even as frustration increases over the lack of progress. Just last week, four tribal leaders, who were removed from their posts last month amid allegations they were negotiating business deals without tribal authority, argued before the tribe that their efforts were for nongaming enterprises and were for the long-term benefit of the tribe.

The official removal of trustees Lance Gumbs and Gordell Wright, men who are frequently the voice and face of the nation, has left those who typically interact with the tribe wondering what comes next.

The men have denied wrongdoing and their removal remains subject to a tribal investigation. The tribe called the decision an "internal" matter.

Tribal chairman Randy King declined to be interviewed.

Former New York Gov. David A. Paterson, who wrote a letter while in office backing the tribe's recognition request, suggested the Shinnecock's unwillingness to pursue a casino in communities that have opposed them may be slowing its progress.

"They have their internal squabbles, but they have also tried to show a sense that they want to be good neighbors," Paterson said. He added that any other group given the leeway the tribe has won through federal recognition "would have taken advantage of their status."
Jon Schneider, Suffolk County's deputy executive, acknowledged that "there have not been any recent developments regarding the Shinnecocks or a casino" in Suffolk.

For tribal members, the hope that blossomed with federal recognition has gradually segued into frustration. Anii Brown, chairwoman of the tribal council, an advisory group, in many ways represented that hope. A 30-year-old entrepreneur with her own marketing and promotions company, she made the decision recently to leave Shinnecock to launch a business venture with an Ojibway woman from Arizona.

"It's a good time to get away," she said of her decision to leave the reservation after 29 years.
"The gaming part puts a different dimension of division," she said. "It's personal now, it's families and everybody's fighting. It's caused drama and internal strife."

Brown and others have put some of the blame on Cuomo, whom tribal members say has declined to meet with the tribe to discuss a gaming compact and other economic development. Cuomo "needs to be willing to sit down with us," she said. "This is about the survival of an entire people."
A spokesman for Cuomo did not respond to a request seeking comment.

Tribe's lobbying efforts

Tribal efforts to lobby the state have been considerable. Last year, tribal financial backer Gateway paid former Sen. Alfonse D'Amato's lobbying firm, Park Strategies, $97,500, according to state lobbying records. The firm largely lobbied the State Senate to back a casino, the records show. A Park Strategies spokeswoman didn't return a phone call seeking comment.

The tribe also has hired law firm Meyer Suozzi English & Klein, among other firms, to lobby the State Assembly on its behalf for a tribal casino, records show.

A person close to the tribe who is familiar with those efforts said it's not so much Cuomo's refusal to meet with the Shinnecock tribe as the tribe's need to push ahead and galvanize support that has slowed its casino efforts.

"I don't believe the governor is necessarily the obstacle," said the person, who is not authorized to speak for the tribe. "They don't have a site in Suffolk. That's the number one issue. [And] they have to clean up the mess they have internally."

Support disappearing

The person also said the tribe holds out hope for a casino at Belmont Park in Nassau County, a site that was prominent in the tribe's plan, until Cuomo said earlier this year that the site would "not make sense" given its proximity to the racino at the Aqueduct Racetrack.

A contingent of largely Republican state lawmakers who earlier backed the tribe's plan for a Belmont casino now appear opposed to it.

"A casino at Belmont is not going to happen," said Joe Rizza, a spokesman for Sen. Jack Martins (R-Mineola).

Asked why, he said, "Upon further study, a casino wasn't a viable option for the site and there wasn't a consensus among the communities that would be affected by a casino."

Nassau County Executive Edward Mangano, who initially proposed the site last year after support for a casino at Nassau Coliseum collapsed, also withdrew support.

"While there is no pending agreement with the Shinnecock Nation, we are always open to meeting with the leadership," Mangano spokeswoman Katie Grilli-Robles said.
 

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Graton Rancheria: BIA Ignores State Court Action





Stop the Casino 101 Coalition

Feds Ignore State Court Issues, Approve Graton Gambling Compact http://conta.cc/L6ydZy

Feds Ignore State Court Issues, Approve Graton Gambling Compact
Check out my latest campaign by Constant Contact.
 

... Stop the Casino 101 Coalition (STC101) has learned from the Bureau of Indian Affairs Gaming Office (202-219-4066) that the Graton Rancheria gambling compact will be signed today by Indian Affairs Assistant Secretary Donald Laverdure.
 
 
Please forward this to your lists
We depend on you to spread the word!

www.stopthecasino101.com
Stop the Casino 101 Coalition
The Voice of the People
 
 
Feds Ignore State Court Action, Approve Graton Rancheria Gambling Compact
Federal government "meddling" in state legal issue
Stop the Casino 101 Coalition (STC101) has learned from the Bureau of Indian Affairs Gaming Office (202-219-4066) that the Graton Rancheria gambling compact will be signed today by Indian Affairs Assistant Secretary Donald Laverdure.
"We are very disappointed with this news," said Pastor Chip Worthington, founder of STC101. "Washington has once again ignored the will of the people in this matter. They are meddling in a state legal issue"
"A lawsuit is currently in state court challenging the very legality of the compact, which is governed by state law, not federal law," he said.
On May 21, 2012, Stop the Casino 101 Coalition and local residents filed a lawsuit in state court challenging the legality of the compact. The lawsuit argues that jurisdiction over land does not automatically pass to the federal government and Indian tribe upon purchase of title, but that the land remains governed by state law unless and until the state formally cedes jurisdiction, which it has not done. That means casino gambling is illegal on the site.
"Washington is ignoring this litigation and thumbing it's nose at the people of Sonoma County and the State of California."
"Secretary Laverdure has signed a compact that hasn't yet been shown to be legal under California state law."

Area residents are also very concerned about the environmental issues that were ignored by the study done for the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria (FIGR) casino project. 68% of area residents remain opposed to the Graton Rancheria casino.
The company that performed the environmental study, Analytical Environmental Services, has come under a cloud of suspicion for multiple violations of the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) for another tribal casino study it did.
"This casino is an environmental disaster," said Pastor Worthington. "It will put 40,000 more car trips on Highway 101 every day and will increase crime, pollution and domestic violence in our community."
"The NEPA study was joke, its use in the compact was criminal, and the compact itself is criminal. That's why we went to court."
STC101 believes the gambling compact to be a state issue that must be decided in our state courts, as is the right of all Californians..
With one lawsuit already in the state courts, now that the compact has been approved by Washington, STC101 might now raise a challenge in federal court.
Tribes Spending Millions on Capitol Hill and in Statehouses Across the Nation to Get Their Way
From McClatchy Newspapers Read the Article
"WASHINGTON - After buying a new chunk of land 50 miles north of San Francisco, the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria just broke ground on a new, Las Vegas-style casino. It will be the largest in the Bay Area, with 3,000 slot machines, 200 hotel rooms, a spa, bars, restaurants and parking for more than 5,000 cars.
"In New York, the Shinnecock Indian Nation is considering Long Island as a site on which to build the Big Apple's first tribal casino.
"And in Washington state, the Spokane Tribe of Indians wants a new 13-story casino and hotel next to the Fairchild Air Force Base, prompting fears that the city will become "Spo-Vegas."
"The plans are extraordinary for one reason: In all three cases, the tribes want to build their palaces on new land that's not part of their original reservations.
"The expansions are the latest twist in the nation's Indian casino wars, and they mark a major shift for the tribes, which already run 385 casinos and bingo halls in 29 states."
Fix in the Works for RP Sewer Deal? Stay Tuned!

 

Friday, July 6, 2012

Reservation Shopping: Opening the Floodgates





In a new twist, Indian tribes moving to open more casinos far from home

After buying a new chunk of land 50 miles north of San Francisco, the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria just broke ground on a new, Las Vegas-style casino. It will be the largest in the Bay Area, with 3,000 slot machines, 200 hotel rooms, a spa, bars, restaurants and parking for more than 5,000 cars.

Published: 07/05/12
 
 
After buying a new chunk of land 50 miles north of San Francisco, the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria just broke ground on a new, Las Vegas-style casino. It will be the largest in the Bay Area, with 3,000 slot machines, 200 hotel rooms, a spa, bars, restaurants and parking for more than 5,000 cars.

In New York, the Shinnecock Indian Nation is considering Long Island as a site on which to build the Big Apple’s first tribal casino. And in Washington state, the Spokane Tribe of Indians wants a new 13-story casino and hotel next to the Fairchild Air Force Base, prompting fears that the city will become “Spo-Vegas.”

The plans are extraordinary for one reason: In all three cases, the tribes want to build their palaces on new land that’s not part of their original reservations.

The expansions are the latest twist in the nation’s Indian casino wars, and they mark a major shift for the tribes, which already run 385 casinos and bingo halls in 29 states.

Since the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for large-scale Indian gambling 25 years ago, tribes have been forced to keep the majority of their casinos on reservation land held in trust by the federal government, usually in remote regions far from public view.

But now, thanks in part to the Obama administration, Indian tribes across the country are ready to bust out, bringing gambling to the same land that was taken from them so long ago, when the U.S. government executed its bloody campaign to relocate Indians to a patchwork of lands across the country and eventually to reservations.

In Oklahoma, the Kialegee Tribal Town went so far as to propose a casino half a continent away, on the coast of Georgia, on land that it said it once occupied, raising the specter of tribes going across state lines to pursue new gambling ventures.

Tribes are seeking to cash in on a loosening of the rules, announced in June 2011, when the Bureau of Indian Affairs junked a Bush-era requirement that a casino had to be within easy driving distance from a tribe’s reservation.

The decision by Larry Echo Hawk, who at the time was head of the bureau and is an enrolled member of the Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma, marked a clear win for the tribes, which have become big players in Washington’s power-and-money politics. In recent years, they’ve steered 70 percent of their political contributions toward the Democratic Party and President Barack Obama.

Casino opponents now fear that the tribes, with their sovereign status, will have far too much authority to do as they please on their new land, especially as they press for even less federal control.

And from coast to coast, the tribes are finding plenty of resistance as they angle to get closer to big cities, busy freeways, military bases, even popular national parks.

In the small desert town of Joshua Tree, Calif., Victoria Fuller said she worries what might happen if the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians is allowed to open a new off-reservation casino near the entrance to the popular Joshua Tree National Park.

"They could do anything they want,” said Fuller, the president of the Joshua Tree Community Association and a leading opponent of the plan. “They could put a 20-story building with spotlights on it, and we would have no say.”

The new push by the tribes is aimed at reviving a $28 billion-a-year industry hit hard by the recession. After growing at a brisk 14 percent annual rate from 1995 to 2007, gaming revenues have essentially stalled out, increasing by only 1 percent a year.

And it comes as the 240 tribes that run casinos face an onslaught of new competition, from states eager to get a cut of the gaming business with lotteries and new casinos of their own, to poker players who want Congress to legalize online gaming this year. The changes will allow tribes to move into new markets creating competition not only for existing Indian casinos, but also for gambling centers such as Las Vegas and Atlantic City, N.J.

The move already has ignited a debate over how quickly the U.S. will hit a saturation point with casinos. While polls show broad public support for gambling, some say the tribes are ready to push the envelope.

“The tribes are going to try to run the table, which means they’re going to try to move as many casinos off-reservation as quickly as possible,” said John Kindt, a gambling researcher and professor of business and legal policy at the University of Illinois. “It’s just all about the money, and the model is very simple: It’s to get as many slot machines as possible as close to maximum-population areas. … They’re going to go everywhere.”





Art Reber, a retired professor from Point Roberts, Wash., and the co-author of “Gambling for Dummies,” said that the market ultimately will determine whether the tribes are overplaying their hands.

