Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Thursday, February 14, 2013

Gambling Addict to Prison



Brooksville woman receives five-year sentence for gambling away in-laws' savings

Wednesday, February 13, 2013
 
  • BROOKSVILLE — Jennifer Dennison took the stand and described how her love affair with gambling began.

    At first, Dennison and her husband, Scott, were content playing nickel slot machines at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Tampa. Then Jennifer suggested they try the high-limit room. They put $500 in a machine and won $10,000.

    "We never left the high-limit room after that," Jennifer said. "It was better than my first kiss or falling in love. It controlled my life."

    Over the next two years, Jennifer would gamble away about $500,000 of the nest egg Scott's parents, Laverne and Janet, had built. On Wednesday, Circuit Judge Daniel B. Merritt Sr. sentenced her to five years in prison.

    "I recognize the testimony that compulsive gambling is an illness," Merritt said. "But even though it is compulsive, there is still some area of conscious decisionmaking there, and when you make bad decisions, you have to pay the consequences."

    Dennison, 44, of Brooksville, pleaded no contest last summer to one count of grand theft of $50,000 or more from a person older than 65. The first-degree felony carries a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison, but prosecutors agreed to a cap of 10 years.

    During three hours of emotional testimony, a parade of Laverne and Janet Dennison's family members asked Merritt to levy the maximum sentence to punish Dennison for stealing the money the couple had saved to ensure that Janet, who suffers from severe dementia, could be cared for at home.
    Laverne, a World War II veteran, died of cancer in August 2011, about four months after his daughter-in-law was arrested. Janet, a former postal carrier, is 75 and doesn't recognize her children.

    "She's now in a nursing home," daughter Vera Cannon said. "This crime has put her there, and she doesn't get released until she dies."

    Bruce Denson, Dennison's attorney, called expert witnesses to try to persuade Merritt to give Dennison probation.

    Tiffany Lawrence, a clinical social worker, testified that Dennison suffers from depression and post traumatic stress disorder triggered by years of physical and sexual abuse by her stepfather. Hearing Lawrence recount graphic acts prompted Dennison and her family members in the gallery to start sobbing.

    Both Lawrence and Damon Dye, Dennison's licensed therapist, said Dennison is a remorseful gambling addict. They noted that Dennison, after being released on bail, spent a month in an in-patient program and is continuing her recovery.

    To send her to prison, they said, would keep her from getting a job and paying restitution.

    "She was aware that what she was doing was wrong, correct?" Assistant State Attorney Mark Simpson asked Lawrence at one point.

    "In some part of her brain, yes, but she couldn't control herself," Lawrence replied.

    "Did she understand she was stealing?"

    "I'm sure she did," Lawrence said.

    "No further questions."

    Between the fall of 2008 and summer 2010, investigators say, Dennison forged Laverne's name on checks, drained the couple's bank accounts and cashed in a pair of the couple's life insurance policies that totaled $36,000.

    Dennison admitted Wednesday that she gambled away most of the couple's savings but denied that she methodically, calculatingly stole. She said Scott Dennison, who had power of attorney for his parents, also gambled some of the money during a time when their own finances were in shambles.
    Scott Dennison was never charged and did not attend Wednesday's hearing. The couple have since divorced, but Dennison said they are living together despite a "strained" relationship.

    The former medical ultrasound instructor said she wants to get a job and start paying restitution. She turned to her former in-laws.

    "I know you are sitting there today and hate me, and I understand. But I'm so sorry," she said. "I want to make it right."

    She broke down in tears when Merritt announced the sentence. The judge rejected Denson's request to give Dennison a couple of days to get her affairs in order, and a bailiff led her away.

    http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/criminal/woman-receives-five-year-sentence-for-gambling-away-in-laws-savings/1275073

    Overdose postpones sentencing for Hernando woman who gambled her in-laws' savings

    Wednesday, November 14, 2012

    Woman accused of gambling in-laws' savings enters no-contest plea in Hernando

    Monday, August 27, 2012
     
    BROOKSVILLE — Laverne Dennison didn't believe a judge should be lenient on his daughter-in-law if a jury found her guilty of gambling away nearly all of the life savings he had planned to use to take care of his ailing wife, Janet.

    "Our dad asked for 20 years," said Vera Cannon, one of Laverne and Janet's six children.

    During a hearing Monday in Hernando County Circuit Court, Cannon and her siblings learned that Jennifer Dennison will not spend that long in prison for siphoning more than $500,000 from her in-laws and losing it in casino slot machines.

    Dennison, 44, pleaded no contest to one count of grand theft of $50,000 or more from a person older than 65. The count is a first-degree felony that carries a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison.
    As part of a plea agreement, however, Dennison will serve no more than 10 years in prison. Chief Circuit Judge Daniel B. Merritt Sr. approved the agreement and set Dennison's sentencing hearing for Nov. 14.
    Dressed in a black suit, Dennison answered Merritt's questions in a quiet voice during Monday's hearing. All of Laverne and Janet's children except Jennifer's ex-husband, Scott, of Brooksville, watched from the gallery.
    Statutory guidelines call for a minimum prison term of 21 months for Dennison, who has no prior criminal record. Prosecutors are happy with the deal, Assistant State Attorney Jarod Gilbert said after the hearing.

    "It saves resources, and she's accepted responsibility," Gilbert said.

    Merritt could depart from the required minimum prison term if he decides mitigating circumstances justify it. Dennison's attorney, Bruce Denson of St. Petersburg, said he will ask Merritt to sentence Dennison to probation without prison time.

    Dennison was motivated by a gambling addiction, Denson said. She completed a residential treatment program and is now receiving outpatient treatment.

    "There was no intent to steal any money," he said. "This was a pure compulsive gambling case."
    Dennison will certainly be ordered to pay restitution to the family. And it would be difficult for her to do that if she spends several years in prison, Denson noted.

    "Our hope is that she can be gainfully employed and make some strides in that effort," he said.
    The siblings reject the notion that Dennison simply fell victim to a compulsion.

    Between the fall of 2008 and summer 2010, investigators say, Jennifer forged Laverne's name on checks, drained at least six of her in-laws' bank accounts and cashed in a pair of the couple's life-insurance policies that totaled $36,000.

    "She had to gather this money methodically and slowly and deliberately," said Debbie Palmer, one of the couple's daughters. "Piece by piece, she emptied these accounts."

    Janet Dennison, now 75, suffers from advanced dementia and needs around-the-clock care. Laverne took care of her for some 14 years before he died of cancer in August 2011 at age 89. Janet now stays at Heartland of Brooksville, a skilled nursing and rehabilitation facility.

    As a retired postal worker, Janet brings in $2,400 a month — too much to be eligible for Medicaid to cover Heartland's roughly $6,800 monthly cost, Cannon said. Heartland has agreed to defer billing while the family seeks legal help to win Medicaid approval.

    The siblings said Dennison never apologized to their parents.

    Denson said his client is "extremely remorseful."

    "She realizes it's ruined her family's life."

    http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/criminal/woman-accused-of-gambling-in-laws-savings-enters-no-contest-plea-in/1248194

    Addict Gambled At SugarHouse as Child Died in Care



    Boy died at day care whose license was obtained with lie

    Isear Jeffcoat.
    Isear Jeffcoat.
    A 7-year-old Philadelphia boy who drowned in a murky backyard pool in June was enrolled in a day-care center that the state failed to close even after learning that the operator obtained her license by lying about her extensive criminal record, according to an official investigation into the death.

    In a "fatality review" obtained by The Inquirer, investigators said Isear Jeffcoat died while the operator, Tianna Edwards, 31, spent the day at the SugarHouse Casino.

    Gov. Corbett on Tuesday announced plans to suspend an unspecified number of Department of Public Welfare employees connected with the case.

    Edwards was arrested Jan. 18 by Philadelphia police and charged with involuntary manslaughter and endangering the welfare of a child. She faces a preliminary hearing Wednesday and is being held on $700,000 bail.

    In the scathing official review, investigators detailed the laggardly response of the state when confronted with information that Edwards obtained a state day-care license after using someone else's name and hiding her criminal past.

    Edwards had convictions in three counties on charges including fraud, theft, forgery, and illegal gun possession, court records show.

    The Governor's Office of General Counsel released a statement Tuesday announcing the planned suspensions after The Inquirer sought comment about the case.

    Following an initial internal investigation, Corbett ordered the hiring of an outside firm to further examine DPW's handling of the case, the statement said, and "additional personal actions may occur."

    "Protecting children remains a priority of the Corbett administration, and any circumstances that jeopardizes the health and safety of a child will not be tolerated," the statement said.

    The statement did not say which DPW employees had been suspended.

    "Those questions will be addressed when the investigation is completed," said Nils Hagen-Frederiksen, press secretary for the general counsel.

    The death review examined Isear's June 30, 2012, drowning while at Tianna's Terrific Tots, a day-care program run by Edwards. Edwards had taken Jeffcoat and 20 other children from her day-care center along Rising Sun Avenue to swim in a filthy, nine-foot inground pool at a private residence on the 6600 block of North Eighth Street, the review said.

    Shortly after arriving, Edwards left the children and went with another staff member to the casino, according to the report and police sources.

    The children were left in the care of two adult workers, one of whom had a criminal background that would prohibit him from being licensed to work with children, the review said.

    There were 15 children swimming in the pool, with one staff member watching, according to the report.

    When Isear did not surface, a worker called Edwards, who returned to look for the boy.

    "There are conflicting reports regarding whether some staff members jumped into the pool to look for Isear," the review reads.

    Such reviews are state-mandated in every child fatality and are conducted by a panel of child welfare experts, including medical professionals and police.

    The DPW knew as early as December 2011 that Edwards had opened her day-care centers under a false identity, the review said.

    After receiving a report of possible fraud involving Edwards, two officials from the state Office of Child Development and Early Learning met with representatives from the Philadelphia District
    Attorney's Office, who had recently charged Edwards with an unrelated crime - she allegedly stole her sister's identity to buy and burn a Jaguar for insurance money.

    During the 2011 meeting, DPW officials confirmed that Edwards had stolen the identity of her sister-in-law, Nikita Smith, to open the day-care centers.

    Although applicants for state day-care licenses are required to obtain fingerprint-based FBI clearances, they are not required to show photo identification when they submit their paperwork, the review said.

    In January 2012, months before Isear's death, the state inspector general opened an investigation into the identity theft.

    The DPW, at that point, "believed that they were to do nothing further until the investigation by the district attorney and inspector general were completed," the review said.

    In April, DPW officials visited Edwards' day-care center along Germantown Avenue, closing it for "site-specific violations" but not for any fraud violations.

    However, her facility on Rising Sun Avenue was not inspected and continued to operate. It took the death of Isear to trigger the closing of that facility.

    According to the report, Isear's mother, a resident of the Tioga section of the city, told investigators that her son had been attending the day-care facility for about six months.

    And she indicated to investigators that she knew that Edwards had obtained a license fraudulently.
    The mother also said she was aware that another child under Edwards' care had died.

    In 2010, a 2-year-old girl lost consciousness at one of Edwards' facilities and later was pronounced dead at Temple University Hospital.

    Her death was attributed to swallowing a battery, though it was unclear whether it happened while at Edwards' day-care center, the report said.

    Judging from the severity of the child's internal injuries, she may have ingested the battery a week earlier, a medical examiner said.

    Isear's death review team found that the DPW was aware of the earlier death.

    However, its sister agency in Philadelphia, the Department of Human Services, had no record of the earlier death, the report noted - even though state officials could document contact with the DHS to inform them of the fatality.

    Said DHS spokeswoman Alicia Taylor: "We did receive a phone call from DPW sometime after the death and are currently investigating how we handled the call."

    Among other criticisms of the response to Isear's death, the team reported that it was "astonished" that the state did not require applicants who wished to open a day-care center to provide a photo identification.

    It also condemned the system for failing to require updated criminal and child-abuse checks as part of the annual reinspecting process.

    It recommended that the state reconfirm the identity of all holders of licenses in Pennsylvania to operate day-care centers by checking their photo IDs at their next annual inspection.

    Court records show that Edwards has a lengthy criminal record and several aliases. She has been convicted in Philadelphia, Bucks and Montgomery Counties for crimes including fraud, theft, and giving a false identification to a police officer.

