Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Bill Kearney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill Kearney. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

Sands Bethlehem: The Ultimate 1% SCAM!



Sucking every dollar out of the local economy! 

Massachusetts ‘GAMING’ Future
How much better off would our economy be if all, half, or even a quarter of the billions of dollars casino gamblers are losing annually throughout our country was sent on things like, homes, automobiles, household goods, and real entertainment?
The Morning Call - October 5, 2016 - How gamblers lose $1.5 million at Bethlehem Sands Casino in one day
BETHLEHEM — Sands Casino Resort Bethlehem raked in $533 million in the past year, according to the annual report released last week by the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board.
That means gamblers lost almost $1.5 million a day at the casino built on the former lands of Bethlehem Steel, but unless you are one of those people who walked away with an empty wallet, that makes Sands perhaps the state's most successful casino.
"I'd say the board has always viewed Sands as a very successful casino. The numbers certainly speak for themselves," said Richard McGarvey, gaming control board spokesman. "With its hotel, outlet mall and other amenities, it's certainly a casino that board members point to as a model."

Thursday, July 14, 2016

State launches shame campaign to stop underage gamblers





Massachusetts ‘GAMING’ Future
Here’s some public shame, how about putting mug shots up of all the people they cultivated into casino gambling degenerates who've became criminals because of their 24/7 gambling, free booze, cashing personal checks, interest free credit, free play, and those so-called freebies known as “COMPS” that make many justify their losses.
The Morning Call – July 14, 2016 - State launches shame campaign to stop underage gamblers
Underage gamblers at Pennsylvania casinos have become such a concern that state regulators are turning to a surprisingly low-tech weapon: public shame.
The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board has launched a campaign to inform the under-21 set that if they're caught they'll not only get a criminal record and be banned from every casino in the state, but their picture and arrest summary will be added to a sort of public shaming site, along with people who have been charged with cheating, counterfeiting and leaving their children in the car while they gamble.

Comments





State launches shame campaign to stop underage gamblers

Some of them use fake IDs, some have the good fortune of looking like their older sibling or friend and some just find a way to distract the security guards long enough to sneak past.
Underage gamblers at Pennsylvania casinos have become such a concern that state regulators are turning to a surprisingly low-tech weapon: public shame.
The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board has launched a campaign to inform the under-21 set that if they're caught they'll not only get a criminal record and be banned from every casino in the state, but their picture and arrest summary will be added to a sort of public shaming site, along with people who have been charged with cheating, counterfeiting and leaving their children in the car while they gamble.
The campaign comes as Sands Casino Resort Bethlehem and the Gaming Control Board's office of enforcement reached terms on a consent decree Wednesday to fine the casino for failing to prevent underage gambling. Despite upgrades to its fake ID-reading technology, thousands of hours of training and retraining security guards and even changes to the casino floor entrance, Sands couldn't keep three underage gamblers from entering in three separate incidents this year.
So, if the gaming board approves the consent decree next month, Sands will pay a fine — its seventh for the same maddening problem. It has already paid $341,000 in previous fines, but it's far from alone in its frustration. Pennsylvania has doled out $2.2 million in underage fines, hitting every casino at least once.
"The board has seen this flourish year after year," said Doug Harbach, a Gaming Control Board spokesman. "It's given [board members] enough concern to launch a campaign designed to let these young people know exactly what they'll be facing if they do it."
The $250,000 What's Really at Stake campaign is primarily a web page explaining to under-21 gamblers the consequences, and an updated set of rules to back it up. Included in those rules is a criminal record for underage gambling, fines and a ban from all Pennsylvania casinos that the offender won't be able to request be lifted until after their 22nd birthday.
Perhaps the biggest deterrent will be their mug shots and arrest details placed on the web page. The page at whatsreallyatstake.com already links to a gaming board site that include the photos of 130 youths, mixed in with photos of another 400 offenders.
While the gaming control board pushed voting on the Sands decree back until August, it did approve a consent decree that includes a $10,000 fine against Valley Forge Casino for allowing an 18-year-old woman onto the casino floor, where she was served nine drinks over 21/2 hours.
It's not for a lack of trying to stop it, Sands Casino CEO Mark Juliano said. Sands, which was last fined in January, has upgraded the hand-held machines guards use to read ID cards, adopted a policy that everyone who looks younger than 30 be carded, and installed a plan of training, discipline and termination for guards who let people under 21 slip through.
Most recently, Sands replaced the old rope-style barriers that funnel people into an entrance chute at the casino floor with hard fencing that is more difficult to jump and impossible to climb under.
"Nobody wants underage gamblers on their floor. It's not good for anybody," Juliano said. "We're aggressive in working toward 100 percent elimination, but when humans are involved there's always going to be a few that get past."
Merely trying to get past the guard is not a crime and Sands turns away thousands of people every year. Harbach noted that in some cases, it's an honest mistake. While Pennsylvania allows people 18 or older to buy lottery tickets and bet on horse races, the legal age to gamble in casinos is 21.
Those under 21 who make it to the casino floor can be charged if they're caught ordering a drink or gambling. A few sneak around the barriers and some have fake IDs so good they beat even the newest card-readers. But the most common way around the guard is one sibling or friend passing their ID to someone who resembles them.
"The board recognizes that it can be difficult to stop," said Richard McGarvey, a Gaming Control Board spokesman. "But we also expect the casino to work hard to stop it. It's a serious problem that no one takes lightly."
The good news about the new campaign is that it is not funded by taxpayers, Harbach said. The entire $250,000 price tag comes from money confiscated from the ill-gotten winnings of people arrested on the casino floor.
The bad news is that there is a question whether this campaign is finding its way to the young wannabe gamblers that are its target. Its Twitter account, opened in April, has just 19 followers.



Friday, May 29, 2015

CBS Las Vegas: AGA Challenges Proposed Credit Card Ban at Casinos




Massachusetts ‘GAMING’ Future
 
If it were up to The American Gaming Association they would let casino patrons sell their body parts in order for them to gamble.

American Gaming Association (AGA)

Published on May 22, 2015
The American Gaming Association is all riled up at a suggestion to ban government credit cards at casinos. The association says such a move singles them out and reflects a misunderstanding of the gaming industry. They want to know if such a ban would prevent government employees from renting a hotel room in a casino, or using retail and restaurants as well. The recommendation came from the Department of Defense, after an audit revealed DOD workers used their government credit cards to rack up nearly a million dollars on gambling in Las Vegas and Atlantic City.
CBS Las Vegas: AGA Challenges Proposed Credit Card Ban at Casinos
 






Sunday, May 24, 2015

Casinos support tax avoidance







 
This proves once more how clueless, naive and negligent our lawmakers are when it comes to how they let casinos operate. Here’s just one example! Only slot players who win over $1200 have to sign an IRS tax form that reports their winnings. Table game players don’t have to sign anything.

 Therefore millions of dollars in table game winnings is never reported. The Fed’s and casino states governments don’t get a dime from those winnings. Now if you’re wondering why this is, it’s because casino operators have conned our lawmakers into believing there is no way for them to know how much patrons win at table games. Now isn't that strange considering that over 80% of table game players are enrolled in casino reward card programs. These programs track the amount of time and money gambled in the casino. Even without these programs do you believe with the technology out there today casinos can’t make table players who win over $1200 sign an IRS tax form. With that said, don’t you think it’s unfair that slot player have to report, but table game player don’t?
Philadelphia Inquirer - May 23, - 2015 - Gambling tax proposal would affect casinos and governments
When Mercedes Stephens recently hit a jackpot at Sugar/House Casino, her slot machine flashed the faces of 12 cartoon buffaloes - and then it locked up.
Stephens, 47, had won more than $1,200, which meant she had to stop playing and sign an IRS tax form that reports her winnings.
The process took about five minutes, she said. But the gaming industry warns that the interruption could soon eat away at casino profits and - ironically - billions in gambling tax revenue that flow into Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
That's because the Internal Revenue Service wants to lower the reporting threshold on slot winnings from $1,200 to $600. If that happens, casino industry supporters say, gamblers will spend more time filling out W2 forms and less time playing.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

image: http://media.philly.com/images/SUGAR166525874.jpg
A casino delaer at work. (TOM GRALISH / Staff Photographer / File )
A casino delaer at work. (TOM GRALISH / Staff Photographer / File )

 
 
Last updated: Saturday, May 23, 2015



When Mercedes Stephens recently hit a jackpot at SugarHouse Casino, her slot machine flashed the faces of 12 cartoon buffaloes - and then it locked up.

Stephens, 47, had won more than $1,200, which meant she had to stop playing and sign an IRS tax form that reports her winnings.

The process took about five minutes, she said. But the gaming industry warns that the interruption could soon eat away at casino profits and - ironically - billions in gambling tax revenue that flow into Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

That's because the Internal Revenue Service wants to lower the reporting threshold on slot winnings from $1,200 to $600. If that happens, casino industry supporters say, gamblers will spend more time filling out W2 forms and less time playing.

"Not only is the casino not earning revenue, but the state is losing money, and so are local governments," said Chris Moyer, a spokesman for the American Gaming Association. "It would be detrimental to local and state governments and the revenues they receive from the gaming industry."
 
Analysts agree the proposed rule would affect casino profits in states with casinos, including New Jersey and Pennsylvania, which leads the country in gambling tax revenue. But experts and casino owners have predicted varying degrees of impact.
 
For instance, a spokesman at Penn National, owner of the Hollywood Casino in Dauphin County, told The Inquirer it would suffer a five percent - or $6.5 million loss - in local and state tax revenue.
 
But Alex Bumazhny of Fitch Ratings said casinos would take only a fraction of the hit that smoking bans have taken on profits, which can be as much as 10 percent.
 
Analyst Cory Morowitz of Morowitz Gaming Advisors L.L.C. said the proposal "will have real costs to the gaming industry."
 
"Slot revenues are already declining across most markets and properties," Morowitz said. "This will only make matters worse."
 
Pennsylvania casinos took in $2.3 billion in slot revenue in fiscal year 2013-14, according to the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board. Slightly more than half of it - 55 percent - was taxed.

The biggest chunk, 34 percent, or nearly $800 million, went to the state and was mostly dedicated to property-tax relief. Four percent, or about $92 million, went to towns and counties that have casinos. For instance, SugarHouse paid about $7 million to Philadelphia, which spends that money on wage-tax reduction.
 
At SugarHouse, about 1,700 people each month fill out W2 forms after winning $1,200 or more. Under the proposed rule, that number would grow to 10,000 a month, said Wendy Hamilton, SugarHouse general manager.
 
She said it often takes eight to 10 minutes for someone to complete a tax form before getting back to playing.
 
"We think it's a horrible idea," she said. "We'd need to hire a couple more people and buy more equipment."
 
The current reporting threshold for slots has been in effect since 1977, when $1,200 was more like $4,700, accounting for inflation. The IRS has proposed the $600 threshold to bring slot winnings in line with the reporting requirements of business and trade revenue and because technological advances have made tracking winnings easier.
 
But Frank Fantini, publisher of Fantini's Gaming Report, an industry newsletter, said slots players lose most of their winnings back to the casinos anyway.
 
"It's a lot of work for very little purpose," he said of the proposed threshold. "And if the players don't feel entertained anymore because they're filling out tax forms, are they going to do something else on a Friday night?"

Gaming companies have sent out a petition to casinos and their patrons across the country, and an American Gaming Association official will speak at an IRS hearing on the matter June 17. The federal agency is also collecting public comments on the proposed change until June 2.
 
Stephens, who won that jackpot at SugarHouse, said the proposed IRS rule would cause some players to bet less money to avoid the lower threshold.
 
"Everything else is already taxed enough," she said. "Give people a break."

 

610-313-8118
@Ben_Finley
This is a corrected version of an earlier article.

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20150523_Gambling_tax_proposal_would_affect_casinos_and_governments.html#tJbzkXCD8Q5R1URU.99

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Judge: Unshuffled cards void game, winnings must be returned




Massachusetts ‘GAMING’ Future
Even when casinos screw up they still win. Now if the gamblers would have lost $1.5 million do you think they would have gotten their money back?

The Associated Press - February 12, 2015
Judge: Unshuffled cards void game, winnings must be returned
ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) - Gamblers who won $1.5 million at a casino after realizing the cards hadn't been shuffled have been ordered to return the money.
State Superior Court Judge Donna Taylor has sided with the Golden Nugget casino in its long-running dispute with 14 gamblers who say the fault wasn't theirs and they should be allowed to keep their winnings.
At issue were games of mini-baccarat played in April 2012 using decks of cards the casino had paid a manufacturer to pre-shuffle but that hadn't been shuffled. Once players realized the pattern in which the cards were emerging they drastically upped their bets from $10 a hand to $5,000 and won 41 straight hands.
In the ruling, issued Monday and publicized by the casino on Thursday, the judge determined the games were illegal under state law because they didn't conform to gambling regulations specifying the way each game must be played.




Massachusetts ‘GAMING’ Future

Even when casinos screw up they still win. Now if the gamblers would have lost $1.5 million do you think they would have gotten their money back?

The Associated Press - February 12, 2015

Judge: Unshuffled cards void game, winnings must be returned

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) - Gamblers who won $1.5 million at a casino after realizing the cards hadn't been shuffled have been ordered to return the money.

State Superior Court Judge Donna Taylor has sided with the Golden Nugget casino in its long-running dispute with 14 gamblers who say the fault wasn't theirs and they should be allowed to keep their winnings.

At issue were games of mini-baccarat played in April 2012 using decks of cards the casino had paid a manufacturer to pre-shuffle but that hadn't been shuffled. Once players realized the pattern in which the cards were emerging they drastically upped their bets from $10 a hand to $5,000 and won 41 straight hands.

In the ruling, issued Monday and publicized by the casino on Thursday, the judge determined the games were illegal under state law because they didn't conform to gambling regulations specifying the way each game must be played.

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/business/20150212_ap_c7cf8db578c44de8b07ca10b8227f35a.html#y18Z6qpxu5d2pyww.99
 




ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) - Gamblers who won $1.5 million at a casino after realizing the cards hadn't been shuffled have been ordered to return the money.

State Superior Court Judge Donna Taylor has sided with the Golden Nugget casino in its long-running dispute with 14 gamblers who say the fault wasn't theirs and they should be allowed to keep their winnings.

At issue were games of mini-baccarat played in April 2012 using decks of cards the casino had paid a manufacturer to pre-shuffle but that hadn't been shuffled. Once players realized the pattern in which the cards were emerging they drastically upped their bets from $10 a hand to $5,000 and won 41 straight hands.

In the ruling, issued Monday and publicized by the casino on Thursday, the judge determined the games were illegal under state law because they didn't conform to gambling regulations specifying the way each game must be played.


"The dealer did not pre-shuffle the cards immediately prior to the commencement of play, and the cards were not pre-shuffled in accordance with any regulation," the judge wrote. "Thus, a literal reading of the regulations ... entails that the game violated the (Casino Control) Act, and consequently was not authorized."
 
She ruled that the gamblers must return any cash paid to them by the casino and any outstanding chips in their possession. The casino in turn must refund the gamblers the money they first put up to play.
 
The Golden Nugget was pleased with the court's ruling, casino general manager Tom Pohlman said.
 
"We believe it was the right decision," he said.
 
A lawyer for the gamblers did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment on the decision. A lawyer for the casino's partner, Landry's Inc., said he expects the decision to be appealed.
 
The Golden Nugget bought what were supposed to be pre-shuffled cards from a Kansas City manufacturer, which acknowledged in court it failed to shuffle them. The casino said its litigation with the manufacturer has been resolved but a confidentiality agreement prevents it from revealing details.
 
The judge's ruling was the latest in a long series of decisions that have seesawed between favoring the casino and favoring the gamblers. The owner of the casino, Texas billionaire Tillman Fertitta, originally decided to let the players keep their winnings, but that offer was contingent on them dropping other claims they made against the casino, which they declined to do.
 
The casino paid out about $500,000 in winnings for the disputed games. About $1 million in chips remains outstanding.

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/business/20150212_ap_c7cf8db578c44de8b07ca10b8227f35a.html#Woo3mkZSZjFAEsYc.99