Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label banning patrons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label banning patrons. Show all posts

Sunday, July 6, 2014

Self-Exclusion not a solution!






More people ban themselves at Ohio gambling sites

Associated Press
 
Published: July 5, 2014 - 07:59 PM
More than a thousand potential gamblers are now banning themselves from Ohio’s casinos and racinos as the state’s gambling industry expands.

The Ohio Casino Control Commission’s Voluntary Exclusion Program that began two years ago to help target problem gambling now includes more than 980 names, the Dayton Daily News reported.

The Ohio Lottery oversees operations at the state’s racinos, which feature horse racing tracks and slot machines. More than 200 names are on that list.

People can ban themselves for a year, five years or life.

The casino commission’s executive director, Mark Schuler, says those violating the voluntary ban can be charged with criminal trespassing and have their gambling winnings confiscated. The casinos have conducted 83 investigations of potential violators and 78 people have been charged with trespassing, he said.

Program violators have forfeited $28,552 in winnings, with the money going to the Problem Gambling Resource Fund.

Schuler said it isn’t impossible for someone on the banned list to return to a casino, but it is difficult.

“Our gaming agents at each facility are familiar with those who have enrolled and could observe them on the floor,” Schuler said. “The same thing is true for the security and surveillance personnel.

They have pictures of the individuals and it’s their job to be familiar with them.”

Experts say the program is a good step, but it probably only draws a small amount of problem gamblers.

“That’s probably a fraction of the percentage of people who have gambling disorder,” said Dr. Ryan Peirson, chief clinical officer for the Alcohol, Drug Addiction and Mental Health Services Board of Montgomery County.

Maryhaven, a comprehensive behavioral health facility in Columbus, specializes in treatment for addictive illness. Bruce Jones, who coordinates Maryhaven’s gambling intervention program, says the number of people seeking services there has nearly doubled since the casinos opened.

The four casinos and five racinos in Ohio are relatively new, and few statistics exist on gambling in the state. The first of Ohio’s casinos and racinos opened in 2012.

Neighboring Indiana has 13 casinos and more than 5,000 members in its voluntary exclusion program, according to the newspaper. More than 6,900 people in Pennsylvania have asked to be placed on that state’s self-exclusion list, and more than 3,400 people have signed up since 2001 for Michigan’s program, which offers only lifetime bans.
 
 
 
 
http://www.ohio.com/news/break-news/more-people-ban-themselves-at-ohio-gambling-sites-1.501933
 
 
 

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Horseshoe Lures Gambling Addict Back, Then Arrests Him



Gambler: Casino 'welched on bet,' then arrested him

Man says he was banned by Horseshoe, lured back under false pretenses


Written by
Kimball Perry





Jackie Harrison admits he’s addicted to gambling but knew he had a sure thing when he returned Aug. 9 to Horseshoe Casino Cincinnati after previously being banned.

Despite the ban – for a loud protest after Harrison said the casino cheated him – the casino invited him back and, when he returned, had him arrested and charged with trespassing.

“It wasn’t like I snuck in there. They invited me in,” said Harrison, a member of the casino’s Diamond Club that gets him extra benefits including vouchers for free gambling mailed to his home.

Jackie Harrison shows the come-ons he says Horseshoe Casino Cincinnati used to lure him back to the casino after he was banned. When he went to the casino to use the vouchers, he was arrested for criminal trespass.
Jackie Harrison shows the come-ons he says Horseshoe Casino Cincinnati used to lure him back to the casino after he was banned. When he went to the casino to use the vouchers, he was arrested for criminal trespass. / The Enquirer/Kimball Perry

A spokeswoman for the casino didn’t respond to Harrison’s allegations.

Harrison, a disabled U.S. Air Force veteran with COPD, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, is a regular casino patron. “I spend about $1,800 a month there,” Harrison, 59, said.

When he went to the casino’s craps tables July 3, he was on a roll. He was playing a game called “High Low” in which bettors win only if the dice come up snake eyes (two) or boxcars (12).

