Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Paul Burns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Burns. Show all posts

Friday, June 20, 2014

Palmer Voters Have Sense!


Early in the process, Palmer appointed a Citizens Task Force to consider the costs of hosting Mohegan Sun's Mega-Monster. 

When the Citizens determined conservatively that the ANNUAL cost would be $16 MILLION to $19 MILLION, not including the estimated $50 MILLION to bring water from the Quabbin, Paul Burns refused to make that information publicly available. 



Supporting a project that had the potential of bankrupting a small community is one thing, but to deny reality is yet another. 

Paul Burns, in his blind support failed to insist upon answers, such as access. 

Sadly, blind support isn't leadership. 

Paul Burns reflects on Palmer Town Council defeat


By Lori Stabile | Special to The Republican
on June 18, 2014
Paul Burns.JPG

Paul Burns campaigns for Town Council in Palmer in this 2007 file photo.

PALMER - Paul E. Burns is taking his Town Council loss in stride, saying he is not "terribly disappointed" that he was ousted from the council last week.

"I served for seven years and was somewhat on the fence about running. Certainly you want to leave on your own terms, but this is a democracy and voters chose not to send me back and that's fine," Burns said recently.

"I thought I'd be a lot more upset if I lost, but now it's like the weight of the world is off my shoulders," he added. "It can be someone else's turn."

Burns lost his at-large position to newcomer Robert B. Lavoie, who received 715 votes to Burns' 431 in the June 10 election. Lavoie beat Burns in all four precincts for the three-year position.

"Voters certainly deserve to have people in place that represent their views. I wish Mr. Lavoie the best of luck the next three years and I'm going to enjoy having the summer off. I haven't seen my kids the way I should for seven years, but I certainly wanted my kids to understand the value of public service," Burns said.

Burns, 53, said he has no plans to run again. He said he enjoyed his time on the council, calling it "an honor and a privilege to serve the people of Palmer."

Burns thinks the same anti-casino sentiment that sank Mohegan Sun's plan for a resort casino off Route 32 last year contributed to his loss - that along with voters wanting a change. While Burns was at times critical of Mohegan Sun, he was an outspoken proponent of a casino coming to Palmer.

"I put the bull's-eye on my back . . . It certainly may have been an anti-casino campaign, but I'm not sure I blame it on any one of those things. Ultimately l did what I thought was right . . . I don't ever want to be one of those politicians who goes with the breeze," Burns said.

"I'm not blaming anybody for anything here, except for me. I was vocal and I did what I thought was right and if I lose based upon my stands on issues then so be it," Burns said.

When he first ran for council, he said there were concerns about the form of government. Burns said one of the things he is most proud of is being able to solidify this form of government, and praised Town Manager Charles T. Blanchard's leadership.

"It took a few years to work the kinks out," Burns said.

Town Council President Philip J. Hebert said that one has to respect that Burns gave seven years of his time to serve on the council.

Hebert said he could not begin to speculate if Burns' casino stance contributed to his loss. The casino vote was close, and Burns was defeated by a large margin, Hebert said.

Lavoie officially replaces Burns on July 1. Burns said he will miss being on the council.

"I think I made a difference . . . When I first got on who thought we'd have a casino debate, a new police station. We got school roofs. We accomplished a lot in seven years," Burns said.

Burns said he has no regrets, but he said he did spend a lot of money to lose in the end - $2,500 for signs and mailings to 1,100 homes.



http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2014/06/paul_burns_reflects_on_palmer.html


Saturday, June 7, 2014

Mohegan Sun demands signs removed in Palmer




CLICK ON LINK FOR VIDEO


Mohegan Sun demands signs removed in Palmer



Mohegan Sun wants sign removed.

By Ryan Walsh, Investigative Reporter
Published: June 6, 2014

PALMER, Mass. (WWLP) – The 22News I-Team obtained a letter sent from Mohegan Sun to the Palmer land owners (Northeast Realty) it leases land from.

The letter sent from Mohegan Sun President Mitchell Etess has demanded that all signs on its land be removed in 30 days.



The letter states that if the signs aren’t removed Mohegan Sun says they would be able to default on their lease.

The letter also states specifically that political signs in support of Paul Burns must be removed.

Mohegan Sun has a 99 year lease on the land directly in front of Massachusetts Turnpike Exit 8 in Palmer. It had hoped to build a casino there, but Palmer voters rejected their plan in November.

Mohegan Sun has since partnered with Suffolk Downs in Revere and is attempting to win the Eastern Massachusetts casino license.

Paul Burns is a town councilor who supported the casino, but has also held Mohegan Sun accountable for saying that they would use that land in some other way instead of allowing it to remain undeveloped.




The read the redacted letter you can click here.



http://wwlp.com/2014/06/06/mohegan-sun-demands-signs-removed-in-palmer/



Saturday, February 22, 2014

Like the jilted bride: Palmer Landowner Sues Mohegan Sun







Palmer Landowner Sues Mohegan Sun

The owner of land in western Massachusetts where Mohegan Sun once planned a $1 billion casino is suing the Connecticut- based gaming company.
An artist's rendering of Mohegan Sun's proposed Palmer, MA casino. Voters rejected the project on Nov. 5, 2013.
Credit Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority


Northeast Realty Associates claims Mohegan Sun broke an exclusivity agreement for a casino project on a 152 acre site in Palmer. The suit accuses Mohegan Sun of abandoning that project for a more lucrative venture in the greater Boston area, before the November 5th referendum where Palmer voters rejected Mohegan Sun’s project by just 93 votes. It is an accusation that was raised previously by Palmer Town Councilor Paul Burns.

"It certainly seems like there was something going on behind the scenes. Whether there was or not you may never be able to prove it."

Mohegan Sun denies it began talks about another Massachusetts casino project prior to the Palmer referendum. Mohegan Sun is now trying to build a casino on property in Revere that is part of the Suffolk Downs race track.


http://wamc.org/post/palmer-landowner-sues-mohegan-sun



Feb 20, 2014, 9:59pm EST Updated: Feb 20, 2014, 11:24pm EST

Mohegan's Palmer landlord pursues breach- of-contract suit against casino operator


Managing Editor, Print- Boston Business Journal
Email | Twitter | Google+
 
As if the executives at the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority didn’t have enough to worry about.

With days to go before a make-or-break vote in Revere on Mohegan Sun’s casino plan for Suffolk Downs, Mohegan's landlord in Palmer is pursuing a breach-of-contract suit against the casino operator in Hampden Superior Court. The landlord, Northeast Realty Associates LLC, claims that Mohegan Sun violated the terms of its lease by pursuing this plan in Revere after voters in Palmer narrowly rejected a Mohegan Sun casino there.

To make things even more awkward, Mohegan Sun remains the tenant for the 152-acre site by the Mass. Pike in Palmer, under the terms of a 50-year ground lease signed in 2008. And Mohegan Sun just announced that it will hire CBRE/Grossman Retail Advisors LLC to recommend the best way to develop the property.

The timing of the lawsuit isn’t good for Mohegan. I received a copy of it tonight from representatives for Northeast, who said it would be filed on Friday, four days before the casino vote in Revere.

At the same time, this isn’t coming as a surprise. Northeast and its manager Leon Dragone have made it clear they’re not happy with Mohegan’s quick leap to Revere, and that their law firm was weighing a suit.

Northeast's lawsuit focuses on two claims. The first is that Mohegan officials began talks for a Suffolk Downs casino in October — violating an exclusivity agreement in the lease — after it became clear that Caesars Entertainment would be exiting the Suffolk project. The second claim is that in the final weeks leading up to the Nov. 5 vote in Palmer, Mohegan officials didn’t make the full-court press that needed to be done to win the vote: Mohegan, Northeast claims, ignored pleas to spend more money on advertising or put together a comprehensive traffic study to allay voters’ fears of congestion.

Mohegan officials have heard most of this before, and have denied these claims. They issued another brief statement tonight reiterating those denials. They say the Connecticut-based casino operator devoted more than five years and more than $25 million to a casino proposal in Palmer, and that it has been well established that there were no discussions between Mohegan and Revere officials or with Suffolk Downs about a Mohegan-Suffolk venture prior to the Nov. 5 defeat in Palmer.

Aside from Suffolk Downs, Mohegan and Northeast had been working toward a resort casino in Massachusetts longer than any other company. There was a time when this Palmer partnership seemed like the best of bets for a casino. No, there won’t be any such marriage ceremony anymore.

But there still could be an expensive divorce.

Further reading:
With Revere vote looming, bad blood remains between Mohegan Sun and its Palmer landlord


http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/blog/mass_roundup/2014/02/mohegan-suns-suit-from-palmer-landlord.html

 

Friday, February 14, 2014

Paul Burns' Vengeance?

Paul Burns' intent is unclear. Are his feelings hurt simply because he couldn't profit from the Casino Vultures?

 


The Town of Palmer appointed a Citizens' Casino Study Committee that determined the ANNUAL cost to host Mohegan Sun would be:

$18 MILLION to $39 MILLION

not including the estimated $50 MILLION to bring water from the Quabbin.


Paul Burns prevented that report from becoming public and refused to protect his community. Voters made that clear!

Let's not pretend!

The entire Casino Industry employs whatever tactics to recover their 'FREE LOANS.'

The Business Model of the Casino Industry depends on created NEW Gamblers and creating NEW Gambling Addicts.
Local LOW ROLLERS will support Suffolk Downs/Mohegan Sun's Folly. No 'high rollers' will venture forth. The Surrounding Communities will bear the burden as discretionary income is sucked from families.

http://middlebororemembers.blogspot.com/search?q=watanabe

It's time to REPEAL THE CASINO DEAL!



....given Mohegan's history with making questionable loans to vulnerable seniors and then trying to seize their property ( and unusual practice in the industry) should anyone vote in favor or Mohegan for any license anywhere in Mass?

Press Release: Mohegan Sun predatory practices

Contact: Paul Burns Palmer Town Councilor ...

Date: 2-12-2014

For Immediate Release

Recent media reports that Mohegan Sun loaned more than $36,000.00 to an 80 year old retiree with income of only $640.00 a month are mind boggling. Worse still are reports that Mohegan Sun then had a lien placed on his property including interest and fees of more than $5,100.00, an amount equal to two thirds of this gentlemen’s annual income. 

 Had this information been available to me during the time they were in Palmer I would not have supported their application in any way. Loaning $36,000.00 to someone who’s income was far below the poverty level guarantees that Mohegan Sun knew there was no way to collect on that debt short of taking his property.

 

THE INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE TO ANYONE WHO CONDUCTED THEIR DUE DILIGENCE!

 I strongly support Attorney General Coakley’s proposal to make this practice illegal. While this is clearly not the practice for most casino operators Mohegan Sun has demonstrated beyond a doubt that they can and will use tactics that amount to bullying to pad their bottom line. I urge the House and Senate to act quickly to ensure that such legislation is passed to prevent companies like Mohegan Sun from employing such underhanded practices here in Massachusetts.

 Until such legislation is passed, I urge the Gaming Commission to require all applicants to commit to ensuring that they will lend only to credit worthy applicants and will never place liens on a person’s primary residence. While it is clear that few in the gaming industry use such aggressive tactics that fact that any do begs the question as to their suitability for a gaming license. The voters of Revere should consider this bad behavior when voting on Mohegan Sun’s agreement. Mohegan Sun has a clear history of predatory practices; to assume that they will be different here in Massachusetts would be silly.

 
 

Friday, January 24, 2014

Paul Burns' Palmer Bucket Brigade

Palmer appointed a Citizens Casino Study Committee to assess the costs of hosting Mohegan Sun.

When the CITIZENS, residents of the community determined that the costs would be CONSERVATIVELY + $18 MILLION, not including the estimated $50 MILLION to bring water from the Quabbin, Paul Burns prevented that report from being publicly discussed.



The final host community agreement [HCA] doesn't address water, doesn't address traffic and much else.



The 'FLYOVER' initially promised to prevent traffic from grid-locking the community was not  approved before the PROMISES were made.

Paul Burns revealed his failures to protect Palmer. Palmer voters were wise in defeating this FOLLY!

Mohegan Sun revealed their phony promises Palmer.

Will Revere voters reject the charade as well? 

What's Mohegan Sun's Non-Casino Plan for Palmer?

Date:
01/23/2014
Contributor:
Sam Hudzik
Listen to Sam Hudzik's story
There's still no word from Mohegan Sun on what the casino company plans to do with land it leased in Palmer, Massachusetts. The town's voters rejected a casino referendum in November, and Mohegan is now bidding to build a resort in Revere.

After giving a big presentation Wednesday to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission about Mohegan Sun's casino proposal for Suffolk Downs, the company's CEO Mitchell Etess was in no mood to talk a possible non-casino development in Palmer.

"We think it's a great location and we hope that we can do something there. But honestly you have to - in business - you need to kind of prioritize things," Etess said.

That answer did not impress or surprise Paul Burns, a town councilor in Palmer who supported the casino there but has been very critical of Mohegan Sun's actions since the vote. Burns says Mohegan Sun is a large corporation capable of multitasking.

"I understand that they're in the middle of a competition for a casino license in eastern Mass now, but I don't think it's too much to ask that Mohegan Sun commit to...maybe building a mall or whatever other project that they have planned for the area."

And Burns says if Mohegan won't commit to developing the land, he wants them to step aside so someone else can.

http://nepr.net/news/whats-mohegan-suns-non-casino-plan-palmer

 

Friday, November 29, 2013

Paul Burns makes fool of himself....again! Palmer, Ya Gotta Problem!

A Palmer Citizens Casino Study Committee was appointed to determine the costs of hosting Mohegan Sun.
  

Paul Burns silenced the report that determined the ANNUAL cost would be
 
$18 MILLION to $39 MILLION
 
 
not including the
 
$50 MILLION to bring water from the Quabbin


Palmer lacks the water to provide for the Mohegan Sun proposal.
 
Now, Paul Burns is calling for TRANSPARENCY?





There's that pesky little FLYOVER that never happened.....

Palmer town councilor sends warning letter to Mass. Gaming Commission

Posted: Nov 27, 2013


CBS 3 Springfield - WSHM





PALMER, MA (WSHM) - A town councilor in Palmer sent a letter to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission Monday warning them that Mohegan Sun could not be trusted.
The letter from Paul Burns comes after allegations last week that Mohegan had been in talks with Suffolk Downs about a project there prior to the referendum vote on Nov. 5. Mohegan tribal chairman, Kevin Brown released a statement in response to allegations by Burns, "We find the patently false accusation of Councilor Burns that we were talking to any other parties in Massachusetts before the referendum to be completely inappropriate and hurtful given the hard work of the Mohegan Sun Massachusetts team up to, and importantly, AFTER the referendum. Mohegan Sun and our team in Palmer worked tirelessly over the past five years to bring a world class facility to Palmer and the Commonwealth, invested millions of dollars into this effort, and engaged in a highly transparent process of explaining our project to the community. Despite the long odds that a recount might bring a different result, we have deliberately stayed the course awaiting the outcome. This change in tenor from an elected leader in Palmer is of great concern to us."

Brown announced Wednesday that Mohegan had signed a deal with Suffolk Downs that morning. A recount for the host agreement in Palmer was completed Tuesday afternoon. Burns called the ability to get a new agreement done with Suffolk Downs a "miracle". He said it took them 11 months to get an agreement, but seemingly less than 24 hours to make an agreement in another community.

Brown said the next step was to complete a development plan to give to the gaming commission by the Dec. 31 deadline.

There is still 152 acres of land in Palmer that Mohegan Sun said they wanted to use for a non-gaming commercial venture since they wouldn't be building a casino there. Burns said he firmly believed Mohegan Sun was trying to block potential competitors by taking a prime piece of real estate.

Burns said he would welcome a development plan by Mohegan Sun, but it would have to be done quickly if they wanted any credibility with the community. He said it would take tens of millions of dollars just for infrastructure improvements on the property. Burns also stated the company can't just put a strip mall on the property. Any development would have to be sizeable. He said he would not be opposed to a plan by Mohegan Sun as long as the process was sincere and transparent. Any plan would still have to go through the planning and zoning approval process.

http://www.cbs3springfield.com/story/24087911/palmer-town-councilor-sends-warning-letter-to-mass-gaming-commission

 

Sunday, November 24, 2013

Field Of Casino Competitors Shrinks As Application Deadline Nears



Field Of Casino Competitors Shrinks As Application Deadline Nears

Originally published on Fri November 22, 2013 12:41 pm
 When Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick signed the law two years ago legalizing casino gambling in Massachusetts there were great expectations for thousands of jobs and tens of millions of dollars in tax revenue. Now as the end-of-the year deadline approaches for final applications for gaming licenses there is great uncertainty. 
Credit Credit commons.wikimedia.org


The results of a series of binding voter referendums have left just two or fewer proposed projects for what was expected to be robust competition to build resorts casinos in the eastern and western regions of Massachusetts. Pending background checks on two casino operators have further clouded the future of the fledgling gaming industry in the state.

Earlier this week voters in Milford--a town of 25,000 people about 20 miles west of Boston--rejected by a two-to-one margin a $1 billion casino project proposed by Foxwoods. The vote was the last in a series of binding referendums involving the 11 initial applicants for gaming licenses in Massachusetts.

Voters in the eastern Massachusetts city of Everett in June overwhelmingly approved a casino planned by Wynn Resorts, and in July voters in Springfield by a 52 percent to 48 percent margin endorsed MGM’s plans for a downtown casino development. Voters in Leominster, Plainville and Raynham approved proposals for gambling facilities that will have only slot machines.

But then the casino operators hit a losing streak. In September, West Springfield voters gave thumbs down to a proposal by Hard Rock International. On Election Day voters in both Palmer and East Boston, in what were considered upsets, turned down casino projects.

Mohegan Sun asked for a recount in Palmer that will take place on Tuesday. But the company is seeking to void the exclusive casino development deal it had with a realty company causing casino supporters such as Town Counselor Paul Burns to conclude Mohegan Sun has thrown in the towel.
Chip Tuttle, chief operating officer of Suffolk Downs, confirmed on Thursday that Mohegan Sun is among several companies that have discussed partnering with Suffolk Downs on a revised casino proposal in Revere.

Suffolk, which lost the vote in East Boston, is trying to move the project to neighboring Revere, where voters supported it.

Casino industry expert Clyde Barrow said the odds are long, but the Suffolk Downs casino project might still be viable.

The gaming law allows for one resort casino in the Greater Boston area and one in western Massachusetts along with one slots machine parlor that can be located anywhere.

MGM in the western region and Wynn in the east are the only voter approved projects, but neither has passed the background check and been found “suitable” by the five-member Massachusetts Gaming Commission.

A statewide group says it has secured enough signatures from registered voters to put a question on the November 2014 ballot to repeal the casino law. One of the anti-casino activists Steve Abdow believes the tide is turning against casinos in Massachusetts.

A recent poll by Western New England University found a solid majority of Massachusetts residents still support casino gambling, according to polling institute director Tim Vercellotti.

Just 42 percent of the people surveyed said they would support a casino in their home town.

http://wnpr.org/post/field-casino-competitors-shrinks-application-deadline-nears

 

Saturday, November 23, 2013

Mohegan Sun, Palmer Abuzz.....



Mohegan Sun, owner of Palmer site at odds
By Brian HallenbeckPublication: The Day
Published 11/22/2013
 
Proposed casino site now in dispute
Mohegan Sun has terminated its "exclusivity agreement" with the owner of the Palmer, Mass., land where it hoped to develop a $1 billion resort casino, freeing it to negotiate with potential partners in other casino projects elsewhere in the Bay State.

At the same time, Mohegan Sun's lease of the 152-acre site "remains in full force and effect," the Connecticut casino asserted this week in a letter to Northeast Realty Associates.

Northeast objected to the casino's claims, saying the Mohegans' continued lease of the land would prevent Northeast from making it available to any other developer.

"They want to negotiate with someone else but tie up the land in Palmer," Paul Robbins, a Northeast spokesman, said. "It's like having your cake and eating it, too."

Northeast said it had referred Mohegan's notice to legal counsel.

The Palmer casino proposal was narrowly defeated in a Nov. 5 referendum, prompting a recount of votes set for Tuesday.

"It is unfortunate that Mohegan Sun is abandoning the people of Palmer just days before the recount … so that it can continue to negotiate a possible deal in another locale in Massachusetts," Northeast said. "Mohegan's pursuit of a license in the Eastern Massachusetts zone is at odds with their long-held position that Palmer represents the best location for a resort casino in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. It also violated the exclusivity agreement between the parties."

Earlier this week, Palmer Town Councilor Paul Burns questioned whether Mohegan Sun had talked to other parties in Massachusetts prior to the referendum. Kevin Brown, chairman of the Mohegan Tribal Council, responded in a statement, calling Burns' claims "patently false."

"Mohegan Sun and our team in Palmer worked tirelessly over the past five years to bring a world class facility to Palmer and the Commonwealth, invested millions of dollars into this effort, and engaged in a highly transparent process of explaining our project to the community," Brown said.

"Despite the long odds that a recount might bring a different result, we have deliberately stayed the course awaiting the outcome."


http://www.theday.com/article/20131122/BIZ02/311229925/1044


Mohegans considering non-gaming development in Palmer
By Brian HallenbeckPublication: theday.com
Published 11/22/2013
 
Mohegan Sun will consider a non-gaming development at the 152-acre site in Palmer, Mass., where it had hoped to develop a $1 billion resort casino, the gaming operator’s top executive said Friday.
“As far as Palmer goes, we’ve invested almost $25 million in the whole process, a lot of it involving the land,” Mitchell Etess, the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority’s chief executive officer, said Friday. “Millions and millions has gone to the landlord. … We believe it’s a good site for development.”
Mohegan Sun signed a 99-year lease on the property in 2008.
Voters in Palmer rejected the casino proposal by 93 votes in a Nov. 5 referendum. A recount sought by Mohegan Sun and supporters of the project is scheduled for Tuesday. It is not expected to change the referendum outcome.
The Mohegan Sun Massachusetts plan included a 70,000-square-foot indoor-outdoor water park, two hotels and 300,000 square feet of retail development. Presumably, those portions of the project still could be pursued at the site, though Etess declined to discuss what the Mohegan Tribe has in mind.
“We could develop something other than gaming there,” Etess said. “It depends. We’ll have to take some time to assess what’s possible. … Everyone in Palmer liked the water park idea.”
Mohegan Sun has informed Northeast Realty Group, the owner of the property, that it was terminating its “exclusivity agreement” with Northeast, freeing the casino operator to negotiate with potential partners involved in other casino projects in Massachusetts.
Mohegan Sun has been in talks with owners of Suffolk Downs, the Boston-area race track hoping to propose a project in Revere.
Northeast Realty is free to pursue another developer of the Palmer site, Etess said, even though Mohegan Sun continues to lease it.
“They’d just have to go through us,” he said of anyone interested in the property.

http://www.theday.com/article/20131122/BIZ02/131129881/1047


Palmer Residents React to Mohegan Sun's Possibly Leaving Town abc40
(PALMER, Mass.) (WGGB)–Mohegan Sun wants out of its exclusive agreement with the town of Palmer to building a casino. Mohegan Sun had big plans for the ...
 
Northeast Realty: Mohegan Sun wants to break exclusive casino ... MassLive.com
PALMER - Mohegan Sun wants to end its exclusive casino agreement with Northeast Realty but continue to lease the 152 acres on Thorndike Street (Route 32), ...
 
Mohegan Sun seeks end to Palmer deal GazetteNET
In an earlier statement, Mohegan Sun rebutted suggestions by Palmer casino supporters that it had negotiated with Suffolk Down prior to the Nov. 5 referendum.
 
Mohegan Sun Addresses Future Plans for Palmer Site abc40
PALMER, Mass. (WGGB) — While they may not build a casino in Palmer, Mohegan Sun has announced their plans for the land on which they currently hold a ...
 
Mohegan Sun seeks break of exclusivity in Palmer WSHM-TV
While Etess did not confirm Mohegan is pursuing a casino in the eastern part of the state, he said they are seeking a break in their exclusivity in Palmer, without ...
 
Mohegan Sun looks for non-gaming development in Palmer WSHM-TV
Mohegan Sun announced it'll explore non-gaming projects at the site it has leased in Palmer. Suffolk Downs race track near Boston says it has been in contact ...
 
Mohegan seeks to end Palmer agreement, keep land WWLP 22News
Northeast Realty Associates, owner of the 152 acre parcel in Palmer and site of Mohegan Sun's proposed resort casino, today issued a statement as a result of ...
 
Mass. Gov. says casino law working as it should Businessweek
The vote came on the heels of rejections of proposed casinos earlier this month by voters in East Boston and Palmer, and in September by West Springfield ...
 
 

Friday, November 22, 2013

Still, no one asks about illegal Palmer PAC!


Not one single media source has asked where the $$$ for

Citizens for Jobs and Growth in Palmer 

comes from, why they are NOT a registered PAC and no reporting is available.

Northeast Realty: Mohegan Sun wants to break exclusive casino agreement, but continue to lease Palmer land


Palmer rejects Mohegan Sun Casino
11/05/13 Palmer - Mohegan Sun supporters in Palmer await results on Nov. 5. (The Republican / Michael Beswick)
Lori Stabile, The Republican By Lori Stabile, The RepublicanThe Republican
on November 21, 2013
 

Casinos



PALMER - Mohegan Sun wants to end its exclusive casino agreement with Northeast Realty but continue to lease the 152 acres on Thorndike Street (Route 32), making it unavailable for other economic or casino development, Northeast representatives said Thursday.

The news comes amid several calls for Mohegan to answer to rumors that the Connecticut-based company may be involved in talks with Suffolk Downs for its Revere casino proposal, even though a recount of the failed Palmer vote has not yet been held.

The recount is slated for Tuesday.

"Clearly if Mohegan is trying to void the exclusivity agreement, they clearly have interest somewhere else in Massachusetts," At-large Town Councilor Paul E. Burns said.

Burns said it is "insulting" to Palmer to "come in here and run the kind of campaign they did and walk away and try to hold that land forever," a move that could prevent economic development, or another casino company from coming in.

Mohegan signed a 99-year lease with Northeast on the 152 acres in 2008, with the hope that it could build a resort casino there. But voters on Nov. 5 rejected the casino by less than 100 votes.

A statement issued by Northeast reads in part: "It is unfortunate that Mohegan Sun is abandoning the people of Palmer just days before the recount of the recent referendum, so that it can continue to negotiate a possible deal in another locale in Massachusetts, now that those negotiations have come to light through press reports.

"Mohegan’s pursuit of a license in the Eastern Massachusetts zone is at odds with their long-held position that Palmer represents the best location for a resort casino in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. It also violated the exclusivity agreement between the parties."

But the company on Tuesday issued a statement in response to Burns' concerns about Suffolk, calling his statements false, inappropriate and hurtful.

Leon H. Dragone, Northeast's manager, wants to know if Mohegan was engaged in discussions or negotiations with Suffolk before the Nov. 5 vote.

"I think that would call into question the integrity of their management of the campaign," Dragone said.

Sources close to Northeast said Mohegan could give 90 days notice to get out of the lease.

A Suffolk representative said their goal is to identify a new gaming partner by the end of the month.
Chip Tuttle, chief operating officer of Suffolk Downs, confirmed on Thursday that Mohegan Sun is among several companies that have discussed partnering with Suffolk Downs on a revised casino proposal in Revere.

The release from Northeast, which came from Paul Robbins Associates, blasts Mohegan, saying the pursuit of another license in Revere "represents another demonstration of Mohegan's pattern of underperformance relating to the town of Palmer and its citizens."

It notes that while Mohegan was the first applicant to establish a presence in Western Massachusetts and pledged to be the first to have a host community agreement and referendum, it "supplied the required $400,000 application fee at the eleventh hour" and was slow to reveal casino project details despite requests to do so by town officials and citizens.

“Mohegan was among the last to finalize a host community agreement, after publicly promising to be the first. They were among the last to bring the agreement to voters. Unlike their counterpart applicants, they did not seek community input in Palmer or engage the people of Palmer in the design of their proposed resort.

“At the end of the day, Mohegan was slow to act and seemingly more interested in protecting their flagship casino in Connecticut than vigorously pursuing the Palmer project. Now, with the Palmer vote still undetermined they appear anxious to apply through a host community agreement and referendum that they did not have to win on their own," Northeast's release states.

The release also stated that during the negotiations with Northeast on the Palmer land lease, Northeast was aware of reports that Mohegan was actively looking at other venues in Massachusetts, and that Mohegan paid former mayor Michael Albano as a consultant during this period and continued to pay him as a consultant until he took office as a Governor’s Councilor.

"It is unclear what Mr. Albano’s role with Mohegan Sun was during the period of time he was paid as their consultant in Massachusetts, but it is very clear he was not involved in the Palmer referendum campaign,” Robbins added in the statement, citing the alleged arrangement as another example of Mohegan’s duplicity.

Albano, of Longmeadow, was elected to the Governor’s Council in 2011. Recently, he won a $10,000 contract with the town of East Longmeadow to advise municipal officials on the potential impact on the community if an MGM resort casino is located in Springfield.

In response, Albano said, “I haven’t seen Paul Robbins in 12 years, and if I have it wasn’t that memorable of a meeting but I now understand now why he left political consulting,” refusing further comment.

Albano previously denied having been compensated by Mohegan or any related entity.
Officials for the casino company and the tribe did not return calls for comment.

Citizens for Jobs and Growth in Palmer, a pro-casino group, released a letter sent to the Mohegan Tribal Council this week that was signed by 24 people asking Mohegan to adjust the host community agreement to reflect "core groups in town, like the teachers" and to continue to negotiate with surrounding communities.

Jennifer L. Baruffaldi, a spokeswoman for the group, said they still want to see a casino project happen at that site, and would support another casino operator coming in. She said she is concerned about Mohegan being involved with Suffolk Downs.

"If they started courting somebody else, it's like leaving a bride at the altar," Baruffaldi said.

Staff writer Stephanie Barry and the Associated Press contributed to this report.



This is a developing story that will be updated as our reporting continues.

http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2013/11/northeast_realty_mohegan_sun_w.html



Company of the Month: Finard Properties marches forth - A trademark style of doing business

Boston, MA While the news that the residents of Palmer, Mass. had (slimly) voted down Mohegan Sun Casino's proposal for a world-class destination casino resort came as a disappointment to Todd Finard, the ambitious CEO of Finard Properties, the Boston-based, commercial real estate development company in partnership with Mohegan, didn't miss a beat. The next day, he and Mitchell Etess, CEO of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming authority, were meeting to discuss the possibility of keeping their partnership in tact - all while awaiting the re-count of the Palmer vote, which was scheduled later in the month. With a solid and sound partnership in place, Finard and Mohegan wasted no time mourning the potential defeat in Palmer, and instead scheduled a trip to Pennsylvania to tour Mohegan's existing operation in the Poconos.

"Finard Properties is and has been successful because we see opportunity, first and foremost - and we see a tremendous opportunity in continuing a strong partnership with Mohegan Sun," said Finard.

"We are excited to get back to the table and are optimistic that down the road, we can work together to develop a premiere tourist destination in the State of Massachusetts."

"There isn't a better, more experienced and more successful retail developer than Finard Properties," said Etess. "The portfolio of hugely successful Finard Properties' developments is spread literally throughout every corner of New England and beyond. Their creativity and expertise is a huge asset to our continued pursuit of a casino complex in Massachusetts."

This "march forth" style of doing business is trademark Finard and is one of the reasons for the company's impressive growth since its humble beginnings.

Founded in the 1950s, Murray Finard recognized an opportunity to simplify the shopping experience for the masses that were migrating to suburbia: he put all the stores under one roof. It wasn't long before shopping centers were a cornerstone of just about every town in America.

In the 1970s, Murray was joined in the business by his son Bill, who carried the company to the next level by adding new property development /property management components and evolving strategically with an ever-shifting demographic and the continuing influx of new technology. His son, Todd, came aboard in 1996; his son-in-law, Robert Hughes, also joined the company in 2007.

Now three generation out, the company is aggressively pursuing growth, yet firmly adhering to its core values of integrity and forthright business practices - and the pride that comes with the fact that the company bears the family name. Characterized by innovation, insight, creative out-of-the-box thinking and good old-fashioned hard work, Finard Properties "marches forth" with its commitment to identify new opportunities for growth and constantly evolve into new markets and into new marketplaces.

As CEO, Todd Finard is responsible for the strategic planning and ongoing growth of the company's portfolio. He has outlined a carefully-executed plan for expansion - one which includes bringing in capital for projects they have on the table. Finard recognizes that the company's projections for an accelerated growth trajectory require that they actively court institutional investors and joint equity partners. "In exchange for access to capital, we offer great yields," said Finard. "We have targeted projects that, once developed, marketed and managed correctly will very likely exceed conservative estimates for return. We have a portfolio of properties that our market analysis tells us should be developed."

Finard also spearheaded the company's move into downtown Boston in 2011. "We saw the upside to being closer to our financial partners," he said.

While their short term goal is to finalize a deal with Mohegan Sun, Finard Properties remains focused and committed to the properties they own and manage in all sectors.

Hospitality

Formed in 2011, Finard Coventry Hotel Management merged the talents of Finard Properties with those of Coventry Hotel Associates and offers a full spectrum of services for the hospitality industry - from acquisition and development to operations, franchisor relations, asset management, strategic sales/marketing plans and consulting. FCHM currently owns and/or manages: The Harbor Hotel, Provincetown, Mass.; The Sundance Resort, Sundance, UT; The Providence Biltmore (which is currently undergoing a $13 million restoration in a joint venture with Angelo, Gordon & Company) and has recently announced their newest project: a 170-room Residence Inn at the New England Executive Park in Burlington, Mass. Groundbreaking is set for the summer of 2014.

Retail

In the mid-1980s, the First National Bank of Boston approached William Finard about taking over two under-performing shopping malls in Memphis, Tenn. If this born and bred New Englander felt out of place in the South, it didn't show; Finard turned both into successful retail assets. Finard Properties is still at it: the company recently razed a portion of one of the complexes and has just completed the construction of an 85,000 s/f Kroger's, a strong anchor for the newly refurbished shopping center. "This is just one example of how the company has its finger on the pulse of the properties we own and/or manage," said Todd Finard. "In this case, the property had reached the point where it could go one of two ways. It was 30 or 40-years-old and needed to be recreated to be vital and profitable. We are constantly evaluating the landscape of the markets we are in and the markets where we see as emerging. This is another way to spot opportunity and remain active in competitive markets."

The University Mall in South Burlington, Vt. is another major, retail redevelopment project that is on Finard's white board. The largest enclosed mall in the state, the complex is a classic 1980s mall, according to Finard. The company is considering the future evolution of the mall, one that will keep it exciting to shoppers and attractive to tenants.

Office

Finard Properties' portfolio of office complexes includes sites in New England and Tennessee. As with all the properties they own and manage, Finard is ready to spring into action when market conditions dictate a change. Take for instance One Monument Square in downtown Portland, Me. When this 10-story, 124,000 s/f office building lost its key tenant last year, Finard recognized the need to refurbish the 1970s design in order to be competitive and attract the right mix of long-term tenants. Along with the major renovation, the building was rebranded, renamed (Square One) and is now nearly fully occupied.

Three generations have successfully steered Finard Properties from owning one humble shopping center to owning, managing and developing an impressive portfolio of properties in nearly every sector of commercial real estate. They are, for sure, a company to watch for generations to come.

http://nerej.com/67460

 

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Mohegan Sun: 67.1% Plunge in Profits; Paul Burns: Jilted Lover



Palmer town leader has doubts about Mohegan Sun

Posted: Nov 19, 2013


CBS 3 Springfield - WSHM

PALMER, MA (WSHM) -
Palmer Town Councilor Paul burns wants to know if Mohegan Sun was fully committed to his town.

On Tuesday, Burns said he had heard rumors that Mohegan Sun was talking to Suffolk Downs in the Boston area prior to the referendum vote in Palmer two weeks ago.

Voters in Palmer shot down Mohegan Sun's $1 billion proposal by just 93 votes on Nov. 5. There was a recount scheduled for Nov. 26. Mohegan Sun pushed for the recount because of reported concerns over a voting machine.

Burns said he had heard Mohegan Sun was talking with Suffolk Downs to possibly replace Caesars Entertainment.

Suffolk Downs dropped Caesars Entertainment three weeks before a scheduled vote over doubts the company would pass a state background check. The property straddles east Boston and Revere.

Voters in east Boston rejected a casino while residents in Revere passed the measure by an overwhelming margin.
In Massachusetts, casinos are only allowed to operate one venue in the state. Even if the recount in Palmer reverses the outcome, Mohegan Sun would have to choose one community.

Burns said he reached out to Mohegan Sun for a response but had not heard anything back. CBS 3 Springfield asked Mohegan Sun and Suffolk Downs for a comment, but neither would confirm the two were talking.

http://www.cbs3springfield.com/story/24014343/palmer-town-leader-has-doubts-about-mohegan-sun

Revenues, profits decline for Mohegans
By Brian Hallenbeck
Publication: theday.com
Published 11/20/2013
 
 Mohegan — Despite reporting overall declines in revenue and profit in the quarter that ended Sept. 30, Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority executives said Wednesday that they were pleased with the results given the economic climate.

In a conference call with investors and gaming industry analysts, they also touted recent refinancing initiatives and last week’s opening of a new hotel at Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs near Wilkes-Barre, Pa.

The authority operates Mohegan Sun in Uncasville as well as the Pennsylvania property.

Consolidated results for July, August and September — the fourth quarter of the authority’s fiscal year — show adjusted EBITDA, or earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, totaled $77.2 million, down 4.7 percent over the same quarter the previous year.
Net income, or profit, was $4.9 million, a 67.1 percent decrease from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

http://www.theday.com/article/20131120/BIZ02/131129968/1047


Mohegan Sun casino posts plunge in 4Q profit

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Palmer Sore Losers Demand Recount!

BUT, BUT, BUT.....we schmoozed, stroked egos, kissed butts, gave you FREE FOOD.....How can you VOTE NO?




POOR MOHEGAN SUN! Anxious to suck discretionary income from the PALMER LOCALS  to support their debt in Connecticut can't understand HOW...WHY voters didn't LOVE THEM after spending MILLIONS to be LOVED!

 

'So what we don't have any WATER!


So what we don't have a flyover!

All of the local media was in LOVE WITH US! Palmer voters just don't 'get it'!
What's not to love about low wage jobs, insurmountable traffic jams, Gambling Addiction like you've never seen before.....We PROMISED you EVERYTHING!' 



Supporters for a recount on the Mohegan Sun Massachusetts casino project have filed signatures with the town clerk


http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2013/11/supporters_for_a_recount_on_th.html


 
 
 



 
Has any single journalist asked about 'Citizens for Jobs & Growth'?
Where's the $$$ coming from?
Are they are registered PAC?
Where is their reporting of $$$?

This is what happens when journalists and the media become Gambling Cheerleaders and ignore their responsibilities and violations of the LAWS!




 

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

When Will Palmer File An Ethics Complaint?


Please watch the video accompanying the article. Councilman Burns's endorsement for the casino is done INSIDE Converse Middle School. I really hope that wasn't spoken during voting hours today, or that would be an obvious breach of the limit of 150 feet for promotion on the issue.




Sunday, October 27, 2013

UNREGISTERED AND ILLEGAL PAC IN PALMER? MEDIA SILENT?

Mohegan Sun is another monster mired in debt.

Sun's Mass. casino vote may be too close to call
By Brian Hallenbeck
Publication: The Day

Published 10/27/2013
 
Palmer, Mass. - For more than 15 years, people here have confronted the prospect of a resort casino in their midst.

In polls and in a nonbinding referendum, they've supported the notion. But now, on the verge of a Nov. 5 vote on Mohegan Sun's plan for a $1 billion casino-water park development, few are eager to predict the outcome.

It's no longer about a notion, they say. This referendum's binding.

If the pro-casino "Vote Yes for Palmer" forces out-poll their "CasiNO" counterparts, Mohegan Sun and its partners will continue to pursue the western Massachusetts casino license Bay State gaming
regulators are expected to award in the spring.

If project opponents prevail, Mohegan Sun can close its Main Street office and get out of town.

"We've done two or three polls out there in the past and every one showed overwhelming support for hosting a casino in Palmer," Clyde Barrow, director of the Center for Policy Analysis at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, said last week. "But we've seen over and over that even when polls show large margins in favor of casinos, the actual votes are a lot closer. Opponents are often more motivated (than proponents) to come out and actually vote."

So while polls conducted in Palmer in 2008, 2009 and 2010 revealed growing support for a casino - percentages in favor were 55, 60 and 64 percent, respectively - Barrow is banking on an Election Day nail-biter.

"I think it will be decided by 1 or 2 percent," he said. "Right now, the polls in the past indicate it should pass."

Paul Burns, one of two town councilors who have come out in support of the Mohegan Sun Massachusetts project, believes the town's long-running consideration of a casino is another reason the vote's unlikely to be lopsided.

While Paul Burns has been prime casino cheerleaders [perhaps violating Massachusetts Ethics Rules], he helped bury the Palmer Citizens Casino Study Committee Report that determined the annual cost to host would exceed the phony promises. 

And what about the WATER?

"Palmer has studied it more than any other community," Burns said. "I wouldn't be upset with a tight margin - it would just be a sign that people have done their homework. When you have an extremely informed electorate, they're not going to be easily swayed.

"Don't look for an Everett margin here," he said, referring to a June referendum in the Greater Boston city of Everett, where more than 86 percent of voters approved Wynn Resorts' casino proposal. "In Everett, they didn't have time to study it."

While he'd be happy with a narrow victory, Burns said he thinks Palmer voters will approve the Mohegan Sun Massachusetts proposal by a margin of 8 to 10 percentage points. He predicted a turnout of 32 percent to 40 percent, which he said would be "huge" for a local election. No offices are up for election. Ballots will pose only the casino question.

Members of Quaboag Valley Against Casinos, the leading anti-casino group operating in Palmer, say they've been gaining momentum. They acknowledge, too, that they're fighting an uphill battle.

"We're a silent majority," said Iris Cardin, the group's co-president. "We're coming out now. There are more anti-casino people than in the past. ... No one expected Hard Rock to be defeated."

Cardin's underdog opposition might have gotten a boost, at least psychologically, from a September referendum in West Springfield, where voters shot down a Hard Rock International casino proposal by a 55-45 margin. That outcome narrowed the field vying for the western Massachusetts casino license to two: Mohegan Sun Massachusetts and MGM Resorts International, which won a July referendum on its Springfield project with nearly 58 percent of the vote.

"I've lived here all my life," the 67-year-old Cardin said. "We're a family-oriented town. Why would we want a casino to ruin it?"

Mike Eagan, a spokesman for Cardin's group, said casino opponents have been making inroads.
"I think we're doing well," he said on a recent Saturday, picketing at the busy intersection of Thorndike and Main streets. "The more you know about a casino, the more unlikely it is that you're going to want one in your community."

Economic benefits, social costs

While casino opponents typically focus on the quality-of-life issues associated with gambling - addiction, crime, traffic and casinos' effects on surrounding small businesses - casino operators tout the revenue and jobs they generate. Governments tend to find the promise of economic benefits irresistible.

Mohegan Sun's "host community agreement" with Palmer, for example, seemed to more than satisfy town officials. The pact calls for the casino to dole out nearly $3 million in upfront payments, as well as annual payments of $15.2 million plus 0.25 percent of the casino's first $400 million in gaming revenue and 2 percent of the revenue beyond $400 million.

Based on Mohegan Sun's projections, total casino revenue for Palmer would top $18 million in the casino's first year of operation.

In addition, the agreement calls for Mohegan Sun to foot the bill for more than $41 million worth of infrastructure improvements to water and sewer systems, the Exit 8 interchange of the Massachusetts Turnpike and local roadways.

The town has an annual budget of about $33 million, of which $15.3 million is derived from local property taxes, according to Charlie Blanchard, the town manager.

After tapping the projected casino windfall to cover "mitigation" costs - expenses incurred because of the casino's impact on services such as police and fire protection - the town still would have more than $12 million a year at its disposal to fund improvements and lower property taxes, Blanchard has calculated.

If the Town Council raised the budget of each town department, including schools, by 15 percent, reduced sewer fees by 10 percent, paid for the town's new police station, funded a bridge repair program and put $1 million a year into the town's "Stabilization Fund," it could still cut property taxes by more than 40 percent, the town manager wrote in an op-ed piece last month.

"There may be reasons why people would decide not to vote in favor of having a casino in Palmer," Blanchard wrote, "… but the host community agreement and the fiscal improvement it would bring should not be one of them."

Mitchell Etess, chief executive officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, which operates Mohegan Sun in Uncasville and Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., said the project's economic impact on the town would be "truly transformative."

He said he's "very confident" that Palmer will vote in favor of the "once-in-a-lifetime" opportunity the project represents. "I don't know of anything that could be built anywhere that could have so much beneficial impact on a community," he said. "And we've made every effort to minimize the
(negative) impact."

If signs voted

The town's casino supporters, many of whom are members of Citizens for Jobs and Growth in Palmer, have been monitoring the casino-approval process for years. The group formed in the spring of 2010 and has been working in conjunction with Mohegan Sun's own "Vote Yes for Palmer" campaign since the signing of the host community agreement.

WHERE IS Citizens for Jobs and Growth
 REGISTERED AS A PAC?
WHERE IS Citizens for Jobs and Growth
REPORTING THEIR $$$$?

WHERE IS Citizens for Jobs and Growth
TRANSPARENT AND LEGAL?

WHO IS PAYING JENNIFER BARUFFALDI'S SALARY?

WHO IS ASKING? WHY ISN'T THE MEDIA CONDUCTING THEIR DUE DILIGENCE?

"We're happy to carry their signs," Jennifer Baruffaldi, the citizens group's spokeswoman, said.
If signs could vote, the referendum outcome would seem assured. In recent weeks, pro-casino placards planted on residential lawns and in merchants' windows have overwhelmingly outnumbered those placed by casino opponents.

Both sides also have taken to Facebook and the radio airwaves, staged public rallies and courted news coverage. Quaboag Valley Against Casinos hosted an appearance this month by former southeastern Connecticut congressman Robert Steele, whose book, "The Curse: Big Time Gambling's Seduction of Small Town New England," takes a dim view of gaming's impact.

Cardin, the anti-casino group's co-president, said Steele warned that a Palmer casino would make it difficult for small businesses in the surrounding area to survive.

It might be hard to dispute, however, that the Mohegan Sun Massachusetts project is spurring ancillary development right next door. Northeast Realty, which owns the property leased by Mohegan Sun, also controls adjacent parcels totaling another 150 acres on which it plans to develop restaurants, retail space, hotels and offices requiring $150 million worth of investment.

The development is going forward regardless of whether the Mohegan Sun Massachusetts project materializes, according to Northeast's manager, Leon Dragone.

Those on both sides of the referendum question might agree that the Nov. 5 vote is strictly about Palmer's willingness to host Mohegan Sun Massachusetts.

"It has absolutely nothing to do with West Springfield or Springfield," said Etess, the MTGA executive, who declined to comment on reports that West Springfield activists who opposed the casino project there have joined the pro-casino camp in Palmer. Presumably, such activists would prefer a casino to be built in Palmer rather than Springfield.

If Mohegan Sun Massachusetts clears the referendum hurdle, the project's proponents can be expected to concentrate on comparing it - favorably - to MGM Resorts' Springfield proposal. They undoubtedly would highlight the Mohegan Sun project's water park component and the way the project partners sailed through the gaming commission's background checks, earning "suitable" designations.

The suitability process snagged the Suffolk Downs casino plan in East Boston, prompting the license applicants to drop Caesars Entertainment from the project and raising questions about whether other international operators, including MGM Resorts, would have trouble passing muster with the commission.

Casino opponents in Palmer aren't going to disappear if they lose the referendum vote. Many, including Cardin, the Quaboag Valley Against Casinos co-president, are also involved in an effort to repeal the 2011 law that authorized casinos in Massachusetts. The citizen's group Repeal the Casino Deal is hoping to have a referendum question placed on statewide ballots in the November 2014 election.


http://www.theday.com/article/20131027/BIZ02/310279905/1017