Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label sovereign immunity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sovereign immunity. Show all posts

Thursday, June 30, 2016

Supreme Court won’t hear Tribe’s case






Supreme Court won’t hear Tribe’s case


By Susan Field

Matthew L.M. Fletcher isn’t surprised that the United States Supreme Court has declined to hear a case involving dispute between Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe and the National Labor Relations Board.
Following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, there was a significant chance of a 4-4 tie, according to Fletcher, a professor of law and director of the Indigenous Law and Policy Center at Michigan State University.
Saginaw Chippewa tribal officials have battled the NLRB for years over employee efforts to unionize – allowed under federal law but banned by the Tribe, and Tribal officials had asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in which judges ruled that casinos in Michigan run by Native tribes can’t stop employees from petitioning others in the workplace to form unions.
Fletcher, who has closely followed the case, said the Tribe will likely start to negotiate with labor organizations and the NLRB going into the future.

He also said it’s possible the Tribe could exercise the treaty right it claims to exclude and have a “showdown” with the NLRB.
However, Fletcher said he is highly doubtful that the price of exercising that treaty right, which might mean shutting down the Soaring Eagle Casino and Resort for a time, would be worth the fight.
Supreme Court justices on Monday declined to “wade into the legal battle putting Native American tribal sovereignty against the federal government’s power to regulate labor relations in cases involving casinos on Indian land in Michigan,” according to the news agency Reuters.
Rulings by the appeals court gave the NLRB authority over casinos on Indian land.
Now that the Supreme Court has declined to take up the issue, Reuters reported, the Republican-led Congress stands as the tribes’ best hope of avoiding NLRB jurisdiction.
The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill in November to strip the NLRB’s authority over tribal business on Indian lands, but that has stalled in the Senate, according to Reuters.
That means tribes must abide by the two decisions from the Cincinnati-based federal Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, Reuters reported.
Last year, that court ruled that the NLRB could order the Soaring Eagle to reinstate a housekeeper who was fired for soliciting union support.
That employee, Susan Lewis, is thrilled for her former co-workers.
Lewis, who got work at an Alma manufacturing business shortly after being fired from the casino, was never re-hired and said she would not return to the job now because the work environment would be hostile.
“But if I did, I’d do the same thing all over again,” Lewis said.
Three California Native American associations filed official support for the Tribe in its fight against the NLRB earlier this year.
Tribal public relations officials did not respond to a request for comment.



Saturday, January 9, 2016

Here ya go Taunton!


Check out: 

REELWAMPS





Federal Government Designates Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Lands As A Reservation


MASHPEE – The federal government has officially designated the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe’s lands as a reservation, the final hurdle needed before the tribe begins their $500 million resort casino project in Taunton.
The declaration was published today in the federal register by the U.S. Department of the Interior, two months after land in both Taunton and Mashpee was placed into trust by the federal government on behalf of the tribe. The tribe has 321 acres in both towns under its control.
“This cements our right to self-determination now and for future generations,” said Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council Chairman Cedric Cromwell. “After decades of painstaking work, we are overjoyed the government of the United States has officially issued this reservation proclamation, as we are witnessing the re-birth of our nation.”
The proclamation establishes a land base for tribal self-government under federal law. The tribe has come to Mutual Aid Agreements with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the City of Taunton. Tribal officials say the move also means they can move forward with immediate infrastructure in Mashpee, including the establishment of emergency services on Tribal lands.
Tribal leaders are also working on a Mutual Aid Agreement with the Barnstable County Sheriff’s Office to establish dispatch services, a holding cell, and a booking room.
“Re-establishing sovereignty and building a modern nation is no small task,” said Cromwell. “In addition to establishing formal relationships with state and municipal agencies in relation to emergency services, we’ve also adopted a body of criminal law that essentially mirrors state law. Working in conjunction with our Tribal court system, tribal law will be enforced by recently deputized tribal police officers, each of whom has extensive law enforcement experience.”
The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe has approximately 2,600 citizens.
The tribe was federally recognized in 2007. Federally recognized Native American tribes are allowed to build casinos on native land, or land that has been taken into federal trust.
The 2011 law that legalized casino gambling in Massachusetts provided for a casino in eastern and western Massachusetts, a slots-only casino, and a casino set-aside for a federally recognized Native American tribe.
The state’s gaming commission has also been considering the possibility of issuing another commercial casino license for southeastern Massachusetts.
MGM Resorts is planning a casino for Springfield, while Wynn Resorts is looking to build a gaming resort in Everett. The slots-only casino has already opened in Plainville.
By Matt McCarthy, CapeCod.com Newscenter
http://www.capecod.com/newscenter/federal-government-designates-mashpee-wampanoag-tribal-lands-as-a-reservation/



Feds place Mashpee Wampanoag tribal lands in trust, paving the way for Taunton casino

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS  
January 08, 2016


MASHPEE, Massachusetts — The federal government has placed Mashpee Wampanoag tribal lands in trust as a reservation, paving the way for the Cape Cod tribe to begin construction of a casino in Taunton.

The U.S. Department of Interior's designation was published in the federal register on Friday, less than two months after the Wampanoags transferred formal ownership of approximately 321 acres of lands in Mashpee and Taunton to the federal government to be held in trust.

Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council Chairman Cedric Cromwell said in a statement the designation "cements our right to self-determination now and for future generations."

In addition to reaffirming the tribe's intent to build a resort casino, Cromwell says the move also allows the Wampanoags to establish public safety services on tribal lands.



Thursday, July 23, 2015

Workers’ Rights Stripped at Indian-run Casinos and Other Tribal Enterprises by Anti-Labor Bill






Workers’ Rights Stripped at Indian-run Casinos and Other Tribal Enterprises by Anti-Labor Bill

Jul 22, 2015
 
WASHINGTON — Today the Committee on Education and the Workforce reported H.R. 511, the “Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act of 2015,” legislation that would strip hundreds of thousands of workers employed at Indian-owned tribal enterprises—such as casinos—of their voice in the workplace and the protections under the National Labor Relations Act.  Although tribal casinos employ upwards of 600,000 people, approximately 75 percent of the employees are non-Indians.  
 
This legislation would override National Labor Relations Board policy—which has been upheld by numerous courts—that balances the rights of workers with the interests of Indian tribes to protect their intramural governance and treaty rights. By stripping the NLRB of jurisdiction, this legislation creates economic uncertainty for workers where labor agreements are in effect at Indian-owned enterprises, while eviscerating the legal basis for established bargaining relationships and obliterating tribes’ duty to bargain in good faith when contracts expire.
 
“There is no principled basis for excluding hundreds of thousands of workers from coverage under our nation’s labor laws just because they happen to work on tribal lands,” said Ranking Member Bobby Scott.“Tribes must comply with the requirements of laws of general applicability, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, among other federal workplace laws. This bill singles out the National Labor Relations Act, and promotes actions that would diminish the standard of living for workers employed in tribal enterprises. ”
 
By depriving workers of the right to organize and bargain collectively, this bill establishes a double standard.  As a member of the International Labor Organization, the United States government is obligated to respect and promote four core rights outlined in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, including the freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining. 
 
Democratic and Republican Administrations have insisted that our trading partners abide by and enforce these basic labor rights, and Congress has repeatedly ratified these obligations in free trade agreements. But today, this Committee voted on a bill that does just the opposite for American workers at tribal enterprises.  
 
Tribal gaming is big business. In 2013, there were 449 tribal casinos in 28 states, which earned more than $28 billion in revenues. An estimated 43 percent of all U.S. gaming is tribally-owned. While gaming jobs have historically paid low wages, unionized gaming jobs have provided a pathway to the middle class for workers, with good wages and benefits.
 
According to a study conducted by UNITE Here, when both wages and health insurance costs are taken into account, tribal casino workers with a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) earn more than the industry average. For example, in California workers with a CBA earn on average $7,558 more per year. That same study lists more than 10,000 workers as being covered by collective bargaining agreements in that state. It found that nearly half of the children of hotel casino workers without a collective bargaining agreement are eligible for Medical Cal. California would save $490 million in health care costs over 10 years if casino workers were insured at the same rate as those who are members of a union.   
 
At issue in the legislation are two competing principles: the rights that Indian tribes possess as distinct, independent political communities, retaining their original natural rights in matters of local self-government, and the rights of workers to organize, bargain collectively, and exercise their right to freedom of association.  
 
Rather than attempting to reconcile these two important principles, the Majority advanced H.R. 511, which, according to the Congressional Budget Office, will eliminate the federal right of employees to join together to improve working conditions and will suppress wages.
 
Click here to find letters in opposition to H.R. 511 from the Communications Workers of America, theUnited Steelworkers and the AFL-CIO.
 
###
 

Downloads




http://democrats.edworkforce.house.gov/press-release/workers%E2%80%99-rights-stripped-indian-run-casinos-and-other-tribal-enterprises-anti-labor

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Tribal casinos, protected by sovereign immunity, face challenges from gamblers claiming abuse



Tribal casinos, protected by sovereign immunity, face challenges from gamblers claiming abuse

The Associated Press
FILE - In this June 29, 2006, file photo, a table game area is reflected on a ceiling mirror in Foxwoods Resort Casino on the Mashantucket Pequot Indian Reservation in Mashantucket, Conn. Lawsuits making their way through federal courts are testing the principle of sovereign immunity when it comes to abuse claims at tribal casinos. So-called “advantage players” are made to feel unwelcome, regularly being tossed and and blacklisted. But gamblers have limited options to press claims of mistreatment at Native American-owned properties, which generally are shielded from lawsuits in outside courts by laws recognizing tribes’ sovereignty (AP Photo/Chitose Suzuki, File) 




By MICHAEL MELIA, Associated Press
MASHANTUCKET, Conn. (AP) — For gamblers skilled at counting cards, it can be especially risky to play at America's tribal casinos: Those who have gotten caught tell stories of seized winnings, wrongful detentions, or worse.
Casino bosses everywhere have ways of making so-called "advantage players" feel unwelcome, regularly tossing and blacklisting them. But gamblers have limited options to press claims of mistreatment at Native American-owned properties, which generally are shielded from lawsuits in outside courts by laws recognizing tribes' sovereignty.
Now, a pair of lawsuits in federal courts is testing the principle of tribal immunity in cases involving allegations of abuse and bias in tribal justice systems.
The cases, in Connecticut and Arizona, involve crackdowns on advantage players who say they use card-counting or other methods that shift the odds in their favor, but generally are not illegal.
"You do not have a level playing field," said Stanford Wong, a Las Vegas-based gambling expert who advises readers of his newsletters to be aware that tribal properties are governed by their own laws. "In a tribal casino, there's no recourse whatsoever. You can't sue them in regular court. The odds are all stacked against you."
At the country's largest Indian casino, Foxwoods in southeastern Connecticut, three gamblers from China claim the casino wrongly seized $1.6 million deposited as "front money" and $1.1 million in winnings after accusing them of cheating at mini baccarat during a graveyard shift on Christmas Eve 2011. The gamblers said they used a card-monitoring practice called edge-sorting, which involves players being able to tell the difference between some cards because of imperfections on their non-playing sides.
The gamblers including Cheung Yin Sun, a woman known as the "Queen of Sorts" for her card-monitoring skills, said they were denied the lawyer of their choice in tribal proceedings that ended with a ruling against them by the tribe's gambling commission.
When the gamblers filed suit in federal court, the casino's owner, the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, argued it had immunity, and a federal judge in early June dismissed the suit. An attorney for the plaintiffs on Wednesday filed notice of an appeal.
In the United States, there are 493 Indian casinos and 1,262 commercial casinos. In 2013, tribal casinos generated $28.3 billion in revenue while commercial properties had $37.7 billion, according to the Casino City research firm.
The options available to gamblers who want to press a claim depend on the contracts between tribes and the host states, which typically grant rights to operate locally in exchange for a share of revenue. The state of Connecticut, which does not require the tribe to waive sovereign immunity, has seven gambling regulation officers assigned to Foxwoods, but their role is limited to testing of the slot machines whose revenue is shared with the state. The state has no oversight of table games.
While tribal gambling commissions answer to the same tribes that own the casinos, National Indian Gaming Commission spokesman Michael Odle in Washington said they operate independently. He said those alleging a lack of impartiality could make the same argument about federal courts handling cases involving the U.S. government.
George Henningsen, chairman of the Pequot gaming commission, said it's difficult to dispel allegations of bias because it's typically only losers who speak out about their experiences with tribal justice.
A handful of lawyers around the country with expertise in gambling disputes say the worst horror stories are at tribal casinos. While some hope to bring pressure to put tribal properties on the same legal footing as commercial casinos, one attorney, Bob Nersesian, said he is more focused day to day on helping the clients who call with claims of abuse.
In the Arizona case, advantage players filed suit after they were detained on suspicion of cheating in 2011 at the Mazatzal Casino, owned by the Tonto Apache Tribe. A federal judge in Arizona last year ruled that sovereign immunity did not apply because tribal officials involved were named in their individual capacities, and an appeals court affirmed that decision on Tuesday.
One of the plaintiffs, Rahne Pistor, said the officers who detained him did not identify themselves as police and grabbed his genitals as they assaulted him.
"I simply had won more money than they liked," Pistor said, "so they kidnapped me, handcuffed me, forced me into an isolated back room in the casino and physically stole whatever money they could out of my pocket."
Nersesian, the plaintiffs' attorney in the Mazatzal case, said such disputes do not discourage advantage players from visiting tribal casinos. If anything, he said, they draw them out in greater numbers by showing the games can be beaten.
"It's more like somebody dying from a hot shot of heroin," he said. "As soon as that happens, the market goes up, not down."


http://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2015/07/01/gamblers-abuse-claims-test-sovereignty-of-us-tribal-casinos


Saturday, April 11, 2015

Madera County judge rules Chukchansi Casino raid case will proceed


VIDEO ON LINK



The criminal case against 15 defendants charged with various crimes during a raid at Chukchansi Casino last year will proceed, a judge ruled on Friday.

The motion to dismiss was on the grounds Madera County had a lack of jurisdiction since these events happened on Native American land. Part of the issue was also whether the police force hired by the Tex McDonald faction were true law enforcement officers the day they were seizing records from the gaming office.

Seven months later, faction leader Tex McDonald and tribal employee Vernon King are still locked up. Thirteen others posted bail and were released, including several others who say they should be exempt from the crimes which are alleged, since they were acting as police officers during the raid.

"The judge actually made a very interesting ruling. He didn't rule on the sovereign immunity issue at all as to the police officers. He ruled that the police officers could still be charged with excessive force," attorney Patrick Hanly said.

Inside court, Madera County Superior Court Judge Dale Blea pointed to other rulings around the country related to Native American land, property, crimes and jurisdictions. In the end, he said all sides can present evidence at the preliminary hearing, in what is a very rare and complicated case.

"The court noted that the tribe may select its own leaders, but leadership disputes may not be settled by means that violate state criminal laws. That's the question to be answered here," said Blea.

Attorneys argued the tribal police officers, hired by the Tex McDonald faction, cannot be charged with crimes such as kidnapping and assault with a deadly weapon because they were acting within the scope of their job during the raid.

But Madera County District Attorney David Linn believes there is some question about their authority at all. "Supposed police officers," he said.

The fighting among factions continues, according to tribal chairman Reggie Lewis. But leaders are working toward opening the casino again, as soon as possible.

"I've heard three or four months thrown out there as the earliest, and six months to a year at the latest," said Lewis.

In the meantime, the criminal case that closed the casino continues. And the district attorney is looking forward to a resolution, as soon as possible.

"I'm anxious to get this over with one way or the other. I am anxious to take this burden off the taxpayers of Madera County, which is what it is, and I am anxious for the casino to reopen," said Linn.

The defendants were all arraigned on Friday and pleaded not guilty. A preliminary hearing date will be set next week.
 
 
 
 

Saturday, March 14, 2015

Potential casino coming to South Bend




Potential casino coming to South Bend

Posted: Mar 13, 2015

More slot machines and table games could be coming to Michiana if plans are approved to build a casino in South Bend.
The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians got a response from the Federal Government on Thursday after a proposal they submitted two years ago.
They are seeking Trust Land to create a Tribal Village but now that they have a response, they are in the first step of a very lengthy process.

If they are able to get that Trust Land approved, it will be their decision in how they want to use it.

The Pokagon Band released a statement that said in part: "The Pokagon Band is seeking Trust Land to create a Tribal Village with the necessary infrastructure and services to support its citizens, including affordable housing, government and administrative offices, a community center, and health services. To fund this infrastructure and services, the Pokagon Band will also build a Four Winds Casino on the South Bend site, which will create jobs and provide continued economic support to the Pokagon Band and surrounding communities."

The Pokagon Band will use the Four Winds Casino to help sustain its community but some people are opposed to building a casino in South Bend.

According to Jake Teshka who is involved with the grassroots organization Citizens for a Better Michiana, he has seen studies based in cities where casinos are built.

“In areas where casinos are, crime can spike, violent crimes can spike as much as ten percent,” said Teshka.

He also thinks that small businesses could suffer as a result of the casino.

“By building a casino what we're doing is cutting off any future possibility of having major consumers in small business," Teshka added.

However, the Four Winds Casino in New Buffalo was built in 2007 and according to New Buffalo Township Supervisor Rose Dudiak it has been a success.

“This casino has been a win-win situation for us. The things we've been able to do in the township have been incredible. We would not be able to do them without the casino,” Dudiak said.

She also said the casino has brought in enough money that the New Buffalo Township Hall will soon go through a two million dollar renovation.

If the casino is built, it has the potential of bringing in about 2,000 permanent jobs and about 1,500 temporary construction jobs.

That is something South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg thinks will be good for the city.

“We got to work with them, figure out exactly what the plans are and how the city fits in but as long as this happens in the context of an overall agreement that benefits the city, benefits the community, then I think it could be a very positive thing for South Bend,” said Mayor Buttigieg.

The location of this land is near the U.S. 20 Bypass and covers 166 acres.


http://www.abc57.com/story/28491607/potential-casino-coming-to-south-bend

Monday, January 5, 2015

Aquinnah March On





Federal court hearing could determine fate of Aquinnah casino

  • A federal judge will hear oral arguments later this month in a case that could decide whether the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) can ultimately open a casino on Martha’s Vineyard.


  • By George Brennan
    gbrennan@capecodonline.com
    Posted Jan. 5, 2015 @ 3:00 am
    Updated at 7:08 AM




    A federal judge will hear oral arguments later this month in a case that could decide whether the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) can ultimately open a casino on Martha’s Vineyard.


    Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV has scheduled a hearing for Friday in U.S. District Court on a motion to dismiss the case.

    At the hearing, lawyers for the tribe, state, the town of Aquinnah and the Aquinnah/Gay Head Community Association will all have a chance to argue the complicated legal question of sovereign immunity, which the tribe is claiming.

    When Gov. Deval Patrick signed the Expanded Gaming Act into law in 2011, the Aquinnah tribe sought unsuccessfully to negotiate a tribal-state compact with Patrick for an off-island casino.

    But Patrick has held firm that the tribe waived its rights to a casino in making a land deal in 1983 that was ultimately codified by Congress in 1987. The tribe agreed to abide by state and local zoning laws in that agreement.

    Without the state’s support, the tribe failed to convince voters in Freetown and Lakeville to support a casino proposal brought forward in those towns by the Aquinnah tribe. That led to the tribe's decision to consider a high-stakes bingo hall on its island land. The tribe believes it has the rights to open such a Class II gambling facility, with bingo slots, machines that look and act like slot machines, without sharing any revenue with the state.

    The lawsuit against the Aquinnah tribe was brought by Patrick in December 2013 in an attempt to block the tribe’s plans to open a casino in a vacant community building on the tribe’s reservation land. Patrick brought the suit in state court alleging the tribe breached its contract with the state in the 1980s land settlement agreement.

    The tribe successfully moved to have the case heard in federal court, arguing the court has jurisdiction because of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, a federal law that gives tribes the right to locate casinos on Indian land under certain circumstances.

    That has set off a series of claims and counter-claims seeking to dismiss the case.

    The tribe has boasted support in a legal opinion offered by the National Indian Gaming Commission that its island lands qualify for Indian gaming. In essence, the opinion was that Indian gaming law supersedes land settlement agreements.

    All of this set up the showdown currently playing out, mostly in court documents, at the John Joseph Moakley Courthouse in Boston.


    http://www.capecodtimes.com/article/20150105/NEWS/150109760/101015/NEWSLETTER100



    Saturday, May 10, 2014

    Potawatomi tribe must turn over employment records, judge rules



    Indian Gaming > Forest County Potawatomi casino must reply to EEOC subpoena - Indianz.Com
    The Potawatomi Bingo Casino in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. ... That language seems to run counter to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. The law ...

    Potawatomi tribe must turn over employment records, judge rules

    Age discrimination case explores federal rights in tribal businesses




    The federal government can subpoena employment records from the Potawatomi tribe as part of an investigation of an age discrimination complaint, U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman said in an order issued this week.

    Adelman's order rejects the tribe's claim that federal age discrimination employment laws do not apply to its lucrative Potawatomi Bingo Casino, which employs about 2,700 people. The decision is expected to add fuel to an ongoing national debate over what federal laws apply to tribal casinos.

    "The casino is not an arm of the tribe's government and does not serve in a governmental role; instead, it is a business run by the tribe," Adelman wrote in an 11-page decision that gives the tribe 30 days to turn over the records. "Moreover the dispute involves a non-Indian, and the tribe has no internal process of adjudicating the dispute."

    The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission demanded records detailing age-discrimination complaints from the casino last year after Ferdico Colon lost his casino job and filed a complaint with the agency. Colon alleged he was treated differently than younger employees.

    The question of whether Indian casinos must abide by federal employment laws has been bouncing around Indian country and the federal court system for several years. Federal courts around the country have come down on different sides of the issue. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, which includes Wisconsin, has not yet ruled on the question.

    "It's so strange that we're deciding questions of the reach of state and federal governments onto Indian land today," said I. Nelson Rose, a gaming law expert and Whittier College law professor. "It's something that you would think would have been resolved 200 or 300 years ago."

    But, he added, "when the tribes had no money, the law basically didn't care."

    Tribal casinos and their associated business posted gaming revenue of more than $28 billion — including about $1.2 billion in Wisconsin — and employed nearly 700,000 people in 2012, according to Casino City's annual Indian Gaming Industry Report. The Potawatomi casino won about $400 million from gamblers in the year that ended June 30, 2013, according to a Journal Sentinel estimate based on payments the tribe makes to local governments.

    The fight between the EEOC and Potawatomi "is part of an ongoing battle between the EEOC and the NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) and tribes across the country," said R. Lance Boldrey, an attorney at Dykema Gossett in Michigan. "This is the type of case that has the issues that could make its way to the (U.S.) Supreme Court."

    Boldrey is leading the team hired by Gov. Scott Walker's administration that is studying the issues in the fight over whether an off-reservation casino should be allowed to open in Kenosha.

    Skip Durocher, co-chair of Indian Law Practice Group for Dorsey & Whitney in Minneapolis, agreed there is potential for a case to go to the Supreme Court because federal district and appellate "courts around the country have come down on both sides of the issue."

    Durocher said that "state labor and employment law is easy — it doesn't apply" to tribal business unless the tribe agrees to abide by the state law. But, he added, "the applicability of federal laws is a trickier issue."

    Rose said the U.S. Supreme Court has sent out signals that it doesn't like the sovereign immunity powers granted to tribes, and lower courts have been opening the door to federal agencies' exerting authority on tribal land.

    "It's kind of turning Indian law on its head," Rose said. "Twenty years ago (the Potawatomi case) would have been decided the opposite way ...Now I think there is pretty good chance it will be upheld" on appeal.

    Jeff Crawford, Potawatomi attorney general, said through a spokesman that the tribe "does not discriminate based on age" and it has not decided whether to appeal Adelman's decision.

    In his ruling, Adelman rejected the tribe's arguments that it is not subject to the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act and that it is does not fit the definition of "employer" under the act. He also rejected the tribe's claim that the information sought by the subpoena was irrelevant.

    "There's an awful lot of employees nationwide" at tribal casinos, said Dennis McBride, the EEOC senior trial attorney who brought the case. "This decision could pave the way for opening new avenues for relief for people who thought they had no avenue for relief."


    Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/business/potawatomi-tribe-must-turn-over-employment-records-judge-rules-b99266393z1-258712021.html#ixzz31MPk2Y81
    Follow us: @JournalSentinel on Twitter

    Friday, May 2, 2014

    Anti-casino coalition releases study



    Anti-casino coalition releases study

    Wednesday, January 15, 2014

    The Problems with Sovereignty!





    Federal judge hears Mashpee tribe's election dispute
    BOSTON — A U.S. District Court judge is being asked to dismiss a lawsuit that seeks a Bureau of Indian Affairs investigation into alleged irregularities in the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe's 2009 election of tribal leaders.
     
    Ben Schifman, an attorney for the BIA, said during a brief hearing before Judge Denise Casper that the case should be dismissed for two reasons — the federal agency has no authority over tribal elections and, even if it did, the tribe would have to be a party to the suit. Federally recognized tribes cannot be sued in state or federal courts because they have sovereign immunity, he said.
     
    "Ultimately, this suit is an intertribal dispute," Schifman said.
     
    But Jonathan Polloni, who represented the nine tribe members who brought the suit, said tribe members have taken the case to tribal court where it was dismissed on a technicality. They've also taken their case for an investigation to the BIA, which has failed to respond, he said.
     
    "This has left tribal members with no available redress," Polloni said.
     
    At issue is the 2009 election of Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council Chairman Cedric Cromwell and then Vice Chairman Aaron Tobey Jr..
     
    The nine tribe members filed suit last January saying the election results that year were tainted. After going through the tribe's fledgling court system with no success and petitioning the BIA to intervene on three separate occasions, tribe members went to federal court seeking a BIA investigation.
     
    The tribe members who brought the court action say four members of the tribe who had been shunned by the tribal council — a punishment that stripped them of voting rights, among other tribal benefits — were allowed to go back on the voting rolls for that 2009 election and two of them — Stephanie Tobey-Roderick and Michelle Fernandes — were allowed to cast ballots.
     
    The plaintiffs also allege that voters weren't properly vetted to ensure they were qualified members of the tribe. One of the plaintiffs is Patricia Oakley, a former tribe genealogist who was once responsible for checking the lineage of tribe members.
     
    Oakley and Nellie Ramos, two of the nine plaintiffs, declined to comment as they left the courtroom. Joining Oakley and Ramos as plaintiffs are Curtis Hendricks, George Bingham, Paul Mills, Nathaniel J. Tobey, Lawrence Tobey Jr., Francis Fermino and Leigh Potter.
     
    Schifman also argued that the investigation is moot because a subsequent election has been held and Cromwell was re-elected to office.
     
    "It's not about challenging who won the election, but whether tribe laws were followed," Polloni said.
    Casper took the motion to dismiss under advisement.
     
    Cromwell has said he expects the case to be dismissed. In a recent interview, he said the suit had already gone through the tribe's appeal process and was unfounded.
     
     
     
     

    Monday, December 23, 2013

    Mashpee Wampanoag/Genting Tribe: The Problem With Sovereignty

    Federal recognition bears costs and sacrifices, as many other tribes have discovered.



    Tribe members question $70M in spending
     
    Top Photo
    Wampanoag member Michelle FernandesCape Cod Times/Steve Heaslip
     

    MASHPEE — Two Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe members, punished for speaking out about alleged financial mismanagement seven years ago, are at it again.
     
    Michelle Fernandes and Stephanie Tobey-Roderick are renewing their questions about a lack of transparency from tribe leadership about how and where the tribe is spending the millions of dollars it has borrowed from tribe casino investors.

    By GEORGE BRENNAN

     
    Nine members of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe want a U.S. District Court judge to order the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs to investigate the 2009 election of current Mashpee Wampanoag Chairman Cedric Cromwell.
     
    On Jan. 14, a judge will hear the BIA's motion to dismiss the case.
     
    In a brief supporting the motion, BIA lawyers contend the request for an investigation is moot because a subsequent election has taken place. They also argue that the United States has not waived its sovereign immunity to be sued by tribe members.
     
    At issue is whether two members of the tribe who had been shunned by the tribal council – Michelle Fernandes and Stephanie Tobey-Roderick – should have been allowed to vote in the election. The plaintiffs also allege that voters weren't properly vetted to ensure they were qualified members of the tribe.
     
    In an email to the Times through the tribe's public relations firm, Cromwell said the complaint has already gone through the tribe's appeal process. “Due justice has taken place,” the email states.
     
    Meanwhile, questions are also being raised about the tribe's upcoming election in February. Four positions, including that of tribal council member Cheryl Frye-Cromwell, the chairman's wife, are up for re-election.
     
    Fernandes and Tobey-Roderick want Frye-Cromwell's sister, Kim Frye, to step aside as chairman of the tribe's election committee.
     
    Asked if that's a conflict of interest, Cromwell responded through the PR firm, saying, “The tribe has an independent election committee that follows the tribal election ordinance.”
     
    There is a provision in a proposed amendment to the election ordinance that would require Frye to step aside, but that has not been acted upon. A meeting of the tribal membership had been scheduled for Dec. 3 on that ordinance, but had to be postponed because of a BIA hearing in Taunton that night.
    Tobey-Roderick and Fernandes say a meeting has been scheduled for Dec. 30 to consider election-related issues, though there is no posting of it on the tribe's website.
     
    In 2006, the two filed suit in Barnstable Superior Court with two other tribe members and within days all four were shunned by the tribal council, a punishment that stripped them of their tribal rights for seven years and banned them from events such as the annual powwow.
     
    Ultimately, the suit was tossed from Barnstable Superior Court for lack of jurisdiction because, as a federally recognized tribe, the Mashpee Wampanoag is considered sovereign. But the substance of those allegations helped ignite a federal investigation that led to the ouster of former tribal council Chairman Glenn Marshall and, ultimately, his conviction on federal corruption and embezzlement charges.
     
    Fernandes and Tobey-Roderick have since been reinstated, though they say some tribe members still blame them for bringing down Marshall and contributing to the collapse of a Middleboro casino deal that some in the tribe saw as a gravy train.
     
    "That was a bad deal," Fernandes said. "They should be thanking us for saving the tribe."
     
    Now, as the tribe and its new investors hotly pursue a new $500 million casino in Taunton, Fernandes and Tobey-Roderick are raising new questions about financial transparency. At a meeting Saturday at the Mashpee Rod and Gun Club attended by more than 30 concerned tribe members, they began to gather signatures for a petition saying tribe members deserve to know now much the tribe has borrowed from investors and how the funds are being spent.
     
    The petition seeks information about tribal council salaries, credit card expenses, fees paid to consultants and funds allegedly doled out at the discretion of tribal council Chairman Cedric Cromwell.
     
    It's information, the two tribe members say, that would be readily available to citizens of a town, state or country through public records requests or, in some cases, by clicking into a database. But under the tribe's constitution, there is no mechanism to file a public records request.
     
    In order to call a special meeting of the tribe on the issues raised by the petitions, the two members need to gather 100 signatures of certified members. Another meeting is in the works for early January to gather signatures. The process was used by Cromwell confidant Aaron Tobey in the waning days of the Marshall-Shawn Hendricks administration to seek answers regarding tribe members being shunned and tribe finances.
     
    Money is being borrowed and spent in the name of the Mashpee Wampanoag, so members should be entitled to the information, Fernandes and Tobey-Roderick say.
     
    "We're not going to benefit from this," Fernandes said about the proposed casino. "Our children and our children's children are going to be faced with the bill to pay this back."
     
    Sources have told the Times that the tribe's debt now exceeds $70 million from its seven-year pursuit of various casino projects. As of October, the tribal gaming authority owed investors more than $65 million, according to a document inadvertently handed out during the tribe's monthly meeting in November and obtained by the Times. The same document shows that in 2013, the tribe spent $27 million through its gaming authority. Sources say tribe leaders have since borrowed more money.
     
    Fernandes and Tobey-Roderick say it's this trickle of information that has them worried about the unknown.
     
    "We're reconvening because we see a problem," Fernandes said. "(Tribe leaders) say it will stop the whole gaming initiative if they give out information. ... Not only are they taking money based on our tribal status, government status, citizen status, but they're saying we're going to spend the money and you don't have a right to know what we're spending it on.
     
    "Seven years ago, we asked, 'Where's the $15 million?'" Fernandes said about the money the tribe received from casino investor Herb Strather of Detroit. "Now we're asking, 'Where is the $70 million?' Where is it? We're at the same point. It's still an issue."
     
    Cromwell refused a request for an interview through Frank Quaratiello, a representative of Regan Communications, the tribe's public relations firm. Instead he asked for questions in writing. He then responded in an email from the public relations firm that tribe members are "well-informed about tribe finances" and budgets and expenditures are reviewed by auditors.
     
    "The tribe does not comment on internal financial matters," the email states.
     
    However, tribal council Secretary Marie Stone, reached by phone, criticized those speaking out about tribe finances.
     
    "We know the haters are out there spreading their lies," she said. "I think it's disgusting they are so shallow that they're willing to tear our family apart."
     
    Stone defended the borrowing and spending that's been done in support of the Taunton casino. "It takes money to make money," she said.
     
    As for transparency, Stone said tribe members were recently mailed the upcoming year's budget and though it doesn't attach salaries to names, it does provide a bottom line for all line items, she said.
     
    Fernandes and Tobey-Roderick also question a discretionary fund that Cromwell has at his disposal that, according to multiple sources, allows him to provide up to $2,500 to an individual tribe member.
     
    The email from the tribe's public relations firm acknowledges the fund, but says it is for "emergency hardships" and there are "strict internal controls" on how that money is spent.
     
    Cromwell is supposed to provide a reason to the tribal council for payments, but sources say that hasn't been happening.
     
    Tribe members have little recourse to force the issue without filing petitions. State courts won't hear their cases and recently the U.S. District Court, citing a lack of jurisdiction, rejected a request by Tobey-Roderick to have the court intervene on what she considered questionable credit card spending. The case was dismissed without prejudice, which means she can bring it back if she can make a stronger case for why that court should intervene.
     
    Other records obtained by the Times show one-month American Express charges on a tribal credit card as high as $10,000 for some tribe leaders in 2012. Cromwell answered concerns of tribe members in 2012, according to a document provided to the Times, saying the money was for travel, food and lodging.
     
    Tobey-Roderick and Fernandes say they want specifics in light of the recent conviction of a Pequot tribe leader in Connecticut who misused tribe-issued credit cards.
     
    In the email to the Times, Cromwell said credit card expenses are also audited.
     
    A recent decision by the Supreme Court of the Wampanoag Tribe found that there is no mechanism for tribe members to sue the tribal council — something tribal Judge Robert Mills said in his decision should be rectified. So far, it hasn't been.
     
    Stone, who attempted to sue her fellow councilors over what she believed was an unjust suspension, said she will file an amendment in 2014 to allow action against the tribal council.
     
    "This government can't be held accountable right now," she said.
     
    Cromwell ran on a platform that boasted his financial acumen and a promise of transparency, but the two tribe members say he hasn't lived up to that vow. "It's not the transparent government they said they were going to stand up for," Fernandes said.

     
     

    Tribe leader's election disputed

     
    Nine members of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe want a U.S. District Court judge to order the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs to investigate the 2009 election of current Mashpee Wampanoag Chairman Cedric Cromwell.
     
    On Jan. 14, a judge will hear the BIA's motion to dismiss the case.
     
    In a brief supporting the motion, BIA lawyers contend the request for an investigation is moot because a subsequent election has taken place. They also argue that the United States has not waived its sovereign immunity to be sued by tribe members.
     
    At issue is whether two members of the tribe who had been shunned by the tribal council — Michelle Fernandes and Stephanie Tobey-Roderick — should have been allowed to vote in the election. The plaintiffs also allege that voters weren't properly vetted to ensure they were qualified members of the tribe.
     
    In an email to the Times through the tribe's public relations firm, Cromwell said the complaint has already gone through the tribe's appeal process.
     
    "Due justice has taken place," the email states.
     
    Meanwhile, questions are also being raised about the tribe's upcoming election in February. Four positions, including that of tribal council member Cheryl Frye-Cromwell, the chairman's wife, are up for re-election.
     
    Fernandes and Tobey-Roderick want Frye-Cromwell's sister, Kim Frye, to step aside as chairman of the tribe's election committee.
     
    Asked if that's a conflict of interest, Cromwell responded through the PR firm, saying, "The tribe has an independent election committee that follows the tribal election ordinance."
     
    There is a provision in a proposed amendment to the election ordinance that would require Frye to step aside, but that has not been acted upon. A meeting of the tribal membership had been scheduled for Dec. 3 on that ordinance, but had to be postponed because of a BIA hearing in Taunton that night.
    Tobey-Roderick and Fernandes say a meeting has been scheduled for Dec. 30 to consider election-related issues, though there is no posting of it on the tribe's website.


    http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20131223%2FNEWS%2F312230320&utm_source=ML+13%2F12%2F23&utm_campaign=20131223ML&utm_medium=email