Harrison, who has been treated in the past for his gambling addiction, wasn’t throwing the dice.

Instead, he was placing bets on the throws of others.

He lost a few rounds but then won $450. He took $400 and instructed the casino table worker to let the remaining $50 ride on the next bet. A few rolls later, he won $750. He said he took $650 of that win and told the casino worker to place the remaining $100 on the next throw.

He won on that throw, too, and would have won $1,500, he said, but the casino worker who had just handed him $650 said Harrison hadn’t bet on that throw. Harrison, noting that he was given just $650 of the $750 he won, insisted he had – loudly.

“I was irate,” Harrison said. “I said, ‘You are gonna give me my money.’ They welched on a bet.”
He was escorted out of the casino to the public sidewalk where, he said, he ranted for about 30 minutes about how the casino cheated him.

That’s when, he said, the casino banned him.

“I stayed away because I knew they were serious,” Harrison said. He stayed away for four weeks.

That ended, though, after the casino mailed to Harrison’s home $150 in casino vouchers that allowed him to gamble there.

“That’s like sending crack to a crack addict and telling him not to smoke it,” Harrison said.

Confused, he went to the casino Aug. 9 and asked employees at the players’ reward counter about the offer, telling them he was unsure why he was getting them if he was banned from the casino.

“About five minutes later, she came out and said there was no ban, there were no red flags on me,” Harrison said. “They gave me a new (Players Club) card and put the money on my card.”

He gambled for about two hours, he said, before casino security had him arrested for criminal trespass. He told them he’d been invited in by the casino, was cleared by other workers and even given $100 with which to gamble.

He lost that argument when casino security called police, who arrested Harrison again for criminal trespass.

“They welched on that $1,500 bet and I think that’s what this is about,” Harrison said.

Harrison will be before Hamilton County Municipal Court Judge Ted Berry on the two criminal trespass charges Monday. Each criminal trespass case carries a maximum jail term of 30 days. ⬛


http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20130916/NEWS0107/309160033

Monday, September 9, 2013

Banned Casino Player Returns to Sands


Bill Kearney

Massachusetts ‘Gaming’ Future

Amongst thousands they can find with their high-tech surveillance cameras someone who was banned, but they don’t see the thousands who are gambling excessively day after day and week after week.

The Morning Call - August 22 - Sands Casino player evicted a second time...


It had been two years since his eviction, but Sands security didn't forget.

A New York man who was permanently evicted from Sands Casino was tossed from the Bethlehem gambling hall when he tried to return Wednesday night.

Chang Quan Chen, 64, of Brooklyn, was charged with trespassing just after 10 p.m. Wednesday. Chen's eviction gave a window into just how detailed the casino's surveillance can be. State police Trooper Robert Grossi said Chen wasn't committing a crime — other than returning to a casino he'd been banned from.

Yet a team of Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board officers in the second-floor booth staring at dozens of surveillance monitors on a floor where thousands of people were playing slot machines and table games recognized him as someone who had been banned in October 2011.

"He wasn't doing anything obvious, but they still found him," Grossi said. "Clearly, they're very, very good at what they do."

Grossi said it was not clear what Chen did in 2011 to get permanently banned.
 
 

 
 
 
 

Friday, August 23, 2013

If High-Tech Surveillance.....

...can detect a BANNED PLAYER, why are CASINOS accepting STOLEN/EMBEZZLED FUNDS?


Bill Kearney
Massachusetts ‘Gaming’ Future

Amongst thousands they can find with their high-tech surveillance cameras someone who was banned, but they don’t see the thousands who are gambling excessively day after day and week after week.
And sometimes spending money that is not theirs!

The Morning Call - August 22 - Sands Casino player evicted a second time...


It had been two years since his eviction, but Sands security didn't forget.

A New York man who was permanently evicted from Sands Casino was tossed from the Bethlehem gambling hall when he tried to return Wednesday night.

