Ballot Question 3 - Senate Districts

The conundrum of Ballot Question 3 continues below in the list of State Senate Districts which supported the elimination of greyhound racing.

What did the vote mean? Maybe a statewide referendum on predatory gambling makes sense.

Steven Baddour 53% First Essex

Frederick Berry 50% (versus 47% NO) Second Essex

Stephen Brewer 55% Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire & Franklin

Scott Brown 55% Norfolk, Bristol & Middlesex

Stephen Buoniconti 64% Hampden

Gale Candaras 66% First Hampden & Hampshire

Harriette Chandler 55% First Worcester

Sonia Chang-Diaz 56% Second Suffolk

Cynthia Stone Creem 64% First Middlesex & Norfolk

Kenneth Donnelly 55% Fourth Middlesex

Benjamin Downing 70% Berkshire, Hampshire & Franklin

James Eldridge 58% Middlesex & Worcester

Susan Fargo 60% Third Middlesex

Jennifer Flanagan 53% Worcester & Middlesex

Anthony Galluccio 54% Middlesex, Suffolk & Essex

Patricia Jehlen 57% Second Middlesex

Michael Knapik 67% Second Hampden & Hampshire

Michael Moore 54% Second Worcester

Richard Moore 53% Worcester & Norfolk

Therese Murray 53% Plymouth & Barnstable
(Senate President, known for her Cha Ching Gesture. Hmmm...
The only "Cha Ching" I hear is taxpayers subsidizing wealthy, out of state investors.)

Robert O'Leary 65% Cape & Islands

Steven Panagiotakos 53% First Middlesex

Anthony Petruccelli 52% First Suffolk & Middlesex

Stanley Rosenberg 72% Hampshire & Franklin

Karen Spilka 58% Second Middlesex & Norfolk

Bruce Tarr 55% First Essex & Middlesex

Richard Tisei 50% (versus 46% NO) Middlesex & Essex

Steven Tolman 61% Second Suffolk & Middlesex

Susan Tucker 50% Second Essex & Middlesex

Would "WE, the Taxpayers" vote against Greyhound Racing and support creating Slot Parlors at the remaining vacant "tracks"?

.
If you want to clarify your vote, the phone numbers of your elected officials may be found at this Mass.Gov site. (On the left side, click on House or Senate.)