Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Monday, May 14, 2012

Internet Gambling Opposition

Regardless of what voters want, it seems lazy politicians everywhere are stampeding to destroy families sitting in front of their computers, late at night or before they've had their morning coffee.





Instead of sound fiscal policy, by partnering with a Predatory Industry, having their egos stroked by Gambling Lobbyists and their campaign chests filled with generous contributions, lost is the Common Good, a betrayal of their compact with citizens.

An American Declaration on Government and Gambling




New Jersey Voters Don’t Want Internet Gambling [AUDIO]


http://nj1015.com/new-jersey-voters-dont-want-internet-gambling-audio/

Some New Jersey legislators may be excited about expanding Atlantic City gambling to the Internet, but Garden State voters are not.

Internet Gambling
Jupiterimages, Getty Images

A Fairleigh Dickinson University-Public Mind poll released today reveals about three in five New Jersey voters (58%) oppose allowing New Jersey casinos to run betting games over the Internet; just 31% say they favor it, a two-to-one margin against.

Online gambling may be a good bet for new state revenue,” says Peter Woolley, director of the poll, “but lots of voters don’t think it’s a good bet for New Jersey households.”

New Jersey’s gaming industry could sure use a boost. Overall, Atlantic City’s casinos took in $260.6 million in April, a 10 percent decline from a year ago. Slot machine revenue fell 9.2 percent, to $189.5 million, while table game revenue decreased by 12.1 percent, to $ 71.1 million. Casino revenues were up 3% nationwide in 2011, according to an annual report by the American Gaming Association.

Opposition to Internet gambling reaches across many groups. Women oppose it (65%-25%), as do men (52%-37%). Those who have not been to a casino in the past year oppose it (62%-26%), but even those who recently have been to a casino or slots parlor oppose it (51%-42%). The younger the voter, the more likely he or she is to support it, but only those 30 and under show a majority in favor (57%-39%).

Republican and Democratic voters oppose Internet gambling in similar numbers (58% of Republicans and 60% of Democrats), even though they both favor sports betting. And changing the question from Internet “gambling” to the more industry-friendly Internet “gaming” doesn’t change the outcome significantly.

“I suppose there is something to be said for losing money without the inconvenience of leaving town,” says Woolley, “but that’s usually called property taxes or alimony.”

Have a gambling problem? That’s your fault, at least according to this survey. Seventy-nine percent say individuals must be responsible for what they spend, while 16% say the state must put procedures in place to make sure that people don’t spend too much money.
The poll of 797 registered voters statewide was conducted by telephone using both landlines and cell phones from April 30 through May 6, 2012, and has a margin of error of +/-3.5 percentage points.

Legislation to authorize Internet wagering at Atlantic City casinos to enable New Jerseyans to wager on casino games via the Internet was approved last week by an Assembly panel. The bill allows all games that may be played at a casino to be offered through Internet wagering. People would be allowed to be from out-of-state, as long as it’s consistent with federal law, but that’s question that remains up in the air. Legal concerns caused Governor Chris Christie to veto a similar measure.

“We must position New Jersey’s gaming industry to thrive in the 21st Century, and that involves authorizing a legally sound Internet gaming law,” says bill co-sponsor, Assemblyman John Burzichelli. “This is another key piece of our effort to boost New Jersey’s gaming industry by expanding and modernizing our wagering options. This will rejuvenate our tourist industry while increasing employment, capital investment and much needed urban redevelopment.”

Burzichelli and bill co-sponsors Assemblymen Vincent Prieto and Ruben Ramos say their Internet wagering measure would help New Jersey’s gaming industry amid increased competition from other states.

Prieto explains, “”Most everything else has migrated to the Internet and taken advantage of the consumer and revenue options it offers, and New Jersey’s gaming industry should be no different. This is a carefully crafted bill designed to ensure Internet gaming on casino games is offered the right way. It’s a much-needed competitive step forward for our casinos that could also raise more revenue to benefit senior and disabled citizens.” 
[Like the Gambling Industry elsewhere, it's always important to have a popular target to garner local support. In many states, it's 'education,' an easy excuse instead of fiscal responsibility.]

New Jersey could take out-of-state bets, as long as the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement determines that doing so wouldn’t violate federal law. A Senate committee approved a similar bill last month.

“The Internet has long been a reality, and Internet gaming in New Jersey should now be reality too,” says Ramos. “We have to move aggressively and thoughtfully to position our gaming industry to succeed and this is another step toward that goal. It will mean economic growth and job creation for our state.”


Poll: New Jersey voters oppose Internet gambling
By: WAYNE PARRY | Associated Press



ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) A new poll finds most New Jerseyans oppose legalizing Internet gambling, but want the ability to legally bet on sporting events.

A Fairleigh Dickinson University PublicMind poll released Monday finds 58 percent of state residents are against legalizing online gambling, while 31 percent support it.

But voters, by the same margin, support the legalization of sports betting.

New Jersey lawmakers are moving toward approving both kinds of gambling, saying it would give Atlantic City's struggling casinos a boost. But concerns over the constitutionality of both measures still linger.

Gov. Chris Christie signed a law allowing sports betting, but it can only happen in New Jersey if a federal ban on it is lifted. The governor vetoed an Internet gambling bill last year, and has not said if enough changes have been made this year for him to support it.

"Online gambling may be a good bet for new state revenue, but lots of voters don't think it's a good bet for New Jersey," said Peter Woolley, director of the poll. "I suppose there is something to be said for losing money without the inconvenience of leaving town, but that's usually called property tax or alimony."

Internet gambling bills are awaiting votes in the full state Senate and Assembly. Those bills would let Atlantic City's casinos accept bets from gamblers in other states and even other countries, provided state casino regulators determine that doing so wouldn't violate federal law.

There are also concerns by lawmakers about verifying a player's age, although proponents say there is existing technology available to ensure that only those 21 or over can access the systems needed to gamble online.

Proponents say Internet gambling and sports betting are ways for New Jersey to garner millions of dollars in new tax revenue currently being lost to illegal operators, including organized crime and offshore betting sites.

Christie signed a sports betting bill into law in January. But the real work still remains: overturning the federal ban on sports betting in all but four states.

So far, New Jersey has not moved to sue in federal court to overturn the law.

Women opposed Internet gambling by a 65 to 25 percent margin; men voiced opposition at a 52 to 37 percent rate. The younger a voter is, the more likely they are to support it, but the only age group that supported it in the poll were those 30 and under.

Republicans (58 percent) and Democrats (60 percent) oppose Internet gambling at roughly the same rates.

In terms of sports betting, 60 percent of voters said they want it legalized, with 26 percent opposed and 14 percent unsure.

The telephone poll surveyed 797 registered voters statewide between April 30 and May 6. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

No comments: