One of the problems with "Indian Gambling" is the Sovereign Rights of Tribes to reneg on legitimate debts and agreements.
El Dorado County Court Issues Tentative Ruling on $30 Million Judgment
The El Dorado County Superior Court issued a tentative ruling this week that would prevent Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. from collecting on its $30 million judgment against the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians (Tribe) while it appeals the judgment to a higher court.
In an effort to overturn the ruling in favor of the Tribe, Sharp's attorneys argued on a theory that Red Hawk Casino's revenues could be collected without consideration of the bondholders' prior rights, because the bond indenture had not been approved by the federal government and was, therefore, invalid.
"We are confident the Court will stand by its original ruling, and reject Sharp's effort to collect on a judgment while we appeal to a higher court," said Nicholas Fonseca, Chairman of the Tribe. "The fact is the federal agency that oversees gaming contracts confirmed that our bond indenture was, in fact, valid. So that's the end of it."
The Court has given the Tribe an opportunity to address Sharp's arguments in written briefing, and the Tribe will present the documentation demonstrating the agency's action. The matter should be resolved within weeks.
SHINGLE SPRINGS RANCHERIA
Jury verdict may force Red Hawk Casino's closure, Shingle Springs tribe says
By Dale Kasler
The owners of Red Hawk Casino say they may have to close the 3-year-old gambling palace following a devastating $30 million jury verdict.
With its financial pressures intensifying, the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians warned in court papers of a "doomsday scenario" if the cash-poor tribe is forced to pay the December judgment. Under that scenario, the tribe said lenders would take steps to seize the casino's cash, forcing Red Hawk out of business.
"Any efforts to presently execute on the judgment would likely have catastrophic consequences for the tribe and all who depend on the casino for their livelihood," tribal attorney Sanford Kingsley wrote in a recent filing in El Dorado Superior Court.
The Shingle Springs casino employs 1,350 workers.
A jury in December awarded $30 million to Sharp Image Gaming Inc., the tribe's former business partner, over a breach-of-contract dispute. Sharp said the tribe reneged on an agreement for the company to supply slot machines.
Sharp Image lawyer Matthew Jacobs called the tribe's shutdown warning nonsense. He said in court papers that the tribe's creditors would do everything they could to keep the Highway 50 facility going.
For now, Sharp Image won't collect on the judgment. A judge issued a tentative ruling this week preserving the status quo, the tribe said Friday. A final ruling on the issue is expected in a couple of weeks.
Nevertheless, the tribe's warning provides fresh evidence of the dire financial circumstances that have enveloped the Shingle Springs band, which owes its casino creditors a combined $598 million.
Because of its financial troubles, the tribe said it's having trouble pursuing an appeal of the December verdict. If the verdict stands, the tribe could default on its debts.
The tribe's warning also makes it increasingly likely that the casino's future will be the subject of a lengthy and convoluted legal battle, with bondholders and other creditors fighting the tribe and each other over assets.
This fight will surely be complicated by the doctrine of sovereign immunity, which generally protects tribes against legal claims and puts the Shingle Springs tribe's most important assets – including the casino – out of creditors' reach.
"You can't take their land, you can't take the building," said Nelson Rose, an Indian gambling law expert at Whittier College. "I guess you could take the slot machines."
Gregory Guedel, an Indian gambling lawyer in Seattle who is not connected to the case, said bondholders and other creditors will probably have to negotiate a settlement with the tribe to stretch out debt payments while keeping the casino open.
That's what happened at tribal-owned Foxwoods Casino in Connecticut – the world's largest – which defaulted on $2 billion in debts two years ago.
Aside from the hurdles presented by the tribe's sovereign status, it simply makes more sense for creditors to work out a deal with the tribe.
"It's still better to have a trickle of money coming in" than to have the casino fold, Guedel said.
As it is, the tribe has temporarily halted principal payments on a $66 million startup loan from Red Hawk's outside management firm, Lakes Entertainment Inc., because of the casino's weak cash flow.
Red Hawk pays millions of dollars each year to the state and El Dorado County under a compact that the Shingle Springs band signed with former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
"It would be unfortunate, certainly, if they went out of business," said Terri Daly, chief administrative officer for El Dorado County. "They're a good employer in the county."
For the impoverished Indian tribe that owns it, however, the casino has been anything but a winner. Since its December 2008 opening, gambling revenue has fallen about $100 million a year short of the tribe's projections, according to trial testimony. Individual tribal members are receiving $800 a month in profit distributions.
At times, the casino doesn't produce enough profit to meet the $500,000 monthly minimum guaranteed to the tribe – forcing Lakes Entertainment to loan the tribe money, according to Lakes' filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Those monthly loans from Lakes are separate from the $66 million startup loan.
The $30 million jury verdict has turned the tribe's troubles into a full-blown crisis. Court records show the verdict, if it stands, could trigger a default on the tribe's single biggest debt – a $450 million bond.
Moody's Investors Service last month lowered its ratings outlook on the tribe's gambling authority from "stable" to "negative," citing the possibility of bond default. The gambling authority's credit rating is Caa2, which Moody's defines as a "high credit risk."
The tribe wants to appeal the El Dorado County jury verdict but first needs to post a $45 million bond – one and a half times the judgment for Sharp Image. Because most of its casino revenue is pledged to other creditors, and the casino is legally off-limits, the tribe said in court papers it doesn't have the "free and clear assets required as collateral" to acquire the bond.
Lawyers for the tribe have asked Superior Court Judge Nelson Brooks to waive the bond requirement. Jacobs, the lawyer for Sharp Image, has objected, saying that the tribe is exaggerating its financial problems.
"The tribe's prediction of economic catastrophe is purely speculative," he wrote in a court filing.
After making a tentative ruling this week in the tribe's favor, Brooks is expected to make a final decision soon.
Guedel said shutdowns of tribal casinos are rare but not unprecedented. The Lucky Dog Casino in Washington state, owned by the Skokomish Tribe, closed in September 2009. Tribal officials blamed the recession.
The casino reopened 10 months later, however.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/25/4289725/jury-verdict-may-force-red-hawk.html#storylink=cpy
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Sovereign Rights to Reneg on Agreements
Labels:
California,
Foxwoods,
Indian Casinos,
Red Hawk,
Sovereignty,
Tribal Casinos,
tribal default
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment