Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Holliston. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Holliston. Show all posts

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Towns to form anti-casino coalition



Towns to form anti-casino coalition

By Jessica Trufant/Daily News staff
Posted Apr 24, 2013

473230 MA_MD_milfordcasino1.jpg
Shane Gerardi/for Wicked Local and Daily News



Facing a classic David versus Goliath scenario, several small towns opposed to having a casino in the neighborhood are seeking strength in numbers – about 58,000 residents worth.

More than a dozen officials from Medway, Holliston, Ashland and Hopkinton met Wednesday night at Holliston Town Hall to discuss drafting an inter-municipal agreement for confronting the proposed Milford casino.

Town administrators and several selectmen from each of the four towns took a firm stance against the casino and agreed to form the Metrowest Anti-Casino Coalition

If the agreement is solidified, the towns will pool money for expenses like impact studies or attorneys to assist in the battle against or mitigation of the $1 billion resort-casino proposed by FCX LLC at the intersection of I-495 and Rte. 16.

"We recognize that this development will have a much bigger footprint than one individual town," said Holliston selectmen Chairman Jay Marsden.

While Holliston and Hopkinton have already joined forces, Medway and Ashland officials plan to review it before meeting again in May.

"It’s easy to roll over one town. It’s much harder to roll over us as towns collectively," Hopkinton selectmen Chairman Benjamin Palleiko said. "Collectively, we’re all going to be better if we do this together. We share the costs. We share the burdens."

Foxwoods on April 8 outlined for Milford selectmen plans for the 300,000-square-foot casino, but officials were disappointed at the proposal's lack of details, given the tight timeframe from the Massachusetts Gaming Commission that calls for a community vote in October.

Medway Selectman Dennis Crowley questioned whether joining the coalition and supplying money would be "chasing a red herring," since he does not believe the Milford proposal with go forward.

"What are the chances that it’s going to happen in Milford? We have water problems. We have sewer problems. We have no transportation at all, and there’s no political strength," Crowley said.

While Hopkinton and Holliston officials acknowledged that the proposal may never come to fruition, the threat of a casino and its potential problems warrant the funding.

"My problem is as we sit in these chairs, we’re all responsible if we don’t take action," Palleiko said.

"We can’t afford to sit back and, no pun intended, roll the dice."

The proposal recently raised more concern for officials when Foxwoods joined the proposal, and David Nunes, the original applicant, alerted Milford that he would no longer be active in any negotiations with the town on behalf of the casino proposal.

Despite still holding the largest share in the partnership, Nunes said he has been "stripped of his authority and title," according to a letter he sent Milford Town Administrator Richard Villani earlier this month.

Medway officials agreed to put forth $25,000 of the $40,000 annual Town Meeting on May 13 will consider allocating for casino expenses.


Read more: http://www.milforddailynews.com/news/x1973693669/Towns-to-form-anti-casino-coalition#ixzz2RWfG0MUp

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

CasinoFreeMilford Meeting March 14th




Subject: CasinoFreeMilford Meeting March 14th
 
Hi All,
I would like to thank everyone for signing the petition. We are very close to 2,000 signatures.
Also,I would like to invite everyone to what I am sure will be a very informative evening.
We have been in touch with Stephanie Crimmins and Ginny Coppola from Foxboro.
Stephanie started the No Foxboro Casino movement in Foxboro. She was instrumental in defeating the casino proposal in Foxboro. Ginny Coppola is a selectwoman for the town of Foxboro and she has experience as a State Representative.
Both would like to present the information that they have learned as a result of hard work and perseverance.
There is no doubt in my mind that there will be something for everyone.
Bring a friend.
The event will be held on Thursday March 14th at 7 pm.
Adams Middle School Auditorium
323 Woodland St
Holliston MA
This message is from Casino-Free Milford who started the petition "Neighbors for a Casino-Free Milford," which you signed on Change.org.
 
 
 
 

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Milford: Dragging the Swamps for this Duo?

A 'developer' with experience even Nevada doubted, a Tribe that simply defaulted on its debt and a community that can't support the impacts.
 
It simply doesn't get any better than the Nunes/Foxwoods/Milford combo.



Milford group organizes to oppose casino

By Ellen Ishkanian
Globe Correspondent / February 9, 2013
 
Milford residents ready to fight a planned casino in their community met last week with people from Holliston and Hopkinton who have been organizing against the proposal for the past year.

The message from those already working on defeating the proposed $850 million “destination casino” on vacant land off Interstate 495, northwest of Route 16, was loud and clear: It’s Milford’s time to be heard.

Some in the fledgling group of about 12 people from Milford said the small number who showed up at the informal meeting belies the opposition the proposal will face.

“I’ve lived here my whole life and I’m ready to fight, and so are a lot of other people,” said Elaine Pagucci, who lives about a mile from the proposed casino site.
 
Milford resident Jim Flanagan, who said he lives five houses from where the casino is being proposed, is also on board.

“This is a residential neighborhood; it’s just not the place for it,” he said.

Colorado developer David Nunes and his company, Crossroads Massachusetts LLC, met the state’s Jan. 17 deadline for filing an application — accompanied by the $400,000 fee — with minutes to spare, setting into motion a process that will determine whether his proposal will be selected by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission to receive the single resort casino license reserved for Eastern Massachusetts.
 
The Milford proposal is competing against applications from Suffolk Downs, in partnership with Caesars Entertainment, in East Boston and Revere, and from Wynn Resorts, founded by Las Vegas casino magnate Steve Wynn, who is looking at industrial land in Everett.
 
In Milford, casino proponents say there could be significant advantages to allowing the proposal, including an estimated $8 million to $10 million in annual tax revenue and the creation of hundreds of jobs. Proponents also say the project would attract people to the area who would patronize already established businesses.
 
Barry Feingold, president and chief executive of the Milford Area Chamber of Commerce, said he is excited by the potential boost to the region’s economic development from an $800 million investment in the community. [Where has it ever? Someone's imbibing in too much Casino KoolAid!]

 

But, he said, it is way too early in the process to take a firm position on whether the pros will outweigh the cons.

“It’s going to be up to the people of Milford, and I think their sentiments right now mirror that of the Board of Selectmen, which is that we really need to get more information before we can make a decision on this,” said Feingold, who did not attend last week’s meeting.

He said his sense, as someone who speaks with business leaders and residents every day, is that the people of Milford are pretty evenly divided on the project.



“I talk to people on both sides,” he said.
 
Feingold said the proposed access ramp linking Interstate 495 with the casino site is a must before the project could get his endorsement, and the resort’s effect on town services will have to be weighed against the jobs and revenue that would come into the area.

“This is a huge project, there will certainly be hundreds of people hired just to build it,” he said.
Opponents at last week’s meeting said they plan to mobilize to defeat it at the polls.

“Milford is the host community; Milford has to say no,” said John Seaver, a lifelong town resident and former member of the Board of Selectmen. “Area towns need to support the effort, but the focus and the face of the opposition now needs to be Milford.”

While work has been done behind the scenes by a Holliston-based group, Casino-Free Milford, including setting up a website and Facebook page, gathering e-mail contacts, and organizing a petition drive, it was hoped the effort would be unnecessary.

But the last-minute decision by Nunes to move forward with his plans means those opposed have about eight months to prepare before a townwide vote in Milford could be held to decide the project’s fate.

“Nothing was serious until Nunes spent the $400,000,’’ Holliston Selectman John D. Leary Jr. told last week’s gathering. “Now is the time to get the organization started. We’re here to give the people of Milford the help they need, but you don’t have a month, you need to get started with weekly meetings.”

Milford’s Board of Selectmen could end the project before it even gets to a town vote, as was the case in Foxborough, where selectmen voted against entering into negotiations with Wynn, who with New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft had proposed building a casino on land across Route 1 from Gillette Stadium.

But Milford Selectman Brian W. Murray, the board’s chairman, who attended but did not speak at the informal meeting, said it is too early to make any decisions on whether the plan should move forward.

“That’s a premature question, because there is no proposal before the town,” he said.
Murray said he is still waiting to see whether Nunes will pass the first phase of the process, which is a check of his finances and background.
 
“We haven’t been presented any financial information," he said. “There’s nothing there yet, it’s basically just gathering information.”

The Milford residents and those from neighboring towns at the meeting are not counting on selectmen to stop the project. Instead, they say, they are ready to sway voters.

“The most important thing is not the selectmen,” Seaver said. “We need to keep the focus on the referendum and the five or six thousand voters who will decide this.”

Seaver said he will be a part of a core group that will meet biweekly to organize against the proposal, building grass-roots support through e-mail chains and by word of mouth, preparing for what he thinks will be an eventual vote on a proposal next fall.

He said fund-raising will be done to purchase more lawn signs, produce fliers, and buy advertisements, but utilizing social media and old-fashioned door-to-door campaigning will be the focus.

“This is not about whether or not you are pro or con gambling; that horse is out of the barn,” said
Holliston resident John Vosburg, land manager for the New England Mountain Bike Association, which owns land next to the proposed casino site. “This is about the location, and speaking with a common voice saying that this isn’t the place for a casino.”

Arguments against the proposal will likely focus on the proposed site’s location in the middle of a neighborhood of single-family homes, a casino’s effect on local property values, traffic, and ground water, and its toll on police and fire departments, schools, and other town services.

“Everyone assumes [the license] will go to Boston, but we have to hope for the best and plan for the worst,” Ken Rockett, a spokesman for Casino-Free Milford, told the meeting. “We’re here tonight to plan for the worst.’’

