Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Parx. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parx. Show all posts

Sunday, August 21, 2016

N.J. couple admits leaving 3 kids in freezing car while gambling at casino in cold




Couple Left Young Kids in Car to Gamble at Pa. Casino: Police

A New Jersey couple is behind bars after police say they left three young children in a cold SUV while they hit a Pennsylvania casino.
Police were called to the Parx Casino parking lot in Bensalem Saturday for a report of three children — ages 8, 3 and 1 — inside a vehicle, said Bensalem Police. Temperatures were hovering near freezing at the time.
Court records show 39-year-old Jarrett Evan Nelson and 30-year-old Ebony Walker, both of Newark, face charges including endangering the welfare of children.
Surveillance video showed the two entered the casino at 7:33 p.m. and returned to the SUV around 9:11 p.m.  The children weren't harmed and were released to other family members.
Walker and Nelson were sent to Bucks County prison after they were unable to post bail.
Online court documents don't list attorneys for Nelson or Walker.




N.J. couple admits leaving 3 kids in freezing car while gambling at casino in cold

By Kevin Shea | For NJ.com 
on August 19, 2016


BENSALEM, Pa. — A Newark, N.J. couple was sentenced to probation Friday for leaving their three children in a car in sub-freezing temperatures while they gambled at Parx Casino in January.
Jarrett Nelson, 40, and Ebony Walker, 31, pleaded guilty to misdemeanor endangering the welfare of children and recklessly endangering another person in in Bucks County Common Pleas Court in Dyolestown [sic].
Nelson, who spent two months in prison after his arrest, was sentenced to time served and 34 months probation. Walker was sentenced to 36 months of probation before Judge Rea B. Boylan, the Bucks County District Attorney's Office said in a statement.
The children, ages 8, 3 and 18 months, were not injured during the Jan. 2 incident.
They were unattended in 31-degree weather for more than 90 minutes, the office said.
Walker told the judge she was struggling for money, had recently been robbed and was desperate for rent money, the office said. 
She and Nelson, who was unemployed, said they won more than $700 playing the slots at Parx, which they put toward their rent.
But both admitted that leaving the children alone was wrong and dangerous, although Walker said she was in constant contact with the 8-year-old via cell phone.
"It happened, and it's the worst mistake I ever made," Walker said in court, the office said. "I made the money I needed, but I got incarcerated."
"No excuse at all," Nelson said. "It will never happen again, because I love my kids so much."
The district attorney's office said New Jersey child protective officials placed the children in Walker's mother's custody following the couple's arrests.
Walker suffers from bipolar disorder. She said in court she placed herself into an intensive counseling program in New Jersey following her arrest, which she still attends.
Nelson said in court the couple hopes to marry after they recover financially and regain custody of the children.
Boylan, the judge, told the couple the cold weather was not the only danger the children faced by being alone in a casino parking lot. They could have been abducted.
Surveillance video showed the couple entering the casino at 7:33 p.m. and returning to their vehicle at 9:11 p.m.
"There's so many things that could have happened to your children, not just being cold and scared," Boylan told the couple.



Could Bethlehem lose casino cash cow?





Could Bethlehem lose casino cash cow?



 Of The Morning Call
AUGUST 20, 2016

Pennsylvania lawmakers and casino executives have been squabbling for months about whether things such as online gambling or satellite casinos could help close the state's budget deficit, but another fight winding through the state Supreme Court could have a far bigger impact on Main Streets across the state.
Mount Airy Casino is asking the court to strike down the $10 million host fee most casinos pay to the towns where they are located, arguing it violates the state constitution by putting a much heavier tax burden on lower performing casinos.
If Mount Airy wins its case, it could eliminate a large chunk of the annual fee casino towns across the state use to pay for a wide variety of items.

"Our host fee is equivalent to the salaries of 100 police officers," said Bethlehem Mayor Robert Donchez. "That's a significant amount of money. That host fee is extremely important to our budget."
Sands Casino in Bethlehem is not contesting the fee it pays Bethlehem, but any decision issued by the Supreme Court likely would dictate how every casino must pay — or not pay.
A Mount Airy win would be a devastating blow to the budgets of most casino towns that collect the fee, but there's no need for those municipal leaders to panic, just yet. State legislators suggest they'd move quickly to alter the law to replace the fee — or at least they'd try. State legislators have spent much of the past year debating how to expand gambling to raise more money to balance the budget, but have not been able to reach consensus.
"I don't know exactly how we'd go about it, but given that this fee has been established for a decade, we're not just going to let this money be stripped from municipalities that rely on it," said Sen. Pat Browne, who chairs the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee.
Unequal tax
The case is being defended by attorneys from the state attorney general's office, which argues the tax scheme does not violate state law.
The case started in April 2015, when Mount Airy filed a legal challenge that argues the "local share tax" violates the uniformity clause in the state constitution, which requires that "all taxes shall be uniform, upon the same class of subjects." As a constitutional challenge to the gaming law, the matter was eligible to bypass lower courts and be filed directly to state Supreme Court.
The 2004 state gaming law imposes a 2 percent fee on gross slot machine revenues, to be paid to the municipalities where the casinos were built. However, the law also states that a minimum of $10 million must be paid. Therefore, the 2 percent would only really come into play once gross slot machine revenues for a casino went above $500 million.
Because that's never happened, the nine casinos affected by the law — SugarHouse Casino in Philadelphia and two resort casinos aren't subject to the minimum requirement — simply pay $10 million a year.

That creates an unequal tax that has some casinos paying a much bigger portion of their revenues to their host community. So, while the $10 million paid by Pennsylvania's most lucrative casino, Parx in Bensalem, was just 2.8 percent of the casino's 2014 gross slot machine revenue, the $10 million Mount Airy paid was more than 7 percent of its $140 million in revenue for 2014.
Each day, the Department of Revenue siphons 2 percent of all slot machine revenues from each casino and distributes it quarterly to the host community. At the end of the year, if that casino hasn't generated $10 million in fees then state regulators instruct the casino to make the payment needed to reach the $10 million minimum.
That "true-up" payment is what Mount Airy is contesting. For Mount Airy, the payment was $7.2 million for 2015, but even successful casinos have to write big checks. Sands, for example, had to pay $4 million to reach its minimum for last year.
In Sands' case, $3.2 million of that true-up payment went into Bethlehem's general fund and about $800,000 went to Allentown, under a deal struck between the cities before the gaming license was given to Bethlehem. It's a similar story in casino towns across the state, where casinos — depending on their revenue — pay end-of-year true-up fees ranging from Parx's $2.4 million to the $7.7 million paid by Presque Isle Casino, Erie.
"All we're asking for is uniformity and fairness, and that $10 million rate is neither," said Michael Sklar, the Atlantic City attorney who is co-counsel for the Mount Airy suit. "We think if the court strikes down the $10 million minimum, the 2 percent tax passes constitutional muster."
In addition to asking that $10 million minimum be struck down, Mount Airy is asking the court to award damages. While it doesn't specify how much, it has paid $57.4 million in true-up fees since it opened in 2007, second only to Presque Isle's $61.8 million.
Not a surprise
Part of Mount Airy's argument is not only that lesser performing casinos are unfairly burdened, but also that not every casino must pay the $10 million minimum. SugarHouse Casino in Philadelphia pays a straight 4 percent of its gross revenue. That consists of the same 2 percent all state casinos pay to their host county, plus another 2 percent that represents the local share, but without the $10 million minimum Mount Airy and other casinos pay.
Christopher Craig, a Pennsylvania Treasury attorney and former legislative counsel who wrote much of the gaming law, wouldn't predict how the court will rule, but he explained why the law was written the way it was.
The proposed Philadelphia County casinos in the law weren't given a $10 million minimum because the city was expected to be the only municipality that would have two casinos, therefore there was no need for a minimum. As it turned out, SugarHouse has been the only casino built so far, while the other gambling license has been delayed for years.
More to the point, Craig said the host fee is just that — a fee that every casino applicant was aware of when they applied for a gambling license in 2004. Though the Mount Airy suit repeatedly refers to it as a "Local Share Tax," it was actually called a "Local Share Assessment" in the law, Craig noted.
"A cost was identified for the impact gambling would have on a municipality and that cost was $10 million," Craig said. "In exchange for engaging in an activity that would otherwise be illegal, the licensee agreed to pay a minimum of $10 million."
That's how Sands Casino CEO Mark Juliano interprets it.
"We knew exactly what we were getting into when we applied for the license," Juliano said. "We're not trying to get out of it. We don't intend to join in the suit."
But two other casinos also have raised similar challenges. Harrah's Casino in Chester filed a similar suit last year and Rivers Casino in Pittsburgh filed a nearly identical suit in July. Harrah's suit was stayed while the Mount Airy case runs its course, and Rivers withdrew its case just a few weeks after filing it, presumably to wait for the Mount Airy decision.
Both sides have spent months filing preliminary objections and briefs, and oral arguments have already been made. There's no time limit on how long the court has to deliberate on the matter, so a decision could come any day, or it could be months away.
Analysts say the court could do everything from deny the challenge, to strike down the $10 million minimum requirement — or even strike down the entire local share fee altogether. It also will have to decide whether Mount Airy and the other casinos deserve a refund of any of the the more than $320 million in true-up payments they've made the past decade.
"This is one everyone is watching closely," Browne said. "There's a lot at stake."

