Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label David Nunes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Nunes. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Selling Fall River Down The River?

Excerpts below -- worth reading in its entirety from Fall River Herald News about Mayor Flanagan selling Fall River down the river to win re-election.

Poor man's confused!




City Councilor Linda Pereira said that during contract negotiations with the firefighters, the union requested a 4 percent raise, but Flanagan offered 7.5 percent, and education and clothing allowance go into the base pay, increasing a pension and further burdening the pension system.
“I had a conversation about that with the mayor because it was wrong to do,” Pereira said. “ ... And I know you as a union representative said (to Flanagan) can you afford this, and he told you yes. ... You are not the only ones in this community that have been deceived because I’ve, too, been deceived.”

 It was the same agreement Flanagan negotiated with the police union, she said.


Firefighters union, City Council say SAFER application from Aug. 2013 contradicts mayor's recent statements

Herald News Photo | Jack Foley |
[ON LINK]
Fall River Fire Department District Chief James Mellen, left, who is vice president of the firefighters Local 1314, points out what he says are discrepancies in Mayor Will Flanagan's statements regarding proposed fire department staffing levels. Seated next to Mellen is the union local's president, Firefighter Jason Burns. Union members in the audience are wearing white T-shirts.


Jo C. Goode
Herald News Staff Reporter Posted Mar. 26, 2014

FALL RIVER — Mayor Will Flanagan’s administration identified a $10 million budget shortfall in August 2013 and acknowledged that a reduction in firefighters would put the city’s safety at risk, according to information contained in a 2013 SAFER grant application.

But those facts contradict recent statements made by the administration claiming that the shortfall wasn’t discovered until January and claims by Flanagan that the planned layoffs of 60 firefighters would still keep the city within federal fire safety standards.

During the public comment portion of the City Council meeting Tuesday night, union representatives of the firefighters Local 1314 outlined those facts after a request from City Councilor Michael Miozza to review the 2013 SAFER grant.

Union President Jason Burns said that, when he was hired as a firefighter for the city, he took an oath to protect and serve, whether it was to fight fires or respond to other emergencies.

“Tonight, it’s a little bit different. But it’s still protecting and serving,” Burns said. “I’m here to sound the alarm, not with my words, but the papers before you, in the mayor’s words.”

Burns said Flanagan was either being untruthful to the federal government or untruthful to the residents.

Contacted Tuesday night, Flanagan said he didn’t recall the details of the SAFER grant application and would meet with the financial team today and will make a public comment after the meeting.

The city is seeking funding for 16 firefighters, which would total more than $3.2 million. It identified in the application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency that it was committed to funding the 79 firefighter positions currently paid for through a $14.4 million SAFER grant awarded in 2011.

But in February, Flanagan announced plans to lay off more than 30 percent of the fire department staff — 60 firefighters. It would reduce the complement of firefighters from 213 to 153.

Until December, according to firefighter union representatives, Flanagan had promised the department that the city would fund a staff of 200 firefighters.

In the application, a projected $10 million gap was identified as the reason the city could not support its staffing needs.

The fiscal 2015 budget shortfall wasn’t made public until this month, and it wasn’t mentioned by City Administrator Cathy Ann Viveiros and Treasurer John Nunes when they delivered the City Council’s first quarterly budget update in January.

The council briefings passed an ordinance requiring the administration to make quarterly updates on the municipal budget and the water and sewer enterprise funds.

During questioning by city councilors, Viveiros and Nunes reiterated that the shortfall was found in January, but Miozza quizzed Nunes, who was part of the finance team at the time the grant application was written, on whether he was aware of the $10 million gap in August.

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Flanagan: We won't tell you where it is.....


but tell us how to mitigate....




This Thursday. Hastily organized. Gonna be interesting. And I suppose our one and only chance to have our say. Please, everyone who can, attend and speak.