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2013/02/10/some-milford-residents-say-they-will-mobilize-against-casino-proposal/LJ3NYKkPMxAmTbXsKQmDQJ/story-1.html
 
Ellen Ishkanian can be reached at eishkanian@gmail.com.end of story marker


Foxwoods jumps into fray for eastern Mass. casino

By STEPHEN SINGER
Associated Press / February 11, 2013
 
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Connecticut’s Foxwoods Resort Casino has joined the race to open a casino in eastern Massachusetts.

CEO Scott Butera told The Associated Press on Monday that it is working with real estate developer David Nunes to compete for a casino in Milford, about 40 miles west of Boston.
 
Building a casino just 70 miles from Foxwoods in southeast Connecticut will not lead to destructive competition between the two casinos, but help bring in customers in Connecticut and Massachusetts, which ‘‘will hopefully lead to growth in both markets,’’ he said.
 
Butera and Nunes have known each other for years, and Nunes ‘‘reached out to me some time ago,’’ Butera said. Nunes already has reached an agreement with the town of Milford to build an $850 million resort casino.

Foxwoods, the largest casino in the Western Hemisphere, is the right partner because it’s the most familiar with the New England gambling market, Nunes said.
 
‘‘To me it was a no-brainer in terms of attracting the best company to manage the operation for us,’’ he said.

The Nunes venture, Crossroads Massachusetts, will compete for the eastern Massachusetts resort casino license with Suffolk Downs in Boston and Steve Wynn, who has proposed a casino for Everett.

‘‘I don’t think the competition is as daunting now that we have Foxwoods on board,’’ Nunes said.
 
Butera would not disclose how much Foxwoods would invest in the Massachusetts venture, only that ‘‘we’re making a substantial commitment.’’

Revenue at Foxwoods and its Connecticut rival, the Mohegan Sun, has been under tremendous pressure for several years as consumers pulled back spending on entertainment in the recession and weak recovery that followed and because of rising casino competition in the Northeast.
 
Butera said Foxwoods is not counting on a strong recovery in the economy, which has so far been anemic.
 
‘‘Certainly, we hope for that,’’ he said. ‘‘If that happens, we'll have a very strong project that will do quite well. We’re planning for very moderate growth.’’

Mohegan Sun also has been working to get a foothold in Massachusetts. The casino, which is run by the Mohegan tribe, has been courting Palmer officials and residents in advance of its application for a state permit to open a casino in western Massachusetts.

The Mashantuckets agreed last year to restructure $2.2 billion in debt. Bond holders received new securities with lengthened maturity dates and holders of subordinated special revenue obligations receive new debt at a discount to face value of accrued principal and interest.
 
Butera has said increased gambling competition was forcing Foxwoods to shift its business to include more nongambling enterprises such as retail and conferences.

Separately, Springfield Mayor Domenic Sarno announced on Monday that he would negotiate host community agreements with MGM Resorts International and Penn National Gaming, which have proposed casino developments for the western Massachusetts city.

The decision follows a review process and could result in Springfield voters choosing from two casino proposals. Under the state’s casino gambling law, any host community agreement that is reached between a city and a developer must be approved by voters.

MGM Resorts International has proposed a resort casino and entertainment complex in downtown Springfield. Penn National Gaming, in partnership with Peter Pan Bus Lines chairman Peter Picknelly, has proposed one in the city’s North End.

Hard Rock International, which has plans for a casino resort at the Eastern States Exhibition in West Springfield, also hopes to compete for the western Massachusetts license.

Foxwoods jumps into fray for eastern Mass. casino - News - Boston ...

Monday, June 4, 2012

Milford: Boston Globe didn't do homework!


The Massachusetts Gambling Commission will adopt a 2-step process.

The first part of that process will require Gambling Investors to submit financial and background information. That process from advertising to completion will take + 9 months.

That 2-step process will eliminate unqualified candidates before major investments are required.  

David Nunes has no $$$$.

Bill Warner and Warner Gaming LLC has no $$$$. Warner's experience is ???? Paleeze! Station filed for bankruptcy.

This Boston Globe reporter has failed to even conduct a simple internet search that would have revealed the information at the bottom.  Please do your homework!





Residents keep door open for casino plan

Globe Staff / June 3, 2012   
 
Although a proposed Milford casino’s competition for a state license seems to be falling away, that hasn’t made the path for the Crossroads Resort any clearer.
Still, the lack of opposition from Milford residents might be the most telling indicator that the casino complex could indeed open someday along Interstate 495.

Last month, Las Vegas magnate Steve Wynn dropped plans for a casino next to Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, after candidates opposed to it were elected to the Board of Selectmen. And Boston native Sheldon Adelson, owner of the Venetian in Las Vegas, also recently confirmed that he would not pursue a casino license in Massachusetts.

David Nunes, the developer behind Crossroads, said neither announcement surprised him. He said he expected the Foxborough collapse all along.

“Those that follow this closely, as I have, realize Foxborough was going to be a tough sell,” he said. “When a community gets its back up, especially in New England, and says this is not what we want, you can pretty much take it to the bank.”

Such opposition — except from surrounding towns — has been essentially absent in Milford, where town leaders say their constituents are voicing openness to the idea. Residents of nearby communities, such as Holliston and Hopkinton, don’t get a vote. Milford’s referendum, still many months away, would be binding.

Crossroads’ biggest competition for the region’s casino license, Suffolk Downs in East Boston, might have an edge as an established gambling facility, but it also has more vocal opposition than the Milford project.

“The vast majority of people in Milford are pretty content to look at the situation and say: ‘It’s a business. If it comes forward, let’s evaluate it,’” said state Representative John Fernandes, a Democrat who represents Milford.



He said what happened in Foxborough is a good indication that the community really does get a voice.
“I think Foxborough may have given everybody the comfort level, ‘Yeah the statute does work,’ ” said Fernandes.

He also noted that even without opposition, there is still a long list of potential problems that have to be resolved for the Milford project to work.

Water is a question, he said, as is traffic, and the mitigation that any host community would require.
“I’ve always thought that these things are lightning in a bottle,” said Fernandes. “Irrespective of the competition, even if there was no competition, I think the proposal in Milford is a difficult one.”

Brian Murray, chairman of the Milford Board of Selectmen, said he is hearing from townspeople who say they are keeping an open mind on the casino proposal.

“I think mostly the people I’m talking to are favorable to the idea of looking at it,” he said. “Most of the folks I’ve been talking to or that stop me are open to the idea of examining it or considering it.”

Murray said he sees his role as making sure voters have a detailed proposal to consider before they go to the ballot box.

“I think I see the role now of the Board of Selectmen as trying to have this developer put forth the most comprehensive and complete proposal that he can, with enough evaluation on the town’s end so that the townspeople can have an informed vote on the issue,” he said.

It’s not clear yet how much detail Nunes — or any developer — will provide. Nunes said some information may be limited by competitive nature of the process, with one casino license up for grabs in Eastern Massachusetts.


“I think we’ll talk in general parameters,” he said.

The Crossroads proposal already shared with the town calls for an $850 million complex that would feature a 176,000-square-foot gambling floor, a 350-room hotel, and 60,000 square feet of restaurants and retail shops.

Nunes said he is focused on working out financing, and hopes to announce the entire team for his project in the next three to four months.

The only other partner that has been publicly announced is Bill Warner of Warner Gaming, which operates the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/06/03/milford_casino_lacks_opposition_but_still_has_a_long_road_ahead/

Lisa Kocian can be reached at lkocian@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @GlobeLisaKocian.


June 14, 2010 9:52 AM

Warner Gaming withdraws application to manage Greektown Casino Hotel



Two parties gain ownership, control of Hard Rock Hotel
By Chris Sieroty
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Posted: Feb. 24, 2011


Brookfield Asset Management Inc. and Warner Gaming LLC were granted ownership and operational control of the Hard Rock Hotel on Thursday after state gaming regulators approved their takeover plans.

...the foreclosure and bankruptcy of a Las Vegas hotel-casino.

The Hard Rock Hotel had been struggling to meet its obligations on $1.25 billion in debt. After the deal closes Tuesday, the Hard Rock will have a restructured debt obligation of $898 million.

Under the agreement, ownership of the property will transfer LVHR Casino Inc., a subsidiary of Brookfield, while management of the property will be transferred to Warner Gaming.


Gaming Commission Chairman Peter Bernhard expressed some concern over whether Warner Gaming has enough experience to manage the Hard Rock Hotel.

Warner Gaming founder William Warner assured the commission that his 14 years with Station Casinos Inc. prepared him for managing a property the size of the Hard Rock Hotel.
[Station went bankrupt!]



....rival developer David Nunes (left). Several years ago, he was something of a local hero to Milford. Now he’s on the verge of getting laughed out of town. Nunes has talked big ($700 million, 5,000 slots, etc.) but hasn’t flashed any cash, giving rise to skepticism amongst the selectmen. If the proposed design of Crossroads Casino looks like a rejected rendering that was fished out of a Station Casinos wastebasket, small wonder: mooted operator Warner Gaming is largely comprised of executive refugees from Station. (“Sunset Milford”? “Milford Station”?) Don’t expect Warner to rescue Nunes. It’s strictly a manager (primarily of Las Vegas‘ hard-luck Hard Rock Hotel & Casino, whose owner — Credit Suisse — was affiliated with the project three years ago). It’s not a financier. As for its design sensibility, I guess you can take the executive out of Station but you can’t Station out of the exec. 

http://dmckee.lvablog.com/?p=9103


Thursday, May 10, 2012

OK! Time for NO MILFORD VEGAS!

You gotta educate your Selectmen about the impacts of FREE ALCOHOL and drunk drivers, Gambling Addiction, and have you seen this?

...don’t call it economic development.




Milford casino plan moves forward as Foxborough proposal is dropped
By Derek McLean/Daily News staff
Posted May 10, 2012


Photos

phoMDexterior2_0510.jpg
contributed

This drawing shows what the outside of the casino proposed by developer David Nunes would look like in Milford.

phoMDexterior2_0510.jpg
phoMDcasino map_0510.jpg
phoMDcasinoplan_0510.jpg



With a proposal to build a resort casino in Foxborough coming to a halt on Tuesday, plans to build a Milford casino continue to move forward.

“I am optimistic that we will have a great team put together. That’s what I am working on now,” said Colorado-based developer David Nunes.

Nunes hopes to build a $700 million, 300,000-square-foot casino at the junction of Rte. 16 and Interstate 495.

Nunes said that he and his team are putting together a financing plan. He said when he makes his next announcement to selectmen, “We’re going to be set, ready to go and fully financed. There won’t be any questions about our capabilities.”

Patriots owner Robert Kraft and hotel magnate Steve Wynn decided to suspend plans for a $1 billion casino on Rte. 1 following Monday’s town election in Foxborough, in which two casino opponents were elected as selectmen.

Nunes said the suspension of the casino in Foxborough was anticipated by anyone who was close to what was going on with casinos in Massachusetts. He said with Foxborough out of the picture there is now going to be very limited competition to build a casino in eastern Massachusetts. The biggest competition is coming from developers who are eyeing the Suffolk Downs racetrack in East Boston as a potential casino site.

Milford Selectman William Buckley questions the seriousness of Nunes’ proposal. “They have done absolutely nothing since they engaged the town,” he said. “Anybody can put together a proposal, can put together drawings. The numbers is something I have not seen at this point.”

State Rep. John Fernandes, D-Milford, agrees. “David Nunes came in and made a preliminary proposal to the community to bring a casino in town. But nothing has been brought forward since.”
Fernandes said no casino in the state would move forward unless the people want it

. “I don’t think there is a need or want to build a casino in Milford,” he said. “There has been no expression that the residents of Milford want a casino.”

Buckley said that he would need to see the size of the casino before he can judge whether the town could handle its impact.

“I am prepared to listen,” he said.

Nunes said he has a unique opportunity in Milford because the town has on and off ramps to I-495 and no traffic issues. The plan also calls for a dedicated on and offramp from I-495 to the casino. He said because the plan is on the eastern side of the town, “after you build the on ramp you end up with a thousand acres of conservation, next to the town of Holliston, so the impact to the town as a whole is much, much, much smaller.”


The proximity to Holliston is a problem for Holliston Selectman Jay Marsden who said the proposed location has been squeezed into a certain area. He has doubts that the area would have the infrastructure to support a casino.

“There is already a lot of traffic there now. The roads aren’t built to be able to handle it,” he said.

Nunes said building the casino in Milford would help grow local businesses and provide the town with real estate tax payments. He also said it would create jobs locally, including casino and construction jobs.

But Marsden said neighboring Holliston would not receive those benefits. “Other than mitigation money there is no tax money coming our way,” he said. “There is more opportunities in this for the host town than there is for us.”

Still Marsden said Holliston would welcome the opportunity to speak to Milford and the developers about the possibility of a casino being built in the area.

“I would rather see it somewhere else,” said Todd Cestari, a Hopkinton selectman. He said the casino would not be good for the vitality of the town, which borders Milford to the north.

“It’s not adding to the culture of the area and we are very concerned about it,” he said.

Nunes’ proposal for a $700 million first phase would have 300 hotel rooms, a 125,000-square-foot gaming floor, shops, restaurants, surface parking and a five-story parking garage. The proposal says the project would initially create 3,000 jobs. The casino would ultimately expand to include 5,000 slots, 250 table games, several thousand hotel rooms and up to 13 restaurants.


Read more: http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/news/x1809313767/Milford-casino-plan-moves-forward-as-Foxborough-proposal-is-dropped#ixzz1uUAnVQzB

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Neighbors preparing case against Milford casino plan

Neighbors preparing case against Milford casino plan
By Ellen Ishkanian
Globe Correspondent

Residents in Holliston are preparing for a fight against a proposed casino along Interstate 495, just over the border in Milford, the way a defense or prosecution team would get ready for trial.

As about 45 town residents listened last week, Board of Selectmen chairman Jay Marsden outlined a strategy that will include small research groups working over the course of the next nine months to a year perfecting arguments showing how surrounding communities would be hurt by the proposed $850 million Crossroads Resort casino, hotel, and retail complex.

Page 2 of 2 --Many residents who attended last week’s strategy session in Holliston said they are willing to work on a committee.

“I’m absolutely ready,’’ said Marilyn Horn. The casino complex “will totally destroy Holliston if it is allowed to be built. We really have to do everything we can to keep this out of our area.’’

Residents also voiced frustration that while they will feel the impact of the development, they will have no direct say in the decision. The law stipulates that only residents of the city or town where the casino will be sited have the ability to approve or reject a proposal.

“It is totally unfair that we don’t get a vote in this. It is appalling,’’ Horn said.

Holliston officials said they are considering placing a nonbinding referendum question about the casino on the November presidential election ballot to gauge the level of opposition to the Milford proposal.

Nunes said he expects to present his final plans to the Milford Board of Selectmen and then Town Meeting over the next three to four months, to get their reaction before a vote goes before the town in a general election.

Other sites vying for the single casino license available between Boston and Worcester include Suffolk Downs in East Boston, and a proposed complex near Gillette Stadium in Foxborough.

The Board of Selectmen in Foxborough has already taken a vote indicating its opposition to a casino there, and the Planning Board in bordering Norfolk also voted unanimously to oppose the proposal.

While a vote in an adjacent town cannot stop a casino from being built, the Gaming Commission is required to consider relative support and opposition from neighboring communities. In addition, surrounding towns can ask the commission to require the developer to pay for additional studies to assess the impact of the proposal.

“Mitigation funds would pay the check for these services after the town presumably hired the consultant,’’ said state Representative Carolyn Dykema, a Holliston Democrat who opposed the casino legislation.

She said lobbying efforts on behalf of the casino industry and proposed casinos have already begun on Beacon Hill.

It may soon begin from the opposing side as well. Holliston Selectman Jay Leary said he has had conversations with elected officials from neighboring towns about getting together to hire a professional public relations or lobbying firm to spearhead the opposition effort.

But, Marsden cautioned, the research, mock trials, and meetings are taking place in preparation of something that may never happen.

If voters in Milford reject the casino plans or the developer decides against moving forward with the proposal for whatever reason, all the work will have been unnecessary.

“It’s a success if you never have to go to trial,’’ Marsden said.

The proposal’s developer, David Nunes, will have to make his case to the state Gaming Commission that the Milford site will boost jobs, development, and revenue in the area, Marsden said. “We have to go in and argue the other side,’’ he said.

“We have to make our case that this is a terrible location, and that it is not going to do what they say it will.’’

Over the next few weeks, Marsden said, a list of volunteers will be circulated by e-mail, working groups will be established, and research will begin. “We’ll put together presentations that address each issue, and we’ll go through a dry run, a mock trial, so to speak,’’ he said.

Nunes, however, said the final plans won’t be presented to the Milford Board of Selectmen for another three to four months.

“It’s hard to try and dispel something before there is a finalized plan and they see all the dynamics that are going into it,’’ he said in a telephone interview after the Holliston meeting.

Initial plans include a 176,000-square-foot gambling floor, a 350-room hotel, and 60,000 square feet of retail shops and restaurant space.

Marsden said a list of specific areas of concern to be researched is still being formulated, but many residents talked about how increased traffic would change the character of Holliston. They said drivers traveling from points east to gamble in Milford would clog an already heavily traveled Route 16.

Nunes, however, said the only access to the casino complex from Route 16 would be for emergency use. “Police and fire vehicles are the only ones that will be able to use that road,’’ he said.

The only public access to the complex, he said, would be from an offramp that would be added to I-495. He said he has already had conversations with officials from the state Department of Transportation’s Highway Division, the Federal Highway Administration, and congressional representatives.

“We know exactly how we are going to do this,’’ Nunes said.

The list of Holliston objections will go beyond Route 16 traffic concerns, however, and are expected to include the complex’s potential impact on water availability in a town reliant on wells, infrastructure, public safety, school enrollment, property values, the environment, and small area businesses.

Will Neighboring Opposition to a Casino Make a Difference?

What other Industry would require 'mitigation'? As the reality of the significant impacts of Predatory Gambling become apparent, opposition to this 24/7/365 Folly is growing.

Neighboring communities will suffer the degradation, traffic, increased crime, DRUNKS, GAMBLING ADDICTION and there really is no amount of money that will 'mitigate' those costs.

POLL: Will Neighboring Opposition to a Casino Make a Difference?
By Mary MacDonald
Residents and leaders of towns surrounding Milford have begun online petitions, and are planning methods to influence state gaming commission members, all in expectation of a casino proposal.

State legislation that will allow up to three casinos in Massachusetts did not give neighboring communities a vote in whether a gambling resort can locate in a community.

So, if Milford voters decide to endorse a casino proposal, voters in Grafton, Hopkinton, Upton and Holliston, among other communities, can't block it.

But they can try to head one off before it gets to that point, by making a case to the state Gaming Commission that the Milford proposal will not be beneficial.

