Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Mayor Alex Morse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mayor Alex Morse. Show all posts

Thursday, October 16, 2014

MARK YOUR CALENDAR! Join Us for a Free Night with Bob Steele and Jimmy Tingle!








You're invited to MASS MADNESS: A Night of Comic and Common Sense on the Casino Debate on Tuesday, October 21st at 6:30, hosted by Holyoke Mayor Alex Morse, and featuring author Bob Steele and humorist Jimmy Tingle.

  • It's going to be a great event!
  • No reservations needed!
  • First come, first serve - so get there early!

QUESTIONS?

About Bob Steele
Robert H. Steele is the author of The Curse: Big-Time Gambling's Seduction of a Small New England Town. As a Ledyard, CT resident with a ring-side seat to the development of the CT casinos Mr. Steele's novel provides us with an engaging insight into the potential future for Massachusetts and the gambling industry. He is Chairman of Connecticut-based NLC Insurance and has been a director of other companies, including the American Stock Exchange. He graduated from Amherst College and Columbia University, and served in the CIA and in Congress.

About Jimmy Tingle

This well-informed son of Massachusetts brings a unique wit to the political twists and turns of the 2014 campaign and the casino referendum. His credits include films and turns on MSNBC, PBS, the BBC, The Tonight Show, CNN, Late Night with Conan O'Brien, Larry King's Weekend, The American Comedy Awards, and his own HBO comedy special. He was born in Cambridge, graduated from Harvard and recently completed his MPA at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

About Alex Morse

Alex Morse is the current mayor of Holyoke, elected the youngest mayor of that city at age 22, defeating the incumbent Mayor, and
re-elected to a second term, defeating a businessman.

Repeal the Casino Deal | wmassvyo3@gmail.com
59 Meridian Street 2nd Floor, East Boston, MA 02128


(617) 569 2599 | www.repealthecasinodeal.org


6.30 PM
Tuesday Evening
x
OCTOBER 21

Holyoke Senior Center
291 Pine Street
Holyoke MA 01040

YES on 3
Repeal the Casino Deal

CAMPAIGN
OFFICES

EAST BOSTON
59 Meridian Street
2nd Floor
Boston MA
T Accessible

SPRINGFIELD
130 Maple Street
Suite 241
Springfield MA

MAIN CONTACTS
Field Director
Brain Ashmankas
repealfielddirector@gmail.com
Call/Text 774-276-1281

Western Massachusetts
Al Cabot
WMassVYO3@gmail.com Call/Text 413-438-4963

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Holyoke's Mayoral Election



As Holyoke election looms, mayoral candidate Jeff Stanek says his casino opposition has been consistent, which Mayor Alex Morse disputes

2013 alex morse vs jeff stanek.jpg
Mayoral candidate Jeff Stanek, right, said Friday he has "consistently opposed" a casino here despite assertions to the contrary about his position by Mayor Alex Morse, left. (The Republican [file])
 
Mike Plaisance, The Republican By Mike Plaisance, The Republicanmasslive.com
Email the author | Follow on Twitter
on November 01, 2013 at 7:36 PM
 
HOLYOKE — Mayoral candidate Jeffrey A. Stanek said Friday he has "consistently opposed" a casino here despite assertions to the contrary about his position by Mayor Alex B. Morse.

"I will not seek or entertain a casino for Holyoke if I am elected. We cannot allow this issue to divide our city," Stanek said in a press release.

"I have consistently opposed casino development for Holyoke. Statements from my opponent to the contrary are simply not true," Stanek said.

Holyoke appears to be out of the hunt for the sole gaming-resort license that the state Gaming Commission will grant for Western Massachusetts. But the issue's zombie-like ability to keep rising is underscored by a nonbinding question voters here Tuesday will face on the Election Day ballot asking, "Should the city of Holyoke have a resort style gaming casino?"

Voters approved similar casino questions here in 2002 and 1995.

Where Morse has wrongly presented his position on casino gambling, Stanek said in an email, is by saying that Stanek's vow to at least to listen to Holyokers who favor a casino means a Stanek administration would welcome a gaming resort here.

"I am personally against it, I will still not seek a casino developer. Listening does not mean I'm accepting casino gambling. We must make sure Holyoke is at the table for any spin-off benefits from Springfield or Palmer. It is going to one of two cities, not Holyoke. What is the point of allowing citizens to vote if our elected officials are close-minded?" Stanek said.

But, Morse said, Stanek himself has made statements that leave the door open to considering a casino proposal.
 
In a Sept. 12 interview with The Republican, Stanek said: "What's it hurt to try to get a good plan to see what it's like? But I think that's going to be a little bit of the difference with me. I'm going to put some personal feelings aside and do what the voters asked for. At least do my research and my due diligence on it, and see what happens from there."
 
I am personally against it, I will still not seek a casino developer. Listening does not mean I'm accepting casino gambling.
- Jeff Stanek

At an Oct. 30 debate on WWLP TV 22, Stanek reiterated his opposition to a casino here, but also said, "... the reality of it is, you know, we need taxable jobs here in the city of Holyoke. We need to increase our taxable base, and we can't be closed-minded to things either."

Morse said, "I’m glad my opponent agrees with my position, one that has remained clear and unchanged all campaign. However, I would challenge that his position has been consistently opposed to a casino development in Holyoke."

Stanek has said casino gambling is one of the issues on which Morse has flip-flopped. Morse a year ago announced he would consider casino proposals, after having won the 2011 election opposing a casino. But Morse said the brief consideration was exploratory and he remains opposed to a casino here.

Stanek's statement that he would be willing to listen to voters if Tuesday's casino question passes, said Morse, "seems to be a classic flip flop."

Morse said Stanek was wrong in saying Holyoke has been uninvolved in talks to ensure the city participates in a surrounding-community agreement to benefit from a neighboring casino.

http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/11/as_holyoke_election_looms_mayo.html

 
 

Sunday, October 27, 2013

Holyoke: "Should the city of Holyoke have a resort style gaming casino?"

No community in the Commonwealth will ever be safe until we REPEAL THE CASINO DEAL!

Holyoke voters face nonbinding questions on casino gambling, needle exchange on Election Day ballot


 

HOLYOKE -- It's not just politicians on the Election Day ballot here Nov. 5 as voters also will be asked to vote on nonbinding questions regarding casino gambling and needle exchange.

Question 1 asks, "Should the city of Holyoke have a resort style gaming casino?"

Question 2 asks, "Should the city of Holyoke have a needle exchange program?"

Voters approved nonbinding casino questions here in 2002 and 1995, and rejected needle exchange in a nonbinding question in 2001.

City councilors voted in January to put the casino question on the ballot and in June to add the needle exchange question. Councilors said voters deserved a say on casino gambling and needle exchange despite decisions by Mayor Alex B. Morse.

Under a November 2011, licenses will be issued for up to three casino resorts in the state, including one in Western Massachusetts.

The gaming law requires that a developer reach a host-city agreement with a mayor or other community leader in order for such a project to proceed to a community vote. Morse wavered in November when he briefly said he would consider casino plans, but remains opposed -- and that means a casino project cannot move forward here as long as he is mayor.

Springfield voters approved the host community agreement between the city and MGM Resorts International for a gaming resort there on July 16. Palmer voters will decide a similar question on Nov. 5 regarding Mohegan Sun's plan off the Massachusetts Turnpike.

Councilors said Morse's opposition was unfair to Holyokers who wanted to give their current opinion about casino gambling, so they voted to offer the nonbinding question.

"It's a good opportunity for the citizens of Holyoke to have their voices be heard," Ward 2 Councilor Anthony Soto said during the Jan. 15 meeting.

Ward 7 residents have been vocal in fighting a casino here because previous plans have envisioned a gaming resort on the Mount Tom range.

John Epstein, of Harvard Street, said he is among those hoping Holyokers vote down the nonbinding casino question. The same negatives apply, he said: A casino would increase traffic and reduce property values. And, with two casinos permitted elsewhere in Massachusetts and casinos in adjoining states, revenue would be scarce, he said.

"They're just pulling the money out of the local economy," Epstein said.

Despite Holyoke currently being out of play, casino foes remain concerned. What if, they've asked, MGM fails the state Gaming Commission background check and is rejected, and then Palmer voters say no on the casino question there? Would that scenario put a Holyoke proposal back in play?

“In the unlikely event that no Western Mass. applicant made it to the commission’s final application phase, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission would start the process over again in Western Massachusetts," commission chairman Stephen P. Crosby said in an interview Friday.

While Crosby initially told a reporter, "We don't anticipate that being the case," he went on to explain: "We just have no anticipation one way or the other. We have no data on what the vote is going be like in Palmer. We don't have a background check yet on MGM, so we have no expectations one way or the other."

MGM officials have said they are confident that the company will be found "suitable" by the commission, passing its background check.

Mohegan Sun officials have also said they are confident their plan will be approved by Palmer voters, though they are not taking the vote for granted.

The state deadline for developers to submit a final resort casino application is Dec. 31.

Under the law's current timeline, communities must allow a 60- to 90-day window between the signing of a host community agreement and the community referendum vote, which is a prerequisite for the final application.


http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/10/holyoke_voters_face_nonbinding.html

 

Friday, October 25, 2013

Why Holyoke isn't safe

NO COMMUNITY IN THE COMMONWEALTH WILL EVER BE SAFE
FROM PREDATORY GAMBLING UNTIL WE REPEAL THE CASINO DEAL!

FROM: Lyn Horan
We Are NOT Safe
From The Threat of a
HOLYOKE CASINO
Here's Why:
...

1. The Holyoke City Council has placed a
referendum question on the November
ballot asking if voters approve of placing a
casino in Holyoke.

2. Eric Suher, owner of Mountain Park, was
recently spotted meeting with a casino
executive.

3. Hard Rock Casino, who recently lost their
bid in West Springfield, is searching for
another location and already has a fully
developed plan to build a Holyoke casino at
Wyckoff Country Club on Easthampton
Road. Their plan is ready to go. All they
need is a receptive mayor.

4.Jeff Stanek has said that pursuing a casino
for Holyoke is a good idea. (Alex Morse
previously turned down Hard Rock and is
firmly opposed to bringing a casino to
Holyoke).

5. The Massachusetts gaming law gives the
Mayor sole power to negotiate a deal with
casino developers. They do not need
additional authority from other city entities.

6. There is over a billion dollars
($1,000,000,000) at stake. It would be
foolish to believe that developers, operators
and property owners would simply walk
away from the temptation of this kind of
money without putting up a fight.

7. With the junctions of I-91 and The Mass
Pike on our doorstep, many informed

people believe that Holyoke would be at
the very top of the Gaming Commission's
list – if it is back in play.
8. Any casino developer who has already paid
the $400,000 Phase I application fee to the
state, can pursue a casino in any
community which approves it, including
Holyoke. The Phase I application is NOT
location-specific.

9. Contrary to common misconception,
Springfield does NOT have a lock on the
casino. Just over a year ago everyone was
saying that Palmer had it sewn up and that
Springfield didn't stand a chance. NO ONE
has it locked in, because the final decision
rests entirely with the Gaming Commission
and no one knows which site they will pick.

10. The deadlines posted by the Mass. Gaming
Commission (MGC) are not absolute.
They are described as "likely" target dates.
If the MGC decides to shift the deadline by
just 90 days, Holyoke will be back in play
after this election. That shift is at the sole
discretion of the Gaming Commission.

11. If Palmer voters defeat Mohegan Sun on
November 5th; and if the MGC denies
MGM because of their Macau partnership
with daughter of organized crime leader
Stanley Ho (as happened in New Jersey); or
if the MGC recognizes that traffic on I-91
and the 3 bridges will be unmanageable –
Holyoke will be back in the running.

12. The threat to Holyoke will exist until the
day that the Mass. Gaming Commission
gives final approval to a developer to build
the casino elsewhere. Until that day comes,
we are not safe from the threat of a
Holyoke casino.

Presented by:
Citizens for a Better Holyoke
P.O. Box 6543
Holyoke, MA 01041
CitizensForABetterHolyoke@gmail.com

COMING SOON:
A VOTER’S GUIDE TO THE
CANDIDATES WHO OPPOSE
A HOLYOKE CASINO
See More

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Chicopee and Paper City Request Extension



Paper City Development and Chicopee mayor petition state gaming commission for more time to file casino application



Robert Rizzuto, The Republican By Robert Rizzuto, The Republican

The Republican
on January 15, 2013 Citing the several changes of heart Holyoke Mayor Alex Morse has had on the issue of casino gambling, Paper City Development and Chicopee Mayor Michael Bissonnette are asking the Massachusetts Gaming Commission for more time to file an application and the $400,000 non-refundable fee to be considered for the region's sole gaming license.

