Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Casino crime spree



Casino crime spree

 

Questions for legislators about casino gambling



LETTER: Questions for legislators about casino gambling



Published: Wednesday, May 08, 2013

Dear Editor:

When Gov. Cuomo in 2012 proposed new commercial casinos, he said they would need regulation. Likely reasons: (a) mitigate problem gambling, (b) protect against cheating and organized crime.

Casino owners want regulation about as much as do big banks: the least possible. Regulation hurts profits by constraining practices (e.g. payday loans) and limiting externalities, costs of doing business that are passed to society at large. A company no longer free to discharge waste into a river faces new costs; paying them may lose it business if competitors avoid similar restrictions and don’t raise their prices. Casinos, in business only for profit, hate to absorb fiscal burdens they have always externalized, like the socioeconomic costs of problem gambling.

The central statistic of casinos: Grinols and Omorow (J. Law and Commerce, Vol. 16, 1997) estimated that 50 percent of the gross revenues after winnings are paid out (about half the profit) comes from compulsive and problem gamblers -- about 4 percent of the adult population -- who comprise less than 10 percent of casino customers.

From this statistic follows the ethical dilemma: If casinos steered all the pathological and problem gamblers in their sphere into lasting recovery and prevented the creation of any new ones, profits would drop by 50 percent. How would that play on the bottom line? Not well at all. What to do?

Solution: Express concern about problem gambling with a façade of "prevention" methods structured to fail. Accede gracefully to toothless "regulation."

Legislators weighing "second passage" of a bill meant to legalize new casinos in New York by amending the constitution through public referendum must ask three questions:

•Would those casinos work really hard to profit 50 pecrent less than many others do? That’s obvious: No

•Do I really believe this state can and will properly regulate casinos if they don’t want it and the state shares in their profits? Another no.

•Is it fair to state residents to commend to them by a "Yes" on second passage, a sham I don’t believe in. No.

Tell your assemblyman and state senator to vote no on second passage.

STEPHEN Q. SHAFER
Saugerties

The writer is chairman of the Coalition Against Gambling in New York.

http://www.dailyfreeman.com/articles/2013/05/08/opinion/doc51880f1920595268572155.txt?viewmode=fullstory

...increased crime and alcohol, drug and gambling abuse...



Kitzhaber against tribal casino in Medford

Published 8:24 am, Tuesday, May 7, 2013


MEDFORD, Ore. (AP) — Gov. John Kitzhaber has asked the federal government to reject a proposal by an Oregon tribe to start a casino in Medford.
 
An expansion of casino gambling raises concerns such as increased crime and alcohol, drug and gambling abuse, he said Monday in letters to the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs.
 
He also said the proposal from the Coquille Indian Tribe violates an agreement that limits casinos to one per tribe. There are nine tribal casinos in the state.
 
"I do not believe that expansion of casinos is good for Oregon, and to safeguard against an unprecedented expansion of gambling in this state, it should be of no surprise that I oppose this application," Kitzhaber wrote to Stan Speaks, northwest regional director of the bureau.
 
The Coquille tribe has a casino in North Bend in Coos County.
 
It has bought a Medford bowling alley and a restaurant building and asked the bureau to put the land in a trust, a step toward reservation status, the Medford Mail Tribune (http://bit.ly/108HjuF ) reported.
 
The casino would offer video gambling but not table games. The tribe also has agreed to lease an adjacent golf course.
 
Kitzhaber said concerns raised by both Jackson County and the city of Medford went into his thinking.
 
A tribal spokesman, Ray Doering, said Kitzhaber's opposition was disappointing but not surprising.
The one-per-tribe policy dates to 1997 and was to last for five years, Doering said. "That period has long since ended," he said.
 
He said communities take a few years to warm up to the introduction of gambling.
 
"Never has the first introduction of gaming into a community been embraced," he said.
 
The Cow Creek Band of the Umpqua Tribe of Indians operates a casino in Canyonville, 70 miles north of Medford, and also opposes the Coquilles' proposal as an opening to a "casino arms race."
___
Information from: Mail Tribune, http://www.mailtribune.com/


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Kitzhaber-against-tribal-casino-in-Medford-4495126.php#ixzz2ShK5aWyl

Revenue drops in April at Cleveland casino



Published: May 7, 2013 4:11 PM EST

Revenue drops in April at Cleveland casino

Staff report, Erie Times-News
 
Slot-machine gross revenue dropped significantly at Horseshoe Casino Cleveland in April compared to the prior month, the Ohio Casino Control Commission reported.

The revenue of nearly $12 million was down from the $16 million in March, according to the commission.

The Cleveland casino's slot revenue was nearly identical to the revenue from slot machines at Presque Isle Downs & Casino in April. The Erie casino's slot revenue was $11.8 million.

The Cleveland casino also experienced a slight decline in revenue from table games in April -- $7.9 million, compared to $8.5 million in March. The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board has not yet released the table games report from April for the 11 state casinos.

The Cleveland casino is among the top competitors for business at Presque Isle Downs & Casino. The Cleveland casino opened May 14, 2012.


http://www.goerie.com/article/20130507/NEWS02/305079894/Revenue-drops-in-April-at-Cleveland-casino




 

Worcester Slot Barn Mitigation



Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Slots parlor's impacts requires mitigation, council told


WORCESTER — City Manager Michael V. O'Brien says he will be looking well beyond the limits of the proposed slots parlor site off Kelley Square looking for ways to mitigate its impact to nearby neighborhoods.

In a related matter, Dr. Michael P. Hirsh, the city's acting commissioner of public health, said research he has done into electronic gaming machines, which includes slots, suggests they are far more addictive compared to other forms of gambling.

He said studies have shown that slot machines can lead to addiction at a rate more than three times faster than other gaming.

If a slots parlor is to be built on the 14-acre former Wyman-Gordon property on Madison Street, Mr. O'Brien said the city would need to develop and implement revitalization plans for several neighborhoods in and around that site and focus resources to accelerate their stability and safety.

In addition to Green Island, which is where the slots parlor would be sited, Mr. O'Brien said other neighborhoods that would need to be included in the mitigation discussion are Union Hill, Vernon Hill, the Canal District, Grafton Hill, part of Main South and lower Chandler Street.

The manager said mitigation efforts in those areas would include investments in economic development, housing (home ownership), new infrastructure (streets, sidewalks and parks), additional public safety programs and other additional service.

He said that will likely equate to dedicated mitigation funds for those purposes resulting from the slots parlor siting, and to a dedication of city, state and federal funding over a five- to seven-year period to accomplish the required goals.

He said all the goals would be part of an approved plan overseen by the city.

"These systematic issues are not insurmountable," Mr. O'Brien wrote in a report that goes before the City Council tonight.

"We would need to approach this slots parlor siting, if approved, with single-mindedness as a community to lift this entire section of the city up with economic development and neighborhood revitalization programs, as prioritized first for this area, working side-by-side with area stakeholders," he added.

The manager said it is a "work in progress" in determining what parts of that agenda would be covered through the community host agreement with the developer, and what parts would have to be done by the city on its own.

"The conversation must now include how we as a community would ensure that the neighborhood stabilization and revitalization efforts required — beyond those covered by the host agreement — would be implemented," Mr. O'Brien said.

"This will be a difficult conversation for there are priorities across the city, in neighborhoods throughout, that will likely have to be restructured to meet the immediate infusion to Union Hill/Vernon Hill/Canal District/Green Island/Grafton Hill/Main South and Chandler Street if a slots parlor approved and built," he wrote.

Mass Gaming and Entertainment LLC has proposed a 120,000-square-foot building on the Wyman-Gordon property that would have up to 1,250 slot machines.

The building would also house two restaurants, a food court, a bar and possibly a day spa. Meanwhile, a full-service hotel would be built in conjunction with the slots parlor development at a yet-to-be announced downtown location.

The total investment for the slots parlor and hotel is pegged at $240 million, along with the creation of more than 600 jobs. The project is also expected to generate millions of dollars in property tax revenues for the city.

While the developer presented some general details about the proposal to the City Council Economic Development and Public Safety committees two weeks ago, Mr. O'Brien said he is still waiting to receive more specific details about the slots parlor and hotel proposals.

He said he cannot begin negotiations on a community host agreement until city officials receive the details they need.

Meanwhile, Dr. Hirsh said electronic gaming machines, such as slots, are designed to stimulate the gamer in such a way to promote and prolong play.

He said the addictiveness of slots is because of their ability to rapidly deliver doses of play; up to 1,200 plays per hour.

"Studies show that (electronic gaming machines) can lead to addiction after one year, while other types of gambling take an average of 3 1/2 years to develop and addiction," Dr. Hirsh wrote in a report that also goes before the City Council tonight.

"Incorporation of the 'near-miss' into the electronic gaming machines essentially 'tricks' the player to feel satisfaction as long as they continue to play, regardless of wins or losses," he added. "All of these points evidence to addictiveness of EGMs, including slot machines."
http://www.telegram.com/article/20130507/NEWS/305078783/1116

The Massachusetts Muddle




Mashpee Wampanoag tribe preparing to release new details about proposed casino design

By Gerry Tuoti
 
Although the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe no longer has exclusivity in the southeastern Massachusetts casino market, it is continuing to pursue a casino in Taunton and is preparing to release new details next week about the proposed facility’s design.

“In light of whatever the Mass. Gaming Commission has done, I don’t think it’s a setback,” Tribal Chairman Cedric Cromwell said when reached by phone Tuesday. “I don’t think it in any way, shape or form affects our progress.”

Cromwell plans to attend next week’s City Council meeting to reveal new architectural details and other information about the proposed tribal casino. A letter from Cromwell was included in Tuesday’s Taunton City Council packet. In the letter, he references “great progress” the tribe has made.

The tribe, which had been given exclusivity in southeastern Massachusetts, or Region C, lost that advantage last month when the Massachusetts Gaming Commission voted unanimously to solicit applications for a commercial casino in the region. Members of the gaming commission expressed concerns over the uncertainty surrounding the Mashpee’s pursuit of the federal land designation they need to open a tribal casino.

“The legislation, as I take it, manifested an intent … a general suggestion, it seems to me, that Region C not be left behind,” Gaming Commission member James McHugh said before voting last month to allow commercial applicants in the region.

The tribe is also awaiting legislative action on the gambling compact it reached in March with Gov. Deval Patrick. Lawmakers have not yet voted on the agreement.

Cromwell said he is undeterred by the Gaming Commission vote and expects the legislature to approve the compact.

“There are exciting things we want to talk with the Taunton City Council about,” Cromwell said. “There are designs and architectural developments we’ve advanced on, and it’s and very important that we review those plans with City Council members and get their input on things. It’s important we go over the architectural design and needs of the destination resort casino to make sure it meets needs of the IGA, the city of Taunton and the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe.”


Read more: http://www.tauntongazette.com/news/x2062763829/Mashpee-Wampanoag-tribe-preparing-to-release-new-details-about-proposed-casino-design#ixzz2Sh7iTsSr
 

United States: The Massachusetts Muddle: What Does It Mean For The Mashpee Wampanoag?

07 May 2013
 

The Mashpee Wampanoag casino project planned for the town of Taunton in southeastern Massachusetts received a major setback when the state Gaming Commission voted last week to suspend the legislated tribal priority for a license in that portion of the state. The priority was part of a statewide casino plan enacted by the state legislature two years ago authorizing three casinos in the state with a preference giving an Indian tribe the rights to the license designated for the southeastern part of the state. That preference clearly was intended to benefit the Mashpee Wampanoag, which was federally recognized in the spring of 2007 through a Department of the Interior administrative process. Non-tribal casinos were authorized for two other areas of the state, and those licenses are the subject of competition among casino development teams.

The Gaming Commission action was a predictable consequence of the legislative priority itself, in that the law established timelines for the Tribe that many believed would be virtually impossible to meet. Indeed, the Tribe's deadline to get the gaming into trust status in a timely manner has been extended to give Interior additional time in which to accept the proposed casino site into trust status for gaming.

The Mashpee propose to operate a $500 million destination resort casino in Taunton, although it must be noted that the Taunton site is the third identified during six years of the tribal efforts to develop a casino. The other sites were within the Town of Middleborough and New Bedford. In addition to changing proposed gaming sites, the Tribe also replaced its original development team after it had executed a comprehensive local services agreement with Middleborough in July 2007. The peripatetic search for a gaming site has consumed money and a considerable amount of time, causing delay that was cited by the Commission in its unanimous vote to allow commercial casino developers to apply for the license. Such applications will constitute competition for a license that Mashpee has viewed as its legislated entitlement.

At last week's hearing, Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby declared that the law provided for opening up the competition to non-Indian entities if it appears that Mashpee will be unlikely to obtain the federal trust status necessary for tribal gaming. While Interior officials have declared that they are "expediting" consideration of the trust application and expect a final decision sometime during 2013, the continuing delays led to the Commission's invocation of the law's requirement that it "must" seek commercial bids for the license if it decides that the Tribe will not get land into trust for an Indian casino.

Mashpee Chairman Cedric Cromwell urged the Commission to not approve commercial casino applications, noting that the Tribe is proposing to pay "hundreds of millions of dollars" to the state in return for the exclusive right to conduct casino gaming in the designated region. He asserted that the Tribe will continue to develop and operate its project even if the third license goes elsewhere, meaning that the Tribe will develop a fourth casino in the state pursuant to the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. Part of that assertion included the statement that a federal Indian casino would make no payments into the state's treasury. Commission Chairman Crosby responded that if the Tribe does not obtain status for the land and the third license is not issued, then the state would lose the $85 million license fee and annual tax revenue of approximately $100 million.

The controversy is far from over, and the outcome is far from certain.

Meanwhile, the Massachusetts House of Representatives took action last week that could result in the legalization of online poker in the state, an activity that potentially could have adverse impacts on the "brick and mortar" casino gaming revenues anticipated from the "three casino" plan already on the books. This bill was attached to the FY 2014 budget and would authorize online poker to be offered by up to three separate operators. A much broader bill was introduced in the state Senate in February that proposes to go beyond online poker by authorizing online casino games.

The Massachusetts Muddle seems to have a life of its own. Whether and how the Mashpee Wampanoag casino project will be affected by these latest developments is unknown, but events are moving quickly on Beacon Hill. It is safe to say that the overall picture is constantly changing and is likely to continue doing so.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/237646/Gaming/The+Massachusetts+Muddle+What+Does+It+Mean+For+The

 

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

TEN THINGS EVERY BUSINESSMAN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CASINOS

TEN THINGS EVERY BUSINESSMAN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CASINOS: CASINOS CREATE CRIME -In Sacramento, DUI's on the approach roads to the Thunder Valley casino were up 600% in the first year of operation (CHP). According to CityRating.com, crime statistics in Lincoln, CA, home of Thunder Valley casino show an overall upward trend in crime based on data from 11 years, with violent crime increasing and property crime increasing. The crime rate in Lincoln for 2013 is expected to be higher than in 2010. In Atlantic City, crime increased 258% after the casinos opened. (National Institute of Justice).
TEN THINGS EVERY BUSINESSMAN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CASINOS:  CASINOS CREATE CRIME -In Sacramento, DUI's on the approach roads to the Thunder Valley casino were up 600% in the first year of operation (CHP).  According to CityRating.com, crime statistics in Lincoln, CA, home of Thunder Valley casino show an overall upward trend in crime based on data from 11 years, with violent crime increasing and property crime increasing. The crime rate in Lincoln for 2013 is expected to be higher than in 2010.  In Atlantic City, crime increased 258% after the casinos opened. (National Institute of Justice).

Monday, May 6, 2013

Tax relief falls short


If you ask Rep. Tina Davis or any of our other lawmakers how much money they and their loved ones lost in our casinos their answer would be none. That’s because they like other lawmakers in casino states know it’s a ‘SCAM.’

Bucks County Courier Times - May 6, 2013 -
If you ask Rep. Tina Davis or any of our other lawmakers how much money they and their loved ones lost in our casinos their answer would be none. That’s because they like other lawmakers in casino states know it’s a ‘SCAM.’

Bucks County Courier Times - May 6, 2013 - Tax relief falls short

No doubt there were those — either because they are philosophically opposed to gambling or simply don’t put much stock in government promises — who dismissed former Gov. Ed Rendell’s prediction that revenue from slot machines would produce a billion dollars a year in school property tax reductions.
...
Relief from the much-reviled tax was a major selling point in Rendell’s ultimately successful pitch to bring slots to the commonwealth.

Read more: http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/courier_times_news/opinion/editorials/tax-relief-falls-short/article_b215abc9-e8fb-50dc-b43d-b4ad33f20240.html
See More
If you ask Rep. Tina Davis or any of our other lawmakers how much money they and their loved ones lost in our casinos their answer would be none. That’s because they like other lawmakers in casino states know it’s a ‘SCAM.’

Bucks County Courier Times - May 6, 2013 - Tax relief falls short 
  
No doubt there were those — either because they are philosophically opposed to gambling or simply don’t put much stock in government promises — who dismissed former Gov. Ed Rendell’s prediction that revenue from slot machines would produce a billion dollars a year in school property tax reductions.

Relief from the much-reviled tax was a major selling point in Rendell’s ultimately successful pitch to bring slots to the commonwealth.

Read more: http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/courier_times_news/opinion/editorials/tax-relief-falls-short/article_b215abc9-e8fb-50dc-b43d-b4ad33f20240.html

When Neighbors Have More Sense Than Massachusetts Does





Granite State Coalition
Against Expanded Gambling

NoSlots.com Blog & Alerts
 

In just 2-3 weeks, the New Hampshire House will vote on SB152, an irreparably flawed bill that would:
  • Cannibalize good jobs and revenues from thousands of local businesses and nonprofits,
  • Spread slots parlors and gambling addiction statewide,
  • Fail to provide even a nickel for the coming budget,
  • Enrich the Las Vegas gambling company whose lobbyists wrote the bill.
While we are slightly ahead in our vote count, a variety of interest groups given a "piece of the action" in the bill are putting ferocious pressure on undecided House members.
To defeat this Frankenstein of a casino bill, we are depending completely on each of you receiving this email to call your Representative. One call asking your undecided Representative to vote NO on SB152.
Said more bluntly: if you don't call your Rep, we lose.
Even if you've called earlier this year,
hit reply, give me your residence town,
and I will send you brief talking points and the phone number for one undecided House member who represents you.
Then ... make the call this evening.
Magnify your effectiveness:
  • Post our anti-casino petition link on your Facebook page.
  • CC your anti-casino friends and associates when you hit reply to this email.
Thank you,
Jim Rubens
Chair, GSCAEG






30 Reasons To Oppose Slot Casinos


Granite State Coalition Against Expanded Gambling | PO Box 3931 | Concord | NH | 03302
 
 



Some casinos short of job projections

When Massachusetts convinces itself of the accuracy of the overstated projections, it denies  reality --

Iowa’s 18 state-regulated casinos employed 9,236 workers

Casinos pay out mixed results in jobs, development

Experts question venues' role in spurring communities' growth


May 5, 2013
Written by
Emily Schettler and Daniel P. Finney

Supporters of proposed casinos frequently cite job creation and attraction of new businesses as reasons to support new gambling venues.

Yet a Des Moines Register review of Iowa’s casinos shows many of them have been slow to stimulate the opening of new businesses nearby and in some cases have created fewer jobs than projected.

That’s not to say casinos are drags on the economy. Iowa’s 18 state-licensed casinos in 2012 generated more than $405 million in tax dollars and admission fees for the federal government, the state and local communities, according to the Iowa Gaming Association. The venues also provided $86.8 million in charitable contributions and donations.

Some of Iowa’s casinos have seen flat or declining revenues in recent years. From 2009 to 2011, the industry as a whole saw its economic impact in the state decrease before growing again in 2012 to more than $1 billion, according to an Iowa Gaming Association study.

“It’s a tougher go for casinos today than it was 10 years ago, and it was a tougher go 10 years ago than it was 20 years ago,” said Ernie Goss, a professor of economics at Creighton University in Omaha who studies gambling and casinos.

Proposals for casinos in Linn and Warren counties have renewed questions about whether the state can support more gambling.

Jeff Lamberti, chairman of the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission, which authorizes new gambling licenses, has said the impact on other casinos within a region will be key to whether new applications are approved.

In March, voters in Linn County approved a measure to allow gambling with 61 percent support. The vote was prompted by a group of investors who want to build a casino in downtown Cedar Rapids.

Now, state regulators will issue a market study to determine what impact another casino could have on others in the region.

 Warren County voters will decide Tuesday whether to allow gambling in that county. A group of local civic and business leaders has proposed building a $145 million casino, hotel, events center and bowling alley in northwest Norwalk near Iowa Highways 5 and 28. Wild Rose Entertainment would operate the casino.

Some casinos short of job projections

Casino backers in Linn and Warren counties point to an expected influx of jobs.

Iowa’s 18 state-regulated casinos employed 9,236 workers and provided more than $285.7 million in salaries and benefits in 2012, according to information from the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission and the Iowa Gaming Association.

Backers of the Warren County proposal say the venue would provide 600 permanent jobs and 250 construction jobs.

Those behind the Linn County proposal say it would create 362 permanent jobs with an average compensation package of $42,000 per year. In addition, 137 construction jobs would be created, plus 134 new jobs at existing local businesses.

Wild Rose spokeswoman Jamie Buelt said the job-creation projection for the Warren County casino is a conservative estimate based on the company’s experience and a 2009 market study conducted by the state.

Wild Rose operates two other Iowa casinos. Its Clinton casino and resort, which opened in 1991, has 279 workers, according to Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission data. The other is a newer casino, which opened in 2006 in Emmetsburg.

When Wild Rose applied for the Emmetsburg license, it projected 250 jobs. It’s done slightly better than that. Today, the casino has 265 workers, 234 of whom are full time.

Another casino that opened in 2006, the Diamond Jo Worth Casino in Northwood, also has exceeded its job projections.

But three other casinos that opened in 2006 or later — Grand Falls Casino Resort in Larchwood, the Isle Casino Hotel in Waterloo, and Riverside Casino and Golf Resort in Riverside — don’t employ the number of people originally projected in applications for licenses.

That’s not surprising, given the subsequent downturn in the economy, said Michael Hicks, a Ball State University economist who studies casinos and gambling.

“Optimism among investors and entrepreneurs is a common trait,” Hicks said. “It takes a long time to build a casino, and the rest of the competitive environment is not at a standstill.”

The Grand Falls Casino, for instance, projected 739 jobs when it applied for a license in 2010; today it has 520.

Joe Massa, Riverside’s chief operating officer, said changes in technology and other efficiencies over time have led to the lower number.

“That’s pretty understandable,” he said. “You have a learning curve for your employees, and as you’re in business longer, the efficiency of your operation improves. You end up needing less people to do the job.”

The casino is the largest employer in Riverside, a city of about 1,000 people about 15 miles south of Iowa City. It’s the second-largest employer in Washington County, Massa said.

Tom Timmons, Wild Rose’s vice president of operations, said casino employees contribute significantly to the local economy, particularly in small towns like Emmetsburg.

“We’re the largest employer by leaps and bounds,” he said. “All those employees obviously buy meals there, gas there. They stop at convenience stores, restaurants and grocery stores.”

However, critics say, casino employees have less spending ability than employees in other industries.

A 2007 survey of the American Gaming Association showed that 56 percent of the casino employees surveyed in eight states, including Iowa, had an annual household income of $50,000 or less.

Do casinos attract other businesses?

In Norwalk, where residential property accounts for 80 percent of the tax base, gambling proponents argue a casino could help even out the burden between homes and businesses and spur further commercial development.

“What Norwalk is looking for is an anchor that would start the process of filling in that commercial development,” Timmons said. “Everything starts to spring out from that.”

However, Hicks and others who study gambling said that although casinos might attract some new businesses, such as restaurants and retail stores, they also can lead to the closure of existing businesses.

“I don’t think there’s any evidence that there’s big net growth in new businesses around those areas,” he said. “In net terms, casinos are not the panacea that their biggest boosters claim them to be.”

Whether a casino can draw other businesses and help those around it depends entirely on the size and scope of the gambling establishment and its ability to attract visitors from outside the area, Goss said.

“If it’s a good development, it could stimulate overall business.”

He pointed to three casinos in Council Bluffs and Prairie Meadows in Altoona as examples of those that have been successful.

Melissa Horton, executive director of the Altoona Area Chamber of Commerce, said the city saw a “surge of development” after the casino opened in 1995, including new Walmart, Target and Menards stores.

However, she said, it’s less likely the casino plays a role in attracting businesses in other industries, such as the $1 billion Facebook data center announced last month.

Mike Whalen, CEO of the Heart of America Group, a Moline, Ill.-development company, is working to develop his own property in Altoona. He said the casino’s presence would not influence a “go or no-go decision.”

“We have a whole laundry list of factors that cause us to make a decision. It’s not catalytic, but it’s certainly a nice ‘and,’ ” he said.

Davenport city officials say they have not seen any growth as a result of the Isle of Capri opening the Rhythm City riverboat casino in 1991.

“In all those years, there has been zero land-based development,” said Craig Malin, Davenport city administrator.

The Isle of Capri once owned the Black Hawk Hotel, a famous Iowa landmark built in 1931 known as the place where actor Cary Grant died. The hotel went out of business under the casino’s management.

Now the city wants to buy the casino and build its own site on land. Officials believe a land-based casino would be more advantageous to the community than a riverboat.

In Riverside, Massa said the casino’s 2006 opening spurred the development of a new gas station, University of Iowa health clinic and condominiums.

That city’s commercial valuation shot up from about $4.7 million in 2004 to $71 million in 2011, according to the Iowa Department of Management. The casino accounts for $62 million of the new valuation, according to the Washington County assessor.

In December 2010, Kelly Wood of Washington, Ia., moved her Scandinavian Interiors furniture store from Coralville to Riverside between U.S. Highway 218 and the casino.

“Obviously the casino is going to pull a lot of people off the interstate, and if the casino is successful, hopefully we can draw on that,” Wood said.

She said other development in the area is not what she’d hoped.

“My business is on Commercial Lane, and we’ve hoped for some commercial activity, but so far me and the hospital are the only ones taking the plunge.”

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20130505/NEWS/305050081/1094/SPORTS0206/?odyssey=nav%7Chead


Patch Poll: With 21 Casinos in Iowa, Should We Add Another?
Investment groups are pitching casino projects all over Iowa. Warren County voters will consider a Norwalk casino on Tuesday. Linn County voters already said "yes" to a casino.

Gamblers have 21 casinos to choose from across the state of Iowa, and seemingly every few weeks some investment group is making a play to grow that number.

Talk of a new casino in Ankeny and Urbandale came and went. Over in eastern Iowa, Linn County voters approved building a casino in Cedar Rapids. Now a West Des Moines casino group, Wild Rose Entertainment, is putting money towards a campaign for a casino in Norwalk. Warren County residents vote on Tuesday.

Even if Warren County voters approve the casino the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission will still have to decide whether to grant a license. It's the same case in Linn County.

There's 18 active casino gaming licenses through the Iowa gaming commission, and there's three additional Indian casinos.

The question is, should Iowa build another casino?

http://waukee.patch.com/articles/patch-poll-with-21-casinos-in-iowa-should-we-add-another

 

'Regulation' won't curb casinos' harm


Valley View: 'Regulation' won't curb casinos' harm

May 4, 2013
Written by
Stephen Q. Shafer

When Gov. Andrew Cuomo in 2012 proposed new commercial casinos, he said they would need regulation. Likely reasons: Mitigate problem gambling and protect against cheating and organized crime.

Casino owners want regulation about as much as do big banks: The least possible. Regulation hurts profits by constraining practices (e.g. payday loans) and limiting externalities, costs of doing business that are passed to society at large. A company no longer free to discharge waste into a river faces new costs; paying them may lose it business if competitors avoid similar restrictions and don’t raise their prices. Casinos, in business only for profit, hate to absorb fiscal burdens they have always externalized, like the socioeconomic costs of problem gambling.

The central statistic of casinos: It is estimated that 50 percent of the gross revenues after winnings are paid out (about half the profit) comes from compulsive and problem gamblers — about 4 percent of the adult population — who comprise less than 10 percent of casino customers. From this statistic follows the ethical dilemma: If casinos steered all the pathological and problem gamblers in their sphere into lasting recovery and prevented the creation of any new ones, profits would drop by 50 percent. How would that play on the bottom line? Not well at all. What to do?

Solution: Express concern about problem gambling with a facade of “prevention” methods structured to fail. Accede gracefully to toothless “regulation.”

Legislators weighing “second passage” of a bill meant to legalize new casinos in New York by amending the constitution through public referendum must ask three questions.

“Would those casinos work really hard to profit 50 percent less than many others do?” That’s obvious: No.

“Do I really believe New York state can and will properly regulate casinos if they don’t want it and the state shares in their profits?” Another no.

“Is it fair to New York state residents to commend to them, by a ‘yes’ on second passage, a sham I don’t believe in.” No.

Readers, tell your Assembly member and your state Senator to vote “no” on second passage.

Stephen Q. Shafer is chairperson of the Coalition Against Gambling in New York, http://cagnyinf.org. He lives in Saugerties.

http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20130505/OPINION04/305050092/Valley-View-Regulation-won-t-curb-casinos-harm

Abbott would legislate to cut gambling ads




Abbott would legislate to cut gambling ads
 
OPPOSITION Leader Tony Abbott has put the television industry "on notice" to clamp down on broadcasting live betting odds during sports coverage or face a legislated ban.

Mr Abbott has said if he wins the September election he will legislate a ban, unless the industry takes action first.

"We always prefer self-regulation over government regulations but there are some social problems that from time to time demand government attention," he told reporters near Geelong in Victoria on Sunday.

"I welcome the fact that the industry is moving to ensure that we don't have gambling promotion posing as commentary at sporting events."

Mr Abbott said he was "putting the television industry on notice".

"They've not just got to talk the talk, they have to walk the walk," he said.

But Australian Greens senator Richard Di Natale said Mr Abbott's plan was an exact replica of the government's policy, which hadn't worked.
"His announcement today is that we will hand it over to the industry to fix (and) if the industry don't fix it, then the government will, but that's exactly the government's position," Senator Di Natale said.

"That's resulted in a meaningless code of conduct and it's resulted in a quadrupling in the number of gambling ads that young kids are exposed to.

"The government has tried Tony Abbott's policy and it's failed."

Anti-gambling campaigner and independent Senator Nick Xenophon said he was encouraged by Mr Abbott's intention to shield children from gambling, which "reflected overwhelming community sentiment".

"There's a real concern about gambling culture pervading our sports," he told Sky News on Sunday.
He said micro-bets or ball-by-ball bets were open to corruption and match fixing.

Senator Xenophon urged the coalition to support his private members bill to ban gambling advertising during all G-rated programs and overturn the exemption for sports programs.

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said the federal government had been working with the commercial television sector to develop a new code.

"I suggest Mr Abbott reads it," he told reporters in Sydney.
"What you will find is that there's an agreement in place that's under consultation."

He said restrictions on live sports betting odds were being put into place and the Australian Communications and Media Authority would pursue stations that breached the code.

"People are having live betting pushed down their throats," Senator Conroy said.

Meanwhile, Senator Xenophon reiterated his call for an independent inquiry into the spat between race horse owner John Singleton, trainer Gai Waterhouse and her bookmaker son Tom.

"A number of potential key witnesses may be refusing to appear before the stewards inquiry, which strengthens my argument that there ought to be a judicial inquiry independent of the racing industry to get to the bottom of this," he said.

Monday's stewards inquiry follows the poor performance of the Singleton-owned and Waterhouse-trained More Joyous after she finished second last in last weekend's All Aged Stakes at Randwick.
Singleton announced after the race that he had sacked Waterhouse as his trainer because her son had told people More Joyous had a problem and could not win.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/breaking-news/mixed-reaction-to-abbott-betting-odds-ban/story-e6freono-1226635428624

Slow slots



Sunday, May 5, 2013

Slow slots

Deliberation and patience key to process
 
The design, placement and operation of slot machines is predicated on speed, getting players into the venue, entertaining them, and keeping them there to spend their money. But the design and execution of a proper host community agreement — one that fully protects Worcester from the problems that a slots parlor could bring or exacerbate — is a very deliberative process, one that is likely to take months of back-and-forth information sharing and negotiations between the developer and the city manager.

That is as it should be. The decision whether to site a slots parlor must not be hurried or short-circuited by impatience on the part of advocates or opponents, it must not be dictated by timelines facing the developer, and it must unfold without regard to the political calendar.

While a public referendum will be held, and approval is needed for the proposal to advance, that referendum can only be held between 60 and 90 days from the completion of a host agreement.

Based upon the very detailed and demanding list of elements that must go into such an agreement, residents and those on both sides of the slots debate should anticipate many weeks of talks and negotiations.

In an April 30 memo to the City Council, City Manager Michael V. O’Brien lists three pages of points to be addressed, including detailed layout of the slots parlor, security arrangements, employment practices, impact on Worcester and surrounding communities, and mitigation measures to address problem gambling.

The site development plans must address still more specific issues, including sustainable development principles for energy use, use of local businesses for supplies, and development of a diverse workforce training program.

The manager’s memo also includes a requirement that the proponent detail any contracts it may have with organized labor. That point alone could be contentious, as Rush Street Gaming has already inked a Memorandum of Understanding with local labor unions that calls for construction work to use 100 percent union labor. Such a deal would fly in the face of the city’s general practices.

As Mr. O’Brien notes in his memo to councilors, “Time is of the essence.” But timeliness is not always about getting something done quickly. In this case, it should be read as getting to an agreement that works for all. Only then can voters be sure their referendum votes will be informed ones, and their verdict the best possible outcome for Worcester.
 
 
 

Product Liability Litigation



U.S. lawyers plot gambling addiction suits as casinos go online

5/2/2013
By Sue Zeidler

LOS ANGELES, (Reuters) - States and casinos racing to legalize online gaming may find some unwelcome visitors on their websites: product liability lawyers.

A group of 10 lawyers and academics with experience in prior liability cases met in Indianapolis in mid-April to discuss whether a lawsuit claiming online gaming further promotes gambling addiction has a shot at winning.

The legal strategy under consideration would be modeled on the class action lawsuits that forced cigarette companies to agree to pay $206 billion over 25 years to compensate for medical costs, caring for people with smoking-related illnesses, and to fund anti-smoking advocacy groups.

Boston-based lawyer Scott Harshbarger told Reuters that more than 20 attorneys from high-profile law firms were among those invited to the meeting in Indianapolis and who have been communicating for the past few months. The meeting was billed as a "gambling litigation study group," according to emails reviewed by Reuters.

Harshbarger, a former Massachusetts attorney general who led states' efforts against Big Tobacco, said he could not attend the Indianapolis meeting but is working with the group in studying the parallels with the gambling industry.

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Fagan, who prosecuted 30 cases against offshore sports betting operations from 1997 to 2008, helped put together the Indianapolis meeting, according to one email. He declined comment.

The National Council on Problem Gambling estimates that gambling addictions account for $7 billion a year in added health care and criminal justice system costs. Gambling industry critics argue that casino companies use deceptive practices to lure consumers, depend on addiction for profits and should be held liable for the billions of dollars in costs to society.

Gambling company representatives reject the charges, saying their industry has a history of acting responsibly and helps to identify customers who may need treatment.

"It's a government-approved, regulated product," said David Stewart, a Washington-based lawyer with Ropes & Gray and general counsel to the American Gaming Association (AGA). "Nobody's made Nordstrom reimburse somebody who is a shopaholic."

Previous lawsuits targeting traditional gambling have been thrown out by the courts, Stewart said.
"The legal arguments are flawed," he said. "It's gambling. And when you gamble, you lose."

ONLINE EXPANSION

Nevada became the first state to go live with online poker this week as Ultimate Gaming, a subsidiary of Station Casinos LLC, launched its Internet poker site Ultimate Poker in the state and began taking bets.

Ultimate Gaming CEO Tobin Prior said his company offers safeguards against problem gambling.

"We offer an extensive array of limits that players can place on themselves as well as the option to opt out of betting entirely," he said.

But critics think betting and time limits should be mandated rather than options, and also have found fault with the enforcement of so-called "opt out" or self-exclusion programs.

New Jersey is expected to release regulations for online gaming in coming weeks. Massachusetts, California, Hawaii, Illinois and Mississippi are among states also considering online gambling.
MGM Resorts, Caesars and Wynn Resorts have all applied for Web operating licenses. All three companies deferred their comments to the American Gaming Association.

CRAPS AND CIGARETTES?

It was not clear how the Indianapolis group might deal with past precedents working against them, including a 2004 federal appellate ruling that millions of gamblers could not be declared a single class because each gambles for different reasons.

That ruling derailed a decade-old legal effort to prove slot machines were inherently deceptive devices.

The recent gathering, though, examined possible similarities between gambling addiction and addiction to cigarettes.

"Big product liability litigators are comparing Big Tobacco cases in depth with gambling cases involving casinos and addiction," said University of Illinois professor and author John Kindt, who attended the meeting in Indianapolis.

Critics claim that in addition to depending on addiction for profits, gaming companies pulled a page from Big Tobacco by running ads that glamorize their offerings and target youth.

Attorney Lori Stoltz of Canadian law firm Adair Morse LLP represents 10,000 problem gamblers in a suit against Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp, who claim they were exploited and suffered losses because government-owned OLGC did not prevent them from gambling despite their signing self-exclusion forms.

Stoltz was not at the meeting, but believes similar lawsuits are likely. "Self-exclusion and where there isn't appropriate follow through is one area that has come under challenge," Stoltz said, adding,

"There's bound to be more litigation in this area."

Gambling proponents say it is impossible to measure the social costs of gambling addiction.

"We don't dispute but don't confirm the $7 billion (in estimated costs) because pathological gambling often occurs in individuals with other addiction issues and to specifically attribute the costs to one disorder is a leap," said American Gaming Association spokeswoman Holly Wetzel.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook 

http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2013/05_-_May/U_S__lawyers_plot_gambling_addiction_suits_as_casinos_go_online/

 

Sunday, May 5, 2013




In a 14-page letter, Hopkinton through attorney J. Raymond Miyares criticized 61 aspects of the proposed regulations. In particular, the town said the regulations rely on the casino applicants to decide which communities will be designated under the law as "surrounding communities," which gives the town greater status in the review and access to funds to evaluate the development impacts. 



Gaming Commission Hears from Area Towns, Casino Applicants
Towns bordering Milford were among those who submitted comments by Friday to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission on its proposed process for reviewing resort casino applications.

