To the editor: Dale Bergevine misrepresents me ("Gambling foes can't have it both ways," Monday, June 25):
First, I've fought expanded predatory gambling for years. I've worked against the Lottery - a regressive tax on the most vulnerable in our society - since 1980.
In my letter of June 19, I simply made the point that even the chair of the state gaming commission has concerns about local aid diminishing whenever and wherever a slot barn is licensed. That doesn't mean I support the Lottery; I was trying to provide information.
I've spoken with many legislators and experts in the field - pro and con. I did what a good citizen does: I educated myself, learned about what comes with expanded predatory gambling, gave testimony to the Legislature when it debated the gambling bill, and became active in my community and my state to oppose something I fear will be extremely detrimental.
As a board member of United to Stop Slots in Massachusetts, I support groups opposed to slots around the commonwealth. Unfortunately, when I oppose slots elsewhere, I'm called a "carpetbagger"; in my own town I'm accused of NIMBY. (If I lived on South Street, would I be entitled to an opinion?)
I've seen the ravages of predatory gambling up close; the decimation doesn't stop "within a half mile" of a casino. Those living within a half mile will see our property values decrease most, and we will endure the noise, light and air pollution, but we won't be the only ones to suffer the impact.
Why have I exposed myself to abuse, ridicule, and vandalism in this struggle?
Because I believe the slot barn will have a deleterious effect on our town.
Period. Yes, Plainville will see short- term revenue from the spoils of predatory gambling (our "Enabler's Fee"). But the long-term costs have yet to be determined. As a citizen, I think it's my job to question that. Wherever I live.
On the other hand, Mr. Bergevine insists that Plainridge and the state are offering our town, "Beneficial, positive changes ... in a nice, neat package."
Isn't it pretty to think so?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment