Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Senator Stanley Rosenberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Senator Stanley Rosenberg. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

Beacon Hill Genuflects to More Drunks on the road


Beacon Hill Prostitution disregards PUBLIC SAFETY!

No debate, no fanfare, no discussion! Just slip it in?

What happened to  Senator Stanley Rosenberg opposition?

Review the costs of:  HAPPY HOUR

FROM MASSterlist:

Casinos’ last-call perk has its share of critics
Public safety officials and casino opponents are among those sounding warnings after the state budget process resulted in the state’s future casinos being able to request the right to serve alcohol until 4 a.m., then start serving again at 8 a.m. Local bars and restaurants say the carve-out puts them at a competitive disadvantage. Dan Atkinson and Jordan Graham of the Herald have more.  
Boston Herald

Interesting budget tidbits: 4 a.m. liquor hours for casinos and T pension transfer
Gov. Baker yesterday signed, amended or rejected a number of policy riders within the state budget, two of which caught our attention, via the Globe: “Baker approved language, sought by the casino industry, to extend alcohol service at the gambling palaces until 4 a.m., two hours past what is permitted at the latest-serving restaurants and bars. Baker’s budget message also includes authorization for the state to transfer control of the MBTA employees pension fund into the state’s general pension program, a measure lawmakers have rejected previously.”


MASSACHUSETTS DRUNKS ON THE ROAD? Conn. ended push for 24-hour bars at casinos after crash


EXPANDED FREE ALCOHOL IS NOT  ''another little change'! 
Massachusetts has only Plainridge Slot Barn open at this time and already CHANGES?



How many DRUNKS do you want on the road? 
Masachusetts is unable to reduce ALCOHOL RELATED fatalities now. 




Reported by MASSterlist 04/14/2017:


Rosenberg ‘not a fan’ of extending casino last calls to 4 a.m.
The House budget unveiled earlier this week has an outside section that would allow casinos to sell liquor to gamblers an extra two hours till 4 a.m. But Shira Schoenberg at MassLive reports that Senate President Stan Rosenberg is “not a fan of the idea,” in his words. "We said we're not going to chip away at the statute because this is how it happens in state after state,"Rosenberg said. "First there's one little change, then another little change and before you know it the commonwealth loses control of the industry."
MassLive



Conn. ended push for 24-hour bars at casinos after crash

State had hoped to collect more slot machine profits

DRIVER CHARGED A sailor, Daniel E. Musser, 24, is charged with manslaughter and driving under the influence and faces up to 19 years in prison.DRIVER CHARGED
A sailor, Daniel E. Musser, 24, is charged with manslaughter and driving under the influence and faces up to 19 years in prison.
By Gregory B. Hladky
Globe Correspondent / March 22, 2009

HARTFORD - Officials looking to help solve Connecticut's multibillion-dollar deficit thought they had found an easy way to raise another $5 million a year: allow casinos to serve alcohol 24 hours a day.