By Mary MacDonald

May 3, 2013
%%%%%%%%%%%%
Hopkinton and Medway have expressed strong concern that the state is not adequately protecting communities near proposed resort casino sites. The comments, made to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, as part of a public hearing on its proposed process for evaluating resort casino applications, were released Friday.

In addition, state Sen. Karen Spilka, state Rep. Carolyn Dykema and Rep. Jeffrey Roy — whose districts include Holliston, Hopkinton, Ashland, Franklin and Medway — have sent a letter that expresses concern about the communities' access to expertise to evaulate the proposal for Milford, and a commission timeline that could compress the review.

Foxwoods Massachusetts, which is seeking a license for a resort casino near I-495 in Milford, did not submit comments at the public hearing on the proposed Phase 2 regulations, held at three locations in Massachusetts. The regulations include descriptions of the process for applicants to submit their final proposals, and the process for addressing development impacts on host towns and surrounding communities.

Both of the competitors for the resort casino license in the greater Boston region — Wynn Resorts and Suffolk Downs/Ceasars Entertainment — submitted feedback in writing.

In a 14-page letter, Hopkinton through attorney J. Raymond Miyares criticized 61 aspects of the proposed regulations. In particular, the town said the regulations rely on the casino applicants to decide which communities will be designated under the law as "surrounding communities," which gives the town greater status in the review and access to funds to evaulate the development impacts.
"Section 125.01(a) continues to provide that a city or town will qualify as a surrounding community if it is so identifed in [a Phase 2] application," Miyares said. "Hopkinton previously commented that this section should be eliminated because it creates a perverse incentive: to limit the number of cities and towns that are discussed in the ... application. The town is dismayed that the commission kept this incentive in place."

Hopkinton wants all cities and towns within 5 miles of a proposed casino to be automatically designated as surrounding communities.

Medway, through its Board of Selectmen chairman, said the town had reached out to the developer of the Milford casino and received no acknowledgment.

"... Leading us to conclude, as time continues to pass, that the applicant designation avenue is more likely than not being foreclosed upon for us and other prospective surrounding communities in the region," wrote Andrew Espinosa, chairman of the Medway Selectmen.

The regulations do not adequately address the surrounding communities' ability to finance the research and studies that would be required to evaulate the anticipated impact of the casino, Espinosa wrote. And if no money is made available by the developer ahead of its filing the Phase 2 application, the towns' only option would be to finance its own studies.

"The proposed language that would give the Commission latitude to exceed the $50,000 for potential disbursements in Community Disbursements, ... is not helpful to towns that have made no progress in communication with the developer," Espinosa wrote. "And such funds that may be available to prospective surrounding communities 30 days following the execution of a host agreement is still too late for Medway to prepare an acceptable response to the commission concerning impacts."

The so-called Phase 2 applications can be made by developers once they pass an initial state review that looks at their financial backgrounds and business histories, and once they have negotiated a host agreement with the site town. Completed applications have to address 57 elements, and show proof that the community has supported the project in a referendum vote.

The state's background investigations into developers and their financial backers began in late January, and is considered the Phase 1 process.

Under Phase 2 applications, developers need to demonstrate they "have thought broadly and creatively about creating an innovative and unique gaming establishment" that provides a "significant and lasting benefit to the residents of the host community, the surrounding communities, the region and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts."

Fifty-seven elements have to be addressed by developers, including:
  • a copy of the host community agreement, which includes provisions for a community impact fee.
  • information demonstrating how the developer will address impact and mitigation concerns.
  • a listing of the infrastructure costs of the host town resulting from the construction and operation of a casino, and a statement to commit to a "community mitigation plan."
  • proof of a positive vote in the host town in a referendum on the casino.
  • a list of the communities, or community, the developer believes to be a "surrouding community."
  • information explaining how the applicant will address surrounding community impacts.
  • a description and documentation of public outreach efforts made to local communities.
  • clear and convincing evidence of financial stability, including tax returns and other reports filed by government agencies and personal accounting check records and ledgers.
Related Topics:Crossroads Massachusetts, Foxwoods Massachusetts, Milford Casino, and massachusetts gaming commission

http://milford-ma.patch.com/articles/gaming-commission-hears-from-area-towns-casino-applicants-on-proposed-regulations

 

Wynn says Casino gambling is 'not healthy'



I agree with Wynn 100%. Casino gambling is 'not healthy'.

Atlantic City Press - May 4, 2013 - Vegas Wire: Wynn says gambling industry 'not healthy'

Gambling magnate Steve Wynn met behind closed doors with the governor and legislative leaders Wednesday, proclaiming in a brief interview that the gambling industry is not in a “healthy” condition and future growth will be in places other than Nevada.
...
“Right now, the gaming industry has a serious health problem,” Wynn said in a brief hallway interview.

Read more: http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/business/vegas-wire-wynn-says-gambling-industry-not-healthy/article_b4d7999c-b526-11e2-a0e1-0019bb2963f4.html
See More
I agree with Wynn 100%. Casino gambling is 'not healthy'.

Atlantic City Press - May 4, 2013 - Vegas Wire: Wynn says gambling industry 'not healthy'

Gambling magnate Steve Wynn met behind closed doors with the governor and legislative leaders Wednesday, proclaiming in a brief interview that the gambling industry is not in a “healthy” condition and future growth will be in places other than Nevada.

“Right now, the gaming industry has a serious health problem,” Wynn said in a brief hallway interview.

Read more: http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/business/vegas-wire-wynn-says-gambling-industry-not-healthy/article_b4d7999c-b526-11e2-a0e1-0019bb2963f4.html