Opponents who worry a casino proposal might become viable in Milford are stepping up their organizational efforts. As the Boston Globe reported this week, activists in Holliston have started grassroots efforts to build opposition to the casino, and make a factual case against it. The developer, David Nunes, has indicated a proposal could be presented to Milford selectmen within months.

Should people in surrounding communities accept that this decision is not theirs? Or should they push on, and build a case against it?

Friday, February 24, 2012

Neighbors preparing case against Milford casino plan

Neighbors preparing case against Milford casino plan
By Ellen Ishkanian
Globe Correspondent

HOLLISTON Residents in Holliston are preparing for a fight against a proposed casino along Interstate 495, just over the border in Milford, the way a defense or prosecution team would get ready for trial.

As about 45 town residents listened last week, Board of Selectmen chairman Jay Marsden outlined a strategy that will include small research groups working over the course of the next nine months to a year perfecting arguments showing how surrounding communities would be hurt by the proposed $850 million Crossroads Resort casino, hotel, and retail complex.

The proposal’s developer, David Nunes, will have to make his case to the state Gaming Commission that the Milford site will boost jobs, development, and revenue in the area, Marsden said. “We have to go in and argue the other side,’’ he said.

“We have to make our case that this is a terrible location, and that it is not going to do what they say it will.’’

Over the next few weeks, Marsden said, a list of volunteers will be circulated by e-mail, working groups will be established, and research will begin. “We’ll put together presentations that address each issue, and we’ll go through a dry run, a mock trial, so to speak,’’ he said.

Nunes, however, said the final plans won’t be presented to the Milford Board of Selectmen for another three to four months.

“It’s hard to try and dispel something before there is a finalized plan and they see all the dynamics that are going into it,’’ he said in a telephone interview after the Holliston meeting.

Initial plans include a 176,000-square-foot gambling floor, a 350-room hotel, and 60,000 square feet of retail shops and restaurant space.

Marsden said a list of specific areas of concern to be researched is still being formulated, but many residents talked about how increased traffic would change the character of Holliston. They said drivers traveling from points east to gamble in Milford would clog an already heavily traveled Route 16.

Nunes, however, said the only access to the casino complex from Route 16 would be for emergency use. “Police and fire vehicles are the only ones that will be able to use that road,’’ he said.

The only public access to the complex, he said, would be from an offramp that would be added to I-495. He said he has already had conversations with officials from the state Department of Transportation’s Highway Division, the Federal Highway Administration, and congressional representatives.

“We know exactly how we are going to do this,’’ Nunes said.

The list of Holliston objections will go beyond Route 16 traffic concerns, however, and are expected to include the complex’s potential impact on water availability in a town reliant on wells, infrastructure, public safety, school enrollment, property values, the environment, and small area businesses.

Many residents who attended last week’s strategy session in Holliston said they are willing to work on a committee.

“I’m absolutely ready,’’ said Marilyn Horn. The casino complex “will totally destroy Holliston if it is allowed to be built. We really have to do everything we can to keep this out of our area.’’

Residents also voiced frustration that while they will feel the impact of the development, they will have no direct say in the decision. The law stipulates that only residents of the city or town where the casino will be sited have the ability to approve or reject a proposal.

“It is totally unfair that we don’t get a vote in this. It is appalling,’’ Horn said.

Holliston officials said they are considering placing a nonbinding referendum question about the casino on the November presidential election ballot to gauge the level of opposition to the Milford proposal.

Nunes said he expects to present his final plans to the Milford Board of Selectmen and then Town Meeting over the next three to four months, to get their reaction before a vote goes before the town in a general election.

Other sites vying for the single casino license available between Boston and Worcester include Suffolk Downs in East Boston, and a proposed complex near Gillette Stadium in Foxborough.

The Board of Selectmen in Foxborough has already taken a vote indicating its opposition to a casino there, and the Planning Board in bordering Norfolk also voted unanimously to oppose the proposal.

While a vote in an adjacent town cannot stop a casino from being built, the Gaming Commission is required to consider relative support and opposition from neighboring communities. In addition, surrounding towns can ask the commission to require the developer to pay for additional studies to assess the impact of the proposal.

“Mitigation funds would pay the check for these services after the town presumably hired the consultant,’’ said state Representative Carolyn Dykema, a Holliston Democrat who opposed the casino legislation.
[What other business would require MITIGATION?]

She said lobbying efforts on behalf of the casino industry and proposed casinos have already begun on Beacon Hill.

It may soon begin from the opposing side as well. Holliston Selectman Jay Leary said he has had conversations with elected officials from neighboring towns about getting together to hire a professional public relations or lobbying firm to spearhead the opposition effort.

But, Marsden cautioned, the research, mock trials, and meetings are taking place in preparation of something that may never happen.

If voters in Milford reject the casino plans or the developer decides against moving forward with the proposal for whatever reason, all the work will have been unnecessary.

