Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label lack of economic development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lack of economic development. Show all posts

Monday, June 22, 2015

Ignoring Experience: Plainville Slot Barn will spur economic development?





Plainville has a long history of making DUMB decisions! 

Many betting Plainridge Park Casino will spur economic development


Posted: Monday, June 22, 2015 
PLAINVILLE - Everyone knows that when Plainridge Park Casino opens officially Wednesday, it will ring in the era of casino gambling in Massachusetts.
But, will it also bring benefits in the form of economic development to an area thirsty for jobs and additional tax revenue?
Eric Schippers is betting it will.
"We've seen in other jurisdictions where we've invested in a casino that it's created growth in businesses like restaurants and hotels," said Schippers, vice president of government affairs for Plainridge parent Penn National Gaming. "Real estate values have gone up. Wherever we've gone, it's been a real shot in the arm for the local economy."
Schippers said Penn National has also sought to spread the benefits of additional customer traffic and consumer dollars throughout the area by signing cross promotional agreements with local businesses and attractions like Wrentham Village Premium Outlets and Patriot Place.
Other backers of the 100,000-square-foot slot parlor also see dollar signs - from additional tax revenues and fees to a potential catalyst for a building boom along Route 1.
Town Administrator Joseph Fernandes said revenues to the town are estimated at a minimum of $4.3 million per year for the first five years of operation. And, that doesn't include meals taxes from the venue's restaurants, which could reach $100,000 annually.
But Fernandes says other businesses likely will be attracted to locate in the area to share in customers the casino presumably would bring. 

Jack Lank, president of the United Regional Chamber of Commerce, also foresees a "ripple effect" as restaurants and retail stores seek to capitalize on additional consumer traffic.
But Clyde Barrow, a former University of Massachusetts professor who extensively studied gaming in the Northeast, isn't so bullish.
Barrow said the casino likely will provide a boost to local business because of the 500 or so employees who will be working there, but he doesn't see a big spillover of economic benefits from spending by casino patrons elsewhere in the community.


"You will see a little spending on gasoline and fast food as casino patrons come and go from the casino, but that's about it," he said.
There's no question that the casino will bring additional economic activity to the area. According to a study performed for the town of Plainville by Cummings Associates, Plainridge is forecast to take in $175.4 million in its first year.
The same study predicted that the number could jump by an additional $25 million or so the following year. However, Cummings says the take likely will fall somewhat as more casinos begin to open across the state.
Plainridge's slots and video table games are expected to attract about 6,000 people each day.
The same study, however, also pointed to a possible increase in demand for police and fire services, as well as social impacts like an increase in problem gambling.

http://www.thesunchronicle.com/news/local_news/many-betting-plainridge-park-casino-will-spur-economic-development/article_6a31f497-3946-5de8-b622-453d2e62df93.html


Sunday, November 16, 2014

Casinos Fail Old Industrial Towns






Peter Van Buren Headshot
Author of "Ghosts of Tom Joad: A Story of the #99Percent" and "We Meant Well"

Casinos Fail Old Industrial Towns

Posted:
 
 
 
 
 

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Newport Slot Barn a losing proposition




Eugene J. McKenna: Newport casino a losing proposition




Jobs, jobs, jobs! Economic development! We hear these words shouted at us many times a day. Of course these are major concerns in Rhode Island and throughout the country. But Citizens Concerned About Casino Gambling do not think that the introduction of casino gambling in Newport is a satisfactory response to these concerns. Therefore we oppose statewide Questions 1 and 2.
We believe that true economic development should provide goods and needed services that will benefit the residents. Gambling is a dead-end proposition with no added wealth for the community. One needs only to look at the closing of four casinos in Atlantic City in one month and the lessening of revenue in so many casinos nationwide, including Rhode Island.
CCACG believes that all the energy, time and money spent over the last few years in trying to expand a slots parlor into a full-scale casino in Newport could be better spent finding other ways to increase employment.
A good start would be with the North End Master Plan prepared for Newport in 2006. It should be given more attention and action for continued crucial development of the North End and the pursuit of high-quality technical and marine research jobs.
Gaming is an oversaturated industry. It seems that anyone who has ever wanted to try a casino has done so. The market is not expanding. Only the venues meant to cater to a finite number of gamblers is growing, oftentimes to close within a few years and lay off faithful employees.
Eventually, unless the anti-casino vote prevails in Massachusetts and on-line gambling continues to grow, there will be a further loss of gambling revenue for Rhode Island. We think it would be wise to overcome the ever-increasing losses by finding new areas of development in Rhode Island instead of just going blindly to the trough of gambling revenue.
The University of Rhode Island’s new and beautiful School of Pharmacy and the outstanding Oceanographic Institute along with all the possibilities of medical and educational districts in Providence are good signs that we can once again have a growing economy without casinos. Our flourishing tourist industry can also be further expanded without the branding of “casino” hanging over our heads.
Worse, Newport and the other communities in Rhode Island could easily lose control over any casino with the General Assembly legislating exceptions to zoning or alcohol laws as it did with a smoking ban.
Rhode Island has been receiving more revenue from gambling per capita than any other state in the country. The introduction of full casino gambling could even increase the frightening number of problem and addicted gamblers in Rhode Island with the attendant social costs caused by problem gambling, namely embezzlement, theft, bankruptcies, mortgage defaults, divorce and even suicides.
Baylor University Professor Earl L. Grinols, an expert on the costs and benefits of casino gambling, shows that for every dollar of casino revenue gained for the state, there are social costs of three dollars.
Revenue could also drop for Rhode Island if full casino games are allowed at Newport Grand, because the share for the state would only be 16 percent to 18 percent from the table games whereas the state now receives about 61 percent from the Twin River and Newport Grand slot machines. Surely not a winning proposition.
Therefore we encourage all Rhode Islanders to reject Questions 1 and 2 on Nov. 4, so that Rhode Island will not become an even more dangerous predator on its residents, very often on the very people least able to afford gambling losses.
The Rev. Eugene J. McKenna is president of Citizens Concerned About Casino Gambling.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Saturday, October 25, 2014

GOOD JOBS DON'T LEAD OTHERS TO HARM




****Please Share****
GOOD JOBS DON'T LEAD OTHERS TO HARM:

 Casinos like to talk about "good jobs". Every one of us is for creating good jobs, but good jobs don't cause others to lose theirs. Good jobs don't lead others to addiction, bankruptcy and broken homes. Good jobs don't cause other businesses to close, cut back or lay off their employees. Good jobs don't destroy other people's lives. Good jobs don't lead others to harm.
...
Is whatever you believe might be gained from casinos,
worth everything that you will lose?

On November 4th, Vote YES to Repeal the Casino Law
Vote YES on #3
Vote YES to STOP the Casino Mess
WANT TO HELP?
3 Ways You Can:
1) Please share/post these messages widely: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100005253047911
2) Volunteer: http://www.repealthecasinodeal.org/how-to-help
3) Donate: http://www.repealthecasinodeal.org/donate
We Can't Win Without YOU!
Find the full list of reasons to Vote YES on 3 here:
http://massvoteyeson3.blogspot.com/
http://massvoteyeson3.blogspot.com/…/good-jobs-dont-lead-ot…
See More
massvoteyeson3.blogspot.com|By John Epstein
 

Steve Wynn will make $360 million in profit... in one year... that money is already working in our communities... Send Steve Wynn packing... Vote Yes on Question 3!








An Everett casino's ripple effects cast a dark shadow over neighboring develop 


Photo: An Everett casino's ripple effects cast a dark shadow over neighboring development projects. Stop the mess with a yes on Question 3.




 
 
 
 




These ladies know what's best for Massachusetts. A Yes on Question 3!


Photo: These ladies know what's best for Massachusetts. A Yes on Question 3!




 
 
 
 


Monday, October 13, 2014

Day 17: 20 winning casino repeal arguments in 20 days




Casinos as Economic Stimulus. What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

The casino law is based on the absurd premise that the best way to stimulate the Massachusetts economy is to get more Massachusetts citizens to gamble more often. That premise is so illogical, it could only have been dreamed up by a room full of politicians, and the casino lobbyists who fund and influence them. And so it was.
Is whatever you believe might be gained from casinos,
worth everything that you will lose?
On November 4th, Vote YES to Repeal the Casino Law
Vote YES on #3
Vote YES to STOP the Casino Mess

Monday, October 6, 2014

In Massachusetts, the Rats Don't Even Have Sense....



...to recognize their sinking ship!

Declining revenues! Gambling Market Saturation! Casino Bailouts! Casino Bankruptcies!
Overstated projections!





GET THE FACTS! JOIN WITH YOUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS TO PROTECT YOUR COMMUNITY!

Question 3: Should the voters repeal casinos?

The Lowell Sun



By Bob Katzen  THE HOUSE AND SENATE. There were no roll calls in the House or Senate last week. This week, Beacon Hill Roll Call looks at Question 3, one of the four questions on the ballot that will be decided directly by the voters in November.   The question asks voters if they want to repeal a 2011 law legalizing gambling and allowing three casinos and one slot parlor in the Bay State. The state's Gaming Commission has already awarded licenses to Penn National Gaming for a slot parlor at the Plainridge Racecourse in Plainville. It has also chosen MGM Resorts to build the western Massachusetts casino in Springfield and Wynn Resorts for the eastern one in Everett. The commission anticipates the southeastern license will be awarded next August.   Following are the official arguments, gathered by the secretary of state, by each side of the question. FOR REPEAL: Written by Repeal The Casino Deal Committee. For more info, go to www.Question3Facts.org or call 617-701-7823.   "Massachusetts can do better than casinos. Just ask the 'experts': Governor Patrick, Speaker DeLeo and Senate President Murray agree: No casino in their hometowns. The former CEO of American Gaming said he would 'work very, very hard against' a casino in his hometown. Ledyard, Connecticut's mayor said there has been 'no economic development spin-off from (Foxwoods). Businesses do not come here.

' Moody's downgraded its casino outlook from 'stable' to 'negative' and Fitch Ratings said the casino market 'is reaching a saturation point.' Indiana prosecutors needed an additional court just to handle casino-related crimes. Listen to the experts. Vote Yes: Stop the casino mess."
 
AGAINST REPEAL: Written by Domenic Sarno, mayor of Springfield. For more info, go to www.ProtectMassJobs.com or call 617-520-4559. "A 'no' vote will preserve the state's Expanded Gaming Law, generating thousands of construction and permanent jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue for our cities and towns. Every year Massachusetts residents spend close to $900,000,000 at casinos in Connecticut, Rhode Island and Maine, adding millions to their state budgets. The law already has provided voters in several communities, including Springfield and Plainville, an opportunity to bring much-needed jobs and economic activity to their communities through first-class development projects. At the same time, the law has ensured that no community opposed to a casino within its borders will have one. To help further protect residents, the law contains industry-leading consumer safeguards and dedicated public-health funding. Vote 'no' on Question 3 to create jobs, economic growth and much-needed new revenue in Massachusetts."     LOCAL LEGISLATORS' VOTES FROM 2011 ON CASINOS: In November 2011, the House 121-33 and the Senate 24-13, approved the casino bill, and Gov. Deval Patrick signed it into law.   Two legislators, Reps. Brain Ashe (D-Longmeadow) and John Rogers (D-Norwood) both voted against the bill on this roll call but switched their votes on a later roll call and voted for it. (A "Yes" vote is for the casinos. A "No" vote is against them.)   Yes: Reps. James Arciero, D-Westford; Cory Atkins, D-Concord; Jennifer Benson, D-Lunenburg; Garry, D-Dracut; Thomas Golden, D-Lowell; Sheila Harrington, R-Groton; Marc Lombardo, R-Billerica; James Miceli, D-Wilmington; David Nangle, D-Lowell. Sens. Eileen Donoghue, D-Lowell; Jennifer Flanagan, D-Leominster; Bruce Tarr, R-Gloucester.   No: Rep. James Lyons, R-Republican. Sens. Kenneth Donnelly, D-Arlington; James Eldridge, D-Acton; Barry Finegold, D-Andover.
Other: Rep. Kenneth Gordon, D-Bedford, was not yet elected; Rep. Kevin Murphy, has resigned. Sen. Michael Barrett, was not yet elected.


Read more: http://www.lowellsun.com/news/ci_26671628/question-3-should-voters-repeal-casinos#ixzz3FPZ8jJ5y






Saturday, September 6, 2014

Do the math on Phony Casino Job Promises!


Do the math!

Revel, Showboat, Trump Plaza = 5,900 JOBS

5,000 JOBS PROMISED at Revel Alone!



Chris Christie loses a big Atlantic City bet, posing another challenge for 2016 run



September 5


— Underneath the gleaming new tower on the north end of the boardwalk, Gov. Chris Christie (R) placed a bet that this down-on-its-luck city was about to turn around. Revel, a massive $2.4 billion casino willed to completion by Christie, was supposed to provide 5,000 “permanent” jobs and fuel a revitalization to the entire city.

“The completion of Revel and its opening is a turning point for Atlantic City and a clear sign that people once again have faith in the city’s ability to come back,” Christie said before the 2012 grand opening, which featured a performance by megastar Beyoncé.

Two years later, the Revel is shuttered — wiping out thousands of jobs amid an economic implosion of the gambling industry here. Rather than serve as a shining example of Christie’s economic stewardship, Revel now stands as a 57-story example of failure in a city that has bedeviled New Jersey governors for decades.

This particular governor, however, is on the brink of deciding whether to run for president and is already struggling with a political scandal over the closure of the George Washington Bridge. His handling of the Revel case creates more problems for his preferred image as a can-do executive who gets results, even if it means working with Democrats.

The casino’s collapse also leaves the tough-talking governor open to criticism from social conservatives in early primary states such as Iowa and South Carolina, who oppose gambling as a vice and who already distrusted Christie’s centrist leanings. Libertarians, meanwhile, question the role of a state government in attempting to prop up such a risky private endeavor.


Even those sympathetic to Christie’s efforts here criticize him for listening to Wall Street analysts, who were bullish on Revel and its ability to transform the city. “He got duped,” said Bob McDevitt, president of Unite Here Local 54, a local union with about 9,000 casino workers.

McDevitt said unions warned Christie and his predecessor, Democrat Jon Corzine, that it was too risky to open a massive casino at a time of economic turmoil and expanding competition from nearby states. “It fell on deaf ears,” he said. “They’re all complicit in it.”

The governor has organized a closed-door, bipartisan summit to be held here Monday designed to figure out what to do with Revel and three other casinos that have closed or will soon do so.

The answers coming out of the gathering could go a long way toward determining whether Atlantic City’s troubles will become an anchor weighing down Christie in a potential 2016 bid.

“I’m certainly not ready to throw in the towel on this. We have a lot of work to do,” Christie said at a mid-August news conference just days after the announcement that the Revel, Showboat and Trump Plaza casinos would all close in September. About 5,900 jobs will disappear, amounting to about 20 percent of the casino workforce in Atlantic City.

Christie’s advisers say he has tried to make the best of a very bad situation. By the time he took office in January 2010, Revel was half-built on the boardwalk, a hulking mass of steel that was losing its financing. Morgan Stanley decided to take a nearly $1 billion loss on the project rather than spending more than $1 billion more to finish the project. One option was to halt construction — leaving an unfinished project looming over a boardwalk already struggling with blight.

Instead, Christie’s administration pushed forward and found new investors by early 2011, luring them with the promise of up to $261 million in tax incentives.

The incentives could only be claimed if the project was profitable, which never happened. The governor’s advisers believe he can escape conservative criticism by saying that no taxpayer dollars were lost on the project.

State Senate President Steve Sweeney (D) and other key politicos from both parties supported the plans.

At the time, Christie boasted of the government’s role in sealing the deal, asking his idol, the liberal musician Bruce Springsteen, to perform at the new casino. “I think Bruce, if he’s true to his lyrics, would love the fact that the state used taxpayer funds to invest in this place to create jobs for working men and women,” he said.

Revel’s backers believed that they had created an antidote to many of the problems with Atlantic City’s casinos, which were premised on the convenience of gamblers who would make day trips in buses from Philadelphia, New York and Baltimore to play slots for a few hours and return home.

Outside the casino walls lay a city that was still struggling, with little draw to tourists. The average Las Vegas visitor spends three nights there, while the Atlantic City visitor stays 11 hours, according to William J. Pascrell III, a lobbyist representing gambling clients. For decades, the Las Vegas-based companies that ran most of the casinos here vacuumed up the gambling profits but did little to promote redevelopment of the surrounding area, preferring to keep customers inside. “That was a Las Vegas mentality,” Atlantic City Mayor Don Guardian said.

Revel was designed to appeal to well-heeled tourists looking for nice rooms to stay in, high-end restaurants and popular entertainment acts in the casino’s club. Some state officials feared the Revel would be so successful it might cannibalize other casinos on the boardwalk and take dollars away from competitors on the western edge of town by the marina, such as Borgata and Harrah’s.

Instead, Guardian said, “The building just didn’t come together.”

Those convenience gamblers from neighboring states drifted away, draining nearly half the $5.2 billion wagered in Atlantic City in 2006. Big-dollar gamblers did not like Revel’s odd designs — the casino was six floors up — and its restriction on smoking.

Staggering debt payments made it impossible to turn a profit, not to mention a specialty energy system to heat and cool the tower that added $30 million a year in costs. Five months after Christie christened the casino as a “game changer” for the city, Wall Street downgraded its debt. Springsteen never performed there.

All this came as the city saw some measures of growth, according to Elizabeth Cartmell, president of the Atlantic City Alliance, the marketing group whose “Do AC” campaign has tried to drum up customers.

But there just aren’t enough gamblers to fill the blackjack tables and slot machines when 14 new casinos were added to the Mid-Atlantic region in the past decade. Overall revenue for slot machines increased less than 9 percent since 2001, despite 50 percent more slot machines in the region. “What you see is a clear shifting in where the dollars are being spent,” Cartmell said.


This week, Christie traveled to Mexico on a trade mission. He will hope to find some answer to the Atlantic City problem, both to boost the city and for his own national ambitions.

“We are, I believe, at a nadir,” said McDevitt, the union leader. “If it’s followed up with real action, I think it will be a positive story for Governor Christie. If nothing changes, the city’s languishing, sure, it’s a problem.”



http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/chris-christie-loses-a-big-atlantic-city-bet-posting-another-challenge-for-2016-run/2014/09/05/d7471a7a-33b0-11e4-8f02-03c644b2d7d0_story.html?wpisrc=nl_pmpol&wpmm=1

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Donald Trump: “I got out seven years ago. My timing was tremendous”









By Joan Vennochi | GLOBE COLUMNIST JULY 20, 2014

THOUSANDS OF jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenues would fall like manna from gambling heaven. For two decades, that’s been the big talking point behind the push to bring casinos to Massachusetts.
 
Hyperbole was always part of the pitch. But today, the rosiest projections seem ever more fanciful. Just as Massachusetts starts to bank on the money, the glitter is wearing off the industry. No matter how glitzy the drawings for the next gambling mecca, the business itself looks old, tired, and battered by competition — not just from new online gambling options but from other old-school casinos.
The industry slide leaves Massachusetts behind the curve, instead of ahead of it.
Four of 12 casinos are shutting down in Atlantic City, and casinos in Delaware and West Virginia are struggling. In Connecticut, Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun just reported double-digit declines in slots revenues. Even Reno now prefers to pitch itself as a destination for high-tech companies rather than a remote Nevada haven for gamblers and quickie-divorce seekers.
There is dramatic oversupply in the industry right now,” Foxwoods chief executive Scott Butera told The Wall Street Journal. That’s especially true in the Northeast, where more casinos have opened over the past decade than in any other region, the Journal reports. The market is “reaching a saturation point,” according to a recent Fitch Ratings report that was also cited by the Journal.
With three casinos and a slots parlor in the pipeline — plus a bid by the Aquinnah Wampanoag tribe to run a fourth casino in the state — Massachusetts will only add to a saturated market. But the shifting fortunes of the gambling industry have yet to infiltrate the political dialogue or dull the appetite of casino operators. Indeed, despite Butera’s somber take on his own industry, Foxwoods was still vying to build a casino in Massachusetts, in the town of Milford, until voters rejected its bid in November.
The state is already relying on gambling revenue, even though a ballot question this November will present voters with the chance to repeal the 2011 casino law. The budget just signed by Governor Deval Patrick includes $73 million in anticipated revenue from casino licensing fees and the slots parlor.
David D’Alessandro, the former John Hancock chief executive and longtime gambling foe who is helping to fund the repeal effort, said the gambling market in Massachusetts is already saturated before a casino even opens. “We’re going to be stealing from our own lottery,” he said, referring to the 42-year-old state lottery, which leads the nation in per capita wagering.
According to its website, the state lottery returned over $955.8 million in net profit to the state in fiscal 2013. Of that, $868.9 million in local aid was distributed to the Commonwealth’s 351 cities and towns. A succession of casino impact reports over the years predicted some money would be siphoned off from the lottery, but advocates have always insisted the state could somehow make it up.
Why would Massachusetts want to give up 100 percent of lottery-generated revenue for 25 percent of gross casino-generated revenue? “We’re smarter than that,” said D’Alessandro.
Or at least we should be.
Still, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission website continues to predict $300 million to $500 million in annual new revenue. The website prominently displays news about the gambling debate in the Commonwealth — but omits any headlines about the industry’s souring prospects nationally.
Despite growing evidence to the contrary, Massachusetts still thinks of casinos as a growth industry. Maybe they were 20 years ago. But today, starting up the casino industry in Massachusetts feels like starting up Wang Laboratories in the age of Google.
Massachusetts prides itself on adaptation — on its ability to foster new tech startups in areas where clipper ships once delivered riches from overseas. Yet with casinos, it’s buying into an industry as old as time and riskier than ever before.
As Atlantic City struggles to reinvent itself, it can only dream of having an economy as diverse and thriving as Boston’s. As Atlantic City’s Trump Plaza Casino prepares to close in mid-September, Donald Trump crowed that he only has a 10 percent stake in Trump Entertainment Resorts, which owns it. “I got out seven years ago. My timing was tremendous,” said Trump.
Too bad Massachusetts, which is just now getting into casinos, can’t say the same.
Joan Vennochi can be reached at vennochi@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @Joan_Vennochi.