It doesn't matter what state. People lose their voice when the Gambling Industry moves in.
Massachusetts says it all!
Maine casino future in doubt after permit ruling
July 23, 2012
PORTLAND, Maine — The immediate future of Maine's newest casino is in
doubt.
Department of Environmental Protection officials and the Attorney
General's Office were meeting Monday and discussing what course of action to
take after a judge nullified a development permit for the Oxford Casino less
than two months after the casino opened in the western Maine town of
Oxford.
In a 10-page decision, Justice Michaela Murphy agreed with the
Androscoggin River Alliance, which argued the DEP wrongly granted the permit
last year after considering just the first phase of the three-phase project.
Murphy ordered that the permit application be sent back to the DEP for further
consideration.
Attorney Stephen Hinchman, who represents the alliance,
said Murphy's decision vacates the casino owner's development permit. Without a
permit, the casino — which opened June 5 — isn't licensed to operate and must
close, he said.
"They went forward at their own risk and now they're
going to have to pay the price," Hinchman told The Associated Press. "It was a
gamble. It was a bad gamble."
David Van Slyke, an attorney representing
casino owner BB Development LLC, disagreed that the casino has to shut down. The
ruling, he said, deals only with the technical aspects of one permit.
He
told the Sun Journal of Lewiston, which first reported the court ruling on
Monday, that he and his client were evaluating Murphy's ruling.
"We
disagree with the decision both legally and factually and, obviously, we're
still evaluating it at this time," he said.
Maine voters approved the
casino in a statewide vote in November 2010. In March 2011, the DEP approved BB
Development's application for the first phase of the casino project. The
following month, the Androscoggin River Alliance and a group of 18 year-round
and seasonal residents appealed the decision to the Board of Environmental
Protection, arguing that the DEP did not consider all three phases of the
development as required by law in granting the permit for the first phase.
After the BEP denied the appeal, the alliance last August filed a lawsuit
challenging the decision.
Murphy's decision was signed last Wednesday and
delivered to parties in the suit over the weekend.
Hinchman said the
casino's location, on top of a hill, doesn't have adequate sewage facilities to
handle any expanded development and jeopardizes groundwater supplies and
surrounding ponds and streams.
"We've always said this was the wrong
place for a development of this magnitude. It didn't matter if it was a
hospital, a church, a school or a casino, this is the wrong place for
development," he said. "Because the department and the board never looked at the
impact of full build-out, they never answered the question of can this site
sustain the level of sewage disposal when the project tripled at full
build-out."
DEP Commissioner Patricia Aho was meeting Monday morning with
staff from the Attorney's General Office to determine what Murphy's ruling means
and what the next steps might be, said DEP spokeswoman Samantha
DePoy-Warren.
Patrick Fleming, executive director of the Maine Gambling
Control Board, said the board will probably follow the lead of the DEP.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505245_162-57477879/maine-casino-future-in-doubt-after-permit-ruling/?tag=socsh
Joe Soto and the Chicago Casino
5 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment