Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Senator Pacheco. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Senator Pacheco. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Casino Shill Resigns! Says 'Why's everybody always picking on me?'

What just one minute!

Clyde has a lengthy and somewhat curious history.

 


Clyde did a cable segment of 'Commonwealth Journal' with Senator Pacheco, during which he swore 'independence, no connection to the industry...' blah, blah, blah. [Always curious that his footnotes credited other Casino Shills.]

I video taped that segment and suppose I need to wade through the dust to determine the date....

It happened to be AFTER Ryan Adams had posted links of Clyde's 'consulting firm' at Clyde's home address to MAINE. [Must have been the aliens!]


Clyde threatened to sue...never defining the 'pseudo blogs' he intended to target.

I sent Ryan's links to Maine to Senator Pacheco who responded 'Not so.'

Clyde is a minor sleaze, of little importance and credible journalists don't quote him.




Clyde used to count license plates at out-of-state Slot Barns.

Now who's gonna do it?


As a curious side note, Clyde did a polling on the Brockton Power Plant that was widely criticized for its failures. Clyde threatened to sue. [Maybe still archived by Brockton Enterprise....if anyone cares.]

The bottom line is: Don't believe an 'expert'!



Previously posted:
Clyde Barrow: Duh?
Casino Shill Barrow Exposed -- Again! #2
Casino Shill Barrow Exposed -- Again!
Some Facts


 
 
DARTMOUTH — "Why are so many of the institution's most successful faculty all deciding to leave at the same time?"
 
That's what UMass Dartmouth professor Clyde Barrow asks in a public resignation statement titled "The Book of Exodus" that he submitted to the provost Monday.
 
After 27 years at the university, the prominent director of the Center for Policy Analysis said he will retire effective July 31, joining "several others" who he alleges have left in recent months having "grown tired of Chancellor Divina Grossman's habitually abusive treatment."
 
University spokesman John Hoey denied the allegations and said Barrow's statement is riddled with "factual inaccuracies and misleading statements."
 
"I am known for telling the truth, and my colleagues will back me up," Barrow said.
 
"He is well known on campus for embellishing criticism of the administration and his fellow faculty members," Hoey said.
 
Hoey said he is not sure if it is a coincidence that Barrow's angst comes at a time when the administration has been asking "hard questions" about the financials regarding his center and "his relationship to his consultancy firm."
 
Barrow, whose salary is $185,000, said there have been no questions raised that he knows of. He said he has a signed letter of authorization from the UMass General Counsel's Office "authorizing my consulting activities as not being in conflict with my directorship of the Center for Policy Analysis" and that he has regularly filed quarterly conflict-of-interest statements with the provost's office since 2006 "and no one has ever raised a single question."
 
"This is exactly the problem. Rather than dealing with issues directly, they turn everything into a personal attack," he said. "These types of unwarranted and malicious attacks on faculty are exactly why people are leaving the campus in such large numbers."
 
Bal Ram Singh, biochemistry professor and director of the Indic Center at UMass Dartmouth whose multimillion dollar Botulinum Research Center was shut down by the administration, said Barrow's departure will be a loss.
 
"It's very sad. He's a very prominent scholar and an internationally known figure who has done a lot of important work in this community. I don't think there'll be much left of the Center for Policy Analysis when he leaves," Singh said.
 
Barrow pointed to several faculty members who he said have "been pushed out" in recent months.
 
They include former director of the Center for Portuguese Studies and Culture Frank Sousa, who is now at UMass Lowell; Susan Jennings, who quit last fall after her office of sustainability studies was dissolved; former management professor Susanne Scott, who is now associate dean of the School of Business at Brooklyn College, City University of New York; former chair of the Teaching and Learning Department Joao Rosa, who is now at Bridgewater State; and Karen O'Connor, director of the center for University School Community Partnerships, who Barrow said is retiring soon.
 
"It is important to mention that no one is leaving UMass Dartmouth because of last year's tragedy," Barrow said in the letter, referring to the Boston Marathon bombings. "Instead, the real underlying problem at UMass Dartmouth continues to be an administrative crisis that is getting worse as senior administrators literally isolate themselves from the campus behind multiple walls of glass, key code security systems, and body guards."
 
The "most egregious" of Barrow's statement include allegations of a safe house and bulletproof glass for senior administration that Hoey said are not true. However, the university did provide about $7,200 in security upgrades like key card access to the administrative building, that includes the chancellor's office, which is "fairly common," he said.
 
Lester Cory, director of Center for Rehabilitation Research, who Barrow said in his letter "retired due to a lack of campus support," denied it. He said he retired five years ago because it was time but remains director of the center he founded.
 
"The administration had no role to play in my retirement," Cory said. "I think the university has been very supportive of the work we are doing."
 
Cory also said he is aware of "a couple of disgruntled center directors" but thinks the university has hired "some very good people" in recent years and is "making progress."
 
Grant O'Rielly, faculty senate president and physics professor, said people are leaving due to retirement or advancement in their careers. There will be more people retiring in the future due to demographics, he said.
 
"It is true that there are a number of senior faculty leaving the university this year, possibly more than in an average year, but this is not that unusual in any large organization," he said. "Others (like Professor Barrow) may well be disillusioned, it is certainly true that some groups saw their level of support change under Chancellor Grossman compared with what they got from Chancellor MacCormack."
 
This is an opportunity for the university to hire new, young faculty to replace its outgoing senior members, O'Rielly said.
 
"If we don't see this happen, then I would be worried that the departure of so many senior faculty does indeed not bode well for the future of the institution," he said.
 
Hoey was unable to immediately provide a number for how many faculty members have left in the past year but said that many of them either retired or moved to better opportunities as is "the nature of the higher education market." He said the university continues to look to hire qualified people "committed to transformative teaching, research and community engagement."
 
This is not the first time the UMass Dartmouth administration and faculty have butted heads.
Last year, faculty members called for increased dialogue at one of several faculty and student panels organized. Many called the administration "deaf to their concerns" and "several placed the blame on faculty members themselves or called for changes to the university's bureaucratic management structure," according to an article in The Standard-Times on April 30, 2013.

Correction

This story was modified on Tuesday, April 22, 2014, to reflect the following:
Lester Cory's name was incorrect in an article in The Standard-Times on Monday. Clyde Barrow's last name was incorrect on two occasions in the same article.
 
 
 

Text of Clyde Barrow's resignation statement

The Book of Exodus (from UMass Dartmouth): and an open letter of resignation
 
Almost one year ago, the Boston Herald (05-06-2013) published an excellent and insightful editorial documenting how the Dzhokhar Tsarnaev terrorist incident at UMass Dartmouth opened a window onto the entrenched “moral bankruptcy” of our senior administration. Unfortunately, the only thing that has changed since Rachelle Cohen's brutally truthful editorial is that UMass Dartmouth has continued sinking deeper into organizational and programmatic chaos, and each day ushers in a new reminder of the institution's disintegration and decay. Consequently, I will be resigning (actually retiring) from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, effective July 31, 2014, to accept a new faculty position as department chair at a doctoral-granting research university in a sunbelt state that is dedicated to conducting “applied research to address critical local, state, national, and global needs.”
During my 27 years at UMass Dartmouth, I have twice chaired the department of political science, founded a department of public policy, and reestablished the Center for Policy Analysis as a resource for state and local governments, school departments, non-profit organizations, labor unions, and private businesses. I have served as President and Treasurer of the UMass Faculty Federation, Director of the Master of Public Policy Program, and chaired the national Caucus for a New Political Science. However, like so many other senior faculty at UMass Dartmouth, I have decided to exit the campus, despite profound misgivings about leaving friends and colleagues that I have known for many years. In addition, I have had the opportunity to work in partnership with people in virtually every city and town in Massachusetts and I learned a great deal from every one of those individuals. I look forward to continuing those constructive partnerships as I will be maintaining an active presence in New England through Pyramid Associates, LLC, a private consulting firm which I founded in 2006.
 
Over the past several months, I interviewed for nearly 20 jobs at universities in nine states from coast to coast. One of the first questions posed to me in each interview was: “Why would you leave UMass Dartmouth at this stage of your career?” My answer was that “the real question is not why am I leaving UMass Dartmouth, but why are so many of the institution's most successful faculty all deciding to leave at the same time?”
 
And that list gets longer every day.
 
It includes the former co-director of the Massachusetts Marine Fisheries Institute, who despite being a world renowned fisheries expert who brought millions of dollars in federal dollars to UMass Dartmouth, finally retired in frustration with the current administration. It includes the former director of the Center for Portuguese Studies, who raised millions of dollars in endowments, helped established a new department, and founded a Portuguese-American archive. He left to take charge of a new million dollar center focusing on the same subject at UMass Lowell. The former director of the Center for Botulinum Research and the Indic Center has taken a sabbatical and will retire to pursue his internationally recognized research through an independent non-profit organization. A former professor of management and associate dean of the Charlton College of Business left to become an associate dean at Brooklyn College. The former director of the Center for Rehabilitation Research, which has generated millions of dollars to support the development of custom designed technology to assist the physically challenged, has retired due to a lack of campus support. The director of the Kaput Center for Innovation in STEM Education is leaving to become a dean of education at Southern Connecticut State University. The former chair of the now defunct Department of Teaching & Learning left to accept a position as the director of a multi-million dollar research center at Bridgewater State University. The founder and director of UMass (Dartmouth) Lisbon left to accept an executive position at the multi-billion Luso-American Foundation. After generating more than $10 million in grants to support K-12 teacher training, the director of the Center for University and School Partnerships (CUSP) is retiring to pursue other career alternatives because of the administration's “ambiguous” responses to proposals for future development.
 
This is not the entire list of refugees, which also includes many promising but discouraged junior faculty who left as soon as it became evident that the new administration was dismantling UMD from the inside, and more by ineptitude than by design. And I should not forget the exodus of numerous and talented professional staff, who have simply grown tired of Chancellor Divina Grossman's habitually abusive treatment. This will not be the end of the exodus, because once marketable faculty and professional staff accept the reality that their friends and colleagues have actually left, it will set off a second wave of departures next year. Meanwhile, Provost Mohammad Karim, ostensibly the university's chief academic officer, has responded to this intellectual meltdown with practiced indifference.
 
It is important to mention that no one is leaving UMass Dartmouth because of last year's tragedy.
 
Instead, the real underlying problem at UMass Dartmouth continues to be an administrative crisis that is getting worse as senior administrators literally isolate themselves from the campus behind multiple walls of glass, key code security systems, and body guards.
 
Yet, hiding from the truth does not change the fact that the individuals who are leaving UMD account for millions of dollars in grants, fundraising, and public service contracts, as well as hundreds of scholarly publications, and thousands of media mentions that will no longer carry the UMD imprimatur. Further, each of these individuals carries a story into the wider world of academia that will be retold in scholarly articles, discussed at professional conferences, passed around in emails and social media, and become part of the global academic grape vine that will impact UMD's future funding and academic reputation.
 
More people -- from the UMass Board of Trustees, to constitutional officers and state legislators, to a media that should expect more from a state university system that singularly belies our reputation as the world's center of educational excellence -- need to start asking what's wrong with UMass Dartmouth? And UMass President Robert Caret has an obligation to step forward and accept responsibility for this academic disaster.
 
Clyde W. Barrow is [WAS] the Director of the Center for Policy Analysis at UMass Dartmouth.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Tribe's casino compact advances



Tribe's casino compact advances
 
SPRINGFIELD — A legislative committee on Tuesday approved a casino compact between the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and Gov. Deval Patrick, setting the stage for the state's full House and Senate to consider the deal.
 
After a hearing on a dozen unrelated bills at Western New England University's School of Law, the Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies voted 8-1 in favor of moving the compact forward.
 
Tuesday's vote marks the first time in four months that there's been movement in the tribe's plans to build a $500 million casino in Taunton.
 
"We thank the committee members for supporting this revised compact, which brings us another step closer to breaking ground on Project First Light," tribal council Chairman Cedric Cromwell said.
 
Only state Rep. Robert Koczera, D-New Bedford, voted against it.
 
"If we approve this, it's unnecessary because it's inoperable," Koczera said during the brief discussion of the compact legislation.
 
Koczera cited a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, known as the Carcieri decision, that calls into question the federal Department of the Interior's ability to take land into trust for tribes recognized after 1934.
 
The Mashpee tribe gained federal recognition in 2007.
 
"The Supreme Court decision effectively puts up a roadblock," he said.
 
The tribe has filed paperwork with the federal government showing why it believes the high court ruling does not apply. The tribe argued that it was under federal jurisdiction in 1934.
 
That position has been challenged by casino critics, and the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs has yet to rule on that key question, despite issuing a letter to the tribe earlier this year saying a decision would be coming by "early 2013."
 
After the hearing, Koczera said he's fearful that the committee's vote will be seen as a positive movement by the Legislature and potentially hurt prospects for commercial casino companies to consider applying for a license in Southeastern Massachusetts, known as Region C in the casino legislation.
 
"I think it tends to dampen investors wanting to go into the area somewhat, but we'll see how that plays out," he said.
 
As he has said previously, Koczera said he is worried about his city losing out on jobs and revenue a casino could bring.
 
"I don't see how tribal gaming by any measure of reasonableness can expect to be up and running in the same time as a commercial casino, and they were given a head start," he said.
 
The Massachusetts Gaming Commission opened up the region to commercial bids and set a deadline of Sept. 30 for the initial phase of applications, plus a $400,000 nonrefundable check.
 
To date, only KG Urban Enterprises, a company that wants to build a casino on the New Bedford waterfront, has announced its intentions to apply.
 
Andrew Stern, managing director of KG Urban, which sued the state over the tribe's head start in Region C, also noted that if a commercial casino is licensed and the tribe clears its hurdles, the Mashpee Wampanoag won't have to pay the state anything under the terms of the compact.
 
"The governor has placed the interests of one group ahead of the interests of the rest of southeast Massachusetts men and women," he said. "That's just wrong. We hope sincerely that the Legislature is wiser than the governor on this issue and does not approve the compact."
 
The Patrick administration declined comment on the committee vote through spokeswoman Emily Fitzmaurice.
 
State Rep. Antonio Cabral, D-New Bedford, who was in the audience Tuesday, said after the vote that he's hopeful the Gaming Commission will press forward with the commercial process.
 
"I believe a commercial license will be issued in Region C before the tribe can get going," Cabral said. "I'm not opposed to a tribal casino, but it should not be exclusive to a commercial casino. One of the dangers is we are left without the ability to compete on a level playing field with the other two regions."
 
In its press release, the Mashpee Wampanoag predicted the compact will provide $2.1 billion in revenue to the state over 20 years. The compact will also provide $300 million to Southeastern Massachusetts for transportation, education, tourism and funding for surrounding communities, according to the tribe.
 
"We live here, we work here, we want to grow here, and we will reinvest here," Cromwell said. "We are the hometown team."
 
The committee held off on voting on the compact for months. The bill was filed in April by Patrick and the committee held its public hearing in mid-May, but delayed the vote.
 
"Although it took longer than anticipated, it's good to see this agreement be reported out of committee with overwhelming support, which is also a hopeful sign for the future of gaming in Southeastern Massachusetts," state Sen. Marc Pacheco, D-Taunton, said.
 
In April, the Gaming Commission moved ahead with plans to seek commercial bids in the region, in part, because it could not predict how long the tribal process would take.
 
The compact, which was renegotiated after an initial compact was rejected by the Bureau of Indian Affairs last October, will now go to the full House where it faces an up or down vote. The Legislature is not allowed to amend the terms of the deal between the tribe and Patrick.
 
Seth Gitell, a spokesman for House Speaker Robert DeLeo, could not immediately say when the House will schedule a compact vote.
 
After the House considers it, the compact will move on to the Senate.
 
Under the proposal, the tribe would pay the state anywhere from zero to 21 percent of gross gambling revenue based on the level of competition. If the state has two other casinos and a slot parlor outside the region, the tribe would pay 17 percent.
 
That could make it a tough sell in the House and Senate, because the first deal they approved would have paid the state 21.5 percent of gross gambling revenue, no matter the level of competition in Region C.
 
That deal was rejected as being too lucrative to the state with not enough concessions for the tribe.
Even if the Legislature approves the compact, the bureau will have 45 days to consider if the new deal protects the tribe's financial interests.
 
 
 

Thursday, June 13, 2013

KoolAid Consumption in Raynham



Officials: Raynham covered by host community agreement

By Marc Larocque
Posted Jun 12, 2013


JosephPachecoRichardSchiavoMarieSmith

Raynham Board of Selectmen, from left, JosephPacheco, RichardSchiavo and MarieSmith



Elected leaders in Raynham said that the host community agreement they reached on a proposed 1,250 slot machine gaming facility will mitigate all impacts on the town related to the development project.

The town’s consultant for the project has determined that major infrastructure improvements to the town’s water and sewer system are not required for the first two phases of development planned for the Raynham Park slot project.

But if and when further phases of development come to be, including plans for a hotel along with retail stores and restaurants at the 125-acre site on Broadway, the host community agreement covers it, said Raynham Board of Selectmen Chairman Joseph Pacheco.

“They recognized impacts that are going to be put on this community as a result of this,” Pacheco said on Wednesday. “At the end of the day, we came away with an agreement that is good for Raynham and operating a business as well. There is a whole separate section in the agreement about infrastructure improvements. Those costs will be exclusively bore by Raynham Park.”

On Tuesday night, the three-member Raynham Board of Selectmen approved a host community agreement that would provide the town $1.1 million annually, in addition to property taxes, permitting costs and other fees that the developers must pay the town on the proposed 175,000-square-foot gaming facility they plan to construct. Raynham Park, which was a dog track for nearly 70 years and has been holding simulcast racing since greyhound racing was banned in 2008, must invest at least $125 million according to the Massachusetts gaming legislation.

“The negotiation obviously had its challenges,” Pacheco said. “Their top priority is operating a business, obviously. I do have to give them credit. They recognized impacts that are going to be put on this community as a result of that. At the end of the day, we came away with an agreement that good for Raynham and operating a business as well.”

The community host agreement has not yet been released to the public, but the Selectmen said on Tuesday night that they would be releasing the 13-page document within seven days. A town-wide referendum vote is expected to take place in mid-August, but should be announced in the following days, Pacheco said.

When it comes to covering a potential influx of police or ambulance calls, Pacheco said that Raynham Park would not be the only business generating calls for service in the area.


Also, the issue is complicated by the fact that a plan to police the slot casino, which may involve the State Police, has not yet been formed at this point, according to a consultant hired by the town.
“We’re getting over a million dollars a year to handle impacts and so forth,” Pacheco said. “The board, at our discretion, is going to make decisions if there is an appropriate need for (police and fire) staffing. … There will be some increase in calls for service. But nobody should just make the presumption the calls will just be for Raynham Park. We have other businesses in the town of Raynham.”

Conor Yunits, a spokesperson for Raynham Park and its owner George Carney, said that the developers are in the process of finalizing all the renderings of redevelopment at the Route 138 site, located just off of Interstate 495 and not far from Route 24. Yunits said that Raynham Park, along with its partner Greenwood Racing/Parx, of Pennsylvania, has a tentative plan to release the renderings, and more economic information surrounding the proposed slot casino project, next month.

“We’re in the process of finalizing all the renderings,” Yunits said. “Also there is all the economic data, the jobs numbers and everything else. We expect to have it all completed in the next two weeks.”

Yunits said that following the tentative announcement set for July, Raynham Park plans to follow it up with a series of community meetings at Raynham Park “so people can come ask questions and learn more” prior to the town wide referendum.

Yunits said a website, dedicated to information about the project, is set to launch by the end of June.

“We are trying to get it done as soon as possible,” he said. “We want to make as much info available to the public as soon as possible.”

What is known right now about the economic impact of the project is that B&S Consulting, which was hired by the town to analyze the proposed slot casino, has said the Raynham Park slot parlor would generation between 411 and 500 new jobs. The firm’s figure is lower than the initial estimate of 600 put forth by the developers. [Experience elsewhere indicates the ratio is 3-4 SLOT MACHINES per Employee, not specifying shifts, part-time workers. These are LOW WAGE JOBS.]


Raynham Park and town officials said that after three years, the annual $1.1 million payment to the town will increase by 2.5 percent for each following year. Out of the $1.1 million, $100,000 of that will go toward capital costs for the town, which would pay for things like police cars and dump trucks, even after three years as the formula for host community compensation changes.

Another detail of the agreement is that that the 2.5 percent yearly increases to the $1.1 million payment would be subject to a “1 percent gross gaming revenue cap” after 20 years of operations.

In addition to the $1.1 million, during the second year and beyond, the agreement calls for $15,000 to be contributed by Raynham Park each year to a fund that will provide payments to local businesses that apply for façade improvements on the Route 138 corridor. The Raynham Park developers also agreed to conduct a traffic impact study at the junction of Old North Main and Elm streets, along with perfuming additional traffic, water and sewer studies as recommended by the town’s planning consultant for the project.

State Rep. Angelo D’Emilia, R-Bridgewater, said he believes the agreement is good for Raynham.
“I think the Carney family has proven in the past they can run that kind of establishment and if the community agrees moving forward, it’d be a great thing getting jobs back to Raynham,” D’Emilia said.

State Sen. Marc Pacheco, D-Taunton, said the agreement sounds good, but the issue is for Raynham to decide.

“From a state perspective, we’re certainly interested in these licenses,” said Pacheco, noting that the gaming legislation calls for a 40 percent tax on the holder of the slot license, which will be awarded later this year or early 2014.

Joseph Pacheco said he believes that public opinion in Raynham is positive about the proposed gaming facility, partly because of Raynham Park’s history in Raynham and how it has employed many residents over the years.

“There has always been deep support in Raynham for Raynham Park,” Pacheco said.
[Not from the Raynham residents I've spoken to!]


http://www.tauntongazette.com/newsnow/x1484773708/Officials-Raynham-covered-by-host-community-agreement?zc_p=0#axzz2W6PigrLu



Norton officials wary of gambling impact

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Genting/Wampanoag Compact: A Dazzling Display of Propaganda and Misinformation

 
 


Let's not forget that this location bears the greatest infrastructure costs.
 
 
Legislators wary of new compact with Mashpee tribe
 
BOSTON — Legislators deciding whether a gaming compact goes before the full House and Senate were worried Wednesday about how much it cost when the first agreement between the Mashpee Wampanoag and the governor was rejected by the federal government.
 
"We swung and missed in a pretty big way the last time around," state Rep. Joseph Wagner, D-Chicopee, co-chairman of the Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies, said about the first compact being rejected by the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs.

During a hearing that spanned more than five hours before a packed room at the Statehouse, the committee heard from Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe leaders, a handful of representatives and senators, a company that hopes to compete for the region's gambling dollars, and representatives of Gov. Deval Patrick.
 
The committee took no action on the new compact, but Wagner indicated that members will move it forward for consideration by the Legislature. The committee will take it up during an as-yet-unscheduled executive session.
 
The federal bureau determined that the first compact was unfair because the tribe would have paid the state 21.5 percent of gross gambling revenue without enough concessions. It also found that the state and tribe overreached in attempting to settle items not related to Indian gaming, including hunting and fishing rights and land issues.
 
Under the new compact, the state would receive anywhere from zero to 21 percent in gross gambling revenue depending on the extent of competition.
 
During testimony, Wagner asked for a full accounting of how much the two compacts cost the state to negotiate and even urged Patrick's office to seek a refund from the state's legal advisers.
 
He pointed out that the federal rejection included 18 pages of detailed problems with the first agreement.
 
"It was pretty strong in terms of the number of ways we didn't hit the nail on the head," he said.
The Expanded Gaming Act authorized $5 million to be spent in hiring legal consultants for the governor's office.
 
Brendan Ryan, Patrick's chief of staff, said not all of that money has been spent, though he added that a significant portion was used to negotiate the two compacts.
 
If the compact is approved by the Legislature, the bureau has 45 days to approve or reject it.
 
Tribal council Chairman Cedric Cromwell said after testifying that he's optimistic the committee, and ultimately the Legislature, will approve it.
 
"There are $2.5 billion in reasons why the compact should be taken up and approved," he said, referring to the estimated revenue the state will get during the 20 years of the compact.
 
Both Ryan and Cromwell testified that the bureau provided technical assistance in answering concerns raised with the first compact and tried to ease fears that the second agreement wouldn't hold.
 
The assistance included a meeting with Kevin Washburn, assistant secretary of the bureau, and his staff in Washington, D.C.
 
A steady stream of legislators, including two from the Cape, testified Wednesday, most of them supportive of the compact and the tribe's efforts to build a $500 million casino in Taunton.
 
