Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label Rep. Dan Winslow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rep. Dan Winslow. Show all posts

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Board’s a bad bet



Report: Board’s a bad bet

Predicts commission will run up nearly $20M deficit

By Dave Wedge
Saturday, December 1, 2012
 
Taxpayers could be walloped for up to $20 million a year to keep the state gaming board running by the time Massachusetts’ first casino opens for business, as slowpoke bureaucrats drag out the selection process and burn through their publicly funded startup money, a new report shows.

“Red tape and a culture of delay is killing our state and hurting [LOW WAGE] job creation,” fumed state Rep. Daniel B. Winslow, a Norfolk Republican. “We’ve got a lot riding on this.”

The Massachusetts Gaming Commission could be running at a $1.1 million deficit by next fiscal year, $12 million by 2015, and an eye-popping $19.8 million by 2016, as the board is not expected to even issue a casino license until 2014, according to a report by Spectrum Gaming, a state-hired consultant. Spectrum officials recommend in the report that the gaming panel go back to the Legislature for more funding to cover costs until casinos are “operating” — which may not be until 2016.

Casino expert Richard McGowan, a Boston College professor, blasted the commission for delays in the licensing process, as well as the board’s spending — including an October junket to Asia by MGC Chairman Stephen Crosby and another commissioner.



“There’s no reason why they can’t issue a license by the end of 2013,” McGowan said. “I don’t understand why it’s taking so long.”

MGC spokeswoman Elaine Driscoll downplayed the consultant’s report, saying the board expects to begin hauling in casino licensing fees of $85 million-plus by early 2014.

“The (report) simply presents a number of variables for the commission to consider,” Driscoll said.

“The commission fully anticipates to be generating fees from gaming applicants, which will provide the funding for commission operations. We remain on track to issue licenses by February 2014 with an effort toward condensing the process where possible.”




The Herald reported this week that New Hampshire lawmakers are aiming to approve a casino next year at Rockingham Park in Salem — and have it open before a shovel is even put in the ground in Massachusetts. Critics said a casino just over the state line could siphon off up to 40 percent of the Boston market and could drastically slash how much cash the Bay State gets from gaming. [How much Massachusetts $$$ is being siphoned because of the sales tax? How much revenue is lost to other states because travelers depart from other states?]




“They started after us and they’re going to finish before us,” Winslow said. “This is a cultural thing in Massachusetts government. And it’s the same story that any private sector developer will tell you is the way business has been done in Massachusetts for decades. The only difference is this is a high-profile public project.” 

There is no indication that Rep. Dan Winslow has ever created a job or worked in the private sector: Rep. Dan Winslow

News of the potential taxpayer hit comes as out-of-state casino bigwigs shake up the local landscape.

In Springfield, Ameristar pulled out of plans for a nearly $1 billion casino, citing a murky local approval process.

In Holyoke, Paper City Development has paid a $25,000 initial fee to the city as it launches plans for a casino at a golf course. And in Everett, Las Vegas tycoon Steve Wynn has asked to meet with the state gaming board to discuss the licensing process. Wynn is bidding to build a casino off Route 99 that would challenge Suffolk Downs in East Boston.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/politics/view.bg?articleid=1061178586&srvc=home&position=emailed

Friday, July 20, 2012

The inside story of gaming agency hire





The inside story of gaming agency hire

Emails indicate no “public relations hit” was foreseen


BY: Colman M Herman

The Massachusetts Gaming Commission hired Carl Stanley McGee as its interim executive director on May 1. McGee, a Harvard Law School graduate, former Rhodes Scholar, and Gov. Deval Patrick’s point person in crafting casino legislation as assistant secretary for policy and planning, was seen as a perfect fit for the job. The only question mark was a 2007 arrest for allegedly sexually molesting a 15-year-old boy at a Florida resort.

Stephen Crosby is the Chairman of the state Gaming Commission.
Internal commission emails indicate officials believed any “public relations hit” from the 2007 arrest would be minimal because they believed McGee, who was never prosecuted and later resumed his job in the Patrick administration, had been accused of a crime he did not commit.

“Based on all I know, this can be managed, and . . . the risk to the agency is small relative to the benefit of hiring such a perfectly suited person for this slot," wrote the commission’s outside public relations consultant, Karen Schwartzman, in an email to the commissioners on April 30.

Schwartzman added, "Bottom line: I believe that the media will mention [McGee's Florida] history, but I also believe that I can appeal to their sense of fairness in making clear that Stan has already been though the ringer for a crime he didn't commit and that it would be grossly unfair to put him through it again. I think it likely that the media will feel that they have to mention this, but I think it will be no more than a paragraph deep into an otherwise extremely favorable story about Stan and what it is that makes him a quality candidate for this job."

Commissioner James McHugh, a retired appeals court judge, emailed Schwartzman, who was being paid $150 an hour by the commission, to ask whether McGee had entered into a civil settlement of any kind with the boy’s family.

“Stan did indicate to me that there was indeed a settlement, though he didn’t say, and I didn’t ask, how much money was paid,” Schwartzman responded. “He did say it was not a big number, but that it made him sick to pay anything at all. He said that he was advised by counsel that it was in his interest to make a settlement so as to end the nightmare as expeditiously as possible.”

In a recent interview, Schwartzman conceded that her advice to the commission was misguided because she did not have complete information. “I relied on what the governor's office told us about the sexual allegations against Stan. They said they did their own review and let Stan come back to his state job after the charges were dropped,” she said. “A lot of new information came out later in the press that I was not aware of. If I knew all these things before, I likely would have done things differently.”

About 400 pages of internal emails involving McGee’s hiring were unearthed through a request under the state’s Public Records Law. Another 15 pages of documents were withheld in their entirety, with the commission claiming numerous exemptions from the law as well as attorney-client privilege.

Taken together, the documents provide a behind-the-scenes look at how a reliance on incomplete information can embroil an agency in a vortex of controversy.

In an April 23 email, Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby asked Sydney Asbury, Patrick’s deputy chief of staff, whether the governor’s office would have any objection to the commission hiring McGee as an interim executive director.

Asbury raised no red flags, other than a concern that McGee might be too closely tied to the governor. “I don’t have any immediate concerns with Stan’s candidacy,” Asbury said in her email response.

A day after McGee’s hiring by the commission at the same $121,000 salary he was making as assistant secretary for policy and planning, the Boston Globe began preparing a story on him that focused on the incident in Florida. When the Globe contacted the commission for comment, Schwartzman responded: “For what it's worth and off the record, I think the Globe's decision to report the family's point of view or Wendy Murphy's [the family’s lawyer] view -- in the face of the facts which boil down to the lead prosecutor in [Florida] investigating thoroughly and finding no basis to bring charges -- is both irresponsible journalism and grossly unfair to Stan McGee."

But the Globe story, under the headline "Sex assault case haunts gambling director," revealed information Schwartzman had not been aware of. The article reported that the boy’s parents had complained to the Florida governor’s office about the state attorney dropping the case. That complaint prompted a review of the situation by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, which recommended that the state attorney reconsider.

“I have been in law enforcement for over 34 years and investigated crimes against children exclusively for the past 25 years,” Inspector Terry Thomas of the state’s Crimes Against Children Unit wrote, according to the Globe. “And I have seen cases successfully prosecuted with less evidence than this case appears to have.”

Thomas recommended, according to the Globe, that the state attorney reconsider the prosecution of McGee for sexual battery and add in the offense of lewd and lascivious behavior. The state attorney declined.

Kathleen Norbut, the former president of United to Stop Slots in Massachusetts, complained in a May 3 email to Crosby about the hiring of McGee. “McGee? PR nightmare,” she wrote to him. “ I’ll be blunt. The GC did not get that one right. . . . I don’t think that this will be brushed aside.”

Crosby disagreed. In a response to Norbut, he wrote: “What we know is that the state attorney in Florida concluded that there was no corroborating evidence to the allegation to bring a charge. End of story. . . . We are lucky to have him.” A May 4 story in the Cape Cod Times reported that Crosby referred several times to McGee as a “superstar,” adding that the allegations against him were “wholly unsubstantiated” and have “zero substance."

On May 6, Schwartzman learned from a Globe article that, according to unnamed officials familiar with McGee’s employment history, the Patrick administration never conducted its own internal investigation of the Florida charges and instead relied on the findings of the Florida prosecutor. The Globe report was subsequently confirmed by the Patrick administration.

When Republican Rep. Daniel Winslow said he planned to hire a private investigator to investigate the Florida incident, McGee decided to call it quits. On May 9 – just eight days after he was hired as the gambling commission’s interim executive director and after only three days on the job – McGee abruptly quit.

Two days later, Patrick said he would welcome McGee back to his administration. “He is a very, very strong, very able, high-contributing member of our team, and I hope he will come back,” the Cape Cod Times quoted Patrick as saying.

But despite having Patrick’s public support, McGee never returned. After taking a leave of absence, he resigned from the Patrick administration in June.

http://www.commonwealthmagazine.org/News-and-Features/Online-exclusives/2012/Summer/003-The-inside-story-of-McGees-hiring.aspx

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Winslow leaving unanswered questions




Thursday, May 10, 2012

Existing in an Ivory Tower

Watching those who have isolated themselves, receive 6 figure taxpayer funded incomes along with taxpayer funded pensions and seek to suck the last discretionary dollar from the poor on the pretense that cleaning toilets for minimum wage is a future, the unfolding saga of Stan McGee defines the bone-headed decisions.

Guaranteed any agreement negotiated with the Mashpee Wampanoags will not serve the Commonwealth well.

The veneer of pretense slips to clearly reveal the pretense.




In addition to being the Governor's "point man" on developing the casino legislation, including the carve out for Indian gaming preference in SE Mass, he has been the lead person negotiating the compact with the Mashpee Wampanoag on behalf of the Governor - as noted in the paper just the other day that when he moved over to the Commission he was removed from that role... George Brennan is the only one I know who caught that tid-bit.

http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120508/NEWS/205080334/0/rss04

"Jason Lefferts, a spokesman for the state Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development, said Friday that McGee is being removed from negotiations with the Mashpee Wampanoag on a tribe-state compact, even though McGee expressed an interest in staying in that role. Lefferts said he was not sure when that decision was made by the Patrick administration."

Now that McGee is back in his job, it's not clear if he goes back to the negotiating tables with the tribe or not - regardless, he was the architect of the compact (likely already close to completion) and as such it should be thrown out if he continues to decline to disclose what happened, state on the record that he didn't molest that child (he's never actually denied it) and prove that neither he nor anyone else in the Governor's office used their political influence to get the Florida charges against him dropped when the arresting officers, state sex crime investigators and victim's family all wanted the prosecution to go forward.

http://wampaleaks.blogspot.com/2012/05/inconvenient-distractions-for.html

Thursday, May 10, 2012


Inconvenient “distractions” for the Massachusetts Gaming Commission

UPDATE: McGee resigns from gaming post



BOSTON – Stan McGee’s controversial tenure as the interim executive director of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission is over after three days on the job.

McGee resigned Wednesday night amid growing controversy over his appointment that included protests from child advocates and legislators. McGee was accused, but never charged, in 2007 in an alleged sexual assault on a 15-year-old boy at a Florida resort. In 2011, he reached a confidential settlement with the boy’s family.

“After much personal thought and given the growing distractions, I have decided that I cannot be effective in the job I was offered,” McGee said in a prepared statement released by the commission’s spokeswoman. “In order to allow the commission to get on with the important public business of job creation and economic development it was created to perform, I respectfully decline the offer that was extended to me to serve as acting executive director.”

Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby accepted McGee’s resignation, though he again praised the casino expertise he would have brought to the table. “In the interest of maintaining public confidence in the achievement of our mission, however, I concur with (McGee) that his serving in this role would impede the commission’s ability to accomplish its mission,” Crosby said in his prepared statement.

McGee’s announcement came after another day of public outcry over his appointment and a perception that the commission failed to do its due diligence.

McGee, a former Rhodes Scholar and a graduate of Harvard Law School, was the administration’s expert on Indian gaming laws in the state Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development. He helped craft Patrick’s casino legislation in 2007.

Crosby referred to McGee repeatedly over the past week as a “superstar.”

McGee did not respond to an email seeking further comment.

Just hours before the resignation, the governor’s office confirmed it never did an independent review of the sexual assault allegations against McGee. That contradicts comments made by Crosby on multiple occasions following McGee’s appointment by a unanimous vote of the commission May 1.
“This office does not conduct independent criminal investigations and did not conduct an investigation of this case,” Kimberly Haberlin, a spokeswoman for Gov. Deval Patrick, said in an email. “Law enforcement officials investigated the claims and decided not to press charges. As (McGee) was never charged with a crime, he was allowed to return from his leave of absence after that decision.”

As recently as Monday, in a letter to a state representative who raised questions about McGee’s hiring, Crosby wrote that the commission was satisfied that McGee was presumed innocent, in part, because of a review done by Patrick’s office. That letter came one day after The Boston Globe quoted unnamed sources saying no such review by Patrick’s office ever occurred.

Reached Wednesday night, Karen Schwartzman, a spokeswoman for Crosby and the commission, had no immediate comment on the conflicting information.

Criticism of Crosby, specifically, and the commission, in general, had increased in recent days after Crosby acknowledged in published reports that his vetting process included reading press accounts of the case, but not interviews with prosecutors or anyone else involved in the case other than McGee.
Wednesday was a day of fast-paced developments that stemmed from the controversy.

At mid-day, state Rep. Daniel Winslow, R-Norfolk, announced that he had hired a private investigator to do an independent probe into McGee and his hiring. About an hour later, led by the Republican caucus, the full House approved an amendment calling for more thorough background checks of gaming commission employees.

“The commission’s failure to conduct due diligence in these circumstances is unacceptable and inexcusable,” Winslow said.

Reached Wednesday night by phone, Winslow said he still has concerns about McGee working in state government and said he is hopeful the Patrick administration will review the case before he is reinstated. McGee is expected to rejoin the state Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development, which had loaned him to the gaming commission, according to Statehouse source familiar with the case.

At a Statehouse press conference Wednesday, Winslow said he planned to use campaign funds and donations to pay a retired state police detective $5,000 to do an independent investigation that he would share with the commission and Patrick.

Winslow, who provided copies of the civil complaint, referred to the detailed, graphic nature of the allegations, contained in the lawsuit, as “heartbreaking.” The Times has decided not to publish the sex acts alleged.

Winslow hired Robert Long, an investigator noted for his surveillance work against James “Whitey” Bulger, to travel to Florida and delve into the allegations – due diligence he said the gaming commission should have done.

A handful of state representatives stood with Winslow in a show of support.

Earlier in the week, Winslow had tried to convince the commission to hold off on McGee’s appointment until it could conduct an independent investigation. Crosby refused and, in a letter to Winslow, wrote that the commission has no investigators and McGee is presumed innocent.

Those comments prompted child sex abuse advocates to criticize Crosby and the commission and to call on McGee to unseal the confidential agreement he reached to settle a lawsuit brought by the boy’s family.

Though some described the hiring of Long as “political grandstanding,” Winslow, former legal counsel to Gov. Mitt Romney and a former district court judge, disputed that there is any partisanship at play.

“Voters sent me here to be a voice and a conscience and that’s what I have brought every day I have been a representative,” said Winslow, a first-term representative who voted in favor of the legislation authorizing three casinos and a slot parlor in the Bay State. “When something is not right, even if I don’t have the power to change it, I do have the power to say something.”

About an hour after Winslow’s press conference, the full House approved an amendment to a spending bill calling for more thorough background checks that avoid the appearance of impropriety. “The original gaming law outlined a reasonable and appropriate vetting procedure, but apparently that wasn’t enough. It is unfortunate that the House of Representatives now has to legislate common sense,” House Minority Leader Bradley Jones said in a prepared statement.

The amendment passed by a voice vote and is the clearest indication yet that confidence in the five-member commission is diminished. “I agree this standard is reasonable and necessary, given the demonstrated lack of due diligence with the commission’s first hiring of a key player,” State Rep. Randy Hunt, R-Sandwich, wrote in an email after the vote.

House Republicans also called into question hiring a Patrick administration insider even for a temporary job with the gaming commission. Hunt called it a “conflict of interest” that is unacceptable for an independent authority.

Because the commission is the most powerful agency in Massachusetts, it needs to be above reproach, Winslow said. “It’s important that it be independent, that it be free from the sway of politics and because of that it’s that much more important that there be complete confidence in the integrity of the people appointed to the senior management positions.”




State rep hires private investigator to review allegations against director of gaming commission

Stan McGee steps aside





Interim chief of gaming agency declines job offer

By Associated Press
Associated Press / May 9, 2012   
 
BOSTON—The interim executive director of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission declined an offer Wednesday to serve as acting executive director over an old allegation of child sexual abuse.
Carl Stanley McGee told Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby that he cannot be effective in the job and wants to allow the commission to do its work.
"After much personal thought and given the growing distractions, I have decided that I cannot be effective in the job I was offered," he said.
Crosby responded that if McGee accepted the job, he would impede the commission work, citing "the interest of maintaining public confidence" in the commission's work.
State Rep. Daniel Winslow, R-Norfolk, said earlier that a former state police detective will examine the initial charges against McGee and deliver a report to the commission and to Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick.
Winslow said it's unacceptable that the commission didn't conduct its own investigation.
"The core function of the gaming commission is due diligence," Winslow said at a Statehouse press conference. "Due diligence starts at home."
Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby said the panel knew McGee had been accused of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old boy in the steam room of a Florida resort in 2007.
But Crosby said the commission felt comfortable hiring McGee because Florida prosecutors determined no evidence corroborated the allegation and criminal charges were dropped.
McGee, who began working for the commission this week, was asked Tuesday at a meeting about the abuse accusation, and he told reporters, "No comment."
Karen Schwartzman, a commission spokeswoman, said that when the organization voted to extend the offer to McGee to be interim executive director, it was clear that the appointment was subject to a background check. She said every other commission hire would be subject to the same background check.
McGee won't be placed on the commission payroll until the review is completed, Schwartzman said.
Winslow said his investigation should take a few weeks and cost about $5,000. Winslow said he will pay for the probe, but he'll also take the unusual step of asking for donations from the public to help cover the cost of the investigation.
"After the report is prepared, I will again ask the gaming commission and the governor to review the findings and to take whatever action is appropriate," Winslow said.
Also Wednesday, Winslow's fellow Republican lawmakers successfully pushed the House to adopt an amendment requiring stricter candidate review procedures, including mandatory background checks, for everyone applying for a job with the gaming commission.
"The original gaming law outlined a reasonable and appropriate vetting procedure, but apparently that wasn't enough," said House Republican Leader Brad Jones of North Reading.
The amendment also requires that the commission "strive to avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety" in all matters.
Winslow said the state law that created the gaming commission requires the panel to file its own code of ethics with the state Ethics Commission intended to go above and beyond the state's existing conflict of interest and financial reporting rules.
This week, a child advocacy group called on McGee to waive the confidentiality agreement from a settlement in a lawsuit filed by the 15-year-old boy's family. The Massachusetts Citizens for Children said the gaming commission has a duty to ask McGee to disclose terms of the settlement.
McGee and Crosby had no comment on the request.
The gaming commission has sweeping powers to enforce the casino law, including awarding the highly coveted licenses for the three casinos and single slots parlor proposed in the law.
He previously said the panel knew McGee had been accused of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old boy in the steam room of a Florida resort in 2007. Crosby said the commission felt comfortable hiring McGee because Florida prosecutors determined no evidence corroborated the allegation and criminal charges were dropped.
McGee, who began working for the commission this week, said `No comment" when asked Tuesday about the accusation.

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Big mistake by Massachusetts Gambling Commission defies logic



Defying critics, gambling panel seats McGee

Crosby defends ‘presumption of innocence’ of hire

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Bankrupt yourself from home! Thanks Rep. Winslow!

Coming to Massachusetts - Bankrupting ourselves from our home or office!



HAND: Winslow antes up on poker

Friday, January 27, 2012

“mad at every level”

Grab a seat and watch the unfolding of backroom deals and political corruption crafted on Beacon Hill to subsidize the Kraft/Wynn deal in Foxborough at the expense of Massachusetts taxpayers.

Transportation heads: Gillette rail plan through Walpole 'not a focus'.
By Veronica Hamlett and Dave Eisenstadter
Walpole Times


WALPOLE — The MBTA is still mum on any plans to increase commuter rail service to Foxboro via Medfield and Walpole.

In the midst of a $161 million budget and the possibility of increasing fares and reducing services, Transportation Secretary Richard Davey and MBTA acting general manager Jonathan Davis said at a Wicked Local editorial board meeting last Friday that their focus is on current projects and contracts, even though customers are calling for more.

“The MBTA has a problem that every company in America would want in that customers want more of us but we can’t deliver,” Davey said. “People want more or expanded service.”

The MBTA is working on securing a new contract for its current commuter rail services. Its contract with Massachusetts Bay Commuter Rail expires in June. Davis said the MBTA could entertain talks with a private entity willing to expand service.

“Thinking of longer term projects, perhaps we could give the opportunity to whoever the service provider is to invest their own capital and experience,” he said.

The Green Line extension to Tufts University and a South Coast rail line will continue as planned, as both are state obligations as part of the Big Dig, but neither will be paid for by the MBTA, according to Davis.

Worcester-based law firm Mirick O’Connell drafted a proposal for regular rail service from Boston to Foxboro on the Franklin line through Medfield and Walpole. The pilot program would still operate at a deficit of $1.4 million.

Local legislators are trying to prevent said expansion by amending the state budget. The senate passed an amendment last Friday 31-3 prohibiting the MBTA from expanding capital projects that would operate at a fiscal deficit. It also requires the MBTA to do a cost analysis study for any and all rail service expansion and to not proceed if the results come back unprofitable.

“This is an extremely important issue to Walpole and for the Commonwealth as a whole,” Sen. Jim Timilty (D-Walpole) said in a statement. “I share the concerns of an overwhelming number of constituents who have contacted me for months now, urging that we act appropriately on this matter. This is an issue of fiscal prudence, and it has to happen in a timely manner so that we do not add another generation of debt to our public transportation.”

Davis would not comment on the new legislation, which must now earn House approval.


“We’re committed to the green line and to South Coast rail and will not add to the debt burden the MBTA currently carries,” he said.

The MBTA is considering two proposals with different levels of fare increases and service reductions to close its $161 million budget gap. The first scenario would eliminate 60 bus routes and increase fares by an average of 43 percent. The second eliminates more than 200 bus routes, reduces the length of 11 others and would increase fares by an average of 35 percent.

The second plan eliminates the 34E bus from Walpole to Dedham.

Both plans discontinue all ferry routes, suspend all weekend trains and service after 10 p.m. on commuter rails and eliminate weekend service on the Mattapan line and Green Line E branch.

Neither plan is inevitable, but are instead being proposed to gauge what level of fare increases or service reductions customers are willing to endure, Davis said. The most drastic estimates predict a 17 percent reduction in ridership, or 94 million rides annually.

A series of public hearings are being held to gather feedback about the two proposals, including one in Framingham on Tuesday, Feb. 14 at Town Hall, from 6 to 8 p.m.

Read more: Transportation heads: Gillette rail plan through Walpole 'not a focus' - Walpole, MA - Wicked Local Walpole http://www.wickedlocal.com/walpole/news/x1672347278/Transportation-heads-Gillette-rail-plan-through-Walpole-not-a-focus#ixzz1khAtwi7Q




State Sen. Timilty rails against expanded train service in MetroWest
Senator Timilty talks about plans to expand the rail lines.

By Marc Filippino/Correspondent
Wicked Local Walpole
Posted Dec 23, 2011


WALPOLE — State Senator James Timilty is “mad at every level” at plans for a proposed commuter rail that would run through his home town of Walpole, and is looking to do everything in his power to stop it.

Timilty led a small group of reporters on a walk of the rail line near the South Walpole Post Office on Summer Street Tuesday. Along the way, he ripped the MBTA for its history of debt and questioned its ability to responsibly manage the finances of a proposed commuter rail expansion into Foxborough, Walpole, Medfield and throughout the MetroWest region.

Timilty cited a proposed pilot project’s projected $4 million annual operating loss as a sign that the project is doomed to fail.

“If [the MBTA] were a private sector agency, they’d fire everybody,” Timilty said. “30 percent of their operating budget goes to debt, and they’re thinking of spending upwards of $10 million to activate a line? They have some monumental challenges they need to deal with now.

“We were the first subway in America, and in an urban setting, we’re probably the worst,” he said. “Their systems are old and faulty, and if you’ve ever gone through Park Street, it’s a disaster.”

The controversy began in October when the Westborough-based law firm Mirick O’Connell proposed a pilot commuter rail expansion project, dubbed the 495 Rail Study, that focused on enhancing train service to Foxborough. The pilot program called for utilizing existing rail equipment, while seeing whether a long-term plan was feasible.

Walpole residents were immediately up in arms. Walpole is where the Foxborough spur splits off from the Franklin Line, and residents opposed having to bear the brunt of the constant noise from a high-speed train and the construction that would be associated with building a new rail line and station. Town officials even contacted John Mirick to register their complaints.

On Dec. 2, in a strongly worded letter to Jody Ray, director of railroad operations for the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Rep. Dan Winslow objected to expanded commuter rail service to Foxborough on the grounds that it was a taxpayer giveaway to billionaire casino gambling interests.

Winslow called for a halt to any further discussions or planning until the impacts on surrounding towns of such a service increase could be assessed, and warned, “Not one thin dime of limited public money should be spent for the private benefit of billionaires in a private transaction.”


Timilty objected not only to the Foxborough pilot project, but to the entire notion of explanded commuter rail service in the MetroWest area.

He sees the plan becoming dangerously long-term and compared commuter rail expansion to the problems that plagued the “Big Dig” project in Boston, but on a smaller scale. The pilot project alone would cost an estimated $84 million, with $6 million more annually to operate it, according to the MBTA’s 2010 Foxborough Commuter Feasibility Study Report.

With projected stops in several Norfolk County towns including Medfield, Timilty said the construction would devastate local property values, repel businesses from the area, and damage the overall quality of life.

“The American dream is have control over your own property, and for the state to take it for the greater good, there needs to be a significant cause for that,” Timilty said, referring to the possibility that Massachusetts would acquire land needed for the expansion through eminent domain.

“I have to see what happens to these communities when you have these trains,” he said. “It’s not what we need and it’s not what we can afford.”

Currently in Walpole, freight trains traverse a one-track, north-south rail twice daily. Timilty sees this single track turning into a double track, which would bring the 40-mile-per-hour commuter rail through Walpole 16 times a day, disrupting residential areas and small businesses.

Brickman Group Landscaping is located on Summer Street in Walpole, no more than 25 yards from the tracks.

Kelly Page, an employee at Brickman, said she understands the usefulness of commuter rail, since all Brickman employees must now commute by car. But she also understands the frustration of Walpole citizens. When she was living at home in Northbridge, she said, nearby train traffic disrupted the household several times a day.

“When you have a property right next to a railroad,” she said, “it’s extremely annoying, especially if you have small kids and you’re trying to get them to go to bed at night. My daughter was only five years old when the railroad was going through Northbridge and that was only a couple of times a day.

“It was loud and it shook the entire neighborhood. We had cracks in the walls and cracks in the ceilings and damage to the house, so I can see why residents would not want it.”

Still others are not as stridently opposed to expanding commuter service as Timilty.


“The MBTA has been discussing this for a number of years,” said Paul Matthew, executive director of the 495/MetroWest Partnership, a public-private collaborative that encourages development in the region. Mirick O’Connell brought the 495 Rail Study to Matthew’s group for feedback and regional input while it was being developed.

Matthew said the casino issue raised by Winslow is a red herring. “I think the discussion started long before the casino proposal and will continue long after the casino proposal,” he said. He also said casinos usually attract a more affluent crowd, which is not dependent on public transportation.
[but the low wage workers are dependent on less expensive public transportation at great cost to Massachusetts taxpayers]

Matthew said this public discussion is good for the community, since towns such as Walpole will be affected the most. However, he noted the outlines in the pilot program are not permanent, and that it will take decades before the 495 Rail Study is likely to become a reality.

Timilty put it more bluntly.

“It’s a pie in the sky idea,” he said. “If it was built 50 years down the road, it may not have any impact, but right now? Can we afford it? Is it necessary? On both accounts, I offer the most vehement ‘no’ I can get out.”


Read more: State Sen. Timilty rails against expanded train service in MetroWest - Walpole, MA - Wicked Local Walpole
http://www.wickedlocal.com/walpole/news/x1980198478/State-Sen-Timilty-rails-against-expanded-train-service-in-MetroWest#ixzz1khBza7Mh

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Trustworthiness? The Oxymoron of Gambling

Who do you trust?
By Herald Staff

Who do you trust most: Robert Kraft, Scott Harshbarger or Cardinal Sean O’Malley?

In phone surveys this week, Foxboro residents have been asked to rate the believability of casino statements based on who’s uttering them.

The Herald reported earlier this week that Vegas-based Wynn Resorts, which has eyes on building a resort casino across from Gillette Stadium, has hired a firm to conduct phone polling of the town.

It’s unclear who’s behind the trustworthiness calls. But survey takers are reporting they’re being asked to describe how much stock they put in statements from Kraft, Harshbarger, O’Malley, state Rep. Dan Winslow, Foxboro selectmen, a hypothetical representative from Mothers Against Drunk Driving and recovering substance-abuse patients.

Meanwhile, selectmen are slated to hold a key casino meeting Tuesday night as the town prepares for a possible face-to-face town forum with Kraft and Vegas mogul Steve Wynn next month.

The Desperation of George Carney:

Slots to fill

Raynham Park owner George Carney, who had been in talks with the corporation that owns the Boston Bruins [team stats] and TD Garden for a potential slots parlor, said this week a deal between the two is unlikely.

Buffalo, N.Y.-based Delaware North, which bought an Illinois casino last year and is run by Bruins hotshot Jeremy Jacobs, had been in contact with Carney’s track about a possible collaboration for the state’s lone slots parlor license a few months ago.

Since then, however, Carney told the Herald the two have gone their separate ways.

A Delaware North spokeswoman did not return a call for comment.

Meanwhile, Carney said he still has a number of partners for his proposed slots parlor and plans to announce something over the next few weeks.