More amendments added to casino bill

More amendments added to casino bill
By Krista Kano/DAILY NEWS CORRESPONDENT
The MetroWest Daily News


BOSTON — Three state senators from MetroWest have filed a pile of amendments to a bill that would allow three casinos and a slots parlor in the state, with the legislation expected on the Senate floor Monday.

Sen. Karen Spilka, D-Ashland, and Sen. James Eldridge, D-Acton, filed amendments that would increase how much say nearby cities and towns would have in planned casinos.

Sen. Susan Fargo, D-Lincoln, filed two amendments that would require casinos to hire Massachusetts residents exclusively.

"It's critical that residents across the state understand this casino bill," Spilka said yesterday. "I feel that there are some protections in the bill, but I would like to strengthen those safeholds."

Spilka filed 11 amendments that would increase community participation by including the host city or town, surrounding communities and "substantially impacted" communities, such as those with a major route running through them to a casino site.

Spilka's amendments would give such towns and cities a voice in a community mitigation commission, which would work directly with a gaming commission to determine community support or opposition to a planned casino.

The amendments would also give an automatic voice to cities and towns within a three-mile radius of a casino, while Eldridge's amendment increases that radius to five miles.

"That speaks to the fact that there are significant costs when a casino comes to a region - increased traffic," he said. "We want people to have an increased say in whether or not a casino comes to that region."

Eldridge also filed an amendment that would prohibit legislators from working for a casino within five years of leaving office.

"I think it's very important that when you are bringing an industry like casinos to a state, that it's being done for the right reasons," he said. "I wouldn't want the casino industry to be a reason for legislators to leave office and then get jobs there."

Another Eldridge amendment would require casinos to provide health insurance to their employees. Under Massachusetts law, any business that does not provide health insurance faces a $285 fine per employee. Eldridge is concerned that casinos would accept the fine and not provide insurance.

Fargo was more concerned with who the casinos would hire.

"Casino employees in other states are being laid off, and if they hear about job opportunities here in Massachusetts, they'll come here and try to get those jobs," she said. "The whole point of the casinos, according to its proponents, is to create jobs. We'd like to see those jobs reserved for Massachusetts residents."

In Memorium .....

On this truly sad day when vested interests and lobbyists were allowed to prevail and the public and wisdom was silenced, there are many who shone their integrity and courage and stood to speak the truth.

Here are but a few of the heroes and heroines --



... Rep. Ruth Balser, who described deep opposition to the proposal.

"What we're deciding today is about the introduction of slot machines into Massachusetts," she said, before reading from expert testimony that described modern slot machines as devices intended to encourage gamblers to "play to extinction." "If we actually look at what these [slot machine] algorithms are doing, it's a kind of high-tech version of weighting the deck or loading the dice, which no self-respecting casinos would ever think of doing."


Rep. Matthew Patrick, a vehement gambling critic who said he would attempt to delay the House's attempt to pass a gambling proposal, took the House podium shortly before 1 p.m. invoking the prayer offered by the House's chaplain at the start of Saturday's session.

"Would Christ even conceive of a bill that would bring such extreme pain and suffering to so many people?" he said. "In gambling, someone has to lose. That's an unfortunate fact."


Rep. Carl Sciortino (D-Medford), a gambling critic, said he read the compromise gambling bill until 1 a.m. and said it was "a challenge" to understand. He questioned whether his colleagues fully understood the bill they are preparing to vote on. Taking the microphone shortly after 1:30 p.m., Rep. Denise Provost said she sees no silver lining to the proposal, just "pure cloud."

Sen. Susan Tucker, D-Andover, a staunch gambling opponent, said the casinos and racinos will be a "total economic loser for Massachusetts."

Sen. Susan Fargo, D-Lincoln, another expanded gambling opponent, predicted the industry will only grow larger and the state will cater to any new demands of the gambling industry.

"You can't regulate these interests," she said. "They will talk their way out of everything."


Governor, Will you do the right thing?