Chang Quan Chen, 64, of Brooklyn, was charged with trespassing just after 10 p.m. Wednesday. Chen's eviction gave a window into just how detailed the casino's surveillance can be. State police Trooper Robert Grossi said Chen wasn't committing a crime — other than returning to a casino he'd been banned from.

Yet a team of Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board officers in the second-floor booth staring at dozens of surveillance monitors on a floor where thousands of people were playing slot machines and table games recognized him as someone who had been banned in October 2011.

"He wasn't doing anything obvious, but they still found him," Grossi said. "Clearly, they're very, very good at what they do."

Grossi said it was not clear what Chen did in 2011 to get permanently banned.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sunday, May 5, 2013

Banning Gambling Addicted Patrons



More locals, foreigners banned from MBS, Genting casinos





More than 15,600 were issued third-party exclusion orders for the 10 months leading to March, taking the total to 43,519, about 11/2 times the 27,882 at the end of May last year.

The Straits Times
Saturday, May 04, 2013

SINGAPORE - The increase came largely as a result of some 15,000 people being banned by the Government because they were receiving financial aid from the Ministry of Social and Family Development's (MSF) ComCare, or had defaulted on the Housing Board's rental payments.

http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20130504-420295.html



Saturday, March 23, 2013

La. casinos seize $800,000 for owed child support

In other words, Gambling Addicts are allowed to lose money that casinos don't have to return.
Good advertising campaign!

Maybe some day states will have the sense to ban them.

La. casinos seize $800,000 for owed child support


Angel Pellegrin plays a video poker machine Friday at Jack's in Houma.
Benjamin Oliver Hicks/Staff


Published: Friday, March 8, 2013 at 6:35 p.m.

The state's casino interception program captured more than $806,000 in casino winnings in 2012 from non-custodial parents owing child support payments.
 
Amelia Belle Casino in Morgan City seized nearly $50,000 for the program. State law allows casinos to collect child support from people who win more than $1,200.
 
Hollywood Casino in Baton Rouge seized the most — $106,771 — of the state's 18 non-Indian casinos.
 
Louisiana Department of Children and Family Services officials said the program has been a successful tool in collecting overdue support.
 
“In our work to assist families who rely on court-ordered child support to provide for their children, DCFS uses every avenue available, like casino intercepts, to collect the more than $1.2 billion owed by non-custodial parents statewide,” said DCFS Secretary Suzy Sonnier in a statement.
 
Former Sen. Nick Gautreaux introduced the legislation in 2010, and Gov. Bobby Jindal signed the bill that year. Casinos run the gambler's name through a child support database to see if any money is owed.
 
Other states with similar laws include Mississippi, Indiana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Colorado and West Virginia.
 
Reece Middleton, executive director of the Louisiana Association on Compulsive Gambling, said he sees the benefits of the program, but it might also be an administrative burden on casinos.
 
“Who would stand up and be against this and say, ‘Well, we want people to use welfare money in our casinos that's intended for the DCFS'? You just don't say that.”
 
Middleton said he wonders if the program is intended more to punish casinos than to benefit child welfare services.
 
“It just seems like a lot to ask from a casino,” he said. “I don't see how they keep up with it.”
“Is it beneficial for us? No,” said Wade Duty, executive director of the Louisiana Casino Association. “But it is beneficial for children who have parents who are not paying their child support.”
 
Duty said the law is just another requirement the casino industry has to comply with.
 
“I wouldn't say that it's too much,” he said. “Casinos are used to being a highly regulated industry, and if it's a requirement then that's what we're going to do.”
 
Duty said the program doesn't involve too much of a financial constraint on casinos because it's not necessarily their money that's being lost.
 
“These are winnings that would normally be paid to a player,” he said. “But because that player has an obligation that supersedes his interests, then it's going to be routed to DCFS for distribution to the dependent child.”
 
The only money coming out of the casinos' pockets, Duty said, is the labor costs and time it takes to make sure the money is remitted to the state.
 
“We are in the customer service business, and if you have to suspend everyone's jackpot while you hunt through a 120,000-name database then it gets very cumbersome,” he said. “But DCFS did a really good job about listening to our concerns, and they produced a product that is easily searchable.”
 
Casino interceptions is just one of many avenues the state can use to enforce these payments.
 
Failure to pay court-ordered child support can result in liens against a non-payer's property; seizure of assets; suspension of driver's, hunting or fishing licenses; interception of state and federal tax refunds; passport denial; and contempt of court charges, among other enforcement actions.
 
Any parent or person responsible for a child can receive services from the state's Child Support Enforcement program. For information or to apply for services, visit www.dcfs.la.gov/CSE.
You can also search the database for Louisiana delinquent child support payers at www.dcfs.la.gov/delinquent.
 
 

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Slap On The Wrist for Golden Nugget Owner

Interesting Forbes story that puts the fine in perspective --

The World's Richest Restaurateur Has A Secret: It's Not About The Food

 

Texas billionaire Atlantic City casino owner fined for gambling



The Texas billionaire who owns Golden Nugget Atlantic City casino has agreed to pay a $15,000 fine.
 
New Jersey regulators cited Tilman Fertitta for playing blackjack at two Atlantic City casinos last year. That violates a law that bars holders of a key casino employee license from gambling in Atlantic City.
 
 
 
Golden Nugget general manager Tom Pohlman tells the Press of Atlantic City Fertitta feels bad because he didn't know about the ban. Pohlman says Fertitta can gamble in Nevada except at his own casino.
 
 
 
Pohlman says the Golden Nugget notified regulators after Fertitta had said he had gambled.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/23/texas-billionaire-atlantic-city-casino-owner-fined-for-gambling/#ixzz2IoWIomgL

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Singapore: Protecting Its Citizens

Singapore has continued to treat Casino Operators as guests to protect their citizens and families, addressing problems, increasing fines as casinos fail to uphold the laws.
 
 
 

Singapore ups ante for casino firms with new rules, bigger fines

 
SINGAPORE (Reuters) - In any casino, the odds favor the house. Using its house edge, Singapore is seeking to maximize economic profits and minimize social costs with tighter rules and tougher fines for two casino operators, along with new steps to curb problem gambling.
The wealthy and regimented city-state has enjoyed a windfall of tourism, jobs and revenue since Las Vegas Sands Corp and Genting Singapore Plc opened casino complexes in 2010, in part by linking their licenses to how well they develop attractions that are not related to gambling.
Under that mandate, the two operators have added theme parks, museums, theatres and high-end hotels, boutiques and restaurants to Singapore's landscape as the Asian business hub recasts itself as a global city and oasis for the rich.
Amendments to the Casino Control Act cleared parliament late last year and now await formal passage into law, giving the operators of Marina Bay Sands and Resorts World Sentosa little choice but to adapt to the new rules - including fines of up to 10 percent of gaming revenue - and the costs of compliance.

"It is timely that the legislation be reviewed and further tweaks be made to ensure that the objectives of setting up the integrated resorts are achieved," said Yap Wai Ming, a partner at Stamford Law Corp who tracks casino regulation. "They have already invested billions of dollars and the casinos are still generating very healthy profits despite the enforcement actions."

Marina Bay Sands declined to comment on Singapore's new rules and a spokeswoman did not respond to another query about the prospects for its non-gaming business.

Lim Kok Thay, chairman of Genting Bhd, said last month he expects tourists to play a big part in Resorts World Sentosa's growth and its non-gambling business to continue to do better than the gaming side that brings in the bulk of revenues.

SOCIAL COST?

Although casino takings have dipped as some of the novelty wears off on a small island of 5.3 million people, earnings at both resorts likely topped $1 billion last year as visitors poured in from China, Indonesia, Malaysia and further afield.

But there are rumblings about social ills. Some lawmakers question whether Singapore really needs casinos and counselors say they see more people who cannot control their betting.

For Jimmy, the opening of the two all-hours casinos pulled him back into a gambling addiction he had managed to keep in check for 14 years, sending his world crashing down with losses of S$250,000 ($203,000) over 13 months at the Baccarat tables.

"Casinos did bring more jobs, more visibility for Singapore, more economic benefits," said the education professional, who is now free of debt and in counseling. "Yet it's also undeniably true that the undercurrents behind these benefits are there too - broken families and ruined lives and the increased social costs that come with it."



FINES AND BANS

Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore's founding leader and influential elder statesman, resisted casinos for decades. He finally relented, he told National Geographic magazine in 2009, when younger colleagues said "we must have a casino, otherwise we are out of the circuit of this fast set that goes around the world."

The government, which makes citizens and permanent residents pay a casino entry levy of S$100 a day or S$2,000 for an annual pass as part of efforts to deter problem gambling, shows no sign of abandoning its support for the two resorts.
But Las Vegas Sands and Genting Singapore could see fewer locals in their casinos under the new rules and risk much costlier punishments for breaking them.
The operators, which have been fined for admitting minors and failing to collect the levy for the government, will face a maximum penalty of 10 percent of annual gross gaming revenue. The current cap on fines is S$1 million but, if fully enforced, the new ceiling could be closer to S$200 million.

A panel will also be set up by the trade ministry to help the Casino Regulatory Authority determine how attractive the resorts are as tourist destinations - an assessment that will apply to the renewal of their casino licenses from January 2015.

"Protecting vulnerable groups and the society at large from the harm of casino gambling is another priority," S. Iswaran, Singapore's second minister for trade, said in October.
For those deemed to be at risk, the new rules include a monthly limit on casino visits to bolster existing safeguards.
Under a program now run by the National Council on Problem Gambling, more than 85,000 people have banned themselves from the casinos and nearly 1,300 more were excluded at the request of family members, the latest data shows. Another 43,000 people who are bankrupt or get state aid are automatically banned.




Singapore's "archaic and outdated" rules on Internet betting are a future target for changes, said Yap at Stamford Law. "Problem gambling and massive tax leakages and lack of visibility continue to pervade this sector," he said.
"This is a space to watch."

GLOBAL APPEAL

For Genting Singapore, gaming revenues at Resorts World Sentosa fell 15 percent in the first nine months of last year from the same period of 2011. Analysts have cut earnings estimates and downgraded the stock.
Third-quarter casino revenues at Marina Bay Sands fell nearly 30 percent, Las Vegas Sands said.

Still, the Singapore casino had a gross profit margin above 40 percent - higher than any of the company's U.S. and Macau properties.

Despite the tougher climate, the money rolls in.

"The domestic market is the one that gives you the adrenaline rush when it first opens, but it will be sustained by inflow from the foreign players," said Genting's Lim.

"As we open more facilities, that will give us an edge in marketing overseas and in telling the world we are not just a gaming resort, but we have other things for families to do. It does help us in our gaming revenue."

($1 = 1.2295 Singapore dollars)
(Additional reporting by Anshuman Daga and Charmian Kok; Editing by Ian Geoghegan)

http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/01/08/singapore-casinos-idINL1E8MR0HN20130108

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Sands Bethlehem




Massachusetts ‘Gaming’ Future

They can catch their employees who steal with their high-tech security cameras and staff but they can’t catch those who put themselves on the casino control commissions’ exclusion list.

The Morning Call - January 02, 2013 - Sands Casino R Sands roulette dealer charged with theft of $600

 A roulette dealer at the Sands Casino Resort in Bethlehem was arrested on theft charges after trying to pocket $600 from the table during his shift, according to state police.

David H. Greger, 46, of 157 E. Wyomissing Ave., Mohnton, allegedly rolled six, $100 bills into his fist by manipulating the paddle used to push money into the drop box at the table during his Dec. 30 shift, state police said. He then placed the money into a pants pocket and left the casino with the money, state police said.