He says he is limiting the discussion to the host agreement. No discussion given to location

Hearing on proposed Fall River casino scheduled for Thursday

  • Public hearing to take place at 6:30 p.m. in Government Center.
  • 1

    Sunday, March 2, 2014

    Friday, February 14, 2014

    Fall River City Councilors: Hold an open mind on gambling proposition



    Dear City Councilors:
    I am asking you to hold an open mind on the current proposal for a gambling casino in Fall River until the proposal is in and has been analyzed carefully. I write as an individual, but I am treasurer of Citizens for the Common Good, a group opposed to casino gambling.
    Several proposals for gambling have taken place here. Both have failed. The first was a proposal for gambling boats up and down the Taunton River, about 15 or so years ago. A more serious proposal was that of the Aquinnah tribe to purchase land in the industrial park for a bingo hall which promised to lead to a casino as soon as the law changed. This failed after significant debate because the City Council (wisely in my judgement) refused to release the land for sale to the tribe, and voters in a referendum failed to override the city council vote.
    We now have a proposal for a $750,000 investment by Foxwoods. Multiple hotels, restaurants and convention centers, with 3000 to 5,000 jobs. Certainly the proposed benefits are widely touted. But do we want such a thing? Certainly we need carefully to examine the pros and cons, not just figure out the best site, send an application to Boston and lobby with the governor and gambling commission.
    Gambling is a poor deal for Fall River. We must remember continually that the purpose of the gambling casino is to make a profit, to take money from the citizens of Fall River and elsewhere, and that a gambling casino produces nothing useful or saleable. Since it is pretty clearly established that the closer a gambling casino is to a the more customers from that city, we will be hit the hardest. And since it is also pretty clearly established that a very large percentage of any gambling casino's profits come from a small proportion of customers (perhaps addicts is the right word), we in Fall River are again hit hard.
    There are other costs. These will come forth.
    Most of all I urge you, elected leaders of our community to study carefully this matter. You have responsibilities as citizens and city leaders and as members of the City Council.
    Thank you for your attention reading this.
    (The Rev.) Jim Hornsby

    Wednesday, February 5, 2014

    To Fall River City Councilors:





    Dear City Councilors:


    I am asking you to hold an open mind on the current proposal for a gambling casino in Fall River until the proposal is in and has been analyzed carefully. I write as an individual, but I am treasurer of Citizens for the Common Good, a group opposed to casino gambling.


    Several proposals for gambling have taken place here. Both have failed. The first was a proposal for gambling boats up and down the Taunton River, about 15 or so years ago. A more serious proposal was that of the Aquinnah tribe to purchase land in the industrial park for a bingo hall which promised to lead to a casino as soon as the law changed. This failed after significant debate because the City Council (wisely in my judgement) refused to release the land for sale to the tribe, and voters in a referendum failed to override the city council vote.


    We now have a proposal for a $750,000,000 investment by Foxwoods. Multiple hotels, restaurants and convention centers, with 3000 to 5,000 jobs. Certainly the proposed benefits are widely touted. But do we want such a thing? Certainly we need carefully to examine the pros and cons, not just figure out the best site, send an application to Boston and lobby with the governor and gambling commission.


    Gambling is a poor deal for Fall River. We must remember continually that the purpose of the gambling casino is to make a profit, to take money from the citizens of Fall River and elsewhere, and that a gambling casino produces nothing useful or saleable. Since it is pretty clearly established that the closer a gambling casino is to a the more customers from that city, we will be hit the hardest. And since it is also pretty clearly established that a very large percentage of any gambling casino's profits come from a small proportion of customers (perhaps addicts is the right word), we in Fall River are again hit hard.


    There are other costs. These will come forth.


    Most of all I urge you, elected leaders of our community to study carefully this matter. You have responsibilities as citizens and city leaders and as members of the City Council.


    Thank you for your attention reading this.


    (The Rev.) Jim Hornsby 
     
     
     
     

    Monday, February 3, 2014

    Fall River's hand is weak on Foxwoods casino proposal



    Letter: Fall River's hand is weak on Foxwoods casino proposal    


    Posted Feb. 1, 2014          

    We need jobs in Fall River, but a casino is no silver bullet.

    I do not buy that this type of business will increase crime; we already have crime.

    I do believe that casinos are breeding grounds for organized crime, generally speaking.

    Additionally, after the construction is complete, the majority of employment that would remain is lower income: wait staff, cleaning crews, low-end security.

    While the city would gain a higher-end taxpayer, there will be property tax collected and possibly a small revenue-sharing deal, but make no mistake:

    Whatever profit is made will be shipped out of the area.

    I am also concerned for the current restaurants in our city. Adding a casino could expose them to a new clientele base they would otherwise not have access to. It could also monopolize the market by offering extremely good dinning deals to lure customers in for an extended period of time, putting their competition out of business.

    Take a stroll to Foxwoods or Mohegan Sun and count the number of hospitality type businesses outside the casino property in a one-mile radius.

    It really seems Mayor Will Flanagan loves to gamble with the city.

    A casino in our community is a gamble, and our hand at this table is weak at best.

    Given the right location, namely on the waterfront, a well planned all inclusive resort could be a draw to our city.

    Something in the woods will be just that, something in the woods.

    In any case, this is far from a "made" deal, with only one casino slated for southeastern Massachusetts.

    Expect a showdown on Beacon Hill or at least a grudge match with Taunton.

    Daniel Botelho

    Fall River

     - See more at: http://www.heraldnews.com/article/20140201/OPINION/140209704/2011#sthash.1SAUpFYs.dpuf

    Tuesday, January 28, 2014

    Flanagan Does It Again!

    Mayor Flanagan genuflected before the Predatory Gambling Industry last time around and now can't wait to do the same with developers [the Foxwoods/Nunes Duo] that lied to Milford residents who had the sense to inform themselves and toss them out.

    Once again, the LOW WAGE JOB projections are OVERSTATED, Foxwoods is laying off in Connecticut because of declining revenues and Gambling Market Saturation.

    Predatory Gambling has NEVER been economic development - Atlantic City is the poster child for all that is wrong with Predatory Gambling!

    How do you negotiate without a SITE?

    Check out FACTS posted here:

    Casino Free Milford


    Flanagan: Deal between Fall River, Foxwoods to be announced Tuesday

    Mayor Will Flanagan said casino developer would invest $750 million in the project that would include a 140,000 square foot gaming floor and amenities


    Herald News Staff Reporter
    Posted Jan. 27, 2014 @ 2:03 pm
    FALL RIVER — Foxwoods Casino and the investment group Crossroads Massachusetts LLC are looking to build a destination resort casino in the city after a failed attempt in Milford, Mayor Will Flanagan said today.

    "We are ready to go," said Flanagan, "we just need a site."



    Flanagan said the casino developers would invest $750 million in the project that would include a 140,000 square foot gaming floor, approximately 20 restaurants, a 350-room hotel, a "name brand" shopping mall, an entertainment arena, a convention center and spa.

    In November, Milford voters soundly voted against plans to build a $1 billion resort casino. Flanagan said the day after the vote, he received a call from David Nunes, the chief operating officer of Foxwoods Massachusetts.

    "He said I want to come to Fall River," Flanagan said, " I said okay, let's talk about the city."

    Subsequent to that call, Flanagan and members of his administration met with Nunes and Foxwoods Casino CEO Scott Butera, he said. At the meeting they agreed to move forward with plans to locate a smaller scale casino and look at possible sites in the city.

    Flanagan will officially announce Foxwoods interest in building in the city during a press conference with Butera and Nunes tomorrow. The casino developers have looked at several sites in the city already, Flanagan said, that could possibly sustain the development that requires 30 to 70 acres, although no location has been identified.

    Flanagan and the Foxwoods officials will also announce the formation of a site selection committee with appointees being Robert Mellion, president of the Fall River Area Chamber of Commerce & Industry; Ken Fiola, vice president of the Fall River Office of Economic Development; John Sbrega, president of Bristol Community College; Joseph Camara, City Council president; Joseph Vienna, director of the Fall River Career Center; and Carl Garcia, chairman of the Workforce Investment Board and owner of Carl's Collision Center.

    "Our goal is to have a site under agreement in the very near future," Flanagan said.

    Flanagan said for him, bringing a casino to the city "is about LOW WAGE job creation," although he declined to immediately release the number of jobs that would be generated with the construction of the resort casino.

    "My mission is that all jobs be Fall River preference and priority, so all city residents have first access at these jobs," Flanagan said.

    Flanagan said he has two sites in mind at this time, one on the waterfront and one that is not, although no offers have been made on the properties.

    Once Foxwoods secures a site for a casino, Flanagan said the issue will go to the voters as a ballot question, which he predicted will get overwhelming support. He wants it to go before the voters as soon as possible.






    See more at: http://www.heraldnews.com/article/20140127/NEWS/140126804#sthash.I3x9BaQa.dpuf

    Friday, December 27, 2013

    Milford: Bravo!



    From casinos to water rates, the top 10 stories in 2013 in the Milford area

    By Lindsay Corcoran/Daily News staff
    Posted Dec 26, 2013
     
    393231 MA_MD_casino vote.jpg

    Marshall Wolff/for Wicked Local and Daily News

    Milford Free Casino Co-Chairmen Steve Trettel, left, and John Seaver, rear left, celebrate with the crowd on Nov. 19 after the results are announced on the casino referendum at Pinz in Milford.

     
     
    The Milford region was an exciting place to be in 2013, with a casino proposal, a first look at the proposed expansion of the regional hospital, a local town celebrating 300 years and the implementation of a statewide medical marijuana law.
     
    Take a look at the list of our top ten stories of 2013:

    1. Considered by many to be the biggest thing to ever to happen in Milford or the region, the casino proposal dominated the news throughout the year. While developer David Nunes first proposed the idea of a casino in Milford in 2009, things didn’t get serious until he filed a last minute application with the state gaming commission in January. Then Foxwoods, operator of a casino in Connecticut, signed on and the idea turned into a $1 billion proposal. The project had its ups and downs, between promises of over $30 million up front and then annually then with drastic changes to the plans, infighting among partners and concerns over financing bringing it down. Many eyes were on Milford as their proposal was one of three to vie for one eastern Massachusetts license and one of only a handful of proposals across the state. In the end, though, Milford voters spoke loud and clear, defeating the proposal by a 2-1 margin on Nov. 19.

     

    Friday, November 22, 2013

    Foxwoods, Sticky Fingers Piontkowski and the Gam[bl]ing Commission

    This is all so confusing!

    Sticky Fingers Piontkowski takes + $1 MILLION that is unexplained...well, plus a bunch of other stuff.....

    No one asks questions...the media doesn't ask about the illegal PLAINRIDGE RAFFLE....town leaders don't ask...AG Martha 'Always Running For Higher Office' Coakley refuses to address the issue.

     And the Gam[bl]ing Commission....?

    Former Chairman of Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation Sentenced to 18 Months in Federal Prison

    thomas
    Michael Thomas, the former Chairman of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Council, was sentenced to 18 months of imprisonment for embezzling from the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation.
    On July 24, 2013, a jury found Thomas guilty of one count of theft from an Indian tribal organization and two counts of theft from an Indian tribal government receiving federal funds.

    “Mr. Thomas’s embezzlement of more than $100,000 was not only an abuse of his position as Chairman of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, but also a theft of federal funds,” stated Acting U.S. Attorney Daly. “The U.S. Attorney’s Office is committed to prosecuting corrupt officials at all levels of government – federal, state, local and tribal – and I commend the FBI and Department of the Interior’s Office of Inspector General for their diligent investigation of this matter.”

    “Today’s sentence is especially important because it holds Mr. Thomas accountable for stealing federal dollars to support a lifestyle which he could have legitimately afforded on his own,” stated FBI Special Agent in Charge Ferrick. “During these particularly severe fiscal times, Mr. Thomas’ abuse of position and unauthorized use of tribal money were done with a sense of entitlement and without ambiguity. The FBI is most appreciative of the efforts of the United States Attorney’s Office and the Department of the Interior’s Office of Inspector General for working with us to investigate and prosecute the corruption of public officials at all levels.”

    According to the evidence at trial, between October 2007 and April 2009, Thomas used an American Express card that was issued to him by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation (“MPTN”) for official MPTN government purposes to charge more than $100,000 in unauthorized personal expenses.

    Thomas used the card to pay for monthly satellite television service for his home, satellite radio service for his vehicle, mobile phone service for other individuals, car service to transport his mother to kidney dialysis treatments and the purchase of personal computers. Thomas knew that the expenses were personal, and that his use of the credit card was in violation of a Tribal Council Resolution.
    Judge Arterton will issue a restitution order after further court proceedings.


    http://centralctpost.com/2013/11/19/former-chairman-of-mashantucket-pequot-tribal-nation-sentenced-to-18-months-in-federal-prison/

    We Are ALL Neighbors!

    Although the sentiments were expressed several days ago, they express the admiration we all feel about the great educational effort in Milford, Palmer and East Boston...and elsewhere in communities that educated themselves about the issue.

    We are all neighbors! Let's continue to support each other for the betterment of the Commonwealth.

    Ali Chenault
    MFI (Massachusetts Family Institute)
    Dear Friend of the family,

    Yesterday, in the latest of a string of defeats for predatory gambling in MA, the citizens of Milford rejected a planned casino in their town. With 57 percent of registered voters participating, the $1 billion Foxwoods-backed gambling resort proposal was trounced 6,361 to 3,480 in a town-wide referendum. This, coupled with the victories in Palmer and East Boston, continues to confirm that the people of our Commonwealth overwhelmingly DO NOT want what the legislature foisted upon us with their deal to allow three massive casinos statewide.
    ...

    This victory could not have come at a better time. TODAY IS THE FINAL DAY FOR COLLECTING SIGNATURES FOR THE STATE WIDE REFERENDUM to eliminate predatory gambling from MA once and for all. Our internal numbers show that we are very close to the requirement of 68,911 certified signatures. Every name counts. If you haven’t delivered your petitions to their respective town halls yet, they MUST be delivered by TODAY in order to be counted. AND PLEASE TRY TO COLLECT 5 MORE ON THE WAY TO YOUR TOWN HALL!

    This has truly been a David versus Goliath effort, with the casino companies spending millions of dollars to influence voters. But our broad coalition of dedicated men and women have knocked them back on their heels. If we are successful in getting the repeal question on the ballot for November 2014 with this petition drive, we will be able to hand over the issue to the good people of this Commonwealth. So far the record shows they will make the right decision.

    For our families,

    Milford




    Milford voters say no to $1b casino proposal

    The field dwindles for resort license for Greater Boston


    Tuesday, November 19, 2013

    Wise Milford Voters Rejected Predatory Gambling!

    Maybe someone will learn how to loose gracefully.....it's not the Gambling Industry!

    Milford voters defeat Foxwoods-backed casino proposal

     
    The Bay State suburbs have proven to be the graveyard of casino dreams, and Milford voters followed suit, defeating the proposal 6,361 to 3,480 in a town-wide referendum. Turnout was 57 percent of 17,400 registered voters, according to the town clerk’s office.
     
     
     
     
     

    Bravo Milford!


    WIN!



    All generations! We DON'T want it!
    Casino-Free Milford added 2 new photos.

    Look before you leap



    MORGANELLI:

    Norwich, CT has suffered collateral damage as a result of Foxwoods CT. A phone call to their local realty office reveals the TRUTH and a FOREWARNING to Milford.....“It’s the worst thing that ever happened to our town."

    Plain and Simple......'NO!'
     
    Posted Nov 18, 2013


    I am of a second generation to be born in Milford. After my marriage to Dr. Peter Morganelli, we chose to remain in Milford and raise our children here.

    Milford has always been a special town to me. I have grandchildren attending schools here.

    The thought that many people seem to value the income from a casino more than life itself, and choose to overlook and justify all of the negative effects known to other casino towns is overwhelming to me.

    I placed a call to a realtor’s office in Norwich Connecticut, one of the hardest hit by the presence of a casino. The first response to me was “It’s the worst thing that ever happened to our town.” A long negative list followed.

    One home in my neighborhood recently sold, but three prospective couples refused to consider this lovely home because of a possible casino. Recently, sellers in a nice neighborhood lost a contract the day after signatures were signed because the buyers learned about the casino.

    Some people attempt to mislead residents into believing house values will go up because of a casino. Read the recent article in the Milford Daily News regarding lagging sales prices in Milford
    Do the other nine Massachusetts towns that voted No Casino know something that we don’t?
    Protect our community before it’s too late. Vote NO on Nov.19.

    BARBARA MORGANELLI
    Milford

    Monday, November 18, 2013

    Milford NO! Vote Tomorrow!

    Look what Foxwoods did to Connecticut!

    Kock 'em Dead with a NO! Vote Tomorrow!

    And then let's REPEAL THE CASINO DEAL!




    Casino Vote is tomorrow!

    Casino Free Milford has asked for volunteers from the surrounding communities. If you would like to hold a sign at a street corner in Milford today or tomorrow they would welcome your participation.

    Volunteers are welcome at Wendys(corner of Dilla and Cedar) Today from 3:30 - 6:30.

    Also on Tuesday anytime(7 a.m. to 8 p.m.) at the polling stations.

    The polling stations are as follows:

    Senior Center, 60 North Bow St

    Italian American Vets Hall 4 Hayward Field

    Portugese Club 119 Prospect Heights

    Feel free to post on other boards, FB pages, etc...

    Thanks


    Keep Milford Casino-Free.
    Our mailing address is:

    Casino-Free Milford
    P.O. Box 145
    Milford, MA 01757
     
     

    Sunday, November 17, 2013

    Milford: NO Thing to gain!

    Foxwoods has SOOOO much baggage.....this exemplifies ....


    REPEAL THE CASINO DEAL!






    Seaver, Trettel: Protect Milford from casino
    Posted Nov 16, 2013



    We urge all Milford residents to consider the substantial price we will pay if we allow a casino to be built in the midst of our residential community.

    A casino will double our entire population almost daily, halting traffic on our local roads and highways. Traffic snarls will not only delay our daily drives to the grocery store, but also our commutes to work and home on I-495 when traffic backs up all the way past the Mass Pike.

    Property values all over town will likely drop. Even the chairman of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission thinks so.

    Water is a precious natural resource, and Milford has a limited supply. Foxwoods would take a substantial portion of our reserve.

    Casinos generate much more crime than anyone cares to admit. Imagine seven million more people in Milford each year! DUIs, embezzlement, and prostitution will be a guaranteed new fact of life. No amount of casino revenue could be worth having a loved one critically injured by a driver who drank too much at the casino.

    The casino payments are simply a combination of taxes, which every business pays, and mitigation.

    Mitigation is the money we are being promised in exchange for the damages a casino will inflict on our quality of life by creating daily headaches on our roads, lowering our home values, overburdening our schools and hospital, compromising our water supply, and most importantly, putting our families at risk.

    Let us stand together to protect ourselves, our kids, and our grandkids. Every vote will count in this critical referendum. Please join us at the polls on Nov. 19 and vote NO!

    JOHN SEAVER
    STEVE TRETTEL
    Milford


    Read more: http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/opinions/letters_to_the_editor/x915445002/Seaver-Trettel-Protect-Milford-from-casino#ixzz2kwzhaQAZ
    Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Non-Commercial
    Follow us: @metrowestdaily on Twitter | MetroWestDailyNews on Facebook

    Saturday, November 16, 2013

    Another screwy deal by Gam[bl]ing Commission?

    Let me get this clear....

    David Nunes has been salivating to invade Milford for years....

    sucks in Foxwoods desperate for $$$.....

    no financing...

    on the EVE of a Milford vote the Gambling Commission issues PROVISIONAL approval....

    to a PENN NATIONAL SPIN-OFF......?



    Massachusetts Grants Provisional OK to Foxwoods-Backed Casino

    Friday, November 15, 2013

    In Milford, Foxwoods should fold

    There's on so much lipstick you can put on a pig....it's still a pig!




    Foxwoods, David Nunes and Milford Officials who supported this fiasco should be ashamed!

    Foxwoods has made a mockery of the project and process.
    No water! Oops! Wetlands! Oops! No financing! What are a few felons in our midst?

    Disgraceful!






    Friday, November 15, 2013

    In Milford, Foxwoods should fold


    The choice to embrace or reject any specific gaming proposal rests with the host community that will be most affected by it, whether that's for richer, poorer, or some combination of the two. But this week's surprising news that the applicant for a Milford casino, Crossroads Massachusetts LLC, has not yet identified an equity owner for 55 percent of the project, should give voters serious pause.

    The revelation emerged during a hearing in Boston held by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, and comes just days before Milford voters are slated to decide whether to give the go-ahead to the project, which would be operated by Foxwoods.

    Voters should reject the proposed host community agreement at the polls next Tuesday.

    We have taken a very dim view of expanded gaming in Massachusetts, believing that gambling is a regressive form of economic development for most communities, with social costs that far outweigh any economic benefits.

    But even if the proposal in Milford had nothing to do with gambling, it fails to meet the basic standards for financing, transparency and business reputation that should characterize any major economic development

    In their background review of the applicant, state gaming officials identified concerns about financing, the suitability of David Nunes, the principal organizer of Crossroads Massachusetts LLC, and the possible role of current or former officials with the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Council of Connecticut, three of whom have been convicted of crimes.

    For now, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission considers the Foxwoods proposal for Milford incomplete, in light of the failure to secure a majority equity stakeholder.

    While the proponents insisted Wednesday that could change soon, there are simply too many unanswered questions and risks to Milford and surrounding communities for voters to say yes to this plan.

    By this point in the process, a serious proposal would have lined up full funding, exhibited transparency in all its business operations, and inspired confidence in all observers that it could fulfill its promises should it be granted a license.

    We don't see those conditions in place. If Foxwoods Massachusetts isn't willing to fold its hand, voters should end the game on Tuesday.

    http://www.telegram.com/article/20131115/NEWS/311159953/0