Meetings & Information




*****************************
****************************************************
MUST READ:
GET THE FACTS!






Sunday, September 13, 2009

Ballot Question 3 - House Districts

The conundrum of Ballot Question 3!
.

This is the closest Massachusetts has come to a referendum on gambling.
.
The Secretary of State's site indicates --
.
WHAT YOUR VOTE WILL DO
.
A YES VOTE would prohibit dog races on which betting or wagering occurs, effective January 1, 2010.
.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the laws governing dog racing.
.

Immediately after the vote, Senator Pacheco began condemning voters from Wellesley and Newton for determining the future of Raynham and the dog track.
.
I'm not so sure that's what happened.
.
It seems voters around the state maybe don't want greyhound racing, don't want race tracks, don't want racinos. Maybe they don't even want slot machines or casinos.
.
Maybe we should have a vote.
.
Below are the votes by state rep. district in which voters clearly oppposed greyhound racing.

.
Geraldo Alicea 53% Sixth Worcester

James Arciero 57% Second Middlesex


Brian Ashe 68% Second Hampden

Cory Atkins 64% Fourteenth Middlesex

Demetrius Atsalis 62% Second Barnstable

Ruth Balser 63% Twelfth Middlesex

Jennifer Benson 51% Thirty-Seventh Middlesex

John Binienda 50% Seventeenth Worcester

Daniel Bosley 65% First Berkshire

Garrett Bradley 53% Third Plymouth

William Brownsberger 61% Twenty-Fourth Middlesex

Jennifer Callahan 52% Eighteenth Worcester

Linda Dean Campbell 51% Fifteenth Essex

Katherine Clark 51% Thirty-Second Middlesex

Cheryl Coakley-Rivera 58% Tenth Hampden


Thomas Conroy 67% Thirteenth Middlesex

Michael Costello 57% First Essex

Sean Curran 64% Eleventh Plymouth

Viriato Manuel deMacedo 50% (48% NO) First Plymouth

Brian Dempsey 52% Third Essex

Salvatore DiMasi 59% Third Suffolk

Stephen DiNatale 52% Third Worcester

Paul Donato 50% (45% NO) Thirty-Fifth Middlesex

Christopher Donelan 56% Second Franklin

Carolyn Dykema 60% Eighth Middlesex

Lori Ehrlich 55% Eighth Essex

Lewis Evangelidis 55% First Worcester

John Fernandes 54% Tenth Worcester


Ann-Margaret Ferrante 58% Fifth Essex

Barry Finegold 54% Seventeenth Essex

John Fresolo 52% Sixteenth Worcester

Paul Frost 52% Seventh Worcester

Sean Garballey 59% Twenty-Third Middlesex

Anne Gobi 53% Fifth Worcester

Thomas Golden, Jr. 52% Sixteenth Middlesex

Mary Grant 53% Sixth Essex

Danielle Gregoire 58% Fourth Middlesex

Denis Guyer 68% Second Berkshire

Robert Hargraves 55% First Middlesex

Lida Harkins 59% Thirteenth Norfolk

Jonathan Hecht 63% Twenty-Ninth Middlesex

Bradford Hill 57% Fourth Essex

Kate Hogan 59% Third Middlesex

Kevin Honan 59% Seventeeth Suffolk

Donald Humason, Jr. 67% Fourth Hampden

Michael Kane 65% Fifth Hampden

Jay Kaufman 59% Fifteenth Middlesex

John Kennan 53% Seventh Essex

Kay Khan 63% Eleventh Middlesex

Peter Kocot 74% First Hampshire

Peter Koutoujian 56% Tenth Middlesex

Paul Kujawski 53% Eighth Worcester

Stephen Kulik 71% First Franklin

Jason Lewis 54% Thirty-First Middlesex

David Linsky 59% Fifth Middlesex

Barbara L'Italien 55% Eighteenth Essex

Timothy Madden 67% Barnstable, Dukes & Nantucket

Elizabeth Malia 52% Eleventh Suffolk


Michael Moran 59% Eighteenth Suffolk

Charles Murphy 54% Twenty-First Middlesex

Harold Naughton, Jr. 56% Twelfth Worcester

James O'Day 54% Fourteenth Worcester

Eugene O'Flaherty 52% Second Suffolk

Matthew Patrick 59% Third Barnstable


Sarah Peake 68% Fourth Barnstable

Vincent Pedone 51% Fifteenth Worcester

Alice Peisch 64% Fourteenth Norfolk

Jeffrey Perry 58% Fifth Barnstable

George Peterson, Jr. 56% Ninth Worcester

Thomas Petrolati 63% Seventh Hampden

William Smitty Pignatelli 73% Fourth Berkshire

Karyn Polito 59% Eleventh Worcester

Denise Provost 63% Twenty-Seventh Middlesex

Angelo Puppolo, Jr. 68% Twelflth Hampden

Robert Rice, Jr. 53% Second Worcester

Pam Richardson 60% Sixth Middlesex

Dennis Rosa 52% Fourth Worcester

Richard Ross 50% (versusu 47%) Ninth Norfolk

Michael Rush 52% Tenth Suffolk

Byron Rushing 60% Ninth Suffolk

Jeffrey Sanchez 62% Fifteenth Suffolk

Rosemary Sandlin 66% Third Hampden

Tom Sannicandro 59% Seventh Middlesex

John Scibak 70% Second Hampshire

Carl Sciortino, Jr. 56% Thirty-Fourth Middlesex

Frank Smizik 67% Fifteenth Norfolk

Todd Smola 60% First Hampden

Robert Spellane 56% Thirteenth Worcester

Christopher Speranzo 71% Third Berkshire

Harriett Stanley 53% Second Essex

Thomas Stanley 57% Ninth Middlesex

Ellen Story 72% Third Hampshire

Benjamin Swan 58% Eleventh Hampden

Timothy Toomey, Jr. 60% Twenty-Sixth Middlesex

David Torrisi 53% Fourteenth Essex

Cleon Turner 62% First Barnstable

James Vallee 53% Tenth Norfolk

Joseph Wagner 66% Eighth Hampden

Martha Walz 65% Eighth Suffolk

James Welch 67% Sixth Hampden

Alice Wolf 68% Twenty-Fifth Middlesex

.

Of the following, support for banning Greyhound racing prevailed, but not by a majority ---
.
Antonio Cabral 47% (versus 44% No votes) Thirteenth Bristol

James Dwyer 49% (versus 47% NO) Thirtieth Middlesex

Christopher Fallon 49% (versus 45% NO) Thirty-Third Middlesex


Gloria Fox 48% (versus 38% NO) Seventh Suffolk

Colleen Garry 50% (versus 47% NO) Thirty-Sixth Middlesex

Bradley Jones, Jr. 50% (versus 47% NO) Twentieth Middlesex


William Lantigua 39% (versus 38% NO) Sixteenth Essex

Paul McMurtry 49% (versus 46% NO) Eleventh Norfolk

Kevin Murphy 50% (versus 39% NO) Eighteenth Middlesex

David Nangle 50% (versus 44% NO) Seventeenth Middlesex


.

Representatives please take note!


2 comments:

Smoking Owl said...

I think people voted on that question based on their views of the ethical humane treatment of the dogs. I don't think people who voted to stop dog racing are necessarily opposed to casino gambling. For all we know, those districts might have a lot of casino crazy dog lovers.

Middleboro Review said...

My favorite nocturnal avian, I generally agree with your comments wholeheartedly, but .....

Making the argument that we might also have a lot of anti-gambling folks who hate dogs could be just as valid.

It seems to me that Clyde Barrow took 2 months to take a small sampling to pronounce support for expanded gambling. He conducted that poll AFTER the referendum in which he participated was defeated in Maine. That was one of the ones he couldn't remember when Senator Tucker asked him about his payments/ties from/to the gambling industry.

Maybe that's why we need a statewide referendum on expanded gambling.

Even though the gambling interests flood states with $$$, they are losing support.

What I see from around the country is a growing "Anti Gambling" movement. People are recognizing that "a few slots at the track" turns into loss of local control, 24/7 gambling, increased crime and traffic and a full blown casino.

Afterall, hasn't the owner of Plainridge been pretty clear about his interest in a full casino? He purchased a track that was losing money with future plans to add slots.

Senator "Slot Parlor" Pacheco and Rep. "Slots" Flynn have promoted slots at the tracks for years because the tracks are losing money, losing attendance.

The reason gambling venues "HAVE TO" expand is because they don't pay their way.


NH has a Blue Ribbon Commission.
Maine vote "NO."

Time for Massachusetts to do both - an impartial commission and a ballot question next year.