- Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, who supported an unsuccessful 2014 ballot question repealing the casino law, said she hoped the Gaming Commission would take the latest development as an opportunity to review the prudence of licensing another casino in southeastern Massachusetts.
- Posted Jul. 23, 2015
STATE HOUSE, BOSTON - The decision by prospective developers to abandon plans for a resort casino on the New Bedford waterfront brings into "sharp focus" the threat of oversaturating the gambling market in Massachusetts with a third casino, Attorney General Maura Healey told the News Service on Thursday.
KG Urban wrote a letter to the Gaming Commission on Wednesday announcing that it would drop its bid to build a casino in New Bedford, despite voters in that city overwhelmingly approving the concept of a casino. The developers cited their inability to put together financing for the project, as well as the "possibility of competition from a nearby Indian casino which would pay no taxes or other compensation to the Commonwealth."
Healey, who supported an unsuccessful 2014 ballot question repealing the casino law, said she hoped the Gaming Commission would take the latest development as an opportunity to review the prudence of licensing another casino in southeastern Massachusetts.
"I think the Gaming Commission has to take a hard look at this. What we see in New Bedford is a reflection of some of the concerns that have been expressed already about market saturation and what's happening in that region and it's a really important issue and I hope the Gaming Commission take this opportunity to task a hard look at what is happening in the region," Healey said.
With the New Bedford developers out of the competition for a license, the Gaming Commission is left with one commercial proposal in the region - Mass Gaming & Entertainment's plan to build a casino in Brockton. Commissioners had expressed their desire to have at least two bids to create competition for the license, and planned to discuss KG Urban's withdrawal at a meeting Thursday.
The Mashpee Wampanoag has plans for a casino in Taunton, but that project has stalled as the tribe seeks federal approval for land to be taken into trust as native tribal lands. If it wins federal approval, the tribe could build a casino without a license from the commission.
"You don't want to have a situation where casinos operate and fail. That's not going to be good for taxpayers, it's not going to be good for the state and it's certainly not going to be good for the communities surrounding the places where the casinos are going to operate," Healey said.
Plainridge Park Casino, which won the state's sole slot parlor license, has begun operations in southeastern Massachusetts and out-of-state gaming venues in Rhode Island and Connecticut compete for customers from Massachusetts.
- http://raynham.wickedlocal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20150723%2FNEWS%2F150728219
Showing posts with label New Bedford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Bedford. Show all posts
Saturday, July 25, 2015
AG warns gambling regulators about Southeast MA market 'oversaturation'
Thursday, July 23, 2015
New Bedford casino developer withdraws bid
New Bedford casino developer withdraws bid
The proposal to build a $650 million casino on the New Bedford waterfront is dead, falling victim to a lack of financing amid concerns about the viability of large gaming resort in Southeastern Massachusetts.
The abrupt withdrawal of KG Urban, the New York-based developer that had proposed a glass-walled complex with panoramic views of the historic harbor, is the latest setback in the state’s long-term strategy to lure gamblers back from casinos in Rhode Island and Connecticut.
In its letter to the state Gaming Commission, KG Urban said investors were not convinced that the venture would work in an increasingly competitive environment.
“As you can well imagine, we deeply regret reaching this conclusion,” KG Urban, which spent more than $10 million in an eight-year quest for the casino, wrote in a four-paragraph letter to the commission dated Wednesday.
Among its concerns, the company cited a plan being developed by the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe to open a casino in Taunton, within 25 miles of the site in New Bedford. A state-licensed New Bedford casino would be at a huge disadvantage, because as a federally recognized tribe, the Mashpee would pay no taxes, while the New Bedford facility would face a 25 percent tax.
KG Urban’s abrupt withdrawal comes at a time of growing uncertainty over plans for the two other resort casinos authorized under the state’s 2011 casino law. Under current forecasts, those casinos, originally expected to open in 2016, won’t go on line until at least 2018, meaning the state already faces about two years of delay in realizing forecasts of thousands of new jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars in new revenue.
The state officially entered the casino era last month with the opening of Plainridge Park Casino in Plainville, but that facility is much smaller than the resort casinos, which are to include hotels, planned for Springfield and Everett.
MGM Resorts, which is developing the casino in Springfield, recently announced a one-year delay caused by nearby highway construction, while Wynn Resorts’ plans for a casino in Everett are hung up in court, facing an aggressive legal challenge from Boston Mayor Martin J. Walsh.
Even before KG Urban’s withdrawal, some Gaming Commission members had expressed skepticism over a casino in Southeastern Massachusetts because of the well-established competition in Rhode Island and Connecticut.
“It’s the most challenging region because it is less populated and has less market potential,” Commissioner Enrique Zuniga said during a commission meeting in March.
Now the only bidder for a Southeastern Massachusetts casino is a partnership of Rush Street Gaming, which operates four casinos in the Midwest, and George Carney, the longtime owner of Raynham Park race track. The group wants to build a $650 million casino on the site of the Brockton Fairgrounds, which Carney owns.
Commission chairman Stephen P. Crosby has often stated his intention to award the license only after competition between at least two bidders.
A spokeswoman for the commission declined to comment on Wednesday, but said members will discuss KG Urban’s decision at a meeting already scheduled for Thursday.
The withdrawal came as a bitter blow to New Bedford Mayor Jon Mitchell, who had hoped a casino would spur economic development in a city long plagued by high unemployment. In March, Mitchell delivered an impassioned appeal to the commission, pledging full support for a casino to be located on a former power plant site on Cannon Street.
“KG Urban’s decision to abandon the Cannon Street project is an extreme disappointment and a great shock,” Mitchell said in a statement Wednesday.
Mitchell said he and city residents had been led to believe by the developers that financing had been secured. In a June 23 referendum, New Bedford voters approved hosting the casino by a whopping 73 percent to 27 percent margin.
“City leadership and the people of New Bedford relied on these assurances in casting their enthusiastic support for the project,” Mitchell said. “We have been united as a community and have done everything possible to support” the KG casino proposal, “so city residents and its leadership are all understandably upset.”
When — and whether — the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe will get approval from the US Bureau of Indian Affairs for a casino is a matter of intense speculation. The tribe’s application is subject to a complex body of federal law.
“We’ve always seen our project as an economic boon for Southeastern Massachusetts,” Cedric Cromwell, the Tribal Council chairman, said in a statement after learning of KG Urban’s withdrawal. “As our plans in Taunton move ahead, the economic benefits will become more apparent to everyone in the region, including the people of New Bedford.”
Mass Gaming & Entertainment, the developers proposing a Brockton casino, also released a statement pledging to remain in the hunt for a license.
“Our project will provide the Commonwealth with over $100 million a year in tax revenue once a resort casino is built in Brockton as well as $10 [million] to $12 million” to the city annually, the group said.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/07/22/new-bedford-casino-developer-withdraws-proposal-letter-says/DqaLeTmImEHLfhXigdQBgJ/story.html
Sunday, July 12, 2015
Towns neighboring New Bedford all express interest in compensation for casino impacts
Towns neighboring New Bedford all express interest in compensation for casino impacts
Fairhaven, Dartmouth, Acushnet, Freetown, others could seek money for increased traffic, class sizes, use of public services, and more, if negotiations unfold with New Bedford developer
By Mike Lawrence
mlawrence@s-t.com
mlawrence@s-t.com
Posted Jul. 11, 2015 at 10:01 PM
NEW BEDFORD — The use of casino dollars for costs associated with upgrading the Howland Road bridge from Fairhaven into New Bedford, where the road becomes Coggeshall Street, is one of many topics that could be on the table in coming weeks, as SouthCoast towns consider potential impacts from the $650 million casino project proposed for New Bedford’s waterfront.
“We’re just at the starting point of having discussions with surrounding towns,” Fairhaven executive secretary Jeffrey Osuch said Thursday. “There will be issues ranging from traffic concerns to housing concerns to potential addiction concerns.”
Less than a month after New Bedford residents gave a landslide show of support for a waterfront casino — with 73 percent of voters in favor June 23 — Fairhaven, Dartmouth, Acushnet and Freetown are all exploring potential casino impacts in their communities and, in varying degrees, the potential for financial compensation.