    At the time of Isear's death, she was on probation in the stolen identity case involving her sister.

    According to court documents, Edwards lived in Juniata Park with her young son.

    http://mobile.philly.com/news/?wss=%2Fphilly%2Fhp%2Fnews_update%2F&id=190963741&viewAll=y#more

    Caesars Staggering Debt



    Ohio casino gets gaming license despite debt issue

    February 13, 2013

    Wednesday, February 13, 2013

    Wonder where the letter is?



    Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe says it has received a favorable preliminary opinion from the BIA

    Tribe receives a positive letter from the Bureau of Indian Affairs

    No Such Thing As a "Destination Caino Resort"

    From our friends at Stop Predatory Gambling --

    Even Casino Operators Admit There’s No Such Thing As a “Destination Casino Resort”

    More Mashpee Wampanoag Fantasies



    Ruling backs Mashpee tribe's land claims


    Top Photo
    Tribal chairman Cedric Cromwell, left, and chief Vernon Lopez chat with guests as members
    of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe hosted an open house last May for residents of Taunton
    at the high school to showcase the tribe's plans for a casino in the town.
    Cape Cod Times File/Steve Heaslip

    The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe's application to have 146 acres taken into federal trust in Taunton for an Indian casino can move forward under a ruling by the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs.
     
    The decision does not completely clear the path for the tribe's proposed $500 million casino, but it does eliminate a significant hurdle.
     
    In a letter to the tribe dated Feb. 7, Assistant Secretary Kevin Washburn wrote that a "preliminary advisory opinion" indicates the Taunton land and 170 acres in Mashpee qualify as an initial reservation. The exemption is part of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act that would allow the tribe to offer gambling on the land if other criteria are met.
     
    In a press release, tribal council Chairman Cedric Cromwell called the letter "another huge step forward toward the development of a first-class destination resort casino in Taunton."
    Cromwell praised the speed of the review process.
     
    "They truly understand how important it is for our people to have land, to maintain our history, our language and our culture. This will enable us to fully operate as a sovereign tribal government, to secure the resources necessary to support ourselves, and to provide services such as housing, health care and education to our people," he said.
     
    The ruling is evidence that the BIA is convinced the tribe has "significant historic and modern ties" to the land.
     
    "It further demonstrates an Interior Department that is more willing to move quickly and definitively on these types of determinations," Steven Light, an Indian gaming expert at the University of North Dakota, said. "Put this federal action together with the groundwork the tribe has laid — land option, local political support, conversations with the state, application for land into trust — and the trajectory points toward success for the Mashpee."
     
    It's also significant because, if the application is approved completely, it gives the tribe authority to offer Class II gaming — bingo and so-called bingo slots — on the land with or without state approval. With a compact between the tribe and state, the Mashpee Wampanoag would be entitled to offer Class III gambling, which includes slots and table games like blackjack.
     
    A historian hired by the tribe, along with two tribe members, filed a report outlining the ties to land in Taunton. In essence, the document makes the case that the Mashpee Wampanoag is the only remaining mainland tribe of what was once the Pokanoket Nation. The Pokanoket homeland stretched from Rhode Island, east to the Cape and Islands and north to Gloucester covering all of Southeastern Massachusetts.
     
    Cohannut, which encompasses modern Taunton, Lakeville, Middleboro and Bridgewater, was an important "resource rich" area used by the Wampanoag for hunting, gathering and planting before English settlers took over the region, according to the tribe's historical account. After the bloody and deadly King Philip's War in 1675 and 1676, the Mashpee tribe, which stayed neutral, took in surviving Indians who weren't sold off as slaves, according to the report.
     
    The Mashpee tribe's claims to the land are disputed by state-recognized tribes and will likely be challenged in court, but the BIA's approval is a significant step for the Mashpee Wampanoag — one that critics have said they doubted would ever happen.
     
    Next, the tribe must convince the BIA that a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, known as the Carcieri decision, does not apply to them, Light said. That ruling called into question the federal government's authority to take land in trust for tribes recognized after 1934, the year of the Indian Reorganization Act, but left open the door that tribes might be able to show they were under federal jurisdiction.
    That's one of several "big hurdles" remaining for the tribe, Light said.
     
    Though the tribe was not federally recognized until 2007, it has made a legal argument that, among other things, an agreement with King George III to protect Mashpee Indian land should have been enforced by the United States.
     
    The BIA has yet to rule on whether Carcieri applies, but in a similar case the Cowlitz Tribe in Washington State was recently found to be under federal jurisdiction and its land was taken into trust.
     
    That decision was challenged immediately and the ongoing lawsuit is being watched closely by the Mashpee tribe and others across the country.
     
    An environmental review must also be completed by the Mashpee Wampanoag before the BIA makes its final decision on the tribe's land application.
     
    KG Urban Enterprises, a developer that hopes to build a commercial casino in New Bedford, declined to comment on the BIA letter.
     
    Elaine Driscoll, a spokeswoman for the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, said the BIA's action is one of several factors the commission will take into effect when it makes a decision next month whether to open Southeastern Massachusetts to commercial bids.
     
    Meanwhile, negotiations continue between the tribe and Gov. Deval Patrick to renegotiate a compact that was rejected by the BIA.
     
    "We remain focused on reaching an agreement that is fair to the commonwealth and the tribe," said Jason Lefferts, a spokesman for the state Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development.
     

    Tuesday, February 12, 2013

    Protecting a Community

    It's saddening to watch communities that have failed miserably in conducting their due dilgence and jeopardize the future solvency of their communities.

    One would hope the Plainville Planning Board acts to protect the Town's future!


    Here's a copy of the letter (email) I just sent to the Planning Board about last night's meeting. Feel free to pass it along.

    Best,
    Mary-Ann

    Dear Plainville Planning Board:

    I spent some time this morning looking at the By-law you referenced last night (§ 500-41. Commercial Interchange District.), and I still have the same concerns I had at your meeting.

    The By-law states, in part, that "The Planning Board will specify the depth and level of DIS analysis for each proposed development that is commensurate with the magnitude of the project . . . " [§ 500-41]

    Last night, you specified that "the depth and level of DIS analysis" will include a "cost-revenue fiscal analysis" done by (contracted for) the Board of Selectmen in preparation for their negotiations with Plainridge toward a Host Community Agreement. This would include:

    > [1] Conduct a cost-revenue fiscal analysis describing the cumulative impact the development shall have on Town financial resources.
    >
    > [2] Cost factors include the following: project effect on police and fire protection, highways and public works' service, solid waste and sewerage disposal facilities, educational services, recreational facility impact and health services.
    >
    > [3] Revenue factors, including the following: project effect on property taxes, water and sewer fees, vehicular taxes, licenses and fees, and miscellaneous business taxes.
    >
    > [4] The fiscal impact studies required herein shall be prepared using a methodology approved by the Planning Board during the presubmission conference. All local factors shall be determined from past municipal budgets, tax assessors' information, and other verifiable public records.

    I believe this means that the Board of Selectmen is conducting this part of the analysis on your behalf. However, Mr. Chairman, last night you said that the Planning Board "waived" the responsibility of overseeing or conducting the Fiscal Impact review. I don't believe you have the right to waive that responsibility. Rather, given the circumstances, you have specified that another board conduct and negotiate the review, which seems reasonable.

    As I read the By-law, however, upon completion of the cost-revenue fiscal analysis by the Board of Selectmen, it must come back to the Planning Board as part and parcel of the materials that must then be included in the public hearing for Change of Use:

    > G. Review procedures.
    >
    > (1) Public hearing. Within 65 days of the filing of a complete formal application for a special permit for a development in the CI District, the Planning Board shall hold a public hearing on the proposal. Notice of such public hearing shall be given in accordance with MGL c. 40A, § 11.
    >
    > (2) Review criteria. In making a decision on an application for a special permit in the CI District, the Planning Board shall consider the following:
    >
    > (a) The purpose of the Commercial Interchange District.
    >
    > (b) Health, safety and general welfare of the public.
    >
    > (c) Conservation and preservation of the natural environment.
    >
    > (d) Impacts on abutting properties and neighborhoods.
    >
    > (e) Proper drainage of the site.
    >
    > (f) Safe access to and from the development.
    >
    > (g) Capacity of the existing traffic network to accommodate projected increases.
    >
    > (h) Adequacy of proposed water, sewer, fire protection and public safety provisions.
    >
    > (i) Impacts on water resources, including wetlands, streams, water bodies, groundwater and floodplains.
    >
    > (j) Visual and aesthetic quality.
    >
    > (k) Impacts on municipal services and fiscal capacity. [Emphasis is mine.]
    >
    > (3) Decision on the special permit. The decision of the Planning Board shall be made within 90 days of the date of the public hearing, unless the decision period is extended by written agreement between the applicant and the Planning Board.
    >

    I read nothing in the By-law that would allow the Planning Board to "waive" this aspect of the public hearing you are required to conduct. Therefore, I believe that your public hearing cannot be convened before a cost-revenue fiscal analysis has been completed by the Board of Selectmen, and that your public hearing must include "Impacts on municipal services and fiscal capacity."

    Furthermore, because the process being used by the Board of Selectmen is opaque to the public, your public hearing about the Change of Use will be the only time that the public will be able to exercise its right — in a hearing governed by the Open Meeting Law — to respond to "Impacts on municipal services and fiscal capacity" as it relates to the Request for Change of Use.

    I would like this letter to become a part of the record of last night's meeting. I would also like a response to my interpretation of the By-law and your responsibility in this matter.

    Thank you.

    Sincerely,
    Mary-Ann Greanier


     

    Milford: Dragging the Swamps for this Duo?

    A 'developer' with experience even Nevada doubted, a Tribe that simply defaulted on its debt and a community that can't support the impacts.
     
    It simply doesn't get any better than the Nunes/Foxwoods/Milford combo.



    Milford group organizes to oppose casino

    By Ellen Ishkanian
    Globe Correspondent / February 9, 2013
     
    Milford residents ready to fight a planned casino in their community met last week with people from Holliston and Hopkinton who have been organizing against the proposal for the past year.

    The message from those already working on defeating the proposed $850 million “destination casino” on vacant land off Interstate 495, northwest of Route 16, was loud and clear: It’s Milford’s time to be heard.

    Some in the fledgling group of about 12 people from Milford said the small number who showed up at the informal meeting belies the opposition the proposal will face.

    “I’ve lived here my whole life and I’m ready to fight, and so are a lot of other people,” said Elaine Pagucci, who lives about a mile from the proposed casino site.
     
    Milford resident Jim Flanagan, who said he lives five houses from where the casino is being proposed, is also on board.

    “This is a residential neighborhood; it’s just not the place for it,” he said.

    Colorado developer David Nunes and his company, Crossroads Massachusetts LLC, met the state’s Jan. 17 deadline for filing an application — accompanied by the $400,000 fee — with minutes to spare, setting into motion a process that will determine whether his proposal will be selected by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission to receive the single resort casino license reserved for Eastern Massachusetts.
     
    The Milford proposal is competing against applications from Suffolk Downs, in partnership with Caesars Entertainment, in East Boston and Revere, and from Wynn Resorts, founded by Las Vegas casino magnate Steve Wynn, who is looking at industrial land in Everett.
     
    In Milford, casino proponents say there could be significant advantages to allowing the proposal, including an estimated $8 million to $10 million in annual tax revenue and the creation of hundreds of jobs. Proponents also say the project would attract people to the area who would patronize already established businesses.
     
    Barry Feingold, president and chief executive of the Milford Area Chamber of Commerce, said he is excited by the potential boost to the region’s economic development from an $800 million investment in the community. [Where has it ever? Someone's imbibing in too much Casino KoolAid!]

     

    But, he said, it is way too early in the process to take a firm position on whether the pros will outweigh the cons.

    “It’s going to be up to the people of Milford, and I think their sentiments right now mirror that of the Board of Selectmen, which is that we really need to get more information before we can make a decision on this,” said Feingold, who did not attend last week’s meeting.

    He said his sense, as someone who speaks with business leaders and residents every day, is that the people of Milford are pretty evenly divided on the project.



    “I talk to people on both sides,” he said.
     
    Feingold said the proposed access ramp linking Interstate 495 with the casino site is a must before the project could get his endorsement, and the resort’s effect on town services will have to be weighed against the jobs and revenue that would come into the area.

    “This is a huge project, there will certainly be hundreds of people hired just to build it,” he said.
    Opponents at last week’s meeting said they plan to mobilize to defeat it at the polls.

    “Milford is the host community; Milford has to say no,” said John Seaver, a lifelong town resident and former member of the Board of Selectmen. “Area towns need to support the effort, but the focus and the face of the opposition now needs to be Milford.”

    While work has been done behind the scenes by a Holliston-based group, Casino-Free Milford, including setting up a website and Facebook page, gathering e-mail contacts, and organizing a petition drive, it was hoped the effort would be unnecessary.

    But the last-minute decision by Nunes to move forward with his plans means those opposed have about eight months to prepare before a townwide vote in Milford could be held to decide the project’s fate.

    “Nothing was serious until Nunes spent the $400,000,’’ Holliston Selectman John D. Leary Jr. told last week’s gathering. “Now is the time to get the organization started. We’re here to give the people of Milford the help they need, but you don’t have a month, you need to get started with weekly meetings.”

    Milford’s Board of Selectmen could end the project before it even gets to a town vote, as was the case in Foxborough, where selectmen voted against entering into negotiations with Wynn, who with New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft had proposed building a casino on land across Route 1 from Gillette Stadium.

    But Milford Selectman Brian W. Murray, the board’s chairman, who attended but did not speak at the informal meeting, said it is too early to make any decisions on whether the plan should move forward.

    “That’s a premature question, because there is no proposal before the town,” he said.
    Murray said he is still waiting to see whether Nunes will pass the first phase of the process, which is a check of his finances and background.
     
    “We haven’t been presented any financial information," he said. “There’s nothing there yet, it’s basically just gathering information.”

    The Milford residents and those from neighboring towns at the meeting are not counting on selectmen to stop the project. Instead, they say, they are ready to sway voters.

    “The most important thing is not the selectmen,” Seaver said. “We need to keep the focus on the referendum and the five or six thousand voters who will decide this.”

    Seaver said he will be a part of a core group that will meet biweekly to organize against the proposal, building grass-roots support through e-mail chains and by word of mouth, preparing for what he thinks will be an eventual vote on a proposal next fall.

    He said fund-raising will be done to purchase more lawn signs, produce fliers, and buy advertisements, but utilizing social media and old-fashioned door-to-door campaigning will be the focus.

    “This is not about whether or not you are pro or con gambling; that horse is out of the barn,” said
    Holliston resident John Vosburg, land manager for the New England Mountain Bike Association, which owns land next to the proposed casino site. “This is about the location, and speaking with a common voice saying that this isn’t the place for a casino.”

    Arguments against the proposal will likely focus on the proposed site’s location in the middle of a neighborhood of single-family homes, a casino’s effect on local property values, traffic, and ground water, and its toll on police and fire departments, schools, and other town services.

    “Everyone assumes [the license] will go to Boston, but we have to hope for the best and plan for the worst,” Ken Rockett, a spokesman for Casino-Free Milford, told the meeting. “We’re here tonight to plan for the worst.’’

    http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2013/02/10/some-milford-residents-say-they-will-mobilize-against-casino-proposal/LJ3NYKkPMxAmTbXsKQmDQJ/story-1.html
     
    Ellen Ishkanian can be reached at eishkanian@gmail.com.end of story marker


    Foxwoods jumps into fray for eastern Mass. casino

    By STEPHEN SINGER
    Associated Press / February 11, 2013
     
    HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Connecticut’s Foxwoods Resort Casino has joined the race to open a casino in eastern Massachusetts.

    CEO Scott Butera told The Associated Press on Monday that it is working with real estate developer David Nunes to compete for a casino in Milford, about 40 miles west of Boston.
     
    Building a casino just 70 miles from Foxwoods in southeast Connecticut will not lead to destructive competition between the two casinos, but help bring in customers in Connecticut and Massachusetts, which ‘‘will hopefully lead to growth in both markets,’’ he said.
     
    Butera and Nunes have known each other for years, and Nunes ‘‘reached out to me some time ago,’’ Butera said. Nunes already has reached an agreement with the town of Milford to build an $850 million resort casino.

    Foxwoods, the largest casino in the Western Hemisphere, is the right partner because it’s the most familiar with the New England gambling market, Nunes said.
     
    ‘‘To me it was a no-brainer in terms of attracting the best company to manage the operation for us,’’ he said.

    The Nunes venture, Crossroads Massachusetts, will compete for the eastern Massachusetts resort casino license with Suffolk Downs in Boston and Steve Wynn, who has proposed a casino for Everett.

    ‘‘I don’t think the competition is as daunting now that we have Foxwoods on board,’’ Nunes said.
     
    Butera would not disclose how much Foxwoods would invest in the Massachusetts venture, only that ‘‘we’re making a substantial commitment.’’

    Revenue at Foxwoods and its Connecticut rival, the Mohegan Sun, has been under tremendous pressure for several years as consumers pulled back spending on entertainment in the recession and weak recovery that followed and because of rising casino competition in the Northeast.
     
    Butera said Foxwoods is not counting on a strong recovery in the economy, which has so far been anemic.
     
    ‘‘Certainly, we hope for that,’’ he said. ‘‘If that happens, we'll have a very strong project that will do quite well. We’re planning for very moderate growth.’’

    Mohegan Sun also has been working to get a foothold in Massachusetts. The casino, which is run by the Mohegan tribe, has been courting Palmer officials and residents in advance of its application for a state permit to open a casino in western Massachusetts.

    The Mashantuckets agreed last year to restructure $2.2 billion in debt. Bond holders received new securities with lengthened maturity dates and holders of subordinated special revenue obligations receive new debt at a discount to face value of accrued principal and interest.
     
    Butera has said increased gambling competition was forcing Foxwoods to shift its business to include more nongambling enterprises such as retail and conferences.

    Separately, Springfield Mayor Domenic Sarno announced on Monday that he would negotiate host community agreements with MGM Resorts International and Penn National Gaming, which have proposed casino developments for the western Massachusetts city.

    The decision follows a review process and could result in Springfield voters choosing from two casino proposals. Under the state’s casino gambling law, any host community agreement that is reached between a city and a developer must be approved by voters.

    MGM Resorts International has proposed a resort casino and entertainment complex in downtown Springfield. Penn National Gaming, in partnership with Peter Pan Bus Lines chairman Peter Picknelly, has proposed one in the city’s North End.

    Hard Rock International, which has plans for a casino resort at the Eastern States Exhibition in West Springfield, also hopes to compete for the western Massachusetts license.

    Foxwoods jumps into fray for eastern Mass. casino - News - Boston ...

    Mashpee Wampanoag/Genting: Middleboro or Taunton?

     Or maybe both?

    Nemo may have changed the Wampanoag Tribe's casino location

    Storm postpones yesterday's Wampanoag election

    Monday, February 11, 2013

    Ohio removing Slots for Under-Performance, Wait for the Bailouts

    The Gambling Industry showered Ohio with $$$$$ after Ohio voters refused to support Predatory Gambling for the umpteenth time.

    Was it $60 MILLION? Was it the 5th or 6th time....after voters said emphatically  NO! ?




    Not content with their pathetic return, wait for the state to bail them out!


    Ohio Casinos Buck Normal Trend, Remove Slots For Poker Tables

    During the 1990s, the normal trend in casinos was to remove – or even eliminate – poker tables and rooms to make way for more slot machines. The reason was simple: the slots drew in more money than what could be pulled in from the rake on poker. In the new casinos in Ohio, there are moves being made that are bucking that normal trend.

    The Columbus Dispatch’s Steve Wartenberg reports that the Hollywood Casino in Columbus will be gutting 500 slot machines from their playing floor for an expansion of their poker room. The Hollywood had a six table poker room for its players but, after analysis of the revenues coming in since its debut four months ago, has decided to put in an additional 30 tables to bring the total to 36.

    “We’ve always talked about how when you first open, you basically make your best estimate of what games will be popular,” Wartenberg quotes Bob Tenenbaum, a spokesman for Hollywood Columbus, as saying. “We’ve been open four months now and are at the point at which we’ve been able to establish patterns and see what’s popular. The poker room has been way more popular than we anticipated.”

    Originally, the Hollywood held approximately 3000 slot machines, but the revenues from that venue have been less than what was expected by the ownership of the casino, Penn National Gaming. In the month of December, each machine only generated $115, a decline from November’s average take of $137, according to numbers provided by Wartenberg. The Chief Executive Officer of Penn National, Timothy Wilmott, admitted that the slot revenue was a concern in a January conference call with investors, stating “I thought we’d be further ahead in slot volumes than we actually are.”

    With the expansion of the poker room (and the ability to expand a bar area in the casino), Hollywood Casino is looking to increase that revenue. The revenues of poker are tricky, however. In Ohio, the rake on poker is 10% of the pot and is capped at $6. In Las Vegas, for example, the average daily revenue for poker tables in $414, but much of that is eaten up in paying dealers, floor staff and wait staff.

    On the other hand, a slot machine costs between $18,000 and $25,000 and needs little but some maintenance by technicians on site. The revenues from slots are normally divvied up between the host casino and the developer of the particular slot machine.

    It appears, however, that the Hollywood is looking beyond that in expanding its poker room. “Poker brings in a lot of people to the casino,” Tenenbaum said to Wartenberg. “They’ll play other games, they’ll have a meal, and maybe they’ll stay for the entertainment.”

    The Ohio gaming scene is a particularly tough one and the move to provide more poker for its clientele could set it apart from its competition. There were three casinos as of 2009, but four more were allowed to open after that. Located in seven different cities around the state, these casinos are looking to keep their citizens at home to take part of casino offerings rather than see that money move to other states.

    Pennsylvania is one state that has increased its casinos, potentially in a move to pull away the Ohio action, and West Virginia has many popular poker rooms that used to be a draw for Ohio’s rounders. Add in Indiana and Michigan and you can see that the competition for casino action in the Midwest is quite strong.

    Wartenberg states that, even with the reduction in the number of slot machines, the Hollywood Casino would still have the largest number of slot machines in the state. With the expansion of the poker room – and perhaps the possibility of having larger cash games and tournaments in mind – the Hollywood Casino Columbus might be setting a “new normal” when it comes to the world of casinos.


    http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/ohio-casinos-buck-normal-trend-remove-slots-for-poker-tables-23248/

    Friday, February 8, 2013

    Subsidizing Horse Racing

    The Scam - Horse Racing is dying so Slot Barns should subsidize the Racing Industry....and then they don't.

    Horseracing group says budget depletes funding

    Written by Mary Wilson | Feb 8, 2013



    Horse.jpg



    (Harrisburg) -- A horseracing industry group says the governor’s budget gallops away with too much money from a fund that supports it.
     
    The Pennsylvania Equine Coalition is taking issue with Governor Corbett’s proposal to draw $31 million out of the Race Horse Development Fund for agricultural programs and other line items.

    Last year, more than $54 million was diverted from the fund, but a spokesman for the industry group says this year’s plan is not an improvement, because revenues to the fund are on the decline.

    The money in the fund is generated from slots gaming at casinos with racetracks.
    Revenues are down due to competition from racetracks in other states as well as competition from other casinos without horse racing.

    The Corbett administration is expecting the fund to collect more than 300 million dollars by the end of the fiscal year in July, but the spokesman for the PA Equine Coalition says it’ll be lucky if the fund has 266 million dollars by then.

    http://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/2013/02/horseracing-group-says-budget-takes-too-much-money.php

    Detroit Faces Takeover



    Detroit promised its 3 casinos would stabilize its finances; city now faces takeover for spiraling deficits.

    http://buswk.co/WVyjEC via @BW



    Casinos Saturating U.S. Midwest Cannibalize Revenue Windfalls
    A file photo shows the entrance to the Horseshoe Casino near Chicago in Hammond, Indiana during September 2003. Photographer: John Zich/Bloomberg

    Bloomberg News

    Casinos Saturating U.S. Midwest Cannibalize State Revenue


    By Mark Niquette and Chris Christoff on February 07, 2013
     
    Mike Thomas, a retired salesman for a truck manufacturer, says odds are that he’ll stop driving 45 minutes five days a week from Ohio to play slot machines at Hollywood Casino in Lawrenceburg, Indiana .

