Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Plainrdige. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Plainrdige. Show all posts

Friday, June 13, 2014

Massachusetts: Genuflecting!




Just two months after they extended the deadline for casino applicants in Southeastern Massachusetts, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission is considering opening the region to new bidders and extending the deadline again, possibly until mid-March.

At a meeting Thursday, the commission put off making a decision for two weeks on the area known as Region C, to solicit public comment and guidance from the agency's legal advisers.
The deadline for Phase 2 applications in Region C was originally July 23, which would have required referendum votes by mid-May in cities where the casinos are proposed. In April, the deadline was extended to Sept. 23. That meant commercial applicants currently seeking the Region C license — KG Urban Enterprises and Foxwoods — would need a host community agreement in place by July 14 and then would have until the September date to file the completed Phase 2 application.

Now the Gaming Commission is considering pushing that September deadline forward, possibly another six months, in an attempt to keep potential investors interested in Southeastern Massachusetts.

KG Urban, which is proposing a New Bedford waterfront casino and was at one time the lone bidder in the region, was quick to reject the idea of opening up the application process to new companies.

"KG Urban strongly opposes opening the Southeast Region C to applicants that made no commitment to the region, or the commonwealth, prior to commission's deadline last September. We will submit detailed comments to the Gaming Commission," said Andy Paven, a spokesman for the company seeking a New Bedford waterfront casino.

Foxwoods, which wants to build in Fall River, did not return a call seeking comment.

The commission is poised to officially award the state's first full-fledged casino license today to MGM Resorts for an $800 million project in Springfield. MGM will be allowed to delay paying the $85 million license fee because of the effort underway to repeal the state's casino law through a possible referendum on the November ballot.

Extending the Region C deadline to March would allow the loser in the Greater Boston license sweepstakes — Wynn Resorts or Mohegan Sun — to enter the Southeastern Massachusetts market, commission 
Chairman Stephen Crosby said.

But Crosby said he doesn't think extending the deadline will make much difference in attracting Region C bidders.

"I don't think that's what the problem here is," he said.

The problems are well-documented. The looming presence of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, which has proposed a $500 million Indian casino in Taunton, is one of them.

Though the tribe does not yet have federal approval and its application remains in legal limbo with the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs, it does have a compact with the state to make payments in lieu of taxes at a rate of 17 percent of gross gambling revenue, so long as there is no direct competition from a commercial casino in the region. If there is a state-licensed competitor, the tribe's payments would drop to zero and the commercial company would be at a competitive disadvantage.

Paula Gates, a spokeswoman for the tribe, said the Mashpee land application remains under review by the bureau.

"The tribe is encouraged at the pace things are moving along," Gates said.

Even without the possible tribal casino, Region C is a highly competitive market. The state's lone slot parlor would be just over the border into Region B in Plainville, there are two gambling facilities in nearby Rhode Island, and there are two Indian casinos in Connecticut.

For most of the year, KG Urban was the lone bidder in Region C. Once Foxwoods lost a referendum vote to build a casino in Milford, the Connecticut casino operator turned its attention to Fall River and New Bedford with the blessing of the Gaming Commission.

Kenneth Fiola, executive vice president of Fall River's Office of Economic Development, said his city would welcome a deadline extension, in part, because the state's Supreme Judicial Court has not yet decided whether a referendum question to repeal the casino law can go on the November ballot.

"The real 800-pound gorilla in the room is the uncertainty of what's going to happen with SJC," Fiola said referring to the potential ballot question.

Companies are reluctant to spend the money on marketing campaigns to win local support at the ballot box because of the uncertainty, he said. The popular vote has to be held 60 to 90 days after a host community agreement is approved by the City Council, he said.

"We have no choice but to support a deadline extension," Fiola said.

A spokesman for New Bedford Mayor Jon Mitchell issued a statement saying that city also supports the extension of the deadline until after a potential November referendum.

"As acknowledged previously, the city has had productive discussions with casino interests and believes a November deadline would provide sufficient opportunity to bring forward any potential proposals," the statement said.

