.
This is the closest Massachusetts has come to a referendum on gambling.
.The Secretary of State's site indicates --
.
WHAT YOUR VOTE WILL DO
.
A YES VOTE would prohibit dog races on which betting or wagering occurs, effective January 1, 2010.
.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the laws governing dog racing.
.
Immediately after the vote, Senator Pacheco began condemning voters from Wellesley and Newton for determining the future of Raynham and the dog track.
.
I'm not so sure that's what happened.
.
It seems voters around the state maybe don't want greyhound racing, don't want race tracks, don't want racinos. Maybe they don't even want slot machines or casinos.
.
Maybe we should have a vote.
.
Below are the votes by state rep. district in which voters clearly oppposed greyhound racing.
.
Geraldo Alicea 53% Sixth Worcester
James Arciero 57% Second Middlesex
Brian Ashe 68% Second Hampden
Cory Atkins 64% Fourteenth Middlesex
Demetrius Atsalis 62% Second Barnstable
Ruth Balser 63% Twelfth Middlesex
Jennifer Benson 51% Thirty-Seventh Middlesex
John Binienda 50% Seventeenth Worcester
Daniel Bosley 65% First Berkshire
Garrett Bradley 53% Third Plymouth
William Brownsberger 61% Twenty-Fourth Middlesex
Jennifer Callahan 52% Eighteenth Worcester
Linda Dean Campbell 51% Fifteenth Essex
Katherine Clark 51% Thirty-Second Middlesex
Cheryl Coakley-Rivera 58% Tenth Hampden
Thomas Conroy 67% Thirteenth Middlesex
Michael Costello 57% First Essex
Sean Curran 64% Eleventh Plymouth
Viriato Manuel deMacedo 50% (48% NO) First Plymouth
Brian Dempsey 52% Third Essex
Salvatore DiMasi 59% Third Suffolk
Stephen DiNatale 52% Third Worcester
Paul Donato 50% (45% NO) Thirty-Fifth Middlesex
Christopher Donelan 56% Second Franklin
Carolyn Dykema 60% Eighth Middlesex
Lori Ehrlich 55% Eighth Essex
Lewis Evangelidis 55% First Worcester
John Fernandes 54% Tenth Worcester
Ann-Margaret Ferrante 58% Fifth Essex
Barry Finegold 54% Seventeenth Essex
John Fresolo 52% Sixteenth Worcester
Paul Frost 52% Seventh Worcester
Sean Garballey 59% Twenty-Third Middlesex
Anne Gobi 53% Fifth Worcester
Thomas Golden, Jr. 52% Sixteenth Middlesex
Mary Grant 53% Sixth Essex
Danielle Gregoire 58% Fourth Middlesex
Denis Guyer 68% Second Berkshire
Robert Hargraves 55% First Middlesex
Lida Harkins 59% Thirteenth Norfolk
Jonathan Hecht 63% Twenty-Ninth Middlesex
Bradford Hill 57% Fourth Essex
Kate Hogan 59% Third Middlesex
Kevin Honan 59% Seventeeth Suffolk
Donald Humason, Jr. 67% Fourth Hampden
Michael Kane 65% Fifth Hampden
Jay Kaufman 59% Fifteenth Middlesex
John Kennan 53% Seventh Essex
Kay Khan 63% Eleventh Middlesex
Peter Kocot 74% First Hampshire
Peter Koutoujian 56% Tenth Middlesex
Paul Kujawski 53% Eighth Worcester
Stephen Kulik 71% First Franklin
Jason Lewis 54% Thirty-First Middlesex
David Linsky 59% Fifth Middlesex
Barbara L'Italien 55% Eighteenth Essex
Timothy Madden 67% Barnstable, Dukes & Nantucket
Elizabeth Malia 52% Eleventh Suffolk
Michael Moran 59% Eighteenth Suffolk
Charles Murphy 54% Twenty-First Middlesex
Harold Naughton, Jr. 56% Twelfth Worcester
James O'Day 54% Fourteenth Worcester
Eugene O'Flaherty 52% Second Suffolk
Matthew Patrick 59% Third Barnstable
Sarah Peake 68% Fourth Barnstable
Vincent Pedone 51% Fifteenth Worcester
Alice Peisch 64% Fourteenth Norfolk
Jeffrey Perry 58% Fifth Barnstable
George Peterson, Jr. 56% Ninth Worcester
Thomas Petrolati 63% Seventh Hampden
William Smitty Pignatelli 73% Fourth Berkshire
Karyn Polito 59% Eleventh Worcester
Denise Provost 63% Twenty-Seventh Middlesex
