Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Stop the Casino 101 Coalition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stop the Casino 101 Coalition. Show all posts

Friday, May 10, 2013

History Repeats Itself



DID YOU KNOW... That gambling was banned in the 20th Century because of the political corruption it had created?
DID YOU KNOW...  That  gambling was banned in the 20th Century because of the political corruption it had created?

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

TEN THINGS EVERY BUSINESSMAN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CASINOS

TEN THINGS EVERY BUSINESSMAN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CASINOS: CASINOS CREATE CRIME -In Sacramento, DUI's on the approach roads to the Thunder Valley casino were up 600% in the first year of operation (CHP). According to CityRating.com, crime statistics in Lincoln, CA, home of Thunder Valley casino show an overall upward trend in crime based on data from 11 years, with violent crime increasing and property crime increasing. The crime rate in Lincoln for 2013 is expected to be higher than in 2010. In Atlantic City, crime increased 258% after the casinos opened. (National Institute of Justice).
TEN THINGS EVERY BUSINESSMAN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CASINOS:  CASINOS CREATE CRIME -In Sacramento, DUI's on the approach roads to the Thunder Valley casino were up 600% in the first year of operation (CHP).  According to CityRating.com, crime statistics in Lincoln, CA, home of Thunder Valley casino show an overall upward trend in crime based on data from 11 years, with violent crime increasing and property crime increasing. The crime rate in Lincoln for 2013 is expected to be higher than in 2010.  In Atlantic City, crime increased 258% after the casinos opened. (National Institute of Justice).

Friday, May 3, 2013

Stop the Casino 101 Coalition




Graton Rancheria Chairman Greg Sarris is not a Native American: Sarris claims that his ancestor Reinette Stewart was an Indian woman who barely spoke a word of English, while testimony from his cousin Ms. Navarro (who routinely spoke with “Grandma Reinette”) states that English was the only language her great grandmother wrote or spoke. http://www.stopthecasino101.com/id147.html

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Atlantic City: The Poster Child for Predatory Gambling


THE CASINO & HOMELESSNESS: Amherst Professor Dr. Robert Goodman reported that “"...in Atlantic City, homelessness increased after the introduction of casinos, while clothing stores and eating and drinking establishments declined. Only a few (new) retail stores opened in the off-Boardwalk and downtown areas."
THE CASINO & HOMELESSNESS: Amherst Professor Dr. Robert Goodman reported that “"...in Atlantic City, homelessness increased after the introduction of casinos, while clothing stores and eating and drinking establishments declined. Only a few (new) retail stores opened in the off-Boardwalk and downtown areas."
 
 

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Religious position


DID YOU KNOW…Every one of the world’s major religions - Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism and Christianity - speaks against gambling: . Thousands of years of wisdom, but will we listen?

"I visited a city with a tribal casino.....

Stop the Casino 101 Coalition added a new photo.



Thursday, February 21, 2013

Social Justice-Impact on the Poor


The families living in low-income housing near the Graton Rancheria casino will bear the brunt of the traffic, noise, and pollution problems that will happen because of the casino. Let’s not add another burden to the lives of those in need – stop the Graton Rancheria Casino! http://www.stopthecasino101.com/id72.html
 
Social Justice-Impact on the Poor
Social Justice-Impact on the Poor

child.jpg
Creating a Ghetto on Rohnert Park's West Side: What the casino will do to Rohnert Park's low-income families and children.
West Side Story.....

Rohnert Park's poor families will suffer the greatest impact from the casino proposed by the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria. Rohnert Park's low-income housing is located primarily on the west side of Highway 101, and most of that housing is less than 1/4 mile from the casino site. Five low-income developments now exist near the casino site west of 101 in Rohnert Park, and more low- to very low-income housing is planned for the West Side in the next ten years, all of it less than 1/4 mile from the casino.

On the east side of the freeway, Rohnert Park's more affluent neighborhoods are graced with thirteen beautiful parks, many with swimming pools and tennis courts. But on the west side of the freeway, it's a different story. There are no parks, no pools, and no tennis courts for the city's thousands of low-income residents, and now Rohnert Park's low- income families will have to bear the brunt of the mega-casino's impacts on traffic, and noise and air pollution, as well as the increase in crime and prostitution the casino will surely bring.

But that's not all:


Gambling Addiction and Low-Income and Minorities: According to a recent study by the University of Buffalo Research Institute on Addiction, "...individuals who live within ten miles of a casino or are in a disadvantaged neighborhood are more likely to experience problem gambling...." - a double whammy for the residents on Rohnert Park's West Side. Families in Rancho Verde Mobile Home Park, one of several low-income housing developments on Rohnert Park's West Side, would have the casino literally in their back yards, and the Park's children will be exposed to the negative impacts from the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria's mega-casino on a daily basis.

University of Buffalo study (PDF)-Click Here
webassets/_Mom_Asthma.jpg

Asthma and the Casino: Did you know that Rohnert Park has the highest rate of asthma, especially in children, in Sonoma County? Asthma disproportionately impacts low-income communities and communities of color. Casino traffic will dump over 4 tons of NOx into the air every single year, as well as soot and other pollutants. Asthma affects people from all walks of life, but, low-income and minority populations have much higher fatality rates, hospital admmissions, and emergency rooms visits due to asthma.

http://www.stopthecasino101.com/id72.html

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Water Rights





Did you know that your rights to the natural water reserves in the area are in jeopardy due to the supporters behind the Casino project? Unless we fight this casino, you might find yourself in court with your lawyer fighting for your water ...against the tribe, and we may have to deal with a future of mandatory conservation laws. For more information please click on the link.
 

Not even Native American....






Greg Sarris is not a Native American: his cousin, Ms. Navarro has written a four-page declaration regarding her ancestry and family ethnicity. We’ve posted the testimony on our website so you can see the facts for yourself. Share this post and the follow link with your friends so they too will know the truth about Greg Sarris. Story: http://www.stopthecasino101.com/id147.html

Monday, October 29, 2012

The biggest bingo parlor in history!





From: Stop the Casino 101 Coalition
The biggest bingo parlor in history!

The Biggest, Most Expensive Bingo Parlor in U.S. History!
Compact lawsuit moves forward after first hearing!

 
Let me make one thing perfectly clear: our first lawsuit against Governor Brown's illegal gambling compact is going forward full-steam ahead.

Our lawsuit passed its first milestone with its first hearing on October 12, and we're moving forward with our Complaint intact!

We are challenging the validity of the Graton Rancheria compact, specifically, that under California law, the state legislature MUST cede sovereignty over the land to the federal government.

Until then, it isn't Indian land, and is still governed by State law, and state law does not allow casino-style gambling except on Indian land. Get it?

No Compact means no casino-style gambling.

When we win this lawsuit, Station Casinos and Graton Rancheria will be left with the biggest, most expensive bingo parlor in U.S. history!


But it all takes money, honey! So give right now, and be as generous as you can. If you really want to stop the casino, you have to be willing to cough up come cash.



County's "Wimpy" Deal with the Casino
WImpy by fourpanelhero on Deviantart.com

The County's deal with Graton Rancheria reminds me of Wimpy who would say to Popeye, "I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today".
The fatal flaw in any agreement for payments from Graton Rancheria is that they don't have to pay if they don't make enough money, and there is no independent auditing mechanism to check the figures.
As was made clear in the hearings in Sacramento in May, Graton doesn't have to allow anyone on its property to audit the books, state officials included.
And "wimpy" certainly describes the County's casino policy. Had the County fought vigorously and asked for Senator Feinstein's help at any point along the way, as Contra Costa County did in its battle against the San Pablo casino, it could have stopped the casino dead.
Fortunately, Stop the Casino 101 Coalition has stepped in to intervene when the County would not.
Help us do what the county lacked the guts to do! We'll fight in court for you!


http://www.stopthecasino101.com/

Saturday, October 20, 2012

The Community Voted NO!


From: Stop the Casino 101 Coalition:






webassets/LagunaDeSRookingeEastFromStonyPointRoad_NCRWCB.jpg

AFTER????
CasinoArchitectDrawingGIF.gif
This is only a portion of the entire casino-Click Pic for More

Tribal casino to pay at least $9 million a year to Sonoma County

Graton Rancheria could pay up to $38 million more in deal to offset Rohnert Park casino impacts


By JEREMY HAY
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
10/20/2012
Published: Saturday, October 20, 2012

The tribe building a casino in Rohnert Park has agreed to pay at least $9 million annually to Sonoma County to offset the impacts of the project, plus up to $38 million more a year if its revenues hit projections.

Facts


TRIBAL PAYMENTS TO SONOMA COUNTY

Under an agreement that Sonoma County supervisors are to take up on Tuesday, the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria would make a series of payments to the county, including:

ANNUAL PAYMENTS
$3.1 million for law, justice, public safety and tribal relations.
$2 million to the Sonoma
County Transportation Authority to complete work on the Marin-Sonoma Narrows project on Highway 101. After the 10th year, or following completion of that project, the tribe would pay $2 million annually to fund projects on 101 between Highway 12 and the Sonoma- Marin County line or other arterial roads serving casino.
$1.79 million to be paid as development and mitigation fee programs. The payment is equivalent to what a commercial developer would pay in order to obtain a permit.
$1 million to fire districts.
$700,000 to be paid in lieu of county transient occupancy tax once a planned hotel opens.
$600,000 for education, prevention and treatment programs to address gambling addiction and problems associated with substance abuse, mental illness, elder abuse, domestic violence and child abuse and neglect.
$500,000 to mitigate the impacts on local roads within a two-mile radius of the casino.
$416,918 to mitigate crime impacts. Santa Rosa will receive $286,923; Petaluma, $102,591; Sebastopol, $14,596; Cotati, $12,808.
$275,000 for a water conservation program.

ONE-TIME PAYMENTS
The tribe's proposed one-time payments to the county include:
$1.7 million to hire and train four new sheriff's deputies and purchase two new sheriff's vehicles.
$1.5 million for fire and emergency services.
$1.5 million for measures to offset the project's groundwater use.
$370,000 for traffic improvements near the casino.
$60,000 for "tribal relations."

The payments from the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, some of which would start this year, are nearly four times what the county previously estimated it would get.

And they are separate from those laid out in a 2003 agreement between the tribe and Rohnert Park, under which the tribe is to pay the city about $200 million over 20 years.

“Without a doubt, I think it's the best agreement that's ever happened between a tribe and a local government,” said Shirlee Zane, chairwoman of the county Board of Supervisors. She lauded the tribe for its participation.

“I think they've set a good role model for other tribal agreements in the future,” she said. “The tribe has been continually trying to put their best foot forward in terms of negotiating and really giving back to the community.”

The county in 2008 concluded that although it opposed the casino, it could not stop it, and reached a deal with the tribe to negotiate payments to address its impacts. Those negotiations led to the agreement announced Friday.

The casino, with a maximum of 3,000 slot machines, is projected to open next year. The tribe secured $850 million in financing in August.

Of the money the county would get, Santa Rosa, Petaluma, Sebastopol and Cotati would share $416,000 a year for law enforcement, and county fire districts would split $1 million.

Page 2 of 4

Also the tribe is to make one-time payments totaling $5.1 million, mainly to address costs associated with public safety, traffic improvements and measures aimed at addressing the casino's anticipated impact on groundwater supplies.

An initial payment of $3.52 million is expected to come in January to cover public safety costs, including the hiring of four new sheriff's deputies.

The agreement extends for 20 years, the term of the gambling compact between the state and Graton Rancheria that allows the tribe to operate a Las Vegas-style casino. That compact required the tribe to sign agreements with the county and Rohnert Park before opening the casino.

Work on the project started in June and its steel framework began rising on 66 acres last week.

The board is to vote on the agreement Tuesday. Zane wouldn't predict the outcome of that vote, but she said the agreement, reached after 3½ months of negotiations, achieved everything the county wanted and more.

“This agreement has met, I believe, every single concern that we've put forward in terms of mitigation,” she said.

“In addition to that, there are community benefit dollars that will come back to the county for mutual interests,” she said, referring to money that the tribe would give the county, primarily for open space projects, if it has money left over after its payments to the state, county and Rohnert Park.

In practice, the tribe is to pay, for the first seven years of operation, 15 percent of its net earnings from gambling to the state into a Graton Mitigation Fund. After seven years, that drops to 12 percent. The state then distributes that fund to Rohnert Park and the county.

Page 3 of 4

In April, the state and tribe projected those earnings, known as net win, as $350 million in the casino's first year, rising to $418 million in its seventh year.

Neither the tribe nor its attorney responded Friday to requests for comment. Nor did opponents of the casino, who are still fighting it in court.

The agreement includes language allowing the county and tribe to reopen negotiations if impacts are found to be greater than projected, something supervisors had pushed for.

“There might be unforeseen issues that come up outside the scope of the agreement, the tribe may want to do something, or the county may recognize something that we want to address, and there's a mechanism to do that,” said Supervisor David Rabbitt, whose 2nd District includes the 254-acre Wilfred Avenue casino site just south of Home Depot.

Over and above the $9 million a year the county is guaranteed, the agreement stipulates that once the tribe meets its financial obligations to Rohnert Park and the state, it will begin paying the county more.

It would give up to $25 million a year to county parks and the county's Open Space District. The money could not be used to buy more land. It would go to create public access to parks and open space, conserve and protect environmental resources, develop organic gardens and farms serving “disadvantaged” people and enhance understanding of local Native American tribes.

Should that $25 million be paid in full, additional monies would go first to other environmental projects and then to the county's Indian Health Project and other Sonoma County tribes that do not run gambling operations.

Page 4 of 4

Asked whether the casino, which has been one of the most controversial projects ever in the region and is still bitterly resented by many, might prove to be a net win for the county, Rabbitt said: “I think that the proof's really in the pudding going forward, and we'll see.”

“My hope is that it will be seen as a positive,” he said. “My hope is that the majority of people will visit the casino in a bus, leave their money here and go home.”



http://www.petaluma360.com/article/20121020/COMMUNITY/121029996/1362/community?p=4&tc=pg

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Corruption at PA Gaming Control Board



It's helpful to be reminded of the corruption that surrounded the PA Gambling issue, as well as that of the Massachusetts legislature. Below is an article by Stop Predatory Gambling.





Corruption at Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

by Brent

Yesterday, a grand jury responded to alleged corruption at the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board by recommending a major overhaul of personnel and procedures at the Board and strengthened casino regulations. It also suggested dramatically reducing the number of secret meetings the Board holds.

The former communication director for the Board testified to the grand jury that at least five people who were hired because of their political connections “ended up getting arrested or investigated for conduct that he ultimately had to try to explain to the public.”

The grand jury’s report stated that the Board “failed to thoroughly protect the public from unlawful gaming practices; failed to maximize potential new revenue to the commonwealth to support property tax relief … and otherwise engaged in activities which eroded, at a minimum, this grand jury’s confidence in the system.”

Sadly, this is just one of many examples of political corruption that occur when state governments decide to partner with the predatory gambling industry.

Read the full news story below:

Pa. grand jury calls for overhaul of casino laws
By Mark Scolforo, May 25, 2011
Associated Press

HARRISBURG, Pa. — Pennsylvania’s casino regulations should be strengthened and personnel and procedures at the Gaming Control Board should be overhauled, a grand jury said in a report issued Tuesday.

The grand jury spent two years investigating how licenses were awarded to casinos, but the probe has not led to any criminal charges and the jury did not recommend them.

But the panel’s 102-page report was highly critical of how agency lawyers, administrators and board members handled their duties. It made 21 recommendations, among them that the board needs more experienced employees, particularly among its lawyers, and should sharply limit the number of secret meetings it holds.

The board “failed to thoroughly protect the public from unlawful gaming practices; failed to maximize potential new revenue to the commonwealth to support property tax relief … and otherwise engaged in activities which eroded, at a minimum, this grand jury’s confidence in the system,” the report said.

The licensing process “became pre-occupied, fixated and singularly focused” on fairness to applicants “at the expense of adequately protecting the citizens of the commonwealth.”

Much of the grand jury findings explored the process by which the board granted licenses to casinos in Erie and the Poconos, pointing out problems in how background investigations were conducted and the close relationship that sometimes existed between the applicants, legislative leaders and the casino agency.

Former board communications director Nick Hayes testified that at least five people who were hired because of political connections “ended up getting arrested or investigated for conduct that he ultimately had to try to explain to the public.”

The board responded to the grand jury report with a statement that called its efforts an “unmitigated success.”

“After this grand jury met for more than two years, there were no arrests, no presentments, no indictments,” board chairman Greg Fajt said. “They found no criminal activity because there was, in fact, no criminal activity to be found.”

Fajt said the board provided 2.7 million pages of documents to the attorney general’s office, which ran the jury, and spent more than 4,000 man-hours to comply with the probe.

Investigative grand reports are often used by prosecutors as probable cause affidavits in filing charges, but that did not occur in this instance. Prosecutors make final decisions about charges, and attorney general’s office spokesman Nils Frederiksen declined to say whether any might result from the gaming investigation.

“As for whether your definition of an outstanding success is that nobody’s been arrested, that’s a very interesting definition of success,” Frederiksen said. “If that’s your definition of success, what’s your definition of failure?”

The grand jury recommended that an outside agency conduct annual audits and inspections of the gaming board and said clear rules are needed to prevent board members from applying for or holding slots licenses.

It found violations of nondisclosure rules, hiring restrictions and nepotism prohibitions.

“The Pennsylvania Crimes Code and related criminal statutes are inadequate to the job of combatting
public corruption,” the Pittsburgh-based panel wrote.

It said the board’s Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement should be established as an independent law enforcement agency and that all employees should have to wait four years after leaving employment before they could work for a gaming entity or any firm that represents or conducts business with a gaming entity.

The board conducted significant business behind closed doors, the jury found, a practice that undermined the public’s trust in its decisions and kept people from voicing their opinions.

The 2004 gambling law led to the establishment of 10 operating casinos that have so far generated more than $5.1 billion in fees and taxes, according to the board.

http://stoppredatorygambling.org/corruption-at-pennsylvania-gaming-control-board/

Thursday, October 4, 2012

"We're not Indians"


Perpetrating a fraud for Gambling $$$$!





From the Heroes at Stop the Casino 101 Coalition:

Casino Tribe Chairman Sarris' Cousin: "We're not Indians"
"Greg Sarris isn't telling the real story....I simply want people to know the truth."


A relative of Greg Sarris, chairman of the Federated Indian of Graton Rancheria (FIGR) and Native American author who holds the Native American Studies Chair at Sonoma State University, has confirmed that the family line Sarris claims to have Indian blood has none at all.


For almost three decades, Sarris has declared that "Reinette Smith", the woman he claims to be his great grandmother, was the daughter of famous Pomo Indian medicine man Tom Smith of Sonoma County and a Native American woman named Emily Stewart of Marin County who had both Pomo and Coast Miwok blood. Sarris even submitted a genealogical chart to the federal government with this information as proof that he was a Native American of Coast Miwok and Pomo blood. The FIGR are an amalgam of both groups of Indians.


Now 68 year old Velia Navarro, Sarris' second cousin and herself the great granddaughter of Reinette, has exposed Sarris' claims to Native American ancestry as false. Ms. Navarro states categorically that Reinette, who was born Reinette Stewart and died Reinette Morton, was "... Irish, Scottish and German...(whose) parents were from Maine and Pennsylvania."


"I am choosing to speak out at this time because Greg Sarris isn't telling the real story of our great-grandmother Reinette Stewart Sarragossa Morton. I loved my great-grandmother, and I simply want people to know the truth," Ms. Navarro says in a sworn Declaration.


"We're not Indians," she states firmly.


Unlike Sarris, Ms. Navarro knew Reinette, who died in 1962 when Ms. Navarro was 18 years old.


Sarris has claimed that "Reinette Smith" was an Indian woman born in Marin County who didn't speak a word of English. Ms. Navarro, who routinely spoke with her "Grandma Reinette", states that English was the only language her great grandmother wrote and spoke.


In her four page Declaration (below), Ms. Navarro firmly dispels the myths Sarris has created, seemingly out of whole cloth, about Reinette, her first husband Arthur Sarragossa and their three children. In fact, Ms. Navarro is the granddaughter of the eldest of those three children, Juanita Sarragossa.


Sarris found the family he believes his in about 1982. Ms. Navarro, who was born in 1944, grew up knowing the family intimately, including the man Sarris believes to be his birth father, her first cousin Emilio Hilario, Jr., the son of Evelyn, the youngest of the three Sarragossa children.


It appears that Sarris knew the truth about the family, but ignored it. In the early 1990's, Sarris introduced Ms. Navarro to Indians from the Sonoma and Marin area. She relates, "He told me that these people are probably your cousins; I responded to him that they're not my cousins and we're not Indians. This made everyone in the room very uncomfortable."


Ms. Navarro also contradicts the majority of the statements made about her family in a 2005 YouTube video of a Sarris lecture ironically entitled "Tracing His Family History: An Evening with Greg Sarris".



A transcript of the portion of the YouTube video pertaining to Reinette's family is available upon request.


Ms. Navarro's oral tradition of her family history supports the 2010 research done by Stop the Casino 101 Coalition in every respect. That research is available on our web site.


IN RE MATTER OF THE ANCESTRY ) DECLARATION OF
OF THE HILARIO / SARRAGOSSA/ ) VELIA NAVARRO
STEWART FAMILY )
)
___________________________)
I, Velia Navarro, declare as follows:
1. I am 68 years of age. I was born in Los Angeles in 1944, and I have lived in the Los Angeles area my entire life. My mother was Marguerite Martinez, who was the daughter of Juanita Sarragossa Martinez, who was herself the daughter of Reinette Sarragossa.
2. As a child and a teenager, I recall fondly my great-grandmother Reinette. When I knew her she was married to her second husband, Roy Morton. She died in 1962, when I was 18 years old, and was buried at Holy Sepulcher Cemetery in Orange. I knew Reinette well when I was growing up. I would frequently visit her at her small house on Canyon Acres Drive in Laguna Beach, next door to the home of her daughter Evelyn (my great-aunt) and her husband Emilio Hilario. I remember having long conversations with "grandma Reinette." We always spoke in English, which as far as I am aware is the only language she spoke.
3. My great-grandmother Reinette had three children with her first husband, Arthur Sarragossa. Arthur died long before I was born, I believe around 1926, so I never knew him. The three children were, in order from oldest to youngest, Juanita, Albert and Evelyn. I knew all three of them growing up, because the extended family would get together frequently for holidays. I grew up in Los Angeles with my mother Marguerite.. Marguerite was Juanita's daughter. Albert and his wife Dora also lived Los Angeles, and Evelyn and her family lived in Laguna Beach, next door to my great-grandmother Reinette.
4. When I knew her, my great-grandmother Reinette was a short, heavy-set woman, standing about five feet tall. She liked to spend much time cooking. I remember that she was always well-dressed, and that she always wore a nice hat when she went outdoors. Although I never met him, I know that my great-grandfather Arthur Sarragossa had very fair skin and blue eyes. I know this both from family photos and because my grandmother Juanita, who was Arthur's daughter, told me. I also understand, from my grandmother Juanita, that Arthur was a cigar maker and originally from Tampa, Florida, and that his father was from Spain and his mother was French, although whether she herself was born in France I don't know.
5. As I mentioned, Reinette's three children with her husband Arther were Juanita, Albert and Evelyn. I recall clearly that my grandmother Juanita had red hair and blue eyes. Albert, had dark skin, brown eyes and black hair. Evelyn had almond colored skin, medium brown hair and brown eyes, and I recall her as being slender.
6. Notwithstanding their vastly different appearances, I never heard any hint in the family that Juanita, Albert and Evelyn were anything other than full siblings and the children of both Reinette and Arthur. The three had similar facial features even though their skin color was different.
7. I do not recall ever discussing my great-grandmother Reinette's parents or ancestry with her. I do recall my grandmother Juanita telling me that Reinette's ancestry was Irish, Scottish and German, and that Reinette's parents were from Maine and Pennsylvania. I do remember once, as a young person, wondering whether the family had some black ancestry, based on my great-uncle Albert's appearing to be mulatto.. That got me in trouble, so I never asked about it again. I do know that, prior to Greg Sarris' arrival on the scene, nobody in the family ever suggested that we had any Indian ancestry whatsoever.
8. I know that Reinette lived in the Los Angeles area when she was married to Arthur Sarragossa. I also know that she lived in San Francisco for a period in the 1920s and 1930s, which I believe was after Arthur died, and later moved back to Southern California. One story my mother Marguerite and my grandmother Juanita liked to tell was from the San Francisco period. They were living in a particularly hilly neighborhood of San Francisco, and Reinette's mother Emily Stewart was living with the family. My mother and grandmother told me that Emily was even shorter than Reinette, who as I mentioned only stood about five feet tall. Reinette would have Marguerite, who was a young girl at the time, about three or four years old, accompany her great-grandmother on walks, and Reinette would warn Marguerite not to take Emily running down the hills.
9. I recall that Greg Sarris found the family at some point after Emilio Jr. had died young of coronary problems, but while Emilio Sr. was still alive. Emilio Sr. accepted Sarris into the family on the belief that he was Emilio Jr.'s son, so I have regarded Sarris as my third cousin since then. I do know that Sarris has long been focused on Indians. I recall one incident when Sarris was teaching at UCLA and living in the Hollywood Hills. This would have been in the 1990s. Sarris asked me to come over and cook dinner because he was having company. He introduced me to his guests, who were Indians from the Sonoma and Marin area. Sarris told me that these people are your cousins; I responded to him that they're not my cousins and we're not Indians. This made everyone in the room very uncomfortable.
10. I have watched the Youtube video of Greg Sarris explaining his purported ancestry, and also read a partial transcript of that video, attached. To say that Sarris is taking great liberties with our family story is an understatement.
a. Sarris' claims about Reinette's supposed parents and grandparents are not anything that I have ever heard before. These claims were certainly not part of the family oral tradition when I was growing up.
b. I never heard my grandmother Juanita, my great-uncle Albert or my great-aunt Evelyn, or anyone else, talk about attending the "Sherman Indian School" or running away and riding the rails to East L.A. If such colorful things had actually happened, I'm sure they would have talked about them.
c. My understanding is that Juanita, Albert and Evelyn were all born in the Los Angeles area, contrary to Sarris' inference that they were from the North Bay.
d. "Uncle Millie," as Emilio Hilario, Sr. was known to me, was a very masculine man and I simply cannot imagine him carrying around a woman's pink wallet, nor did I ever see him do so, after his wife Evelyn died.
e. This is a minor point, but I do have to comment on Sarris' assertion Evelyn "was all over" Emilio Sr. Actually, the story I heard from my mother about Emilio Hilario's courtship of Evelyn is that he would come over to the house to give her a ride in his car, and Marguerite, then a girl of about eight years old, would be sent to go riding with them as a chaperone.
f. I never heard anyone address Emilio Jr. as "chief," nor did I ever hear of anyone doing so. Emilio Jr. didn't look anything like an Indian, so there would be no reason for anyone to do so. Also, I recall hearing from my great-aunt Evelyn and my grandmother Juanita that many white girls in Laguna Beach were chasing after Emilio Jr., and that worried them because they were concerned that a young man of color could get into trouble dating white girls. I knew Emilio Jr. well. When I was a young girl, he would give me rides on his shoulders. I thought he was very handsome.
g. Arthur Sarragossa was not "Mexican and Indian." As I stated above, in the family tradition he was born in Florida, his father was Spanish and his mother was French.
11. I understand that Linda Trujillo was quoted in an article in the Santa Rosa Press Democrat published February 18, 2010. Trujillo is identified as working as a receptionist in the Graton Rancheria tribal offices in Rohnert Park. In the article Trujillo identifies herself as a granddaughter of Juanita Sarragossa. That is true, because Linda Trujillo is my younger half-sister. The article goes on to quote Trujillo as saying she "met" Juanita's mother, "'Nettie Smith,' an Indian who 'didn't speak one word of English.'" That last statement is incorrect in five different particulars. First, Reinette Sarragossa died in March 1962, several months before Linda was born in July 1962, so the two never met. Second, as I described above, English is the only language I ever heard Reinette speak. Third, I never heard anyone call her "Nettie." Fourth, her last name was not Smith. Her maiden name was Stewart, and her married names were Sarragossa and Morton. Fifth, she wasn't an Indian.
12. I am choosing to speak out at this time because Greg Sarris isn't telling the real story of our great-grandmother Reinette Stewart Sarragossa Morton. I loved my great-grandmother, and I simply want people to know the truth.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: September 15, 2012 ______________________________
Velia Navarro
(This is the text-only version of Ms. Navarro's Declaration for use in this email only. Please see the PDF version available at www.stopthecasino101.com for the bona fide signed copy of this Declaration)
END DECLARATION


Back In Federal Court Soon!

A companion suit to the litigation currently in State court will be filed in the VERY near future in the federal court. This lawsuit will challenge the decision of the BIA to take the casino site into trust.
So stay tuned, and give to our legal fund! Donate any amount you can using the button below to donate through safe, secure PayPal.
Make a Donation
of $50 or more and get a free kitchen magnet featuring Molly Eckler's beautiful Tiger Salamander painting featured on our Facebook page while supplies last. It's small, but pretty! (You must provide a mailing address.)
CA Tiger Salamander
 
Original artwork by Molly Eckler


http://myemail.constantcontact.com/Graton-Chairman-Sarris--Cousin---We-re-Not-Indians-.html?soid=1102324248697&aid=81nCPiOq8Rs




Friday, September 14, 2012

GAMBLING ADDICTION & CRIME

From our friends at Stop the Casino 101 :


GAMBLING ADDICTION & CRIME: Casinos want you to think there's no relationship between increased opportunities to gamble (i.e.., a casino in you town), gambling addiction and crime. Oh, yeah? Read these stories from the past month alone, of addicted gamblers who embezzled funds to pay for their gambling habits:

INDIANA: 8/24/12 Former Church Point Housing Authority head sentenced to home confinement for embezzlement
http://tinyurl.com/9y4r2lp

...
OHIO: 9/6/12 EX-GESU (CATHOLIC CHURCH) WORKER ADMITS EMBEZZLEMENT http://tinyurl.com/9glp8xa

WISCONSIN: 9/6/12 Embezzlement Charges for Youth Baseball Treasurer
http://www.nbc26.com/news/local/168868466.html

MICHIGAN: 8/23/12 Livingston County man blames gambling addiction for $300K embezzlement http://tinyurl.com/9x7aea7

FL: 8/22/12 Former Miami Cop Convicted of Fraud http://tinyurl.com/8wsyjbm

NE: 9/12/12 NE: Omaha senator accused of gambling away campaign donations http://tinyurl.com/94nfjro

The list goes on and on.....

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Michigan AG Sues to Block Tribal Slot Barn






From our friends at Stop the Casino 101 :

Michigan attorney general sues over Lansing casino: Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette is attempting to block plans for a $245 million American Indian casino in downtown Lansing.

The Lansing State Journal reports the lawsuit filed Friday in federal court seeks to stop the Kewadin Lansing project.

The six-count lawsuit, filed Friday in federal court, alleges the Sault tribe is violating federal law by proceeding with the casino. Schuette also contends it also violates the gaming compact the Sault tribe signed with the state.


http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/article/20120910/NEWS01/309100030/Lansing-casino-lawsuit-attorney-general-Chippewas?odyssey=tab%7Ctopnews%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE


Schuette sues to stop Lansing casino proposal
Sault tribe, Bernero say project will continue
Sep 10, 2012




An artist's rendering of a proposed casino project in downtown Lansing. The project would be called Kewadin Lansing. The casino is expected to bring an estimated 2,200 jobs to Lansing, 700 of them in construction.  [Overstated projections!]

Written by Lindsay VanHulle

LANSING — An Upper Peninsula American Indian tribe at the center of a legal challenge from Michigan’s top prosecutor plans to continue working on a proposed tribal casino in downtown Lansing despite efforts to stop it.

Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette is suing the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians to halt the Kewadin Lansing casino, the $245 million project that would be built adjacent to the Lansing Center on Michigan Avenue.

The six-count lawsuit, filed Friday in federal court, alleges the Sault tribe is violating federal law by proceeding with the casino. Schuette also contends it also violates the gaming compact the Sault tribe signed with the state.

The suit names the tribe, new tribal Chairman Aaron Payment and board members as defendants. The city and Mayor Virg Bernero are not part of the lawsuit.

Schuette’s complaint represents the first major legal challenge to the casino proposal since it was announced in January. He and Gov. Rick Snyder sent a letter to the tribe in February stating their opposition and plans to fight it.

“Certainly, we expected all along that the principal legal challenge would come from the state,” tribal attorney John Wernet said. “We all along fully expected a legal challenge — that was in fact a specific part of our planning — and we have all the confidence in the world that we will successfully defend the project.”

Tribal leaders plan to close on the sale of city property and apply to the U.S. Department of the Interior to hold the land in trust for gaming by Nov. 1. Federal approval is required before any casino can be built. Two parcels ultimately would be sold, totaling $1.24 million.

The 125,000-square-foot casino would add 2,200 jobs, 700 of them in construction. A portion of the electronic gaming revenue also would be used to fund a college scholarship for Lansing high school students.

Schuette’s main argument hinges on the 1988 federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, as well as a clause of the state’s 1993 gaming compact with the Sault tribe that states no land-trust application can be submitted to the Interior Department without a revenue-sharing agreement with other Michigan tribes.

“On information and belief, the Sault Tribe has not entered into a written agreement with the State’s other federally recognized Indian tribes that provides for each of the other tribes to share in the revenue that would be generated by a casino operated off its reservation by the Sault Tribe in the City of Lansing,” the complaint states.

Sault Ste. Marie is more than 250 miles from Lansing.

The regulatory act at the heart of Schuette’s complaint bans gaming on land taken into trust after 1988 with certain exceptions, including the settlement of a land claim.




Thursday, August 23, 2012

Who knew?



Most 'developers' and Gambling Industry 'experts' overstate revenues, many leading to casino bankruptcies.

Maybe this is one of the consequences that make sense.

Complaint Filed With Sec on Station Casinos Investor Information

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Growing Casino Deal Leads to City Hall


Please forward this to your lists
We depend on you to spread the word!


Stop the Casino 101 Coalition
The Voice of the People
Find us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter August 16, 2012
In This Issue
Compact scandal leads to RP City Hall

Sun
Tired of Being Kept in the Dark?

Tired of being kept in the dark on casino negotiations?
Email Sonoma County Board Chair Shirlee Zane and Rohnert Park Mayor Jake MacKenzie and tell them them to
LET THE SUN SHINE IN!

Demand
1. An open and transparent process in casino negotiations.
2. Regular public hearings on the casino negotiations.
3. Weekly updates on the negotiations to be posted on the county's web site and emailed to anyone who requests it.
4. Prompt, honest answers to the public's questions.
5. NO VOTE UNTIL HEARINGS HAVE BEEN HELD AND THE PUBLIC HAS BEEN FULLY INFORMED THREE MONTHS IN ADVANCE.

Please give to our legal fund!


Stop the Casino!
Make a Donation

Quick Links





Growing Casino Compact Scandal Leads To Rohnert Park City Hall
Grand Jury investigation under consideration

As questions mount in the growing Graton Rancheria gambling compact scandal, Rohnert Park Mayor Jake MacKenzie admitted in a interview on KSRO radio that the City of Rohnert Park reviewed a 2003 agreement with the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria (FIGR) "...as part of coming up to the Compact with the state."
Mr. MacKenzie went on to say that City attorneys had assured the city council that the agreement was "valid and in good standing", contradicting the City Manager Gabe Gonzalez' statements to the press last week that the City did not have a valid agreement.
Mayor MacKenzie's position contradicts a September 2005 memo from the FIGR to Rohnert Park which tells the city that the agreement, a Memorandum of Understanding, or MOU, that the agreement would have to be amended "...to reflect the realities of the new site....". Mr. MacKenzie was a member of the City Council in 2005.
It also contradicts the opinion of the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) which stated several times in official documents that the MOU did not apply to the current site, and that the FIGR would have to negotiate a new agreement.
"I'd like to know under what legal premise a contract that applies to only one place on the planet can suddenly and miraculously be expanded to apply to any place the casino developers want to build," said Pastor Chip Worthington, founder of Stop the Casino 101 Coalition (STC101). "Under that premise, Graton could have built the casino anywhere it wanted and the Rohnert Park MOU would still be in effect. This is simply not the law."
Admitting that the invalid MOU was used with the City's complicity indicates a wider scandal than previously thought. On June 6, 2011, at a meeting with Jacob Appelsmith at the current casino site, STC101 advised him that the Rohnert Park MOU did not apply to the new site. Mr. Appelsmith appears to have ignored this warning as well as the opinion of the NIGC, forwarded to him at a later date.
We're strongly considering going to the Grand Jury on this," said Mr. Worthington. "This appears to be a conspiracy between the City, the State and the FIGR to commit an act of fraud against the people of Sonoma County for the sole purpose of facilitating casino construction."
"If Governor Brown is willing to sink to this level just to get a casino built in a university town, then California is in trouble."
It is extremely important that we call the Governor's office and tell him to do his duty and enforce his Compact with Graton Rancheria and stop the illegal construction on the Rohnert Park casino.
Phone or Fax him (Best) at Phone: (916) 445-2841
Fax: (916) 558-3160 or
send an email through the Governor's web site . Choose "Attorney General" from the drop-down menu.