The Food Fight over Predatory Gambling distracts from the facts, destruction and political corruption of the issue, just as it did in Massachusetts.
Too many follow blindly ignoring the community destruction elsewhere, convincing themselves they are somehow 'different.'
An angry Md. senator asks if Peter Franchot is running for governor of West Virginia
By John Wagner
Published: November 3, 2012
A state senator on Friday questioned Comptroller Peter Franchot’s allegiance to Maryland, citing his appearance in television ads funded by an out-of-state company that is trying to defeat an expanded gambling measure in the Free State.
In a letter, Sen. James E. DeGrange Sr. (D-Anne Arundel) said Penn National Gaming is opposing
Question 7 on Maryland’s ballot next week in an effort to protect its economic interests in
a casino it owns in Charles Town, W.Va.
“Your actions against the state of Maryland are totally outrageous,”
DeGrange, a leading member of the Budget & Taxation Committee, wrote to
Franchot on Friday. “We are all aware of your ambitions to be governor, but with
your participation in these ads, it is confusing to me in which state — Maryland
or West Virginia — that you are campaigning.”
Franchot spokesman Joseph Shapiro said that his boss had yet to see the
letter, but added: “It’s not uncommon for temperatures and blood pressures to
rise in the waning days of a campaign. The comptroller likes and respects
Senator DeGrange, but on this issue, he remains convinced it is a bad deal for
Maryland.”
In the ads,
a clip of Franchot is shown in which he says: “I’m opposed
to Question 7 because I can very clearly tell the people of Maryland there is no
new education money coming from this casino.”
Question 7 would allow a new Las Vegas-style casino in Prince George’s
County, as well as table games, such as black jack and roulette, at Maryland’s
five previously designated slots locations. If a casino opens in Prince
George’s, several existing casinos would also get to keep a larger share of
slots proceeds to compensate them for the new competition.
Question 7 is on the ballot as a result of legislation passed in August.
Nonpartisan legislative analysts have said the state’s expanded gambling plan
would eventually net about $200 million a year in additional dollars for
education, though not all of that is directly tied to passage of the ballot
measure.
Shapiro said Friday that Franchot remains convinced that the ballot measure
“will result in not a dime of increased education spending” while it “gives away
millions to a wealthy special interest group.”
Under state law, a share of gambling revenue is earmarked for education. But
overall state spending on education is set by a formula that is not dependent on
fluctuations in gambling proceeds.
In practice, Maryland has used the new revenue from gambling
to replace state funds that otherwise would have been
spent on education.
Given the tight budgets of recent years, however, DeGrange and others argue
that the gambling money has made it easier for the state to fully fund the
formula rather than scale back its commitment to education programs.
“We need a competitive gaming program to fund increases in education,”
DeGrange said in his letter.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/an-angry-md-senator-asks-if-peter-franchot-is-running-for-governor-of-west-virginia/2012/11/02/8847f11e-2535-11e2-9313-3c7f59038d93_story.html
No comments:
Post a Comment