A sailor, Daniel E. Musser, 24, is charged with manslaughter and driving under the influence and faces up to 19 years in prison.
DRIVER CHARGED
More hours of bar service would mean more gambling, they figured, which would mean the state could collect more slot machine profits.
But the proposal by Governor M. Jodi Rell's administration came to a sudden end at about 3:30 a.m. on March 7, when a car leaving the Mohegan Sun casino turned the wrong way down Interstate 395, headlights off, and slammed into a van full of college students on their way to Logan International Airport. They were scheduled for a flight to Uganda, where they had plans to help out at an orphan age over spring break.
Elizabeth Durante, a 20-year-old pre-med student at Connecticut College in New London, was killed.
The car's driver, Daniel E. Musser, 24, a sailor from the Naval Submarine Base in Groton, was charged with manslaughter and driving under the influence and faces up to 19 years in prison.
The next day, Rell called Durante's death "an unconscionable tragedy" and pulled back her budget proposal to make alcohol available 24 hours at the casinos.
"Even though this accident occurred under the laws as they have been for many years, the governor said it does give one pause to question the wisdom of extending liquor service hours at the casinos," Christopher Cooper, Rell spokesman, said recently. "We don't believe the bill is going to move forward this session."
Chuck Bunnell, chief of staff for the Mohegan Tribal Council, agreed.
"The Tribal Council in general has taken the position that it's time to pause and mourn the loss of this very bright light of humanity," Bunnell said, "that it's not appropriate to have those discussions right now."
Bunnell said the tribe was originally "approached on a bipartisan basis" by lawmakers looking for ways to increase state revenue.
Lori A. Potter, a spokeswoman for the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, said analysts at the tribe's Foxwoods Resort Casino stand by their prediction that extending casino bar hours would result in an increase in state revenue.
"It is important to note that it would be impossible to find a more heavily regulated serving establishment in the state of Connecticut than the two casinos," Potter said.
Connecticut law requires the casinos' bars to stop serving by 1 a.m. Sunday through Thursday and by 2 a.m. Fridays and Saturdays. One of the arguments originally used in favor of allowing longer serving hours was that their competitors in Atlantic City serve alcohol 24 hours a day.
Legal hours for bars to serve alcohol vary greatly across the United States, according to Steven Schmidt, vice president for public policy at the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association.
In Massachusetts, for example, state law allows service until 11 p.m., but local governing bodies can extend the hours to 2 a.m. In states such as New Jersey and Nevada, Schmidt said, local authorities are allowed to set bar closing hours.
Charles H. Gartman, one of the students with Durante in the van that night, has difficulty understanding why anyone thought round-the-clock liquor at the casinos was a good idea.
"Twenty-four-hour bar service is a little bit ridiculous," Gartman said last week in a phone interview from his New York City home. "You can't trust everyone to drink and drive safely."
Gartman, 19 and a sophomore at Connecticut College, has not yet recovered from injuries he suffered in the crash.
The five other passengers also suffered injuries, some minor.
"Both my legs were pretty banged up, and at first I couldn't walk," he said. "I have pretty severe lacerations on my chin."
Nor has he recovered from the loss of Durante, of West Islip, N.Y. Gartman said it was Durante who got him interested in going to Uganda to aid orphaned children. "It was her enthusiasm for helping people," he recalled.
Stephanie Hinman, who was Durante's roommate and one of the students on the Uganda trip, finds it ironic that her friend would die at the hands of an accused drunk driver.
"Neither Liz nor I ever drank," Hinman said from her home in Norfolk, Conn.
"We lived together in the substance-free dorm."
In a 2007 interview with a college publication, Durante said she wanted to become a surgeon and work in Africa with Doctors Without Borders.
For Janice Heggie Margolis, executive director of the Connecticut chapter of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, Durante's death provided tragic evidence of why casino liquor hours should never be expanded.
She said the potential price to society of more fatal crashes is simply too high, no matter how much money might flow to the state. "This is exactly the reason why," Heggie Margolis said.
"You can never put on paper the cost of a life."


http://archive.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2009/03/22/conn_ended_push_for_24_hour_bars_at_casinos_after_crash/

Wednesday, May 3, 2017

MASSACHUSETTS DRUNKS ON THE ROAD? Conn. ended push for 24-hour bars at casinos after crash



EXPANDED FREE ALCOHOL IS NOT  ''another little change'! 
Massachusetts has only Plainridge Slot Barn open at this time and already CHANGES?



How many DRUNKS do you want on the road? 
Masachusetts is unable to reduce ALCOHOL RELATED fatalities now. 




Reported by MASSterlist 04/14/2017:


Rosenberg ‘not a fan’ of extending casino last calls to 4 a.m.
The House budget unveiled earlier this week has an outside section that would allow casinos to sell liquor to gamblers an extra two hours till 4 a.m. But Shira Schoenberg at MassLive reports that Senate President Stan Rosenberg is “not a fan of the idea,” in his words. "We said we're not going to chip away at the statute because this is how it happens in state after state," Rosenberg said. "First there's one little change, then another little change and before you know it the commonwealth loses control of the industry."
MassLive



Conn. ended push for 24-hour bars at casinos after crash

State had hoped to collect more slot machine profits

DRIVER CHARGED A sailor, Daniel E. Musser, 24, is charged with manslaughter and driving under the influence and faces up to 19 years in prison.DRIVER CHARGED
A sailor, Daniel E. Musser, 24, is charged with manslaughter and driving under the influence and faces up to 19 years in prison.
By Gregory B. Hladky
Globe Correspondent / March 22, 2009

HARTFORD - Officials looking to help solve Connecticut's multibillion-dollar deficit thought they had found an easy way to raise another $5 million a year: allow casinos to serve alcohol 24 hours a day.

A sailor, Daniel E. Musser, 24, is charged with manslaughter and driving under the influence and faces up to 19 years in prison.
DRIVER CHARGED
More hours of bar service would mean more gambling, they figured, which would mean the state could collect more slot machine profits.
But the proposal by Governor M. Jodi Rell's administration came to a sudden end at about 3:30 a.m. on March 7, when a car leaving the Mohegan Sun casino turned the wrong way down Interstate 395, headlights off, and slammed into a van full of college students on their way to Logan International Airport. They were scheduled for a flight to Uganda, where they had plans to help out at an orphan age over spring break.
Elizabeth Durante, a 20-year-old pre-med student at Connecticut College in New London, was killed.
The car's driver, Daniel E. Musser, 24, a sailor from the Naval Submarine Base in Groton, was charged with manslaughter and driving under the influence and faces up to 19 years in prison.
The next day, Rell called Durante's death "an unconscionable tragedy" and pulled back her budget proposal to make alcohol available 24 hours at the casinos.
"Even though this accident occurred under the laws as they have been for many years, the governor said it does give one pause to question the wisdom of extending liquor service hours at the casinos," Christopher Cooper, Rell spokesman, said recently. "We don't believe the bill is going to move forward this session."
Chuck Bunnell, chief of staff for the Mohegan Tribal Council, agreed.
"The Tribal Council in general has taken the position that it's time to pause and mourn the loss of this very bright light of humanity," Bunnell said, "that it's not appropriate to have those discussions right now."
Bunnell said the tribe was originally "approached on a bipartisan basis" by lawmakers looking for ways to increase state revenue.
Lori A. Potter, a spokeswoman for the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, said analysts at the tribe's Foxwoods Resort Casino stand by their prediction that extending casino bar hours would result in an increase in state revenue.
"It is important to note that it would be impossible to find a more heavily regulated serving establishment in the state of Connecticut than the two casinos," Potter said.
Connecticut law requires the casinos' bars to stop serving by 1 a.m. Sunday through Thursday and by 2 a.m. Fridays and Saturdays. One of the arguments originally used in favor of allowing longer serving hours was that their competitors in Atlantic City serve alcohol 24 hours a day.
Legal hours for bars to serve alcohol vary greatly across the United States, according to Steven Schmidt, vice president for public policy at the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association.
In Massachusetts, for example, state law allows service until 11 p.m., but local governing bodies can extend the hours to 2 a.m. In states such as New Jersey and Nevada, Schmidt said, local authorities are allowed to set bar closing hours.
Charles H. Gartman, one of the students with Durante in the van that night, has difficulty understanding why anyone thought round-the-clock liquor at the casinos was a good idea.
"Twenty-four-hour bar service is a little bit ridiculous," Gartman said last week in a phone interview from his New York City home. "You can't trust everyone to drink and drive safely."
Gartman, 19 and a sophomore at Connecticut College, has not yet recovered from injuries he suffered in the crash.
The five other passengers also suffered injuries, some minor.
"Both my legs were pretty banged up, and at first I couldn't walk," he said. "I have pretty severe lacerations on my chin."
Nor has he recovered from the loss of Durante, of West Islip, N.Y. Gartman said it was Durante who got him interested in going to Uganda to aid orphaned children. "It was her enthusiasm for helping people," he recalled.
Stephanie Hinman, who was Durante's roommate and one of the students on the Uganda trip, finds it ironic that her friend would die at the hands of an accused drunk driver.
"Neither Liz nor I ever drank," Hinman said from her home in Norfolk, Conn.
"We lived together in the substance-free dorm."
In a 2007 interview with a college publication, Durante said she wanted to become a surgeon and work in Africa with Doctors Without Borders.
For Janice Heggie Margolis, executive director of the Connecticut chapter of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, Durante's death provided tragic evidence of why casino liquor hours should never be expanded.
She said the potential price to society of more fatal crashes is simply too high, no matter how much money might flow to the state. "This is exactly the reason why," Heggie Margolis said.
"You can never put on paper the cost of a life."


http://archive.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2009/03/22/conn_ended_push_for_24_hour_bars_at_casinos_after_crash/

Friday, October 3, 2014

Question 3....No Debate? The Secrecy of Predatory Gambling?








Casino clash shaping up ahead of election




Gerry Tuoti
Wicked Local Newsbank Editor
Posted Oct. 2, 2014

While casino opponents may not have a chance to square off against casino CEOs and the lawmakers who crafted the state’s expanded gambling law, key players on both sides of the issue are scheduled to face off in a forum later this month.


The Ford Hall Forum at Suffolk University has announced an Oct. 23 panel discussion on Question 3, the ballot initiative seeking a repeal of the state’s 2011 casino gambling law. The event, according to the Ford Hall Forum, will feature Repeal the Casino Deal chairman John Ribeiro and former state Attorney General Scott Harshbarger on the anti-casino side; and Everett Mayor Carlo DiMaria and Coalition to Protect Mass. Jobs labor outreach director Charlie Stefanini.




