Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label ballot question. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ballot question. Show all posts

Saturday, December 5, 2015

Gambling question among 6 that appear to have cleared hurdle




Gambling question among 6 that appear to have cleared hurdle

Certified signatures delivered to secretary

Published  5:30 AM EST Dec 03, 2015


BOSTON —Massachusetts voters could be getting another chance to expand gambling in the state.

A ballot question that would allow Massachusetts to issue a second slots parlor license -- apparently for a site near the Suffolk Downs race track -- could be headed for the 2016 ballot.

Massachusetts Secretary William Galvin said the question is one of six whose supporters appear to have delivered a minimum of 64,750 certified signatures of registered voters to his office by Wednesday's deadline.

Other questions that could land on next year's ballot would legalize the recreational use of marijuana; prevent farm animals from being kept in overly restrictive cages; lift state caps on charter schools; remove Massachusetts from requirements adhering to Common Core curriculum standards; and level the playing field between large hospital chains and small community hospitals.

Backers of a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow people who earn more than $1 million a year to be taxed at a higher rate also appear to have filed enough signatures. Because constitutional amendments follow a different path to the ballot, the earliest the question could go before voters would be November 2018.

Galvin said his office still must verify the signatures.

An email sent to the person listed as the contact for the slots parlor question was not immediately returned.

The question doesn't specifically mention Suffolk Downs but says the slots parlor must be located near a horse race track. The state's only other horse race track is in Plainville, the site of the slots parlor created under the law.

The 2011 law that legalized casino gambling in Massachusetts authorized the licensing of three casinos and a single slots parlor.

The group Citizens for Farm Animal Protection said it submitted 130,000 signatures to support a ballot measure that would phase out what it called extreme confinement and lifelong immobilization of animals on factory farms as well as the sale of goods produced under those conditions.

"It does make a significant difference for thousands of animals here in Massachusetts," said Stephanie Harris, state director of The Humane Society of the United States.

Critics said the proposal could drive up the cost of eggs, veal and pork.

The Campaign for Fair Care said it collected nearly 132,000 signatures to support a question to overhaul the state's hospital payment system by reining in medical centers and boosting support to community hospitals.

Backers of a question that would lift limits on the number of charter schools allowed in Massachusetts say they filed more than 73,000 signatures.

The Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol said it collected more than 100,000 signatures for a question that would let Massachusetts residents 21 or older to possess up to 1 ounce of marijuana. It would also create a 3.75 percent state excise tax on retail marijuana sales on top of the state's 6.25 percent sales tax.

The head of a group that hoped to place a second marijuana legalization question on the ballot that did not call for an excise tax said he doesn't believe his group had collected enough signatures.

Once the signatures are verified by Galvin, he will refer the questions to lawmakers who have until May 3 to decide whether to approve the question. If they choose not to, supporters will need to collect at least an additional 10,792 signatures to secure a spot on the November, 2016 ballot.

http://www.wcvb.com/news/gambling-question-among-6-that-appear-to-have-cleared-hurdle/36772238

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Ballot Question: REPEAL THE CASINO DEAL! Have you signed?



Massachusetts advocates have enough signatures for ballot questions.....




An anti-casino leader also said people have gathered enough signatures to move ahead on a question to repeal a 2011 law that legalized casinos.


John Ribeiro of Winthrop, chairman of Repeal the Casino Deal, said the group is still collecting signatures for a ballot question to repeal the state's two-year-old casino law. Ribeiro said the group was able to hire and pay signature gatherers in a last-minute boost for the effort.

"We will definitely meet the threshold," Ribeiro said. "I think we are going to have plenty of signatures."

The group will be collecting signatures on Tuesday in Milford when voters in the town cast ballots on a referendum for a proposed $1 billion Foxwoods casino.

Repeal the Casino Deal has filed a court challenge of Attorney General Martha Coakley's decision to bar the planned ballot question to repeal the 2011 law to allow casinos in Massachusetts.

The injunction allows the coalition to collect signatures for the proposed ballot question while the challenge is pending before the state Supreme Judicial Court.





Monday, November 18, 2013

Have you signed REPEAL THE CASINO DEAL?


November 17, 2013

Mass. ballot question supporters facing deadline

BOSTON (AP) — A key deadline is approaching for supporters of proposed questions for the 2014 Massachusetts ballot.

Backers are working to collect at least 68,911 signatures around the state to allow the initiative petitions to remain alive. Those signatures must be presented to city and town clerks by Wednesday so they can be certified in time to be submitted to the Secretary of State William Galvin’s office by a Dec. 4 deadline.

Galvin said it appeared that a proposed ballot question that would update the state’s beverage deposit law to include bottled water and other non-carbonated drinks would have enough signatures to move forward.

Supporters of measures calling for a higher minimum wage, a statewide policy for earned sick time and limits on excessive hospital operating margins also were close to obtaining the necessary signatures, Galvin said.

Opponents of casino gambling are gathering signatures for a question that would repeal the state’s 2011 casino law, but may need help from the courts since Attorney General Martha Coakley has ruled the question would violate a constitutional provision against the taking of personal property.

Petitions with enough certified signatures would then go the Legislature. If lawmakers do not act on them by May, supporters must then collect an additional 11,485 signatures to have them placed on the November ballot.

http://www.eagletribune.com/latestnews/x356556418/Mass-ballot-question-supporters-facing-deadline
 

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Ballot question to repeal Massachusetts casino law cleared to move ahead by Attorney General Martha Coakley


Ballot question to repeal Massachusetts casino law cleared to move ahead by Attorney General Martha Coakley

anti.JPG
Casino opponent Rich Sorcinelli celebrates on Tuesday at the Hofbrahaus after voters in West Springfield rejected a ballot question for a planned Hard Rock casino. Anti-casino activists see the vote in West Springfield as a positive sign for a proposed statewide ballot question to repeal the state's casino law. (The Republican photo by Michael Beswick)
 
By Dan Ring, The Republican
on September 11, 2013
 
BOSTON — A statewide anti-casino coalition has filed a court challenge of the attorney general's decision to bar a planned ballot question to repeal the 2011 law to allow casinos in Massachusetts.

Attorney General Martha Coakley will agree to the challenge, called an injunction, effectively allowing the coalition to collect signatures for the proposed ballot question while the challenge is pending before the state's highest court.

In an 11-page decision, Coakley last week rejected the proposed anti-casino ballot question, ruling that it would be an unconstitutional taking of private property rights.

John F. Ribeiro of Winthrop, chairman of the Committee to Repeal the Casino Deal, said that the coalition submitted the injunction to the state Supreme Judicial Court.

Brad Puffer, spokesman for Coakley's office, said the attorney general will agree to the injunction.

That means that the attorney general's summary of the proposed repeal will be forwarded to Secretary of State William Galvin, who then prints up signature forms, so that the proponents can seek signatures while they proceed with their court challenge.

If the proponents of the ballot question fail to get the required number of signatures, however, the case is dismissed as moot.

The state Supreme Judicial Court would rule on the merits of the court challenge if the coalition succeeds in gathering enough signatures.

Ribeiro said about 500 volunteers are poised to collect the 68,911 voter signatures needed by Dec. 4 to help qualify for the ballot.

"People are even more energized to go out and collect signatures," he said. "This is about democracy.

This is beyond the casino question. This is about people having the right to vote on a critical issue that could change the state forever."

Ribeiro said the coalition is emboldened by Tuesday's vote in West Springfield to defeat the planned Hard Rock casino resort and other casino defeats around the state.

In a statement, Coakley's spokesman said, “We make our decisions to certify ballot initiatives based purely on the facts and the law and without regard to the attorney general’s policy views on the issue. As we do with all petition decisions, we work cooperatively with parties who wish to challenge our rulings. The most important thing is to get the right result.”

http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/09/ballot_question_to_repeal_stat.html