Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Joseph Fernandes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joseph Fernandes. Show all posts

Friday, June 21, 2013

Plainville's Failure to Post Public Meeting Limits Audience



Bruins win out over slots
Latest Plainridge forum takes second billing to playoffs
Posted: Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:18 am
BY JIM HAND SUN CHRONICLE STAFF
The Sun Chronicle

PLAINVILLE - Slot machines at Plainridge Racecourse is the hottest issue to hit Plainville in years, but not even it can compete with the Boston Bruins for attention.

The town's gambling consultant held its third public forum on the prospect of expanded gambling at the harness track Wednesday, and only 34 people showed up.

Most of those at the Wood School were town officials, Plainridge representatives and consultants.

Only a few private citizens attended.

Town Administrator Joseph Fernandes speculated the Bruins' Stanley Cup championship game against the Chicago Blackhawks might have been the reason for the low attendance.

Another reason might be residents have heard enough. The consultant has now held three forums, the track has held one and the state Gaming Commission held another. Previous forums attracted much larger crowds.

Although the audience was small, it was curious. Residents asked a number of questions of consultant Will Cummings and Town Counsel Jonathan Silverstein.

Selectmen are negotiating a "host community agreement" with Plainridge on how it might compensate the the town for allowing it to add 1,250 slot machines and a $125 million gaming facility to its track, and many of the questions and comments were concentrated on the agreement.

Resident Dan Campbell asked if fees paid by the track to Plainville would first go through the state.

Cummings said the agreement would call for Plainridge writing a check directly to the town.

Selectmen have not said how much compensation they are looking for, but Raynham Park has agreed to pay the Town of Raynham $1.1 million in fees if it gets the sole slot machine license available from the state.

Resident Ellen DeAngelis noted that Plainridge has said it would give preference to Plainville citizens for jobs. She asked if it could be required in the agreement that a percentage of all level of jobs go to town residents, and not just the low-level positions.

Cummings said it would be difficult to stipulate that in an agreement, but he anticipates slot machines would create more jobs than Plainville residents could fill.

The track anticipates 400 jobs.

Town Moderator Andrew Martin asked if the host agreement could stay in effect longer than the five-year license the state would issue. Martin said it would.

Another resident asked if the host agreement could be altered by townspeople before they vote on whether to ratify it.

Fernandes said the agreement would be a binding contract, and voters would only be allowed to approve it or reject it.

Selectman Rob Rose, Fernandes, Cummings and Silverstein are negotiating the agreement for the town.   

Amazing!

Fernandes said the negotiators would be seeking a certain amount of money to mitigate the expanded gambling, and town meeting would decide how that money is spent.

Cummings showed a number of graphs to explain where slot machine revenue would go.

From 85 to 92 percent would go back to slot machine players as winnings, he said.

Of the remainder, he said 40 percent goes to the state, another 9 percent goes toward increasing purses at racetracks, 29 percent would go toward operating expenses, 22 percent would go toward earnings, debt payments, income taxes and depreciation.

The amount going to the town must be negotiated.

Cummings said the anticipation is that negotiations would be concluded by June 30, and a referendum would be held about Sept. 10.

http://www.thesunchronicle.com/news/local_news/bruins-win-out-over-slots/article_c51754d5-ac6f-5f22-ba08-7df943244020.html


Follow-up - Forum was on the Town website:

I just sent this to the Sun Chronicle:

Apparently the Plainville Gambling Consultants forum was posted on the Plainville website in the "News and Announcements" section — not a place any of us thought to look for a posted meeting. Still, it was buried in the website, and so I stand corrected. You should disregard my previous letter to the editor.

Thanks.

Mary-Ann Greanier
 

Monday, June 3, 2013

Slot Barn: Plainville's boom?

When reports are hastily prepared, careful consideration is circumvented.

Since most of the low wage jobs provided will be part-time, the problem of sub-standard housing, called 'hot bedding,' appears ignored.

How much will water and sewer cost?
[In Palmer, the Citizens' Study Committee determined the annual cost to host Mohergan Sun would be $18 MILLION to $39 MILLION. It would seem that factoring the reduced traffic volume places the Plainville estimates rather low.]

It is known that the facility will EXPAND to include table games. It has been publicly discussed during the Gam[bl]ing Commission's meetings.

There are numerous other issues not included in the rush of Casino Cheerleaders that will short-change the future of Plainville.



Plainville's boom?

Report: Slots would generate $8.6M, but cost up to $5.6M
Aerial Photos 2012

Aerial Photos 2012


A consultant's report says that proposed slot machines at Plainridge Racecourse in Plainville, seen here last November, would generate $8.6 million over five years, but would cost the town up to $5.6 million in services and facilities.

Posted: Monday, June 3, 2013

BY JIM HAND SUN CHRONICLE STAFF
The Sun Chronicle

PLAINVILLE - Slot machines at Plainridge Racecourse would generate $8.6 million for Plainville over five years, but would cost the town up to $5.6 million in services and facilities, a consultant's report estimates.

The cost to the town would include $3.1 million for the fire department for additional personnel and a new fire station, according to Cummings Associates, a gaming consultant hired by selectmen.

The report said Fire Chief Ted Joubert believes the town needs either a satellite station to handle the northeastern end of Plainville, or a new, larger headquarters to service the entire town.

Joubert, however, told The Sun Chronicle he believes the station and additional fire personnel are needed regardless of whether the slot machine parlor gets built.

He said the response time from the downtown fire station to the northeastern end of town and other locations is more than the five-minute national standard.

A new housing complex off Taunton Street and a planned shopping center off Madison Street will result in more fire and ambulance runs to the northeastern sector, with or without the slot machines, he said.

A slot parlor at the Route 1 racetrack will make the needs all the greater, he said, because an expected 6,000 cars per day are expected to visit the site.

The gambling customers will have their share of medical emergencies and auto accidents, requiring service, he said.

The best place for a new station would be near the intersection of Routes 1 and 106, he said. Rushing to emergencies in that area puts a lot of strain on fire trucks because the drive is uphill.

The Cummings Associates report also found that the police department would need an additional $742,000 to $1.5 million for more personnel and the school department would require another $774,000.

The slot machines are unlikely to attract many new families to Plainville and send their children to public schools, the report said, but the Taunton Street housing complex and other factors could increase enrollment by 1.5 percent.

In total, it was estimated slot machines would cost the town $4.8 million to $5.6 million in additional services and facilities.

Cummings, with the help of EKayPlainridge on mitigating the impact of expanded gambling. Selectmen have entered negotiations to come up with a host-community agreement with Plainridge that is required of all applicants for state gambling licenses.

The state Gaming Commission will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. Tuesday at the Senior Center on School Street on its procedures for considering applications for slot machine and casino licenses.

In addition to estimating the cost to the town of additional services made necessary by slot machines, the consultant came up with figures for potential revenue to the town.

The report states that the $250 million expansion Plainridge anticipates if it gets a slot machine license from the state would produce $8.6 million in additional revenue for the town over five years.

The bulk of that figure comes from an estimated $7.2 million in property taxes on the gambling facility.

Another $391,000 would come meals taxes, $816,000 from building permits and $204,000 from additional taxes from horse racing.

The estimates do not include any payments selectmen might negotiate with the track, such as a percentage of the take from the slot machines.

Town Administrator Joseph Fernandes said no matter how you look at the numbers, they are a net gain for Plainville when it comes to revenue.

He said he believes the estimates by Cummings were made "with an abundance of caution."

Joubert's requests for more personnel and a new station have been made before, Fernandes said, and should not be attributed solely to the track expanding into slot machines.

"You can't say 'Plainridge is the straw that broke the camel's back.' The need is already there. Plainridge makes it more difficult," Fernandes said.

Planning board Chairman Stanley Widak has questioned the $816,000 estimate for building permits.

He said Thursday that permit payments are a one-time income, and he does not understand why the consultant spread them over five years. He said he also questions whether the total will actually reach $816,000.

Fernandes said he believes the estimates are fairly accurate.

Building permits are based on 1.4 percent of construction costs, he said. If the construction costs for the project come to about $60 million, the estimate should be on target, he said.

Fernandes said the track has already paid $154,000 for building permits on a parking garage and other work at the site.

http://www.thesunchronicle.com/news/local_news/plainville-s-boom/article_ce42fbb0-fa9f-59ec-bd53-594e01e2b166.html


Friday, May 10, 2013

Plainridge Myths: Repeating a Lie Makes It So




Those of us who attended the many meetings about the race track in the late 1990s were told — repeatedly — by Gary Piontkowski and others that slot machines were not in their plans.

So why, during recent discussions about allowing Plainville to become a racino town, have we been told that Plainridge "always planned to have slots?" Everyone from Joe Fernandes to Andrea Soucy (who voted against the track in 1997) to Gary Piontkowski has insisted that we are mistaken about what we heard. Their mantra that Plainridge "always intended to have slots" has been repeated and repeated in meeting after meeting of the selectmen and other boards in town. (That, of course, is how you get someone to believe a lie — say it enough times until it sounds like the truth.)

Well, here is a Sun Chronicle article from October 28th, 1997, that begins: "The owner of the company planning to build a Route 1 harness racing track to replace Foxboro Park says slot machines are not part of his plans."

At the very least, I hope the selectmen will stop perpetuating the lie.

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Joseph Fernandes


From: Mary-Ann Greanier
Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:06 AM
To: Joseph Fernandes
Subject: consultant
 
Alright, Joe. Sorry for the confusion.  


On 21 Feb 2013, at 08:18, Joseph Fernandes wrote:

 Mary-Ann, I have issued no RFP for review of a "slot barn" proposal.

 Joe




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary-Ann Greanier
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:52 AM
> To: Joseph Fernandes
> Subject: consultant
>
> Good morning, Joe,
>
> Has anyone responded to Plainville's RFP for a consultant to assist with the
> Plainridge slot barn proposal? If so, may I have a list of those who have
> responded? When may I come to the office to look at their proposals?
>
> Will the interviews be done in an open meeting?
>
> Will the townspeople have any role in making the decision about who will
> work for us as consultant?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Mary-Ann
>