Repeal the Casino Deal had previously launched an unsuccessful attempt to line up debates with several casino supporters, including Senate Majority Leader Stanley Rosenberg, House Speaker Robert DeLeo and the CEOs of MGM Resorts International, Penn National Gaming and Wynn Resorts.




The forum was announced after state Senate Majority Leader Stanley Rosenberg, D-Amherst, notified Repeal the Casino Deal that he was declining an invitation to a separate debate. Rosenberg played a major part in drafting the casino law that legislators passed in 2011. Repeal the Casino Deal said it had not received responses from the other parties.




“I have respectfully declined Yes on 3’s invitation,” Rosenberg said in a statement. “When legislators, and the governor, approved expanded gaming we did so only after painstaking research and extensive public debate. We’ve had our say on the issue. Voters, with Question 3, will now have the opportunity to have their say by either ratifying or repealing the law.” *****





Ribeiro criticized the response.




“If you’re not willing to stand before the people and promote your legislation, how strongly do you really feel about it?” Ribeiro said. “Our legislators have never held a public debate before the voters. Perhaps it’s difficult to defend this legislation when the decision was made without an independent cost-benefit analysis on casinos. I’m still willing to debate, if he has a change of heart.”


The state Gaming Commission has awarded resort casino licenses to Wynn Resorts, which plans to build in Everett, and MGM, which is proposing a Springfield casino. Penn National won the slots license and has begun construction in Plainville.


Massachusetts voters will decide Nov. 4 whether to repeal the law that authorizes up to three commercial casinos and one slots parlor statewide.


Casino opponents argue that expanded gambling has net negative impacts on the community, could lead to crime and harm small businesses.


Proponents of casino gambling say the industry will lead to economic development, increased state revenues and new jobs.


THIS IS ATLANTIC CITY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & HOMELESSNESS:











Penn National announced Wednesday that it is halfway through construction in Plainville.

“Eight months ago we started the development of this $225 million dollar facility, and in eight months we will open Plainridge Park Casino,” Penn National spokesman Jeff Morris said in a statement. “We are extremely proud of the work product to date, the jobs and revenue we have created for union construction workers and small businesses in Massachusetts, and the career opportunities for residents of the area that are coming in the very near future.”



http://www.tauntongazette.com/article/20141002/NEWS/141008524/11157/NEWS#NEWS/?Start=1&_suid=141238008467207226626106699296








****On a personal note, the PAINSTAKING RESEARCH Senator Rosenberg's seem to be referring to is his PERSONAL RESEARCH, discussed in PRIVATE, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS!

There was no PUBLIC DEBATE! Where is the RESEARCH? Who has it?

Senator Rosenberg repeatedly refused to discuss/address/present information publicly.

When has any other PUBLIC POLICY been so secret?









Why No Debate?





Casino Free Mass's photo.
 
 
 

Monday, September 29, 2014

Rosenberg: Political Coward




Fun Fact:  Before Senate President and casino-champion Therese Murray offered him her job, Stanley was anti-casino
Fun Fact: Before Senate President and casino-champion Therese Murray offered him her job, Stanley was anti-casino


 

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Mass. regulators explore potential impacts of online gambling


Gaming chief: ‘We can’t wait’ for online betting'

This is infuriating!

If the casinos are allowed to be built in Massachusetts, no one will live further than 50 miles from at least one, sometimes two, three, or four casinos; CT and RI casinos are already cannibalizing each other; NY casinos are proliferating; ME is looking to build more; and NH is poised to jump on the bandwagon. Now internet gambling? Internet Lottery? ...

Predatory gambling is failed public policy. It is the "solution" turned to by politicians and grifters in public office who will not do the work of creating and nurturing real revenue sources, who cave-in to corporate influence, who refuse to tax the rich in favor of picking the pockets of the poor, working poor, and middle class.

Repeal The Casino Deal
http:www.RepealTheCasinoDeal.org

http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2014/03/gaming_chief_we_can_t_wait_for_online_betting


Gaming chief: ‘We can’t wait’ for online betting | Boston Herald
bostonherald.com
Gaming chief: ‘We can’t wait’ for online betting031114gamingar04.jpgPhoto by: Angela RowlingsNEW GROUND FOR MASS.? ‘The time is now, it’s upon us,’ Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby, above,...
 
 
The state Gaming Commission is looking to hit the jackpot by pushing Internet gambling, which would make Massachusetts the fourth state in the nation to open the door to online betting. “The time is now, it’s upon us,” Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen...
 
The state Gaming Commission is looking to hit the jackpot by pushing Internet gambling, which would make Massachusetts the fourth state in the nation to open the door to online betting.

“The time is now, it’s upon us,” Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby said yesterday. “We can’t wait any longer, even though we’re still in the middle of (casino) licensing.”

State Sen. Stanley C. Rosenberg, the architect of the state’s casino law, said he would take his cues from the commission on how best to legislate online gaming. “It’s a new frontier,” Rosenberg said. “I personally don’t see how you avoid it.

“You can’t control the Internet. When people turn on their computer they go where they want to go,” Rosenberg added. “We’re just at the early stages of trying to understand how this actually works, and given that you can organize businesses inside the commonwealth, within the country, and internationally and set them up online, so we need to figure out how that all works.”

Treasurer and gubernatorial candidate Steven Grossman is still in favor of exploring online gaming, his campaign said last night. In a 2012 report, a task force Grossman convened concluded, “If the Lottery does not enter this online market, other entrants — including commercial casinos, tribal casinos, commercial gaming companies and other states — will.”

The report added keeping Lottery sales agents working and helping problem gamblers would also need to be addressed.

It was all part of yesterday’s forum at the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center, where online betting dominated a day-long fact-finding forum.

So far, several models exist, including restricting online gambling to inside casinos, as in Nevada; only allowing licensed casinos to set up gambling sites, as in Nevada and New Jersey; and having the state Lottery run the sites and collect the revenue, as in Delaware.

Under federal law, all betting must take place within the Bay State’s borders — and sports betting is forbidden.

Crosby added awarding three casino licenses in the state — two by this summer and possibly a third later on — must come first before online gaming is tackled. The lone state slots license has just been awarded to Penn National Gaming at the Plainridge harness race track in Plainville.

Yesterday’s forum included representatives from the states that have legalized online gambling, as well as reps from companies that provide equipment and guidance.

But not everybody is a fan.

John Ribeiro, chairman of the campaign to repeal the state’s casino law on the November ballot, called online gambling a scourge.

“There’s no shovel in the ground yet to build the casinos or slots parlors, but already we’re talking about expansions of casino gambling,” Ribeiro said. “This is what happens everywhere in the country, (casinos) get a foothold and expand at all costs.

“Instead of having honest debate about tax revenue and economic development,” he added, “we’re just going to allow these charlatans to open up casinos not just in our communities, but in every living room, every office, every door room in the state. We need to stop the bleeding.”
 

 
 

Mass. regulators explore potential impacts of online gambling



BOSTON — The head of the state's gambling commission suggested on Tuesday that lawmakers hold off on key decisions about Internet gambling until after the panel completes the process of awarding casino licenses in Massachusetts.

The commission convened an all-day hearing to examine the potential impact of online gambling should it be legalized in the state. Lawmakers and gambling regulators worry that it could take a bite out of revenues currently produced by the state lottery and that are expected to be generated by taxes on casinos in the future.

Commissioners awarded the state's first expanded gambling license last month to Penn National Gaming, which plans to build a slots parlor at the Plainridge racetrack in Plainville. Licensees for resort casinos in greater Boston and western Massachusetts are expected to be named later this year.

Stephen Crosby, chairman of the five-member commission, said lawmakers have been urged not to do "anything serious" about online gambling until after the licenses are awarded, noting casino companies will be investing hundreds of millions of dollars in Massachusetts, "and it's only appropriate that they be at the table when we figure out what do with Internet gaming."

Three states, New Jersey, Nevada and Delaware, currently allow some form of online gambling, with at least 10 other states considering bills, according to a recent survey by Gambling Compliance, a group that tracks gambling-related legislation worldwide.

State Senate Majority Leader Stanley Rosenberg, D-Amherst, told the commission that while Internet gambling seems likely to become a reality in the future, lawmakers are wary of potential effects on revenue to the state from lottery sales and future casinos.

"We don't want to kill the goose that laid the golden egg on the state lottery and the new goose that is hopefully going to lay some golden eggs in the coming years, the slots parlor and casinos," said Rosenberg, one of the principal architects of the 2011 expanded gambling law.

Crosby said any venture into online gambling should take place "hand in glove" with efforts to address gambling addiction.

Executives of virtual casino providers International Game Technology and Bally Technology were among those who appeared at Tuesday's forum, along with representatives from New Jersey, Nevada and Delaware.


http://www.therepublic.com/w/MA--Internet-Gambling-Massachusetts

Sunday, December 15, 2013

Regressive Tax Policies Defended By Beacon Hill

The more voters learn about Predatory Gambling, the more they oppose it.
In Massachusetts, communities are educating themselves and opposing the destruction of their neighborhoods.

Beacon Hill refused to consider the evidence around the nation and around the globe of increased crime, increased personal bankruptcies, increased domestic violence caused by Gambling Addiction.

The COSTS exceed the BENEFITS!

It's time to REPEAL THE CASINO DEAL!




Published on Dec 23, 2012
Politicians say that casinos create economic development. Here is the Revel Casino in Atlantic City, NJ. (Most media photos are from the interior of the casino looking out onto the beach and ocean.)




Published on Aug 9, 2012
Please click LIKE/SHARE. Venerable news anchorman Walter Cronkite hosts this in-depth look at the pervasiveness and effects of government's policy of promoting gambling on American culture. Broadcast in 1994 just as government began a massive expansion of gambling across the U.S, Cronkite explores questions like, is the lure of "easy money" replacing a strong work ethic in the attitudes of American youth, and is the funding of state and federal government through the proceeds of legal gambling a proper way of conducting government? Cronkite details the history of legalized gambling in America in an attempt to draw some conclusions about the impact gambling has had on the economic, moral, and social fabric of American society. The program features interviews with people from the average man on the street, to members of congress, to noted religious leaders.
****************************************­***************************************

Massachusetts faces $400 million fiscal hit if voters repeal casinos, automatic gas tax hikes


gas3.jpg
Outside the Statehouse in Boston in early October, Republican Rep. Geoffrey Diehl stood in the foreground, while Holly Robichaud, a Republican consultant, left, and Justin Thompson, a legislative aide, right, held a sign for repealing a law that automatically increases the gas tax to match inflation. A key lawmaker said that if voters approve the repeal, it would strip about $12 million a year that would be used on transportation improvements. (Dan Ring/The Republican)
 
Dan Ring, The Republican By Dan Ring, The Republicanmasslive.com
Follow on Twitter
on December 15, 2013


BOSTON -- State government will have less money for local aid, transportation and other services if voters approve planned ballot questions next year to kill casinos and annual increases in the gas tax, legislators said.

Organizers have each submitted more than enough certified voter signatures to place seven statewide questions on the ballot in November of next year including measures to repeal laws that legalize casinos and that automatically hike the gas tax to account for inflation.

Sen. Stanley C. Rosenberg, an Amherst Democrat, estimated that state government would face budget cuts if voters repeal the 2011 law that allows up to three casino resorts and a single slots facility.

stan.JPGStanley Rosenberg
 
Rosenberg said transportation funding would be hurt if voters revoke the law to increase the gas tax in accord with inflation starting in 2015.

The casinos and slots facility together could eventually generate $2 billion in gross gaming revenues each year. With a 25 percent tax rate on two commercial casino resorts, a 17 percent tax on a proposed Mashpee Wampanoag casino in Taunton, and 40 percent tax on the slots parlor, the state might eventually raise $300 million to $500 million a year, according to Rosenberg.

"If that money disappears, then there will be cuts," said Rosenberg, a key author of the casino law.
Rosenberg, the Senate majority leader, said about half the new casino revenues would be local aid for cities and towns and a sizable portion of the rest would go to transportation.

Rosenberg said he would personally vote against the ballot questions but he never tells people how to vote on ballot questions.

norbut.JPGKathleen Norbut

Kathleen Norbut of Monson, an original signer of the petition to revoke the casino law, said the state coffers will never see $400 million a year from casinos. She said casinos will be hurt by expansion of online gambling and declining interest from the public.

She also said legislators are failing to account for the social and other costs of casinos. Mitigation money does not cover the damage caused by casinos, she said.

"Let's get an independent cost-benefit analysis," she said. "You talk about the revenues. What about the costs?"

Norbut is a leading member of Repeal the Casino Deal, a coalition that collected about 73,000 certified voter signatures to make the ballot.

In order to make the ballot, the group may also need to persuade the state Supreme Judicial Court to overturn the attorney general's decision to ban the casino repeal question.

Beacon Hill is also worried about losing expected transportation dollars if voters approve a Republican-backed question to rescind the automatic increases in the state's 26.5 cent-a-gallon gas tax. The annual increases would begin in January of 2015.

Democratic Gov. Deval L. Patrick told reporters that the proposed ballot question is a mistake.

"Everywhere around the commonwealth people understand that we have got to invest in our transportation system in order to sustain and indeed accelerate growth," Patrick said. "While it was not my first choice, the Legislature ... selected the gas tax and a way not to have to come back to it every 15 minutes. And it hasn't been updated in many, many years. So I think the indexing is wise. I think it is fair and I think it was done in the right way ..."

Steven Aylward of Watertown, chairman of the Committee to Tank the Automatic Gas Tax Hikes, said history shows that legislators often divert tax dollars that are intended for a program such as transportation.

Aylward, a member of the Republican State Committee, said repeal of the law would put money where it belongs -- in the pockets of consumers.

Aylward said the "real issue" is that legislators should vote each year if they need revenues and want to raise the gas tax.

The provision for automatic increases is in a transportation financing law that raised the gas tax by three cents, starting July 31. The repeal effort received about 77,000 certified signatures.

Sen. Stephen M. Brewer, a Barre Democrat and chairman of the Senate Ways and Means Committee, said the provision would raise about $10 to $12 million a year.

Brewer said legislators should support the wishes of voters if they vote to repeal the law to index the gas tax to inflation.

Another ballot question with fiscal implications for state government is a proposed expansion of the state's 5 cent bottle deposit law to include additional containers such as water, flavored water, coffee-based drinks, juices and sports drinks.

The governor proposed a similar expansion, partly because he said it would generate about $25 million a year for the state including $5 million for recycling initiatives. The state receives money from unclaimed bottle and can deposits.

Christopher P. Flynn, president of the Massachusetts Food Association, which includes supermarkets and grocery stores, said the state already raises about $35 million a year from distributors who pay the nickel for each unredeemed container. There's something wrong when the state financially benefits from a law that fails because people don't return containers, he said.

"This is nothing more than a money grab," he said.

Janet Domenitz, executive director of the Massachusetts Public Interest Group, said advocates turned in about 106,000 certified signatures for the ballot question to expand the bottle deposit law.

If the law is approved, it would save about $6 million statewide for cities and towns, she said. The law would save on costs for litter and trash pickup, because it would increase redemptions, and therefore recycling, she said.

She said she is not using the argument that state government would get a boost from money from unclaimed deposits.

"I'm for this if 100 percent of nickels are redeemed," she said. "That's our goal."

Flynn said cities and towns would lose $15 million in annual payments for aluminum if the ballot question was approved. He said communities or their contractors are paid for the value of aluminum that is recycled.

Flynn said approval of the ballot question would require Massachusetts’ consumers and businesses to spend $58 million annually to operate an expanded redemption program.

Flynn said an expansion of the deposit law would be "counter productive." He said it costs three times as much to recycle bottles and cans by redemption than it does to recycle them by dropping them at municipal stations or by leaving them at the curbside for pickup.

"Folks are going to see through this," Flynn said of the proposed expansion of the bottle deposit law.

The secretary of state's office said backers of four other proposed statewide questions also collected more than the required 68,911 certified signatures to qualify for the 2014 ballot.

Two of those questions, if approved, would raise the minimum wage from $8 an hour to $10.50 an hour and would require that every worker in the state could earn up to 40 hours of sick time.

The Massachusetts Nurses Association also gathered more than enough voter signatures to put before voters two separate questions that would limit the number of patients who can be assigned to a nurse at one time and that would restrict CEO salaries and regulate the annual operating margins of hospitals.

Unless state lawmakers approve the proposed ballot questions by early May, supporters would need to gather an additional 11,485 signatures by early July to secure a spot on the ballot.



http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/12/massachusetts_faces_400_millio.html#incart_river_default

 

Sunday, March 10, 2013

REPEAL THE CASINO DEAL!




Mass. gambling foes aim for a referendum


By Liz Kowalczyk

Jon Chase for the Boston Globe
A group of casino opponents met at Wesley United Methodist Church in Framingham to plan for a statewide ballot question to repeal the state’s casino law.
 
 
FRAMINGHAM — Gambling opponents from across Massachusetts mapped out plans in a church basement Saturday to repeal the 2011 state law allowing resort casinos.
 
The first significant step for the group is to gather more than 70,000 signatures from registered voters by late November of this year. If the signature drive is successful, they probably will ask voters to repeal the casino law in a statewide ballot question in November 2014.
 
The anticasino group, called Repeal the Casino Deal, includes activists who are fighting specific casinos in their own communities; a national antigovernment-sponsored gambling organization called Stop Predatory Gambling; a former state senator; and a Hampshire College architecture professor who wrote a book on gambling in the United States.
 
“This was rammed through without a democratic process,’’ Robert Goodman, author of “The Luck Business: The Devastating Consequences and Broken Promises of American’s Gambling Explosion,” said of the state law during Saturday’s strategy session. “Whether you are for it or against it, let’s get it on the ballot.’’
 
 
 

 
 
Getting the question before voters — and persuading them to back a repeal — will be a steep climb that requires considerable work and money.
 
The 2011 casino law authorized up to three resort casinos in Massachusetts — no more than one in each of three regions of the state — and one slots parlor that can be built in any region. Opponents argued passionately that casinos promote addiction and prey on the poor.
 
 
 
But in the end, the Legislature and Governor Deval Patrick decided casinos would create thousands of jobs and bring tens of millions of dollars in new tax revenue to the state. [Any reasonable person can determine that the revenue projections are grossly overstated and the low wage job creation is wildly exaggerated. Any reasonable person can determine that the COSTS exceed the wild promises. That's why Beacon Hill refused to conduct an INDEPENDENT COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS.]
 
 
Eleven developers, including three in Greater Boston, have applied to the state gambling commission for the casino and the slots parlor licenses. The bulk of the $4.4 million in applications fees collected by the state pays for the commission to investigate each developer, to weed out any company with shaky finances, or with people of questionable character in key positions.
 
Developers must win approval from their host communities in a voter referendum to complete their applications for a casino license. The state gambling commission will award licenses through a competitive process.
 
The statewide ballot initiative would give opponents a second shot at keeping out casinos.
 
Opponents may have several factors working in their favor: The economy has improved since the
Legislature debated the 2011 casino law, and a number of casinos nationwide are struggling financially. They include Revel AC Inc., in Atlantic City, N.J., which received significant government support in the form of tax rebates that helped it raise construction funds.
 
John Ribeiro, who lives in Winthrop and is leading the ballot initiative, said the group has until September to have the repeal language approved by the attorney general’s office. Then, activists will have 8 to 10 weeks to collect signatures. About 70,000 names are required, but the group plans to collect 100,000 to ensure they have the necessary number of registered voters.
 
“There are 70,000 signatures out there easily,’’ said Charlotte Burns, who heads Quaboag Valley Against Casinos in Western Massachusetts. “A lot of people are disgusted with the whole thing and disappointed with [Governor] Patrick. I am hoping this is going to be the beginning of a movement.’’
 
Former state Senator Susan Tucker, who represented Andover and neighboring communities, said she opposes casinos because the industry “makes its profits off of addiction.’’ But she warned that developers and their supporters will work hard to thwart the ballot drive.
 
State Senator Stan Rosenberg, a Northampton Democrat who favors the gambling law, agreed that “a lot of money will be spent’’ to defeat the repeal effort and that most polls show the public supports giving people the option of gambling.
 

Senator Rosenberg profits from CASINO STOCKS and readily acknowledges that Gambing Lobbyists buy access. Check his history!

 
 
Rosenberg said he could not predict the outcome of a referendum, but it is possible that some developers will have already begun construction in November 2014. If the repeal measure passes, he said, “that would be quite an interesting mess.’’
 
 
 








 

Monday, June 4, 2012

Mashpee Wampanoag Threats



When the TRUTH and the LAW are not on your side, Mr. Cromwell always threatens!





Mashpee Wampanoags threaten to ‘destroy’ casino competition

By Thomas Grillo
Monday, June 21, 2010

The chairman of the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe is fuming over a state Senate bill that does not reserve a casino license for an Indian tribe.

 "If the state gives a commercial license to another casino operator, we won't pay the state a cent when we build a casino in Southeastern Massachusetts once expanded gaming is approved," said Cedric Cromwell. "We will destroy the competition, because we won't pay licensing fees or taxes and we will provide a great player experience with more wins." 
This is Taunton's partner?
The original Senate bill called for three casino licenses with one reserved for a "qualified" Indian tribe. But the revised measure, released Friday, removed the preference for a tribal casino.
 
Sen. Stanley Rosenberg (D-Amherst) said the preference was eliminated after hearing testimony that called for a level playing field on license distribution.
 
The tribe wants to build a $500 million complex in Fall River featuring a casino and conference center, three hotels and a massive mall with an indoor water park.
 
Cromwell has an agreement to purchase a 300-acre wooded site off Route 24 to construct First Light, a resort gambling complex including 2,500 slot machines, 150 table games, 24 poker tables and more than 5 million square feet of retail space. The tribe's partner is Arkana Ltd., an affiliate of Malaysian-based Kien Huat Realty, the initial investors of Foxwoods Resort Casino.
 
Cromwell said the tribe has not decided whether it will seek a commercial license. But the tribe faces considerable obstacles to building in Massachusetts, if and when the state approves expanded gambling.
 
If the state legalizes casinos, federal law would allow the tribe to build a casino on land taken into trust, Cromwell said. The tribe had previously applied to place land into trust in Middleboro and have notified the Interior Department that it intends to change the application to the Fall River site.
 
But last year, the Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Interior Department secretary could not take land into trust for tribes that were recognized after 1934. The Wampananogs were recognized in 2007.