While Commissioner Enrique Zuniga of the gaming board suggested the commission could let the current deadlines play out and extend the deadline if only one of the two companies meets it, Crosby said that would be unfair to the company and city that rushed to get a deal done.

"I'm really uncomfortable with the idea of letting someone come in by the 14th and then extending the deadline," Crosby said.

Whatever the commission decides, it needs to strike a balance and not allow the southeastern part of the state to fall too far behind the other two regions, said John Ziemba, the commission's ombudsman.

"Region C falling behind is not the problem," Crosby said. "It's Region C falling off the map completely."


http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20140613/NEWS/406130321/-1/NEWSLETTER100



Sunday, June 8, 2014

Gambling regulators consider awarding Massachusetts' 1st casino license to MGM Springfield



Gambling regulators consider awarding Massachusetts' 1st casino license to MGM Springfield

BOSTON — MGM Resorts International is nearing a final ruling on its bid to become Massachusetts' first licensed casino operator, with a proposed $800 million project in Springfield.

Starting Tuesday, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission will hold a series of meetings in Springfield and Boston leading up to a Friday vote in Springfield on who receives the western region casino license.

MGM, which owns the Mirage, Bellagio, MGM Grand and other casinos, is the lone operator standing in a once-crowded field.

Plans by Penn National Gaming and Ameristar Casinos never went before Springfield voters, while proposals by Mohegan Sun in Palmer and Hard Rock International in West Springfield were defeated in local referendums.

MGM's plan for a casino, hotel, shopping and entertainment complex on 14 1/2 acres straddling the city's downtown and South End neighborhood was approved by Springfield voters last July.

Still, commission members have been reluctant to describe MGM as a shoe-in, noting the panel has reserved the right to not issue a license now or to impose stipulations or conditions on issuing the license.

Stephen Crosby, chairman of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, said recently he doesn't expect the five-member commission will need all four days to make its decision. Each commission member is expected to present findings on one of five areas of MGM's 236-page application that they have been tasked to review.

Crosby, for example, will give an overview of the proposal, including how it "manifests an appreciation" for the Massachusetts "brand," ''leverages Massachusetts' existing assets" and enhances the state's existing tourism and leisure venues, according to the commission's evaluation guidelines.

Other commissioners will look at the project's finances, economic impacts, building and site design and impacts on local traffic patterns, gambling addiction and the state lottery.

One open question is whether the commission will take up MGM's request to delay formal "awarding" of the license at least until early July, when the state Supreme Judicial Court decides whether a voter referendum to repeal the casino law outright should be allowed on the November ballot.

Michael Mathis, CEO of MGM Springfield, has said the Las Vegas-based casino giant is concerned about some $200 million in fees and payments that effectively come due if it is awarded the license.

Those payments could be lost if the casino law is ultimately repealed.

Crosby and other commissioners have declined to say whether they support the delay. But MGM Springfield spokeswoman Carole Brennan says the casino is hopeful.

"The license isn't going to be awarded, we hope. We will be designated the licensee," she said.

The western region casino license is one of three authorized under the 2011 casino law.

In the eastern region, Mohegan Sun is proposing a more than $1 billion casino on the Revere side of the Suffolk Downs horse racing track, and Wynn Resorts has proposed a $1.6 billion casino on a former chemical plant in Everett. The commission anticipates awarding that license by the end of August, at the earliest.

In the southeastern region, Foxwoods and other casino operators have expressed interest, but no proposal has yet been put before local voters. The commission will likely not award that license until February.

The commission has already awarded the state's sole slot parlor license to Penn National Gaming. That slot facility, located at the Plainridge harness racing track in Plainville, is expected to open by June 2015.


http://www.dailyjournal.net/view/story/965694f1596149fbb267b07ae2b985a9/MA--Massachusetts-Casino-Springfield/


Friday, May 30, 2014

First casino license could be awarded in mid-June


First casino license could be awarded in mid-June

Massachusetts Gaming Commission members at a hearing in February.Credit: The Boston Globe

(AP) — Massachusetts’ first license for a Las Vegas-style casino could be awarded as soon as mid-June, following four straight days of meetings by state gambling regulators in Boston and Springfield.

The Massachusetts Gaming Commission laid out the anticipated timeline at its meeting Thursday. The commission will be in Springfield June 10 and 11; June 12 in Boston and June 13 in Springfield, where the commission aims to approve the award.

    
The commission’s choices are limited: MGM Resorts International’s plan for an $800 million casino on nearly 15 acres straddling Springfield’s downtown and South End neighborhood is the lone project still in contention for the license, which is reserved for the state’s western region. But commission members have been reluctant to rule out the possibility of not issuing an award at this time.
 
Voters in Massachusetts’ third-largest city overwhelmingly approved the MGM project last July as competing plans fell by the wayside. City and business leaders see the project — easily the largest economic development project Springfield has seen in a generation — as a chance to revive the former industrial center, which has among the highest jobless rates in the state.
 
Commissioners said Thursday they want to give as much time as possible to weigh information provided by staff and the casino about the project, as well as discuss any conditions or stipulations they might want to include in issuing the award.
 
‘‘Look, this is a major project for a major section of the city with major implications,’’
Commissioner James McHugh said. ‘‘We are taking this very seriously, even though there is only one applicant.’’
 
This final phase in the more than two-year long licensing process will involve public presentations by each of the five commissioners. Each has been tasked to examine a specific aspect of the casino application. Among those: the project’s finances and revenue projections, economic development potential, site design, and impacts to traffic and local services.
 
McHugh added that the commission could ask MGM officials to elaborate or clarify information discussed during the deliberations. No formal testimony would be taken from the public, however, because the commission held hearings on the proposal earlier this year in Springfield.
 
One open question is whether the commission accepts MGM’s request for a delay in the $85 million licensing fee that comes due if it is awarded the license. The Las Vegas-based casino giant is concerned about the potential for an outright repeal of the state’s casino law.
 
The state’s highest court is expected to rule by July on whether or not a voter referendum to repeal the state’s 2011 casino law should be allowed on the November ballot. That law authorized the commission to award at least three regional casino licenses — western, eastern and southeastern — and one slot parlor license, which has already been awarded to Penn National Gaming for a project at the Plainridge harness racing track in Plainville.
 
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2014/05/29/state-first-casino-license-awarded-june/kP75Kx8DlwuIvL9IyYl8WJ/story.html
 

Friday, February 28, 2014

Gaming board picks first winner: Plainville




Gaming board picks first winner: Plainville

Top Photo


By
 
The Massachusetts Gaming Commission has awarded the state's first and only slots license to the Plainridge Racecourse in Plainville, just minutes from the Rhode Island border.
 
The license, which will go to Penn National Gaming, is within 25 miles of the casino proposed by the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe in East Taunton. But, as outlined in the compact with Gov. Deval Patrick, the tribe will not get any financial breaks for competing with Plainridge. The slots parlor will be in Region B, while the tribe is trying to build in Region C. If the facilities were in the same region, the tribe could pay a lower percentage of its gaming revenue to the state.
 
The vote for Plainridge was 3-2 with commission Chairman Stephen Crosby and commissioner James McHugh, the two dissenting votes, favoring a Leominster site.
 
The license award comes two years and three months after the state legalized casinos and nearly two years after the commission began the process of regulating and licensing gambling in the Bay State.
Penn National officials have until this morning to accept a laundry list of conditions that goes along with the license award. If the company agrees, the commission will take one final vote this morning.
 
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council Chairman Cedric Cromwell declined to comment through Paula Gates, a representative of the tribe's public relations firm.
 
Cromwell has said in the past that he doesn't believe a nearby slots parlor will affect the tribe's casino operation and, in fact, a marketing study prepared for the gaming commission suggests that a Taunton casino will take business away from the slot facility.
 
Commissioners made a point Thursday of saying that the inclusion of the Taunton site in marketing projections is not a prediction that the tribe will clear its arduous federal hurdles. KG Urban Enterprises is already seeking a commercial license in Region C in New Bedford and Foxwoods is kicking the tires on a possible Fall River site.
 
"We congratulate Plainridge," Andy Paven, a spokesman for KG Urban, said Thursday afternoon.
 
"We're focused on our own project and were always aware of this possibility."
 
Clyde Barrow, a gambling expert with the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth's Center for Policy Analysis, said the Plainville site is a smart pick to recapture some of the hundreds of millions being spent out of state each year at Twin River Casino in Rhode Island and two Indian casinos in Connecticut.
 
"Plainville is in the best position to intercept traffic coming from central and Southeastern Massachusetts," he said.
 
The slot parlor isn't likely to hurt full-scale casinos proposed in the region because it's a different market for convenience gamblers, Barrow said.
 
The slot parlor is at a competitive disadvantage because it will pay 49 percent of its gross gambling revenues to the state in taxes. A Wampanoag casino would most likely pay 17 percent under the state compact and a commercial casino in the region would be taxed 25 percent.
 
Parx, which owns one of the most successful casinos in Pennsylvania, and Cordish Companies, a Maryland-based casino operator that was highly praised by commissioners, both lost out on bids Thursday. But, they could now turn their sights to the Southeastern Massachusetts license.
 
KG Urban is still seeking a gambling investor and the commission has said any license loser is welcome to find land in Region C and come back with a new pitch.
 
"That's absolutely a possibility," Barrow said.
 
Paven declined comment on whether KG Urban planned to speak with either company.
 
In winning the slots license, Penn National Gaming was given high marks for its innovative storm water system, its experience with 28 facilities across the country and its commitment to continue harness racing at the Plainridge Racecourse.
 
But it was horse racing and preserving track jobs that tipped the scales for the majority of commissioners.
 
"It's better to have a dollar on hand today than tomorrow. Better to have a job today than tomorrow," commissioner Enrique Zuniga said.
 
A slot parlor proposed in Leominster by the Cordish Companies was a close second to Plainville with Crosby and McHugh lobbying hard for the project because it would give a down-on-its-luck region an economic boost.
 
Cordish was given high marks for its plans to tie into the medical devices industry in central Massachusetts and because it would serve gamblers that would otherwise have to travel nearly an hour to other Bay State casinos.
 
"I have a tiny bit of a sick feeling that we're missing an opportunity for an important part of the state that really could have been something unique and special," Crosby said.
 
 
 

Friday, August 23, 2013

Money from slots has done nothing to improve horse racing


Here's some more goodness dispelling the myth that slots are the only way to save racing. In reality, all they do is enrich casino/track owners. Eventually, state governments get sick of subsidizing millionaire horse owners and track owners, and they begin to cut back on those subsidies.

NJ Gov. Chris Christie: “I am no longer going to permit millionaire horsemen to take money ... from the taxpayers of the state to fund their industry.”

Ontario Education Minister Laurel Broten: “We simply can’t afford to support ... horse racing subsidies. ... when the ... money could get better health care for our seniors and full-day kindergarten for our 4- and 5-year-olds.”

Share with your neighbors who would vote yes to save jobs at the track or keep horse racing going.
 
 
Money from slots has done nothing to improve horse racing
 
At a time when the horse racing business has suffered a serious decline, one segment of the sport is enjoying a bonanza. These are great times for horsemen in states where purses are subsidized by revenue from slot machines.

Owners and trainers at Parx — the former Philadelphia Park— must think that they have died and gone to heaven when they run a bottom-level $5,000 claimer in a race with a $25,000 purse — plus a bonus if the animal was bred in Pennsylvania. Horsemen at minor league tracks such as Charles Town (W. Va.), Presque Isle Downs (Pa.) and Zia Park (N.M.) regularly compete for big-league purses because of slot money.

These windfalls exist because many states, when they legalized slots, opted to install them in racetracks and decided to aid the sport by earmarking a certain percentage of revenues for purses and breeder awards. But what the state gives, the state can take away, and many are taking a fresh look at their largesse to the horse business:
●In Pennsylvania, Gov. Tom Corbett has proposed cutting $72 million of subsidies to horse racing and breeding to pay for other agricultural projects.

●In Ontario, the provincial government has proposed ending all slots payments to the horse racing industry as of 2013.

●In Indiana, the state’s inspector general advocated slashing the subsidy for horse racing.

●In New Jersey, Gov. Chris Christie ended state support of racing and blasted leaders of the sport for “extorting the taxpayers for millions of dollars in subsidies to their industry.”

Horsemen have reacted with shock and outrage to such proposals, but they should have seen these haymakers coming. Many state governments are under severe financial pressure and are struggling to maintain basic services for their citizens. As politicians look for sources of revenue, they can’t ignore the millions of dollars now flowing into horse racing, and they can readily frame populist arguments that the money is being misallocated.

Christie said: “I am no longer going to permit millionaire horsemen to take money . . . from the taxpayers of the state to fund their industry.” In Ontario, Education Minister Laurel Broten sent out a news release declaring, “We simply can’t afford to support . . . horse racing subsidies. . . . when the . . . money could get better health care for our seniors and full-day kindergarten for our 4- and 5-year-olds.”

In most places, the racing/slot machine relationships developed along similar lines. In some cases, a racetrack couldn’t survive on its own merits, but it was such an important part of its community that the public supported legalizing slots to keep it alive. (This was the case at Charles Town.)
In others, proposals for legalized slots faced a lot of not-in-my-backyard opposition, and the perfect answer was to put the slots in an existing gambling facility — a racetrack. The track, of course, got a percentage of the profits for running the operation. The rationale for allotting money to purses and breeders’ awards (rather than, say, health care for seniors) was to revive the sport by improving the product and attracting more fans.
But every racing fan knows what happened instead. When slots were legalized, the machines proved to be so lucrative many track owners lost interest in the sport and viewed it as a nuisance. They made no effort to improve the game or attract new fans; slot players are more profitable customers.
The day-to-day racing at tracks such as Philadelphia Park and Delaware Park is just about as dreary as it was before slots inflated the purses. One track that has made the most of slot money is Woodbine, in Toronto, which offers some of the best daily cards on the continent and uses its resources to promote the sport and to create new horseplayers. But Woodbine is a rarity.
More often, slot money props up tracks that have virtually no fan base and couldn’t exist on their own merits. This is true of most harness and dog tracks, and some thoroughbred operations — such as Presque Isle Downs. Two previous racetracks in Erie, Pa., went broke from lack of support. Presque Isle was built when slots were legalized in the state, and it had to be a racetrack to get the machines, but its racing business is as pitiful as that of its predecessors. The track’s average attendance last season was 705, and those customers bet an average of $35,000 per day on the live product. Yet Presque Isle pays huge purses — more than $200,000 a day.
While the money has benefited owners, trainers and Pennsylvania breeders, it has done nothing to popularize or improve horse racing. On the contrary, it has hurt the sport in some ways. At a time when almost every track is suffering from a shortage of thoroughbreds, the horses who go to Erie could be running at viable tracks, helping them to offer a better product, instead of racing in a place where almost nobody watches them.
Too many people in the thoroughbred industry are content with the status quo. In the crowded mid-Atlantic region, racetracks should agree to pare down their schedules, offering fewer races with larger fields that fans want to bet. But horsemen habitually resist such cutbacks, and most tracks continue to lose fans.
However, the status quo is unsustainable because more and more politicians will be asking: Why should we subsidize a sport that so few people care about? Why should we help an industry that won’t help itself? And thoroughbred racing can offer no good responses to these questions.
For Andrew Beyer’s previous columns, go to washingtonpost.com/beyer.

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-03-19/sports/35448728_1_slot-money-horsemen-purses