    Instead, he and his wife, Sandy, expect to do their betting at the Horseshoe Casino in downtown Cincinnati, set to open next month about 15 miles (24 kilometers) from their suburban home. He doesn’t think he’ll be alone, noting that most cars in the Indiana casino’s garage bore Ohio plates.

    “They’re going to lose a lot of customers,” said Thomas, a 75-year-old in an Ohio State Buckeyes sweatshirt and cap. “I’m not going to drive 40 miles if I can do as well there.”
    The Cincinnati casino will be the fourth to open in Ohio since voters approved them in 2009, and as many as seven horse tracks with slots also are planned. Yet even as revenue at the Ohio casinos has missed projections, they’re siphoning money from Indiana and Michigan (STOMI1). With most major Midwest markets now served, states that rely on gambling taxes for schools and other services are fighting for a piece of the action.

    “It’s close to the saturation point,” Alex Bumazhny, director in Fitch Rating’s Gaming, Lodging & Leisure group, said in a telephone interview from New York. “It’s almost a zero-sum game whenever a new casino opens.”

    Ben’s Bets

    Atlantic City, the New Jersey resort that ruled the East Coast market for three decades after the first casino opened in 1978, is floundering after six years of declining revenue as a result of losing business to casinos in neighboring states. Pennsylvania, which opened its first gambling house in 2006 and now has 11, passed New Jersey in 2012 to become the second- largest U.S. betting market after Nevada.

    Gambling has a long history as a pillar of U.S. public finance. A half-dozen lotteries sponsored by the likes of Benjamin Franklin and George Washington operated in the 13 colonies to pay for building projects, according to the American Gaming Association. Nevada in 1931 became the first state to legalize casinos, and now people can bet in every state except Utah and Hawaii. Commercial casinos operate in 23 states and tribal ones in 29, according to the association.

    The market is especially crowded around the new $400 million Cincinnati casino developed by Rock Ohio Caesars LLC, a venture of Caesars Entertainment Corp. and Rock Gaming LLC.

    Falling Revenue

    Within about 50 miles, there are three places to gamble in Indiana -- the Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg run by Penn National Gaming Inc, Pinnacle Entertainment Inc. (PNK)’s Belterra Casino Resort & Spa in Florence and the Rising Star Casino Resort owned by Full House Resorts Inc. in Rising Sun. Pinnacle also plans a new track with slots -- a “racino” -- at Cincinnati’s River Downs horse track.

    Tax revenue from Indiana’s 13 betting sites has declined every year since 2009, according to the state Gaming Commission. Projections for the next two fiscal years assume about $120 million less because of Ohio competition, Chris Atkins, director of the Indiana Office of Management and Budget, said in a telephone interview from Indianapolis. A forecast by the state’s Revenue Forecast Technical Committee in December pointed to “continuing casino market saturation.”
    Meanwhile, the Hollywood Casino Toledo near the Michigan- Ohio border, which Penn National opened on May 29, may be siphoning business from Detroit’s three casinos.

    Border Jumpers

    In the first seven months that the Hollywood was open, Detroit casinos’ combined gross receipts fell 2.5 percent to $796.5 million compared with the same 2011 period, according to the Michigan Gaming Control Board.

    “We see large amounts of people coming from Michigan,” said John McNamara, spokesman for the Hollywood.

    Michigan also has 22 casinos run by autonomous Indian tribes, and a casino operates in Windsor, Ontario, across the Detroit River in Canada. It all adds up to bad news for Detroit (984FMF), which faces a possible state takeover because of spiraling deficits. The city anticipates a $10.4 million drop in casino- tax revenue for the fiscal year that ends June 30. The 5.7 percent decrease would be the largest since the casinos opened in 1999 and 2000.

    The gambling parlors had been “a godsend,” providing steady revenue while other sources dried up, said Bettie Buss, senior research associate for the nonprofit Citizens Research Council of Michigan, which analyzes state and local government.
    Yet the casinos making Detroit suffer are no panacea for their states.

    Slow Going

    Revenue at the casinos that opened last year in Cleveland, Toledo and Columbus  has been short of projections by the Ohio Department of Taxation in 2009, according to Mike Sobul, a former employee who helped calculate them and now is a Columbus financial consultant to local governments and schools.

    Timothy J. Wilmott, president of Penn National, said in a Jan. 31 conference call that while the company is “seeing a slower ramp-up” in slots revenue than expected in Toledo and Columbus, he thinks the market needs time to develop.

    Indiana lawmakers are considering ways bolster the industry. A bill by state Senator Phil Boots, a Crawfordsville Republican, would allow casinos to keep more revenue and gambling riverboats to move inland. It may be just a holding action.

    “You lose your ability to out-entice somebody because everybody is pretty much the same, and everybody is on the same playing field,” Mark Nichols, a professor of economics at the University of Nevada, Reno, and its Institute for the Study of Gambling & Commercial Gaming, said in a telephone interview. “Then it just comes down to location.”

    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-02-07/casinos-saturating-u-dot-s-dot-midwest-cannibalize-state-revenue#p2

    Plainville Planning Board Meeting




    Plainville Planning Board MeetingMonday, February 11th
    Plainville Senior Center
    9 School Street

    Meeting begins at 7PM.
    At 8PM: "Ourway Realty [Plainridge] Pre-Submission Conference regarding Request for Change in Use."
    (The change in use is from racetrack to racino.)


    Our grave concern is that the Planning Board will be pushed into deciding about a permit before the town hires a consultant and does a real cost benefit analysis of slots in our town. We are also concerned that the Board of Selectmen is already negotiating with Plainridge, absent a consultant, and that the negotiation process remains opaque to the people of Plainville. The Planning Board process is more accessible and open to residents of Plainville and surrounding towns, and they must be urged to wait until they have much more information before even beginning to discuss this Change in Use.



    Please attend, if you can. Please pass this along to other concerned citizens.

    "In gambling, the many must lose so that the few may win." - George Bernard Shaw






    Sole Applicant Hired By Gambling Commission for $180,000




    Massachusetts Gaming Commission hires Richard Day as executive director

    Dan Ring, The Republican By Dan Ring, The Republican
    on February 07, 2013
     
    day.jpgN. Richard Day fields questions from the Massachusetts Gaming
    Commission and then was hired as the panel's new executive director.
     
     
    The Massachusetts Gaming Commission Thursday hired a casino regulator in Washington state to be its new executive director.

    The commission tapped N. Richard "Rick" Day as its $180,000-a-year executive director. Since 2001, Day, 59, has worked as director of the Washington State Gambling Commission, leading 150 employees.

    Stephen P. Crosby, chairman of the commission, said the hiring of Day will make a huge difference for the commission.

    Day is expected to start work in Massachusetts in about a month. He will be in charge of the commission's staff. He also will oversee the licensing of employees and contractors, freeing commission members to focus on the criteria for evaluating applications for casino licenses, Crosby said.

    "He has 11 years of experience running a facility similar in size to the one we will be," Crosby said. 

    OH???

    "He knows this business cold. He has a great law enforcement background. It's very exciting."

    Commission members interviewed Day during their meeting before agreeing unanimously on a voice vote to hire him. Commissioner Bruce Stebbins, who was in charge of the search for the executive director, recommended Day to the commission.

    Day said the casinos in the state of Washington are different from those expected in Massachusetts.

    Washington has 28 casinos operated by Indian tribes, sixty "mini-casinos," including card games, and 3,500 organizations, including nonprofits, with some form of gambling.

    Massachusetts is moving to license three casino resorts around the state, including one in Western Massachusetts, and one slots facility. One casino resort is currently reserved in the southeast part of the state for the Wampanoag Tribe of Mashpee.

    Day said he is looking forward to the opportunity to do "something really remarkable" by helping create a new state agency in Massachusetts.

    The commission began operating about 10 months ago, after approval of the state's casino law in November 2011. The commission has 23 employees and is expected to eventually have about 150.

    "Your experience is exactly what we need," commissioner Gayle Cameron told Day.

    Day is a former director of the Montana Department of Corrections, working at that job from 1995 to 2000.

    He started his career as a police officer with departments in Bozeman, Belgrade and West Yellowstone, Montana.

    During his interview, Day said gaming regulators should not be a barrier to the industry.

    "Generally, I think it is essential to make sure you are working with people to promote compliance," Day said.

    http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/02/massachusetts_gaming_commissio_11.html
     

    Picknelly Food Fight Heads to Court




    Northeast Gaming of Palmer sues Peter Picknelly, Penn National Gaming over Springfield casino deal

    Penn National Gaming
    Penn National Gaming introduces their plans for a Springfield casino during a gala event at the Paramount Theater in downtown Springfield on Dec. 20, 2012. Shown here at the event are from left, Peter A. Picknelly, chief executive officer of Springfield-based Peter Pan Bus Lines; Peter M. Carlino, CEO of Penn National; and football celebrity Doug Flutie. (Republican Staff photo by Don Treeger)
                        
    Robert Rizzuto, The Republican By Robert Rizzuto, The Republican
    on February 07, 2013
     
    A local real estate group hoping to see its land become the site of the sole Western Massachusetts casino has filed a lawsuit against Penn National Gaming and Springfield businessman Peter Picknelly, alleging that he breached a contract with them by partnering to push another casino site.
    Northeast Gaming Group Inc., an associate of Northeast Realty which owns the land in Palmer where Mohegan Sun hopes to build, is claiming its business plan was hurt when Picknelly walked away from a deal to partner with Penn National Gaming to develop a casino in the northern edge of downtown Springfield.

    The lawsuit reiterates what Northeast Gaming's lawyer, Stephen Spelman said last month when he called on Picknelly to honor his original contract with the Palmer developers.

    "Mr. Picknelly betrayed the Palmer venture by actively working against it with Penn National Gaming, even though at the same time he continued to keep his interest in the Palmer project," Spelman wrote in an email.

    In 2008, Picknelly invested $500,000 in the Palmer group's venture and signed an agreement to give him a return on that investment of three percent of the group's net revenues from the development of the gaming, entertainment and retail complex, the lawsuit states.

    A key point of contention to be settled by the courts is whether the revenue-sharing agreement constitutes a partnership, like Northeast Gaming alleges, or not.

    The lawsuit also claims that Picknelly pushed Northeast Realty's manager Leon Dragone of Longmeadow to grant him a significant role in the venture, particularly a larger stake than his brother Paul held, prior to Paul Picknelly's move to team with MGM Resorts International to develop a casino in Springfield's South End.

    The lawsuit contends that on Oct. 11, when Penn National announced its partnership with the CEO of Peter Pan Bus Lines, to develop a casino on land including the site of The Republican newspaper, he violated his original agreement by helping a direct competitor for the sole casino license.
    Penn National Gaming is also listed as a defendant in the lawsuit for its alleged role as a partner with Peter Picknelly and the purported affect it had on the Palmer group's business proposition to build a rural casino.

    One of Picknelly's lawyers, Michael Callan, said the lawsuit was "frivolous" and that they plan to file a counter-suit.

    "This is extortionate and some of the most egregious charges in their lawsuit are based on a third-party's statements," Callan said. "It is outrageous, the slanderous things they are saying about Peter Picknelly. And for them to try to re-frame the revenue-sharing agreement as a partnership agreement is a cheap shot bordering on the unprofessional. We are not concerned about the claims made in this lawsuit at all."

    Eric Schippers, senior vice president for public affairs at Penn National Gaming, added "To continue to press forward with such a frivolous case is unfortunate, and is a clear sign that this group has zero confidence in their ability to compete fairly for the Western Massachusetts casino license. As we've said before, we have thoroughly reviewed the matter and the underlying agreement, and find the claims to be without any legal merit whatsoever."

    A copy of the lawsuit, as filed Thursday in Hampden Superior Court, can be seen below.
    NE Gaming Group v Peter Picknelly and Penn Nat'l Gaming Complaint


    http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/02/peter_picknelly_sued_by_palmer.html