Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Showing posts with label UNREGISTERING AND ILLEGAL PAC IN PALMER?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UNREGISTERING AND ILLEGAL PAC IN PALMER?. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Mohegan Sun: The Answer is still NO!

You rock, Palmer!




By Lori Stabile, The RepublicanThe Republican
on November 26, 2013


PALMER -- Tuesday's recount for Mohegan Sun's resort casino proposal reaffirmed the Nov. 5 vote defeated the prospect of a Palmer gaming resort.

Only one vote changed. The vote was 2,657 no to 2,563 yes, a 94-vote difference.

The Board of Registrars met at 9 a.m. today to start the recount. The previous vote was 2,657 against the casino to 2,564 for it - a 93 vote loss.

After the opening of the meeting, Town Clerk Susan Coache went with Palmer Police officer Brian P. McNally and Detective Sgt. Scott E. Haley to the Town Building to retrieve the ballots, and bring them back to the library to be hand counted. The 5,221 ballots were brought inside in four large, black, locked boxes.

Four tables were set up for the counting, and were cordoned off with yellow caution tape.

Sitting outside the cordoned off area were casino supporters and members of the anti-casino group, as well as members of the media. Inside the counting area, the two groups could have representatives watch the proceedings, and they could challenge ballots if they wished.

By 10:45 a.m., there already had been several challenges regarding ballots, which put a halt to the counting process. Challenged ballots were brought to the registrars for review. The registrars were sitting at a table in the cordoned off area.

The counters were counting the ballots in blocks of 50. Finance Director John Kuzmiski was there to do the final tally.

Town lawyer Charles F. Ksieniewicz explained at the onset of the recount that the ballots would be brought to the tables one block at a time, and asked the spectators to be quiet. At 11 a.m., he said that in the interest of time, he would let counting continue at the other tables if a challenge occurred.

Mohegan Sun, of Connecticut, wanted to build a billion-dollar casino for Thorndike Street (Route 32), overlooking the Massachusetts Turnpike interchange. After the defeat on Nov. 5, Mohegan's chief executive said he would seek a recount.

Problems with a precinct 2 voting machine and potential voter irregularities were some of the concerns cited by Mohegan representatives regarding the election and the need for a recount.


http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2013/11/mohegan_sun_casino_recount_res.html

 

Friday, November 22, 2013

Still, no one asks about illegal Palmer PAC!


Not one single media source has asked where the $$$ for

Citizens for Jobs and Growth in Palmer 

comes from, why they are NOT a registered PAC and no reporting is available.

Northeast Realty: Mohegan Sun wants to break exclusive casino agreement, but continue to lease Palmer land


Palmer rejects Mohegan Sun Casino
11/05/13 Palmer - Mohegan Sun supporters in Palmer await results on Nov. 5. (The Republican / Michael Beswick)
Lori Stabile, The Republican By Lori Stabile, The RepublicanThe Republican
on November 21, 2013
 

Casinos



PALMER - Mohegan Sun wants to end its exclusive casino agreement with Northeast Realty but continue to lease the 152 acres on Thorndike Street (Route 32), making it unavailable for other economic or casino development, Northeast representatives said Thursday.

The news comes amid several calls for Mohegan to answer to rumors that the Connecticut-based company may be involved in talks with Suffolk Downs for its Revere casino proposal, even though a recount of the failed Palmer vote has not yet been held.

The recount is slated for Tuesday.

"Clearly if Mohegan is trying to void the exclusivity agreement, they clearly have interest somewhere else in Massachusetts," At-large Town Councilor Paul E. Burns said.

Burns said it is "insulting" to Palmer to "come in here and run the kind of campaign they did and walk away and try to hold that land forever," a move that could prevent economic development, or another casino company from coming in.

Mohegan signed a 99-year lease with Northeast on the 152 acres in 2008, with the hope that it could build a resort casino there. But voters on Nov. 5 rejected the casino by less than 100 votes.

A statement issued by Northeast reads in part: "It is unfortunate that Mohegan Sun is abandoning the people of Palmer just days before the recount of the recent referendum, so that it can continue to negotiate a possible deal in another locale in Massachusetts, now that those negotiations have come to light through press reports.

"Mohegan’s pursuit of a license in the Eastern Massachusetts zone is at odds with their long-held position that Palmer represents the best location for a resort casino in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. It also violated the exclusivity agreement between the parties."

But the company on Tuesday issued a statement in response to Burns' concerns about Suffolk, calling his statements false, inappropriate and hurtful.

Leon H. Dragone, Northeast's manager, wants to know if Mohegan was engaged in discussions or negotiations with Suffolk before the Nov. 5 vote.

"I think that would call into question the integrity of their management of the campaign," Dragone said.

Sources close to Northeast said Mohegan could give 90 days notice to get out of the lease.

A Suffolk representative said their goal is to identify a new gaming partner by the end of the month.
Chip Tuttle, chief operating officer of Suffolk Downs, confirmed on Thursday that Mohegan Sun is among several companies that have discussed partnering with Suffolk Downs on a revised casino proposal in Revere.

The release from Northeast, which came from Paul Robbins Associates, blasts Mohegan, saying the pursuit of another license in Revere "represents another demonstration of Mohegan's pattern of underperformance relating to the town of Palmer and its citizens."

It notes that while Mohegan was the first applicant to establish a presence in Western Massachusetts and pledged to be the first to have a host community agreement and referendum, it "supplied the required $400,000 application fee at the eleventh hour" and was slow to reveal casino project details despite requests to do so by town officials and citizens.

“Mohegan was among the last to finalize a host community agreement, after publicly promising to be the first. They were among the last to bring the agreement to voters. Unlike their counterpart applicants, they did not seek community input in Palmer or engage the people of Palmer in the design of their proposed resort.

“At the end of the day, Mohegan was slow to act and seemingly more interested in protecting their flagship casino in Connecticut than vigorously pursuing the Palmer project. Now, with the Palmer vote still undetermined they appear anxious to apply through a host community agreement and referendum that they did not have to win on their own," Northeast's release states.

The release also stated that during the negotiations with Northeast on the Palmer land lease, Northeast was aware of reports that Mohegan was actively looking at other venues in Massachusetts, and that Mohegan paid former mayor Michael Albano as a consultant during this period and continued to pay him as a consultant until he took office as a Governor’s Councilor.

"It is unclear what Mr. Albano’s role with Mohegan Sun was during the period of time he was paid as their consultant in Massachusetts, but it is very clear he was not involved in the Palmer referendum campaign,” Robbins added in the statement, citing the alleged arrangement as another example of Mohegan’s duplicity.

Albano, of Longmeadow, was elected to the Governor’s Council in 2011. Recently, he won a $10,000 contract with the town of East Longmeadow to advise municipal officials on the potential impact on the community if an MGM resort casino is located in Springfield.

In response, Albano said, “I haven’t seen Paul Robbins in 12 years, and if I have it wasn’t that memorable of a meeting but I now understand now why he left political consulting,” refusing further comment.

Albano previously denied having been compensated by Mohegan or any related entity.
Officials for the casino company and the tribe did not return calls for comment.

Citizens for Jobs and Growth in Palmer, a pro-casino group, released a letter sent to the Mohegan Tribal Council this week that was signed by 24 people asking Mohegan to adjust the host community agreement to reflect "core groups in town, like the teachers" and to continue to negotiate with surrounding communities.

Jennifer L. Baruffaldi, a spokeswoman for the group, said they still want to see a casino project happen at that site, and would support another casino operator coming in. She said she is concerned about Mohegan being involved with Suffolk Downs.

"If they started courting somebody else, it's like leaving a bride at the altar," Baruffaldi said.

Staff writer Stephanie Barry and the Associated Press contributed to this report.



This is a developing story that will be updated as our reporting continues.

http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2013/11/northeast_realty_mohegan_sun_w.html



Company of the Month: Finard Properties marches forth - A trademark style of doing business

Boston, MA While the news that the residents of Palmer, Mass. had (slimly) voted down Mohegan Sun Casino's proposal for a world-class destination casino resort came as a disappointment to Todd Finard, the ambitious CEO of Finard Properties, the Boston-based, commercial real estate development company in partnership with Mohegan, didn't miss a beat. The next day, he and Mitchell Etess, CEO of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming authority, were meeting to discuss the possibility of keeping their partnership in tact - all while awaiting the re-count of the Palmer vote, which was scheduled later in the month. With a solid and sound partnership in place, Finard and Mohegan wasted no time mourning the potential defeat in Palmer, and instead scheduled a trip to Pennsylvania to tour Mohegan's existing operation in the Poconos.

"Finard Properties is and has been successful because we see opportunity, first and foremost - and we see a tremendous opportunity in continuing a strong partnership with Mohegan Sun," said Finard.

"We are excited to get back to the table and are optimistic that down the road, we can work together to develop a premiere tourist destination in the State of Massachusetts."

"There isn't a better, more experienced and more successful retail developer than Finard Properties," said Etess. "The portfolio of hugely successful Finard Properties' developments is spread literally throughout every corner of New England and beyond. Their creativity and expertise is a huge asset to our continued pursuit of a casino complex in Massachusetts."

This "march forth" style of doing business is trademark Finard and is one of the reasons for the company's impressive growth since its humble beginnings.

Founded in the 1950s, Murray Finard recognized an opportunity to simplify the shopping experience for the masses that were migrating to suburbia: he put all the stores under one roof. It wasn't long before shopping centers were a cornerstone of just about every town in America.

In the 1970s, Murray was joined in the business by his son Bill, who carried the company to the next level by adding new property development /property management components and evolving strategically with an ever-shifting demographic and the continuing influx of new technology. His son, Todd, came aboard in 1996; his son-in-law, Robert Hughes, also joined the company in 2007.

Now three generation out, the company is aggressively pursuing growth, yet firmly adhering to its core values of integrity and forthright business practices - and the pride that comes with the fact that the company bears the family name. Characterized by innovation, insight, creative out-of-the-box thinking and good old-fashioned hard work, Finard Properties "marches forth" with its commitment to identify new opportunities for growth and constantly evolve into new markets and into new marketplaces.

As CEO, Todd Finard is responsible for the strategic planning and ongoing growth of the company's portfolio. He has outlined a carefully-executed plan for expansion - one which includes bringing in capital for projects they have on the table. Finard recognizes that the company's projections for an accelerated growth trajectory require that they actively court institutional investors and joint equity partners. "In exchange for access to capital, we offer great yields," said Finard. "We have targeted projects that, once developed, marketed and managed correctly will very likely exceed conservative estimates for return. We have a portfolio of properties that our market analysis tells us should be developed."

Finard also spearheaded the company's move into downtown Boston in 2011. "We saw the upside to being closer to our financial partners," he said.

While their short term goal is to finalize a deal with Mohegan Sun, Finard Properties remains focused and committed to the properties they own and manage in all sectors.

Hospitality

Formed in 2011, Finard Coventry Hotel Management merged the talents of Finard Properties with those of Coventry Hotel Associates and offers a full spectrum of services for the hospitality industry - from acquisition and development to operations, franchisor relations, asset management, strategic sales/marketing plans and consulting. FCHM currently owns and/or manages: The Harbor Hotel, Provincetown, Mass.; The Sundance Resort, Sundance, UT; The Providence Biltmore (which is currently undergoing a $13 million restoration in a joint venture with Angelo, Gordon & Company) and has recently announced their newest project: a 170-room Residence Inn at the New England Executive Park in Burlington, Mass. Groundbreaking is set for the summer of 2014.

Retail

In the mid-1980s, the First National Bank of Boston approached William Finard about taking over two under-performing shopping malls in Memphis, Tenn. If this born and bred New Englander felt out of place in the South, it didn't show; Finard turned both into successful retail assets. Finard Properties is still at it: the company recently razed a portion of one of the complexes and has just completed the construction of an 85,000 s/f Kroger's, a strong anchor for the newly refurbished shopping center. "This is just one example of how the company has its finger on the pulse of the properties we own and/or manage," said Todd Finard. "In this case, the property had reached the point where it could go one of two ways. It was 30 or 40-years-old and needed to be recreated to be vital and profitable. We are constantly evaluating the landscape of the markets we are in and the markets where we see as emerging. This is another way to spot opportunity and remain active in competitive markets."

The University Mall in South Burlington, Vt. is another major, retail redevelopment project that is on Finard's white board. The largest enclosed mall in the state, the complex is a classic 1980s mall, according to Finard. The company is considering the future evolution of the mall, one that will keep it exciting to shoppers and attractive to tenants.

Office

Finard Properties' portfolio of office complexes includes sites in New England and Tennessee. As with all the properties they own and manage, Finard is ready to spring into action when market conditions dictate a change. Take for instance One Monument Square in downtown Portland, Me. When this 10-story, 124,000 s/f office building lost its key tenant last year, Finard recognized the need to refurbish the 1970s design in order to be competitive and attract the right mix of long-term tenants. Along with the major renovation, the building was rebranded, renamed (Square One) and is now nearly fully occupied.

Three generations have successfully steered Finard Properties from owning one humble shopping center to owning, managing and developing an impressive portfolio of properties in nearly every sector of commercial real estate. They are, for sure, a company to watch for generations to come.

http://nerej.com/67460

 

Sunday, October 27, 2013

UNREGISTERED AND ILLEGAL PAC IN PALMER? MEDIA SILENT?

Mohegan Sun is another monster mired in debt.

Sun's Mass. casino vote may be too close to call
By Brian Hallenbeck
Publication: The Day

Published 10/27/2013
 
Palmer, Mass. - For more than 15 years, people here have confronted the prospect of a resort casino in their midst.

In polls and in a nonbinding referendum, they've supported the notion. But now, on the verge of a Nov. 5 vote on Mohegan Sun's plan for a $1 billion casino-water park development, few are eager to predict the outcome.

It's no longer about a notion, they say. This referendum's binding.

If the pro-casino "Vote Yes for Palmer" forces out-poll their "CasiNO" counterparts, Mohegan Sun and its partners will continue to pursue the western Massachusetts casino license Bay State gaming
regulators are expected to award in the spring.

If project opponents prevail, Mohegan Sun can close its Main Street office and get out of town.

"We've done two or three polls out there in the past and every one showed overwhelming support for hosting a casino in Palmer," Clyde Barrow, director of the Center for Policy Analysis at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, said last week. "But we've seen over and over that even when polls show large margins in favor of casinos, the actual votes are a lot closer. Opponents are often more motivated (than proponents) to come out and actually vote."

So while polls conducted in Palmer in 2008, 2009 and 2010 revealed growing support for a casino - percentages in favor were 55, 60 and 64 percent, respectively - Barrow is banking on an Election Day nail-biter.

"I think it will be decided by 1 or 2 percent," he said. "Right now, the polls in the past indicate it should pass."

Paul Burns, one of two town councilors who have come out in support of the Mohegan Sun Massachusetts project, believes the town's long-running consideration of a casino is another reason the vote's unlikely to be lopsided.

While Paul Burns has been prime casino cheerleaders [perhaps violating Massachusetts Ethics Rules], he helped bury the Palmer Citizens Casino Study Committee Report that determined the annual cost to host would exceed the phony promises. 

And what about the WATER?

"Palmer has studied it more than any other community," Burns said. "I wouldn't be upset with a tight margin - it would just be a sign that people have done their homework. When you have an extremely informed electorate, they're not going to be easily swayed.

"Don't look for an Everett margin here," he said, referring to a June referendum in the Greater Boston city of Everett, where more than 86 percent of voters approved Wynn Resorts' casino proposal. "In Everett, they didn't have time to study it."

While he'd be happy with a narrow victory, Burns said he thinks Palmer voters will approve the Mohegan Sun Massachusetts proposal by a margin of 8 to 10 percentage points. He predicted a turnout of 32 percent to 40 percent, which he said would be "huge" for a local election. No offices are up for election. Ballots will pose only the casino question.

Members of Quaboag Valley Against Casinos, the leading anti-casino group operating in Palmer, say they've been gaining momentum. They acknowledge, too, that they're fighting an uphill battle.

"We're a silent majority," said Iris Cardin, the group's co-president. "We're coming out now. There are more anti-casino people than in the past. ... No one expected Hard Rock to be defeated."

Cardin's underdog opposition might have gotten a boost, at least psychologically, from a September referendum in West Springfield, where voters shot down a Hard Rock International casino proposal by a 55-45 margin. That outcome narrowed the field vying for the western Massachusetts casino license to two: Mohegan Sun Massachusetts and MGM Resorts International, which won a July referendum on its Springfield project with nearly 58 percent of the vote.

"I've lived here all my life," the 67-year-old Cardin said. "We're a family-oriented town. Why would we want a casino to ruin it?"

Mike Eagan, a spokesman for Cardin's group, said casino opponents have been making inroads.
"I think we're doing well," he said on a recent Saturday, picketing at the busy intersection of Thorndike and Main streets. "The more you know about a casino, the more unlikely it is that you're going to want one in your community."

Economic benefits, social costs

While casino opponents typically focus on the quality-of-life issues associated with gambling - addiction, crime, traffic and casinos' effects on surrounding small businesses - casino operators tout the revenue and jobs they generate. Governments tend to find the promise of economic benefits irresistible.

Mohegan Sun's "host community agreement" with Palmer, for example, seemed to more than satisfy town officials. The pact calls for the casino to dole out nearly $3 million in upfront payments, as well as annual payments of $15.2 million plus 0.25 percent of the casino's first $400 million in gaming revenue and 2 percent of the revenue beyond $400 million.

Based on Mohegan Sun's projections, total casino revenue for Palmer would top $18 million in the casino's first year of operation.

In addition, the agreement calls for Mohegan Sun to foot the bill for more than $41 million worth of infrastructure improvements to water and sewer systems, the Exit 8 interchange of the Massachusetts Turnpike and local roadways.

The town has an annual budget of about $33 million, of which $15.3 million is derived from local property taxes, according to Charlie Blanchard, the town manager.

After tapping the projected casino windfall to cover "mitigation" costs - expenses incurred because of the casino's impact on services such as police and fire protection - the town still would have more than $12 million a year at its disposal to fund improvements and lower property taxes, Blanchard has calculated.

If the Town Council raised the budget of each town department, including schools, by 15 percent, reduced sewer fees by 10 percent, paid for the town's new police station, funded a bridge repair program and put $1 million a year into the town's "Stabilization Fund," it could still cut property taxes by more than 40 percent, the town manager wrote in an op-ed piece last month.

"There may be reasons why people would decide not to vote in favor of having a casino in Palmer," Blanchard wrote, "… but the host community agreement and the fiscal improvement it would bring should not be one of them."

Mitchell Etess, chief executive officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, which operates Mohegan Sun in Uncasville and Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., said the project's economic impact on the town would be "truly transformative."

He said he's "very confident" that Palmer will vote in favor of the "once-in-a-lifetime" opportunity the project represents. "I don't know of anything that could be built anywhere that could have so much beneficial impact on a community," he said. "And we've made every effort to minimize the
(negative) impact."

If signs voted

The town's casino supporters, many of whom are members of Citizens for Jobs and Growth in Palmer, have been monitoring the casino-approval process for years. The group formed in the spring of 2010 and has been working in conjunction with Mohegan Sun's own "Vote Yes for Palmer" campaign since the signing of the host community agreement.

WHERE IS Citizens for Jobs and Growth
 REGISTERED AS A PAC?
WHERE IS Citizens for Jobs and Growth
REPORTING THEIR $$$$?

WHERE IS Citizens for Jobs and Growth
TRANSPARENT AND LEGAL?

WHO IS PAYING JENNIFER BARUFFALDI'S SALARY?

WHO IS ASKING? WHY ISN'T THE MEDIA CONDUCTING THEIR DUE DILIGENCE?

"We're happy to carry their signs," Jennifer Baruffaldi, the citizens group's spokeswoman, said.
If signs could vote, the referendum outcome would seem assured. In recent weeks, pro-casino placards planted on residential lawns and in merchants' windows have overwhelmingly outnumbered those placed by casino opponents.

Both sides also have taken to Facebook and the radio airwaves, staged public rallies and courted news coverage. Quaboag Valley Against Casinos hosted an appearance this month by former southeastern Connecticut congressman Robert Steele, whose book, "The Curse: Big Time Gambling's Seduction of Small Town New England," takes a dim view of gaming's impact.

Cardin, the anti-casino group's co-president, said Steele warned that a Palmer casino would make it difficult for small businesses in the surrounding area to survive.

It might be hard to dispute, however, that the Mohegan Sun Massachusetts project is spurring ancillary development right next door. Northeast Realty, which owns the property leased by Mohegan Sun, also controls adjacent parcels totaling another 150 acres on which it plans to develop restaurants, retail space, hotels and offices requiring $150 million worth of investment.

The development is going forward regardless of whether the Mohegan Sun Massachusetts project materializes, according to Northeast's manager, Leon Dragone.

Those on both sides of the referendum question might agree that the Nov. 5 vote is strictly about Palmer's willingness to host Mohegan Sun Massachusetts.

"It has absolutely nothing to do with West Springfield or Springfield," said Etess, the MTGA executive, who declined to comment on reports that West Springfield activists who opposed the casino project there have joined the pro-casino camp in Palmer. Presumably, such activists would prefer a casino to be built in Palmer rather than Springfield.

If Mohegan Sun Massachusetts clears the referendum hurdle, the project's proponents can be expected to concentrate on comparing it - favorably - to MGM Resorts' Springfield proposal. They undoubtedly would highlight the Mohegan Sun project's water park component and the way the project partners sailed through the gaming commission's background checks, earning "suitable" designations.

The suitability process snagged the Suffolk Downs casino plan in East Boston, prompting the license applicants to drop Caesars Entertainment from the project and raising questions about whether other international operators, including MGM Resorts, would have trouble passing muster with the commission.

Casino opponents in Palmer aren't going to disappear if they lose the referendum vote. Many, including Cardin, the Quaboag Valley Against Casinos co-president, are also involved in an effort to repeal the 2011 law that authorized casinos in Massachusetts. The citizen's group Repeal the Casino Deal is hoping to have a referendum question placed on statewide ballots in the November 2014 election.


http://www.theday.com/article/20131027/BIZ02/310279905/1017