Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Sunday, August 7, 2011

Alabama: Jury Question "unlawful plan"

Jury in government corruption trial dismissed for the day
By Mark Wilder

MONTGOMERY, AL (WSFA) - The jury in the government corruption trial in Montgomery has been dismissed for the day.

Around 4:30pm on Saturday, the jury sent a note to the federal judge stating they had a question about something. Around 4:45pm, all counsel was called back into the courtroom by the judge.

The jury asked the judge a question about the definition of "unlawful plan" in the charges given to the jury. Before the jury was given the answer to their question, some defense attorneys asked to review the question and documents and get an answer back on Sunday.

The judge then asked the jury to come into the courtroom. He asked them if it was ok if they got their answer on Sunday. They agreed. When they resume on Sunday the jury will still be deliberating on count 1 of 37.

The jury will be back in court at 1pm Sunday to get the answer to that question and then resume their deliberations. The jury is done working for Saturday.






Jury in Alabama gambling trial to resume deliberations Sunday afternoon
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

MONTGOMERY, Ala. — The jury in Alabama's gambling corruption trial is set to resume deliberations.

The jury ended its second day Saturday without reaching a verdict and indicated there is much more work for the panel to do. They are scheduled to resume work at 1 p.m. Sunday.

They are taking Sunday morning off to attend religious services.

The defendants are a mix of state lawmakers, casino officials and lobbyists. They are accused of buying and selling votes on legislation designed to protect electronic bingo casinos from being closed by state police.

Their case is being heard by a jury of 11 women and one man, who is serving as the jury's foreman.

Defendants and their attorneys anticipate a lengthy decision process because of the large number of defendants and multiple charges.

No comments: