Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Compulsive gambling is 'the hidden addiction'






Compulsive gambling is 'the hidden addiction'



They call it "the hidden addiction." There's no physical sign of it. Nothing is ingested. You can't overdose on it. People with the problem can often go a long time before anyone close to them becomes aware of it. By then, it is often too late to prevent the devastating consequences.

Problem gambling leads to stealing, loan sharking, suicide, domestic abuse, homicide. It destroys families, leaving loved ones feeling shocked and bewildered, not to mention angry and betrayed.

Homes, businesses, jobs, savings, relationships all disappear as the compulsive gambler drags those most important to him or her down the desperate path to getting even.





We don't hear much about that aspect of gambling these days, what with virtually every state trying to figure out a way to balance its budget by allowing more ways for people to gamble legally. Indeed, as opportunities to gamble have increased in New York, with racinos and seemingly a new lottery game every week, and as politicians talk about allowing more full-fledged casinos, the funding for education, prevention and treatment of problem gambling in the state has been slashed to a lip-service level.

• For treatment, information, or to set up a Gamblers Anonymous group: The Recovery Center - 794-8080, ext. 191; the center is at 396 Broadway, Monticello.
• For information from OASAS: 877-8-HOPENY, 24 hours a day, seven days a week
• For Gamblers Anonymous meetings: gamblersanonymous.org
Bob Gaydos

According to the New York Council on Problem Gambling, a not-for-profit independent corporation dedicated to increasing public awareness about the problem and advocating for support services, New York allots about $1 million for the effort. 
















The state agency responsible for dealing with compulsive gambling, the Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services, states on its website, "Roughly one million New Yorkers are dealing with problem gambling." So that's about a dollar per problem gambler, the price of a scratch-off ticket.




Still, there is help available. Sullivan County is one of only 15 that have a facility offering an outpatient treatment program for problem gambling. The Recovery Center in Monticello primarily treats alcohol and substance abuse issues (as do the other 14), but it also has five certified alcoholism and substance abuse counselors trained to help problem gamblers and their families.

Izetta Briggs-Bollings, CEO of the Recovery Center, also supervises its gambling treatment program. She notes that while gambling games have become ever more seductive, "to keep you coming back," a similar effort has not been made to make casinos more accountable for protecting their customers from their worst instincts, the way bars are expected to recognize and stop customers who have had too much to drink.









She'd also like to see the state devote a penny out of every dollar raised through legal gambling to the education and treatment of problem gambling.

Next week: Part 2 on "the hidden addiction"







States Go To Casinos, But Does The Gamble Pay Off?


From: Stop Predatory Gambling -





PA journalist who covers casinos tells NPR about how govt's experiment with casinos is failing. http://t.co/pgmCW861


States Go To Casinos, But Does The Gamble Pay Off?

Maryland and Ohio are the latest states turning to casinos to help address tight budgets. The Philadelphia Inquirer's Suzette Parmley reports on gambling and says that nationwide, casinos brought in about $33 billion in 2011. Parmley speaks with host Michel Martin about the growth of legal gaming and the potential costs to the people who play.

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

This is TELL ME MORE from NPR News. I'm Michel Martin. Coming up, we'll meet a couple who didn't just worry when their daughters started coming home making disparaging comments about their own looks. They decided to surround the girls with positive messages that they, too, are beautiful. We'll meet them and hear what they did in just a few minutes.

But, first, to matters of personal finance and the economy. And you know those two things are often linked and we noticed that, these days, a number of states facing tight budgets are turning to casinos. Maryland and Ohio are just the latest.

Our next guest has been covering the spread of legal gaming around the country and she tells us that, last year, casino gambling brought in almost $33 billion in revenue and you can see the appeal. State officials get excited about the promise of more money for schools and other programs, as well as the jobs, but with every new casino comes the question about the cost for the people who play, as well as the question of whether there are hidden costs that aren't being considered.

Here to talk more about this is journalist Suzette Parmley. She has reported on gaming all over the world and is a gambling and hotels reporter at the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Thank you so much for joining us.

SUZETTE PARMLEY: Thank you, Michel, for having me. My pleasure.

MARTIN: And the fact that there is a gambling, hotels and tourism reporter at a mainstream publication like the Philadelphia Inquirer kind of tells you something, doesn't it, about just what an important industry this has become?

PARMLEY: Absolutely. I can just tell you, from my perch, I'm surround by casinos. I have three in Delaware, I have 11 now in Pennsylvania, I have 12 just 60 miles away in Atlantic City and then you have Maryland to the south, which just opened its third casino.

MARTIN: And it seems as though, you know, for years, there seemed to have been so much resistance to expanding legal gaming. Why now? Why are more states interested in legal gaming now?

PARMLEY: In states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland - the most recent - it all has to do with budget deficits. It's the magic elixir whenever a state needs additional revenue without having to raise taxes.

MARTIN: And the opposition that we have heard in past years - why is it that the opposition doesn't seem to hold as much sway as they had in the past?

PARMLEY: I think a lot has to do with, Michel, the economy. And you're lawmaker. You're turning to gaming as a creation of both revenue and jobs to what people say - to the cost of who's the population you're going to mostly impact by this? Those that are elderly, those that can least afford to gamble, those that have no control, and now you're bringing casinos within 10 minutes of their homes. So that is the pact you've made with almost the devil here. You're generating this for the state, but you're also going to impact a demographic that can't handle it.

MARTIN: Well, talk to me a little bit more about that. And, if you're just joining us, we're talking with Suzette Parmley. She covers gambling, hotels and tourism for the Philadelphia Inquirer and we're talking about the fact that a number of states are adding casinos and other forms of legalized gambling now, and it seems to be spreading much more quickly than it had in the past.

We're talking about the fact that the critics of this say that, you know, this is essentially enticing to people who can least afford it. But is that true? You know, when you see the ads for new casinos, they always feature kind of young couples, you know, like a night out on the town type of deal. Now, is that the typical gambling customer?

PARMLEY: I can tell you this, Michel. The quintessential customer is the 55-year-old female slots player. That is the majority and slots pay 70 percent of the bills in casinos. Then you have the table games customer, which is the late 20s, 30s, 40-year-old male.

And then you have that 30 percent, which you see in every casino that I've been in - in Pennsylvania, Atlantic City - is the elderly. They're retired. They're living off their pension and social security checks and you see a lot of them with canes and wheelchairs in these casinos. But mind you, these are people without a steady income. They're literally gambling away their pensions and Social Security checks. I've written about it. I see it constantly when I go into casinos in any state.

MARTIN: Tell me more about that. How do we know that people are gambling away their Social Security and their pension checks?

PARMLEY: When you interview them, they tell you up front. They know in their mind, this is not what you should be doing with your money and your check coming in monthly, but it becomes almost an addictive form of behavior for them. A lot of them have mobility issues, so the easiest form of entertainment for them becomes planting themselves in front of a slot machine for three or four hours at a time, and not move, and just plug that money into the machine, whatever it takes to, you know, get that form of entertainment and that becomes it for them.

MARTIN: Do the casinos actually offer the economic shot in the arm that jurisdictions believe that they will? What do we know, over time - since you've been covering this, you know, for years now - does the promise actually meet reality?

PARMLEY: It does, initially. I'll explain what happens over time, though. In late 2006, when the first casino opened in Pennsylvania, it was mid-November. We now have 11. It's created about 15,000 jobs in the state of Pennsylvania, but that tends to slow down after time and those 15,000 jobs - believe it or not - a big chunk of them came from Atlantic City. Those casinos, there, have lost about 10,000 employees.

So what the critics are saying - you're not really creating new jobs and you're really not creating new revenue. You're redistributing it to these different states and you're taxing it the most, you know, vulnerable population who could least afford to do it to create these so-called jobs and revenue. It's a redistribution - according to their mind.

MARTIN: And now, what about the next frontier of gambling, which is online gaming that you talked about? Do you expect to see an increased acceptance of online gaming?

PARMLEY: As technology continues to move forward, this has been on the plate of several legislatures, including New Jersey, which is tackling it right now. For New Jersey, it was vetoed by Governor Christie last year and it's still in a kind of a holding pattern right now because of issues he has - the governor has - with regulating it.

Delaware just passed an online gaming bill earlier this month. It's the key issue at the Global Gaming Conference this coming October, which I will be attending, on what this frontier holds and Congress is trying to figure out ways to regulate it. Do you have a national tax on it? Do you let the states decide how much tax to tax it?

For Atlantic City, they're saying, we just need that competitive edge to be able to offer it in our casinos by offering online gaming at servers in 11 to 12 casinos there. So, again, the issue is how do you regulate it? It all comes down - again, this might be the worst form of addictive form of gambling, online.

MARTIN: And let's end this conversation where it started, which is on this whole question of the addictive nature of it. Is there any sign that some of the regulations that states have already put into place have any effect? Like states, for example, require casinos to have warnings and 800 numbers before they can open, you know, with counselors kind of available to talk to the...

PARMLEY: Exclusionary lists. Right.

MARTIN: Right. Exclusionary lists for people who have demonstrated that they have an inability to control their spending or gambling, things of that sort. Is there any evidence that this works?

PARMLEY: I'll give you the national statistics based on some of the reporting I've done. One out of every five is considered a problem gambler; and one out of 20 is considered a pathological gambler, where it has become a destructive force in their lives. They're stealing from family members, or facing foreclosure or they're losing their jobs.

And the criticism of casinos is - yeah - they post all this stuff, you know, if you have a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER. If you've been identified as an extreme pathological gambler, we've got you on this exclusion list. We're not going to let you in any casino, like they do in Atlantic City and in Pennsylvania.

But casinos track everything you do through a player card. They know how many times you're in their casino, what you play, what you like to play, what you eat - and they target their mailings through slots comps for you to entice you to go back and do the exact same activity that you're having a problem with controlling.

So it's almost a catch 22. They know there's people out there who have an issue, but the mailings and the promotions are geared to getting them back there, over and over again. You have several people in Pennsylvania who will tell you, you know, with the casinos now 15 or 20 minutes from their houses versus having to drive to Atlantic City, they're there three or four times a week.

Before, there was some sort of checks and balance where, you know, you got to make that hour and a half drive to Atlantic City. You don't have to do that anymore, Michel. It's right there in your backyard. It's become a big issue. The casino has come to you.

MARTIN: Suzette Parmley covers hotels and gaming for the Philadelphia Inquirer. She joined us from Philadelphia.

Suzette, thank you so much for speaking with us. This is really interesting.

PARMLEY: Oh, thank you. Thank you, Michel. It was my pleasure.

http://www.npr.org/2012/07/03/156192405/states-go-to-casinos-but-does-the-gamble-pay-off

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Patchak: What does it mean for Indian casinos?

[Click on the link to view the pdf]

From: Stop Predatory Gambling:

Shared by a supporter: "Note in this discussion the distinction between a tribe that is “under federal jurisdiction” and “federally recognized” – I hadn’t appreciated that distinction before. Also note the reference to the Mashpee Wampanoag seeking an administrative determination – presumably a determination that the tribe was “under federal jurisdiction” prior to 1934. I don’t see how that can be demonstrated."Best,

Les Bernal
Executive Director, Stop Predatory Gambling

100 Maryland Avenue NE, Room 310 | Washington, DC 20002
o: (202) 567-6996 | stoppredatorygambling.org






http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=ee31a2ca-eede-4341-9308-5790e9014348

Gaming Legal News - June 29 2012 • Volume 5, Number 16: The Gun Lake Decision: What Does It Mean For Indian Gaming?

By this time, everyone with an interest in gaming, is aware of last week’s U.S. Supreme Court decision rendered in the case of Match-EBe-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak. The Tribe is commonly known as the “Gun Lake Band” and will be so known for the purposes of this article.

Certainly every recipient of the Dickinson Wright Gaming Legal News is fully versed in the decision by virtue of our Gaming Law Group’s collaborative effort to quickly and comprehensively report the decision only a few days after it was rendered. See “Supreme Court Allows Challenge to Gun Lake Tribal Casino to Proceed Forward,” Gaming Legal News, Vol. 5, No. 14 (June 14, 2012). In addition, the decision has been widely reported in both print and internet outlets, so the basic elements are well-known and need not be repeated here.


That said, many readers still do not understand what the Court’s ruling means to Indian gaming and this article will attempt to identify – and respond to – the questions that may remain.








Julia tells how the pokies consumed her every thought.

Problem Gambling - Julia



Monday, July 2, 2012

Lottery: Preying on the Poor


At the same time Massachusetts Treasurer Steve Grossman is promoting sucking $$$ from the poor in another lottery scheme, others are revealing that the Emperor has no clothes.




Will Massachusetts pols notice?


Dallas NAACP wants to do away with the Texas Lottery
Published: 7/01/12



The NAACP branch in Dallas is taking on the Texas Lottery. The group wants to eliminate the lottery, because it preys on the poor.
Juanita Wallace, the president of the Dallas chapter claims there are many more lottery sales venues set up in poor areas of that city, than in middle- and upper-income neighborhoods.
"Research shows that there are more poor people that purchase these lottery tickets and scratch-offs than the people that can actually afford it: the middle and upper class," says Wallace.
The Texas Lottery Commission denies the claims, but does admit that the people most likely to play the popular “Pick Three” game earn less than $20,000 a year and that unemployed people are most likely to buy scratch off tickets.
The Baptist General Convention of Texas says it too, is pressing state officials to axe the lottery. Both groups claim the Texas lottery hasn't been the cash-cow for school funding that many people thought it would be.
 
 
http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/Dallas-NAACP-wants-to-do-away-with-the-Texas/L86Zk1rvREaRlk2nmkAyaw.cspx

Atlantic City Casinos Trivial Fines







July 2, 2012

Casinos fined for unshuffled cards, other breaches

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. — Two Atlantic City casinos were fined nearly $200,000 for violations including using unshuffled cards and not having enough security on hand, state casino regulators announced Monday.

Bally's Atlantic City was fined $105,000 for allowing people on the self-exclusion list to gamble, letting an underage patron gamble and not fully staffing required security positions.

The Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort was fined more than $91,000 for using unshuffled cards for 3½ hours in games of mini-baccarat.






The state also confiscated more than $4,000 won by self-excluded gamblers at the Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa.

Executives with Bally's and the Taj Mahal's parent companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday. But in documents submitted to the state Division of Gaming Enforcement, the companies admitted the violations and detailed corrective actions they had taken, including suspending or firing employees involved.

Bally's was hit with four of the five fines announced by the division, including a $70,000 penalty for violating its own security plans. In documents submitted to the state, Bally's acknowledged it had combined security locations and did not fully staff required security positions from Oct. 2010 through July 2011.



The casino said it had suspended a security director that oversaw staffing, gave verbal instructions to all security shift managers, and issued a memo that had to read and signed acknowledging that Bally's cannot make security staffing adjustments without state approval.

Bally's also was fined for allowing underage gamblers and allowing people who had placed themselves on New Jersey's self-exclusion list to gamble.

The largest fine, $91,236, was imposed on the Taj Mahal, which admitted that on Dec. 10, 2011, it failed to shuffle eight decks of cards before using them at a mini-baccarat game. The casino used the unshuffled cards for 3½ hours, and its surveillance department did not detect that the cards had not been shuffled.

The Taj Mahal fired nine employees involved, including the shift manager, three assistant managers and four dealers. The casino also has since installed a $2.2 million digital recording system which it says has greatly improved its surveillance capabilities, and the surveillance department has added eight officers.

The state also confiscated $4,350 that the Borgata seized from three gamblers it learned were on the self-exclusion list.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505245_162-57465106/casinos-fined-for-unshuffled-cards-other-breaches/


Thanks, Governor Slot Barns!




Well known for that old 'putting the cart before the horse' silliness, Beacon Hill was too busy meeting behind closed doors, crafting Predatory Gambling legislation while having their egos stroked by lobbyists to listen.

The moment is upon us and the consequences dire.

Who listened?  

Big Dig anyone?

About to impose serious consequences on surrounding south shore communities, there are no remedies, there is no attention.

Governor Slot Barns Patrick, too focused on elsewhere, knowing he would be out of office when the impacts destroyed communities, left a legacy of Sham.



Each proposed Slot Barn location bears massive infrastructure costs and much else. 

And there's that Ropes & Gray connection hovering and much else.

So much for false promises of ending the 'Big Dig culture' when it was illusion and the catastrophic reality will impact small communities.    







State Gaming Commission to meet in Lakeville about proposed East Taunton casino
By Gerry Tuoti
Posted Jul 02, 2012


Officials from surrounding communities will have a chance next week to voice their concerns to the state about the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe’s proposed casino in East Taunton, but they may not get much in the way of answers.

The State Gaming Commission will be on hand from 3 to 6 p.m. Thursday, July 12 at the Lakeville Council on Aging to gather input from southeastern Massachusetts towns. The meeting was scheduled at the request of state Rep. Keiko Orrall, R-Lakeville, whose district includes sections of Middleboro, Lakeville and Taunton.

“We clarified with her that we will not be able to give very much in terms of specifics,” Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby said during Monday’s weekly commission meeting, which was broadcast live on the commission’s website.

Crosby was out of town and participated in the meeting via conference call.

“It will be a listening opportunity for the Gaming Commission,” Orrall said when reached by phone after the meeting. “It’s a step in the process for helping them understand the issues the surrounding communities will be facing.”

Since the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe is pursuing a tribal gaming license under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, the state Gaming Commission’s involvement in the process is limited. The tribe is currently negotiating a gambling compact with Gov. Deval Patrick.

The Gaming Commission oversees commercial casino licensure, but says it is not privy to the confidential negotiations between the tribe and the governor.

“I think they (the commissioners) are trying to promote openness and transparency,” Orrall said. “We’re not getting that out of the governor’s office.”

The compact is expected to specify how to mitigate the casino’s regional impact on infrastructure and will outline how much tribal casino revenue will be collected by the state.





State and tribal officials haven’t publicly discussed specifics, but have said they are aware of the concerns some communities have expressed and plan to address them.

Under the state’s gambling law, up to one casino will be authorized in each of three regions of Massachusetts. The law includes a provision that gives a federally recognized American Indian tribe an exclusive window in which to pursue the casino for the southeastern Massachusetts region. If the state and the tribe are unable to reach a compact by July 31, however, commercial entities will be allowed to bid for the southeastern Massachusetts casino license.

“I know that the understanding was that surrounding towns would be included in the next step,” Orrall said. “It doesn’t feel like we’re being heard.”

She said she’s encouraged the Gaming Commission has scheduled the meeting.

“It’s a step of helping people understand the process and the role the Gaming Commission has in this,” Orrall said. “I think we need to hear what their perspective is. I think it’s important to establish a dialogue. It’s important for them to understand the Gaming Commission is trying to work with surrounding communities.”

Contact Gerry Tuoti at gtuoti@tauntongazette.com.


Read more: http://www.tauntongazette.com/news/x1446669472/State-Gaming-Commission-to-meet-in-Lakeville-about-proposed-East-Taunton-casino#ixzz1zVcfKzP5

Singapore: Protecting its citizens




Read the attached from The WSJ.... http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2012/07/02/singapore-casino-controls-may-fuel-other-bets-experts-say/

The most glaring fact:

"Authorities have responded to reports of problem gambling with more safeguards, including plans announced last month to ban 15,000 more people, mainly the poor and unemployed, from the two casinos— Genting Singapore PLC’s Resorts World Sentosa and Las Vegas Sands Corp.’s Marina Bay Sands. That ban adds to the 28,000 people already barred on government orders, including people who are bankrupt and people receiving long-term government financial aid."

That's 43,000 people are being kept out of the country's two casinos because of their predatory business practices, one of which is owned by Genting.

Best,


Les Bernal
Executive Director, Stop Predatory Gambling

100 Maryland Avenue NE, Room 310 | Washington, DC 20002
o: (202) 567-6996 | stoppredatorygambling.org




THE WALL STREET HOURNAL | SOUTHEAST ASIA

  • July 2, 2012, 7:27 PM

  • Singapore Casino Controls May Fuel Other Bets, Experts Say


    By Chun Han Wong

    SINGAPORE – Since betting big on casino gambling two years ago, Singapore has taken a tough line on locals seeking to make a quick buck at its gaming centers, including restricting access for some residents. But while its stringent methods have helped keep casino-related excesses under control, some observers fear the regulations might be fueling other gambling ills beyond the city-state’s glitzy integrated resorts.

    Singapore’s two casinos—intended to help draw tourists and create jobs in the local service sector—have certainly given a shot of adrenaline to the city-state’s increasingly vibrant social scene, lifting tourist arrivals to a record last year. But a number of psychiatrists and counselors fear that policymakers may be focusing too much on the casinos when it comes to tackling gambling addiction.

    “The casinos have taken more than the necessary attention from other gambling activities,” said Thomas Lee, a gambling counselor at The Resilienz Mind clinic. “We’ve hardly heard (from the government) about the lotteries or horse racing, for example.”

    After lifting a longstanding casino ban in 2005 against fervent public opposition, the Singapore government has introduced a raft of measures to tackle casino-gambling addiction, including voluntary and mandatory entry bans, entry levies for citizens and permanent residents, bans on casino advertising that targets locals, and social programs discouraging heavy gambling.

    But “what about other forms of gambling?” said Dr. Lee, who is also a former chief of the Addiction Medicine Department at Singapore’s Institute of Mental Health. “The government has been too focused on tackling casino gambling.”

    An official survey on gambling habits, published in February, found in 2011 that lotteries were the most popular games among Singapore citizens and permanent residents ages 18 and above. Some 38% of locals had played “4D”—a game that involves guessing the winning four-digit combinations in weekly draws—within 12 months of the survey. About 28% gamble on “TOTO,” a weekly game in which players pick six numbers from one to 45. In contrast, table games at Singapore’s two casinos draw just 4% of locals, while jackpot machines on those premises attract just 3%.

    The survey suggested that government social safeguards have had some effect in controlling gambling, albeit with mixed results. The overall gambling rate among locals eased to 47% in 2011 from 54% in 2008. But the data also pointed to more low-income players betting large sums and frequent gamblers playing more often.

    Efforts to obtain official comment on whether the government is dedicating enough energy to minimizing problem gambling in lotteries and other non-casino games were not immediately successful. All legal non-casino gambling activities in the city-state are managed by the Singapore Totalisator Board, a statutory body that is the only organization here with legal rights to run lotteries, sports betting and horse-racing operations. Proceeds are steered into community development projects; the board’s website says it works to ensure the betting operations it oversees “are conducted with honesty and integrity.”

    Authorities have responded to reports of problem gambling with more safeguards, including plans announced last month to ban 15,000 more people, mainly the poor and unemployed, from the two casinos— Genting Singapore PLC’s Resorts World Sentosa and Las Vegas Sands Corp.’s Marina Bay Sands. That ban adds to the 28,000 people already barred on government orders, including people who are bankrupt and people receiving long-term government financial aid.

    “The government’s intention was to protect vulnerable Singaporeans from the worst effects of the casinos, and to this end they have succeeded to a large extent,” said Munidasa Winslow, a psychiatrist and executive director at mental-health consultancy Promises. “We do have a gambling problem in many forms, but they are mainly looking at it at the casino leveI—I guess that’s because the casinos are the fastest way that someone can go from normality to being out of control.”

    Nonetheless, authorities should step up measures against other forms of gambling such as illegal sports betting and internet gambling, the psychiatrist said. “My own suspicions are that the vast majority of the people who are vulnerable—like the poor and the elderly—are spending more of their money on TOTO and 4D and other games.”

    One area of growing concern is internet gambling, which can throw up significant policy-making challenges given the difficulty of detecting and policing such activity, said Sally Gainsbury, a research fellow at Australia’s Southern Cross University. A recent report by U.K.-based Global Betting and Gaming Consultants showed that Singapore residents lost $357.2 million to online gambling websites in 2011, up from $312.5 million in 2010 and $271.5 million in 2009.

    Authorities have indicated recently that they are aware of at least some new gambling trends that could pose challenges for the city-state. In February, the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports flagged internet gambling as an “emerging concern,” but conceded that the problem was difficult to tackle given the private nature of the activity, and the high internet usage by the city-state’s technologically savvy population.


    http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2012/07/02/singapore-casino-controls-may-fuel-other-bets-experts-say/


    NOTE: GENTING is the financial backer of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe in Massachusetts.

    Singapore has been proactive in protecting its citizens because it doesn't want the CRIME and FAMILY DESTRUCTION caused by Predatory Gambling -- Dangerous Games

    Loveman bullish to create more Gambling Addicts in Boston



    Caesars’ CEO is bullish on Suffolk bid

    Globe Staff / July 2, 2012
     
    Caesars Entertainment’s chief executive Gary Loveman glibly defends his business as a service industry for risk-takers who want to place “a modest bit of consideration” on an uncertain outcome.
    That was what the gambling giant did at Suffolk Downs, when it partnered in 2011 with a Depression-era racetrack that was well positioned to pursue casino development rights.

    A year later, Loveman likes his prospects: He boldly says he foresees no other competitors for the Greater Boston casino license, likely to be the most lucrative license in the emerging Massachusetts gambling market.

    “I think it’s unlikely [another bidder will surface] because the cost of now mounting a bid is substantial,” said Loveman, in his first extensive interview since plans for a $1 billion Suffolk Downs casino were released last month.

    It is exactly the kind of audacious public prediction the cautious local management at Suffolk Downs would never make.

    But Loveman, 52, a former Harvard Business School professor, boasts about being data-driven. And the data, as he sees it, suggest that no other developers are planning to get into the game.

    “There’s lots of ways you’d hear about it,” Loveman said. “People hire lobbyists. They’re shopping for real estate. They’re looking for financing. There are so many things you have to do. This is not something for the faint-hearted. You have to be in to do this in a big way. You’re going to spend tens of millions of dollars to present something to the gaming commission and it’s hard to do that quietly.”

    The blunt-speaking chief executive dismissed the casino aspirations of developer David Nunes, who has proposed a $700 million gambling resort in Milford but has yet to announce a financing partner. “We hear Mr. Nunes’s remarks, but I don’t think it’s likely that is going to be successful,” said Loveman.
    Nunes fired back: “Ridiculous prognostications by CEOs with $20 billion debt problems are not things that I have to worry about.”
    It was an easy shot at Loveman’s Achilles heel. His debt-heavy company is hustling to open new streams of revenue before a large chunk of the $20 billion it owes comes due in 2015.

    Michael Paladino, a casino analyst for Fitch Ratings, said the trajectory of the company’s business over the next several years will determine “whether or not they can refinance at reasonable terms.” Fitch maintains a CCC rating on Caesars, which indicates that the company has substantial credit risk.



    Caesars is a big name in the industry, but one of the smaller partners in Suffolk Downs. It holds a 4.2 percent stake in the project, according to paperwork filed with state racing authorities. Richard Fields, a former Donald Trump associate, holds about 41 percent of the venture. Joseph O’Donnell, founder of Boston Culinary Group, holds about 31 percent. A New York property investment company, Vornado Realty Trust, has 19.9 percent. Several others hold minuscule shares.


    Richard Fields only claim to fame seems to be 'charitable contributions' to purchase the devotion of Mayor Menino and Senator Petrucelli, not $$$$.


     Because if you’re waiting for Richard Fields to come up with a billion dollars from a cash-challenged track, you might want to pass the time by making an appointment to see Mr. Godot. Caesars is showing that it could raise the money, if it needs to, while Fields’ inability to swing even a bargain-price purchase of Trump Marina means the jury’s still out on his rainmaking abilities.
    http://dmckee.lvablog.com/?p=9103

    The arrangement is a new development model for Caesars, which is joining casino projects as a minority partner, while arranging to collect fees to manage the properties. The company opened a new casino in Cleveland in May under its Horseshoe brand. Caesars owns 20 percent of that project.
    “It’s not as lucrative” as owning a casino outright “but nor is it as expensive,” said Loveman, who oversees more than 50 gambling properties.

    Though Caesars holds a small stake in Suffolk Downs, Loveman said his team was intimately involved in the design of the gambling resort proposal. The partners are still discussing a name for the resort, but Loveman wants “Caesars” in the title.

    Paladino said Caesars likes the fee-for-management business because it is an efficient use of capital.

    “They also just have limited financial flexibility to invest the capital if they did want to own it outright,” he said.

    Caesars’ debt is from a leveraged buyout of the company in 2008, just as the recession took hold and gambling revenues plummeted, experts say.
    Loveman said his company is “mindful of the maturities in the debt. . . . We work on this issue, we certainly think about it and deliberate on it all the time. And I am quite confident we will address it successfully.”

    The Suffolk Downs partners will seek project financing to help pay for the East Boston development.

    The resort will not be financed off Caesars’ balance sheet. “This is not a case where the company is going to be required to write a billion-dollar check to build this facility,” said Loveman.
    Loveman’s unlikely rise to the top of his business is Las Vegas legend. The story begins in 1998, when the boss of the national mid-market casino chain Harrah’s Entertainment had the crazy idea to hire a Harvard egghead to revitalize the business. Professor Loveman took a sabbatical, and came to Harrah’s with a bunch of business school theories about the power of branding to influence consumers, but no experience running a gambling hall.

    Many expected disaster, but Loveman pioneered new ways to exploit customer data to grow revenue, and five years later he ascended to chief executive.
    “He made them the most technologically sophisticated casino company and helped them build the largest customer database,” said Dennis Forst, casino industry analyst for KeyBanc Capital Markets.


    Loveman's brilliance determined that 90% of Harrah's profits originated from 10% of their patrons, targeted, marketed and comp'd those Gambling Addicts. Yes! A true genius at exploiting the vulnerability of those least able to afford it.


    Since becoming chief executive, Loveman has expanded the kingdom. Harrah’s gobbled up Caesars in 2005, giving the chain some marquee properties, including iconic Caesars Palace on the Las Vegas Strip, the theme resort where daredevil Evel Knievel famously crashed his motorcycle trying to jump the hotel fountains. Harrah’s changed its name to Caesars Entertainment in 2010.

    At Suffolk Downs, Loveman proposes a two-phase construction. In the first phase, taking about one year, “You’d see casino, slots and tables, the usual casino services, and some restaurant services,” he said. “And then you’d get the hotel, spa, more restaurants, and retail in the second phase.” He said the second phase would take an additional year.

    For all his talk, Loveman keeps a much lower profile than neighboring CEOs on the Las Vegas Strip, such as Steve Wynn, the showman who trades Picasso masterpieces like baseball cards. Or Sheldon Adelson, the Boston-born billionaire who bankrolled Newt Gingrich’s run for the Republican presidential nomination and is reportedly spending millions to put Mitt Romney in office.

    Loveman is known for his striking deep voice, expansive vocabulary, and elegant diction. Most Bostonians complain about their commute; few travel as far as Loveman, who never left the Boston area after taking his casino job. His main office is at the company’s flagship resort in Las Vegas.

    When working he lives at the hotel or on the road; he comes home on weekends.

    “My wife is a Bostonian who doesn’t want to live anywhere else, so that’s just the way we’ve continued,” said Loveman.

    His local connections are a big part of the reason O’Donnell, who knew Loveman through Harvard, turned to him when Suffolk Downs needed a partner with casino expertise. In a parochial city, people already knew Loveman. O’Donnell also liked Loveman’s intelligence and his clean record, with no character blots or tabloid scandals to defend or explain away.

    “I’m very, very comfortable with Gary,” said O’Donnell, in an interview.

    Loveman said he is thrilled to be doing a deal with his old friend. “It’s a joy for me to try to have a business in my home state and a city that I feel very close to,” he said.

    One of Loveman’s longtime foes suggests Suffolk Downs symbolically means even more to the casino boss.
    “He has always wanted Boston to legitimize himself,” said Tom Grey, a former Illinois preacher dubbed the Riverboat Rambo for his 20-year campaign against a business he describes as predatory.

    If Loveman can bring a casino to Boston, a city with national cultural significance and which does not need gambling, Grey said, “he thinks that would legitimize the industry as a product.”
    “In his mind,” said Grey, “Boston is the big enchilada.”

    Mark Arsenault can be reached at marsenault@globe.com.


    http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/07/02/caesars_ceo_boldly_foresees_no_competition_for_greater_boston_casino_license/

    SouthCoast seeks deadline for federal action on tribal casino





    SouthCoast seeks deadline for federal action on tribal casino

    Ban on smoking a test for Mass. casinos



    When the over-stated revenue projections fail to materialize, the Gambling Industry will already have an excuse.

    And Clyde can return to counting license plates.

    Ban on smoking a test for Mass. casinos

    Bay State law could affect their ability to compete


    It is an old saw in the gambling industry that antismoking policies hurt revenue by driving away a casino’s best customers.

    With Massachusetts preparing to open smoke-free gambling resorts, the industry’s conventional wisdom will be put to the test. The local casinos will have to compete with established facilities in Rhode Island and Connecticut that permit gamblers to light up.

    “It will be an interesting experiment to see whether people will drive an extra two hours to smoke,” said Kevin DeSanctis, chief executive of Revel Entertainment Group, the company that owns the elaborate new Revel Atlantic City, one of the most prominent smoke-free casinos in America. It opened in April.

    Casinos are among the last indoor refuges for smokers, though pressure from ­casino employees and public health groups is slowly driving smoking bans and partial bans onto the gambling floor.
    Though only about 20 percent of adults in the country smoke, “the conventional wisdom in the industry is that smoking is good for business and they have consistently opposed smoking bans,” said Clyde Barrow, a casino specialist at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. The industry generally believes “that smokers gamble more,” though the belief is not backed up with much scientific research.

    In setting their smoking policy, Revel executives concluded that going smoke-free fit best with long-term plans to maximize nongambling revenue at the resort.

    “We felt that you couldn’t do it halfway,” said DeSanctis, in an interview. “We decided to make it smoke-free and give ourselves the opportunity to learn whether this is problematic for folks who not only like to gamble but also like to smoke.”

    So far, the jury is out.

    “I have not received one negative comment on being smoke-free,” said DeSanctis. “I’ve received a lot of positive comments. I think it’s the way of the future.”

    However, Revel’s gambling revenues have been lower than expected.

    “People say [the no-smoking policy] has to be a contributing factor, and it may be, but I don’t know to what extent,” said ­DeSanctis. “On a long-term ­basis we believe it will work to our benefit, but it is way too early to tell.”

    Stephanie Steinberg, founder of Smoke-Free Gaming, a Colorado-based advocacy group for casino patrons and employees, contends that smoking bans are good for a casino’s bottom line over the long term.

    “We calculated that smokers die 14 years sooner than nonsmokers,” she said. “That’s 14 years of lost revenue for a casino.”

    In writing the Massachusetts casino law, state legislators thought seriously about the ­effects of smoking policies on gambling revenue, said state Senator Stanley Rosenberg, an Amherst Democrat and an ­architect of the 2011 state law that legalized casino gambling. The law bans smoking in Bay State casinos.

    “In making that decision [to prohibit smoking], you understand that you are affecting the economics of the facility,” Rosenberg said. Some revenue may be lost to out-of-state casinos that permit smoking. “That said, successful facilities don’t need smoking to succeed.”


    Beacon Hill spent more time discussing the smoking ban than the consequences of FREE ALCOHOL.




    The Connecticut tribal casinos, Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun, offer smoking and nonsmoking gambling areas. Twin River slot parlor in Rhode ­Island, which is seeking to ­expand with table games, has 121,250 square feet of casino floor space for smoking and 36,850 square feet for nonsmokers, according to a spokeswoman for the facility.

    Barrow said the perception that smoking bans reduce revenue may be mistaken, and that casino operators may be at fault. Casino operators often fill their nonsmoking rooms with older and less interesting slot machines and lower-stakes ­table games, under the assumption that the more enticing ­offerings should be available for smokers, he said.

    “In a sense, they create the reality that the nonsmoking ­area creates less revenue per customer by the way they structure the areas,” said Barrow.

    He suggested that the casino industry’s view on smoking is backwards, and that a smoking ban could enhance business, ­especially in New England where smoking rates are generally below the national average.

    “You have three-quarters of gamblers who are nonsmokers,” he said. “And given the ­option, they’re going to avoid being in smoke and then making a trip to the dry cleaner. I think you have the opportunity to pull people out of Rhode ­Island and Connecticut, especially if they’re equidistant.”

    “Massachusetts is going to be an interesting test case to see whether this is a competitive advantage,” said Barrow. “I think it will be.”


    http://bostonglobe.com/metro/2012/06/30/smoking-ban-massachusetts-casinos-will-test-conventional-wisdom/SXmJP5LL14RAdf6sTF9v5K/story.html

    Sunday, July 1, 2012

    Tribe's link to Taunton essential to casino deal









    Tribe's link to Taunton essential to casino deal
     
    The Old Colony Historical Society's collection includes copper and wampum beads used by tribe members for trading and for self-adornment.Cape Cod Times/Jim Preston



    gbrennan@capecodonline.com

    July 01, 2012

    TAUNTON — Hostilities between English settlers and Native Americans came to a head in this city that now, 331 years later, is welcoming a tribal casino within its borders.

    In 1671, commissioners of the Massachusetts Bay Colony invited Metacomet, also known as King Philip, the son of Massasoit and then leader of Wampanoag Nation, to Taunton for a meeting with English settlers, according to S.H. Emery's "History of Taunton Massachusetts: 1637-1893."
     
    "Philip was willing to proceed to Taunton Green, then called the Training Field, if hostages were left. Williams and John Brown consented to remain," Emery wrote.
     
    Inside an old meetinghouse, colonists stood on one side in "formal garbs, close shorn hair and solemn countenances," Emery wrote. On the other side "appeared the tawny and ferocious countenances of Indian warriors; their long, black hair hanging down their backs; their small sunken eyes, gleaming with serpent fires ..."
     
    Philip was confronted about reports he was planning an attack on Taunton and other settlements. "He was covered with confusion and in his panic acknowledged the truth of all their charges," Emery wrote.
     
    Philip surrendered his weapons, which included guns, and "signed his submission," but in the next four years continued to stockpile weapons for a battle that history now refers to as King Philip's War.
    That history could prove important because to win federal approval of its proposed $500 million casino project in Taunton, the Mashpee Wampanoag must prove to the Bureau of Indian Affairs it has historic and cultural ties to Taunton.
     
    The tribe is asking the federal government to take 146 acres in the Liberty and Union Industrial Park into federal trust, along with 170 acres in Mashpee, for the tribe's initial reservation.

    Environmental review

    The federal bureau started an environmental review of the land two weeks ago that is expected to take several months. Meanwhile, the tribe is negotiating a compact with Gov. Deval Patrick for payments in lieu of taxes. An announcement could come as early as this week as the tribe races to meet a July 31 deadline imposed by the state law that authorizes three casinos and a single slot parlor. The tribe's land into trust application does not have to be completed by that date.
     
    In a May decision that demonstrates the importance of the historical ties, the bureau rejected the trust application of the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians in California because it did not "demonstrate it had a significant historic connection to the site."
     
    Making the link between Indians and Taunton is as easy as walking into the Old Colony Historical Society in the city, where volumes of books and records are preserved.
     
    But making the connection between the Mashpee Wampanoag and the territory is not as clear, said William Hanna, a retired Taunton High School teacher and historian who authored "A History of Taunton, Massachusetts" in 2008.
     
    Hanna spent hours sifting through records at the historic society where he says there is no reference in official records to specific Wampanoag tribes.
     
    "Never, ever have I seen a distinction between the Mashpee Wampanoag, Aquinnah Wampanoag or other Wampanoag tribes," he said. "To say that the Mashpee Wampanoag have a historic tie to Taunton, nothing I see proves that."
     
    Of course, nothing disproves it either, he said.
     
    In his book, "The Wampanoag Indian Federation: Indian Neighbors to the Pilgrims," Milton A. Travers wrote about a Cohannet Wampanoag Tribe, which "occupied the territory including parts of the present towns of Berkley, Mansfield, Norton and Raynham, and also a portion within the present city limits of Taunton, Massachusetts."
     
    The Cohannet are not among a list of state- and federally recognized tribes still in existence.
    The Mashpee Wampanoag declined a request by the Times to release the documentation it presented as part of its application to the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs and instead issued a statement.