“When you start sticking neon signs and huge casinos at the Joshua Tree entrance, it starts to get a little ugly,” Reber said. “If you overbuild, you will hurt yourself, and I’m not sure the tribes are necessarily sensitive to these market issues. There’s a saturation point here that you can’t go beyond.”

The epicenter of the battle is in California, one of six states — along with Washington, Florida, Oklahoma, Arizona and Connecticut — that account for more than two-thirds of all Indian gaming revenue.

The Golden State already has more than 60 Indian casinos, the most in the nation. And when Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California introduced a bill last year that would make it harder for tribes to buy new land for gaming, she said the state could easily have another 50 casinos in coming years if Congress doesn’t stop them. Feinstein warned that another 67 tribes in the state were already seeking federal recognition, the first step toward getting a casino. And she said “the problem is only going to get worse,” with some tribes vying to open new casinos more than 100 miles from their tribal headquarters.

In many ways, the move marks the coming of age for Indian gaming, which started small with bingo halls in Florida in the late 1970s but then exploded in a way that few envisioned. But experts say it’s just common business sense for tribes to try to go to places where they can woo more gamblers.

“Just like real estate, it’s all location, location, location,” said Barry Brandon, the former chief of staff for the National Indian Gaming Commission and now a New York-based consultant who works with tribes. An enrolled member of the Muscogee Nation and the former senior president of the Seneca Gaming Corp., he helped the Seneca Nation of Indians open an off-reservation casino in downtown Buffalo, N.Y., which now is being expanded and which tribal officials tout as a national model for urban settings.

The 1988 law passed by Congress has always allowed off-reservation casinos. But they’re extremely rare, with only a handful approved by the federal government.

Backers say that dropping the “commutable distance standard” adopted by the Bush administration will lead to more off-reservation casinos and help tribes create more jobs. That, they say, is just as President Ronald Reagan and Congress envisioned when they passed the law allowing tribes to get into the big leagues of gambling.

But even some tribal officials are leery, worried that off-reservation casinos stray far from the original intent of the law, which they say clearly was aimed at keeping the casinos on reservation land.

“I think Indian gaming had good intentions — it was intended to help tribes, but there are ways that I think it can be used to get away from what its intentions were. … We’ve been worried about off-reservation gaming,” said Chris Mercier, a tribal council member for the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde in Oregon. The tribe has gone to court to try to block its neighboring tribe, the once landless Cowlitz Indian Tribe of Washington state, from opening a casino on a 152-acre site it bought near La Center.

Because it still takes years to plow through the bureaucracy to actually open a casino, it’s far too soon to know whether the tribes will experience large-scale success in moving beyond their borders.
But the early signs are telling.

In California, gambling opponents say the new approach already has resulted in a flood of new applications for tribes to acquire more property. Casino opponents who are tracking the tribes’ activities said that at least 137 applications from California are pending with the Bureau of Indian Affairs, which must sign off on the land transfers before casinos can be built. The bureau would not disclose how many applications it has received in other states or across the country and has yet to respond to a formal request for the data, filed in May by McClatchy under the federal Freedom of Information Act.

Cheryl Schmit, founder and director of Stand Up For California, a statewide organization that has been leading the fight against more casinos, called the rule change a mistake and said, if allowed to stand, it could result in casinos opening “on every off-ramp.”

The tribes already have the largest land trust in the nation, at more than 56 million acres. And when the Bureau of Indian Affairs pitched its $2.5 billion budget request to Congress in February, Echo Hawk, who resigned in April to accept a position with the Mormon church, boasted that it had processed 697 applications from 2009 to 2011, acquiring more than 157,000 acres of new trust land for the tribes and individual members.

Nedra Darling, a spokeswoman for the BIA, said the amount of land held by the Indians actually represents a sharp decline from the 130 million acres they had in 1887. And she said the bulk of the land applications approved for tribes in the past few years have been for agriculture, infrastructure, housing and other projects, with only seven of 781 for gaming purposes, she said.

Schmit told a House subcommittee last year that tribes can easily change their minds and use their new land for gaming once it is placed into trust, even if they don’t make that clear in their initial applications.

She said that if the tribes’ new requests for land in California are approved, more than 15,000 acres will be transferred from local jurisdictions and put into federally protected trust land.

“Some of these are just land grabs by wealthy tribes,” Schmit said, lamenting that the tribes are making their push to expand with little attention from either the press or the public. “It’s huge, but everybody’s kind of been numbed by all the gambling,” she said. “It’s here, but nobody really sees the expansion of it.”

With the financial stakes so high, the push to expand has ignited growing warfare among the tribes, which are quick to feud over everything from the placement of new casinos to whether smaller tribes that lack casinos will be allowed to enter the fray.

“Tribes are acting more like states now,” said Kathryn Rand, co-director and a founder of the Institute for the Study of Tribal Gaming Law and Policy at the University of North Dakota.

She said that there already has been one big change caused by Indian gaming: Tribes can now spend millions on Capitol Hill and in statehouses across the nation to try to get their way. While the tribes did nothing illegal, their money fueled the Jack Abramoff scandal, one of the biggest to hit the nation’s capital in the past decade, in which the super-lobbyist known as “Casino Jack” represented tribes with gambling interests and ended up in prison.

























Since 1990, the Indian gaming industry has made political contributions of nearly $58 million, with 70 percent of the money going to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. And the tribes also have been spending heavily on lobbying, more than $20 million in 2011 alone.

“The thing that makes that remarkable is that 20 years ago it wouldn’t have occurred to anyone that tribes would ever have enough money to have that kind of political influence,” Rand said.

Schmit and other opponents say the relaxed rules on off-reservation casinos are merely a payoff to the tribes, which have made the president their top recipient of campaign cash in the last two years.

Obama was a favorite for the tribes even as a senator from Illinois: Among all senators who have served since 1990, he ranks fourth in contributions, with $259,000, trailing only Democratic Sens. Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray of casino-rich Washington state and Hawaii Democratic Sen. Daniel Inouye. In 2011 and 2012, Obama has received $140,500 from Indian gaming interests, more than any other presidential candidate or member of Congress, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan research group.

Opponents hope that both the courts and Congress ultimately will slow the tribes’ momentum.

Last month, the Supreme Court denied a request by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to stop a lawsuit filed by a Michigan man who’s out to shut down the off-reservation Gun Lake Casino in southwestern Michigan. The case is significant because, if it ultimately succeeds, it could force the closing of an off-reservation casino long after it opened.

With the high court ruling against Salazar in an 8-1 decision on June 18, Schmit said the justices delivered a strong rebuke.


“The justices didn’t just say no to Secretary of the Interior Salazar’s argument and policy — they said, `Hell no!’ . . . The ruling is a game-changer,” said Schmit.

In Congress, both Feinstein and Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona are pushing bills to clamp down on off-reservation casinos. When she introduced the Tribal Gaming Eligibility Act last year, Feinstein said she wanted to end the practice of “unbridled reservation shopping.” Without congressional action, she warned, “Californians have no power to stop these tribes from opening unwanted casinos in their backyards.”

Feinstein personally intervened in one of the hottest fights in California, lobbying Salazar to kill the plan to open a casino in Joshua Tree. She has emerged as a powerful ally for casino opponents, serving as a veteran member on the appropriations subcommittee that’s in charge of the budget for the Interior Department and the BIA.

Fuller cheered Feinstein’s entry into the fray and said there is no shortage of gambling opportunities in Joshua Tree, with seven casinos already operating within an hour of the city. She said the tribes have created “a real ticking time bomb for communities and states.”




“I don’t think anybody ever envisioned that they would be able to go out and buy land and have casinos everywhere,” she said.

But Steve Gralla, chief financial officer for the Twenty-Nine Palms Band, said a new casino would create at least 100 new jobs. And he defended Obama’s new policy, saying, “It’s good to have options to continue to create economic development.”

The tribe has had its share of headaches. In May, a grand jury indicted its attorney in a land-buying scheme that led to bribery and money-laundering charges involving alleged kickbacks to others involved in construction projects. Gralla said the indictment would not affect the tribe’s casino plans, which are still under review.

“Nothing’s been 100 percent decided, so there’s not much to say, other than we’re still looking at all the different ways to go,” Gralla said.

Tribes are encountering many roadblocks elsewhere, too.

In California, a group called the Stop the Casino 101 Coalition has gone to court to try to block the Graton Rancheria tribe from building its off-reservation casino on a 252-acre site in Rohnert Park in Sonoma County. While Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown in March signed a tribal-state gaming compact allowing the tribe to build the casino, the citizens’ coalition said the federal government erred in allowing the land to be placed in trust for the tribe and that Brown had no right to sign the compact.

In New York, the Shinnecocks’ drive to open a casino has run into a headwind from Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo and many state legislators who are pushing to have the state open casinos of its own.

And in Washington state, the Spokane Tribe of Indians’ drive to open a casino in Airway Heights, a suburb of Spokane, has encountered opposition from the military, from the neighboring Kalispell Tribe of Indians and from a group called Citizens Against Casino Expansion.

But even with the new policy change, Brandon, the tribal consultant, said that tribes face a hard fight, noting that “getting land taken into trust off-reservation for gaming is a very, very difficult proposition.” He’s among those who argue that the current system is working and that there’s no need for Congress to get involved. He said the Bush administration “created the chilling effect that just stopped everything dead in its tracks.”

And with the change by the Obama administration, Brandon said, “You’re really kind of seeing the jam in the pipeline is being cleaned out.”

Kindt, the University of Illinois business professor who has testified on gambling issues on Capitol Hill, said that the tribes are expanding their operations with “just the illusion of regulation and the illusion of control,” and that Congress definitely needs to intervene. He said the situation is “like throwing gasoline on the fires of recession,” because gamblers are just transferring assets instead of spending their money to help the economy.

“It’s just out of control,” he said. “And if Congress doesn’t step in quickly, this is going to take our economy further into the quagmire. … I wish it would work, but you can’t gamble your way into prosperity.”

With so many new proposals pending, Rand, with the University of North Dakota’s Institute for the Study of Tribal Gaming Law and Policy, said the tribes run the risk of a public backlash as more casinos move into higher-profile locations. But she said that Indian gaming “is expanding not in a vacuum, but in response to a market.”

“Part of the reason — and perhaps the biggest reason — that we’ve seen such a rapid expansion in tribal gaming is because Americans love to gamble, and we have a much higher tolerance for legalized gambling than we did even 20 or 30 years ago,” Rand said.



Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/07/05/2205740/in-a-new-twist-indian-tribes-are.html#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/07/05/2205740/in-a-new-twist-indian-tribes-are.html#storylink=cpy
Isaac Brekken MCT
Art Reber, a retired professor from Point Roberts, Washington, and the co-author of "Gambling For Dummies," said that the market ultimately will determine if the tribes are overplaying their hands. "When you start sticking neon signs and huge casinos at the Joshua Tree entrance, it starts to get a little ugly," he said. "If you overbuild, you will hurt yourself, and I'm not sure the tribes are necessarily sensitive to these market issues. There's a saturation point here that you can't go beyond." Reber is photographed at a satellite poker game, Monday, June 11, 2012 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Isaac Brekken/MCT)

Even with relaxed casino rules, tribes could face many pitfalls
It’s unlikely that anyone will ever accuse the Bureau of Indian Affairs of acting in haste.

Just ask Bill Iyall, the chairman of the Cowlitz Tribe in Washington state: It took 26 years for the tribe to win federal recognition from the BIA, the first requirement for opening a casino. That happened in 2000. And after getting the Bureau of Indian Affairs to sign off on its purchase of 152 acres of new land — another requirement — the tribe is still fighting off opponents in federal court for the right to begin building its gambling empire near the town of La Center.

The Cowlitz Tribe’s experience offers an obvious lesson: Even with the Obama administration moving to make it easier to open off-reservation casinos, tribes still face a long, long road, with many potential pitfalls.

