A new report on gambling behavior and
attitudes finds that New England residents are gambling closer to home and
gambling less.
The report, "Bring It On
Home, An Overview of Gaming Behavior in New England," by Clyde Barrow
of the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, found that, between 2006 and 2012,
the percentage of New England residents visiting a casino has dropped from 30 to
23 percent. The only exception to this decline was among Mainers, where casino
gambling increased from 9 to 21 percent of residents. Casino gambling among
Mainers increased largely as a result of the opening of the Oxford casino last
year. The study also found that the remaining fraction of New Englanders who do
so are visiting casinos closer to where they live.
Big picture for New Hampshire: casino
gambling is in decline because the novelty effect of casinos has worn off and
the New England casino market has become nearly saturated. Once the four
Massachusetts casinos are built, New Hampshire will be surrounded by fifteen
casinos.
Big
Issue: Convenience Versus Destination Casino
Whether a Salem casino would
be economically advantageous for New Hampshire hinges critically on whether it
would attract out-of-state gamblers in large numbers. As you can see from the
Barrow charts below, nearly 75 percent of visitors to Foxwoods, a Connecticut
destination casino, live more than one hour distant. In contrast, 90 percent of
visitors to Twin River in Rhode Island, a convenience or local market
casino, live within one hour drive time.
Take home: nearly 70 percent
of Twin River gamblers live within a 30 minute drive time.
The Twin River casino is highly
similar to the casino proposed for Salem by Las-Vegas based Millennium Gaming.
Twin River has 4,751 slot machines, electronic table games, restaurants and
bars, a comedy club, and a 2,000 seat entertainment arena. Millennium is
proposing 5,000 slots, table games, restaurants, and entertainment for
Salem.
Salem
Casino Is Anti Small Business
Like Twin River, a Salem casino would
be a convenience or local market casino, with most gamblers living within a 30
minute drive time, with only a fraction of its revenues beyond that proximity
zone.
Convenience casinos create no new
wealth, skills, or incomes among residents within their market area. Ergo,
consumer dollars lost at a Salem convenience casino are displaced or
cannibalized from thousands of existing local restaurants, hotels, conference
centers, and entertainment venues.
Same with casino jobs, which are
cannibalized from our local business community.
Once facility construction is
complete and construction jobs are gone, Salem casino revenues and jobs will be
largely offset by declines in jobs and revenues on Concord's Main Street,
Manchester's Elm Street and Verizon Center, Portsmouth's Music Hall, and
thousands of local businesses within the 30 minute drive time. Rather than being
recycled back into the local economy and generating favorable multiplier
effects, a Salem casino's purchases and profits will bleed out of New Hampshire
to its Las Vegas owners.
Take home: a Salem casino is an
economic black hole.
# #
#
No comments:
Post a Comment