    "There are strong ties to the region with excellent documentary support," tribal council Chairman Cedric Cromwell said. "Federal and state agencies acknowledge Mashpee connections to the archaeological record in the Taunton region. The preponderance of scholars who have written on the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe sees our influence historically as extending into the Taunton area, and there is linguistic support for that argument, as well. Beyond this written evidence, we know of this connection through our oral history, passed down from generation to generation."

    false claims?

    Other Massachusetts tribes unhappy about the tribe's federal status are already attempting to poke holes in their historical data.
     
    At a bureau hearing in Taunton last week, representatives of the Pocasset Wampanoag and the Massachusett tribe both testified the Mashpee have no historic links to Taunton.
     
    Pocasset leader George Buffalo Spring rejected the Mashpee tribe's claims to Taunton land. "The Mashpee leadership disrespects our Pokanoket ancestors and our lands by improperly making false claims to reservation shop in Pocasset Pokanoket territories," he said.
     
    But representatives of the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), the only other federally recognized tribe in Massachusetts, defended the Mashpee application, saying all of the Wampanoag Nation has ties to Southeastern Massachusetts.
     
    Officials at the Robbins Museum in Middleboro, which is operated by the Massachusetts Archaeological Society and has an extensive collection of Wampanoag artifacts from the region, were reluctant to comment on the dispute except to say the region was a hotbed of Indian activity.
     
    The Times requested the tribe's application and supporting documents in a Freedom of Information Act filing with the bureau. Thus far, the bureau has only released documents filed five years ago in support of taking 539 acres into trust in Middleboro, a proposal no longer on the table.
     
    But as they did in Middleboro, tribe historians will likely point to the arrival of the Pilgrims and the "profound and enduring changes" that resulted in the past 400 years. According to the historical report drafted by Christine Grabowski for that 2007 application, "the contemporary Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe descends from a band of Indians that was part of the historic Pokanoket nation."
     
    Pokanoket nation comprised a group of "allied sachemships," numbering more than 30, under the leadership of one Massasoit or supreme sachem, who when the Pilgrims landed was Ousamequin.
     
    The various bands moved around to temporary settlements on a seasonal basis "rather than specific fixed land-holdings in the European fashion," Grabowski wrote.

    PECK OF BEANS, JACKKNIFE

    In his book "Mayflower," Nathaniel Philbrick writes it was a raid led by Miles Standish in 1623 on the Massachusett tribe and Massasoit's decision to befriend the Pilgrims that led to what is now referred to as the Wampanoag Nation.
     
    Massasoit's hold on the region came as a result of the deaths of some influential Cape sachems, Philbrick wrote. "Over the next few years, Massasoit established the Indian nation we now refer to as the Wampanoag — an entity that may not even have existed before this crucial watershed."
     
    Like the Indians before them, colonists were drawn to the region — known as Titicut and Cohannet — by the herring-rich Taunton River.
     
    Elizabeth Pole, according to historical accounts, purchased land in 1637 for a "peck of beans and a jackknife," moving from Dorchester to Taunton where there was more room for flocks and herds.
     
    Though there is no official record, the Pole legend is depicted on the city's seal.
     
    The following year, 46 settlers purchased land in a deed that bears King Philip's name, and Taunton was incorporated.
     
    In the years that followed, Massasoit-controlled Indians and the settlers lived a mostly peaceful existence, though by 1657 Massasoit's sons became increasingly troubled by the invasion of colonists into their territories.
     
    "Just a few months later, (Massasoit's son Wamsutta) refused to part with a portion of the land his father had agreed to sell" to Taunton, Philbrick wrote.

    Philip also did not see things the way his father did. In the years that followed that 1671 showdown with the colonists in Taunton, Philip continued to plot his attack, Emery wrote.
     
    It is the murder of Indian John Sassamon in 1675 that triggered the start of King Philip's War — a bloody conflict that decimated the native population.
     
     
     
    Taunton figured prominently in that war. On June 24, 1675, "Edward Babbitt of Taunton was killed by an Indian of Philip's band," Emery wrote.
     
    A few days later, it was Taunton that was designated as a rendezvous point for colonists where they gathered under the command of Maj. William Bradford of Plymouth, according to Emery's book.
     
    Philip was chased for a little more than a year in a far-ranging war. In the final days of the conflict, on July 31, 1676, Capt. Benjamin Church learned King Philip was about to cross the Taunton River with a view of attacking the towns of Taunton and Bridgewater, Emery wrote. The next day Church saw Philip on the banks of the river and fired at him, but he escaped.
     
    On Aug. 6, 1676, with the help of an Indian informant, 26 Indians were captured in what is now Norton, Emery wrote.
     
    The war ended that month with the killing of King Philip at Mount Hope in Rhode Island.
     
    All the while, the Mashpee Wampanoag remained on Cape Cod, staying out of the conflict on land set aside for the tribe by Richard Bourne, a Sandwich selectman.

    Tribes join

    After the war, the Mashpee Wampanoag "absorbed the Coatuits, Satuits, Paupausits, Wakoquits, Ashimits and Weesquob tribes," Travers wrote.
     
    Mashpee opponents, like the Pocasset and Massachusett tribes, will argue that's evidence Taunton and other areas of Southeastern Massachusetts north of the Cape Cod Canal are outside the Mashpee Wampanoag territory.
     
    James Lynch, an ethno-historian hired by Pocassets and towns like Halifax to counter the Mashpee Wampanoag claims, has written the Mashpee can't make the historic and cultural claims necessary because they don't exist.
     
    "The eminent historian Bernard Lewis once remarked that there are three kinds of history, recovered, remembered and invented," Lynch wrote. "Mashpee's claims to Taunton are of the third sort."
     
    The Mashpee will likely counter they were part of one nation under Massasoit and they, like the Aquinnah, are the tribes that survived and continued to govern as a tribe throughout their history.
    Unlike King Philip's War, it is a battle likely to play out in a courtroom.