Greger was taken into custody and charged with one count of theft by unlawful taking. He was released under $2,500 unsecured bail after being arraigned by District Judge Diane M. Marakovits.

http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20130102%2FNEWS90%2F130109969&cid=sitesearch
See More

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Rivers Casino fined for underage gambling

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette - November 21, 2012 - Rivers Casino fined for underage gambling

Rivers Casino has been fined $50,000 by the state gaming control board in connection with four incidents involving underage gambling and another in which a problem gambler gained access to slot machines.

The gambling board said the four incidents of underage gambling occurred between January and May and involved three 20-year-old individuals, two men and a woman, and a 19-year-old man. Each person gambled on slot machines before being discovered and banned from the casino, according to the gaming board. The casino was fined $45,000 for those breaches. In Pennsylvania, gamblers must be at least 21.

The casino was fined another $5,000 for a December 2011 incident in which a woman on the gaming board's self-exclusion list was able to obtain a players card and gamble on slot machines. The self-exclusion list allows people to ban themselves from gambling at state casinos. The casinos must refuse their wagers and deny them other privileges like players club membership.

http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/neighborhoods-city/rivers-casino-fined-for-underage-gambling-662996/#ixzz2CrNc18zwSee More
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette - November 21, 2012 - Rivers Casino fined for underage gambling

Rivers Casino has been fined $50,000 by the state gaming control board in connection with four incidents involving underage gambling and another in which a problem gambler gained access to slot machines.

The gambling board said the four incidents of underage gambling occurred between January and May and involved three 20-year-old individuals, two men and a woman, and a 19-year-old man. Each person gambled on slot machines before being discovered and banned from the casino, according to the gaming board. The casino was fined $45,000 for those breaches. In Pennsylvania, gamblers must be at least 21.

The casino was fined another $5,000 for a December 2011 incident in which a woman on the gaming board's self-exclusion list was able to obtain a players card and gamble on slot machines. The self-exclusion list allows people to ban themselves from gambling at state casinos. The casinos must refuse their wagers and deny them other privileges like players club membership.

http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/neighborhoods-city/rivers-casino-fined-for-underage-gambling-662996/#ixzz2CrNc18zw

Monday, July 2, 2012

Singapore: Protecting its citizens




Read the attached from The WSJ.... http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2012/07/02/singapore-casino-controls-may-fuel-other-bets-experts-say/

The most glaring fact:

"Authorities have responded to reports of problem gambling with more safeguards, including plans announced last month to ban 15,000 more people, mainly the poor and unemployed, from the two casinos— Genting Singapore PLC’s Resorts World Sentosa and Las Vegas Sands Corp.’s Marina Bay Sands. That ban adds to the 28,000 people already barred on government orders, including people who are bankrupt and people receiving long-term government financial aid."

That's 43,000 people are being kept out of the country's two casinos because of their predatory business practices, one of which is owned by Genting.

Best,


Les Bernal
Executive Director, Stop Predatory Gambling

100 Maryland Avenue NE, Room 310 | Washington, DC 20002
o: (202) 567-6996 | stoppredatorygambling.org




THE WALL STREET HOURNAL | SOUTHEAST ASIA

  • July 2, 2012, 7:27 PM

  • Singapore Casino Controls May Fuel Other Bets, Experts Say


    By Chun Han Wong

    SINGAPORE – Since betting big on casino gambling two years ago, Singapore has taken a tough line on locals seeking to make a quick buck at its gaming centers, including restricting access for some residents. But while its stringent methods have helped keep casino-related excesses under control, some observers fear the regulations might be fueling other gambling ills beyond the city-state’s glitzy integrated resorts.

    Singapore’s two casinos—intended to help draw tourists and create jobs in the local service sector—have certainly given a shot of adrenaline to the city-state’s increasingly vibrant social scene, lifting tourist arrivals to a record last year. But a number of psychiatrists and counselors fear that policymakers may be focusing too much on the casinos when it comes to tackling gambling addiction.