Sen. Daniel Wolf, D-Harwich, steered clear of the particulars of the compact and said this was an opportunity for the Legislature to right a historic wrong in how Indian tribes were treated.
 
"Many people think history started when the Mayflower landed in Provincetown," Wolf said. "This is an opportunity to revisit that history, to correct that history, to rewrite that history in a way I think we can all be proud of."
 
Rep. Sarah Peake, D-Provincetown, who, like Wolf, voted against legalizing casinos, said she supports the tribe's proposal for Southeastern Massachusetts and the "multiplier effect" it could have on tourism in the region.
 
Rep. Robert Koczera, D-New Bedford, a member of the joint committee, made the case that there is no urgency to approve a compact with the tribe, but Nick Martinelli, the governor's deputy general counsel, said it's important to act on the compact while the state and tribe's interests are aligned.
 
Other representatives from the southeast area of the state, as well as Marsha Sajer, an attorney for KG Urban Enterprises, a company that is competing with the tribe with a New Bedford casino, also cautioned against rushing.
 
"There is no obligation on the part of the commonwealth or any state to negotiate a compact absent land in trust," Sajer said.
 
Sajer and Andrew Stern, a principal for KG Urban, doubted the tribe would either get its land or a compact approved.
 
"Why would you care if we approve the compact or don't approve the compact?" state Sen. Gale Candaras, D-Wilbraham, the committee's co-chairman, said in response. "It's almost a nullity. Based on what you're saying, the vote of this committee and the vote of the Legislature is irrelevant."
 
Under the gaming law, commercial casinos would have to pay 25 percent of revenue to the state; meanwhile, under the compact, a tribal casino in the same region as a commercial casino would pay nothing.
 
"Having this compact approved with its zero revenue is going to have a chilling effect on my client to get financial backers," Sajer said.
 
Wagner attempted to keep the discussion on the compact and away from other federal hurdles faced by the tribe, including its application to have land in Taunton and Mashpee taken into federal trust as an initial reservation.
 
That proved fruitless as speakers repeatedly brought up a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, known as the Carcieri decision, that calls into question the ability of the Department of the Interior to take land in trust for tribes recognized after 1934.
 
The tribe has made the case that it was under federal jurisdiction in 1934, a distinction one of its Indian gaming lawyers, Arlinda Locklear, said would allow the bureau to take the land into trust and for a casino to be built. The tribe expects a decision soon.
 
"The final decision on a Carcieri analysis is measured in weeks, not years," Locklear said.
 
State Sen. Marc Pacheco, D-Taunton, urged the committee to move the renegotiated deal forward expeditiously. "I understand ... your concerns of making sure we don't get up again and swing again, but we can also hit a home run here," he said. "We can also get this done."

http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130516/NEWS/305160329/-1/NEWSLETTER100


Massachusetts lawmakers consider new Mashpee Wampanoag casino compact
By State House News Service
on May 15, 2013

By ANDY METZGER

BOSTON — A push for legislative approval of a gaming compact between the state and the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe ran into some wary lawmakers who questioned a previous compact’s rejection by the federal government and whether the current compact should be shelved until the casino approval process is further along.

The Mashpee face a few hurdles in their bid to build a 150,000 square-foot resort casino with 150 table games, 40 poker tables and 3,000 slots on an industrial park in Taunton. The first compact with the state was rejected by the Department of the Interior, and the federal government is still reviewing the necessary step of taking the Mashpee’s land into federal trust. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission has decided to open up the licensing process in southeastern Massachusetts to commercial casino developers along with the tribe, while the commission waits to see how the land-in-trust and gaming compact are resolved.

According to the tribe and its attorneys, the land-in-trust application is on its way towards clearing another stage in the approval process, and the new compact will likely receive approval as federal regulators have been apprised of the negotiations.

The second iteration of the gaming compact was met with some skepticism, however, as questions remain over whether the tribe will be able to receive all the necessary approvals.

“I think we can put it on a shelf,” said Rep. Robert Koczera (D-New Bedford) as the compact was up for a hearing before the Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies. He said, “We can take it up if the time comes when the land is taken into trust.”

“We swung and missed in a pretty big way the last time around,” House Chairman Joe Wagner (D-Chicopee) said, referring to the rejection of the last compact. He said it was his intention to “at some point sooner rather than later move forward this compact to a vote.” Wagner later said, “This committee is likely at a point going to move this compact forward.”

The last compact between the state and the tribe was the first of its kind that federal regulators had seen, said Brendan Ryan, chief of staff to Gov. Deval Patrick. Massachusetts is the first state to move ahead on tribal casinos and commercial casinos at the same time, Ryan told the committee, attempting to assuage concerns that the second compact would be rejected again.

“We’re as confident as can be that we addressed every concern,” said Ryan, who said the Bureau of Indian Affairs worked much more closely with the tribe and the state in the second go-around. He said, “I think it’s more likely to succeed because we got constructive feedback and addressed it.”

The November 2011 gaming law allowed for three casinos in three regions of the state and created a special process for an Indian tribe that was able to line up a vote in the host community and receive a legislatively approved gaming compact with the state by July 31, 2012, which the Mashpee accomplished.

Mashpee Chairman Cedric Cromwell told reporters the compact gives “a meaningful concession to our tribe – exclusivity” and said it is “so important to build a relationship.” The new compact creates a sliding scale for what the tribe would owe the state, ranging from 21 percent as long as it’s the only casino in the state to zero if another casino opens in the southeastern region.

If the federal government grants the tribe land in trust, the tribe will be able to put “a shovel in the ground,” regardless of any revenue-sharing agreement with the state, Cromwell said. He told the committee, “If our compact is not approved, the tribe’s going to move forward anyway.”

A tribal casino without revenue-sharing would provide fierce competition to any nearby commercial casino that would have to hand over a portion of profits to the state.

“You can’t compete with us,” Cromwell said.

KG Urban Enterprises, which wants to build a casino in the southeastern region, rehabbing a polluted former power plant along the New Bedford waterfront, has already spent $7 million on its potential venture, according to KG Managing Director Andrew Stern.

“All we’ve ever asked for is a level playing field,” Stern said. He said it was a “worthy endeavor” to attempt to clean up a “filthy” brownfield along the harbor.

KG Urban Enterprise’s gaming expert Marsha Sajer said if its reservation is approved, the Mashpee would need a compact to build a full-fledged casino, and could only go forward with a much smaller operation absent a compact.