Under the change announced in June 2011, Larry Echo Hawk, then-head of the BIA, rescinded a 2008 Bush administration policy that banned off-reservation casinos if they were not within easy driving distance.

Echo Hawk, who resigned in April, said he was scrapping the so-called “commutable distance” rule because it had been adopted without any consultation with the tribes. The Bush administration’s rule had essentially frozen attempts by tribes to open new casinos beyond their reservations.

While that roadblock has been removed, tribes still must show a historical or legal connection to any new land that they seek to place in trust. If that is not possible, tribes must satisfy the BIA’s “two-part determination” in getting approval for an off-reservation casino.

Under that test, the secretary of the interior, who oversees the BIA, must consult with the tribe, neighboring tribes and state and local officials to assess whether the proposed casino is in the “best interests” of the community.

If the secretary decides that’s the case, the governor of a state must then agree.

The new proposals are likely to force the BIA to tackle tougher cases, with more landless tribes eager to begin gambling ventures.

“All of the easy and clear-cut decisions with respect with tribes being able to engage in gaming have been answered,” said Barry Brandon, former chief of staff for the National Indian Gaming Commission and now a New York-based consultant who works with tribes around the nation.

He predicted more applications from tribes “off the beaten track” that will assert that they have historical connections to land that might be more than 100 miles away from their headquarters.
Even if tribes can satisfy the BIA’s requirement, they could run into more snags from both Congress and the courts.

In the Senate, John McCain of Arizona and Dianne Feinstein of California have introduced bills to make it harder for tribes to buy new land for casinos.

McCain wants to reinstate the commutable-distance standard.

Feinstein wants to force tribes to show that their current members and ancestors have a link to the land, with a requirement that they prove both a “substantial direct modern connection” and a “substantial direct aboriginal connection.”

Two court cases, one involving the Cowlitz casino and another involving the Gun Lake Casino in Michigan, could go a long way toward settling the issue. In both cases, opponents claim the casinos on newly acquired land should not be allowed because they violate a 2009 Supreme Court ruling that said tribes not under federal jurisdiction by 1934 could not take new land into trust.

The Cowlitz case is expected to go to trial later this year in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.

And just two weeks ago, the Supreme Court said the Michigan case could go to trial as well, rejecting a request by the Obama administration to have the case dismissed. The administration argued unsuccessfully that it had sovereign immunity from lawsuits challenging its title to Indian trust lands.

Rob Hotakainen, staff writer

Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/07/05/2205740/in-a-new-twist-indian-tribes-are.html#storylink=cpy


http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/07/05/2205740/in-a-new-twist-indian-tribes-are.html


Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/07/05/2205740/in-a-new-twist-indian-tribes-are.html#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/07/05/2205740/in-a-new-twist-indian-tribes-are.html#storylink=cpy


Thursday, June 28, 2012

Federal Court Throws Out Injuction Blocking Shinnecocks From Building Hamptons Casino





This has interesting connections worth considering, explained here:

The Verifiable Truth

Federal Court Throws Out Injuction Blocking Shinnecocks From Building Hamptons Casino



A nearly five-year legal battle between the Shinnecock Indian Nation, the state of New York and the local Southampton Town has reached a turning point, or possibly an end.

This week, a federal appeals court has overruled a permanent injunction granted in 2008 by a federal judge at the request of the state and town that prevented the Shinnecocks from using the tribally owned Hampton Bays property called Westwoods for a casino, reported the Southampton Press. The tribe first proposed developing the site for gaming purposes in 2003.

The court has determined the case belonged in state court, rather than federal court, because it concerns local zoning jurisdictions. It will now be remanded back to a state court, although it remains unclear whether the state and town will instigate the fight again.

Immediately after the ruling, the tribe requested a meeting with Governor Andrew Cuomo to discuss the tribe’s economic development plans including a casino far from the originally proposed Southampton location—in western or central Suffolk County, Nassau County, or even New York City.

“Now that the Nation has been federally recognized as an Indian tribe and has been freed from the effects of that judgment and injunction, we again ask Governor Cuomo to sit down with the Nation to discuss how the Nation and the State can move forward together,” stated a tribal news release dated June 25. “Our ancestors and tribal leaders, both living and those who have gone before us, always have maintained our tribal lands for the benefit of all tribe members. This always will be our starting point for any discussions, and we look forward to finding an agreed basis with the State for realization of our common goals.”

The same judge who issued the injunction, Judge Joseph Bianco, also ordered in 2008 for the Bureau of Indian Affairs to expedite its excessively long federal recognition process. The Shinnecocks faced a 15-year-long or longer process. But two years later, in 2010, the tribe received federal recognition—the first step necessary to apply to build and operate a casino.


Read more:http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2012/06/26/federal-court-throws-out-injuction-blocking-shinnecocks-from-building-hamptons-casino-120561 http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2012/06/26/federal-court-throws-out-injuction-blocking-shinnecocks-from-building-hamptons-casino-120561#ixzz1z69GQJxC

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Grassroots Effort to Stop Belmont Casino

Floral Parkers Lead Grassroots Effort to Stop Belmont Casino
Written by Melissa Argueta

Residents initiate petition drive, letter-writing campaign to local and state officials

Is a plan to erect a casino at Belmont Park a safe bet or a bust? Droves of concerned Floral Parkers filed into the United Methodist Church at a Stop the Belmont Casino community meeting on Wednesday night to discuss this hot-button issue and how any future plans for a casino at the racetrack can be stopped.

How would a casino surrounding the communities of Elmont and Floral Park affect residents? Edwin Groshanz, Duncan MacDonald and Robert Moran are leading the grassroots-style campaign against the casino being built at Belmont. At the meeting, they provided facts and figures about how casinos can negatively impact the surrounding areas and how residents can join together to vocalize their opposition to local, state and federal politicians.

