June 14, 2012
Gambling glitch
The gambling conglomerate bankrolling the efforts to build a tribal casino in
Taunton has become embroiled in an apparent pay-to-play scandal in New York, a
fact that sheds new light on the different legal regimes Massachusetts’s new
gaming law places on tribal and commercial casino operators. Because the firm at
the center of the New York scandal, Genting, is partnering with the Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe, the state’s gaming commission currently has no power to scrub
its business integrity -- a powerful anti-corruption check the gaming commission
holds over commercial firms bidding for state gaming licenses.
The Malaysian gambling giant Genting joined forces with the Mashpee in late
2009, after the tribe’s attempt to construct a casino in Middleborough
unraveled. It is common for commercial investors to partner with Native American
tribes pursuing casino gaming, since gaining local, state, and federal approvals
can be a long, expensive undertaking. Tribes essentially trade a slug of startup
capital for a cut of future casino revenues. And Genting, which sits on top of a
reported $5 billion cash stockpile, has plenty of capital to lend.
According to a recent
Boston magazine
story
, the Mashpee have borrowed close to $17 million while chasing federal
recognition and casino gaming rights.
Boston
reported Genting is collecting more than 16 percent interest on its
investment in the Mashpee. (The tribe doesn’t comment publicly on its finances.)
The Mashpee also
poured
$300,000 of Genting’s money into a recent nonbinding referendum that
endorsed
the tribe’s proposed Taunton casino. Since late 2010, Genting has also spent
over $1.8 million lobbying in support of its gaming interests in Florida and New
York.
That hefty lobbying bill is fully disclosed, but it doesn’t capture the full
extent of Genting’s attempts to shape gambling policy across the border in New
York.
The New York Times recently
reported
that a New York gambling advocacy group founded by Genting pumped $2 million
into a nonprofit coalition of business and labor groups that lobbies
aggressively in Albany and has close ties to Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Genting kicked
an additional $400,000 of its own funds into the nonprofit, a 501(c)4 that
doesn’t have to disclose its donors publicly.
[This is no different from Mayor Tom Menino and Senator Petrucelli have 'charities' that accomplish the same purpose.]
At the same time that business-labor coalition group was quietly taking
Genting’s money, spending it on television advertisements praising the governor,
Cuomo was pushing a $4 billion casino plan that would directly benefit Genting.
Genting currently operates a video slot machine complex at the Aqueduct
racetrack in Queens, but it was campaigning for a state constitutional amendment
that would allow it to build a full-blown casino. Company officials
pitched
their casino agenda to Cuomo at a fundraiser late last year; months later, the
governor put his shoulder into a drive to construct a $4 billion convention
center and casino at Genting’s Queens track. That plan collapsed days before the
Times uncovered Genting’s undisclosed
financing of Cuomo’s nonprofit. Genting has denied any wrongdoing in New York,
and Cuomo has said that the company’s gambling money was not linked to his
casino advocacy on its behalf.
In the eyes of the law that governs casino gambling in Massachusetts, the
difference between a dirty nose and an outright pay-to-play scandal doesn’t
matter -- at least as far as tribal gaming goes. As a check on casino
corruption, the state’s
new
gaming law gives the Massachusetts Gaming Commission the power to test the
“integrity, honesty, good character and reputation” of applicants seeking gaming
licenses. The commission has the power to deny a license to any casino applicant
that fails to “demonstrate responsible business practices,” or that the
commission feels would be “injurious to the interests of the Commonwealth.”
However, that test only applies to commercial gaming applicants. The new
gaming law doesn’t just give the state’s tribes an exclusive window to establish
a gambling foothold in one of the state’s three casino regions. It also exempts
the tribes from many of the hurdles commercial gaming applicants face, including
the test of an investor’s character and reputation. The role of the state gaming
commission in regulating and overseeing tribal gaming is subject to ongoing,
confidential compact negotiations between the governor and the Mashpee. A
spokeswoman for the state gaming commission said the group “would welcome all
measures” to ensure “ethics and integrity,” although it was not immediately
clear whether the commission has actually asked for such measures in compact
negotiations.
In a statement, Mashpee tribal chairman drew a sharp line between the tribe
and its financial partner, saying, “The entity proposing gaming in Taunton is
the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, period. The company helping us with financing and
development was chosen because they have the skill, management expertise, and
knowhow necessary to run a first class destination resort casino. In addition,
they have the financial resources to ensure that our Tribe will be successful in
fulfilling our vision in Taunton and creating 1,000 construction and 2,500
permanent jobs as soon as possible."
PAUL MCMORROW
http://hosted.verticalresponse.com/623016/9049b8ae0e/505680039/ad07186e27/
No comments:
Post a Comment