After conducting another flawed BENEFITS ONLY STUDY costing Massachusetts taxpayers another $80,000, Beacon Hill is content to proclaim "See! See! It says here it will create all of these low wage jobs!" allowing them to sleep easy, facts be damned! (And inflated estimates be damned, as well.)
Where are the costs?
If a Federal Study determined for every $1 in tax revenue expanded gambling provided, the cost to taxpayers was $3, how is it that Beacon Hill has a different funky math?
What other business would we grovel to invite into our Commonwealth that requires this legal mandate?
TO PREVENT CHILD [PET] ABANDONMENT --
595 (17) require gaming establishments to develop security measures, including checking the
596 parking areas of the gaming establishment for unattended minors and animals every 2 hours
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment