Showing posts with label Stop the Casino 101 Coalition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stop the Casino 101 Coalition. Show all posts
Friday, May 10, 2013
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
TEN THINGS EVERY BUSINESSMAN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CASINOS
TEN THINGS EVERY BUSINESSMAN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CASINOS: CASINOS CREATE CRIME -In Sacramento, DUI's on the approach roads to the Thunder Valley casino were up 600% in the first year of operation (CHP). According to CityRating.com, crime statistics in Lincoln, CA, home of Thunder Valley casino show an overall upward trend in crime based on data from 11 years, with violent crime increasing and property crime increasing. The crime rate in Lincoln for 2013 is expected to be higher than in 2010. In Atlantic City, crime increased 258% after the casinos opened. (National Institute of Justice).
Friday, May 3, 2013
Thursday, April 25, 2013
Atlantic City: The Poster Child for Predatory Gambling
THE CASINO & HOMELESSNESS: Amherst Professor Dr. Robert Goodman reported that “"...in Atlantic City, homelessness increased after the introduction of casinos, while clothing stores and eating and drinking establishments declined. Only a few (new) retail stores opened in the off-Boardwalk and downtown areas."
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Religious position
DID YOU KNOW…Every one of the world’s major religions - Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism and Christianity - speaks against gambling: . Thousands of years of wisdom, but will we listen?
Thursday, February 21, 2013
Social Justice-Impact on the Poor
The families living in low-income housing near the Graton Rancheria casino will bear the brunt of the traffic, noise, and pollution problems that will happen because of the casino. Let’s not add another burden to the lives of those in need – stop the Graton Rancheria Casino! http:// www.stopthecasino101.com/ id72.html
Social Justice-Impact on the
Poor
Social Justice-Impact on the
Poor

Creating a Ghetto on Rohnert Park's West
Side: What the casino will do to Rohnert Park's low-income families and
children.

West Side Story.....
Rohnert Park's poor families will suffer the greatest impact from
the casino proposed by the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria.
Rohnert Park's low-income housing is located primarily on the west side of
Highway 101, and most of that housing is less than 1/4 mile from the casino
site. Five low-income developments now exist near the casino site west of 101 in
Rohnert Park, and more low- to very low-income housing is planned for the West
Side in the next ten years, all of it less than 1/4 mile from the casino.
On the east side of the freeway, Rohnert Park's more affluent
neighborhoods are graced with thirteen beautiful parks, many with swimming pools
and tennis courts. But on the west side of the freeway, it's a different story.
There are no parks, no pools, and no tennis courts for the city's thousands of
low-income residents, and now Rohnert Park's low- income families will have to
bear the brunt of the mega-casino's impacts on traffic, and noise and air
pollution, as well as the increase in crime and prostitution the casino will
surely bring.
But that's not all:
Gambling Addiction and Low-Income and
Minorities: According to a recent study by the University of Buffalo Research
Institute on Addiction, "...individuals who live within ten miles of a casino or
are in a disadvantaged neighborhood are more likely to experience problem
gambling...." - a double whammy for the residents on Rohnert Park's West Side.
Families in Rancho Verde Mobile Home Park, one of several low-income housing
developments on Rohnert Park's West Side, would have the casino literally in
their back yards, and the Park's children will be exposed to the negative
impacts from the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria's mega-casino on a daily
basis.
University of Buffalo study (PDF)-Click
Here

Asthma and the Casino:
Did you know that
Rohnert Park has the highest rate of asthma, especially in children, in Sonoma
County? Asthma disproportionately impacts
low-income communities and communities of color. Casino traffic will dump over
4 tons of NOx into the air every single year, as well as soot and other
pollutants. Asthma affects people from all walks of life, but, low-income and
minority populations have much higher fatality rates, hospital admmissions, and
emergency rooms visits due to asthma.

http://www.stopthecasino101.com/id72.html
Social Justice-Impact on the
Poor
Social Justice-Impact on the
Poor
Creating a Ghetto on Rohnert Park's West
Side: What the casino will do to Rohnert Park's low-income families and
children.
| ||||
|
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Water Rights

Stop the Casino 101 Coalition shared a link.
Did you know that your rights to the natural water reserves in the area are in jeopardy due to the supporters behind the Casino project? Unless we fight this casino, you might find yourself in court with your lawyer fighting for your water ...against the tribe, and we may have to deal with a future of mandatory conservation laws. For more information please click on the link.
Not even Native American....

Greg Sarris is not a Native American: his cousin, Ms. Navarro has written a four-page declaration regarding her ancestry and family ethnicity. We’ve posted the testimony on our website so you can see the facts for yourself. Share this post and the follow link with your friends so they too will know the truth about Greg Sarris. Story: http:// www.stopthecasino101.com/ id147.html

Monday, January 21, 2013
Monday, October 29, 2012
The biggest bingo parlor in history!
From: Stop the Casino 101 Coalition
The biggest bingo parlor in history!
The Biggest, Most
Expensive Bingo Parlor in U.S. History!
Compact lawsuit moves forward after first
hearing!
Let me make one thing
perfectly clear: our first lawsuit against Governor Brown's illegal gambling
compact is going forward full-steam ahead.
Our lawsuit passed its first
milestone with its first hearing on October 12, and we're moving forward with
our Complaint intact!
We are challenging the validity
of the Graton Rancheria compact, specifically, that under California law, the
state legislature MUST cede sovereignty over the land to the federal government.
Until then, it isn't Indian land,
and is still governed by State law, and state law does not allow casino-style
gambling except on Indian land. Get it?
No Compact means no casino-style
gambling.
When we win this lawsuit,
Station Casinos and Graton Rancheria will be left with the biggest, most
expensive bingo parlor in U.S. history!
But it all takes money,
honey! So give right now, and be as generous as you can. If you really
want to stop the casino, you have to be willing to cough up come cash.
County's "Wimpy" Deal with the Casino
The County's deal
with Graton Rancheria reminds me of Wimpy who would say to Popeye, "I will
gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today".
The fatal flaw in any agreement
for payments from Graton Rancheria is that they don't have to pay if they don't
make enough money, and there is no independent auditing mechanism to check the
figures.
As was made clear in the hearings
in Sacramento in May, Graton doesn't have to allow anyone on its property to
audit the books, state officials included.
And "wimpy" certainly describes
the County's casino policy. Had the County fought vigorously and asked for
Senator Feinstein's help at any point along the way, as Contra Costa County did
in its battle against the San Pablo casino, it could have stopped the casino
dead.
Fortunately, Stop the
Casino 101 Coalition has stepped in to intervene when the County would not.
Help us do what the
county lacked the guts to do! We'll fight in court for you!
http://www.stopthecasino101.com/
Saturday, October 20, 2012
The Community Voted NO!
From: Stop the Casino 101 Coalition:
Tribal casino to pay at least $9 million a year to Sonoma County
Graton Rancheria could pay up to $38 million more in deal to offset Rohnert Park casino impacts
By JEREMY HAY
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
10/20/2012
Published: Saturday, October 20, 2012
The tribe building a casino in Rohnert Park has agreed to pay at least $9 million annually to Sonoma County to offset the impacts of the project, plus up to $38 million more a year if its revenues hit projections.
Facts
TRIBAL PAYMENTS TO SONOMA COUNTY
Under an agreement that Sonoma County supervisors are to take up on Tuesday, the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria would make a series of payments to the county, including:
ANNUAL PAYMENTS
$3.1 million for law, justice, public safety and tribal relations.
$2 million to the Sonoma
County Transportation Authority to complete work on the Marin-Sonoma Narrows project on Highway 101. After the 10th year, or following completion of that project, the tribe would pay $2 million annually to fund projects on 101 between Highway 12 and the Sonoma- Marin County line or other arterial roads serving casino.
$1.79 million to be paid as development and mitigation fee programs. The payment is equivalent to what a commercial developer would pay in order to obtain a permit.
$1 million to fire districts.
$700,000 to be paid in lieu of county transient occupancy tax once a planned hotel opens.
$600,000 for education, prevention and treatment programs to address gambling addiction and problems associated with substance abuse, mental illness, elder abuse, domestic violence and child abuse and neglect.
$500,000 to mitigate the impacts on local roads within a two-mile radius of the casino.
$416,918 to mitigate crime impacts. Santa Rosa will receive $286,923; Petaluma, $102,591; Sebastopol, $14,596; Cotati, $12,808.
$275,000 for a water conservation program.
ONE-TIME PAYMENTS
The tribe's proposed one-time payments to the county include:
$1.7 million to hire and train four new sheriff's deputies and purchase two new sheriff's vehicles.
$1.5 million for fire and emergency services.
$1.5 million for measures to offset the project's groundwater use.
$370,000 for traffic improvements near the casino.
$60,000 for "tribal relations."
The payments from the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, some of which would start this year, are nearly four times what the county previously estimated it would get.
And they are separate from those laid out in a 2003 agreement between the tribe and Rohnert Park, under which the tribe is to pay the city about $200 million over 20 years.
“Without a doubt, I think it's the best agreement that's ever happened between a tribe and a local government,” said Shirlee Zane, chairwoman of the county Board of Supervisors. She lauded the tribe for its participation.
“I think they've set a good role model for other tribal agreements in the future,” she said. “The tribe has been continually trying to put their best foot forward in terms of negotiating and really giving back to the community.”
The county in 2008 concluded that although it opposed the casino, it could not stop it, and reached a deal with the tribe to negotiate payments to address its impacts. Those negotiations led to the agreement announced Friday.
The casino, with a maximum of 3,000 slot machines, is projected to open next year. The tribe secured $850 million in financing in August.
Of the money the county would get, Santa Rosa, Petaluma, Sebastopol and Cotati would share $416,000 a year for law enforcement, and county fire districts would split $1 million.
Page 2 of 4
Also the tribe is to make one-time payments totaling $5.1 million, mainly to address costs associated with public safety, traffic improvements and measures aimed at addressing the casino's anticipated impact on groundwater supplies.
An initial payment of $3.52 million is expected to come in January to cover public safety costs, including the hiring of four new sheriff's deputies.
The agreement extends for 20 years, the term of the gambling compact between the state and Graton Rancheria that allows the tribe to operate a Las Vegas-style casino. That compact required the tribe to sign agreements with the county and Rohnert Park before opening the casino.
Work on the project started in June and its steel framework began rising on 66 acres last week.
The board is to vote on the agreement Tuesday. Zane wouldn't predict the outcome of that vote, but she said the agreement, reached after 3½ months of negotiations, achieved everything the county wanted and more.
“This agreement has met, I believe, every single concern that we've put forward in terms of mitigation,” she said.
“In addition to that, there are community benefit dollars that will come back to the county for mutual interests,” she said, referring to money that the tribe would give the county, primarily for open space projects, if it has money left over after its payments to the state, county and Rohnert Park.
In practice, the tribe is to pay, for the first seven years of operation, 15 percent of its net earnings from gambling to the state into a Graton Mitigation Fund. After seven years, that drops to 12 percent. The state then distributes that fund to Rohnert Park and the county.
Page 3 of 4
In April, the state and tribe projected those earnings, known as net win, as $350 million in the casino's first year, rising to $418 million in its seventh year.
Neither the tribe nor its attorney responded Friday to requests for comment. Nor did opponents of the casino, who are still fighting it in court.
The agreement includes language allowing the county and tribe to reopen negotiations if impacts are found to be greater than projected, something supervisors had pushed for.
“There might be unforeseen issues that come up outside the scope of the agreement, the tribe may want to do something, or the county may recognize something that we want to address, and there's a mechanism to do that,” said Supervisor David Rabbitt, whose 2nd District includes the 254-acre Wilfred Avenue casino site just south of Home Depot.
Over and above the $9 million a year the county is guaranteed, the agreement stipulates that once the tribe meets its financial obligations to Rohnert Park and the state, it will begin paying the county more.
It would give up to $25 million a year to county parks and the county's Open Space District. The money could not be used to buy more land. It would go to create public access to parks and open space, conserve and protect environmental resources, develop organic gardens and farms serving “disadvantaged” people and enhance understanding of local Native American tribes.
Should that $25 million be paid in full, additional monies would go first to other environmental projects and then to the county's Indian Health Project and other Sonoma County tribes that do not run gambling operations.
Page 4 of 4
Asked whether the casino, which has been one of the most controversial projects ever in the region and is still bitterly resented by many, might prove to be a net win for the county, Rabbitt said: “I think that the proof's really in the pudding going forward, and we'll see.”
“My hope is that it will be seen as a positive,” he said. “My hope is that the majority of people will visit the casino in a bus, leave their money here and go home.”
http://www.petaluma360.com/article/20121020/COMMUNITY/121029996/1362/community?p=4&tc=pg
Sunday, October 7, 2012
Corruption at PA Gaming Control Board
It's helpful to be reminded of the corruption that surrounded the PA Gambling issue, as well as that of the Massachusetts legislature. Below is an article by Stop Predatory Gambling.
Corruption at Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
by Brent
Yesterday, a grand jury responded to alleged corruption at the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board by recommending a major overhaul of personnel and procedures at the Board and strengthened casino regulations. It also suggested dramatically reducing the number of secret meetings the Board holds.The former communication director for the Board testified to the grand jury that at least five people who were hired because of their political connections “ended up getting arrested or investigated for conduct that he ultimately had to try to explain to the public.”
The grand jury’s report stated that the Board “failed to thoroughly protect the public from unlawful gaming practices; failed to maximize potential new revenue to the commonwealth to support property tax relief … and otherwise engaged in activities which eroded, at a minimum, this grand jury’s confidence in the system.”
Sadly, this is just one of many examples of political corruption that occur when state governments decide to partner with the predatory gambling industry.
Read the full news story below:
Pa. grand jury calls for overhaul of casino laws
By Mark Scolforo, May 25, 2011
Associated Press
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Pennsylvania’s casino regulations should be strengthened and personnel and procedures at the Gaming Control Board should be overhauled, a grand jury said in a report issued Tuesday.
The grand jury spent two years investigating how licenses were awarded to casinos, but the probe has not led to any criminal charges and the jury did not recommend them.
But the panel’s 102-page report was highly critical of how agency lawyers, administrators and board members handled their duties. It made 21 recommendations, among them that the board needs more experienced employees, particularly among its lawyers, and should sharply limit the number of secret meetings it holds.
The board “failed to thoroughly protect the public from unlawful gaming practices; failed to maximize potential new revenue to the commonwealth to support property tax relief … and otherwise engaged in activities which eroded, at a minimum, this grand jury’s confidence in the system,” the report said.
The licensing process “became pre-occupied, fixated and singularly focused” on fairness to applicants “at the expense of adequately protecting the citizens of the commonwealth.”
Much of the grand jury findings explored the process by which the board granted licenses to casinos in Erie and the Poconos, pointing out problems in how background investigations were conducted and the close relationship that sometimes existed between the applicants, legislative leaders and the casino agency.
Former board communications director Nick Hayes testified that at least five people who were hired because of political connections “ended up getting arrested or investigated for conduct that he ultimately had to try to explain to the public.”
The board responded to the grand jury report with a statement that called its efforts an “unmitigated success.”
“After this grand jury met for more than two years, there were no arrests, no presentments, no indictments,” board chairman Greg Fajt said. “They found no criminal activity because there was, in fact, no criminal activity to be found.”
Fajt said the board provided 2.7 million pages of documents to the attorney general’s office, which ran the jury, and spent more than 4,000 man-hours to comply with the probe.
Investigative grand reports are often used by prosecutors as probable cause affidavits in filing charges, but that did not occur in this instance. Prosecutors make final decisions about charges, and attorney general’s office spokesman Nils Frederiksen declined to say whether any might result from the gaming investigation.
“As for whether your definition of an outstanding success is that nobody’s been arrested, that’s a very interesting definition of success,” Frederiksen said. “If that’s your definition of success, what’s your definition of failure?”
The grand jury recommended that an outside agency conduct annual audits and inspections of the gaming board and said clear rules are needed to prevent board members from applying for or holding slots licenses.
It found violations of nondisclosure rules, hiring restrictions and nepotism prohibitions.
“The Pennsylvania Crimes Code and related criminal statutes are inadequate to the job of combatting
public corruption,” the Pittsburgh-based panel wrote.
It said the board’s Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement should be established as an independent law enforcement agency and that all employees should have to wait four years after leaving employment before they could work for a gaming entity or any firm that represents or conducts business with a gaming entity.
The board conducted significant business behind closed doors, the jury found, a practice that undermined the public’s trust in its decisions and kept people from voicing their opinions.
The 2004 gambling law led to the establishment of 10 operating casinos that have so far generated more than $5.1 billion in fees and taxes, according to the board.
http://stoppredatorygambling.org/corruption-at-pennsylvania-gaming-control-board/
Thursday, October 4, 2012
"We're not Indians"
Perpetrating a fraud for Gambling $$$$!
From the Heroes at Stop the Casino 101 Coalition:
Casino Tribe Chairman Sarris' Cousin: "We're not Indians"
"Greg Sarris isn't telling the real story....I simply
want people to know the truth."
A relative of Greg
Sarris, chairman of the Federated Indian of Graton Rancheria (FIGR) and Native
American author who holds the Native American Studies Chair at Sonoma State
University, has confirmed that the family line Sarris claims to have Indian
blood has none at all.
For almost three decades,
Sarris has declared that "Reinette Smith", the woman he claims to be his great
grandmother, was the daughter of famous Pomo Indian medicine man Tom Smith of
Sonoma County and a Native American woman named Emily Stewart of Marin County
who had both Pomo and Coast Miwok blood. Sarris even submitted a genealogical
chart to the federal government with this information as proof that he was a
Native American of Coast Miwok and Pomo blood. The FIGR are an amalgam of both
groups of Indians.
Now 68 year old Velia
Navarro, Sarris' second cousin and herself the great granddaughter of Reinette,
has exposed Sarris' claims to Native American ancestry as false. Ms. Navarro
states categorically that Reinette, who was born Reinette Stewart and died
Reinette Morton, was "... Irish, Scottish and German...(whose) parents were from
Maine and Pennsylvania."
"I am choosing to speak out
at this time because Greg Sarris isn't telling the real story of our
great-grandmother Reinette Stewart Sarragossa Morton. I loved my
great-grandmother, and I simply want people to know the truth," Ms. Navarro says
in a sworn Declaration.
"We're not Indians," she
states firmly.
Unlike Sarris, Ms. Navarro
knew Reinette, who died in 1962 when Ms. Navarro was 18 years old.
Sarris has claimed that
"Reinette Smith" was an Indian woman born in Marin County who didn't speak a
word of English. Ms. Navarro, who routinely spoke with her "Grandma Reinette",
states that English was the only language her great grandmother wrote and
spoke.
In her four page
Declaration (below), Ms. Navarro firmly dispels the myths Sarris has created,
seemingly out of whole cloth, about Reinette, her first husband Arthur
Sarragossa and their three children. In fact, Ms. Navarro is the granddaughter
of the eldest of those three children, Juanita Sarragossa.
Sarris found the family he
believes his in about 1982. Ms. Navarro, who was born in 1944, grew up knowing
the family intimately, including the man Sarris believes to be his birth father,
her first cousin Emilio Hilario, Jr., the son of Evelyn, the youngest of the
three Sarragossa children.
It appears that Sarris knew
the truth about the family, but ignored it. In the early 1990's, Sarris
introduced Ms. Navarro to Indians from the Sonoma and Marin area. She relates,
"He told me that these people are probably your cousins; I responded to him that
they're not my cousins and we're not Indians. This made everyone in the room
very uncomfortable."
Ms. Navarro also
contradicts the majority of the statements made about her family in a 2005
YouTube video of a Sarris lecture ironically entitled "Tracing His Family History: An Evening
with Greg Sarris".
A transcript of the portion
of the YouTube video pertaining to Reinette's family is available upon request.
Ms. Navarro's oral
tradition of her family history supports the 2010 research done by Stop the
Casino 101 Coalition in every respect. That research is available on our web site.
IN RE
MATTER OF THE ANCESTRY )
DECLARATION OF
OF THE
HILARIO / SARRAGOSSA/ ) VELIA NAVARRO
STEWART
FAMILY )
)
___________________________)
I, Velia Navarro, declare as
follows:
1. I
am 68 years of age. I was born in Los Angeles in 1944, and I have lived in the
Los Angeles area my entire life. My mother was Marguerite Martinez, who was the
daughter of Juanita Sarragossa Martinez, who was herself the daughter of
Reinette Sarragossa.
2. As
a child and a teenager, I recall fondly my great-grandmother Reinette. When I
knew her she was married to her second husband, Roy Morton. She died in 1962,
when I was 18 years old, and was buried at Holy Sepulcher Cemetery in Orange. I
knew Reinette well when I was growing up. I would frequently visit her at her
small house on Canyon Acres Drive in Laguna Beach, next door to the home of her
daughter Evelyn (my great-aunt) and her husband Emilio Hilario. I remember
having long conversations with "grandma Reinette." We always spoke in English,
which as far as I am aware is the only language she spoke.
3. My
great-grandmother Reinette had three children with her first husband, Arthur
Sarragossa. Arthur died long before I was born, I believe around 1926, so I
never knew him. The three children were, in order from oldest to youngest,
Juanita, Albert and Evelyn. I knew all three of them growing up, because the
extended family would get together frequently for holidays. I grew up in Los
Angeles with my mother Marguerite.. Marguerite was Juanita's daughter. Albert
and his wife Dora also lived Los Angeles, and Evelyn and her family lived in
Laguna Beach, next door to my great-grandmother Reinette.
4.
When I knew her, my great-grandmother Reinette was a short, heavy-set woman,
standing about five feet tall. She liked to spend much time cooking. I remember
that she was always well-dressed, and that she always wore a nice hat when she
went outdoors. Although I never met him, I know that my great-grandfather Arthur
Sarragossa had very fair skin and blue eyes. I know this both from family photos
and because my grandmother Juanita, who was Arthur's daughter, told me. I also
understand, from my grandmother Juanita, that Arthur was a cigar maker and
originally from Tampa, Florida, and that his father was from Spain and his
mother was French, although whether she herself was born in France I don't
know.
5. As
I mentioned, Reinette's three children with her husband Arther were Juanita,
Albert and Evelyn. I recall clearly that my grandmother Juanita had red hair and
blue eyes. Albert, had dark skin, brown eyes and black hair. Evelyn had almond
colored skin, medium brown hair and brown eyes, and I recall her as being
slender.
6.
Notwithstanding their vastly different appearances, I never heard any hint in
the family that Juanita, Albert and Evelyn were anything other than full
siblings and the children of both Reinette and Arthur. The three had similar
facial features even though their skin color was different.
7. I
do not recall ever discussing my great-grandmother Reinette's parents or
ancestry with her. I do recall my grandmother Juanita telling me that Reinette's
ancestry was Irish, Scottish and German, and that Reinette's parents were from
Maine and Pennsylvania. I do remember once, as a young person, wondering whether
the family had some black ancestry, based on my great-uncle Albert's appearing
to be mulatto.. That got me in trouble, so I never asked about it again. I do
know that, prior to Greg Sarris' arrival on the scene, nobody in the family ever
suggested that we had any Indian ancestry whatsoever.
8. I
know that Reinette lived in the Los Angeles area when she was married to Arthur
Sarragossa. I also know that she lived in San Francisco for a period in the
1920s and 1930s, which I believe was after Arthur died, and later moved back to
Southern California. One story my mother Marguerite and my grandmother Juanita
liked to tell was from the San Francisco period. They were living in a
particularly hilly neighborhood of San Francisco, and Reinette's mother Emily
Stewart was living with the family. My mother and grandmother told me that Emily
was even shorter than Reinette, who as I mentioned only stood about five feet
tall. Reinette would have Marguerite, who was a young girl at the time, about
three or four years old, accompany her great-grandmother on walks, and Reinette
would warn Marguerite not to take Emily running down the hills.
9. I
recall that Greg Sarris found the family at some point after Emilio Jr. had died
young of coronary problems, but while Emilio Sr. was still alive. Emilio Sr.
accepted Sarris into the family on the belief that he was Emilio Jr.'s son, so I
have regarded Sarris as my third cousin since then. I do know that Sarris has
long been focused on Indians. I recall one incident when Sarris was teaching at
UCLA and living in the Hollywood Hills. This would have been in the 1990s.
Sarris asked me to come over and cook dinner because he was having company. He
introduced me to his guests, who were Indians from the Sonoma and Marin area.
Sarris told me that these people are your cousins; I responded to him that
they're not my cousins and we're not Indians. This made everyone in the room
very uncomfortable.
10. I
have watched the Youtube video of Greg Sarris explaining his purported ancestry,
and also read a partial transcript of that video, attached. To say that Sarris
is taking great liberties with our family story is an understatement.
a. Sarris' claims about
Reinette's supposed parents and grandparents are not anything that I have ever
heard before. These claims were certainly not part of the family oral tradition
when I was growing up.
b. I never heard my grandmother
Juanita, my great-uncle Albert or my great-aunt Evelyn, or anyone else, talk
about attending the "Sherman Indian School" or running away and riding the rails
to East L.A. If such colorful things had actually happened, I'm sure they would
have talked about them.
c. My understanding is that
Juanita, Albert and Evelyn were all born in the Los Angeles area, contrary to
Sarris' inference that they were from the North Bay.
d. "Uncle Millie," as Emilio
Hilario, Sr. was known to me, was a very masculine man and I simply cannot
imagine him carrying around a woman's pink wallet, nor did I ever see him do so,
after his wife Evelyn died.
e. This is a minor point, but I
do have to comment on Sarris' assertion Evelyn "was all over" Emilio Sr.
Actually, the story I heard from my mother about Emilio Hilario's courtship of
Evelyn is that he would come over to the house to give her a ride in his car,
and Marguerite, then a girl of about eight years old, would be sent to go riding
with them as a chaperone.
f. I never heard anyone address
Emilio Jr. as "chief," nor did I ever hear of anyone doing so. Emilio Jr. didn't
look anything like an Indian, so there would be no reason for anyone to do so.
Also, I recall hearing from my great-aunt Evelyn and my grandmother Juanita that
many white girls in Laguna Beach were chasing after Emilio Jr., and that worried
them because they were concerned that a young man of color could get into
trouble dating white girls. I knew Emilio Jr. well. When I was a young girl, he
would give me rides on his shoulders. I thought he was very handsome.
g. Arthur Sarragossa was not
"Mexican and Indian." As I stated above, in the family tradition he was born in
Florida, his father was Spanish and his mother was French.
11. I
understand that Linda Trujillo was quoted in an article in the Santa Rosa Press
Democrat published February 18, 2010. Trujillo is identified as working as a
receptionist in the Graton Rancheria tribal offices in Rohnert Park. In the
article Trujillo identifies herself as a granddaughter of Juanita Sarragossa.
That is true, because Linda Trujillo is my younger half-sister. The article goes
on to quote Trujillo as saying she "met" Juanita's mother, "'Nettie Smith,' an
Indian who 'didn't speak one word of English.'" That last statement is incorrect
in five different particulars. First, Reinette Sarragossa died in March 1962,
several months before Linda was born in July 1962, so the two never met. Second,
as I described above, English is the only language I ever heard Reinette speak.
Third, I never heard anyone call her "Nettie." Fourth, her last name was not
Smith. Her maiden name was Stewart, and her married names were Sarragossa and
Morton. Fifth, she wasn't an Indian.
12. I
am choosing to speak out at this time because Greg Sarris isn't telling the real
story of our great-grandmother Reinette Stewart Sarragossa Morton. I loved my
great-grandmother, and I simply want people to know the truth.
I
declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: September 15,
2012 ______________________________
Velia Navarro
(This is the text-only version of
Ms. Navarro's Declaration for use in this email only. Please see the PDF version
available at www.stopthecasino101.com for the bona fide signed
copy of this Declaration)
|
Back In Federal Court Soon!
A companion suit to the
litigation currently in State court will be filed in the VERY near
future in the federal court. This lawsuit will challenge the decision of the BIA
to take the casino site into trust.
So stay tuned, and
give to our legal fund! Donate any
amount you can using the button below to donate through safe, secure
PayPal.
of $50 or more and get a free kitchen magnet featuring Molly Eckler's beautiful Tiger Salamander painting
featured on our Facebook page
while supplies last. It's small, but pretty! (You must provide a mailing
address.)
Original artwork by Molly Eckler
http://myemail.constantcontact.com/Graton-Chairman-Sarris--Cousin---We-re-Not-Indians-.html?soid=1102324248697&aid=81nCPiOq8Rs
Friday, September 14, 2012
GAMBLING ADDICTION & CRIME
From our friends at Stop the Casino 101 :
GAMBLING ADDICTION & CRIME: Casinos want you to think there's no relationship between increased opportunities to gamble (i.e.., a casino in you town), gambling addiction and crime. Oh, yeah? Read these stories from the past month alone, of addicted gamblers who embezzled funds to pay for their gambling habits:
INDIANA: 8/24/12 Former Church Point Housing Authority head sentenced to home confinement for embezzlement
http://tinyurl.com/9y4r2lp
...
INDIANA: 8/24/12 Former Church Point Housing Authority head sentenced to home confinement for embezzlement
http://tinyurl.com/9y4r2lp
...
OHIO: 9/6/12 EX-GESU (CATHOLIC CHURCH) WORKER ADMITS EMBEZZLEMENT http://tinyurl.com/9glp8xa
WISCONSIN: 9/6/12 Embezzlement Charges for Youth Baseball Treasurer
http://www.nbc26.com/news/ local/168868466.html
MICHIGAN: 8/23/12 Livingston County man blames gambling addiction for $300K embezzlement http://tinyurl.com/9x7aea7
FL: 8/22/12 Former Miami Cop Convicted of Fraud http://tinyurl.com/8wsyjbm
NE: 9/12/12 NE: Omaha senator accused of gambling away campaign donations http://tinyurl.com/94nfjro
The list goes on and on.....
WISCONSIN: 9/6/12 Embezzlement Charges for Youth Baseball Treasurer
http://www.nbc26.com/news/
MICHIGAN: 8/23/12 Livingston County man blames gambling addiction for $300K embezzlement http://tinyurl.com/9x7aea7
FL: 8/22/12 Former Miami Cop Convicted of Fraud http://tinyurl.com/8wsyjbm
NE: 9/12/12 NE: Omaha senator accused of gambling away campaign donations http://tinyurl.com/94nfjro
The list goes on and on.....
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Michigan AG Sues to Block Tribal Slot Barn
From our friends at Stop the Casino 101 :
Michigan attorney general sues over Lansing casino: Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette is attempting to block plans for a $245 million American Indian casino in downtown Lansing.
The Lansing State Journal reports the lawsuit filed Friday in federal court seeks to stop the Kewadin Lansing project.
The six-count lawsuit, filed Friday in federal court, alleges the Sault tribe is violating federal law by proceeding with the casino. Schuette also contends it also violates the gaming compact the Sault tribe signed with the state.
http://
Schuette sues to stop Lansing casino proposal
Sault tribe, Bernero say project will continue
Sep 10, 2012
An artist's rendering of a proposed casino project in downtown Lansing. The project would be called Kewadin Lansing. The casino is expected to bring an estimated 2,200 jobs to Lansing, 700 of them in construction. [Overstated projections!]
Written by Lindsay VanHulle
LANSING — An Upper Peninsula American Indian tribe at the center of a legal challenge from Michigan’s top prosecutor plans to continue working on a proposed tribal casino in downtown Lansing despite efforts to stop it.
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette is suing the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians to halt the Kewadin Lansing casino, the $245 million project that would be built adjacent to the Lansing Center on Michigan Avenue.
The six-count lawsuit, filed Friday in federal court, alleges the Sault tribe is violating federal law by proceeding with the casino. Schuette also contends it also violates the gaming compact the Sault tribe signed with the state.
The suit names the tribe, new tribal Chairman Aaron Payment and board members as defendants. The city and Mayor Virg Bernero are not part of the lawsuit.
Schuette’s complaint represents the first major legal challenge to the casino proposal since it was announced in January. He and Gov. Rick Snyder sent a letter to the tribe in February stating their opposition and plans to fight it.
“Certainly, we expected all along that the principal legal challenge would come from the state,” tribal attorney John Wernet said. “We all along fully expected a legal challenge — that was in fact a specific part of our planning — and we have all the confidence in the world that we will successfully defend the project.”
Tribal leaders plan to close on the sale of city property and apply to the U.S. Department of the Interior to hold the land in trust for gaming by Nov. 1. Federal approval is required before any casino can be built. Two parcels ultimately would be sold, totaling $1.24 million.
The 125,000-square-foot casino would add 2,200 jobs, 700 of them in construction. A portion of the electronic gaming revenue also would be used to fund a college scholarship for Lansing high school students.
Schuette’s main argument hinges on the 1988 federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, as well as a clause of the state’s 1993 gaming compact with the Sault tribe that states no land-trust application can be submitted to the Interior Department without a revenue-sharing agreement with other Michigan tribes.
“On information and belief, the Sault Tribe has not entered into a written agreement with the State’s other federally recognized Indian tribes that provides for each of the other tribes to share in the revenue that would be generated by a casino operated off its reservation by the Sault Tribe in the City of Lansing,” the complaint states.
Sault Ste. Marie is more than 250 miles from Lansing.
The regulatory act at the heart of Schuette’s complaint bans gaming on land taken into trust after 1988 with certain exceptions, including the settlement of a land claim.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Who knew?
Most 'developers' and Gambling Industry 'experts' overstate revenues, many leading to casino bankruptcies.
Maybe this is one of the consequences that make sense.
Complaint Filed With Sec on Station Casinos Investor Information
Lawsuit could prohibit casino gaming at Rohnert Park casino; Graton Economic Development Authority investors warned “invest at your own risk” Rohnert Park, CA — ( SBWIRE ) —
08/21/2012 — A complaint was filed yesterday with the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) challenging the information provided to investors in Station Casinos 10-Q filing with the SEC. The complaint asserts that the 10-Q filing, dated August 14, 2012, paints an “overly-rosy picture” of the Graton Rancheria casino project and that it “attempts to trivialize the issues raised in the (current) litigation” and “fails to provide investors with adequate information”, (28)
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Growing Casino Deal Leads to City Hall
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










