Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label regulations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label regulations. Show all posts

Friday, July 31, 2015

High rollers: Dealers describe special treatment, abuse





Casinos forced to deal with rule-breaking high rollers


07.31.2015     08:22 AM     

SportsMemo.com blog entry.
Not surprising, but for all the stringent rules casinos have, those who enter with a suitcase full of cash can typically get away with anything they want. That includes acting like a spoiled six-year old who doesn't like it when they lose.


"All men are created equal except in the casino," Glen Costales, the pit manager, said at a hearing before a tribal gaming commission in May. Transcripts of the hearing were obtained by The Associated Press. "If it's a premium player, he gets away with a lot more than the five-dollar player would get away with."

"The casinos pretend they have rules that are set in stone, like going into a bank or dealing with a police station. Are they supposed to allow late bets? Absolutely not. Do they do it all the time? All the time," said Kaufmann, a dealer who sees plenty of crude behavior himself. "The abuse, the screaming, the cheating, the sexual harassment. Throwing things around. It's worse all the time."





High rollers: Dealers describe special 

treatment, abuse

Image
JESSICA HILL / AP
In this Sept. 18, 2013, file photo, patrons play craps at a table at Mohegan Sun in Uncasville, Conn. In the competition to attract and keep the biggest spenders, casinos are known to pull out the stops with comped hotel rooms, meals and rebates for a percentage of their losses. During a May 2015 hearing, dealers said they often had to endure abuse from high roller betters while extending courtesies average players do not receive.



Updated Tuesday, July 28, 2015 | 1:27 p.m.
UNCASVILLE, Conn. — One high roller requests a refrigerator full of bananas that he squeezes and throws as he gambles. Another urinates against a wall. Other high-stakes players described by a pit manager at Mohegan Sun, one of the world's largest casinos, throw chairs, scream at dealers and expect rules to be bent at the tables.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^





In the increasing competition for the biggest spenders, casinos are known to pull out all the stops with comped hotel rooms, meals and rebates for a percentage of their losses. But some dealers say efforts to satisfy and retain the players — known as "whales" — go much further, with casinos tolerating abuse and extending courtesies that test the integrity of the games.


"All men are created equal except in the casino," Glen Costales, the pit manager, said at a hearing before a tribal gaming commission in May. Transcripts of the hearing were obtained by The Associated Press. "If it's


Costales was testifying in support of a pit boss, Maria DeGiacomo, who was fired this year after the casino accused her of colluding with a high roller by allowing late bets at a blackjack table. DeGiacomo and other employees say dealers frequently grant similar requests from top players.

The player, Matthew Menchetti, was a regular who lost as much as $50,000 on visits to Mohegan Sun, and a lifetime total of more than $1 million. Casino security flagged his play as suspicious in February and asked state police to arrest him and two dealers, but the detective concluded DeGiacomo and another dealer apparently took it upon themselves to keep Menchetti happy and playing, according to a police report, and no charges were filed.

His attorney, John Strafaci, said Menchetti is seeking to have his name cleared by the gaming commission since state police cleared him of wrongdoing. He said what his client was doing was normal for players of his caliber.

Mohegan Sun's president, Raymond Pineault, said its termination of the dealers involved and its ejection of the player demonstrate it does not tolerate any bending of the rules.

Shane Kaufmann, a vice president for a branch of the Transport Workers Union in Las Vegas, which represents several thousand casino dealers, said rules are frequently ignored at high-stakes tables.

"The casinos pretend they have rules that are set in stone, like going into a bank or dealing with a police station. Are they supposed to allow late bets? Absolutely not. Do they do it all the time? All the time," said Kaufmann, a dealer who sees plenty of crude behavior himself. "The abuse, the screaming, the cheating, the sexual harassment. Throwing things around. It's worse all the time."

Gaming commissions enforce the rules at casinos across the country, but the level of scrutiny can vary by jurisdiction. Dealers say state inspectors in Atlantic City, New Jersey, for one, have a reputation for toughness. In Connecticut, the state does not have any oversight of table games at Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods, where the tribes that own the casinos also control their own gaming commissions.

Costales, who described the banana squeezer and public urinator without revealing their names in his testimony, said such outrageous behavior is tolerated more these days because of growing competition than when he joined the business three decades ago.

Menchetti, who also was testifying in support of DeGiacomo, told the gaming commission that when he said he'd forgotten to post a bet, DeGiacomo and others generally made accommodations. He said the intention was never to steal — at most, it prolonged his stay at the table — but he expected special treatment, given his level of play, according to the transcript of the hearing.

"It's no different in my mind than me calling my host and asking him for an extra 2,500 points on my account so I can go purchase something at a Lux, Bond & Green," he said, referring to a jewelry store.

DeGiacomo said Menchetti did not do anything close to cheating and the two of them became victims of selective enforcement because certain bosses did not like either of them.

DeGiacomo, who is still fighting her dismissal, said rules shifted depending on the player and pit bosses were encouraged to keep high rollers happy. She testified during her hearing: "I have to make sure that we get our money, which we did, every time he played. There's maybe two times he won."

As part of the state police investigation, the detective interviewed several dealers who said Menchetti would hit the table, curse and yell at them. They told the detective that in cases where he or other high rollers asked to post a late bet or for other considerations, they would defer to a superior.


http://lasvegassun.com/news/2015/jul/28/high-rollers-dealers-describe-special-treatment-ab/?_ga=1.48915744.70279974.1427122288



Thursday, February 26, 2015

PA: A Slap on the Wrist for Meadows!


If Pennsylvania wanted to ensure that Casinos abided by regulations, the $$$ would be a percentage of profits - you'd see how fast Casinos would comply!





Meadows fined $15,000 for underage gambler

 
The operator of The Meadows Casino was fined $15,000 for allowing an underage player to gamble on slot machines.
The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board announced the fine Wednesday against Washington Trotting Association after a male, age 20, gained access to the gaming floor of the North Strabane Township casino. Under state law, a player must be at least 21 to bet on slot machines or table games.

That was one of five consent agreements PGCB approved resulting in $77,500 in fines. The agreements were forged between the PGCB’s Office of Enforcement Counsel and the operators of three casinos, including the Rivers Casino in Pittsburgh.

Holdings Acquisition Co. L.P., operator of the North Side facility, was hit with two fines totaling $27,500. One was for $22,500 for incidents in which casino personnel violated board regulations or the Rivers’ internal controls in conducting table games. The other was $5,000 for check cashing violations.

Downs Racing L.P., operator of Mohegan Sun Pocono in Luzerne County, likewise was fined twice and will pay the largest amount – a total of $35,000. They were: $30,000 for five incidents in which a person on the PGCB’s Self-Exclusion List was permitted to enter and gamble, and $5,000 for conducting business with an unlicensed gaming service provider.

For more infirmation, visit gamingcontrolboard.pa.gov.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Money Laundering at Casinos by High Rollers to be Addressed


Exclusive: U.S. to require casinos to vet high rollers' funds - sources


ST. LOUIS Wed Mar 26, 2014

People play at slot machines inside Resorts World Casino, owned by Malaysian gaming company Genting, in the Queens borough of New York, November 22, 2013. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton
People play at slot machines inside Resorts World Casino, owned by Malaysian gaming company Genting, in the Queens borough of New York, November 22, 2013.
Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton



(Reuters) - U.S. casinos may soon have to vet where their high rollers' funds come from under a requirement being developed by the U.S. Treasury Department, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The move is part of a push to address longstanding regulatory and law enforcement concerns that criminals can use casinos, which have not historically been as closely monitored as banks for compliance with anti-money laundering laws, to convert proceeds of crime into money that appears clean.

Under current law, casinos are required to report suspicious activity. A customer who used a large sum of cash to buy chips, gambled briefly, and then asked to cash out with a casino check, for example, would likely get reported to authorities.

But existing rules do not explicitly require casinos to vet the source of gamblers' funds.

The new rule, which is being considered by Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) unit and would make such obligations explicit, is in the early stages and may take a year or more to complete, the people familiar with the proposal said.

The rule is likely to require casinos to get more information about certain customers in order to shed light on high-risk transactions such as international wires and large cash deposits, said the sources, who asked not to be named.

FinCEN spokesman Steve Hudak declined to comment  on "any potential rule making," but said the Treasury bureau "continually examines its rules, and periodically considers updates, to ensure their continued effectiveness".
A spokeswoman for a casino trade group, the American Gaming Association, said the group is engaging regularly with FinCEN, but declined to comment on any specific discussions.

"Our industry is committed to a culture of compliance and we appreciate FinCEN's open dialogue and look forward to future collaboration," Stephanie Chan said.

PROBING CUSTOMERS

Even though the agency has not yet publicly discussed any rule proposal, FinCEN officials have in recent months stepped up their outreach to the industry.

In September, FinCEN director Jennifer Shasky Calvery delivered a strongly worded message at a gaming industry conference.

"When some casinos say that probing their customers about their activities outside of the casino will drive customers away, I sense that they feel that it is not their responsibility to protect their institutions, and our financial system as a whole, from being used by illicit actors," Shasky said.

"You ask your customers many questions about their preferences; you can and should get information about their sources of funds to meet your obligations to identify and report suspicious activity," she added.

In August Las Vegas Sands Corp agreed to pay the Justice Department more than $47 million over anti-money laundering lapses at its Venetian and Palazzo hotel complex in Las Vegas.

FinCEN is also investigating possible compliance lapses at other Las Vegas casinos, the two sources said.

"There is a sea change afoot with respect to casinos and U.S. government focus on them because there is just so much money that moves through casinos," said Kevin Rosenberg, a former federal prosecutor in Los Angeles who pursued the Sands case and is now in private practice. "The message is 'You've got to get a lot better than you have been.'"

(Reporting by Brett Wolf of the Compliance Complete service of Thomson Reuters Accelus accelus.thomsonreuters.com/; Editing by Randall Mikkelsen and Stephen Powell)



http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/26/us-usa-casinos-moneylaundering-idUSBREA2P1P120140326



Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Fox Guarding Hen House in Maine




Gambling board questions independence of casino overseer that wants to buy slot machine distributor




Monday, July 1, 2013


File photo
Scientific Games, which holds a state contract to track real-time slot machine revenues at Hollywood Casino in Bangor and Oxford Casino and report it to the state, announced its plans earlier this year to acquire the gaming company WMS Industries. WMS is one of five slot machine distributors authorized to do business in Maine.


AUGUSTA — The company that tracks slot machine revenues at Maine’s casinos and warns the state’s gaming regulators if anything is amiss is acquiring one of the five slot machine distributors authorized to do business in Maine.

Scientific Games, which holds a state contract to track real-time slot machine revenues at Hollywood Casino in Bangor and Oxford Casino and report it to the state, announced its plans earlier this year to acquire the gaming company WMS Industries. The two companies expect to complete the deal by the end of the year.

Once the $1.5 billion transaction is complete, Scientific Games would be keeping track of the revenues generated by machines manufactured by its subsidiary and four other distributors and letting the Maine Gambling Control Board know of any malfunctions. Scientific Games is also responsible for shutting down slot machines and informing the control board if any machines fall out of compliance with the state’s standards for the slot machine software.

The five-member Maine Gambling Control Board won’t be required to issue a new distribution license to the combined company, but the board will have to determine if the reconfigured company meets the requirements of its current license, said Patrick Fleming, the control board’s executive director.

Fleming said he’s preparing an analysis for the board to assess whether Scientific Games can continue its independent oversight role for the state’s slot machines when the company owns one of slot machine manufacturers.

“They’re pretty independent at this point from what I can see,” he said.

The control board quizzed a Scientific Games vice president about the acquisition at an April board meeting.

“We rely on you to monitor our slot machines, and we’ve relied on you since Day One,” said Timothy Doyle, the board’s chairman. “How do you segregate the duties such that the monitoring system and the machines, they maintain the integrity that the state expects?”

Brennen Lawrence, senior vice president and general manager for Scientific Games, said the company is obligated by the terms of its contract with the state to perform what’s known as central site monitoring for slot machines.

“Your requirements of Scientific Games are very specific for the data that we acquire,” Lawrence told the control board. “Although we might have tons of data points, none of it is accessible, and none of it is allowed for Scientific Games’ use for any other purpose than providing it to the state.”

Doyle suggested the company set up a management structure that isolates central site monitoring from slot machine sales and distribution. “I think the board will be looking at that with a sharp eye,” he said at the April meeting.

Doyle declined to comment further on Monday, saying he shouldn’t prejudge a matter before the Gambling Control Board. Aimee Remey, a Scientific Games spokeswoman, said Maine is one of 14 North American gambling jurisdictions that allow central site monitors to also own machines.

Scientific Games has performed central site monitoring for Maine slot machines since 2004, before Hollywood Slots opened its doors in Bangor. All slot machines at Maine’s two casinos are connected to a Scientific Games system that collects real-time revenue figures. Scientific Games makes sure the machines are reporting the numbers correctly and reports those numbers to the state.

The casinos submit revenue figures separately, and Maine Gambling Control Board auditors confirm the figures are accurate.

Under its contract, which expires in 2017, Scientific Games collects 0.88 percent of net slot machine revenue, Fleming said. That amounted to more than $5 million in 2012, according to Maine Gambling Control Board figures.

The company also has a separate contract to operate much of Maine’s state lottery.
WMS Industries is one of five distributors authorized to sell slot machines in Maine and is one of the largest gaming manufacturers in the country.

I. Nelson Rose, an expert in gambling law and a professor at Whittier Law School in Costa Mesa, Calif., said he wouldn’t be surprised to see a state in Maine’s situation put its central site monitoring contract back up for bid in order to avoid a conflict.

“The state is going to have to decide whether the companies are still going to be independent enough to trust,” he said, “and they have to worry about reputation, so they may very well require that the contract be put up for bid again.

“It’s not a good image to be self-regulating, even if it’s common.”


http://www.sunjournal.com/news/0001/11/30/gambling-board-questions-independence-casino-overs/1387252

Sunday, May 26, 2013

California Says No to Galaxy Gaming



California Says No to Galaxy Gaming, But Nevada Might Say Yes

Posted by Peter McCullough on May 25, 2013
 
There are several “rules of engagement” in Galaxy Gaming’s guiding principles that seem to conflict with a recent ruling made against the companies CEO Robert Saucier.
 
Administrative Law Judge Catherine Frink made no bones about her ruling deeming the CEO as “evasive and, in some instances, intentionally dishonest.”

The Las Vegas manufacturer of casino table games, was denied the right to doing business in California due to a lengthy and ongoing investigation calling into question several unsavory business practices that could have an unfavorable outcome of the companies Nevada gaming license.
Saucier is under scrutiny for misleading and misrepresentation of information regarding business ventures, signing unapproved licensing deals with California tribal casinos, lawsuits and even information that may have been false about his own personal past.

In 2002 Saucer applied for a gaming license with Tule River Tribe Gaming Commission, at that time the Commission began an investigation with the help of the Bureau of Gaming Control. The investigation uncovered that Saucier did not give full disclosure of very pertinent facts and what could be harmful business ventures that are very relevant to approval by the state of California.

According to the 2002 report Saucier list of information that was never disclosed included:
  • Failure to mention an order to pay a $1.5 million judgment to Sherron Associates, a creditor in a hotel-casino project.
  • Failed to reveal gambling taxes owed to City of Spokane in WA State by his Mars Hotel and Casino, a hotel that eventually failed.
  • Misrepresented his past drunk driving conviction stating it was dismissed
  • Failed to list a valid address. He filed his personal federal income tax returns in Washington, listed a condominium in Mexico as his home and had a license for a home-based business in Las Vegas.
  • Failed to disclose multiple businesses: Galaxy Gaming of Nevada, LLC; Galaxy Gaming of Oregon, LLC; Bonus Blackjack, LLC; Intergalactic; and others.
  • Failed to mention gaming licenses from other states, including Washington and Nevada.
  • Did not reveal that he pays child support.
  • Did not disclose his involvement in past lawsuits. For instance, he sued the Mars Hotel for $1.6 million in 1998. “In essence, he sued himself and received a default judgment,” Frink wrote.
  • Failed to mention a foreclosed house and two personal credit card bills that were sent to collections.
  • Had no Nevada business license, as required, from 2001 to 2004. He blamed the missing license on an “oversight by staff.”
  • Claimed to have graduated from UNR, but he did not.
“In a highly regulated industry such as gaming, the failure to be forthcoming with relevant information was inexcusable,” commented Frink.
Saucier’s case was assigned to the Attorney General’s Office in 2007 for prosecution and is still pending further investigation. Mired in lawsuits and controversy, it still seems as though that Saucier may not have to answer to his past when it comes to his Nevada.

Apparently different states in the US have vastly different laws and regulatory standards. Nevada’s Gaming Control Board chairman, Burnett stated,
“Other states sometimes have vastly different laws and regulatory standards than we do.” “There are cases when a ‘denial’ doesn’t mean the same thing as it does in Nevada. For example, in some states in the Midwest, there have been denial proceedings but they’re for various transactions and don’t necessarily relate to the integrity or the suitability of the company itself.”
 
 
 
 

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Reducing Oversight to Save Casinos $$$$

When Casinos own your state, the partnership demands protection to ensure profitability, consequences be damned!




DCI agent cuts in the cards for Iowa casinos?

Union, lawmaker raise concerns about plan to slash state staff at facilities, which would save industry millions


Apr. 27, 2013


Written by
William Petroski

State lawmakers are planning to dramatically slash the force of state investigative agents at most of Iowa’s casinos — a move that would save the gambling industry $3.7 million annually.

But questions have arisen about whether the changes could jeopardize the state’s ability to detect patrons and dealers trying to cheat at casino table games and slot machines, as well as its ability to prevent thefts, money laundering and other crimes.

There are 108 agents and supervisors from the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation working at the 18 state-regulated casinos and three racetracks, which had 22.7 million admissions last year with gross casino revenues of more than $1.4 billion. Under a budget bill in a House-Senate conference committee, the number of DCI agents and supervisors — whose salaries are paid by casino fees — would be reduced to 60 over a three-year period.

A union representing the agents argues the cuts go too far, and warns the plan is a shift toward casinos policing themselves. Meanwhile, a key state senator says he wants to ensure the honesty of Iowa’s gambling industry isn’t shortchanged. The three racetrack casinos, including Prairie Meadows in Altoona, would not be part of the cuts.

Gambling industry officials insist that in-house security employees and off-duty local law enforcement officers can fill any gaps left by departing DCI agents. But Sen. Tom Courtney, D-Burlington, chairman of a Senate public safety budget panel, said he expects more committee talks before a final decision is made.

“I just want to make sure that this is not the casinos saying, ‘We want to chop some heads,’ ” Courtney said. One of his concerns, he added, is avoiding situations where “the fox is guarding the chicken house.”

The Iowa Gaming Association, representing the casino industry, has developed the plan in cooperation with top officials at the Department of Public Safety and other state agencies. Iowa’s casinos — some of which have seen flat or declining revenues in recent years — are anxious to implement the plan to improve their financial bottom lines.

DCI Assistant Director Dave Button said the current staffing model dates to 1991, when Iowa became the first state to offer riverboat gambling. Because the riverboats regularly cruised on the Mississippi River, leaving Iowa cities where they were docked, state law enforcement agents were needed to ensure jurisdictional questions didn’t arise.

But with all of Iowa’s casinos now either permanently anchored or operating as land-based gambling facilities, Button said, the number of state agents assigned to them can be reduced without causing problems. He noted that Iowa’s racetrack casinos in Altoona, Council Bluffs and Dubuque each operate with three DCI agents, while all other casinos have six or seven DCI agents.

“There is no integrity issue there” at the racetrack casinos, Button said.

The staffing-reduction proposal would gradually eliminate all lower-ranking DCI agents who now serve in front-line law enforcement roles on casino floors to monitor gambling operations and perform investigative work. The remaining agents would be primarily focused on conducting background investigations on people and companies involved with the casino industry, as well as criminal investigations related to casino gambling.

Most agents whose jobs would be eliminated would either be promoted and remain at the casinos or offered jobs elsewhere in the Iowa Department of Public Safety, such as in narcotics enforcement, general criminal investigation, or with the Iowa State Patrol or the state fire marshal’s office.

Wes Ehrecke, president of the state gaming association, said security staffing at the casinos ranges from about 26 to 60 people at each facility, depending on its size and whether it is open 24 hours.

Some casinos hire off-duty local police and sheriff’s deputies as backup security staffers, and all gambling businesses work with local law enforcement when crimes and other serious incidents occur.
Ehrecke describes the proposed changes in DCI staffing at Iowa’s casinos as the result of “very thoughtful and deliberate discussions” with state officials. He suggests the agency’s realignment simply reflects a “right-sizing” of staffing levels.

Sue Brown, executive director of the State Police Officers Council, which represents DCI agents in collective bargaining, has sent a letter to House members suggesting the cuts are too deep and could hurt Iowa’s gambling industry.

The agents are the only impartial, outside enforcement within the facility to ensure rules are upheld and Iowans are gambling in a fair environment, Brown said. In addition, local police departments are not trained to spot felony violations, she said. One example of such cheating is known as “capping a bet,” which means to place a winning wager on a table game after the outcome is known.

Brown suggested a compromise that would trim the force less deeply, saving the gambling industry $1.9 million instead of $3.7 million.

Jeff Lamberti of Ankeny, chairman of the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission, said he is probably OK with the plan being considered by state lawmakers.

Regardless of whether the bill passes, all of Iowa’s casinos must submit a security plan approved by state regulators, he noted.

“We don’t have any intention of reducing what we believe is appropriate to satisfy security and integrity,” Lamberti said.

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20130428/NEWS/304280035/DCI-agent-cuts-in-the-cards-for-Iowa-casinos-?Frontpage

 

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Addiction and Crime A Concern



By: James Whittaker | james.whittaker@cfp.ky

Addiction and crime a concern with casinos

GamblingAddict1
 
Gambling addiction is one of the downsides of casinos.
PHOTO: FILE

The potential for increased crime and social problems has been cited as a major downside of allowing casinos in the Cayman Islands.

Most experts acknowledge that casinos do bring baggage with them in terms of increased problems with addiction.

There are also cost implications for law enforcement in terms of oversight and policing connected to casinos, though a direct link to serious increases in crime has not been substantiated by studies.
University of the West Indies professor Ian Boxill, who produced a report on the potential impact of casino gambling in Jamaica, said: “The research in the US shows that certain types of crime may increase with the presence of casinos.

“However, other crimes may be reduced given the increased security with the coming of casinos, since there is tendency to increase law enforcement capacity in the casinos areas. It all depends on how the casinos are managed.”

He accepted that there were also concerns over addiction and divorce rates.

“A lot depends on what mechanisms are in place to address these issues and mandate owners and regulators to anticipate and deal with social problems associated with problem gambling that may result from increased gambling among the local population.”

A feasibility study in Bermuda on the possibility of legalising casino gambling estimated that total costs of dealing with crime, counselling addicts and setting up a Gaming Commission Board to regulate the industry could run as high as $7 million.

Though the report ultimately concluded these costs would be more than mitigated by revenues, the finding lends weight to the argument that there would be a social price to pay.

The report points out: “Based on the estimated incidence of problem gambling, the additional staff required will include certified gambling counsellors, a psychologist experienced with addressing pathological gamblers, additional addiction counsellors and a social worker.”

The report also suggests a gambling helpline would have to be set up, new auditors and regulators hired and an additional $1 million annually spent on policing.

No similar report has been done for the Cayman Islands and some, like Ellio Solomon, believe that sort of research would have to take place before the debate goes any further.

Mr. Solomon, a United Democratic Party legislator for George Town, said Cayman’s lawmakers needed to look carefully at the numbers.

“We need to get past feel good statements about revenues and get to some real maths. Everyone you speak to will say you can raise revenue, but ask them how much and what the expenses are and they can’t tell you.”

He said there were hidden costs, including the potential for increased reliance on state handouts from families affected by addiction.

Mr. Boxill said some of those concerns could be mitigated by having casinos for visitors only, as happens in the Bahamas.

But he said no government should proceed without doing due diligence on what would be required.

“The critical issue is for government to approach casinos cautiously and with the research, so that the structures are put in place to address possible problems that may occur.

“Often this is not done in the Caribbean and governments do things for short term gain, but they in turn create long term problems. 

“If approached sensibly, creatively and with correct information and expertise, casinos may be beneficial to the country that chooses to have them. The critical thing is for policy makers to understand what they are getting into and take the necessary steps to address all sides of the issue.”
The issue of direct casino-related crime is less clear cut.

The American Gaming Association cites several studies that have been conducted in the US as evidence that there is no link between casinos and crime.  [Frank Fahrenkopf learned his lessons well with the Tobacco Industry and has funded the lopsided research that's available. Statistics are available that readily refute AGA's claims.]

“While anecdotal evidence and popular myth have perpetuated claims by gambling opponents that the introduction of casinos causes a rise in street crime, recent studies, both publicly and privately funded, as well as testimony from law enforcement agents working in casino jurisdictions, refute this claim,” it says on its website.

Grant Stitt, a university of Nevada professor who co-authored a study on casinos and crime, said communities that had recently introduced casinos had seen negligible impact.

He said: “One of the things that people need to remember is that casinos are businesses and they are concerned about their image. They do everything they can to operate safely. They have really good security in their parking lots, the areas surrounding the casino and of course within the building.
Anyone who commits a crime inside a casino is an idiot, because big brother is always watching; there are cameras in the sky.”

http://www.compasscayman.com/caycompass/2013/04/18/Addiction-and-crime-a-concern-with-casinos/

 

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Several Georgia slot machines give illegal payouts

Wonder how much this costs to monitor a small number of Slots at convenience stores?

Several Rome slot machines give illegal payouts, police say

Police were at a Marathon gas station at 2039 Maple Road
on Monday morning as part of a gambling investigation.
(Lauren Jones, RN-T)
Mar 26, 2013
ROME, Ga. -- Authorities in Floyd County are investigating possible illegal payouts from slot machines at seven service stations in the area.

Complaints had been filed for quite some time, so forces were joined on Monday between the Rome Police Department, Floyd County Police Department, Floyd County Sheriff's Office and Floyd County District Attorney's Office.

The Rome-News Tribune spoke to Floyd County Sheriff Tim Burkhalter, who acknowledged that having slot machines in a gas station is legal, but a cash payout is not.

"This is something we feel is a scourge in our community," Burkhalter said. "This is not a victimless crime. This is the first sweep."

Nikki Raj told Rome-News Tribune that her family owns the Marathon station of 2039 Maple Street, and she was not worried about the investigation.

She said her family runs the Marathon's slot machines according to Georgia law, and that any customer who won playing the slot machine would use their prize as store credit to buy merchandise.

According to Rome-New Tribune, other gas stations that have been investigated include the BP at 3486 Martha Berry Highway, the Citgo 1928 Shorter Avenue, the Marathon at 2039 Maple Road, the Twinkie's Food Mart on Calhoun Road and two others.

http://www.11alive.com/news/article/285118/40/Several-Rome-slot-machines-give-illegal-payouts-police-say

Monday, March 4, 2013

Lawmaker questions need for state police at casinos



Lawmaker questions need for state police at casinos

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Massachusetts casino panel weighs key policy questions






Massachusetts casino panel weighs key policy questions
By The Associated Press
on December 11, 2012

BOSTON (AP) — Before the state gaming commission can begin awarding casino licenses, it must first come up with a set of rules and regulations for fully implementing the year-old expanded gambling law.

That process will begin on Tuesday with the first of several days of hearings to address dozens of "policy questions" raised by the new law, which allows up to three resort-style casinos and one slots parlor in Massachusetts.

For example, the law requires would-be casino developers to address any traffic or other concerns raised by surrounding communities. But it does not clearly state what constitutes a surrounding community.

Another question the commission is trying to answer is whether the regional casino licenses should be awarded simultaneously, or one at a time.

The panel is not expected to hand out licenses before early 2014.

http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/12/massachusetts_casino_panel_wei.html?utm_source=Morning+12%2F11&utm_campaign=ML+afternoon+1&utm_medium=email

Friday, November 9, 2012

PA Right-to-Know Law



From: Bill Kearney commented on mcall.com.

Meanwhile sitting in our Senate in the Community, Economic & Recreational Development Committee since Dec. 5, 2011 is House-Bill 2009. This legislation makes the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board post on it’s website a description of all requests for access to records under the act of February 14, 2008 known as the Right-to-Know Law. Now the reason this legislation has not come out of committee is because of two amendments that are attached to it. One amendment would make all table game taxes go to the Pa. property tax relief fund and the other one would make our casinos mail monthly statements to their patrons who are enrolled in casino Reward Card programs.

These statements would enable gamblers and their family members to spot a loved one's gambling problem before it gets out of hand. Who knows how many Pennsylvanians and their families would be in a better domestic and financial situation when being made aware, month after month, of their wins and mostly LOSSES in black and white.

You can help get this legislation passed by contacting your Pa. Senator and telling them you support HB-2009 and the amendments on it.




Man who robbed 80-year-old with Alzheimer's gets state prison
or
http://www.mcall.com/news/breaking/mc-east-allen-home-invasion-robbery-20121108,0,3266478.story?fb_comment_id=fbc_278558675598628_1217540_278979605556535#f5d0c489e6a21

Friday, October 12, 2012

Duty of Care




Extend duty of care to pokies: MPs


October 12, 2012



Richard WillinghamRichard Willingham

Richard Willingham is regional affairs correspondent







Pokies
Pokies Photo: Andrew Quilty
Gambling venues could be sued if they failed their ''duty of care'' to prevent punters becoming addicts, under a plan being pursued by a quartet of MPs.

And a punters winnings could be forfeited if he or she gambled despite opting to exclude themselves from venues.

The MPs — independents Andrew Wilkie, Nick Xenophon, Greens' Richard Di Natale and the DLP's John Madigan — say staff are not intervening even when gambling addiction is clear.

They say a parliamentary inquiry into problem gambling also heard that self-exclusion — where punters can have themselves barred from a venue — is largely a fiction.

Under a legislated duty of care,  they say if a person exhibits problem gambling behaviour consistently without any response from the venue, action could be taken against it.

''We believe this would result in a change of behaviour from venues,'' say the MPs, who sat on the inquiry with eight others but are making these recommendations separately.

Currently many venues offer self-exclusion where addicts can ask the venue to ban them from the premises.

This morning Mr Wilkie released a report by the committee backing attempts to extend venue self-exclusion to across states.

And they said if punters breached such exclusions - and venues failed to prevent them from gambling - then their winnings should be forfeited.

Additionally, the MPs are calling on government to investigate ways of introducing a national cap on pokies.

The group say that if venues were held more responsible they would be more likely to help problem gamblers.
A 2010 Productivity Commission report into gambling stopped short of pushing statutory duty of care, finding that it would be hard to define and be slow and costly.

Clubs Australia spokesman Jeremy Bath said a more effective measure would be to compel gambling operators to extend venue bans on a person when asked to by a concerned family member.

''Common sense says the person who is best able to detect a gambling problem is the person who knows you best, and that is always going to be a close family member,'' Mr Bath said.

Other recommendations made by the inquiry include:
  •  examine ways financial institutions can assist in helping addicts stop gambling.
  •  fund a national problem gamblers hotline
  •  Making problem gambling a national research priority goal.

Current research at Swinburne University is trying to define symptons of problem gambling for the purpose of improving intervention strategies.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/extend-duty-of-care-to-pokies-mps-20121012-27hkx.html#ixzz295XWGG6d


Sunday, October 7, 2012

West Virginia: Bending the Rules




October 6, 2012
Statehouse Beat: Are gambling regulations being ignored?
The Charleston Gazette


CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- When the Lottery Commission recently approved a rule relaxing requirements to obtain casino privileges at The Greenbrier, Lottery Director John Musgrave said,

"We don't want buses pulling up and unloading folks just for the purpose of going to the casino."

Previously, only registered guests, members of The Greenbrier Sporting Club, or people registered to attend conferences or conventions but unable to find rooms at the hotel could gain access to the $80 million underground casino. The rule change expands that to include "special events" at the resort, such as The Greenbrier Classic golf tournament.

However, readers took the bus comment to heart, advising there are charter bus companies promoting day trips to The Greenbrier, with credits for video slots play as part of the package.

There are at least two companies operating out of Virginia, including Abbott Trailways of Roanoke, which advertises a Greenbrier Casino daytrip, with no fewer than 16 travel dates in October alone.

At $65 per person, the trip includes roundtrip motor coach transportation, a gourmet lunch at the hotel, and an October special of $25 of complimentary slots play. (Normally, the trip comps $15.)

Likewise, Sunshine Tours of Dublin, Va., lists 18 "Greenbrier Hotel One-Day Casino" trips this year, with trips this month on Oct. 6 and 20.

Sunshine's excursions leave from Richmond, Charlottesville and Staunton, and the company bills the trips as, "Monte Carlo meets "Gone with the Wind." The premier West Virginia casino combines high roller thrills and high-class style to create an unforgettable Greenbrier gaming experience."

Sunshine's trips are $75 per person, and include a gourmet lunch and $15 of complimentary slots play.

Musgrave said the Lottery Commission had also received calls after his buses comment was in the news. He said he made inquiries to The Greenbrier management, reminding them that admission to the gaming area for persons who are not guests at the hotel or participants in a conference or event at the resort is not allowed under the state historic resort gaming law.

"It has to be something other than just pulling up the bus," Musgrave said.

"It has to be a genuine event."

Musgrave said Greenbrier management said the resort is not permitting bus tours to bring day trip groups to the casino.

"They assured me that was not the case," he said.




Evidently, the argument comes down to whether lunch at The Greenbrier fits the definition of an event under Lottery Commission rules. It seems like a stretch from the original legislative intent to limit access to the casino to hotel guests only.

http://sundaygazettemail.com/News/201210050196

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Judge dismisses Dotty’s slot parlor lawsuit




Judge dismisses Dotty’s slot parlor lawsuit against Clark County


Image
Cindy Clark plays a slot machine at Dotty’s near Eastern and Serene in Henderson on Thursday, March 24, 2011.
 
Friday 21 September 2012
 
A federal judge on Friday threw out the Dotty’s tavern and slot parlor chain lawsuit against Clark County, ruling county commissioners have broad powers to regulate such locals’ gaming establishments.

Dotty’s and its sister company Jackpot Joanies sued the county in May 2011 after the County Commission required them and similar small businesses with gaming to build bars with at least eight embedded slot machines to ensure that gaming was an incidental part of the business model as opposed to being the key revenue driver.
 
Commissioners and state gaming regulators had fielded complaints about Dotty’s business model from Las Vegas locals’ casinos, which asserted Dotty’s was competing unfairly by not making the required investments in bars and kitchens like traditional gaming taverns.

Dotty’s, however, said it was filling a market niche preferred by women who liked its standalone gaming machines being clustered together in a living room-like atmosphere.

In its lawsuit, Dotty’s said its due process rights were violated because it had a property interest in its county gaming licenses and the new rules amounted to a ''back-door revocation'' of those licenses.

U.S. District Judge Kent Dawson rejected that argument in an order filed Friday, saying the county had not acted to restrict, remove or suspend those licenses.

"The county has a legitimate interest in promulgating ordinances that facilitate the proper use of gaming licenses. Regulations aimed at preventing misuse of restricted licenses and closing loopholes in licenses that provide only for 'incidental' gaming are well within the county’s purview," Dawson wrote in his order. "The county also has an interest in requiring that businesses with the privilege of holding a gaming license provide employment, services and amenities to the community. The court will not second guess the county’s determination that taverns operating under limited gaming licenses should comply with certain physical requirements, including having eight bar-top gaming devices, to enhance public welfare."

Dawson in his order said that Dotty’s attorneys, perhaps anticipating his ruling, had sought permission to file a new amended complaint. He gave them three weeks to do so.

A Dotty’s spokesman said the company was reviewing the ruling and had no immediate comment.

In pursuing their lawsuit last year, Dotty's attorneys noted the company had 21 taverns in Clark County alone.

''This was not an ordinance intended for general application or to cure a widespread problem,'' they complained of the new Clark County rules. ''It was targeted and engineered for the singular, overt, and illegal purpose of squelching a successful small business that the county’s well-heeled, big gaming constituents want to pillage of its loyal, slot-playing customers.''

Dotty’s separately in February voluntarily dismissed a similar lawsuit against the Nevada Gaming Commission over its rules regulating its business. The suit was dismissed for undisclosed reasons.

Dotty’s lately, with a new attorney, has been appearing before the Gaming Commission and the state Gaming Control Board and appears to be working to improve its working relationship with state casino regulators.

http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2012/sep/21/judge-dismisses-dottys-slot-parlor-lawsuit-against/
 
 

Saturday, September 15, 2012

More Woes for Casino



There are important similarities between the Cowlitz Tribe and the Mashpee Wampanoag/Genting proposal in Massachusetts.

The Mashpee Wampanoag/Genting proposal ignores the Tribe's lack of historical ties to Taunton, as well as their recent recognition, among other things.

The BIA's failures destroyed that fantasy.






In Our View: More Woes for Casino

Federal judge imposes deadline as Cowlitz Tribe and BIA lose momentum

 
Fortunately for Clark County residents who want to maintain the community's high quality of life, the Cowlitz Indian Tribe's proposal for a mega-casino near La Center has encountered yet another obstacle, this one placed by the federal agency that tribal officials have long hoped would champion their cause.As we've learned recently, the Bureau of Indian Affairs either lost or never reviewed important historical documents provided by casino opponents. That led the Justice Department to seek a delay in the federal proceedings.

But U.S. District Judge Richard W. Roberts recently denied that request and — to make matters worse for casino hopefuls and BIA official — set an Oct. 5 deadline for making a difficult choice:

The federal government must decide if it will defend itself in court or rescind the BIA's 2010 decision that supported the casino proposal, which lacked the crucial information from casino foes. Clearly, the BIA and tribal officials are backed into a corner by the federal agency's blunder, and the lingering reality that casino opponents are making a compelling case.

A year and a half ago The Columbian applauded the decision by several casino foes to appeal the BIA ruling to the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.

Those parties included Clark County, the city of Vancouver, owners of property near the proposed casino site on Interstate 5, La Center cardrooms and Citizens Against Reservation Shopping (CARS).

And now, that appeal reveals itself to be eminently valid. (Among CARS members is Columbian Publisher Scott Campbell. The newspaper has long opposed the proposed casino because it would negatively impact the local quality of life).

How the BIA could've lost or ignored key data provided by casino foes is a question that must be answered after close scrutiny by the U.S. Justice Department. For now, the second in a double whammy has been delivered to casino supporters.

The first haymaker was thrown by the worst recession in seven decades. Few visible efforts have been made by casino proponents in the past few years, no surprise considering the financial hole that all of America has been digging itself out of.

The second severe setback was this recent confusion and legal desperation within the BIA. According to a Thursday Columbian story by Stephanie Rice, some of the overlooked documents dispute tribal claims that the Cowlitz have historical ties to the land near La Center. That tribal argument was countered years ago, as revealed by these assertions we presented in a 2007 editorial: "Tribal headquarters are in Longview (Cowlitz County), a housing center is farther north in Toledo (Lewis County) and ample historical evidence" places the tribal homeland to the north of Clark County.

Another matter of dispute pertains to federal recognition. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2009 that the federal government can only put land into trust for tribes that were under federal jurisdiction in 1934. But the Cowlitz tribe was federally recognized in 2000.

Thus, we see the Cowlitz casino proposal sinking deeper into a regulatory abyss from which it might never escape. And that's good for Clark County.

http://www.columbian.com/news/2012/sep/14/more-woes-for-casino/

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Virtual sports betting comes to Facebook



Virtual sports betting comes to Facebook


RocketPlay Sportsbook and Sports Casino
RocketPlay has launched Sports Casino, an online casino for Facebook that operates only on virtual currency. (RocketPlay)

By Alex Pham
September 5, 2012

As president of a company that just came out with a game on Facebook called "Sports Casino," Matthew Cullen is surprisingly OK with the prospect that the U.S. is not likely to see legalized online gambling anytime soon.

Cullen's company, RocketPlay does, however, has put money on the odds that sports betting will be very popular on Facebook and other social platforms.

That's because their game is free to play and involves betting with virtual currency, not the real kind.

In many other respects, however, "Sports Casino" resembles many real-money online betting services that operate legally in the United Kingdom, where RocketPlay is based. Players can place bets on the outcome of hundreds of sports matches in college and professional football, baseball, hockey and basketball. (The company plans to add auto racing, cricket, rugby and other sports.)

They can also place bets while a game is happening. Will Matt Kemp hit a home run at his next turn at bat? Will USC score a touchdown during its next drive?