This fall, Detroit developers rolled out preliminary renderings for a casino at Belmont to residents in the Elmont community on behalf of the Shinnecock Indian Nation. However, all propositions came to a screeching halt after Governor Cuomo’s recent State of the State Address, where he touted his own plans for legalizing gambling in New York State and building the nation’s largest convention center and casino at Aqueduct Racetrack.


Groshanz said the group began with a team of three Floral Park residents. They held their first meeting in December and have already developed a website and created a facebook page.

“We’re making decent progress and we’ve had some very nice wins in a very short time that are good for us, but I think the focus on tonight is that we don’t want to rest. We don’t want to watch and listen to what we’re seeing in the paper and take that as truth,” he explained.

Announcing plans for a petition drive and letter-writing campaign, Groshanz explained how residents can contact state and federal legislators opposing the casino. “By doing these simple steps, we’ll wind up getting, hopefully, several thousand letters to all legislators at all levels of our government...on top of that we’ll get a groundswell of community groups in support of us and we’ll get media attention,” he added.

During the evening, Groshanz cited various studies on the subject of casinos in communities. He explained that his view of casinos is not his opinion, but derived from the statistics and studies on communities where casinos open. Specifically, he noted increased crime, traffic and pollution and decreased property values. “I think the only way we can prevent those ills, crime, resource utilization, adolescent gambling, is to make it loud and clear to our legislators that we don’t want it. It’s unacceptable and it’s not part of our life and we don’t want it coming into our community,” he said.

Groshanz maintained that despite Govenor Cuomo’s recent announcement to build a casino at Aqueduct Racetrack, there is no guarantee Belmont won’t be considered in the future as a casino site.

“For three years, people in Mineola and people in Albany have not been looking out for our best interests. We can’t afford to rest; the time for action is now; and the time to strike is when the iron is hot and we got this iron hot a month ago and we can’t sit back and rest,” he said.

Duncan McDonald emphasized that Aqueduct could fail for many reasons such as environmental regulations. “Legislation is the key thing…the whole game is the bill in Albany. It’s not the [Shinnecock] Indian Nation. It’s what the state permits. In the worst case, it could be that gambling casinos could be anywhere they want — Flatbush Avenue in Brooklyn or inside the lobby of St. Patrick’s Cathedral,” he said.

While the Stop the Belmont Casino meeting is not affiliated in any way with the Village of Floral Park, Groshanz asked concerned citizens to attend the next board of trustees meeting at Village Hall on Tuesday, Jan. 17. The group intends to ask for the village’s help in obtaining a handicapped accessible room and various other administrative needs. “We’d like the village to support the things that we’re doing,” he added.

While Mayor Tom Tweedy did not attend the meeting, he has stated the village’s position against the casino in this week’s Mayor’s Message. Trustee Jim Rhatigan was in attendance and informed residents that in the summer 2007, under the auspices of then Mayor Phil Guarnieri, the village established an Ad-Hoc Committee called the Taskforce for Belmont’s Preservation and Improvement. They created a Statement of Principles to address 10 concerns regarding the development of Belmont Racetrack. “That statement of principles is still available on the village’s website,” he said.

Rhatigan encouraged residents to attend the next village board meeting to discuss the issue further. “We welcome as much participation in local government as possible; fill the hall. We will note all your comments and take heed of your comments,” he added.

To learn more about this effort or to be added to the email list, visit
stopthebelmontcasino.org; or via facebook at Stop the Belmont Casino.

Friday, October 7, 2011

Genting in New York State

Questionable Malaysian Gambling Co trying to buy changes in our NYS Constitution; “Genting” Islamic extremists in Malaysia; the unresolved Aqueduct Scandal; NY Lobbying still run amok, Democrat power-broker officials complicit; and Taxpayer dollars financing public pensions for private lobbying

by ccrofny

Genting Casino In Florida (need to know background)
By Roger Stone
The Asian Gambling giant Genting stunned South Florida when they plunked down $263M for a choice piece of real estate owned by the Miami Herald Corporation on the assumption that Casino Gambling will be legalized in the Sunshine State in 2012 or 2013. One should not assume that Genting can be licensed if Florida adopts a vigorous Casino regulatory scheme.

Genting has financed two mega-billion dollar Native American Indian Casino deals in the US and violated Federal Indian law in both by taking usury interest rate payments from Tribes. In New York, Genting “bought” a contract to operate a casino at Aqueduct for an up-front payment of $250 million when the previous bidder got eliminated over public exposure of an illegal cabal involving the Governor and Senate Democrat Power-brokers to steer the contract to the favored vendor. New York conducted no due diligence as to the character or fitness of Genting. Genting’s other casino properties are all outside the US. The company has never gotten a casino operators license in the United States.

In fact, Genting and it’s inscrutable CEO KT Lim have made huge transfers to Islamic extremists in Malaysia. Sen. John McCain’s staff is well aware of Genting’s warts, having examined the Asian casino giant’s relationship with Indian tribes in Connecticut and New York.

TIMES UNION: Lobby dollars and a dream. Genting, remaking Aqueduct, spends freely on lobbyists in bid to change constitution. Genting, the Malaysian resorts and gambling company, envisions itself becoming rich in North America by changing the New York state constitution. The international gaming powerhouse, little-known in the United States, is planning to operate a Las Vegas-style casino at Aqueduct Racetrack, which is banned by the state constitution. Full story

Lobby dollars and a dream
Genting, remaking Aqueduct, spends freely on lobbyists in bid to change NYS Constitution
By JAMES M. ODATO Capitol bureau, Monday, June 27, 2011
ALBANY — Genting, the Malaysian resorts and gambling company, envisions itself becoming rich in North America by changing the New York state constitution.

The international gaming powerhouse, little-known in the United States, is planning to operate a Las Vegas-style casino at Aqueduct Racetrack, which is banned by the state constitution.

But Genting is spending about $1 million a year with lobbyists in Albany to make its dream of the Queens project a reality by amending the constitution.