“Several of the towns have contacted us and asked us to weigh in on the impacts,” said Steve Smith, who served as executive director of the Southeastern Regional Planning and Economic Development District, or SRPEDD, for more than 30 years before retiring June 30.
Smith, who was in the office Wednesday in his new capacity as a part-time consultant, said SRPEDD has previously evaluated impacts for communities near other Massachusetts casino proposals.
“We played that role in the case of the Raynham application,” Smith said, referring to the Taunton-area town’s unsuccessful application for the state’s single slots parlor license.
SRPEDD also was involved in the slots process, Smith said, by sitting in on meetings between developer Penn National Gaming and communities near Plainville, which won the state's single slots license. Plainridge Park Casino opened June 24.
A similar pre-licensing process now is unfolding in SouthCoast.
“I’ve had both Acushnet and Freetown reach out to me for assistance,” Smith said. He added that SRPEDD staff had heard from Dartmouth and Fairhaven officials, as well.
New York-based developer KG Urban Enterprises and New Bedford are competing with developer Mass Gaming & Entertainment, which is proposing a $650 million casino project on a Brockton Fairgrounds site, for the sole commercial casino license the Massachusetts Gaming Commission can allocate in southeastern Massachusetts.
Smith said whether to involve SRPEDD in the mitigation process for communities near New Bedford is up to KG Urban. State gaming law allows regional planning authorities to facilitate impact assessments for casino agreements.
“So far, there’s been no contact in that regard,” Smith said Wednesday.
Osuch said Thursday that KG Urban had not yet contacted Fairhaven, either. Dartmouth Town Administrator David Cressman said the same.
But Cressman said Gaming Commission representatives had reached out to town officials recently, to make them aware of surrounding community rights under state law.
KG Urban spokesman Andrew Paven commented briefly last week on surrounding community negotiations, saying he didn't think the developer had yet reached out to towns neighboring New Bedford. Those talks could heat up ahead of the Sept. 30 deadline for submitting final application materials to the Gaming Commission.
KG Urban’s negotiations with New Bedford early this year were conducted in a contentious, late-winter flurry aided by deadline extensions from the Gaming Commission. The talks culminated in an 11th-hour host community agreement signed on the morning of March 19, hours before Mayor Jon Mitchell and KG Urban representatives presented the deal at a commission meeting later that day.
The timeline for the next legal front, surrounding community negotiations, became clearer at a Thursday meeting of the Gaming Commission in Boston.
If surrounding community agreements for towns that want to be involved are not included in KG Urban’s final application Sept. 30, those towns would have a window in early October to petition to the Gaming Commission.
The five-member commission then could rule by Nov. 30 on whether those towns would be granted “surrounding community” status. That would then trigger a 30-day negotiation period, through December, in which towns granted that status could negotiate compensation agreements with KG Urban.
“The amount of money they get paid is going to be right at the top of the list,” Smith said, saying traffic, housing, schools and crime also are common issues in surrounding community negotiations.
If towns don’t reach agreements, arbitration could result in January 2016 decisions. Attorney Jonathan Silverstein of Boston-based firm Kopelman & Paige, who represents New Bedford in casino matters, said last week that it would be “baseball-style” arbitration, in which each side makes a best and final offer and an arbitrator chooses one of the two.
Silverstein has represented host and surrounding casino communities across Massachusetts. He’ll represent Acushnet, as well, and is representing several communities surrounding Brockton’s casino proposal: Holbrook, Stoughton and Abington so far.
“Every case is going to be very different,” Silverstein said.
Other MA deals
Cities and towns near casino proposals elsewhere in Massachusetts — successful and not — have sought compensation in recent years for an array of impacts, as the commonwealth’s casino era begins.
The most prominent disputes are unfolding in Boston, where Wynn Resorts’ $1.75 billion Everett casino is facing ongoing litigation on numerous fronts, including emphatic efforts by the City of Boston to revoke the casino’s license, or to be named a host community for the project.
Less-contentious casino deals elsewhere in the state, though, could provide a clearer picture of the kind of negotiations that could lie ahead for SouthCoast towns.
West Springfield, for example, received — via arbitration — a May 2014 agreement that includes a $665,000 up-front payment from MGM Springfield. The payment is expressly for design and permitting costs for the reconstruction of Memorial Avenue in West Springfield. The avenue is a major transportation route to the future MGM Springfield casino.
Silverstein represented West Springfield in its negotiations with MGM. A total of six towns and two cities in the Springfield area reached agreements with the developer. Longmeadow won arbitration, as well, receiving $850,000 up front and 13 annual payments of $275,000 in the April 2014 agreement.
West Springfield’s agreement also includes annual payments, of at least $425,000 a year. At least $50,000 of those payments, annually, will go toward “look-back studies,” which will assess casino impacts and potential talking points for additional compensation in future years.
Funding for such studies is included in many casino agreements across the state, as cities and towns enter the foreign territory of commercial gaming.
“This is new to all of us,” Osuch said.
MGM Springfield is an $800 million project, compared to the $650 million estimate for KG Urban’s Cannon Street Station in New Bedford. West Springfield also has nearly double the population of Fairhaven, and is larger than any town surrounding New Bedford.
But its location across the water from Springfield could create traffic impacts and other concerns comparable to Fairhaven’s, Smith said.
“On the surface, it would seem to be fairly close,” Smith said.
Fairhaven selectmen agreed unanimously Monday to direct town counsel to reach out to surrounding towns and to SRPEDD, to discuss casino impacts. The city also intends to file notices with KG Urban and the state Gaming Commission, Osuch said, indicating the town wishes to receive “surrounding community” status that can lead to compensation.
Fairhaven Town Counsel Thomas Crotty said Monday that he would reach out to Kopelman & Paige for potential representation, meaning Silverstein could wind up negotiating casino deals for most of greater New Bedford.
Crosstown traffic
Osuch said data such as traffic thresholds on Fairhaven intersections and roads, including Howland and the Coggeshall bridge, could be analyzed for potential needs such as signal upgrades, turning lanes and more.
“We don’t have a full understanding of what the actual impacts are, and that’s what we have to do some homework on,” he said.
Smith said assessing regional traffic impacts from a New Bedford casino could be easier than assessing multi-direction impacts in Raynham and Plainville, because here, "there just aren't that many ways to access the site.”
Route 6 would be a major secondary access route, he said, but those renovations — including to the New Bedford-Fairhaven Bridge — would involve the state and largely be outside the purview of a surrounding community agreement.
“It’s not going to be Fairhaven’s ability to fix that bridge,” Smith said. “Fairhaven could certainly make the request, you know, ‘Do something to try to get the state moving on that project,' but it’s really sort of beyond the local jurisdiction.”
Silverstein said monetizing traffic impacts can be difficult, and vary by situation.
"It’s a bit of an art, as opposed to a science,” he said.
Fire and EMS calls
Public services in New Bedford interact significantly with services in neighboring towns, meaning an influx of casino crowds into the city could have affects on outlying areas.
“We’re looking at a 15 percent increase in people who are in the city at any one time,” New Bedford Fire Chief Michael Gomes said, citing potential casino crowds of 12,000 to 15,000 people per day. “If you have people who are transiting from other communities to get here, there certainly is increased risk for services from those communities.
“The risks of auto accidents, medical calls and things of that nature will certainly go up,” he said.
Gomes said about 15 percent of emergency medical service (EMS) calls in New Bedford involve some form of mutual aid, either from private ambulance agencies or surrounding towns.
“I do believe that Acushnet comes into the city about 10 times a month, on average, for ambulance support,” he said.
Mark McGraw, the city’s EMS director, said city dispatchers call for ambulance support from surrounding towns after all four of its private contractors are unavailable.
“Mutual aid is a funny thing,” he said. “Sometimes, within a matter of half an hour, we’ve got everybody and his brother in the city,” while other days are slow.
McGraw said the department has looked at studies from other casino towns to gauge impacts. Other communities saw more traffic accidents, McGraw said, but didn’t see much of an increase on the medical side.
“I don’t think it was all that significant,” McGraw said, referring to overall casino impacts on emergency services in other communities.
Water, sewer services
Ron Labelle, commissioner of the city’s Department of Public Infrastructure, said there’s room for the city to grow in water and wastewater capacity, including in its services to surrounding towns.
A report provided by KG Urban in 2014 estimated that a waterfront casino could use 100,000 to 200,000 gallons of water per day.
Labelle called that amount negligible to city water treatment, which he said is operating only at about half capacity.
The city’s water treatment plant has the ability to produce 45 million gallons of water a day, Labelle said, but is only treating about 18 million gallons a day in high-demand summer months.
“We have tremendous capacity to provide water and wastewater services, so a couple hundred thousand gallons of water is minimal,” he said. “It’s really not that much.”
Labelle said a casino “wouldn’t adversely affect our ability to provide any services to (surrounding towns), water or wastewater.”
The shared services are substantial.
“Dartmouth buys a lot of water from us in the summertime, because their wells can’t handle the summer demand,” he said. “Acushnet buys all of its water from us.”
New Bedford provides Fairhaven with water on an emergency basis, according to Labelle, while the city takes in sewage from Acushnet, Dartmouth and Freetown.
New Bedford sends some of its sewage to Fairhaven, he added.
Clock ticking
Osuch and Cressman said Fairhaven and Dartmouth, respectively, are just beginning to assess potential casino impacts and compensation.
“We’re in the initial stages, we’re starting to look at what other communities have looked at and done,” Cressman said.
Silverstein said he’s seen a variety of situations.
“I’ve negotiated some surrounding community agreements fairly quickly, and others have taken a longer time,” he said.
Silverstein said the time period facing communities surrounding New Bedford should be workable.
“Would I love to have more time? Sure,” Silverstein said. “(But) it certainly isn’t all that unusual.”
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/article/20150711/NEWS/150719846/101061/json
Tuesday, June 16, 2015
Addiction, poverty, crime concerns surround New Bedford casino
Atlantic City is the poster child for all that is wrong with Predatory Gambling!
Great book, list statistics and facts:
Addiction, poverty, crime concerns surround New Bedford casino
Too much KoolAid consumption!NEW BEDFORD — Jamie Casey said he understands the need for jobs a casino could bring to employment-starved New Bedford, and the region. He gets it.
“What transcends jobs is quality of life,” said Casey, who leads a Christian ministry known as the Acts 29 Project in greater New Bedford and is on the pastoral team at Hope Evangelical Community Church in Dartmouth.
He said the ministry “deals a lot with addiction intervention,” through efforts including weekly recovery and “discipleship” meetings. He said while gambling addiction can be harder to track than drug and alcohol addiction, its impacts in SouthCoast are evident.
“Gambling is a major issue. It definitely destroys families and people lose their homes over it,” Casey said.
“Gambling can be very much an addiction for folks and can be very destructive to them as well as their families,” echoed Kathy Spear, area director for High Point Treatment Services, which provides substance abuse and mental health services in southeastern Massachusetts.
“People end up in debt, they need to re-mortgage, marriages end because of the financial stress,” Spear said.
Spear’s colleague, High Point director of clinical services Charles Carroll, said the presence of a casino doesn’t necessarily affect gambling addiction, though.
“All of the research that I found … indicated that there was absolutely no change or increase of gambling in the communities where casinos are available,” Carroll said Wednesday night, when he was a panelist for the casino forum at the Zeiterion Performing Arts Center in downtown New Bedford.
“That said, it doesn’t minimize the impact” casinos can have on communities, Carroll added.
Concerns about gambling addiction, effects on social services and people already close to the poverty line, and crime related to financial stresses have been prominent in SouthCoast casino conversations in recent months.
New Bedford residents will vote June 23 on the $650 million resort casino, hotel and conference center proposal by New York-based developer KG Urban Enterprises. The development is slated for the 43-acre, waterfront site of an abandoned NStar power plant, off MacArthur Drive and Route 18.
A $650 million Brockton proposal is New Bedford’s sole competition for the single resort casino license the state can allocate in southeastern Massachusetts, placing social impacts in the regional spotlight regardless of where a casino ends up.
Casey said the gambling issues he encounters in his ministry vary, but most heavily affect senior citizens and people with physical or mental disabilities. He said he often sees people with gambling problems misspend federal assistance.
“They’re waiting for those checks so they can get in and buy their lottery tickets,” he said. “To a point where they’ll go without food for it.”
Spear said High Point received state grant funding within the past two weeks that, for the first time, will boost the agency’s ability to address gambling addiction.
Spear said High Point has received funding from the substance abuse grant for several years, through the Bureau of Substance Abuse Services under the state Department of Public Health. This was the first year, though, that the bureau included gambling addiction in its request for applications.
“Being an addiction agency, we usually screen for gambling addiction,” Spear said. “It really tends to be, in this area, lottery tickets, scratch tickets, Keno.”
Spear said High Point serves low-income or unemployed people who often aren’t able to travel to a casino outside New Bedford. Placing one here, she said, could worsen local addiction problems.
“It would increase accessibility to different types of gambling,” Spear said.
High Point staff address amount and frequency of gambling when screening new patients, Spear said, but the “major factor is the problems that it’s creating” in their lives.
“Somebody might buy a $2 scratch ticket every day, and it might not create any problems for them,” Spear said. “Someone might buy two $10 tickets, which may then impact their ability to pay their rent or buy food. It might create trouble in a relationship.”
Spear said problems arise when people continue to gamble despite repeated negative consequences, while ignoring long-term impacts of daily habits.
“People aren’t always aware of the smaller problems,” Spear said.
A new state study took a snapshot of gambling across Massachusetts, which is on the verge of a casino boom whether New Bedford is included or not. Plainridge Park Casino, a slots parlor, opens June 24 in Plainville. Casino licenses also have been granted in Springfield and Everett.
About 7.5 percent of Massachusetts adults are at-risk gamblers, according to the state’s Social and Economic Impacts of Gambling in Massachusetts study, released Thursday. About 1.7 percent of adults in the state are problem gamblers, the data indicated.
The study was funded by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and conducted by researchers from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst’s School of Public Health and Health Sciences. Researchers surveyed nearly 10,000 residents from September 2013 to May 2014.
The study is intended to set baseline data for future examination of how gambling is affecting the state, after casinos open.
The study’s primary investigator, Rachel Volberg, gave sobering comments to the Gaming Commission on Thursday.
“As gambling participation increases, socializing with family and friends, and supporting worthy causes, become increasingly less important,” Volberg said.
That statement reflects concerns raised by members of SouthCoast ministries and arts communities, who have expressed opposition to New Bedford’s waterfront casino proposal. The city’s casino bid is supported by Mayor Jon Mitchell, New Bedford City Council, members of the economic development community and others.
Casino supporters have touted the development’s ability to clean up the environmentally contaminated NStar site, at an estimated cost of $50 million, while bringing thousands of jobs to the city and revenue streams including taxes and annual payments to New Bedford of $12.5 million a year.
Casino opponents say the social costs of all that money would be too great.
There is no debate, either way, that gambling revenues are plentiful across the state.
The Massachusetts State Lottery generated nearly $4.9 billion in sales and fees across the state last year, from consumer gambling and spending that’s evident at corner shops, package stores, Keno machines and locations across New Bedford.
About 1 in 20 Mass Lottery players spent more than $5,200 in 2012, according to a 2013 survey by the Massachusetts Council on Compulsive Gambling. The survey questioned more than 1,000 adult respondents in Massachusetts. About 11 percent of those big spenders, identified as probable pathological gamblers, lived in Bristol County.
The study released Thursday adds more data onto the pile. Among 14 states that have conducted gambling studies in the past 11 years, Massachusetts’ 1.7 percent rate of adult problem gamblers was the fourth-highest.
Volberg said the data be invaluable in tracking statewide gambling trends and impacts in years to come.
“We are virtually the only state that has gotten a clean baseline (of problem gambling data) before casinos have become operational in the jurisdiction,” she said.
CRIME QUESTIONS
New Bedford Police Chief David A. Provencher has been looking at his share of data lately, as well. He said he’s read scores of studies about casino-related crime in recent months, and found the effects aren’t as drastic as some might think.
Provencher said that while the biggest argument against casinos is that “as gambling takes root, communities and regions will see an increase in bankruptcy, substance abuse, domestic violence and embezzlement,” that argument isn’t supported by the numbers.
“The evidence suggests, contrary to most of our gut feelings, that statistically it just doesn’t seem to be the case,” Provencher said.
Provencher also was a panelist Wednesday night at the Zeiterion.
“The types of crimes we all expect would come with a casino don’t occur in cities where casinos are established,” he told the crowd.
The 2013 state survey indicated otherwise, though, because of correlating problems frequently tied to gambling addiction.
“More than one half of probable pathological gamblers identified having at least one other problem behavior,” reads the Massachusetts Statewide Gambling Behavior, Opinions and Needs Assessment, released in 2013. “Thirty-one percent have had a drug problem, 24 percent have had an alcohol problem, 17 percent have had a sex addiction problem, 6 percent have had a problem stealing, and 4 percent shoplifting.”
Provencher acknowledged that the simple fact of casino crowds could affect local crime rates.
“Most of the crime rates you’re going to read about are based on population,” he said. “If you assume for the sake of argument that 20,000 people are coming into a casino every day, during that time, your (New Bedford) population is no longer 96,000.”
Problems on the casino site largely will be handled by casino security staff and surveillance cameras, he said. But spillover and regional impacts, should they occur, could be harder to track.
“I think we’ll see an increase in calls for service, because of the size and nature of the clientele,” Provencher said.
New Bedford native and South End resident R. Carleen Cordwell, an activist and entrepreneur who described herself at the Zeiterion forum as a second-generation Cape Verdean American and “the direct descendant of a whaler,” said a casino could change the city’s crime situation for the better.
A properly planned casino “could be the most innovative thing that’s happened in many, many years” in the city, she said, and could reduce crime by addressing a root cause: unemployment.
“You have children with nowhere to go, that [sic] end up criminals,” Cordwell said.
A casino could give young adults from low-income neighborhoods training in high-end service industry jobs, Cordwell said, creating opportunities that currently don’t exist in the city.
“If (a casino) made sure it was conscious of mental health issues and addiction issues … it could change the entire community,” she said.
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/article/20150613/NEWS/150619675/101061
Wednesday, June 10, 2015
Financial terms set for building behind the 50 year old hurricane barrier certified in 2011 by the same US Army Corps of Engineers that certified the New Orleans levies that wiped out all the casinos
New Bedford Casino developer: Financial terms set
The developer behind the New Bedford casino proposal said Tuesday that it had submitted financial terms with its primary investor to state gaming officials, potentially meeting a crucial deadline after months of extensions and clearing a huge hurdle ahead of the city's June 23 vote on the $650 million project.
By Mike Lawrence
mlawrence@s-t.comPosted Jun. 9, 2015 at 1:54 pmUpdated at 5:12 PM
mlawrence@s-t.comPosted Jun. 9, 2015 at 1:54 pmUpdated at 5:12 PM
NEW BEDFORD — The developer behind the New Bedford casino proposal said Tuesday that it had submitted financial terms with its primary investor to state gaming officials, potentially meeting a crucial deadline after months of extensions and clearing a huge hurdle ahead of the city’s June 23 vote on the $650 million project.
"KG Urban Enterprises has submitted a signed term sheet between it and GLPI to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission," KG Urban spokesman Andrew Paven wrote in an email.
Pennsylvania-based Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc. is KG Urban's primary financial backer for the casino, hotel and conference center development, proposed for New Bedford's waterfront on the MacArthur Drive site of an abandoned NStar power plant.
State gaming officials confirmed receiving KG Urban’s documents, the end result of financial negotiations that spanned months. Commissioners gave KG Urban extensions on application deadlines in February, March and twice in May.
“(Tuesday), KG Urban did submit requested documentation which is now under review by the MGC’s Investigations and Enforcement Bureau (IEB). The Commission will receive an update from the IEB on the overall Region C licensing process at MGC’s next public meeting,” commission spokesman Elaine Driscoll said in a news release.
Southeastern Massachusetts is known as Region C in state gaming circles.
The Gaming Commission is scheduled to respond to KG Urban’s submitted term sheet Thursday in Boston. Commissioners stated that plan May 28, when they granted KG Urban its final extension on the financial deal.
Tuesday’s deadline will enable IEB staff to review the term sheets Wednesday, ahead of the commission’s public meeting Thursday.
Closing a deal with GLPI — pending the commission’s approval — is a huge milestone for KG Urban and New Bedford casino backers. The proposal still faces hurdles including a positive vote June 23, completion of application materials late this summer or early in the fall, and then selection by the commission over a competing proposal in Brockton.
But securing hundreds of millions in financial backing amid an increasingly competitive casino market in the state and across New England, with unknowns including the lingering potential for tribal gaming in Taunton, is a significant statement.
“The confirmation that KG Urban has financial backing from GLPI is another positive step forward for the project,” Mayor Jon Mitchell said Tuesday. “There are many (steps) left to go, obviously, and I’m ready to support KG however I can in order to help the project down the road.”
A public casino forum is scheduled for 6 p.m. Wednesday at the Zeiterion Performing Arts Center downtown. The final forum scheduled so far is from 6 to 8 p.m. June 17 at Normandin Middle School in the North End.
Wednesday’s forum is sponsored by Leadership SouthCoast and SouthCoast Media Group. The June 17 forum is sponsored by the city.
A Brockton proposal by Mass Gaming & Entertainment is KG Urban’s only remaining competition for the single resort casino license the commission can allocate in Southeastern Massachusetts.
Brockton voters narrowly approved Mass Gaming’s $650 million proposal for a Brockton Fairgrounds site May 12, in that city’s referendum.
COMMENTS:
- Frank Haggerty
The casino is going to be built behind the 50 year old hurricane barrier certified in 2011 by the same US Army Corps of Engineers that certified the New Orleans levies that wiped out all the casinos.The local mainstream media reports news by omission. They are not going to report to the public the recent 2014 climate change report showing New Bedford Harbor underwater in a Cat 2 hurricane .
To build a casino on the waterfront in New Bedford the owners have to get by the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act ( MEPA ) . The casino is going to be built at the old toxic Cannon Street Power Plant who really knows whats buried in the underground vaults.
To build a casino on the waterfront in New Bedford the owners have to get by the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act ( MEPA ) . The casino is going to be built at the old toxic Cannon Street Power Plant who really knows whats buried in the underground vaults.
MR:
Should a glorified Slot Barn be constructed in Tiverton, it's difficult to envision revenues materializing.
Gambling Market Saturation has been widely reported.
Much like Twin River, should revenues fail to appear and bankruptcy ensue, any agreement will be re-written by the bankruptcy court.
Proposed New Bedford Foxwoods casino developer meets gaming deadline
Waterfront casino developer meets deadline
By Sean P. Murphy GLOBE STAFF
New Bedford casino developer: Deal signed, sealed and delivered
- http://www.enterprisenews.com/article/20150609/NEWS/150606019/?Start=2
New Bedford Casino Developer Meets Latest Application Deadline
June 10, 2015
http://www.casinonewsdaily.com/2015/06/10/new-bedford-casino-developer-meets-latest-application-deadline/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


Here is the plan : They continue to build the New Bedford Marine Commerce Terminal, Dredge 800,000 cubic yards of toxic material, continue the largest fishing fleet on the East Coast and now build a 650 million dollar casino on top of all this ?
New Bedford has only a single car exit off a two lane highway. The single car lane turns into a two lane highway that basically ends as a dead end in a residential neighborhood in the New Bedford South End. The city lacks infrastructure
The 2014 climate change report :
Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Planning Study for Water Quality Infrastructure in New Bedford, Fairhaven and Acushnet
http://climate.buzzardsbay.org/download/seaplan-climate-vulnerability-new-bedford-area.pdf