AT ISSUE
• Mount Airy Casino is asking the Supreme Court to strike down the $10 million host fee most casinos pay to the towns where they are located.
• All casinos pay 2 percent of all slot machine revenues to the state Department of Revenue to be distributed to host communities. However, if that amount is less than $10 million annually, casinos are required to kick in the difference.
• That difference, a "true-up" payment, is what Mount Airy is contesting. In 2015, Mount Airy's true-up payment was $7.2 million.




Thursday, July 21, 2016

Rivers Casino challenge to slots tax highlights big checks Pa. casinos have been writing




Slot machine tax challenged by Rivers Casino
Every day, 2 percent of the cash earned by every slot machine at Rivers Casino goes to the city of Pittsburgh. In 2015, that amounted to $5.5 million. But it wasn’t nearly enough. At the end of the year, the North Shore casino cut a check for another $4.5 million to hand over to the city — representing the difference between what its slot machines produced and the minimum $10 million that Pittsburgh is entitled to annually under state gambling law.

Rivers Casino challenge to slots tax highlights big checks Pa. casinos have been writing




Every day, 2 percent of the cash earned by every slot machine at Rivers Casino goes to the city of Pittsburgh. In 2015, that amounted to $5.5 million. But it wasn’t nearly enough.
At the end of the year, the North Shore casino cut a check for another $4.5 million to hand over to the city — representing the difference between what its slot machines produced and the minimum $10 million that Pittsburgh is entitled to annually under state gambling law.
Rivers Casino is no exception.
Last year, eight other casinos in the state ponied up anywhere from $2.4 million to $7.6 million in “true-up” payments to cover the difference between what their slot machines produced for local municipalities and the minimum $10 million they are required to pay their communities.
The municipal portion of the local share tax, enacted when slot machine gambling was legalized in Pennsylvania in 2004, is now the subject of legal challenges by Rivers and two other casinos — Mount Airy and Harrah’s Philadelphia.
Stakes have become high in the legal tussle — so high that Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto canceled an appearance at Rivers Casino Wednesday for a Northside Chamber of Commerce event.
He felt “it is not appropriate to appear at the casino while it is making the city the subject of a lawsuit putting taxpayer funds in jeopardy,” spokesman Tim McNulty said.
Under the system being challenged, all casinos in the state are required to pay the municipal portion except those in Philadelphia and the resort casinos in Nemacolin and Valley Forge. The affected venues pay 2 percent of their gross terminal revenue if it exceeds $500 million or $10 million if it is less than that.
In its lawsuit filed last month, Holdings Acquisition Co., the Rivers Casino owner, claimed the provision “imposes unequal rates of taxation on slot machine licensees” and violates uniformity and equal protection clauses in the state and U.S. constitutions.
The law lacks uniformity, it maintained, because it ordains two tax rates on the same class of taxpayers depending on whether gross terminal revenues are above or below $500 million. That difference in treatment is “arbitrary and not rationally related to any legitimate government purpose,” Holdings argued.
Compounding the matter, at least in the eyes of Holdings, is that casinos in the city of Philadelphia pay 4 percent of their gross terminal revenue as the local share but are not subject to the $10 million minimum. Resort casinos pay 2 percent and aren’t subject to the $10 million minimum.
In the 10 years the state has been collecting the municipal share, no casino has ever exceeded the $500 million figure, meaning all have been required to write checks every year to hit the $10 million level. That’s despite the fact many would be paying much less based solely on revenues.
The way the system works is that the state collects 2 percent a day from casino slot machines and earmarks it for the municipal share. At the end of the year, the state calculates how much has been collected and how much each casino owes as a “true-up” payment to reach the $10 million.
Last year, Parx Casino, the largest in the state, shelled out the least, $2.4 million. Presque Isle in Erie, anted up the most, $7.6 million.
Rivers paid $4.5 million, while The Meadows Racetrack and Casino in Washington County paid $5.6 million.
The majority paid between $4 million to $5 million.
Christopher Craig, who helped craft the state’s gambling law as a lawyer working for former state Sen. Vincent Fumo, said the local share was added to help municipalities offset the costs, including police and infrastructure, associated with hosting a casino.
As for the 2 percent versus the $10 million, the legislature was seeking to strike a balance between the needs of the municipality and “not creating a burden” for the casino, Mr. Craig said.
The 4 percent was put in place for Philadelphia because legislators felt gross terminal revenues for casinos in that city would generate more than $10 million a year for the local share.
“People can go back 12 years and quibble with some of the public policy decisions,” Mr. Craig said. “At the end of the day, the act has been extremely successful.”
Should Rivers prevail, Pittsburgh would lose $10 million a year in revenue, though payments the past few years have been tied up in a battle with the Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority. Rivers also is demanding about $65 million in refunds for money it paid in the past.
Pittsburgh has been using the gambling funds to prop up its ailing pension fund, as required under the Act 47 recovery plan.
If the city loses the money, it would not be able to meet that state mandate or would have to cut $10 million from “core municipal services” to do so, Mr. McNulty said. The city intends to intervene in the lawsuit.
“The local share tax payments were one of the conditions for granting the casino its license, and it never should have taken this frivolous legal action,” Mr. McNulty said.
Like the city, Denis Rudd, a professor and director of hospitality and tourism management at Robert Morris University, doesn’t think the casino has much of a beef. He said there’s definitely a cost to the municipality in hosting such a venue “and that’s the reason they get a chunk of” the revenue.
Mr. Rudd conceded $10 million is nothing to sneeze at — even for a casino like Rivers that produced $272 million in gross terminal revenue last fiscal year, 54 percent of which went for taxes, including the municipal payment. But all casinos knew going in what the cost would be, he noted.
“They agreed to it, so they should have to pay it,” he said.



Monday, December 8, 2014

A Christmas Casino Poem!


Massachusetts 'GAMING' Future
"A Christmas Casino Poem" 
by 
Bill Kearney
Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the house is barely enough food to feed a mouse. Our stockings had holes, chimney no heat, I waited in hope they’d return from the casino with something to eat. I’m a child of parents who got into bed with an industry that puts dancing fruits, bars and bells in your head.
My siblings were nestled all snug in their beds, this year it’s not sugar plums but despair in their heads. As I watch them drift off for a long winter’s nap, my prayers were for my parents to never go back. Then out in the driveway I heard such a crash, I ran to the window and threw up the sash.
Those lights of disaster made my vision clear but I couldn't comprehend what to my wondering eyes should appear, was it police cars and officers in full gear? Mom’s hysterical using words I dare not repeat. Dad’s thrown down so quick, now there’s no doubt our future is bleak.
More rapid than alcohol and drugs it came, and those in our government swear its okay. Once legal they whistled, and shouted, and called them by name! “Now Harrah’s! Now, Sugarhouse! Now, Mohegan Sun, and Hollywood! On, Parx! On Sands and Mount Airy! Throughout the state we’ll fill tax coffers for all! Now Bet away! Bet away! Bet away all!
Their money blows away in those slots like clouds in the sky, and so will their homes and families go by! So up to the house-top in debt they will be, with bankruptcy, foreclosure, and divorce bringing them to their knees.
One day in Philly I heard a man say we must stop the breeding of casino gambling degenerates today! He was dressed all in black, from his head to toe; he looked more like a gambler than a casino foe. His eyes-how they widen, his demeanor changed, as he addressed the non-ill effects of casino gambling our government proclaims.
His hands moved like pistons, his anger was seen as he exploited this industry like a well oiled machine. A bundle of safeguards he flashed out loud, things like no comps, no free booze, and no credit aloud.
Then he said something that made me think twice; “make casinos send monthly statements showing their sad plight.” I thought of my family and where we might be, if they got monthly statements and casinos never opened near me.
Before he left I heard him say, “Merry Christmas to all” then he exclaim, “if we sit back and do nothing we’re all going to pay and those long sleepless nights may come your way.”
Hopefully you will understand the importance of my cause, and you will help stop the Gaming industry from ‘BREEDING’ compulsive casino gambling degenerates who will become criminals by contacting your state legislators and telling them to put forth (CASINO MONTHLY STATEMENTS) legislation in your state.
To learn more about my credentials on this subject go on line and Google-up Bill Kearney on casino gambling.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

BREEDING ADDICTION!



Massachusetts ‘GAMING’ Future

Another example of how casinos ‘BREED’ their patrons into compulsive gambling degenerate who become criminals.

Bucks County Courier - Jul 1, 2014 - Bristol Twp. woman sentenced for taking stepson's inheritance
...
Eleanor Leistrum, of Bristol Township, is accused of stealing her stepson's inheritance and blowing it at a Bensalem casino.

A Bristol Township woman was sentenced to at least six months in prison Monday for forging her stepson’s signature on a $150,000 insurance check after her husband died.

Eleanor Leistrum, 48, pleaded guilty in February to theft by unlawful taking. Prosecutors alleged that Leistrum spent the money at Parx Casino in Bensalem, but during her sentencing hearing Monday, Leistrum and her attorney, Jeffrey Solar, denied the money was spent on gambling.

Leistrum said she spent the money on improvements to the family home with her stepson’s agreement. However, Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey Finley doubted her claims.

“I don’t find what you told me here today entirely believable,” Finley said, questioning why she would forge her stepson’s signature if he agreed to remodeling the family home.

Stepson Angelo Popovsky was 16 when his father died. He had no idea his father had left him any money until an acquaintance of Leistrum mentioned the inheritance.

Police said they discovered that in 2012 the insurance company issued a check to Leistrum after she opened an account in her and her stepson’s name. She then moved the money into her own account.

Finley ordered Leistrum to serve six to 23 months in prison. Solar said his client paid the balance of the stolen money back to the victim.

http://www.buckscountycouriertimes.com/news/local/bristol-twp-woman-sentenced-for-taking-stepson-s-inheritance/article_e2eae9eb-bd0b-5806-af68-f47f96344bd6.html
See More

Friday, June 20, 2014

Betrayal.....





Massachusetts ‘Gaming’ Future
How many more are out there committing crimes in order to feed their casino gambling addiction?
Philadelphia Inquirer - June 15, 2014 - With gambling's rise, the story of downfall
James Bryan was a gambling omnivore.
Blackjack or slots at Harrah's Philadelphia, sports betting, scratch-off lottery tickets - he played them all.
To pay for his gambling binges, Bryan, 45, traded copper for cash. He did not peddle the innards of old buildings, but new, shiny coils of wire.
A few times a week, he would drive to Accurate Metals on East Baltimore Pike in Lansdowne in his black Chevy pickup, owned by his employer, Wescott Electric.



James Bryan was a gambling omnivore.
Blackjack or slots at Harrah's Philadelphia, sports betting, scratch-off lottery tickets - he played them all.
To pay for his gambling binges, Bryan, 45, traded copper for cash. He did not peddle the innards of old buildings, but new, shiny coils of wire.
A few times a week, he would drive to Accurate Metals on East Baltimore Pike in Lansdowne in his black Chevy pickup, owned by his employer, Wescott Electric.
He would unload spindles from the truck bed, some still in shrink wrap.
Inside a sooty garage, after the copper was weighed, a cashier would calculate the trade-in value and slide Bryan a stack of bills.
Friendly and flush with money, he thought nothing of peeling off a twenty as a tip.
Over 17 months, Bryan made 164 trips to the recycling center. He sold almost 100 tons of copper, with a retail value of about $750,000.
And none of it was his.
As Bryan later admitted to police, he stole it.
The casino industry argues that the vast majority of people who gamble do so for fun.
For every 100 people, gambling experts report, 97 will win some or lose some at the casino without incident.
And then there are players like Bryan.
Gambling for them is an addiction that can lead to crime. And in Philadelphia, it is a temptation that is getting closer and closer to home.
Since legalizing gambling in 2004, Pennsylvania has been on the forefront of making gambling as convenient as possible. The state's 12 casinos draw local residents more so than tourists.
A decade ago, a gambler like Bryan would have to travel to Atlantic City or Las Vegas to feed his habit, or north on I-95 to Connecticut's big tribal resorts, or south to Delaware's racetrack casinos.
But today, gamblers in Philadelphia and surrounding counties have plenty of options. There are Parx in Bensalem, SugarHouse in Philadelphia, Harrah's Philadelphia in Chester, and the Valley Forge Casino in King of Prussia.
A fifth could be on the way. The state's Gaming Control Board is reviewing bids for another casino in the city.
The competition for that license has focused on which project could generate the most revenue for the state, while doing the least financial harm to existing casinos.
Far less attention, according to those who oppose gambling, has been placed on the social impact of another casino.
Pennsylvania sets aside a sliver of gaming revenue - $4.9 million last year - to treat and reach out to problem gamblers. But no government agency in the state or Philadelphia has determined if gambling is causing a rise in problem gambling or crime.
Some public health and law enforcement experts, however, see troubling signs.
Since 2013, 11 people in Philadelphia and the surrounding seven counties in Pennsylvania and New Jersey have been charged with theft to support their gambling habits, according to an informal survey of prosecutors by The Inquirer.
"There's a trend here, and it's disturbing to me," said Marc Furber, chief deputy district attorney in Bucks County, who oversees economic crimes.
Five of the cases were in Bucks County, home to Parx. Of those, all but one involved middle-aged women, including a bank employee and the financial secretary for a nonprofit ambulance service.
The common thread: They had access to other people's money and cravings to gamble so fierce that they would destroy relationships to feed habits.
"We see massive, massive losses that cause extreme hardship," Furber added. "The ripple effect is horrible."
The problem can be seen across Pennsylvania.
In April, a 65-year-old controller who blew $800,000 in 14 months at Sands Casino in Bethlehem was charged with writing $1.8 million in bad checks from her Allentown employer.
In March, a longtime police chief in Washington County in Western Pennsylvania was accused of using drug-investigation money to gamble at the Meadows Racetrack & Casino.
In February, the chief operating officer of a gas-drilling company in Pittsburgh pleaded guilty in federal court to embezzling $9 million - all for gambling at nearby casinos.
And in January, James Bryan was arrested for stealing from his employer of 27 years, Wescott Electric.

High expectations


In Collingdale, a Republican stronghold and racially diverse working-class town of 8,500, Bryan was a political fixture.
A project manager for Wescott Electric, he was elected to the borough council in 1994 and, for almost 13 years, served as chairman of the finance committee. He volunteered for a fire company and served as finance chairman of the local Republican Party.
Mayor Frank Kelly, 79, the longest-serving mayor in Pennsylvania, had high expectations for his weekend golfing buddy.
"Everyone figured he'd take my place," said Kelly, Collingdale's mayor for 41 years.
As a political stepping-stone, Bryan had his sights on becoming a magisterial district judge. He was so highly regarded that both parties put him on their primary tickets in the spring of 2013.
On June 28, Bryan traveled to the Pennsylvania Judicial Center in Harrisburg to take a state examination to be certified as a district judge.
He felt confident. After several failed attempts to pass the exam, he sent a text message to his boss, Joseph McColgan, saying he thought he had passed this time.
McColgan, 53, ran Wescott Electric with James Wescott, 71. It was a family business, started by Wescott's father after World War II.
Situated in an old 19th-century rug mill on the banks of the Chester Creek in Aston, the firm mostly handled big government electrical projects, generating about $10 million a year in revenue.
Bryan went to work for the two men when he was 18. Over time, he became part of the trusted inner circle.
Business blended easily with friendship.
Wescott and McColgan helped to rewire Bryan's first house. Family birthdays at the Bryan home included McColgan, known as "Boss Joe" to the Bryan children.
McColgan said he saw Bryan through dark times, too: the death of his 18-month-old twin son in 2005 and a difficult divorce a few years later.
The day Bryan went to Harrisburg, a purchasing agent at Wescott, Theresa Davidson, approached McColgan. She was troubled. Something was off, she told him.
She had a packing slip and invoice for bare copper wire for a current job. The foreman on the job, however, said he had not ordered it.
There were other slips as well.
All had been submitted by Bryan.
McColgan was heading out the door but told Davidson to put everything into a spreadsheet. They'd talk about it later.
When he returned to the office, he found Davidson waiting for him at the bottom of the steps by the front door.
She was in tears.

No inkling


In the end, gambling became almost a second job for Bryan, a divorced father.
He shelled out $1,000 at a time for scratch-off lottery tickets that he bought in bulk at a corner store, prosecutors said.
Two or three times a week, he gambled at Harrah's, losing $1,000 to $2,000 a visit.
He hid his habit from friends.
"Probably no one knew him better," said Kelly, his friend the mayor.
They golfed every weekend, often at Bryan's course, the private Springhaven Country Club. With two other golfers, they took vacations to Myrtle Beach, S.C.
Kelly said he knew that his friend sometimes bet on sports and played the numbers. But he said he knew nothing about his constant forays to Harrah's.
"No one had an inkling," Kelly said.
Least of all McColgan.
The weekend after he was tipped off by his purchasing agent, McColgan worked nonstop poring through years of invoices.
He enlisted his wife, Maryann, and daughter Ashley to help.
In a conference room, the three dug through receipts, bank checks, and packing slips. They slept little.
By Monday morning, McColgan had calculated that at least $800,000 was missing. The stealing stretched back a decade, long before Harrah's opened its doors to local gamblers in 2007.
McColgan summoned Bryan to a meeting. With his business partner at his side, he showed him a spreadsheet and pile of invoices.
"Can you explain this?" McColgan asked.
Faced with the evidence, Bryan "admitted everything," McColgan recalled.
McColgan slid a termination letter across the table for Bryan to sign.
Bryan's authoritative demeanor did not slip, McColgan remembered. He did, however, acknowledge that he had a gambling problem and seemed nervous about the prospect of prison.
"Don't turn me in," McColgan recalled him saying.

'Stabbed in the heart'


In July, the matter was referred to the Aston Police Department. Detectives trained in financial crimes found other fraudulent transactions.
Checks were made out to businesses for supplies on jobs that did not exist. Bryan would intercept the checks and cash them at a "no-questions-asked" check-cashing service in Philadelphia, detectives said.
On Jan. 28, after a six-month investigation, Delaware County District Attorney Jack Whelan asked McColgan to meet him at his office.
In his head, McColgan calculated that Bryan may have stolen more than $1 million, possibly as much as $2 million.
The truth was harsher: From 2003 to 2013, Bryan was accused of stealing $2,919,361.50.
He started out small, taking $40,497.75 in 2003, before hitting a peak in 2010 of $538,841.18.
Joseph Ryan, chief of the office's criminal investigation division, told McColgan that Bryan apparently eased off in 2011, fearing others were onto him. That year, he took only $172,768.18.
That's when Bryan switched to copper, stealing wire worth $736,723.23 in 2012 and 2013.
The news left McColgan dumbstruck. "It's like getting stabbed in the heart," he said.
With the district attorney at his side, McColgan had to break the news to his partner, who was in Florida. He called Wescott and put him on a speaker phone.
"Jim, sit down," McColgan advised.
He repeated the sum.
The room fell silent.
Wescott could not speak. Hanging up, he said: "I have to go."

'Ashamed'

At a recent pretrial hearing in Courtroom 6 at the Delaware County Courthouse in Media, McColgan and his wife arrived well before 9 a.m. They took a front-row seat, just behind the prosecutors' table.
Arriving alone, Bryan, dressed in a gray business suit, sat as far away as possible.
Neither has spoken to the other since July.
Released on $500,000 bail, Bryan is under house arrest, and his movements are monitored electronically. Approached at his home, Bryan declined to discuss his case.
His lawyer, Michael Diamondstein, said in a statement that Bryan was seeking treatment for his gambling addiction. Under terms of his bail, Bryan is only allowed to take his two sons to school on certain days, perform community-service work through the county, attend counseling, and visit his lawyer.
Bryan, Diamondstein said, is "extremely remorseful . . . ashamed and embarrassed."
Bryan is expected to enter a guilty plea July 14. He faces 10 counts of forgery, three counts of theft, and one count of receiving stolen property. Each felony theft count carries a possible sentence of 31/2 to seven years.
Diamondstein said Bryan accepted "complete and sole responsibility for his actions."
"While the casinos may have helped facilitate the loss, it was Mr. Bryan that committed the acts that lead to his arrest," Diamondstein said. "He will do everything he can - for the rest of his life if need be - to win back the trust of all of the people his actions have hurt."



Tuesday, May 6, 2014

For the casino predators, enough is never enough.

Let's not forget that PARX wants to invade Massachusetts.
Massachusetts ‘Gaming’ Future
For the casino predators, enough is never enough.

The Morning Call - May 4, 2014 - Is slot machine gambling coming to your phone?

Parx Casino wants to attract more young gamblers with gambling on mobile devices. Would Sands follow?

The typical slot machine player in Pennsylvania is a 60-year-old woman who owns a home and earns a middle-class wage, but if executives at Parx Casino get their way, she will soon be joined by a gaggle of millennials playing slots on their smartphones.

Hoping to entice barely legal gamblers to play slot machines, Parx Casino wants to give people the ability to play from their smartphone and tablets, perhaps while they update their Facebook status or scan their Twitter feed.

Read more: http://www.mcall.com/business/mc-pa-gambling-mobile-devices-20140504,0,4487569.story#ixzz30rRM9jof



Bill Kearney's photo.





Bill Kearney's photo.



Bill Kearney's photo.




Monday, April 21, 2014

Harrah's [Caesars] Philadelphia Casino & Racetrack faces hefty tax bills


Harrah's Philadelphia Casino & Racetrack faces hefty tax bills

CHESTER For the first time since it opened seven years ago, Harrah's Philadelphia Casino & Racetrack is getting hit with a property-tax bill.

And what a bill.

If it stands, the $5 million payment to three entities will make the casino not just the biggest taxpayer by far in the city of Chester, the Chester Upland School District, and Delaware County, but one of the biggest in the region.

The county Board of Assessment rejected an appeal from Harrah's last month. The company now faces a Friday deadline to file a lawsuit fighting the $218 million assessment of its 65 acres on the Delaware River.

A casino spokeswoman did not return calls last week, and a lawyer who has represented Harrah's declined to discuss its plans or potential court arguments.

But Harrah's could take its lead from other casinos in the area. Parx Casino in Bensalem and several casinos in Atlantic City are among those that have fought to have their taxes reduced, asserting that they were not as profitable as anticipated, or that the buildings had been assessed at more than their fair market value.

The added tax revenue would be especially important in long-struggling Chester, where Harrah's owes $1.6 million in property taxes this year.

The money could provide a significant boost - more than 20 percent - to city coffers. Chester collected $7.2 million in property taxes last year, City Councilman Nafis Nichols said.

"We're able to loosen up and breathe a little easier" with the money from Harrah's, he said.

The Chester Upland School District does not release its 2014-15 tax rate until July, but it would collect $2.8 million from Harrah's under its current tax rate.

Harrah's Philadelphia Casino & Racetrack was part of a Keystone Opportunity Zone that expired at the end of December.

To attract economic development to Chester, the tax-relief program exempted properties from real estate taxes. The new assessments for those properties total $21 million, in addition to the $218 million for Harrah's, Delaware County Assessment Manager John VanZelst said.

VanZelst said he expected Harrah's to appeal its assessment, which would take more than a year to resolve. The value of the casino itself would be at issue, ultimately determined by a judge.

Property owners often hire outside appraisers to provide second opinions of assessed value and present those findings in court.

"Since we're talking a lot of money and [Harrah's owners] think they have a strong case, they're probably going to take it to court," VanZelst said.

Joseph O'Brien, the lawyer who represented Harrah's before the Board of Assessment, said he could not comment on whether he would file an appeal. He declined to say what he thought would be an appropriate assessment for the casino.

"Obviously, we felt it was significantly lower than what the county had asserted," he said.

The county has already sent the casino a 2014 tax bill for $1.22 million, which Harrah's must pay even if it files an appeal.

"As far as I know, they lost and we sent out a bill," VanZelst said. "So until I'm instructed otherwise, the bill stays that way."

Beyond property taxes, state law requires casinos to turn over a portion of their revenue from slots and table games to local governments. Harrah's gave $10 million to Chester and $5 million to Delaware County last year, according to state records.

Harrah's would not be the only casino in the region to take its property-tax fight to court.

Parx is fighting its $54 million assessment in a court appeal filed in 2011. Under its current assessment, the casino owes $2.3 million in taxes this year, according to county records. It paid its 2011, 2012, and 2013 taxes under protest, according to a bond-offering document from the Bensalem Township School District.

In Atlantic City, casinos have successfully appealed tax bills, arguing that gaming revenue had fallen substantially as competition opened around Pennsylvania in recent years.

Valley Forge Casino Resort has a smaller property-tax bill; it owed $270,000 in 2014, according to Montgomery County assessment records. SugarHouse Casino in Philadelphia has not appealed its assessment of $150 million.

Harrah's has not taken steps toward fighting its assessment in the city of Chester, which has a different assessment process than the county. Its $52.5 million assessment in Chester translates to a market value of about $210 million - lower than the $294 million market value of the county's assessment.

As tax breaks expired in Chester, the Delaware County Council extended the Keystone Opportunity Zone for some properties, including land surrounding PPL Park where development plans have not materialized. PPL Park is still exempt from taxes because it is owned by a government body.

Some other property owners that lost their tax breaks also appealed. Widener University's Technology Park won the largest adjustment before the county Board of Assessment, VanZelst said; its assessment was reduced from $4.2 million to $2.4 million.

Until this year, none of top 15 taxable properties in Delaware County was in the city of Chester, which for years lacked new private development.

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/business/20140420_Harrah_s_Philadelphia_Casino___Racetrack_faces_hefty_tax_bills.html#AE3fVpLMMmqGjYzt.99