RocketPlay's betting system calculates the odds for each bet in real time, adjusting its payouts to the moment-to-moment action in the game.

In Europe, where these types of play-by-play bets are much more common than in Las Vegas, about 80% of overall bets are placed after a game kicks off, said Cullen, who knows this because he previously worked as a vice president of Betfair, a real-money online betting company in the U.K.

Once players run out of virtual currency, they can wait for the currency to slowly replenish over time for free. Or they buy more currency with real money, which is how RocketPlay plans to generate revenue.

“Sports Casino” is part of a suite of games in which betting is one component. In between sports matches, RocketPlay offers its players five other casino games to fill the idle time and keep its customers engaged.

One of those games is poker. Why?

"The audience for poker and sports betting are nearly identical," Cullen said.

It's no surprise, then, that RocketPlay partnered with Zynga, whose Texas Hold'em poker game is the most popular on Facebook. The agreement calls for Zynga to publish RocketPlay's games both on Facebook and on Zynga.com, where Zynga can drive traffic to RocketPlay's games in exchange for a piece of the revenue generated by those titles. The specific terms of the publishing deal, however, is confidential.

Zynga and other social gaming companies are eager to learn more about online gambling, which is said to generate more than $30 billion a year in revenue worldwide, roughly three times the annual sales of social games. Facebook this summer worked with GameSys to launch a real-money bingo game in the U.K. called "Bingo Frenzy."

In December, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a memo suggesting that selling lottery tickets across state lines over the Internet might be considered legal under the Federal Wire Act. Some in the gaming industry believe that to be an opening for online poker in the U.S. involving real-money stakes, and possibly other forms of online gambling.

But Cullen says that day is so far off that he's not willing to bet any money on that prospect.

"That's just fine with us," he said. "If the market remains closed to real-money betting here, that will be good for us, because that will mean people will play with our offering instead."

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-virtual-sports-betting-facebook-20120904,0,206335.story

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Michigan Casino Referendum Struck Down





Bridge, union rights & tax votes will appear in November election
Sep 5, 2012

Written by Stanton Tang

LANSING, Mich. (Paul Egan and Dawson Bell, Detroit Free Press) - The Michigan Supreme Court today ordered three challenged ballot proposals onto the Nov. 6 ballot but blocked a fourth -- a proposal to authorize eight more Michigan casinos.

The court's decision means voters will be asked to decide the fate of five proposed constitutional amendments and whether to retain one state law (on emergency managers) when they go to the polls this fall, the busiest state ballot in a generation.

The three proposals ordered on the ballot today by the court would require a statewide vote on a new public bridge to Canada, enshrine collective bargaining rights in the constitution, and require a two-thirds legislative supermajority for state tax increases. Two others - to protect the unionization of home health care workers and increase renewable energy standards - and a referendum on the emergency manager law had already been certified.

Today's decision was unanimous, except for a split on the casino proposal, which the 4-3 majority declared could not be certified because its drafters failed to warn petition signers and potential voters that it would diminish authority written into the existing constitution for the Liquor Control Commission.

In today's ruling, the court emphasized that it was important not to erect artificial barriers to the right of citizens to amend the constitution by petition drive (as each of the proposals does).

Opponents had sought to bar the proposals from the ballot, arguing that their drafters had failed to include language identifying other sections of the constitution that would be affected by their adoption, thereby leaving petition signers and potential voters in the dark about their implications.

But the court said that only when an amendment directly changes an existing provision or nullifies it altogether was the so-called re-publication of the existing provision required.

Today's ruling could have far-reaching implications for future ballot initiatives, as the justices tried to spell out a clear set of guidelines for aspiring petitioners to follow.

In the short term, it means the loss of several millions of dollars in television advertising that was anticipated in a showdown between the casino expansionists and defenders of existing casinos in Detroit and those owned by Indian tribes.

Emily Palsrok, a spokeswoman for the group pushing expansion, said the court's decision was disappointing, but an only temporary setback.

The liquor license language contained in the proposed amendment (and identified as a fatal flaw by the court) was not an essential part of the proposal, and can easily be re-written, she said.

"We'll be back," Palsrok said.

The court heard oral arguments on the cases on Thursday.

The Board of State Canvassers has scheduled a Friday meeting to finalize the Nov. 6 ballot, just ahead of the final deadline for doing so.



http://www.wzzm13.com/news/article/224163/2/Court-dumps-casino-question-from-Michigan-ballot

Saturday, June 23, 2012

The Insanity of Expanded Gambling!



From our friends at NoPlainvilleRacino who also offered this:

Plainridge is a money loser: According to The Boston Globe, Plainridge was initially profitable but has become a money loser over the past five years, and needs the extra revenue that slot machines would generate to keep the facility afloat. Plainridge’s investors, namely a Las Vegas slot machine tycoon who owns 31% of the track, have pumped at least $32 million into the track over the past decade - and that may soon hit $35 million. Since then, each year has brought additional losses, with Plainridge’s backers subsidizing the money-losing operation as interest steadily dropped in live horse racing. How can we expect Plainridge to be successful with a highly complex slot operation if they cannot even make money with their current business venture? What has Plainridge's management been doing since the track opened - “We have been here for 14 years watching paint dry. This is getting exciting. This is light speed.” - says Gary Piontkowski, Plainridge Racecourse's President.


Illinois video comments worth seeing:

"Gambling is a JOB KILLER...A recent federal commission study indicated every slot machine [...] eats about $300,000 of LOST consumer spending from the economy, every year."

CHAMPAIGN--Supporters of a legalized gambling expansion bill that passed the Illinois Senate last week aren't celebrating quite yet. Governor Pat Quinn is strongly suggesting he won't sign the bill saying he objects to the lack of regulation measures. ABC Newschannel 15's Liz Lohuis stepped out of the world of politics and into the world of education to dig deeper into the issue of gambling.Gaming Expansion: Job Creator or Job Killer?
Monday, June 4 2012


http://www.wicd15.com/newsroom/top_stories/videos/wicd_vid_5329.shtml