Friday, July 13, 2012
Community leaders voice casino concerns
Saturday, February 12, 2011
Mr. Speaker, What are you hiding?
His zeal is suspect.
Below is a SHNS article about SB 339 calling for an INDEPENDENT COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS.
Beacon Hill has frittered away taxpayers' hard-earned dollars on phony reports that extol the wildly exaggerated revenue and job creation numbers, beginning with the Governor spending $189,000 for the first Spectrum Gaming report.
None of those reports considered the costs and impacts that will be imposed on communities and regions. Those costs will be substantial.
The Massachusetts Lottery provides more revenue to Massachusetts cities and towns than 256 Nevada Casinos.
Here:
Massachusetts Lottery earns more than Nevada's 256 Casinos
Massachusetts Lottery Revenues:
2008 $913 million
2009 $859 million
2010 $903 million
From this article:
Largest Nev. Casinos Lose $3.4B During Fiscal 2010
Nevada's 256 largest casinos lose $3.4B during fiscal 2010, compared with $6.8B previous year [And don't miss that article!]
The Associated Press
By OSKAR GARCIA Associated Press
Nevada's 256 casinos paid $777.6 million in taxes
Maybe it's time for Beacon Hill to clean house and restore transparency and ethics before embarking on another BLOATED REGULATORY BUREAUCRACY filled with unqualified political hacks and campaign contributors.
Please note that not one of Middleboro's elected delegation signed on to co-sponsor this legislation. Each of them voted for this flawed legislation, even the crap produced on the closing day of the legislative session that contained 17 pages of ERRATA, some of which changed the intent.
Maybe one-party rule doesn't make sense when we send mindless dweebs to Boston who are incapable of supporting the best interests of the Commonwealth over the strong-arming of the Speaker.
From:
Florida: False Promises
A 2010 report by the New Hampshire Gambling Commission concluded that adding one casino (in New Hampshire) would raise $219 million in state revenue, but the total social cost would be $287.7 million: a net drain of $68.7 million.
BREWER FILES BILL TO REQUIRE GAMBLING COSTS-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
[from SHNS, no link available]
By Kyle Cheney
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE
STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, FEB. 5, 2011…..Sen. Stephen Brewer, appointed to the Senate’s most powerful budget-writing post last month by Senate President Therese Murray, is backing legislation championed by anti-gambling forces that requires a detailed cost-benefit analysis as a prerequisite to the introduction of slot parlors or casinos.
“We want a data-driven discussion,” said Kathleen Conley Norbut, an anti-gambling advocate who previously led United to Stop Slots Massachusetts. “We don’t want benefit studies done by the gambling industries having that kind of disinformation continue to be spread.”
Brewer, who voted against expanded gambling legislation last session, has declared himself open-minded on the issue and was appointed to chair to Senate Ways and Means Committee despite voting last year to reject a proposal that would have sanctioned three casinos and two slot parlors. The bill passed the House and Senate in July but died when Gov. Deval Patrick sent it back to the Legislature after lawmakers had adjourned formal sessions for the year.
Expanded gambling critics have pushed for a cost-benefit analysis, arguing other studies commissioned by the governor and Legislature omitted details about the potential downside of expanded gambling.
Brewer did not respond to a request for comment.
Brewer’s proposal, co-sponsored by 20 lawmakers, would require Patrick to commission a “comprehensive independent analysis of the costs and benefits” of legalizing new forms of gambling in Massachusetts. The study would be required to assess:
- Impacts on communities that host expanded gambling facilities and other communities within a 25-mile radius;
- Short-term, medium-term and long-term impacts that factor in the potential effect of gambling facilities being built in other states along the Massachusetts border, the impact of a potential casino on tribal land in Massachusetts, and the potential impact of the legalization of internet gambling;
- The effect on the economy that occurs because of jobs created by the gambling industry but also “the adverse impacts on jobs whose existence pre-dates” expanded gambling;
- The increase in tax revenue to the state, but also “the anticipated loss or diminution of revenues” from businesses damaged by the introduction of gambling; and,
- The costs to Massachusetts or communities hosting gambling facilities of establishing a new regulatory structure to oversee the industry, addressing any increase in criminal activity that results from gambling, incarcerating those found guilty of violating new gambling laws, capital improvements necessary to accommodate new gambling facilities, compulsive gambling, increased bankruptcies, and increased health care utilization to address gambling addiction issues.
According to the legislation, if the study concludes that the expanded gambling’s costs outweigh its benefits, any expanded gambling legislation would require two-third approval in the House and the Senate to reach the governor’s desk.
Norbut, who is also listed as a co-sponsor of the legislation, blistered House Speaker Robert DeLeo, who has vowed a renewed push for expanded gambling this session.
“The speaker borders on being obsessed with this issue, and that’s unfortunate for the comprehensive needs of the commonwealth,” she said. “It’s no surprise to hear him continuing to go with supporting misinformation.”
DeLeo has supported expanded gambling, particularly slot parlors at existing racetracks, as an immediate source of local aid for cities and towns who are bracing for a cut next fiscal year.
“The speaker’s made his concerns clear in the dire fiscal situation about the need for revenue and the need for jobs,” said DeLeo spokesman Seth Gitell.
Asked whether he’d be open to a cost-benefit analysis, Gitell said, “At this time we haven’t seen the bill in the House.”
DeLeo and Gov. Patrick have indicated they might try to work out their differences on gambling behind closed doors to prevent the issue from consuming the legislative agenda. But both have also recently acknowledged they haven’t had a substantive conversation about gambling since talks collapsed last July.
Sen. Jennifer Flanagan (D-Leominster) filed a three-casino proposal in early January, hoping to spur debate on the issue earlier in the session and prevent a repeat of last year’s race against the clock.
Co-sponsors of Brewer’s bill include: Rep. Ellen Story (D-Amherst), a House Floor Division leader; Rep. William Brownsberger (D-Belmont); Rep. Thomas Conroy (D-Wayland); Rep. James Lyons (R-Andover); Rep. Elizabeth Malia (D-Jamaica), co-chair of the Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse; Rep. Ryan Fattman (R-Sutton); Rep. Carlo Basile (D-East Boston); Rep. Frank Smizik (D-Brookline); Rep. Ruth Balser (D-Newton); Rep. Carolyn Dykema (D-Holliston); Rep. Todd Smola (R-Palmer); Rep. Brian Ashe (D-Longmeadow); Rep. Denise Provost (D-Somerville); Sen. Patricia Jehlen (D-Somerville); Sen. Susan Fargo (D-Lincoln); Sen. Cynthia Creem (D-Newton); Sen. Richard Moore (D-Uxbridge); Sen. Michael Knapik (R-Westfield); Sen. James Eldridge (D-Acton); and Sen. Benjamin Downing (D-Pittsfield).
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Self Exclusion
Two of Middleboro's Reprentatives, Tom Calter and Steve Canessa both voted against the Self Exclusion Amendment and ignored requests for an explanation.
Whether we blame it on a willingness to please the Speaker or ignorance of the Industry, how did your Representative vote?
Below, is action Pennsylvania has taken for violation of the self-exclusion policy.
That part Pennsylvania may have gotten right. They just forgot about the kids being left in cars, among other things.
Smack into the face of addiction offers a few responses of the uninformed legislators who passed Casino Legislation at midnight on the 4th of July --
"One thing that we never expected was for people to leave their kids inside their cars while they went inside to gamble," said Fred Harran, Bensalem's public safety director.
"Of all the problems we thought about that were going to happen, this is one thing that was probably inconceivable," State Rep. Gene DiGirolamo (R., Bucks) said at a noon news conference Thursday in Bensalem.
Added State Sen. Robert M. Tomlinson (R., Bucks): "We were all shocked when we first heard of these incidents."
"It's amazing to me that legislators are surprised at this stuff," said Paul Boni, a Philadelphia lawyer who has represented anti-casino groups. "You are looking smack into the face of the addiction.
"They are surprised because they haven't thought about it and haven't looked into the issue."
That was shown to be a lowball count when the Louisville (Ky.) Courier-Journal studied Indiana Gaming Commission records to reveal 37 incidents in which 72 children were left unattended at casinos in that state in 1999 and 2000.
Self-Exclusion List Violations Lead to $40,000 Fine for PA Casino
HARRISBURG, Pa., Oct. 27
The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board today fined Mount Airy #1 LLC, operator of Mount Airy Casino Resort, $40,000 for allowing individuals on the statewide Self-Exclusion List to gain access to the gaming floor and place wagers, and for sending promotional mailings to a self-excluded individual.
The Self-Exclusion Program is administered by the PGCB and assists problem gamblers who choose to ban themselves from gambling at Pennsylvania casinos. Once a person is placed on the Self-Exclusion List, gaming facilities in the Commonwealth must refuse wagers from, and deny gaming privileges to, a self-excluded person, including issuance of a player's club membership. The casino must also remove self-excluded persons from targeted mailings and other forms of advertising or promotions. If an individual on the Self-Exclusion List enters a Pennsylvania casino, they will be subject to arrest for trespass.
The civil penalties, unanimously approved by the Board at its public meeting Wednesday in Harrisburg, were for three incidents in 2009 and one in 2010. The fine was part of a consent agreement between the Board's Office of Enforcement Counsel and the operator of the Monroe County casino.
The first incident involved an individual on the Self-Exclusion List who gamed at Mount Airy Casino Resort over the course of four days. During the four-day period from July 20-23, 2009, the self excluded individual gamed and opened a check cashing account with a Mount Airy cashier and cashed checks on five separate occasions.
The second incident involved an individual on the Self-Exclusion List who gamed at Mount Airy on September 25, 2009, and was paid a jackpot in the amount of $2,515.
The third incident involved an individual on the Self-Exclusion List who gamed at Mount Airy on July 23, 2009, September 23, 2009 and November 28.
The fourth incident involved a self-excluded individual who received six separate mailings from Mount Airy regarding promotions that were running between February 2010 and April 2010.
This is the fourth time a casino in Pennsylvania has been fined for Self-Exclusion List violations. The first two fines were levied on the Meadows Racetrack and Casino in December 2009 for $5,000 and in April 2010 for $20,000. The third fine was against Parx Casino in April 2010 for $10,000.
About the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board was established in 2004 with the passage of Act 71, also known as the Race Horse Development and Gaming Act. Pennsylvania's first new state agency in nearly 40 years, the Gaming Control Board is tasked to oversee all aspects of the state's casino industry. To date, with ten casinos in operation, legalized gaming in the Commonwealth has created over 13,000 new living wage jobs [Translation: Keep adding political manure and the number will keep growing. This ovestates the numbers reported elsewhere], revenue that has provided property tax reduction in each of the past three years for all homeowners, funds that have reinvigorated Pennsylvania's horse racing industry, and new revenue to local governments that has funded scores of community projects [And left children abandoned in parking lots because legislators failed to conduct their due diligence]. A wealth of information about the Gaming Control Board and Pennsylvania's gaming industry can be found at http://www.pgcb.state.pa.us/.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Beacon Hill's Folly
Beacon Hill Casino Cheerleaders tout the wildly overstated jobs.
In this statement, it is unclear whether 11,000 people are employed in 12 or 13 slot barns in Missouri, but it's still a far cry from the 15,000 Beacon Hill falsely claims will come from 3 Destination Slot Barns.
Missouri's 13 casinos (currently 12 because of the closure of President Casino in the summer) have pumped $5 billion into the state in gambling and admission taxes alone since 1994. Then there are the economic basics: 11,000 people employed by casinos, with annual wages of $341 million per year. The Isle of Capri's proposed casino could generate $3 million a year for Cape Girardeau from projected annual gambling revenue of $88.7 million, and the addition of 400 jobs to the economy.
A Missouri Gaming Commission official said the state hasn't conducted a study on problem gamblers in Missouri, relying on regional and national research. But about 15,000 people are on the state's disassociated persons list -- those who have voluntarily asked to be banned from the state's casinos. [The self-exclusion lists, not uncommon, was only narrowly approved in the Massachusetts House. Two of Middleboro's Representatives, Calter and Canessa opposed it, perhaps because of their willingness to blindly please House Speaker DeLeo or perhaps because they're fully uninformed about the issue. They have ignored email requests to explain their opposition.]
About 1 percent of U.S. adults, or 2 million people, are estimated to be pathological gamblers, the most severe form of the addiction, according to the National Council on Problem Gambling. As many as 6 million would be considered problem gamblers.
Cindy Imbus could have been another statistic. Nearly a decade ago, the East Dubuque, Ill., woman swallowed a bottle of sleeping pills, she said, to end her battle with compulsive gambling. In a 2001 article in the Dubuque Telegraph Herald, Imbus said she was revived in the emergency room but remained in a coma for a few days. She spent weeks relearning to walk and talk. Imbus told the newspaper that she gambled away tens of thousands of dollars at Dubuque's casinos and that her addiction drove her family into bankruptcy.
In Iowa, the proliferation of casinos has produced some reported pockets of increased problem gambling, although there was a slight decline in calls to the state's help line last year, said Mark Vander Linden, program manager for Iowa's Office of Problem Gambling Treatment and Prevention. An updated study on compulsive gambling is expected next spring. The last comprehensive report, issued in 1995, found the prevalence of problem gambling in Iowa was about 5.4 percent of those who gamble.
Dickinson acknowledges that the convenience of the city's two casinos may have "ruined the lives of some individuals.
If an Industry only exists because it causes ADDICTION and 6% of the population is at risk, what's the cost?
Professional tells us the cost for each ADDICT is + $13,000.
How is it acceptable to knowingly throw people under the bus for a "Something for Nothing" scheme and believe it's OK?
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
What is family destruction worth?
Casinos, table games bring mixed results to Pa. communities
Negative impact of casino
While some businesses are benefitting from the increased traffic casinos are
drawing, casinos are taking businesses away from others.
Jeff Stewart, owner of Alden Manor in Nanticoke, about 14 miles away from[Don't worry, Jeff. It will get worse.]
Mohegan Sun, said some customers are now eating more often at Mohegan Sun, where they could get free buffets when they earn enough points from the slot
machines.
Casinos also have led to other social problems.
The helpline for the Council on Compulsive Gambling of Pennsylvania has
received 12,575 calls about gambling problems so far this year and 2,295 were
related to casinos. Of the calls, 642 have reported financial problems, 45 said
they have filed for bankruptcy, 354 reported having credit problems, 608 have
reported debts, 83 said they were divorced and 97 reported mental health
problems.
Dianne M. Berlin of Casino Free PA, a statewide coalition of people and
groups opposing casinos in Pennsylvania, said she believes casinos cause more
harm than good.
"Gambling does not create new wealth. They continue to extract money from
people without giving them any products or services in return like a regular
business," Berlin said. "When you legalize something this harmful, the
legislators knew this would create addicts."
Berlin said she believes casinos are leading to more bankruptcies and debts
as more people deplete their earnings, savings, retirement funds and their
children's college funds gambling. Offering free drinks is another way casinos
bring in more money, she added
"Alcohol most certainly affects judgment of people. Casinos operators know
that," Berlin said. "They know their judgement is impaired and under those
circumstances, the influence of alcohol keeps them gambling longer."
In Bucks County several instances were reported of parents leaving their
children in cars while they gambled at Parx Casino in Bensalem.
At a news conference Thursday in Bensalem, state Sen. Robert "Tommy"
Tomlinson, R-Bucks County, and state Rep. Gene DiGirolamo, R-Bucks County,
introduced legislation to crack down on adults who leave children unattended
while gambling. They said their measure, with a possible prison term of 3½ to
seven years and a fine of up to $15,000, is needed to serve as a deterrent for
gamblers who visit casinos and leave children behind in the parking lot.
Gambling into debt
A Swoyersville resident, who asked to remain anonymous, says she is still
struggling with debt from gambling at Mohegan Sun.
"As soon as I got a paycheck, I was at the casino," she said. "Even if I
didn't have a paycheck, I was putting it on a credit card."
She and a friend once went to a Gamblers Anonymous meeting, and when no one
else showed up, they went to Mohegan Sun instead.
"You think you're going to get ahead but you don't and you go the next day
to try to make it up and you find yourself further in the hole," she said. "It's
a cycle. It's just like being an alcoholic."
Her gambling problem led her to sign up for the Pennsylvania Gaming Control
Board's self-exclusion program, which allows a person to request to be banned
from all legalized gaming activities and to be prohibited from collecting
winnings, recovering losses or accepting free gifts.
Two years ago, she violated the program and state police charged her with
defiant trespass after she went to Mohegan Sun to play the slots. Now, she stays
away from the casino.
"I would rather keep my husband and my kids," she said. "He would try to get
me out of there. I was bouncing checks and I never did that before."
Statewide, a total of 1,639 people have signed
up for a self-exclusion program banning themselves from gambling
at Pennsylvania casinos, said Richard McGarvey, spokesman for the Pennsylvania
Gaming Control Board.
Casino officials say they take responsible gaming seriously. In addition to
participating in the self-exclusion program, responsible gaming brochures are
available throughout casinos. Tax dollars the casinos pay to the state helps
fund compulsive gambling programs. Outside of tax dollars, casinos contribute to
the Council on Compulsive Gambling of Pennsylvania each year.
In Massachusetts, the Self-Exclusion Amendment barely passed the House.
This year, operating casinos throughout the state are required by law to
contribute $2 million or 0.002 multiplied by their total gross
terminal revenue, whichever is greater, to the Compulsive and Problem Gambling
Treatment Fund, said Holli Senior, spokeswoman for the state health
department.
Gamblers who need help can call the Council on Compulsive Gambling of
Pennsylvania's helpline at 1-800-GAMBLER.
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
If you don't want to be treated like a clown........

The opponents attempted to improve the disaster with sensible legislation, including a Self Exclusion Amendment that barely passed.
My Representative, Tom Calter, voted against the amendment and has failed to offer an explanation in spite of two queries for his reasoning. Not to worry! He's toast in November!
But then Representative Steve Canessa (a Middleboro Rep. as well) also voted against it and also ignored my inquiry.
Middleboro is BLESSED with 3 State Reps., the other? The Invisible William Straus who hasn't located Middleboro on the map. He got lost once and we saw him. At least I think it was him.
Then came the Slap Dash Senate version, differing in many respects, crafted, we are told by Senate President's lackey, Senator Rosenberg, the elf pictured here.
Since that version was also released....was it Father's Day weekend? Amendments also required to be submitted by Monday, there went that weekend!
NO comparison was ever done as far as I know because I requested it from several sources.
When the most recent Slap Dash version was released from the Conference Committee on Friday, did anyone seriously expect a reasonable product?
And these were the House Speaker's Pearls of Wisdom --
“Been disrespected once too many” times by Patrick, the chair said.
“Going to fight back,” the chair said DeLeo told members.
After reading legislation, amendments, watching and reading testimony, new reading glasses were required, and honestly? How could you expect something reasonable and responsible to be produced by this crowd?
ERRATA CORRECTED MISTAKES IN GAMBLING BILL
On Monday morning, two days after the gambling bill passed the House and Senate, the Legislature's website featured an error-riddled draft of the proposal, with no corrected version.
The six lawmakers who negotiated the compromise gambling bill signed off Sunday on 17 pages worth of changes to the bill, including some that erase sections of the bill and another that revises the formula used to distribute the states' gambling proceeds. The corrections, obtained by the News Service, also strike a section that requires gambling license applications to be public records.
As of Monday morning, the Legislature's website included the lengthy lists of corrections, known as "errata," but lawmakers were denied the chance at an explanation before the bills passed, and the effects of the changes remain unclear.
A pair of gambling critics sought an explanation during Saturday's race to pass the bills but were ignored, as Senate President Murray steamrolled the bills through and opted to ignore gambling opponents who raised questions about certain procedural motions. Murray, who has frequently pointed to the Senate's eight days of debate on its original gambling proposal in June, clamped down on Saturday, in the rush to get the bills to Patrick's desk by midnight, the end of formal business for the year.
Sen. Stanley Rosenberg (D-Amherst), Murray's point-man on gambling, told the News Service Monday that gambling application will still be public under language in a separate part of the bill. He also said sections that were struck pertaining to Native American tribes were duplicates of sections included elsewhere.
Although the errata struck a public health fund, Rosenberg said the bill maintains the same amount of public-health-related funding.
On the final night, Murray rammed through orders restricting debate on the final gambling bills to two 30-minute periods. When the bills came up to be sent to the governor, she restricted debate to two 10-minute periods. During those periods, Murray recognized only gambling supporters for the bulk of that time, permitting a gambling opponent to speak at the end of one of the 10-minute periods. As late as Saturday evening, some members, including Sen. Susan Tucker (D-Andover), the Senate's most vocal gambling opponent, were unaware that the conferees had filed any corrections.
Other members said they had difficulty accessing the corrections even after they were aware of their existence. Kathleen Conley Norbut, head of United to Stop Slots Massachusetts, told the News Service she has yet to see a corrected version of the gambling bills.
"Problem being neither did legislators who already voted on the bill before theses errors were identified. They did not have an opportunity to do their job and honor the people's business," she said in an email. "The people have no reason to believe that there aren't other errors in this catastrophic special interest rush-job."
After hearing about this, many voters - faithful voters some whom worked hard to get some of these candidates elected are questioning the process, questioning the seriousness with which these people hold their office and represent them.
They didn't even know what they were voting on?
We can do better!
And so, if you don't want to be treated like a clown, you can't behave like one.
So much for 'Getting it right'!
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Testicles lost on Beacon Hill
It reminded me of something posted recently on Blue Mass Group:
The Speaker can tell them where to SIT, he cannot TELL them how to vote
Today that Speaker is a forgotten ugly blotch on our State history - while Markey went on to become a powerful Congressman. (No, I don't give old blotches publicity by putting their names on the net).
Markey famously used "He can tell me where to sit, he cannot tell me how to vote" and a video of that lonely desk in the hallway in his campaign.
Just saying...where are the "brass balls" in this legislature? Like citizens, really, all legislators have is their VOTE.
You don't have to be too old to know the sad legacy of Beacon Hill leaders charged with some nasty things like crime, corruption and abuse of power, but watching history repeat itself is daunting.
It didn't escape public notice that when the current Speaker ascended the throne, he appointed some mindless incompetents to Chairmenships - those easily controlled, willing to genuflect (and most appreciative of the extra pay), who really lacked the intellectual capacity to fulfill their responsibilities. Peter Principal, anyone?
The Senate President distanced herself from the Predatory Gambling Follies by appointing a formerly opposed Senator, not very bright, whose 'justification' is anecdotal tales lacking substance. Besides, he really liked to travel, have his ego stroked. Little man whose public image resembles a court jester!
They never protested the flawed process, lack of public input, that the Industry crafted the legislation.
They're not talking about how truly BAD this legislation is.
They're not discussing the flaws.
They're not considering the impacts on communities or the increased crime.
They're not insisting that an Independent Cost Benefit Analysis should have been conducted.
They're trying to figure out how to get some of the gravy for themselves.
Feckless doesn't seem adequate.