“It’s a success if you never have to go to trial,’’ Marsden said.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Repeal the Casino Deal

No one at this public meeting spoke in favor of a Slot Barn in their neighborhood.

Even the elected officials who foolishly championed this issue remained silent.

Public, Reps Discuss Plans for MetroWest Casino
Could a nearby casino complex impact Westborough?

By Justin Saglio

During the question and answer portion of the meeting, area residents spoke out against the casino and asked how to stop it from being implemented.

John Pibeiro, a Winthrop resident, asked the meeting's attendees to sign a petition to repeal November's legislation that permits casino gambling in the state.

"Why would you ever want something that requires mitigation?" Pibeiro
[Ribiero] asked.

"If in two years our property value tanks, what are we supposed to do?" Steve Guerrera, a Holliston resident asked.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Party Crasher?

In the most bizarre comment, Bobby Blair seems to have ignored that this was a public meeting that provided some misinformation that Mr. Ribiero attempted to correct.

Where in the Open Meeting Law is there a restriction on attendance solely by residents?

Sometimes, when you get mired in the glories of dollar bills being tossed around to satisfy every need and special interest, you overlook the facts.

One out-of-the-area casino opponent did seem to crash the party. John Ribeiro said he traveled all the way from Winthrop. Ribeiro is heading up a group to repeal the legislature's casino act. Ribeiro cited stats from Connecticut that showed local aid to host communties [sic] had not risen since the casinos arrived there.

Instead of encouraging local residents to organize, educate and collect their facts, elected officials placated the crowd in attendance with "Wait! We'll tell you when you can speak."

Instead of forming Resident Study Committees to calculate the costs and impacts, false assurances were offered that the Gambling Investors would provide the funds somewhere down the line and that they would have a voice.

The frustration of local residents was clearly expressed in conversations after the meeting.



CasiNo Forum
by Bobby Blair 1/26/12

Most of those who attended Thursday night's "not a gripe session" concerning proposed casinos in Massachusetts were from Holliston. Others attending by a show of hands were from Hopkinton and Ashland, a few each from Medway and Millis. Only several in the audience were from Milford one of the three prosposed sites in the eastern district. There will be three districts, the other two in our district being Foxboro and Suffolk Downs in Boston.

Organized by Holliston Board of Selectmen Jay Marsden (above right) State Senator Karen Spilka (left) told those attending "I don't know any other area in the state where a collabrative such as this is taking place this early in the process. Spilka thanked Marsden for organizing the forum. Spilka went on to outline the process which will take place from the state level on down. As the Chairwoman of the Senate Economic Development Committee, Spilka was at each step of the process before it was voted on by the legislature. Spilka voted against casinos but insured that surrounding communities for proposed casinos have a say in the process. Spilka outlined the process that Chapter 194 (an act establishing expanded gaming in the commonwealth) will now take.

Spilka noted that the process is still young, and while Governor Patrick has announced Stephen Crosby to head up the Gaming Commission, four others must be appointed by March 21st. Best practices for expanded gaming were taken from 38 other states who allow gaming. Timewise it could be 12-18 months before the Gaming Commission gets going, 18-24 months before the Commission receives bids from developers and yet another 1-24 months before the first casino is built. The minimum bid to build a casino is 500 million and 125 million for the only-slots parlor. There would be a one time license fee for casinos of 85 million and 25 million for a slots parlor.

While the state will realize a portion of the yearly revenues generated from casinos, those monies have already been designated to such purposes as local aid, community colleges, community mitigation and tourism. Rep. Carolyn Dykema spoke about regional and local mitigation boards and the safeguards and protection in Chapter 194 along with the impact on local facilities. Dykema, like her counterpart Spilka, voted against casinos.

In what was the only humorous moment of the night, David Bastille who lives on the Milford line near Washington Street told the audience that he had written a few notes but then realized one was a rant and the other a rave. He said the people of Milford are the elephants in the room while the residents of Holliston represent the rhinoceroses. "I now wished I had more friends who live in Milford." Bastille is an opponent of a casino in Milford and is the creator of the little "CasiNo" signs scattered about Holliston.

The audience was addressed by Rep. Tom Sannicandro and Ashland Selectman Jon Fetherston who is also a member of the MetroWest Regional Collabrative.

While not speaking during the forum, I asked Hopkinton Selectman Brian Herr (above left) what the feeling about the proposed casino was in his town. "The residents are very concerned and if I had to score it, I'd say 70% are against the casino and 30% in favor.

One out-of-the-area casino opponent did seem to crash the party. John Ribeiro said he traveled all the way from Winthrop. Ribeiro is heading up a group to repeal the legislature's casino act. Ribeiro cited stats from Connecticut that showed local aid to host communties had not risen since the casinos arrived there.

Residents will be notified as local legislators and municipal boards discuss and follow the process according to Selectman Jay Marsden.