Genting looks at the 5,000-machine video lottery terminal emporium it is building in South Ozone Park near JFK International Airport as a U.S. beachhead for much bigger things, according to numerous interviews with people in the gambling industry.

The Aqueduct project is named Resorts World Casino New York, even though it is a racino, only able to operate video lottery terminals (VLTs), which Genting executive “Colin” Fook Yew Au admitted last week aren’t as good as actual slot machines. “They’re not much better than VLTs, but still better,” Au told the state Franchise Oversight Board in a spirited appeal in which he argued against off-reservation tribal casino expansion and revealed a desire to build a convention center and hotel at Aqueduct.

Au did not discuss the big-picture plan of changing the state constitution, but a spokesman said Genting’s agenda includes “looking at a range of ways to further develop the Aqueduct site — a new convention center is one possible concept — to create more jobs and generate additional economic revenue for New York state.”

“We also firmly believe that racetrack casinos should be allowed to become fully commercial casinos,” the spokesman, Stefan Friedman, said. “Neither of these goals is easy to achieve, and we want to give ourselves the best chance of success.”

To that end, Genting, working with the newly formed New York Gaming Association, a coalition of VLT operators, is beginning to flex its considerable muscle in Albany to win a constitutional amendment that would allow racinos to convert to full-blown casinos, according to numerous interviews in recent weeks. Although the public disclosures on its lobbying forms don’t declare specifically what they’re up to, Genting has slowly built up a stable of influential lobbyists, paying one an extraordinary $35,000 a month in a town in which $10,000 is closer to the norm.

Four firms; former Senate GOP lawyer John Cordo, former Assembly Democrat communications director Patricia Lynch, veteran Queens lobbyist Brian Meara and former Republican Sen. Nicholas Spano are splitting more than $1 million in fees. They are walking the halls of the Capitol representing Genting’s interests, even though the Asian company has no legislation pending.

It’s all about building toward a positive vote early next year on a legislative resolution to change the constitution. A second passage of the resolution in the Legislature would have to follow in 2013 to put the proposition before voters in the November 2013 election, said James Featherstonhaugh, president of the New York Gaming Association, which represents all nine racino operators. Featherstonhaugh, a veteran lobbyist with a stake in the Saratoga harness track and VLT operation, said Genting is building a lobbying team to help push the NYGA agenda.

“They’re staffing up to get NYGA’s constitutional amendment,” he said. Genting actually has two votes on the NYGA board because it also has the controlling interest in Monticello Raceway, which, like the other racinos, has its own lobbying team. Featherstonhaugh said his group’s agenda and campaign will become fine-tuned soon after this session when NYGA will install an executive director, Michael Wilton, who has been a lobbyist with Patricia Lynch and Associates. Featherstonhaugh said Genting is “very aggressive.”
Such characteristics were on display before the Franchise Oversight Board, where Au said the state cannot allow tribes to set up off-reservation casinos in the Catskills or in Nassau County if they want the Aqueduct racino to stay open.

“The threat from the Indians are many,” Au said. “They can stay at their reservations, they have their rights. You should not let them encroach in the main metropolitan areas.” Later he told a reporter that the Shinnecock, on Long Island, should not be so greedy to want to build a casino outside of their reservation while they could probably do $200 million in business with an casino on their current territory.

Roger Gros, publisher of Global Gaming Business, said Genting’s plan has always been to make New York City a world-class casino destination. “This was really just a stepping stone; they’ve been interested in getting in the United States for some time,” he said. “I think this has been their plan all along, that once they got in there they would lobby for table games and a hotel.”

Recently, Genting purchased the Miami Herald building and grounds — 14 acres for $230 million — with the intention of building another resort as lobbyists pursue a change of Florida law to allow non-Indian casinos. Genting employs three lobbying firms in Florida to promote their plan, spending what would likely be as much as $300,000 on an annual basis based on Times Union calculations of the value of contracts. Their project in Miami will give them a leg up on other casinos companies should the laws change, said Gros. “Lobbyists shouldn’t have that power,” complained Assemblywoman Aileen Gunther, D-Sullivan County, who sees Genting as working against her county’s goals of obtaining a tribal casino and its own convention center. “It’s not fair. Money talks.”

Genting, with $5 billion in cash reserves, paid New York $380 million for the rights to build and operate at Aqueduct, blowing away competitors bidding on the same 30-year contract. The sum was seen as not commensurate with the potential return because VLT operators have to give so much of their betting revenues to the Division of the Lottery for public education funding.

A constitutional amendment in New York is a risky bet, but perhaps the state’s mood is shifting, said the Rev. Duane R. Motley, founder and senior lobbyist for New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms, which opposes gambling. He said the state Senate has become more moderate since the last time it dealt with the notion of a constitutional change allowing casinos. “I think they might put it out there to the people, but the people of New York have a history of voting down constitutional amendments; very few pass,” he said.

Funded with an ample supply of cash from Genting, the coalition seeking the change will likely develop a slick marketing campaign with TV ads talking about how gambling dollars and the jobs they can bring are being lost to neighboring states. It will come at a time when Gov. Andrew Cuomo will be looking for ways to improve state revenues, an official with one of the participating lobbing firms said. Cordo, whose firm is hired for consulting and public relations services, was part of a team that promoted the $2.9 billion transportation bond act on the ballot six years ago which passed comfortably. He once worked for Featherstonhaugh, who has longstanding ties to the Cuomo family. An aide to Gov. Andrew Cuomo was unsure of the governor’s stand on a constitutional change.

12-month contracts:

Cordo and Company, $25,000 per month amended to $35,000 a month in Febrary, amended to $30,000 a month in June

Patricia Lynch and Associates, $25,000 per month, starting June

Meara, Avella, Dickinson, $20,000 a month

Empire Strategic Planning Inc. (Nicholas Spano), $10,000 per month



Pension scandal nets two top Albany lobbyists
By JIMMY VIELKIND Capitol bureau, Wednesday, December 8, 2010

ALBANY — With three weeks left in his tenure as attorney general, Gov.-elect Andrew Cuomo announced more settlements in his two-year investigation into the pay-to-play culture surrounding the state pension fund (aka the Hevesi scandal).

Patricia Lynch Associates, one of Albany’s most prominent lobbying firms, agreed to pay a $500,000 fine, while its founder, Patricia Lynch, agreed to a five-year ban on lobbying before the Office of the State Comptroller.

Neither Lynch nor her firm admitted to breaking any laws. Darren Dopp, a spokesman for and partner in the firm, said only, “We’re pleased to put the matter behind us.”

Lynch was a top aide to Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver. Silver, however, put distance between himself and Lynch in 2009 when Cuomo’s subpoenas of her firm were first reported.

Dopp on Wednesday refused to answer questions about how the ban and fine would affect PLA’s business. Federal officials filed a $580,000 lien against the firm in August. An analysis of 2009 data maintained by the Commission on Public Integrity, which oversees lobbying, showed PLA is the second-highest-grossing firm in the state, collecting over $8.4 million in annual fees.

Lobby firm faces tax lien
Records: Patricia Lynch Associates was behind on payroll taxes in 2009
By JIMMY VIELKIND Capitol bureau, Tuesday, August 31, 2010
ALBANY — One of the Capitol’s largest lobbying firms fell behind on its payroll taxes in 2009, court records show.

A lien was filed against Patricia Lynch Associates on Aug. 11, court records show, for $580,666 in unpaid federal payroll taxes. The firm is based around its eponymous principal, Patricia Lynch, a former top aide to Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver.

“There was an unexpected expense in the year 2009 and the matter is being resolved,” said Darren Dopp, a spokesman for the firm.

Lynch’s firm was reportedly among those subpoenaed by Attorney General Andrew Cuomo in April 2009 as part of an investigation into pay-to-play abuses at the state’s Common Retirement Fund under the stewardship of ex-Comptroller Alan Hevesi.

Asked whether the unexpected expenses were related to legal defense, Dopp said, “You wouldn’t be wrong to reach that conclusion.”

The lien comes at a time when the firm was expanding. It opened an office in Panama in 2008 and was paid $8,415,694 to lobby state officials in 2009, according to records kept by the Public Integrity Commission. It ranks second behind the firm of Wilson Elser.

Lynch, a former director of communications to Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, recently hired Dan Weiller, the speaker’s top spokesman.



You pay for it: Tax dollars help cover pensions for private lobbying
Taxpayer dollars help finance public pensions for private lobbying by governments of government A handful of nonprofit corporations, which for decades have carried the message of local municipalities and school districts to state lawmakers, have…
(such as Patricia Lynch Associates) more »

A must read backgrounder: Private work, public pension

NY continues to be a top state in need of lobbying reforms; Out of control – Lobbying was $213 million industry in 2010
It’s recession-proof, that’s for sure. Groups, companies and people spent over $213 million lobbying state government in 2010, crossing the $200 million threshold for the first time in history. There are around 20 million people in this…
(Patricia Lynch Associates, 2nd highest grossing lobbyist) more »


Joseph Spector – Jun 17, 2011

In a remarkable and brief exchange last night on the Senate floor, Sen. Greg Ball stood up as Senate Democrats raised questions about a tax abatement for a Long Island fire department that evolved into comments by Sen. Eric Adams, D-Brooklyn, about corruption.

Ball asked: “Just one quick question: What is the status of the investigation into the Aqueduct gaming scandal, the multi-billion-dollar bid rigging scheme?”

Jaws dropped, and then the outspoken Republican from Putnam County asked again:

“On the topic: the multi-billion-dollar- bid rigging scheme and the Aqueduct scandal that still is unresolved?. Just a quick status update on that because I see tonight that you’ve raised your interest in corruption.”

Ball was talking about the probe started last year involving some Senate Democrats from New York City over allegations that they steered a lucrative gaming contract for Aqueduct Race Track in Queens to a politically connected firm, Aqueduct Entertainment Group. Adams was named in the report last year by then-Inspector General Joseph Fisch.

Ball’s questions were quickly knocked down by Adams and Sen. Neil Breslin, D-Delmar, Albany County, who rose to say that “this discussion is not relevant.”

On a related note, just so you know:


Document drop: NYRA 2010, ’11 budgets
Posted on July 16, 2011 at 1:22 am by Casey Seiler, Capitol bureau chief

At long last, here are the New York Racing Association’s budget documents for 2010 and 2011 (the latter revised to reflect the demise of NYCOTB). The association announced earlier this week that it was dropping its lawsuit against the state Budget Division to block the release of the budgets, which NYRA claimed revealed proprietary information — but you can read that on every page of the 2011 packet.

Some topline numbers:

The 2011 budget, which was revised to reflect changes stemming from the closing of the New York City Off-Track Betting operation in December, showed that NYRA’s overall operating expenses are budgeted to rise 7.9 percent or $10.4 million in 2011.
Net revenue, however, is budgeted to drop 3.9 percent compared to 2010 — from $152 million to $146 million. The end result, the budget states, is a net loss of $11.6 million. According to its 2010 figures, NYRA lost almost $15 million.
NYRA’s salaries and wages are predicted to increase 5.2 percent, or $2.9 million.
One of the biggest drivers in the association’s personnel costs is a 27 percent increase in employee-related benefits (to $19.1 million) largely due to increases in NYRA-administered health plans.
The 2010 budget and the revised 2011 documents can be read here:

And this really makes you wonder, as it is related here, or in many other areas. 6 months in office and already raised (or being paid off?) $6 million!
Cuomo’s filing: $9.2 m on hand
Posted on July 15, 2011 at 1:54 pm by Rick Karlin, Capitol bureau
It’s campaign filing day and here is the filing from the Cuomo campaign:

Opening Balance: $4,176,120.01

Total Receipts: $6,220,328.49

Total Expenses: $1,173,188.49

Total On Hand (End of Period): $9,223,260.01