Angelo Puppolo, Jr. 68% Twelflth Hampden
Robert Rice, Jr. 53% Second Worcester
Pam Richardson 60% Sixth Middlesex
Dennis Rosa 52% Fourth Worcester
Richard Ross 50% (versusu 47%) Ninth Norfolk
Michael Rush 52% Tenth Suffolk
Byron Rushing 60% Ninth Suffolk
Jeffrey Sanchez 62% Fifteenth Suffolk
Rosemary Sandlin 66% Third Hampden
Tom Sannicandro 59% Seventh Middlesex
John Scibak 70% Second Hampshire
Carl Sciortino, Jr. 56% Thirty-Fourth Middlesex
Frank Smizik 67% Fifteenth Norfolk
Todd Smola 60% First Hampden
Robert Spellane 56% Thirteenth Worcester
Christopher Speranzo 71% Third Berkshire
Harriett Stanley 53% Second Essex
Thomas Stanley 57% Ninth Middlesex
Ellen Story 72% Third Hampshire
Benjamin Swan 58% Eleventh Hampden
Timothy Toomey, Jr. 60% Twenty-Sixth Middlesex
David Torrisi 53% Fourteenth Essex
Cleon Turner 62% First Barnstable
James Vallee 53% Tenth Norfolk
Joseph Wagner 66% Eighth Hampden
Martha Walz 65% Eighth Suffolk
James Welch 67% Sixth Hampden
Alice Wolf 68% Twenty-Fifth Middlesex
.
Of the following, support for banning Greyhound racing prevailed, but not by a majority ---
.
.
Antonio Cabral 47% (versus 44% No votes) Thirteenth Bristol
James Dwyer 49% (versus 47% NO) Thirtieth Middlesex
James Dwyer 49% (versus 47% NO) Thirtieth Middlesex
Christopher Fallon 49% (versus 45% NO) Thirty-Third Middlesex
Gloria Fox 48% (versus 38% NO) Seventh Suffolk
Colleen Garry 50% (versus 47% NO) Thirty-Sixth Middlesex
Bradley Jones, Jr. 50% (versus 47% NO) Twentieth Middlesex
William Lantigua 39% (versus 38% NO) Sixteenth Essex
Paul McMurtry 49% (versus 46% NO) Eleventh Norfolk
Kevin Murphy 50% (versus 39% NO) Eighteenth Middlesex
David Nangle 50% (versus 44% NO) Seventeenth Middlesex
.
Representatives please take note!
2 comments:
I think people voted on that question based on their views of the ethical humane treatment of the dogs. I don't think people who voted to stop dog racing are necessarily opposed to casino gambling. For all we know, those districts might have a lot of casino crazy dog lovers.
My favorite nocturnal avian, I generally agree with your comments wholeheartedly, but .....
Making the argument that we might also have a lot of anti-gambling folks who hate dogs could be just as valid.
It seems to me that Clyde Barrow took 2 months to take a small sampling to pronounce support for expanded gambling. He conducted that poll AFTER the referendum in which he participated was defeated in Maine. That was one of the ones he couldn't remember when Senator Tucker asked him about his payments/ties from/to the gambling industry.
Maybe that's why we need a statewide referendum on expanded gambling.
Even though the gambling interests flood states with $$$, they are losing support.
What I see from around the country is a growing "Anti Gambling" movement. People are recognizing that "a few slots at the track" turns into loss of local control, 24/7 gambling, increased crime and traffic and a full blown casino.
Afterall, hasn't the owner of Plainridge been pretty clear about his interest in a full casino? He purchased a track that was losing money with future plans to add slots.
Senator "Slot Parlor" Pacheco and Rep. "Slots" Flynn have promoted slots at the tracks for years because the tracks are losing money, losing attendance.
The reason gambling venues "HAVE TO" expand is because they don't pay their way.
NH has a Blue Ribbon Commission.
Maine vote "NO."
Time for Massachusetts to do both - an impartial commission and a ballot question next year.
Post a Comment