“It simply is going to be a bingo hall or nothing more than a card room,” Sajer said. She also said that the Bureau of Indian Affairs closely reviews the environmental impacts of taking land into trust for gaming, and said it can be a six-year process.

“These are indigenous people to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,” said Senate Chairwoman Gale Candaras, who said the state would have to negotiate a compact with the tribe if it obtained land in trust. She said, “All they ever got from us was smallpox, and we treated them very poorly.”

The land-in-trust application is currently under a review to determine whether the Mashpee were federally recognized before 1934, according to the tribe’s attorney, Arlinda Locklear, who said the federal government had dealt with the tribe on multiple occasions over the years.

Locklear said that in the 1820s, as the U.S. secretary of war was removing tribes along the eastern seaboard, the federal government elected to allow the Mashpee to stay, and in the early 20th century about a dozen Mashpee students were sent off to an Indian school in Pennsylvania.

Locklear told the News Service that the land-in-trust will give the Mashpee a tribal reservation, and said final approval is “months, less than years” away from final approval. It is “weeks” from clearing the historic test, Locklear told the committee.

Mashpee Vice Chairwoman Jessie Baird said Taunton was an important place in the tribe’s history, as a tribal chief during King Philip’s War was captured by the English while crossing the Taunton River and her head was put on a pike in Taunton where it stayed for years.

“We have not forgotten our territory or who we are. And I will submit to you that water always seeks its source,” Baird told the committee in the middle of a roughly five-hour hearing.

Both Ryan and Mashpee attorney Howard Cooper said Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs Kevin Washburn, who rejected the last compact, seemed likely to approve the new compact if it reaches his desk.

“They could not give us pre-approval because no such thing exists,” Cooper said.

Rep. Keiko Orrall (R-Lakeville), who now represents the area of Taunton that includes the proposed site, said she thought the federal government would not approve the compact, because the Gaming Commission’s decision to open up the licensing process to commercial bidders removes the tribe’s exclusivity.

Rep. Antonio Cabral (D-New Bedford) said that the compact would allow the tribe to decide on a completely different site for a range of reasons, allowing it to build a casino as far away as Chatham.

Rep. Kevin Kuros (R-Uxbridge) said a potential compact would still be valuable to the tribe even if it received land in trust before a compact was approved.

“There’s value in exclusivity, and that value doesn’t go away the day that land gets taken into trust,” said Kuros.

http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/05/massachusetts_lawmakers_consid.html


Lawmakers hesitate on new Wampanoag compact

A tribal casino without revenue-sharing would provide fierce competition to any nearby commercial casino that would have to hand over a portion of profits to the state

Friday, April 19, 2013

Genting Wampanoag Food Fight Post Scripts



White man speak with forked tongue

Governments have been breaking promises made to the Wampanoag nation for the last 400 years.

Mashpee Wampanoag tribe loses exclusive rights for a Southeastern Massachusetts casino

If a commercial license is awarded and the tribe secures federally protected land in the future, the tribe could build a casino without state oversight or revenue sharing

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Senator Pacheco, How disappointing!

Senator Pacheco NOW says Predatory Gambling is about JOBS - ignoring that they're LOW WAGE JOBS. ignoring that each Slot Machine permanently removes +1 job from the LOCAL ECONOMY.

That's not what he said in the past.

Remember when he said his donor, George Carney needed Slots to survive?
Remember when the Senator submitted bill after bill after bill after bill to the budget to put add SLOTS anywhere and everywhere? Last one was the AIRPORT.

How do SLOT MACHINES at the airport create JOBS?
[If the Senator had done his homework, he would have known that SLOT BARNS don't create jobs, but never mind the FACTS!]

Senator, I sat in the Senate Gallery and listened to your misstatements.
I have sent you emails correcting your 'misstatements' and you have ignored me.

Senator, I'm truly disappointed in your statements!
You haven't listened.



A Message from Chairman Crosby regarding the status of expanded gaming in Southeastern Massachusetts
In light of the Commission’s most recent request for public comment regarding Region C (Southeastern Mass) as well as recent media reports, I would like to take this opportunity to highlight several key points in our ongoing deliberations:
  • The Commission is keenly aware that the Commonwealth’s expanded gaming legislation contemplated only one casino in Region C. But it is equally true that the legislation did not contemplate Region C being left in a state of extended uncertainty while the other regions moved forward. Reconciling these two competing public policy goals fairly is the challenge the Commission is now trying to meet.

  • The Commission is considering a plan for Region C with the broadest range of options for the most parties, including protecting the Tribe’s option of getting land in trust in timely fashion, a plan that promotes the robust competition that has so successfully served the best interests of the Commonwealth in Regions A (Eastern Mass) and B (Western Mass). Under this plan, we would open Region C to commercial bidders, while the Tribe proceeds with its quest to get a Compact approved by the Legislature and its land in trust from the Department of the Interior. After the Commission reviews any commercial proposals we receive, we will then look at all the facts as they are at that time—including whether the Tribe has its land in trust and is ready to proceed with its project, and then decide what course of action is in the best interest of the Commonwealth and Southeastern Mass.

  • As we have said repeatedly, the Commission is deeply committed to understanding and acknowledging the Tribe’s legitimate interests and the progress the Tribe and the City of Taunton have made toward creation of a casino in Region C. This effort included a lengthy public hearing in Southeastern Mass to which all parties were invited to help us understand their views and beliefs, at which the Tribe and many of its supporters spoke; and at the Tribe’s urging, we contacted and discussed this issue with the Assistant Secretary of the Department of the Interior who is responsible for this matter in Washington.

  • At the same time, the Commission would be shirking its fundamental responsibilities if it failed to look at alternatives, since the status of the Tribe’s application for land in trust, and its ability to proceed with its casino project, cannot be predicted with certainty. As a result, we believe we must consider other steps that will protect the interests of the people of Southeastern Mass.
Finding the appropriate balance among all of these interests and concerns is not an easy task. But it is a task to which the Commission is committed. For that reason, the Commission took the lead in asking for public comment on the issue. The Commission’s request for comment remains posted at http://massgaming.com/news-events/requests-for-public-comments/ and it urges all interested members of the public to provide their comments. MGC will discuss Region C at its next open public meeting on Thursday, April 18th.