The Republican/MassLive.com learned late Tuesday that Paper City Development retained the Nicolai Law Firm in Springfield to draft the petition, which was delivered to the gaming commission's Boston office at 3 p.m. today – just two hours before the official "Phase 1" deadline.

Paul Nicolai, the limited liability company's lawyer, said the petition was a result of Morse's back-and-forth on the issue and how it impacted Paper City Development's potential to develop a resort casino in the Pioneer Valley.

"Frankly, it's tough to pay $400,000 and fill out an application for a gaming license when you don't know that if you get the gaming license, you've got ground to build the casino on, and that's the problem," Nicolai said. "The mayor of Holyoke has changed his mind a couple of times and tonight the city council is considering whether the people should decide whether a casino should come to Holyoke. So we've filed a petition to give us 30 days after the (potential U.S. Senate special) election to file an application assuming that Holyoke decides they want to go forward."

Tuesday evening, the Holyoke City Council is expected to vote on a non-binding referendum about casino gambling which would go before the voters as they hit the polls later this year to decide a replacement for U.S. Sen. John Kerry, who is expected to be confirmed as the next secretary of state for President Barack Obama.

The council is also looking at adding another non-binding referendum on the issue of a needle exchange in Holyoke, which Morse pushed through without their approval.

Considering Morse settled on opposing casino gambling but is a strong supporter of the city's needle exchange program, it may come as no surprise that the council tackles these issues as he is out of the country on vacation. But Morse said Tuesday evening that the council wasn't aware of his vacation plans when planning the meeting agenda.

When reached by reporter Michael Plaisance, Morse said he thinks the overture from Paper City Development is too little, too late.

"It's a dead issue, and Paper City Development is playing politics. I don't see any operator coming to Holyoke given my position," Morse said. "I urge the Massachusetts Gaming Commission to abide by their own timetable and resist playing politics with Paper City Development. I'm very pleased that

Paper City Development failed to submit their application by the deadline. More proof they are just making noise, as just last week they pledged to submit."

Morse later added that even if the council approves he non-binding referendums on casinos and the needle exchange, he wouldn't approve their appearance on the ballot- effectively killing the measures.

After Morse's initial opposition to a Holyoke casino, Paper City Development apparently was also negotiating a land acquisition deal in Chicopee to put a resort casino in that city's downtown. But when Morse announced he would consider such a facility in his city in a surprise twist of events, negotiations with Chicopee became less a priority.

Bissonnette also wrote a letter to the gaming commission on Tuesday supporting Paper City Development's plea for more time.

Additionally, Newton resident Charles J. Petitti, who proposed building the Good Samaritan Casino Hotel -- with mini-museums dedicated to Elvis Presley, Norman Rockwell and the Miss America Pageant in Holyoke, also asked for an extension.

The commission will ultimately decide what happens next; no timetable has been set for acting on the extension requests.

The four major casino companies expressing an interest in developing a Western Massachusetts resort casino have all made today's 5 p.m. deadline.
 
A full report on today's casino application deadline will be in Wednesday's issue of The Republican and on the 11 p.m. CBS-3 Springfield Evening News.


http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2013/01/paper_city_development_and_chi.html

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Facts Changed Mayor Morse's Mind

Click on the link below to review documents requested by the Republican in November.

The biggest disappointment is that The Republican has been a primary proponent of Casino Gambling, reporting one-sided information, until this article.

Those supporters who allow themselves to be blinded by the false promises without conducting their due diligence and investigating the costs and impacts of Gambling elsewhere should be embarrassed.

This is not what you think!


Documents trace Holyoke Mayor Alex Morse's consideration of casino gambling, Eric Suher's offers of downtown investment


HOLYOKE -- The Die Cut Card building at the corner of Front and
Dwight streets was one of several downtown properties targeted for
investment as part of a Mountain Park casino proposal presented by
Eric Suher to city officials in September.

By Greg Saulmon, The Republican
on January 12, 2013

HOLYOKE — Mayor Alex B. Morse's initial reaction in mid-September to a casino proposal floated by entertainment and real estate mogul Eric Suher was terse: "I don't like it."

The response, sent on Sept. 13, came just over a half hour after the city’s planning and economic development director, Marcos A. Marrero, forwarded an email to the mayor in which Suher outlined a list of potential benefits to the city.

Suher -- who grew up in the Paper City, launched his business career here, and is still a resident -- promised significant investment for the city's downtown. He also offered funding for programs at Holyoke Community College and William J. Dean Technical High School to accompany his proposed casino at Mountain Park.

The emails are included in nearly 500 pages of documents obtained by The Republican and MassLive.com in a Nov. 28 request to the city for release of public records. The request was filed in the days after Morse announced he would consider proposals from would-be casino developers, a change of heart from the strong anti-casino position he took in his 2011 campaign for mayor. Within three weeks, Morse changed his mind yet again, announcing on Dec. 13 that he would not negotiate with casino developers after all.

Earlier in 2012, Morse had virtually shut another would-be casino developer, Paper City Development, out of the game when its principals pitched a casino plan for Wyckoff Country Club.

The mayor also penned an anti-casino editorial, "No Dice," in CommonWealth magazine's October issue in which he outlined the city's non-casino strategies for economic development.

With Morse's announcement on Nov. 26 that the city would enter the casino process, Suher's Mountain Park plan emerged as the apparent frontrunner. The gaming resort was proposed for land Suher acquired in 2006 and 2007, including one property bought by a corporation he named Dadgayadoh MA, a Seneca Indian word that means "gambling men."

Paper City Development also got back in the action, resurrecting its Wyckoff proposal. A third possible site surfaced with Charles J. Petitti pitching a downtown “nonprofit” casino that he called “Good Sam’s,” a play on “good Samaritan.”

Now, with the state Gaming Commission’s Jan. 15 deadline looming for developers to submit a $400,000 fee and application materials, it is unclear if the casino debate for Holyoke will resume or die.

A partner in Paper City Development says the group will file the nonrefundable fee to the state Gaming Commission by Tuesday.

"We are still in, working it every day, through Christmas and New Year's with lawyers and others," partner Anthony L. Cignoli wrote in an email to The Republican on Jan. 3. (See related story.)
Suher declined to say if will submit the fee and application. He said renewed discussion of casino meetings he had with city officials amounted to "trying to beat a dead horse."

Holyoke's casino supporters have vowed to gather signatures needed to place a non-binding referendum on the November municipal election ballot, asking if voters want a casino. Holyoke voters approved casino questions in 2002 and 1995.

The documents obtained by The Republican outline the rise and fall of Morse’s willingness to engage with casino developers. They also document the role Marrero took in bringing Suher's proposal to the mayor and ultimately offering cautionary notes about the process after the pair visited a Bethlehem, Pa., casino in late November.

The documents also reveal the extensive, but short-lived, role that consultant David B. Panagore, once chief development officer for the city of Springfield, played in the early stages of Holyoke’s casino process.

The Suher bet
Marrero, who previously worked as a land-use and environmental planner with the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission, took his post as Holyoke’s director of planning and economic development on May 14. He was appointed by Morse in April.

ae-1113-suher-casino.jpg11.26.2012 | HOLYOKE -- Eric Suher, right, attends the press
conference in November at which Mayor Alex B. Morse
announced that he would consider casino proposals.


Emails show that Marrero contacted Suher on Aug. 31 to ask for a meeting the week of Sept. 10. The agenda which Marrero proposed included discussion of a number of Suher’s properties in the city -- "particularly the Die Cut Card building” at 439 Dwight St., he wrote.

Marrero's meeting with Suher took place on Sept. 12 and lasted two hours, according to one of the emails obtained by The Republican.

Suher wrote to Marrero in a Sept. 13 email, “I appreciate you taking the time yesterday. I do understand the mayor’s issue, but I feel strongly that this project is SO different from the previous Wyckoff plan, we need to seriously look at this, rather than just say no.”

Suher then outlined benefits to the city that his Mountain Park proposal would bring. He noted he had “taken care to make certain that Ward 7 would not be affected by traffic, noise, etc.” Much of the Ward 7 neighborhood, which runs along the Route 5 corridor on the northern side of the city, lies within close proximity to the Mountain Park site.

Suher's plan, according to the email, placed a “huge emphasis on downtown investment and economic sustainability.”

That investment would include locating the casino's management offices downtown, “with further investment in (the) 439 Dwight St. mill building for restaurant and cafe along the canal.”

Suher also proposed investing in market-rate residential housing downtown and offered money to complete the CanalWalk, including adding “canal laser light fountains.” Renderings submitted by Suher show a nightscape of the city, with the fountains in a stretch of the first-level canal that runs along Heritage State Park.

Suher also proposed building “an indoor / outdoor downtown mercado” and linking the casino to downtown by offering transportation between Mountain Park and the recently built Holyoke Transportation Center on Maple Street.

Other proposed investments included an endowment for a culinary school at Holyoke Community College, a culinary program at Dean Tech and other unspecified programs.

As for the casino itself, Suher said, the project would mean “two thousand plus jobs for Holyoke residents” and that the proposed resort would include a convention center and 300-room hotel, a “music amphitheater with covered seating that would attract world class entertainers” and a “recreation facility that would attract people from all over the region”

There was no price tag attached to all of Suher's proposed projects. Suher said the footprint for the project, including access ramps from Interstate 91, would fit within the parcels he already owns around the Mountain Park property.

holyoke-fountain-rendering.jpgFountains equipped with laser lights, seen here in a rendering
submitted as part of a package of documents relating to casino
proposals in Holyoke, were part of Eric Suher's plan to marry
downtown investment with a Mountain Park casino.

“This would send a huge message to the Holyoke (and surrounding) business community, enabling the city to attract additional business investment,” Suher wrote. “I am a lifelong city resident, and I have been investing in Holyoke since I was 18. I would never propose a project that I feel would be detrimental to the city or its residents.”

In interviews about the project, Suher has said he was negotiating with Len and Mark Wolman, principals in the Waterford Group, of Waterford, Conn., to operate the casino. The Wolmans have been in partnerships on casino projects, including the Mohegan Sun in Uncasville, Conn., which is proposing a resort casino in Palmer.

Marrero’s meeting with Suher came at the same time Morse sought the planning director's input for his anti-casino editorial. Morse first asked Marrero to review the editorial on Sept. 11, emails show.

One of the emails from the morning of Sept. 12 shows Marrero responded to the mayor that he had been in a meeting with Suher and hadn’t yet reviewed the piece. “We need to talk,” he added.
Suher’s email outlining the casino details arrived on the afternoon of Sept. 13, and Marrero fowarded it to Morse at 2:55 p.m. Morse’s response, “I don’t like it,” came just over a half hour later.

Morse’s initial resistance, though, appears to fade over the course of the next few weeks, the municipal documents show.

Copies of Morse’s calendar obtained by The Republican show he met with Marrero, city solicitor Elizabeth Rodriguez-Ross and treasurer Jon Lumbra on Sept. 25 “re: Eric Suher.” Morse said the meeting was to discuss the details Suher had sent on Sept. 13, and that this was the first time he met with other city officials to discuss Suher’s proposal.

Morse met with Suher at 3 p.m. on Nov. 13, his calendar shows, and the mayor confirmed that casinos were on the agenda for that meeting.

Both Marrero and Morse said they had no knowledge of Suher approaching any other city officials regarding a casino prior to Marrero’s Sept. 12 meeting. Marrero said he met with Suher on earlier occasions to discuss Suher’s “Pleasant Crossing” site at the corner of Hampden and Pleasant streets.

The topic of casinos did not arise during those meetings, Marrero said.

“There really is no further story to be told about meetings with Morse and Marrero that hasn't already been told,” Suher said in an email response for comment for this story. “Someone's trying to beat a dead horse.”

The mayor says Suher's proposal never amounted to any firm plans: “There was never a complete ‘plan’ shown to the City, merely a concept that Mr. Suher presented us.”

Morse added this week, “Even today, I haven't seen a plan from Suher other than what the public knows about, which was a general concept for a casino resort on Mt. Tom with a few Downtown components.”

Asked what happened between the Sept. 13 email in which he dismissed Suher’s proposal and his Nov. 26 announcement that he would consider casino proposals, Morse said only, “I felt that my job as mayor required me to give it more thought, and in an effort to be transparent, I thought it was necessary to deliberate publicly.”

A house of (Die Cut) cardsSuher, through his company ES Development Corp., bought the four-story Holyoke Die Cut Card building in November 2001 for $157,500. The vacant building, located at 439 Dwight St., sits across Front Street from a municipal parking garage and across Dwight from the Volleyball Hall of Fame and Heritage State Park. The building and land are currently assessed at $258,900, according to city records.

The Die Cut Card building is highlighted in blue.
Suher is also a principal of Trident Holyoke LLC.,
which owns the 72 Front St. property
bounded by a blue line. Enlarge map.

























It is one of several Suher-owned properties in Holyoke that figure in the city’s economic development and downtown revitalization efforts, some of which have vexed Paper City officials for years.

In October 2010, Suher sought a zoning change to build a parking lot at Mountain Park, which aroused suspicions among neighbors that he was gearing up for a possible gaming facility. A meeting to discuss the zoning change drew questions from city councilors about his plans for his Pleasant Crossing property, which had been sitting idle since he purchased it in 2005. At the time, Suher faced a November 2010 deadline to determine a use for the lot or see it revert to city ownership for $1. He had already received six previous extensions.


After the meeting, then-Mayor Elaine A. Pluta said she had also frequently asked about Suher’s intentions for the Die Cut building. Suher said on multiple occasions that he hoped to convert the property into market-rate housing, but was waiting until the Holyoke Housing Authority renovated the nearby Lyman Terrace housing complex.

Suher was, to the city's benefit several years earlier, the first of several property owners along the proposed CanalWalk to sign a formal easement with the city. The easements, signed in 2007 for Suher’s property at 72 Front St. and the die-cut building, allowed the city to move forward with the first phase of the project.

The promise to include funding to complete the CanalWalk as part of his casino development would have brought the project full circle, since he helped get it off the ground nearly six years ago.

Other benefits Suher listed in his casino concept were more speculative, involving land he does not already own.

A map of Suher's proposed downtown investments shows "Future Market Rate Housing" located at Lyman Terrace, bounded by High, Lyman, Front and John streets. The low-income, 167-unit housing project managed by the Holyoke Housing Authority was slated for demolition early in 2012, but it won a reprieve when Morse called for studying other options.

holyoke-rendering-map.jpgView full sizeA map included with documents provided in
response to a records request by The Republican shows areas
of downtown investment, proposed with Suher's plan for a
Mountain Park Casino.

Suher's conceptual map shows the downtown “mercado” located on city-owned land at 191 Appleton St. The “restaurant and outdoor terrace” are shown on Front Street, adjacent to the Die Cut building on land currently occupied by Suher’s Canal Place building at 72 Front St., now home to offices for several state agencies, and a building at 120 Front St. owned by Edward A. Owen, of West Springfield.

Morse said Suher's focus on downtown investment helped persuade him to reconsider a casino proposal for the city.

“The preliminary commitment to downtown, including the investments mentioned above (CanalWalk, Die Cut Card Building, seed money for the Holyoke Redevelopment Authority), did play a role in my decision to consider proposals,” the mayor said. "Furthermore, given the budgetary constraints on the City, the possibility of millions of dollars in additional tax revenue would compel any Mayor to look twice. I needed to explore whether or not it would be possible to achieve those goals – a casino in the City and a revitalized Downtown.”

The upgrades Suher proposed mirrored the city's plan for downtown redevelopment, known as “Connect. Construct. Create: A Plan for the Revitalization of Center City Holyoke,” that was released in September. And, emails obtained by The Republican show that concurrent to his casino negotiations Suher was working with city officials to lure a national restaurant chain to the Pleasant Crossing site.

Cornerstones of the “Connect. Construct. Create” plan include improving downtown housing options and rehabilitating blighted properties. CanalWalk is listed as a featured project.

Both Morse and Marrero said the plan can move ahead without investment from Suher as part of a casino deal.

“The Redevelopment Authority along with many city officials and participating citizens worked hard for several years to put a comprehensive plan in place that wouldn't sit on a shelf, but could be executed with success,” Marrero said. He added: “A casino (and funding from it) was never part of that plan, so the absence of a casino will not hinder it.”

A consultant's role
Another entry in the mayor’s calendar shows Morse initially met on Sept. 7 at 10:30 a.m. with Panagore, who most recently worked as chief operating officer in Hartford.

Morse said the crux of the Sept. 7 meeting was that Panagore “wanted to discuss opportunities in Holyoke and in Western Massachusetts.” The meeting did not involve any discussion of casinos, Morse said. He had been eager to take the meeting with Panagore, he said, because, “I have great respect for David, and he brings a unique set of experiences to the table, coupled with expertise and passion, like no one else I know.”

Panagore had resigned from his post in Hartford on Aug. 20, setting his last day as Sept. 14. At the time, he told the Hartford Courant he didn’t have another job in place. “I just didn't feel it was fair to undertake a job search while on the city's payroll.”

Panagore resurfaced in Holyoke when Morse announced in late November that he would consider casino proposals. Under the plan Morse laid out, Panagore would serve as a development consultant for the city, with fees to be paid by whichever operator managed the resort's casino.

A contract proposal with Panagore, dated Dec. 4, was included in the documents obtained by The Republican.

Under the contract, Panagore would work under the direction of Marrero to “... manage the City’s available assets and resources on behalf of the Mayor in order to successfully represent the City’s interests consistent with its development strategy, facilitate all facets of the development process relative to the potential location of a casino in Holyoke.”

Panagore was expected to review casino license applications and plans, assist with media relations and facilitate community outreach. He would also “act as principal point of negotiation for any agreement with project proponents, as contemplated by the Gaming Act, including developing host community services,” the contract proposal states.

The proposed agreement carried an option for the city to renew it on Oct. 1, 2013. It set a ceiling of 100 hours.

An invoice dated Dec. 3 and submitted on Dec. 6 shows Panagore billed the city for $4,640 to cover 29 hours of work at $160 an hour between Nov. 20 and Dec. 4. The itemized work list includes conducting research, meeting with Morse and other city officials and drafting a letter to potential casino developers.

Panagore played a role in the run-up to the mayor's Nov. 26 press conference, billing one hour at $160 for time on Nov. 25 to prepare for the event. On the day of the press conference, he billed for $1,360 to cover 8.5 hours of work.

On Dec. 4, a day for which he billed the city $960 for six hours of work, Panagore reportedly assisted Morse and Marrero in crafting an invitation to area mayors for a regional meeting on casinos, according to the documents.

Emails show that Panagore was also asked to participate in weekly meetings with city officials to discuss the casino issue. Tessa Murphy-Romboletti, assistant to the mayor, emailed Panagore and others on Nov. 29 to schedule the meetings. The first one was set for Dec. 3.

Panagore’s emails exchanged with city officials show he worked for Holyoke right up until Morse's Dec. 13 announcement. On Dec. 10, for instance, Morse forwarded a query from a reporter to Panagore, asking for thoughts on how to respond. The next day, Marrero asked Panagore for input on how to respond to questions from Paper City Development principals.

On the day Morse went public with his suspension of the casino proposal process, Panagore posted a link via Twitter to The Republican / MassLive.com’s coverage of the announcement. Later that night, Panagore wrote, "Mayor amazes me with his integrity & courage. Once he knew he had decided, he acted. No pretense, no wasted expense.”

Morse said this week that the city has ended its consulting relationship with Panagore.

The Bethlehem effect
What ultimately led Morse to reverse course on casinos the second time left many observers puzzled.
In interviews, Morse cited strong and vocal opposition from the community. He was jeered by a crowd outside his office when he held his Nov. 26 press conference, and casino opponents in the city quickly mobilized in the days that followed.

"At a time when our community needs unity of purpose, a year-long debate over locating a casino within our borders would only sow division and discord," Morse said when he announced his suspension of the casino process.

Bethlehem Mayor John B. Callahan gives a presentation on
the process to bring the Sands Resort Casino to his city.
The discussion was part of the City2City Greater Springfield's
learning trip to the Lehigh Valley in Pennsylvania.
Robert Rizzuto | The Republican


Records show that a trip Morse and other city officials took to Pennsylvania in late November also influenced his decision. During that trip, part of the City2City program organized by the Federal Reserve of Boston and Philadelphia, Morse, Marrero and Lumbra joined other Western Massachusetts representatives to tour the sprawling Sands Casino Resort at the former Bethlehem Steel property.

“There are real risks when you introduce gaming or gambling to a community, and a municipality needs to be vigilant in planning to mitigate such problems," Bethlehem Mayor John Callahan told his visitors. "We spent a lot of time traveling to other cities with casinos and ended up working together as a region to make it work for everybody.”

On Dec. 10, Marrero sent an email to Morse detailing his notes from the Pennsylvania trip and expressing doubts about whether the economic success Bethlehem found hosting a casino could translate to Holyoke.

“There were a few notable economic, procedural and site-specific circumstances under which Bethlehem’s (gaming-licensed resort) was provided a successful project and model of GLR development,” Marrero wrote. “It is highly questionable whether those circumstances currently exist in Holyoke.”

Listing differences between Bethlehem and Holyoke, Marrero noted the Pennsylvania casino’s proximity to the large New Jersey and New York markets, and cited the Bethlehem mayor's description of the Sands Casino -- with its tagline of “Closer than you think,” -- as “convenience gambling on steroids.” Marrero wrote that the largest markets a Holyoke casino could draw from – Boston and New York – would ultimately have casino resorts closer to their own metropolitan regions.

Marrero cited leaders he met in Pennsylvania who said the Sands Casino “does not play a role in spreading economic development in the region.” He also noted that Lehigh Valley region’s high rate of population growth in recent years, projected to continue in the current decade, stands in contrast to relatively flat growth in the Pioneer Valley.

Marrero also expressed concerns about the timeline of the casino process in Holyoke.

Lehigh Valley officials, he said, took a course of several years to discuss potential casino developments, visiting communities with casinos across the country and building partnerships with their own local arts, business and educational organizations.

“It is questionable whether we would have the opportunity to replicate such efforts locally by the Phase II deadline without compromising other planning efforts in the community and/or other items on the City’s economic development agenda,” Marrero wrote to the mayor.

Morse this week told The Republican and MassLive.com that the trip to Pennsylvania and Marrero’s memo played a role in his decision to return to an anti-casino stance. It became clear during the trip, Morse said, that the conditions that made a casino a successful bet for Bethlehem were not present in Holyoke: "It didn't take long to realize that any potential benefit was not worth it."

A visit to the gaming floor of the casino, Morse said, also made an impression: “(It) was nothing short of an incredibly depressing site to see. It was clear Holyoke could do better.”

While initially encouraged by Suher’s apparent commitment to downtown investment as part of a casino deal, Morse said, he concluded that a Mountain Park casino and a revitalized downtown were “incompatible visions of the city" and locating a casino on the outskirts of the city would be “incompatible with a vibrant Downtown Holyoke.”

Morse also reiterated that he would not support a casino for downtown Holyoke. “I'd rather focus on a long-term, sustainable approach to economic development,” he said.

http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2013/01/documents_trace_holyoke_mayor.html

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Holyoke: Putting an Adolescent in Office




Holyoke Mayor Alex Morse, in another U-turn, drops pursuit of casino
12/13/2012


In another dramatic U-turn, Holyoke Mayor Alex Morse has killed potential casino developments in his city, a month after he shocked supporters by reversing a longtime anticasino stance and announcing he was open to a gambling resort.

Two casino development groups responded with applications to build in Holyoke. Morse will refund grants the groups paid to help the city study the plans.

“Today, I am halting all consideration of casino development in the city of Holyoke,” Morse said in a statement. “A casino may be coming to our area, but it will not be coming here.”

Morse’s flip last month from casino opponent to potential supporter brought a hail of criticism, and he apologized Thursday.

“At a time when our community needs unity of purpose, a yearlong debate over locating a casino within our borders will only sow division and discord,” Morse said. “In retrospect, I should have foreseen this sort of division, and I apologize for introducing it. Initializing this process was a mistake and I accept that responsibility.”

Morse was elected last year at age 22 on an anticasino platform, beating incumbent Mayor Elaine Pluta, who favored bringing a gambling resort to Holyoke. The casino issue was one of the strongest contrasts between the candidates, and many members of the anticasino groups in the city had campaigned on Morse’s behalf.


http://www.boston.com/metrodesk/2012/12/13/holyoke-mayor-alex-morse-another-turn-drops-pursuit-casino/KWMLp95pmNvVOmrTz3bdOI/story.html

Thursday, December 13, 2012

The Adolescent Mayor Of Holyoke Wakes Up


The Mayor of Holyoke who was elected based upon his Casino Opposition...Oh! Wait!

His Casino Support....Then his Casino Oposition......




has finally experienced an exorcism....of sorts....



Perhaps you can only claim credit for generating a great deal of karmic energy (since I haven't yet delivered the many, many petition signatures to the Mayor or Commissioner Crosby -- though perhaps they caught wind of your protests). Nevertheless, Mayor Alex Morse has come to his senses and decided AGAINST any casino in Holyoke.

Please see his December 13th statement at:

www.scribd.com/doc/116733440/Alex-Morse-Dec-13-statement-on-Holyoke-casino-proposals

I think credit is due the Mayor for taking the brave and embarassing step of eating his words, and erasing his short-sighted (but blessedly short-lived) turnaround. I hope you will thank him for his decision, and wish him the best and offer to help in bringing real economic development to the beautiful City of Holyoke: Development which enhances and does not destroy his community's (and our region's) remarkable natural resources.

Now if we can only get those communications towers removed, and finish off, once and for all, the idea that any development, including commercial wind power, is appropriate for endangered species habitat in one of the most scenic places in New England.

And speaking of karma, the password for this petition referred to Terry Blunt. Let's thank our late friend once again for working so hard and so long on protecting and expanding the natural areas of Mount Tom and the Connecticut River Valley. I am sure he'd be very relieved to see this latest threat evaporate.

Bless you all, happy holidays, and keep your voices raised for Mother Earth!

Gerrit Stover, Northampton



Is there any reason why government can't make decisions based on FACTS? Based on the Community Destruction that accompanies Predatory Gambling? the increased crime? the family destruction? the destruction of local businesses? low wage jobs?

Thank you Mayor Morse for waking up!

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Alex speaks


Alex, I am your faaah-thaa...






Holyoke Mayor Alex Morse: 'It's possible' no city casino proposal will meet criteria
By Mike Plaisance, The Republican
on December 11, 2012



HOLYOKE — The process to consider casino proposals Mayor Alex B. Morse has laid out calls for developers to present casino proposals here Dec. 20 or 21, but it was unclear late Monday whether the process will last that long.

Morse didn't appoint an advisory committee, to which developers are supposed to present their casino proposals, as planned on Monday. With 21 people having submitted letters of interest by Friday to be on the panel, Morse said, he instead will need until late this week to decide on 12 to 14 people for the committee.

In discussing the Dec. 20 or 21 deadline, Morse also said that there might not be a casino proposal that meets the standards he has stipulated. A 14-point set of city-level criteria was outlined in a Nov. 28 letter to potential casino developers.

The decision could be not to go forward with a gaming resort plan and not seek the one Western Massachusetts casino license that the state Gaming Commission will issue, he said.

"It's possible," Morse said.
Morse made similar remarks about the possibility that no casino plan will go forward here at a Nov. 26 press conference on his change of heart on the casino process.

Asked Monday if he would be continuing with the casino evaluation process at all, Morse wrote in an email, "I haven't made any decisions at this time."

"On the 26th (of November), I announced that I was considering this issue, and that is what I am doing," Morse wrote.

Morse has sustained a torrent of criticism for his Nov. 26 announcement that he had changed course and would consider casino plans. Supporters who said they voted for him in November 2011 specifically because he wouldn't approve of a casino, particularly in Ward 7, were angry. They jeered Morse at a press conference and in later MassLive.com reader comments and letters to the editor with cries he betrayed and lied to them.

Morse said changing from not wanting to consider casino proposals to welcoming them was an acceptance of reality. A major impact on the city from a casino is inevitable, with two casino proposals in Springfield and one in Palmer being considered. That means it makes sense for Holyoke to have an active say in the process, he said.

"At the moment we are vetting the candidates who expressed interest in being on my community committee," Morse wrote in an email. "I will keep you posted on the process and our decisions, but at the moment we are still considering all options."

Marcos A. Marrero, director of the city Office of Planning and Economic Development, is still compiling findings from a trip Morse, Marrero and other officials took to Bethlehem, Pa., to see the impact of a casino on that area, Morse said.

Also, Marrero met last week with groups proposing casinos here, he said.

"We are still deliberating the facts," Morse said.

Paper City Development, a limited liability company, has proposed a casino at Wyckoff Country Club, which is along Interstate 91 and on the Mount Tom Range.

Also on the Mount Tom Range, entertainment venue owner Eric Suher wants to put a gaming resort at Mountain Park, which he owns.

Wyckoff and Mountain Park are in Ward 7, and the possibility of a casino opening on the mountain has prompted backlash against Morse from casino foes.

Morse made clear at the Nov. 26 press conference that he would prefer that a casino not be an issue that must be addressed.

"My views on casinos have not changed and neither has my belief that the casino is unequivocally not our saving grace," he said then.

Also, he said, if developers fail to meet his criteria for a casino resort, "no deal will be signed."

http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2012/12/holyoke_mayor_alex_morses_casi.html


Criteria here:
Holyoke casino documents: Deadline looms for prospective developers to deliver $25,000 'grant' to city; Mayor Alex Morse calls for 'Community Committee'

Friday, December 7, 2012

No casino on Mount Tom


Please join with others by adding your name to oppose this wrong-headed decision by Holyoke Mayor Alex Morse [click on link below]:



No casino on Mount Tom

By Gerrit Stover (Contact)

To be delivered to: Alex Morse, Mayor of the City of Holyoke and Stephen Crosby, Chair, Massachusetts Gaming Commission

Petition Statement
 
Mount Tom is an irreplaceable natural and economic resource for all of the Connecticut River Valley. Please reject any and all inappropriate developments -- such as the two casino plans -- for this treasure.


Petition Background

Once again, Mount Tom -- not only an icon of the Connecticut River Valley but one of Massachusetts' most important natural areas -- is being treated as a potential site for intensive commercial development.

Multi-story, brightly-lit buildings and overwhelming traffic should never despoil this keystone of the area's landscape, outdoor recreation, wildlife corridor, and rare species habitat -- a decades-long focus of local, state, federal, and non-profit land conservation efforts.


Casinos are a blight on the landscape and a scourge to our citizens. A wasteful pastime that ruins families and creates hardships for many. Mt. Tom is irreplaceable and a recreational treasure that MUST be preserved for future generations. I grew up hiking, skiing and recreating on Mt. Tom and even though I live 5 hours away from my hometown of Holyoke, I still climb the mountain and enjoy its views and ambiance. I strongly urge the Mayor and citizens to Stop this Casino plan!


http://signon.org/sign/no-casino-on-mount-tom?source=c.em.cp&r_by=6328645

Sunday, December 2, 2012

In Holyoke, a Shakespearean saga unfolds

No one says it better than my favorite nosy neighbor:



In Holyoke, a Shakespearean saga unfolds

By Joanna Weiss

“This is political suicide,” declares Gordon Alexander, 50, a first-term city councilman who ran on a platform similar to Morse’s, including staunch opposition to a casino. “And I don’t understand why you would commit political suicide when your political career has 60 years in front of it.”

This is one thing Holyoke agrees on: Alex Morse, now 23, has electric prospects. He swept into office in 2011, straight out of Brown University, beating the incumbent in part because he vowed to fight a proposed Hard Rock casino in downtown Holyoke. But he also won because he represented civic pride, the prospect that Holyoke — led by an idealistic native son — could transform from a downtrodden mill town to a post-industrial gem.

Year one brought some successes and some bumps. Morse touts an early literacy program and an effort to boost the creative economy. He says he’s proud of using political levers to establish a needle-exchange program to help curb disease among the city’s many IV drug users.

That program caused its own political drama: Morse and his lawyers decided they could establish it through a quiet Board of Health vote, without taking the issue to the City Council. Now, the council is suing. Alexander, who supports the concept of needle exchange, said it’s an example of how Morse has sometimes botched the governing process, and reneged on his campaign promise of transparency.

Transparency, it turns out, is one reason Morse said he has to consider this casino. When he was running for office, he said, the state’s casino law hadn’t yet passed. Once it did, he said “as mayor, I need to take the blinders off.”

Gambling is coming to Western Massachusetts, Morse said. Borders are permeable; a casino in Springfield, with its attendant social ills, would be only 15 minutes away. A casino inside Holyoke would at least bring tax revenue, he said. And with its own proposal on the table, Holyoke can exert more influence on the state’s decision makers. [Perverted logic!]

So when a local printing and nightlife mogul, who had purchased a land at the foot of Mt. Tom, appeared with a plan for a gaming resort, “I could have easily said ‘no’ and shut the door,” Morse told me. “But then no one in the community would ever know that I had seen a plan with an investment that size.”

Morse insists that he hasn’t endorsed the plan yet, and will reject it if it doesn’t meet the city’s needs. He points out that a casino would still require a citywide vote.

Casino opponents — previously known as Morse’s base — repeat arguments they say Morse made himself during his campaign: that casinos create low-wage jobs and kill downtowns, that tax revenues would be offset by other costs, that the very process of considering a casino sows division. Lyn Horan, of the group Citizens for a Better Holyoke, fears that the energy consumed by a casino debate could put the rest of Morse’s vision on hold.

“There’s a small percentage of me,” Horan told me, “who cared about him, who believed in him, that hopes against all hope that I’m wrong about him. That there's something that I don’t know that is forcing him to be closed-mouth, forcing him to make this action.”

That’s what’s most Shakespearean about this saga: It’s about ideals, expectations, the hope people place on a politician who looks like a dream. (I won’t bother to point out the parallels on the state and national stage.) Is Morse, who faces reelection next fall, being a true leader, making tough choices regardless of the consequences? Or was the previous mayor — who showed up, smiling, at Monday’s press conference — right about him all along?

“Alex, who was cast by his opponents as the young kid who needs to grow up before he starts running the city, looks all the more like the young kid who needs to grow up before he starts running the city,” Alexander said.

Certainly, he’s growing up now, learning to manage adversity. He answered every question at the press conference (Alexander praises him for that, too). Morse says he slept well that night — in part, because he was tired. Being mayor isn’t easy, even on the easy days.

“In this job, you have to learn to go home and remind yourself that you’re a person and a human like everybody else,” Morse told me. “I live here. I’m a Holyoker. I have friends here, I have family here, and I happen to be the mayor.”

For another year, at least. I can’t wait to see what happens next.

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Ameristar pulls out of Springfield casino race



From: Bill Kearney

Do you think Ameristar pulled out because I made them aware of the provision that is in the Massachusetts gaming law that makes all casino operators mail their patrons who are enrolled in their reward card programs casino monthly statements. Those card holders account for 85 to 90% of a casinos patron base. Who knows how many casino patrons will curb their casino gambling spending and even quit casino gambling when being made aware month after month of their wins and mostly losses. Hopefully the other casino operators who I've made aware of this provision will do the same. 



Ameristar pulls out of Springfield casino race

By Dave Wedge
Friday, November 30, 2012
 
The crowded field of competitors for a western Massachusetts casino has gotten a bit smaller as Ameristar has pulled out of its plans for a nearly $1 billion gaming palace in Springfield, officials said.

Ameristar was planning a 500-room hotel, spa and casino with thousands of slots and gaming tables just off Intersate 91, but scrapped the plans today because the company was not confident it could win city approval, officials said.

Springfield officials had been considering casino plans from Ameristar, MGM International and Penn National and will pick one or more proposals to send to the state for consideration for the sole western Massachusetts gaming license. Springfield Mayor Domenic Sarno lamented the loss of one of the competitors but was confident Springfield will still land a world-class gaming resort.

“Obviously the city is very disappointed in Ameristar’s decision to withdraw from the competition,” Sarno said in a statement. “Ameristar made a strong proposal for an exciting project that would have given our voters a clear choice as to the type of location that would best serve the city.”

“Nonetheless, I am confident that the proposals of MGM and Penn Gaming will create a robust competition,” he added.

The news comes as Holyoke has re-emerged as a potential gaming site. The city’s mayor, Alex Morse, recently did an about-face on gaming and said he’s in talks with Iron Horse Entertainment for a possible casino at the former Mountain Park amusement park.

Paper City Development, which had been working on a proposal for Springfield with Hard Rock International, is also interested in negotiating a deal for a casino in Holyoke, in light of Morse’s flip-flop. Paper City officials today paid a $25,000 fee to Holyoke to cover costs related to the city’s consulting expenses, a company official said. Mohegan Sun is also proposing a casino in nearby Palmer.

In another development closer to Boston, Las Vegas gambling tycoon Steve Wynn, who is mulling a casino for Everett, has asked state gaming officials for a meeting to discuss the application process, according to Massachusetts Gaming Commission spokeswoman Elaine Driscoll.

Wynn’s proposal for a site off Route 99 along the Mystic River would compete with a proposed $1 billion gaming mecca at Suffolk Downs. Suffolk Downs has already paid the state a non-refundable $400,000 preliminary application fee.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1061178535&pos=breaking