    “The casinos have taken more than the necessary attention from other gambling activities,” said Thomas Lee, a gambling counselor at The Resilienz Mind clinic. “We’ve hardly heard (from the government) about the lotteries or horse racing, for example.”

    After lifting a longstanding casino ban in 2005 against fervent public opposition, the Singapore government has introduced a raft of measures to tackle casino-gambling addiction, including voluntary and mandatory entry bans, entry levies for citizens and permanent residents, bans on casino advertising that targets locals, and social programs discouraging heavy gambling.

    But “what about other forms of gambling?” said Dr. Lee, who is also a former chief of the Addiction Medicine Department at Singapore’s Institute of Mental Health. “The government has been too focused on tackling casino gambling.”

    An official survey on gambling habits, published in February, found in 2011 that lotteries were the most popular games among Singapore citizens and permanent residents ages 18 and above. Some 38% of locals had played “4D”—a game that involves guessing the winning four-digit combinations in weekly draws—within 12 months of the survey. About 28% gamble on “TOTO,” a weekly game in which players pick six numbers from one to 45. In contrast, table games at Singapore’s two casinos draw just 4% of locals, while jackpot machines on those premises attract just 3%.

    The survey suggested that government social safeguards have had some effect in controlling gambling, albeit with mixed results. The overall gambling rate among locals eased to 47% in 2011 from 54% in 2008. But the data also pointed to more low-income players betting large sums and frequent gamblers playing more often.

    Efforts to obtain official comment on whether the government is dedicating enough energy to minimizing problem gambling in lotteries and other non-casino games were not immediately successful. All legal non-casino gambling activities in the city-state are managed by the Singapore Totalisator Board, a statutory body that is the only organization here with legal rights to run lotteries, sports betting and horse-racing operations. Proceeds are steered into community development projects; the board’s website says it works to ensure the betting operations it oversees “are conducted with honesty and integrity.”

    Authorities have responded to reports of problem gambling with more safeguards, including plans announced last month to ban 15,000 more people, mainly the poor and unemployed, from the two casinos— Genting Singapore PLC’s Resorts World Sentosa and Las Vegas Sands Corp.’s Marina Bay Sands. That ban adds to the 28,000 people already barred on government orders, including people who are bankrupt and people receiving long-term government financial aid.

    “The government’s intention was to protect vulnerable Singaporeans from the worst effects of the casinos, and to this end they have succeeded to a large extent,” said Munidasa Winslow, a psychiatrist and executive director at mental-health consultancy Promises. “We do have a gambling problem in many forms, but they are mainly looking at it at the casino leveI—I guess that’s because the casinos are the fastest way that someone can go from normality to being out of control.”

    Nonetheless, authorities should step up measures against other forms of gambling such as illegal sports betting and internet gambling, the psychiatrist said. “My own suspicions are that the vast majority of the people who are vulnerable—like the poor and the elderly—are spending more of their money on TOTO and 4D and other games.”

    One area of growing concern is internet gambling, which can throw up significant policy-making challenges given the difficulty of detecting and policing such activity, said Sally Gainsbury, a research fellow at Australia’s Southern Cross University. A recent report by U.K.-based Global Betting and Gaming Consultants showed that Singapore residents lost $357.2 million to online gambling websites in 2011, up from $312.5 million in 2010 and $271.5 million in 2009.

    Authorities have indicated recently that they are aware of at least some new gambling trends that could pose challenges for the city-state. In February, the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports flagged internet gambling as an “emerging concern,” but conceded that the problem was difficult to tackle given the private nature of the activity, and the high internet usage by the city-state’s technologically savvy population.


    http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2012/07/02/singapore-casino-controls-may-fuel-other-bets-experts-say/


    NOTE: GENTING is the financial backer of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe in Massachusetts.

    Singapore has been proactive in protecting its citizens because it doesn't want the CRIME and FAMILY DESTRUCTION caused by Predatory Gambling -- Dangerous Games