Below please find video footage of a recent open meeting in Region C where Commissioners heard from numerous constiuents with varying opinions on next steps for Southeastern Mass. Part 2 of the below video is also available on MGC’s YouTube channel





MGC Meeting - March 21, 2013 Part 1





MGC Meeting - March 21, 2013 Part 2

Monday, April 1, 2013

"We border on being an economic Appalachia"......





Published on Dec 23, 2012
Politicians say that casinos create economic development. Here is the Revel Casino in Atlantic City, NJ. (Most media photos are from the interior of the casino looking out onto the beach and ocean.)

Competing timelines sway Mashpee Wampanoag tribe casino bid

The Associated Press

By The Associated Press
on March 31, 2013

By JAY LINDSAY

BOSTON — The Mashpee Wampanoag have 12 millennia of history behind them, but whether their history to come includes a Massachusetts-licensed casino depends now on what a state commission believes will happen in the tribe's near future.

Lawmakers gave the tribe exclusive rights to southeastern Massachusetts' only casino license, but the Massachusetts Gaming Commission is considering opening the region to other bidders.

The Wampanoag's would-be competitors say the tribe faces so many legal and bureaucratic obstacles that it won't open a casino for a decade, if ever. But the tribe says it's making historic progress and plans to open its $500 million casino in Taunton in 2015.

The commission is left to decide which timeline will be most accurate. Commission Chairman Steve Crosby fretted over the task after he heard from both sides at a March 21 commission meeting.
Crosby offered that lawmakers clearly want to give the tribe a chance to make things work but don't want to give them forever. "And they are leaving it up to us to determine what forever is," he said.

"They would want us to understand how long this is going to take and make a decision based on that," he said. "And I don't know how we ever figure that out."

He has said he hopes the commission will vote by mid-April.

The state's 2011 casino law created a casino license for each of three geographic regions and gave exclusivity to the Wampanoag in the southeast. But the commission can open the area to other bidders if it determines the tribe's plans won't work.

Tribal chairman Cedric Cromwell has indicated that if bidding is opened, the tribe will stop pursuing a state license — eliminating any chance of state revenues from the project — and seek gambling rights exclusively through the federal government.

Before it can build anything, the Wampanoag need the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs to take the proposed 146-acre casino site in Taunton into trust for the tribe.

Opponents of extending the tribe's exclusivity say a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision prevents the Wampanoag from getting that land because it limits the land-taking to tribes that were federally recognized before the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934. The tribe, which was recognized in 2007, argues it can proceed by showing it was under federal jurisdiction as of 1934.

If the government awards the Wampanoag the land-in-trust, it will prompt immediate lawsuits that could last years, said Marsha Sajer, an attorney for KG Urban Enterprises, which wants to build a casino in New Bedford.

Washington state's Cowlitz tribe, which also wasn't federally recognized before 1934, has pursued land-in-trust under the same theory as the Wampanoag. And while the government did award the land in 2010, litigation has left the case unresolved a decade after it started, Sajer said.
She added that the land-in-trust process on its own is purposely long and deliberative, since casinos have such significant regional effects. As examples, she pointed to eight tribes from California to Michigan that have recently pursued land-in-trust to operate gambling facilities. Some cases stretch back a decade, and none has been resolved, she said.

History simply provides no basis for the Wampanoag's confidence about quick approvals and construction, Sajer said.

"I think it's optimism; I don't think it's reality, because they have not been able to distinguish why their situation would be any different from any other," she said.

New Bedford state Rep. Robert Koczera said forgoing years of jobs and revenue waiting for a Wampanoag casino that won't happen would be a travesty in the struggling region. Unemployment in its largest cities, New Bedford and Fall River, exceeds 14 percent.

"We border on being an economic Appalachia," Koczera said.

Economic development doesn't come from Predatory Gambling and what a pity Rep. Koczera ignores facts, reports and experience elsewhere. Short-sighted politicians helped create many of the problems. This region has many great untapped resources.  

For its part, the Wampanoag question whether the commission even has the authority to open up the bidding ahead of the government's land-in-trust decision.

The Wampanoag also dispute that the land-in-trust process will take years. In a letter from their lawyer, Howard Cooper, delivered to Crosby on Thursday, the tribe listed procedural markers it has already cleared, laid out a timeline for the others and noted that federal officials have vowed a speedy review.

The tribe said it expects a favorable land-in-trust decision by early 2014, when it will immediately move forward with the project. The only way to slow it down, Cooper said, will be if opponents seek a preliminary injunction to stop development. But he predicts that will fail.

"The soundness of the trust application of the Mashpee will overcome any request for a preliminary injunction," Cooper wrote.

State Sen. Marc Pacheco of Taunton said it's too early for the commission to open up the region, especially with the tribe making progress. Just Tuesday, he noted, the tribe reached agreement with Taunton officials about the specifics of their partnership. This, while the two other regions don't yet know where their casinos will be located because they have competing bidders.

Pacheco said he is not sure how long is too long to extend the tribe's exclusive rights, but that time hasn't come.

"They have been ahead of the game," he said.

http://www.masslive.com/business-news/index.ssf/2013/03/competing_timelines_sway_mashpee_wampano.html

Friday, October 19, 2012

Montigny hasn't decided whether he'd challenge renegotiated casino compact

What a shame Middleboro doesn't have a Senator like Senator Mark Montigny!


Montigny hasn't decided whether he'd challenge renegotiated casino compact
 
Sen. Mark Montigny, who attempted to block legislative approval of the casino agreement between the state and the Mashpee Wampanoag during the summer, hasn't decided whether he will try similar parliamentary maneuvering if a revised compact is resubmitted for legislative approval later this year.
 
“I don't believe they should try to refile this in informal session. I think it would be a violation of the spirit if not the letter of those rules,” the New Bedford Democrat said.
 
But, if it happens, “what the strategy would be is undetermined,” he said.
 
Gov. Deval Patrick and the tribe hammered out the agreement that would allow the Mashpee to operate a sovereign casino in Taunton. Montigny twice blocked Senate votes on the compact, but it eventually gained overwhelming approval of both houses, although the only SouthCoast legislators to endorse it were Sen. Marc Pacheco, D-Taunton, and Rep. Paul Schmid, D-Westport.
 
Clueless!
 
Last week, the federal Department of Interior rejected the compact because, among other issues, it would have required the tribe to pay the state 21.5 percent of gaming revenue, a price the department considered too steep. Commercial casinos will pay 25 percent of gaming revenues to the state.
 
Patrick and the tribe have said they plan to renegotiate the agreement and resubmit it to the Legislature, which has wrapped up formal sessions for this year. While the Legislature could vote to convene in formal session, the objection of any single legislator would block that action.
 
“We gave a great deal to the Wampaonoag and even that has been rejected,” Montigny said. “So if you believe, as I don't, by the way, that this is sound economic strategy and great revenue enhancement for the commonwealth, then you've just had that myth debunked because the federal government is saying that in order to provide this deal you'd have to tax them far less than the commercial.
 
“What I think they should do is look at the strategy from the beginning, where they attempted to please everyone and it has not proceeded well,” he said.
 

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Just another stepping stone politician



Ignoring the buckets of $$$$ requisite infrastructure improvements will cost Massachusetts taxpayers, Governor Slot Barns pats himself on the back for bringing Predatory Gambling to the Commonwealth.




Sights elsewhere, knowing he'll be out of the state when reality and disaster occur, why not? Another office holder who accomplished little, using the position as a stepping-stone. 





The scam of extra weekend patrols on highways, catching drunk drivers each weekend, failing to keep innocents safe. And then FREE ALCOHOL???





Most of the same environmental issues raised by Governor Slot Barns to the BIA in 2008 pertain to the Genting/Taunton site that remain unaddressed, save one significant issue: underestimated water consumption at the Taunton location that poses a significant issue to surrounding communities.

Same old! Same old! Just another isolated, tone-deaf politician.








MASHPEE — Although they haven't received final approval for it yet, members of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe this week will celebrate their casino compact with the state.

On Thursday, the tribe will hold a "day of celebration" from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. at tribal headquarters, according to a statement from the tribe.

Gov. Deval Patrick, who signed the compact with the tribe July 30, will attend from 12:30 to 2 p.m., the press release states.

The Mashpee Wampanoag, who hope to open a $500 million resort casino on 145 acres in East Taunton, await approval of the compact from the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs.

Tribal headquarters is located at 483 Great Neck Road South in Mashpee.

capecodonline.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlLcmlJjn_E


Busy day!

Massachusetts residents flock across the borders to catch flights to avoid the hell hole created by Logan, yet the Guv was too busy soaking up cultcha to attend.

Gov. Patrick Goes to Ballet and Snubs JetBlue CEO
Thursday, August 23, 2012

Joe Parello, GoLocalWorcester Contributor

While JetBlue CEO David Barger was in Worcester discussing the possibility of bringing a commercial airline back to the Commonwealth's second largest city, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick was 50 miles away touring the Boston Ballet.

Instead, Lt. Governor Tim Murray took the lead in Worcester as Barger met with state and local officials, along with representatives from Massport, about JetBlue potentially flying out of the now empty Worcester Regional Airport. With Murray in Worcester, Patrick chaired a meeting of the Governor's Council, usually Murray's responsibility, back at the state house at noon, before touring the ballet at 1 pm.

Patrick's Deputy Press Secretary Bonnie McGilpin says the choice was made because of Lt. Governor Murray's involvement in transportation issues [just don't let him drive!], and his deep ties to the City of Worcester.

"The meetings the Lieutenant Governor (had Wednesday) with JetBlue leadership are part of an important effort to attract commercial airline service to Worcester Regional Airport," McGilpin said.

"As a former mayor of Worcester, the Lieutenant Governor works closely with the Commonwealth’s municipalities and Gateway Cities to support initiatives that create jobs, economic development, and is the lead on many efforts to bolster our transportation network. The Governor receives regular updates from the Lieutenant Governor and the rest of his team on the progress of these projects and is looking forward to a strong partnership with JetBlue as they consider expanding in Worcester."

Konnie Lukes, who succeeded Murray as Mayor of Worcester and currently serves on the City Council, says she knew Murray would be in Worcester for the luncheon regardless. She also views the Governor's absence as a sign that he wants more than a luncheon when he comes to Central Massachusetts.

"Murray is a Worcester guy and he wants to keep his support in the area," Lukes said. "To me, the question is, should it have been Murray and Governor Patrick here? With him in Boston, that clearly indicates that the Governor is not coming for a love-fest, he's waiting for a deal to get done."

Barger did claim to be very impressed with Worcester on his visit, saying it topped the list of cities attempting to woo his young airline. The CEO's comments, along with the comments of City Manager Michael O'Brien at yesterday's press conference seem to indicate that it is a matter of when, and not if, a deal will be finalized between Massport and JetBlue.

Still, local Republican leaders saw Patrick's absence as a sign that the Governor will soon be leaving the Commonwealth for Washington. Patrick has been campaigning for President Obama's reelection as recently as Tuesday night, and Chris Pinto of the Worcester Republican City Committee thinks Patrick is more concerned about positioning himself for a cabinet position than serving the needs of Massachusetts.

JetBlue CEO David Barger speaking at Worcester's Beechwood Hotel yesterday.

"Is touring the Boston Ballet more important than locking up a commercial airline for the state's second largest city?" Pinto asked. "The governor not showing up doesn't surprise me, he's been absentee leadership lately, and it seems he's already thinking about a position in Washington."

While the meaning of Patrick's absence can be debated, Murray did intimate that the Governor has been involved with the Worcester Regional Airport. In fact, he says it was a question from the Governor five years ago that started the process of bringing JetBlue to Worcester.

"Back in 2007, as we began having a conversation about transportation reform, Governor Patrick asked me about Worcester Airport," Murray said. "I shared with him the fact that the City of Worcester and Massport had a partnership… Two years ago we were able to complete a deal and the city transferred the airport to Massport for $15 million. And Massport began aggressively making investments in the airport and reaching out to the people they have the pleasure of doing business with every day now. First and foremost, JetBlue."

http://www.golocalworcester.com/news/did-patrick-snub-worcester-with-jetblue-ceo-david-barger-in-town/


Chairman Cromwell introduced Deval Patrick, calling him the "best governor in the United States of America." The governor in turn, said the compact was forged in the spirit of collaboration and cooperation and that it represents the best interests of both the people of the Commonwealth and the
people of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe.
 
[And when you have to pay Genting back at usury rates, how will he look?]