Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label convenience play. Show all posts
Showing posts with label convenience play. Show all posts

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Casinos feel heat from neighboring states




Casinos feel heat from neighboring states


Updated 7:56 am, Sunday, July 31, 2016


For nearly a decade, Connecticut gaming revenue has declined. Competition from other forms of entertainment and the effects of the recession are among the reasons often cited for this trend.
But it’s a third factor that has driven efforts to build a third casino, this time in the Hartford area.
“The gaming revenues have declined over the last nine years, in part because of new competition coming on from neighboring states,” said Colin Mansfield, associate director at Fitch Ratings.
With the anticipated 2018 opening of an MGM casino in nearby Springfield, Mass., the tribes that operate the state’s casinos, Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods, have warned the new venture could cause Connecticut to lose $702 million in revenue, up to $100 million in annual tax receipts and 9,300 direct and indirect gaming jobs.
“Convenience and drive time are important factors in interstate gaming,” Mansfield said. He said when a casino opened in New York City, near John F. Kennedy Airport, several years ago, it affected local revenue as people in southern Connecticut gravitated south.
In the same way, a casino in Massachusetts could draw in people from the northern part of the state. “Since convenience is such an important factor, it may be attractive to residents of northern Connecticut,” Mansfield said.
Because of this, he said it makes sense that locations in the Greater Hartford area are being considered for a third casino. “That’s just strategic in a sense that it could help keep residents from going across the border,” he said.
Last year, the Mohegan Tribe and the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation together received state approval to build a new casino along Interstate 91.
“They employ thousands of people directly and support small businesses throughout the state,” said Andrew Doba, a spokesman for the two tribes. “Given the state’s fiscal outlook, these jobs and the revenue these two facilities send to the state are more important now than ever.”
MGM is now suing the state, claiming that the law that allowed the joint venture between the tribes on non-tribal land is unconstitutional.
The Schaghticoke Indian tribe, backed by MGM, has also filed a lawsuit claiming the law is unconstitutional because it excludes other possible casino operators from bidding on a facility.
“We have believed for some time that Connecticut is an attractive marketplace, and we continue to think that,” said Alan Feldman, executive vice president of MGM Resorts International. “We’d like the opportunity to compete.”
He added he believed the state should conduct a thorough review of where a third casino should be located.
“If the state believes a third casino — its first commercial casino — can benefit the state economically, why is that discussion being limited to north central Connecticut?” Feldman said. “If maximizing job creation and revenue is the goal, why not take a step back and look at the entire state to see where a third casino might best be able to flourish?”
Mansfield noted Fitch analysts have a cautious view on regional gaming because other avenues of entertainment, like social gaming and the lottery, are growing in popularity.
“Those segments are seeing healthy growth rates, and they’re alternative forms of gambling,” Mansfield said.
“There are so many more forms of entertainment today than there were 30, 40 or 50 years ago,” added Alex Bumazhny, senior director at Fitch Ratings.
He said the number of slot machines across the country has declined over the years due to less interest in that form of gambling.
“Historically, the baby boomers and Generation X have gambled considerably more,” Bumazhny said, noting that these generations have more free time and more disposable income.
According to a study released in 2014 by the American Gaming Association, the gaming industry contributes $240 billion to the U.S. economy, including revenues of more than $81 billion from casinos.
The study, conducted by Oxford Economics, also found that gaming directly employs approximately 734,000 U.S. workers and generates nearly $17.3 billion in federal taxes, about $11 billion in state and local taxes and nearly $10 billion in state and local gaming taxes.
Connecticut’s gaming revenue has steadily declined over the last decade, but recently state gaming revenues appear to be stabilizing, and have remained more or less flat over the last 12 months, Mansfield said.
Bumazhny attributed this to several factors, including lower gas prices and a milder winter. “People tend to drive less to casinos when the weather is bad,” he noted. The lower gas prices, meanwhile, helped boost discretionary income for many people.
He also noted that no new casinos have been built in the area. “You haven’t had a ton of new supply coming in recently,” Bumazhny said.
That will change in 2018.



Friday, June 24, 2016

Vote no on 'predatory gambling' in Tiverton








  • Guest Opinion: Vote no on 'predatory gambling' in Tiverton


  • Here are 10 reasons to oppose the expansion of state-sponsored predatory gambling in Rhode Island.





    Thursday, May 5, 2016

    Massachusetts Gaming Update: Commission Rejects Application for Resort Casino in Brockton




    Massachusetts Gaming Update: Commission Rejects Application for Resort Casino in Brockton







    The wait is over and the decision is in. On Thursday, April 28, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission voted 4-1 against awarding a commercial license to Mass Gaming & Entertainment, LLC to build a resort casino in Brockton. After evaluations and deliberations, the Commission’s majority determined that Mass Gaming’s proposed plan did not meet expectations for a resort casino in Southeast Massachusetts, also known as “Region C.” In addition, the Commission found that competition between the proposed Brockton casino and the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe’s casino in Taunton might threaten successful gaming in Region C.
    The Commission evaluated and rated Mass Gaming’s proposal for a resort casino in terms of Finance, Economic Development, Building & Site Design, Mitigation, and General/Overview. The Commission found the proposed plan at least “sufficient” in four of the five categories, but ultimately decided the proposal was “insufficient” for its failure to demonstrate that it would be a “destination resort casino” rather than a “local convenience casino.”
    While the Commonwealth’s lone slot parlor has been operating in Plainville for just under a year, Massachusetts does not currently have an operating full-flown destination resort casino. The Commission has awarded licenses for commercial casinos in Springfield and Everett, but the development of those projects is still underway. If the Commission had also granted a commercial license to Mass Gaming, there would have been one slot parlor and four resort casinos in the state, including two resort casinos in Region C. While proponents for expanded gaming anticipate a strong customer base, four resort casinos may have been too ambitious without an existing baseline to measure customer growth for resort casinos.
    As a result of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe breaking ground for its First Light Resort & Casino on April 5, the Commission had to consider the consequences of having both a tribal casino and commercial casino in Region C—specifically, oversaturation of the resort casino market and the potential loss of revenue share under the Tribe’s compact with the Commonwealth. This potential loss of revenue share had to have factored significantly into the Commission’s decision.
    Under the terms of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe’s compact with Massachusetts, the state receives 17 percent of the tribe’s gaming revenues if the tribal casino is the only casino located in Region C. If, however, the tribal casino competes with a commercial casino in the region, then the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe does not have to pay any revenue share—zip, zero, zilch, nada—to the state. Consultants and commentators warned that the tribal casino would reinvest its tax savings to make its resort casino bigger and better and, ultimately, draw more customers and profits than a competing commercial casino. Evidently, the Commission agreed that, in a competition between a tribal casino and resort casino in Region C, the Commonwealth would be the hardest hit.
    This despite the pending lawsuit challenging the Department of the Interior’s decision to take land in trust for the benefit of the Tribe—the very decision which has allowed the Tribe to move forward with its plans to build a tribal casino in Taunton. But the Commission has stated that it could revisit the issue should the Tribe be unable to deliver the tribal casino that the Commission is expecting.



    Saturday, April 30, 2016

    Rejection of Brockton casino may not save Plainville's Plainridge in long term








    Rejection of Brockton casino may not save Plainville's Plainridge in long term



    Posted: Thursday, April 28, 2016 10:19 pm

    The Massachusetts Gaming Commission denied a proposal for a Brockton-based casino Thursday, eliminating a potential competitor in a gambling market growing increasingly crowded in Southeastern Massachusetts.
    But some gaming experts say Plainridge Park Casino in Plainville - so far, the state's only expanded gambling venue - may not be off the hook just yet.

    With larger casinos opening in Boston and nearby states, including a Native American-run resort in Taunton, one gambling expert said the prospect of Plainridge Park surviving more than a few years are pretty slim.
    "I would not be surprised if they closed in a couple of years," said Richard McGowan, a business professor and gambling expert at Boston College. "You're talking about a very small facility that is not all that exciting. It's got a lot of things working against it."
    The state's first casino, Plainridge Park opened last June debuting 1,250 slot machines, electronic table games and a seasonal horse-racing track.
    Geared toward older patrons, McGowan said state restrictions that limit the number of slot machines and prohibit table games puts Plainridge Park at a disadvantage to competing casinos in the area.
    Nearing its one-year anniversary, the parlor is on pace to generate about $100 million less than initial first-year estimates by the state.
    The Twin River Casino, 11 miles across the state line in Lincoln, R.I., is competition, McGowan said, with a larger venue with over 4,000 slot machines, 100 live table games and various other entertainment options.
    Last month, the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe also broke ground on a destination resort casino that will include nearly 3,000 slot machines, 150 table games and 40 poker tables, along with hotels, retail outlets and a family water park.
    With competing casinos on the rise around Plainridge, seven local legislators asked the state Gaming Commission last month to reject a new bid for a Brockton-based casino until gaming experts can study the effects of the Taunton complex on the region.
    The commission voted 4-1 Thursday against the Brockton casino, saying the bid did not meet the commission's standards.
    But revenue from Plainridge Park indicates it might already be suffering from existing competition.
    In 2015, Massachusetts officials estimated annual revenue of $262 million from Plainridge Park, but reduced that estimate to $207 million in October as the parlor faced declining profit. The next month, officials slashed the estimate to $160 million.
    With three months of operation left before completing its first full year of service, the park has brought in about $127 million in total revenue.
    Although falling revenues over the autumn and winter months sparked concern among state consultants, revenue has recently picked up with a monthly intake of $13.5 million in March - a trend Plainridge owner Penn National Gaming and some gaming experts have said is typical of newly opened casinos.
    "When they first opened you've got the curiosity factor, and I think people kind of extrapolated those first few weeks of revenues out indefinitely into the future," said Clyde Barrow, a former UMass Dartmouth professor who studies the casino industry. "But I don't think anybody thought they were going to sustain those numbers in the long term."
    Barrow said revenue at Plainridge Park follows trends expected for a casino of that size and match earlier expectations from 2011 that the parlor would generate $120 million to $140 million in its first year.
    "I think Plainridge is healthy," he said. "It's doing what it's intended to do, but at the end of the day, it is just a small slot parlor."
    But, McGowan said the monthly revenue shows Plainridge faces competition from Twin River Casino, which announced an anticipated $35 million increase in revenue last year. He said if Connecticut and Rhode Island cities move forward with their own casino bids, the Plainville parlor will have a hard time attracting customers outside of its local base.
    Making matters more difficult, gaming officials last year approved the 2018 opening of a large Everett casino backed by Las Vegas magnate Steve Wynn.
    "(Everett) is going to be the mecca of New England's gambling," McGowan said. "People who are really interested in casino gambling - that's where they really want to go. To think that people outside of (Plainville) are going to come to Plainridge, that's going to be very difficult. At best, they're going to be able to keep the people in their own area - and that's it."
    Still, gambling experts have said all along that Plainridge is a "convenience" venue meant to attract patrons within a 30-minute radius.
    Eric Schippers, vice president of public affairs at Penn National, which operates Plainridge Park, said the company is confident in the casino's future.
    "We remain focused on our marketing efforts and continue to work on building customer loyalty throughout the region," he said in an email statement.




    Wednesday, November 11, 2015

    Doubling down on a troubled industry





    Doubling down on a troubled industry




    Posted: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 11:00 am
    The initial proposals are in and the race is on to see which of four towns — Hartford, East Hartford, Windsor Locks, or East Windsor — gets to host the “convenience” casino the Mashantucket Pequots and Mohegans want to open in northern Connecticut.
    Advocates contend the proposed casino would help protect Connecticut casino revenue and jobs from MGM’s Springfield casino, generate municipal tax dollars, and spur local economic development. In short, they argue, the casino would be a windfall both for the state and the lucky town chosen to host it.  
    But would it? Or would it, in fact, entail doubling down on a declining state industry that comes with a mountain of economic and social problems that would far outweigh any benefits?
    The evidence suggests the latter.
    Economically, the Northeast’s growing casino glut is taking its toll, sharply reducing the inflow of out-of-state money that fueled Connecticut’s casino boom. The combined revenue for Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun is down 38 percent from its peak. The two casinos have eliminated a third of their jobs and have been replacing full-time jobs with part-time jobs to reduce wage costs and eliminate medical benefits. Foxwoods has stopped profit-sharing payments to its tribal owners and is mired in debt.
    The proposed convenience casino would slow the decline of Connecticut’s casino industry by helping to keep state gamblers in Connecticut, encouraging local gamblers to gamble more frequently, and expanding the market for casino gambling in greater Hartford.
    But the casino’s customer base would be heavily skewed to state residents, which would mean most of its revenue and jobs would be funded by the gambling losses of Connecticut people, resulting in simply redistributing money within the state and doing little to create any net new economic value.
    What the new casino would do, however, is increase a myriad of societal problems, including debt, bankruptcies, broken families, and crime. A 2009 state-sponsored study reported a steep increase in the number of Connecticut residents seeking treatment for gambling addiction following the arrival of Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun, while arrests for embezzlement soared by 400 percent, a rate of increase 10 times the national average. More recently, a Western Connecticut State University study revealed that violent crime increased in nearby towns after the casinos opened despite a sharp drop in violent crimes nationally and in Connecticut as a whole. According to the study’s author, interviews with local officials also indicated increases in prostitution and illicit drug use.
    Looking at the evidence nationally, the Institute for American Values, a nonpartisan think tank, concluded that casinos constitute a regressive tax that hits low-wage earners, minorities, and the elderly the hardest. In sum, the Institute found, the new regional and local casinos drain wealth from communities, weaken nearby businesses, hurt property values, and reduce civic participation, family stability, and other forms of social capital that are at the heart of a successful community.
    There is another reason to be concerned about the proposed casino.
    The tribes and their legislative allies originally proposed opening three convenience casinos. They backed off that proposal out of fear three couldn’t make it through the legislature all at once, but they are almost certain to revive the idea if they get the first one. Combined with the state’s decision to roll out the casino game keno to bars, restaurants, and convenience stores, the Hartford-area casino could be the first step in a massive expansion of casino-type gambling in the state.
    It is time to examine not only the economic and social impact of additional casinos, but the serious ethical questions involved in government promoting them.
    Multiple independent studies document that casinos obtain 35 percent to 50 percent of their revenue from problem gamblers — individuals with some level of gambling addiction. In other words, the casino industry’s business model is dependent upon preying on addicted gamblers, and up to half the money government obtains from casinos comes from exploiting addicted individuals and those around them.
    Does anyone really think that’s a formula for economic growth?
    Robert Steele is a former U.S. representative from Connecticut’s 2nd Congressional District and the author of “The Curse: Big-Time Gambling’s Seduction of a Small New England Town.” Tony Hwang is assistant leader of the state Senate’s Republican minority.



    Sunday, May 3, 2015

    Connecticut races downhill





    Hwang, church, civic leaders warn about casino expansion

    Monday, April 27, 2015

    No to Brockton casino



    The YouTube video below is of REVEL, the twice bankrupt Mega Monster in Atlantic City that CLOSED:






    Why would Massachusetts believe it is 'DIFFERENT' and exempt from the problems experienced elsewhere with Predatory Gambling?


    DONNA LEWIS, Brockton: No to Brockton casino

    Posted Apr. 27, 2015 at 12:01 AM
    Updated at 7:17 AM 



    I vote no for a casino in Brockton. I believe it will cause more violence, poverty and hungry, homeless children. Why bring another addiction into this already addicted city.
    Can't Mayor Bill Carpenter and other city officials figure another more productive way to bring revenue and jobs to Brockton? Ways to not encourage more crime?
    DONNA LEWIS
    Brockton
    http://www.enterprisenews.com/article/20150427/OPINION/304289999/1007/OPINION



    COLLEEN ROBERTS, Brockton: Casino isn’t the right solution for Brockton


    Posted Apr. 22, 2015 at 8:54 PM
    Updated Apr 22, 2015 at 8:57 PM 



    In regards to the proposed casino here in Brockton, I’d like to express my strong no vote (“Brockton casino proposal coming down to ‘yes’ or ‘no,’” April 15).
    I don’t believe a casino is the answer to the many needs the city of Brockton has. As residents of the city since 1983 and having raised our children here, my husband and I have a deep concern about the city’s future. The bright picture that the gaming company and Mayor Bill Carpenter are painting has a dark underbelly that will suck the life out of our city.
    When I was growing up in Omaha, Nebraska, at one point my family lived near a horse racing track. My father gambled, (mostly poker), but he also delved into the ponies. One payday he lost his entire check and we had an empty refrigerator. Imagine that happening thousands of times over when hardworking people hope for riches and end up in rags.
    The gaming company is out to make the owners wealthy, not the residents of Brockton and the surrounding towns. I believe that the cities and towns around casinos do not prosper and that gambling invites more crime. As if we don’t have enough drugs, gang activity, prostitution, murders and other crimes of our own to deal with! Our children and young people deserve better than this.
    The gaming company will promise the world to get a foothold in Brockton. I don’t believe the company will deliver on any of it. The casino will come, make its millions, and leave our city worse off.
    There is a better way to change our beloved Brockton into the kind of city families will flock to.



    http://www.patriotledger.com/article/20150422/OPINION/150428366/2014/OPINION



    Harrah's [now Caesars, the bankrupt disaster]] determined that 90% of their profits came from 10% of their patrons, a fact they have never disputed. 
    That's GAMBLING ADDICTION! 

    The Gambling Industry exists only by creating NEW Gambling Addicts. 

    Studies have determined that proximity increases GAMBLING ADDICTION - the closer a Slot Barn is to you, the more likely you'll GAMBLE, the more likely you or someone you know will become a GAMBLING ADDICT.


    When a public hearing was conducted in Raynham, no single person asked questions about Parx Gambling operation in Pennsylvania. 

    In 2011, I posted this: 
    Parx: The McDonald's of Gambling Addiction and Child Abandonment 

    Parx, an indistinguishable Slot Barn, has become the poster child for Child Abandonment..... 

    Parx is only casino with child-abandonment problem..... 

    "You said 150 to 200 times a year," he repeated. "That's three to four times a week, essentially." 

    "Yes," Jonas confirmed, most of his players fit that profile. In fact, because Parx players tend to live within 20 miles of Street Road, many go even more frequently. 

    "We have customers," Jonas boasted, "who give us $25, $30 five times a week." 

    At the end of the Yellow Brick Road, there is NO Wizard and no Magic Formula for politicians bereft of ideas who allow themselves to be dazzled by false promises